Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 5048-5049 [E7-1728]
Download as PDF
5048
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 22 / Friday, February 2, 2007 / Notices
to deliver to the Secretary of the
Commission, a copy of the
communication, if written, or a
summary of the substance of any oral
communication.
Prohibited communications are
included in a public, non-decisional file
associated with, but not a part of, the
decisional record of the proceeding.
Unless the Commission determines that
the prohibited communication and any
responses thereto should become a part
of the decisional record, the prohibited
off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in
reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to
respond to any facts or contentions
made in a prohibited off-the-record
communication, and may request that
the Commission place the prohibited
communication and responses thereto
in the decisional record. The
Commission will grant such a request
only when it determines that fairness so
requires. Any person identified below as
having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the
document on all parties listed on the
official service list for the applicable
proceeding in accordance with Rule
2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
Exempt off-the-record
communications are included in the
decisional record of the proceeding,
unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40
CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
Docket No.
The following is a list of off-therecord communications recently
received by the Secretary of the
Commission. The communications
listed are grouped by docket numbers in
ascending order. These filings are
available for review at the Commission
in the Public Reference Room or may be
viewed on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary
link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the
docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, please contact
FERC, Online Support at
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll
free at (866)208–3676, or for TTY,
contact (202) 502–8659.
Date received
Presenter or requester
Prohibited:
1. CP06–54–000 ......................................................................................................................
Exempt:
1. CP06–54–000 ......................................................................................................................
2. Project No. 2100–00 ............................................................................................................
3. Project No. 2539–000 ..........................................................................................................
1–23–07
Stewart P. McMullan.
1–24–07
1–25–07
1–16–07
4. Project No. 2545–000 ..........................................................................................................
1–18–07
Hon. Gina McCarthy.
Kenneth Sanchez.
Hon. Charles E. Schumer.
Hon. Michael R. McNulty.
Robert G. Whitlam, Ph.D.
Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–1672 Filed 1–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6683–7]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act, as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167. An explanation of the
ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17845).
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20060355, ERP No. D–MMS–
A02244–00, Outer Continental Shelf
Oil & Gas Leasing Program: 2007–
2012, Exploration and Development
Offshore Marine Environment and
Coastal Counties of AL, AK, DE, FL,
LA, MD, MS, NJ, NC, TX and VA.
Summary: EPA expressed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Feb 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
environmental concerns about
cumulative impacts and mitigation.
Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060378, ERP No. D–NPS–
A84030–00, Programmatic—Servicewide Benefits Sharing Project, To
Clarify the Rights and Responsibilities
of Researchers and National Park
Service (NPS) Management in
Connection with the Use of Valuable
Discoveries, Inventions, and Other
Developments, across the United
States. Summary: EPA does not object
to the preferred alternative. Rating
LO.
EIS No. 20060413, ERP No. D–FTA–
E59003–FL, Programmatic—South
Florida East Coast Corridor Transit
Analysis Study Tier 1, To Address
Transportation Demand, Miami-Dade,
Broward and Palm Beach Counties,
FL. Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about the
impacts to aquatic resources
(wetlands, streams, sole source
aquifers, and aquatic preserves),
communities, archeological and
historic properties, and contaminated
sites, and noise impacts. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060415, ERP No. D–USA–
J11023–CO, Fort Carson
Transformation Program,
Implementation, Base Realignment
and Closure Activities, Fort Carson, El
Paso, Pueblo and Fremont Counties,
CO. Summary: EPA expressed
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
environmental concerns about
impacts to water quality, air quality
and biological resources, and
requested additional information on
these impacts and mitigation
measures to reduced impacts. Rating
EC2.
EIS No. 20060437, ERP No. D–NRS–
D36122–WV, Dunloup Creek
Watershed Plan, Voluntary
Floodplain Buyout, Implementation,
West Virginia Third Congressional
District, Fayette and Raleigh Counties,
WV. Summary: EPA does not object to
the proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20060440, ERP No. D–GSA–
D81037–VA, Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) Central Records
Complex, Site Selection and
Construction, Winchester, Frederick
County, VA. Summary: EPA
expressed environmental concern
about potential water resource
impacts. Rating EC1.
