Revised Land and Resource Management Plan; Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, South Lake Tahoe, CA, 5264-5265 [07-475]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
5264
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Notices
of 1969 (NEPA), as amended (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality for
implementing the procedural provisions
of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), (3)
USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS’ NEPA
Implementing Procedures (7 CFR part
372). Copies of the EA are available
from the individual listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 30th day of
January 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7–1790 Filed 2–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Revised Land and Resource
Management Plan; Lake Tahoe Basin
Management Unit, South Lake Tahoe,
CA
Notice of initiation to revise the
Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit
Land and Resource Management Plan.
ACTION:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will revise
the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Plan
(hereafter referred to as the Forest Plan).
This notice describes the documents
available for review and how to obtain
them; summarizes the need to change
the Forest Plan and the initial scope of
revision based upon management
review and determination; provides
information concerning public
participation and collaboration; and
includes the names and addresses of
agency officials who can provide
additional information.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to:
Forest Plan Revision—LTBMU, 35
College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA
96150. E-mail: commentspacificsouthwest-ltbmu@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Todd Chaponot at (530) 543–2742 or
Robert King at (530) 543–2619; or e-mail
the revision team at : commentspacificsouthwest-ltbmu@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Documents Available for Review
The Comprehensive Evaluation
Report is the Forest Plan revision
analysis document that provides an
evaluation of current ecological,
economic, and social conditions and
trends; these contribute to sustainability
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:07 Feb 02, 2007
Jkt 211001
within the Forest Service lands
managed by the Lake Tahoe Basin
Management Unit (LTBMU). Publication
and review of the Comprehensive
Evaluation Report (CER) formally
launches LTBMU’s Forest Plan Revision
process. The information detailed in the
CER analysis, and further distilled
within the forest supervisor’s
management review and revision theme
areas are provided for public and agency
review and comment. This document is
now available for review (see Public
Participation and Collaboration
subtopic).
Components of the Forest Plan
As required under the National Forest
Management Act, Terri Marceron, Forest
Supervisor, LTBMU has made a
determination that conditions exist that
warrant a revision of the existing 1988
Forest Plan (see Forest Supervisor’s
Determination—Preliminary Need for
Change Topics). The Management
Review is the preamble to the
Comprehensive Evaluation Report
document; it describes the scope of the
plan revision, rationale, and formal
determination to proceed with revision
of the LTBMU Forest Plan. The
information contained in the CER, in
concert with information acquired from
substantive comments, will be used to
structure a revised plan. The revised
Forest Plan will include the following
components: Desired conditions,
objectives, guidelines, suitability of
areas and special areas (Reference: CFR
219.7).
Forest Supervisor’s Determination—
Preliminary Need for Change Topics
Much of the direction contained in
the 1988 Forest Plan is still valid. The
parts of the plan that are working well
will be carried forward into the revised
Plan, limiting the revision to areas
where new regulations and policy, new
science, resource information, and
changing social, economic, and ecologic
conditions and trends have created a
need for updated guidance. Through the
public participation and collaboration
process the Forest Supervisor has
determined that the Forest Plan
Revision will focus on four preliminary
themes:
• Ecosystem restoration,
• Recreation management,
• Land use,
• Planning and adaptive
management.
(Reference: CER Management Review; and
CER Chapter 2)
Comment Requested
The Forest Service is seeking public
comments about the appropriateness of
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the specific preliminary Need for
Change topics identified in the CER
document. Public comments should fall
within two specific areas: (1) Whether
the scope and appropriate
representation of the four major theme
areas identified in the CER is addressed
adequately, and with the appropriate
science; and (2) Specific issue areas of
importance to the public that were not
addressed adequately in the information
presented in the full CER document.
Substantive comments received by 19
March 2007 will be of the most value in
evaluating public response to the
adequacy of the need for change themes
outlined in the Comprehensive
Evaluation Report.
Planning Process Schedule
The revision process for the Lake
Tahoe Basin Management Unit officially
begins in January 2007 with the
publication of this Notice of Initiation in
the Federal Register. The final revised
Forest Plan is scheduled to be issued for
pre-decisional review in July 2008.
Final approval of the revised LTBMU
Forest Plan is scheduled to occur
October 2008. As of the publication date
of this notice, it is the intent of the
Forest Supervisor, Terri Marceron,
consistent with national Forest Service
policy, that the revised forest plan will
be published as a Categorical Exclusion
(Reference: Forest Service Handbook
FSH 1909.12, Ch. 30, Jan. 31, 2006).
Responsible Official
Terri Marceron, Forest Supervisor,
Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit at
35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA
96150.
Public Participation and Collaboration
The revision process is designed to
provide continued opportunities for
public collaboration in the management
of public land in the Lake Tahoe Basin
and provide open participation in the
development of the revised Forest Plan.
Pursuant to 36 CFR 219.13(a), only
parties that participate in the planning
process through the submission of
written comments can submit an
objection upon publication of the
revised Forest Plan decision (see
Planning Process Schedule). For
additional information on the Forest
Plan revision processes, access the Lake
Tahoe Basin Management Web site at:
https://www.fs.fed.us/r5/ltbmu/projects/.