EIS No. 20060455, ERP No. D–WPA–
K05063–AZ, San Luis Rio Colorado
Project, Construct, Operate, Maintain,
and Connect a Double-Circuited
500,000-volt Electric Transmission
Line, Right-of-Way Grant and
Presidential Permit, (DOE/EIS–0395)
Yuma County, AZ. Summary: EPA
does not object to the proposed
action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20060475, ERP No. D–SFW–
G64013–TX, Texas Chenier Plain
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 22 / Friday, February 2, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
National Wildlife Refuge Complex,
Development of a 15-Year
Management Plan (Comprehensive
Conservation Plan) for Refuge
Complex, and Expansion of the
Approval Land Acquisition
Boundaries (Land Protection Plan) for
the Four Refuges: Moody, Anahuac,
McFaddin and Texas Point National
Wildlife Refuges, Chambers, Jefferson
and Galveston Counties, TX.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
preferred alternative. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20060478, ERP No. D–COE–
K39102–CA, Success Dam Seismic
Remediation Dam Safety Project,
Proposes To Remediate Deficiencies
in the Dam’s Foundation, Tulare
River, Tulare County, CA. Summary:
EPA expressed environmental
concerns about impacts to air quality
and aquatic resources, and requested
additional information on the
alternatives analysis and mitigation
for impacts to water resources and
fisheries. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060494, ERP No. D–DOE–
D09801–WV, Western Greenbier CoProduction Demonstration Project,
Construction and Demonstration of a
98 megawatt (MWe) Net Power Plant
and Ash Byproduct Manufacturing
Facility, Rainelle, WV. Summary: EPA
expressed environmental concerns
about water resource impacts, coal
refuse pile restoration activity, and
ash management. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060247, ERP No. DS–FTA–
E40775–FL, Miami North Corridor
Project, Updated Information, Transit
Improvement between NW 62 Street
at Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Station
and NW 215th Street at the Dade/
Broward Counties Line, Funding,
Dade County, FL. Summary: EPA
expressed environmental concerns
about noise and contamination
impacts as well as impacts related to
relocations. In addition, EPA
recommends that mitigation measures
be documented in the FEIS as project
commitments. Rating EC2.
Final EIS’s
EIS No. 20060491, ERP No. F1–FHW–
L40194–WA, WA–167 Freeway
Project, Construction, from 161
(Meridan Street North) in the City of
Puyallup to the WA–509 Freeway in
the City of Tacoma, Funding, U.S.
Coast Guard, NPDES, U.S. Army COE
Section 10 and 404 Permits, Cities of
Puyallup, Fife, Edgewood, Milton,
and Tacoma, Pierce County, WA.
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns about loss of
prime farmland, and impacts to listed
fish species, water quality, and
wildlife habitat connectivity. EPA has
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Feb 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
further concerns about noise, air
toxics, and environmental justice and
tribal issues.
EIS No. 20060433, ERP No. F–NOA–
L91027–00, Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fishery Management Plan, Proposed
Acceptable Biological Catch and
Optimum Yield Specifications and
Management Measures for the 2007–
2008 Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
and Amendment 16–4 Rebuilding
Plans for Seven Depleted Pacific Coast
Groundfish Species, WA, OR and CA.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20060487, ERP No. F–AFS–
K65315–CA, South Yuba Canal
Maintenance Project, Hazardous Trees
Removal, Implementation, Tahoe
National Forest, Nevada County, CA.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20060489, ERP No. F–COE–
F32198–00, Lock and Dam 3
Mississippi River Navigation Safety
and Embankments, To Reduce Related
Navigation Safety and Embankment
Problems, Upper Mississippi River,
Goodhue County, MN and Pierce
County, WI. Summary: EPA’s original
concerns about proposed mitigation
monitoring, water quality, and
conclusions with cumulative impact
analysis have been adequately
addressed; therefore, we do not object
to the proposed project.
EIS No. 20060504, ERP No. F–IBR–
K39095–CA, South Delta
Improvements Program, To Improve
Water Quality, Water Conveyance,
and Fish Habitat Conditions, Central
Valley Project, U.S. Army COE
Section 404 Permit, South
Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta,
Several Counties, CA. Summary: EPA
supports the staged decision-making
process between Stage 1 physical
construction and Stage 2 operational
actions. EPA provided
recommendations for Stage 2
analyses, and urged undertaking a
public process to scope key issues for
the Stage 2 document. EPA
emphasized the need to evaluate, and
avoid, water quality impacts of gate
operations and analysis of alternatives
that meet the basic project purpose as
part of the continuing Clean Water
Act permitting process.
EIS No. 20060511, ERP No. F–DOE–
G03030–00, Strategic Petroleum
Reserve Expansion, Site Selection of
Five New Sites: Chacahoula and
Clovelly, in Lafourche Parish, LA;
Burinsburg, Claiborne County, MS;
Richton, Perry County, MS; and
Stratton Ridge, Brazoria County, TX
and Existing Site Bayou Choctaw,
Iberville Parish, LA, West Hackberry,
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5049
Cameron and Calcasieu Parishes, LA;
and Big Hill, Jefferson County, TX.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20060527, ERP No. F–AFS–
F65065–WI, Long Rail Vegetation and
Transportation Management Project,
Implementation, Eagle River-Florence
Ranger District, Chequamegon-Nicolet
National Forest, Florence and Forest
Counties, WI. Summary: The Final
EIS addressed EPA’s comments
relating to consistency with the Forest
Management Plan; we support
continued monitoring of Regional
Forester Sensitive Species as part of
the Forest’s environmental
management system. EPA does not
object to the proposed action.
Dated: January 30, 2007.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7–1728 Filed 2–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6683–6]
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice Of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements Filed 01/22/2007 Through
01/26/2007
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20070019, Draft EIS, FHW, TX,
Grand Parkway/State Highway 99
Improvement Project, Segment G,
from Interstate Highway (IH) 45 to
U.S. 59, Funding, Right-of-Way Grant,
U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit,
Harris and Montgomery Counties, TX,
Comment Period Ends: 04/27/2007,
Contact: Donald Davis 512–536–5960.
EIS No. 20070020, Final EIS, AFS, AK,
Tuxekan Island Timber Sale(s)
Project, Timber Harvesting,
Implementation, Coast Guard Bridge
Permit, U.S. Army COE Section 10
and 404 Permits, Tongas National
Forest, Thorne Bay Ranger District,
Thorne Bay, AK, Wait Period Ends:
03/05/2007, Contact: Forrest Cole
907–228–6200.
EIS No. 20070021, Draft Supplement,
BLM, MT, Montana Statewide Oil and
Gas, Development Alternative for Coal
Bed Natural Gas Production and
Amendment of the Powder River and
Billings Resource Management Plans,
Additional Information Three New
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 22 (Friday, February 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5048-5049]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1728]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6683-7]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act, as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published
in FR dated April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17845).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20060355, ERP No. D-MMS-A02244-00, Outer Continental Shelf Oil
& Gas Leasing Program: 2007-2012, Exploration and Development Offshore
Marine Environment and Coastal Counties of AL, AK, DE, FL, LA, MD, MS,
NJ, NC, TX and VA. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about
cumulative impacts and mitigation. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060378, ERP No. D-NPS-A84030-00, Programmatic--Service-wide
Benefits Sharing Project, To Clarify the Rights and Responsibilities of
Researchers and National Park Service (NPS) Management in Connection
with the Use of Valuable Discoveries, Inventions, and Other
Developments, across the United States. Summary: EPA does not object to
the preferred alternative. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20060413, ERP No. D-FTA-E59003-FL, Programmatic--South Florida
East Coast Corridor Transit Analysis Study Tier 1, To Address
Transportation Demand, Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Counties, FL.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about the impacts to
aquatic resources (wetlands, streams, sole source aquifers, and aquatic
preserves), communities, archeological and historic properties, and
contaminated sites, and noise impacts. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060415, ERP No. D-USA-J11023-CO, Fort Carson Transformation
Program, Implementation, Base Realignment and Closure Activities, Fort
Carson, El Paso, Pueblo and Fremont Counties, CO. Summary: EPA
expressed environmental concerns about impacts to water quality, air
quality and biological resources, and requested additional information
on these impacts and mitigation measures to reduced impacts. Rating
EC2.
EIS No. 20060437, ERP No. D-NRS-D36122-WV, Dunloup Creek Watershed
Plan, Voluntary Floodplain Buyout, Implementation, West Virginia Third
Congressional District, Fayette and Raleigh Counties, WV. Summary: EPA
does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20060440, ERP No. D-GSA-D81037-VA, Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) Central Records Complex, Site Selection and
Construction, Winchester, Frederick County, VA. Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concern about potential water resource impacts. Rating
EC1.
EIS No. 20060455, ERP No. D-WPA-K05063-AZ, San Luis Rio Colorado
Project, Construct, Operate, Maintain, and Connect a Double-Circuited
500,000-volt Electric Transmission Line, Right-of-Way Grant and
Presidential Permit, (DOE/EIS-0395) Yuma County, AZ. Summary: EPA does
not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20060475, ERP No. D-SFW-G64013-TX, Texas Chenier Plain
[[Page 5049]]
National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Development of a 15-Year Management
Plan (Comprehensive Conservation Plan) for Refuge Complex, and
Expansion of the Approval Land Acquisition Boundaries (Land Protection
Plan) for the Four Refuges: Moody, Anahuac, McFaddin and Texas Point
National Wildlife Refuges, Chambers, Jefferson and Galveston Counties,
TX. Summary: EPA does not object to the preferred alternative. Rating
LO.