Likewise, interested members of the
public can request to receive LTBMU
Forest Plan revision information
updates via U.S. Mail delivery, by
mailing a request to: Forest Plan
Revision—LTBMU, 35 College Drive,
South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, e-mailing:
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 23 / Monday, February 5, 2007 / Notices
comments-pacificsouthwestltbmu@fs.fed.us, or phoning the Lake
Tahoe Basin Management Unit: (530)
543–2600.
Dated: January 29, 2007.
Terri Marceron,
Forest Supervisor, Lake Tahoe Basin
Management Unit.
[FR Doc. 07–475 Filed 2–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Information Systems Technical
Advisory Committee; Notice of
Partially Closed Meeting
The Information Systems Technical
Advisory Committee (ISTAC) will meet
on February 27 and 28, 2007, 9 a.m., at
the Space and Naval Warfare Systems
Center (SPAWAR), Building 33, Cloud
Room, 53560 Hull Street, San Diego,
California 92152. The Committee
advises the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration on
technical questions that affect the level
of export controls applicable to
information systems equipment and
technology.
Tuesday, February 27
Open Session
1. Opening Remarks and
Introductions.
2. Remarks from the Bureau of
Industry and Security.
3. Graphics Processors.
4. High Performance Computer
Market in Asia.
5. Encryption.
6. Planning for Comprehensive
Review of the Commerce Control List
(CCL).
7. 3A2 Instrumentation.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
A–570–863
Honey from the People’s Republic of
China: Initiation of New Shipper
Antidumping Duty Reviews
8. 3A2 Instrumentation
(Continuation).
Wednesday, February 28
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Closed Session
9. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 section 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
A limited number of seats will be
available for the public session.
Reservations are not accepted. To the
extent time permits, members of the
public may present oral statements to
the Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
Jkt 211001
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: February 5, 2007.
SUMMARY: On December 28, 2006, the
Department of Commerce (‘‘the
Department’’) received a request from
QHD Sanhai Honey Co., Ltd. (‘‘QHD
Sanhai’’) to conduct a new shipper
review of the antidumping duty order
on honey from the People’s Republic of
China (‘‘PRC’’). We have determined
that this request meets the statutory and
regulatory requirements for the
initiation of a new shipper review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scot
Fullerton or Christopher Riker, AD/CVD
Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
AGENCY:
Open Session
15:07 Feb 02, 2007
Dated: January 31, 2007.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07–489 Filed 2–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–M
Wednesday, February 28
VerDate Aug<31>2005
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
distribution of public presentation
materials to Committee members, the
Committee suggests that public
presentation materials or comments be
forwarded before the meeting to Ms.
Yvette Springer at
Yspringer@bis.doc.gov.
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
the delegate of the General Counsel,
formally determined on November 21,
2006, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 section
(10)(d)), that the portion of the meeting
concerning trade secrets and
commercial or financial information
deemed privileged or confidential as
described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and the
portion of the meeting concerning
matters the disclosure of which would
be likely to frustrate significantly
implementation of an agency action as
described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 section 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The
remaining portions of the meeting will
be open to the public.
For more information, call Yvette
Springer at (202) 482–2813.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5265
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1386 or (202) 482–
3441, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department received a timely
request from QHD Sanhai in accordance
with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’) and
19 CFR 351.214 (c), for a new shipper
review of the antidumping duty order
on honey from the PRC, which has a
December anniversary month. See
Notice of Amended Final Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order; Honey from
the People’s Republic of China, 66 FR
63670 (December 10, 2001). QHD
Sanhai identified itself as a producer
and exporter of honey. As required by
19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i) and (iii)(A),
QHD Sanhai certified that it did not
export honey to the United States
during the period of investigation
(‘‘POI’’), and that it has never been
affiliated with any exporter or producer
which exported honey to the United
States during the POI. Furthermore, the
company also certified that its export
activities are not controlled by the
government of the PRC, satisfying the
requirements of 19 CFR
351.214(b)(2)(iii)(B).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iv),
QHD Sanhai submitted documentation
establishing the date on which the
subject merchandise was first entered
for consumption in the United States,
the volume of that first shipment and
any subsequent shipments, and the date
of the first sale to an unaffiliated
customer in the United States.
The Department conducted Customs
database queries and analyzed Customs
entry packages to confirm that the
shipments made by QHD Sanhai had
officially entered the United States via
assignment of an entry date in the
Customs database by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’). In addition,
the Department confirmed the existence
of QHD Sanhai and its U.S. customer.
Initiation of Review
In accordance with section
751(a)(2)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.214(d)(1), and based on information
on the record, we are initiating a new
shipper review for QHD Sanhai. See
Memorandum to the File through James
C. Doyle, Director, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 9, Import Administration, from
Scot Fullerton, Senior Case Analyst,
AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import
Administration, regarding Initiation of
Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review:
Honey from the People’s Republic of
E:\FR\FM\05FEN1.SGM
05FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 23 (Monday, February 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5264-5265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-475]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Revised Land and Resource Management Plan; Lake Tahoe Basin
Management Unit, South Lake Tahoe, CA
ACTION: Notice of initiation to revise the Lake Tahoe Basin Management
Unit Land and Resource Management Plan.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service will revise the Lake Tahoe Basin Management
Plan (hereafter referred to as the Forest Plan). This notice describes
the documents available for review and how to obtain them; summarizes
the need to change the Forest Plan and the initial scope of revision
based upon management review and determination; provides information
concerning public participation and collaboration; and includes the
names and addresses of agency officials who can provide additional
information.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: Forest Plan Revision--LTBMU, 35
College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. E-mail: comments-
pacificsouthwest-ltbmu@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Todd Chaponot at (530) 543-2742 or
Robert King at (530) 543-2619; or e-mail the revision team at :
comments-pacificsouthwest-ltbmu@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Documents Available for Review
The Comprehensive Evaluation Report is the Forest Plan revision
analysis document that provides an evaluation of current ecological,
economic, and social conditions and trends; these contribute to
sustainability within the Forest Service lands managed by the Lake
Tahoe Basin Management Unit (LTBMU). Publication and review of the
Comprehensive Evaluation Report (CER) formally launches LTBMU's Forest
Plan Revision process. The information detailed in the CER analysis,
and further distilled within the forest supervisor's management review
and revision theme areas are provided for public and agency review and
comment. This document is now available for review (see Public
Participation and Collaboration subtopic).
Components of the Forest Plan
As required under the National Forest Management Act, Terri
Marceron, Forest Supervisor, LTBMU has made a determination that
conditions exist that warrant a revision of the existing 1988 Forest
Plan (see Forest Supervisor's Determination--Preliminary Need for
Change Topics). The Management Review is the preamble to the
Comprehensive Evaluation Report document; it describes the scope of the
plan revision, rationale, and formal determination to proceed with
revision of the LTBMU Forest Plan. The information contained in the
CER, in concert with information acquired from substantive comments,
will be used to structure a revised plan. The revised Forest Plan will
include the following components: Desired conditions, objectives,
guidelines, suitability of areas and special areas (Reference: CFR
219.7).
Forest Supervisor's Determination--Preliminary Need for Change Topics
Much of the direction contained in the 1988 Forest Plan is still
valid. The parts of the plan that are working well will be carried
forward into the revised Plan, limiting the revision to areas where new
regulations and policy, new science, resource information, and changing
social, economic, and ecologic conditions and trends have created a
need for updated guidance. Through the public participation and
collaboration process the Forest Supervisor has determined that the
Forest Plan Revision will focus on four preliminary themes:
Ecosystem restoration,
Recreation management,
Land use,
Planning and adaptive management.
(Reference: CER Management Review; and CER Chapter 2)
Comment Requested
The Forest Service is seeking public comments about the
appropriateness of the specific preliminary Need for Change topics
identified in the CER document. Public comments should fall within two
specific areas: (1) Whether the scope and appropriate representation of
the four major theme areas identified in the CER is addressed
adequately, and with the appropriate science; and (2) Specific issue
areas of importance to the public that were not addressed adequately in
the information presented in the full CER document. Substantive
comments received by 19 March 2007 will be of the most value in
evaluating public response to the adequacy of the need for change
themes outlined in the Comprehensive Evaluation Report.
Planning Process Schedule
The revision process for the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit
officially begins in January 2007 with the publication of this Notice
of Initiation in the Federal Register. The final revised Forest Plan is
scheduled to be issued for pre-decisional review in July 2008. Final
approval of the revised LTBMU Forest Plan is scheduled to occur October
2008. As of the publication date of this notice, it is the intent of
the Forest Supervisor, Terri Marceron, consistent with national Forest
Service policy, that the revised forest plan will be published as a
Categorical Exclusion (Reference: Forest Service Handbook FSH 1909.12,
Ch. 30, Jan. 31, 2006).
Responsible Official
Terri Marceron, Forest Supervisor, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit
at 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150.
Public Participation and Collaboration
The revision process is designed to provide continued opportunities
for public collaboration in the management of public land in the Lake
Tahoe Basin and provide open participation in the development of the
revised Forest Plan. Pursuant to 36 CFR 219.13(a), only parties that
participate in the planning process through the submission of written
comments can submit an objection upon publication of the revised Forest
Plan decision (see Planning Process Schedule). For additional
information on the Forest Plan revision processes, access the Lake
Tahoe Basin Management Web site at: https://www.fs.fed.us/r5/ltbmu/
projects/. Likewise, interested members of the public can request to
receive LTBMU Forest Plan revision information updates via U.S. Mail
delivery, by mailing a request to: Forest Plan Revision--LTBMU, 35
College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, e-mailing:
[[Page 5265]]
comments-pacificsouthwest-ltbmu@fs.fed.us, or phoning the Lake Tahoe
Basin Management Unit: (530) 543-2600.
Dated: January 29, 2007.
Terri Marceron,
Forest Supervisor, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit.
[FR Doc. 07-475 Filed 2-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