EIS No. 20060478, ERP No. D-COE-K39102-CA, Success Dam Seismic
Remediation Dam Safety Project, Proposes To Remediate Deficiencies in
the Dam's Foundation, Tulare River, Tulare County, CA. Summary: EPA
expressed environmental concerns about impacts to air quality and
aquatic resources, and requested additional information on the
alternatives analysis and mitigation for impacts to water resources and
fisheries. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060494, ERP No. D-DOE-D09801-WV, Western Greenbier Co-
Production Demonstration Project, Construction and Demonstration of a
98 megawatt (MWe) Net Power Plant and Ash Byproduct Manufacturing
Facility, Rainelle, WV. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns
about water resource impacts, coal refuse pile restoration activity,
and ash management. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060247, ERP No. DS-FTA-E40775-FL, Miami North Corridor
Project, Updated Information, Transit Improvement between NW 62 Street
at Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Station and NW 215th Street at the Dade/
Broward Counties Line, Funding, Dade County, FL. Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about noise and contamination impacts as well as
impacts related to relocations. In addition, EPA recommends that
mitigation measures be documented in the FEIS as project commitments.
Rating EC2.
Final EIS's
EIS No. 20060491, ERP No. F1-FHW-L40194-WA, WA-167 Freeway Project,
Construction, from 161 (Meridan Street North) in the City of Puyallup
to the WA-509 Freeway in the City of Tacoma, Funding, U.S. Coast Guard,
NPDES, U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Cities of Puyallup,
Fife, Edgewood, Milton, and Tacoma, Pierce County, WA. Summary: EPA
continues to have environmental concerns about loss of prime farmland,
and impacts to listed fish species, water quality, and wildlife habitat
connectivity. EPA has further concerns about noise, air toxics, and
environmental justice and tribal issues.
EIS No. 20060433, ERP No. F-NOA-L91027-00, Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fishery Management Plan, Proposed Acceptable Biological Catch and
Optimum Yield Specifications and Management Measures for the 2007-2008
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery and Amendment 16-4 Rebuilding Plans
for Seven Depleted Pacific Coast Groundfish Species, WA, OR and CA.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20060487, ERP No. F-AFS-K65315-CA, South Yuba Canal Maintenance
Project, Hazardous Trees Removal, Implementation, Tahoe National
Forest, Nevada County, CA. Summary: No formal comment letter was sent
to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20060489, ERP No. F-COE-F32198-00, Lock and Dam 3 Mississippi
River Navigation Safety and Embankments, To Reduce Related Navigation
Safety and Embankment Problems, Upper Mississippi River, Goodhue
County, MN and Pierce County, WI. Summary: EPA's original concerns
about proposed mitigation monitoring, water quality, and conclusions
with cumulative impact analysis have been adequately addressed;
therefore, we do not object to the proposed project.
EIS No. 20060504, ERP No. F-IBR-K39095-CA, South Delta Improvements
Program, To Improve Water Quality, Water Conveyance, and Fish Habitat
Conditions, Central Valley Project, U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit,
South Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, Several Counties, CA.
Summary: EPA supports the staged decision-making process between Stage
1 physical construction and Stage 2 operational actions. EPA provided
recommendations for Stage 2 analyses, and urged undertaking a public
process to scope key issues for the Stage 2 document. EPA emphasized
the need to evaluate, and avoid, water quality impacts of gate
operations and analysis of alternatives that meet the basic project
purpose as part of the continuing Clean Water Act permitting process.
EIS No. 20060511, ERP No. F-DOE-G03030-00, Strategic Petroleum Reserve
Expansion, Site Selection of Five New Sites: Chacahoula and Clovelly,
in Lafourche Parish, LA; Burinsburg, Claiborne County, MS; Richton,
Perry County, MS; and Stratton Ridge, Brazoria County, TX and Existing
Site Bayou Choctaw, Iberville Parish, LA, West Hackberry, Cameron and
Calcasieu Parishes, LA; and Big Hill, Jefferson County, TX. Summary: No
formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20060527, ERP No. F-AFS-F65065-WI, Long Rail Vegetation and
Transportation Management Project, Implementation, Eagle River-Florence
Ranger District, Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest, Florence and
Forest Counties, WI. Summary: The Final EIS addressed EPA's comments
relating to consistency with the Forest Management Plan; we support
continued monitoring of Regional Forester Sensitive Species as part of
the Forest's environmental management system. EPA does not object to
the proposed action.
Dated: January 30, 2007.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7-1728 Filed 2-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P