Final Bison and Elk Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement, 5078-5080 [E7-1605]
Download as PDF
5078
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 22 / Friday, February 2, 2007 / Notices
SYSTEM LOCATION:
HUD Headquarters and field offices.
CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE
SYSTEM:
HUD Headquarters, Office of the
Inspector General (OIG) and Field Office
Personnel; subjects of audits.
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Name, social security number, date of
birth, education, financial transactions,
medical history, and criminal or
employment history.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM:
Federal Managers Financial Integrity
Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97–255, HR 1526);
Sec. 113 of the Accounting and
Auditing Act of 1950 (31 U.S.C. 66a)
PURPOSE(S):
The purpose of the system of records
is audit resolution.
ROUTINE USERS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
In addition to those disclosures
generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.
552a(b) of the Privacy Act, other routine
uses are as follows:
(a) To the HUD OIG—to facilitate
audit resolution and U.S. Treasury—for
disbursements and adjustments thereof;
(b) To designated HUD users—to
facilitate audit resolution.
N/A. This is simply a tracking system
used to facilitate audit resolution.
Records are stored on electronic files
or magnetic tape/disc/drum.
RETRIEVABILITY:
Records may be retrieved by clicking
on Document Link which opens
document containing the personally
identifiable information.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
SAFEGUARDS EMPLOYED INCLUDE:
Background screening, limited
authorizations and access, security
guards; computer records are
maintained in secure areas with access
limited to authorized personnel and
technical restraints employed with
regard to accessing the records; access to
automated systems by authorized users
by passwords and code identification
cards.
16:13 Feb 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
The procedures for requesting
amendment or correction of records
appear in 24 CFR part 16. If additional
information or assistance is required,
contact the Privacy Act Appeals Officer,
Office of General Counsel, Department
of Housing and Urban Development,
451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20410
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Subject individuals; other
individuals; financial institutions,
private corporations or firms doing
business with HUD; Federal and nonFederal Governmental agencies; HUD
personnel.
None.
[FR Doc. E7–1752 Filed 2–1–07; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
STORAGE:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Individuals seeking to determine
whether this system of record contains
information about them, or those
seeking access to such records, should
address inquiries to the Assistant Chief
Financial Office Systems, Office of the
Chief Financial Officer, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410.
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
Are in accordance with GSA
schedules of retention and disposal.
System Manager(s)and address:
Assistant Chief Financial Officer for
NOTIFICATION AND RECORD ACCESS
PROCEDURES:
EXEMPTIONS FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE
ACT:
DISCLOSURE TO CONSUMER REPORTING
AGENCIES:
RETENTION AND DISPOSAL
Systems, Office of the Chief Financial
Officer, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20410.
Fish and Wildlife Service
Final Bison and Elk Management Plan
and Environmental Impact Statement
Fish and Wildlife Service,
National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and the National Park Service,
U.S. Department of the Interior, as lead
agencies, announce the fnal Bison and
Elk Management Plan (Plan) and
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the National Elk Refuge and Grand
Teton National Park/John D.
Rockefeller, Jr., Memorial Parkway
(Grand Teton National Park) is
available. The final Plan/EIS was
prepared pursuant to the National
Wildlife Refuge System Administration
Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C.
668dd, et. seq.); the National Park
Service Management Policies of 2006;
and the National Environmental Policy
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Act (NEPA). The final Plan/EIS was
prepared in cooperation with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS); the U.S. Department of
Agriculture Forest Service; the Bureau
of Land Management (BLM); and the
State of Wyoming Game and Fish
Department (WGFD). The final Plan/EIS
describes the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service’s and the National Park
Service’s proposal for management of
the Jackson bison and elk populations
within their respective jurisdictions for
15 years, beginning at the issuance of a
Record of Decision (ROD) on the final
Plan/EIS. The effects of six alternatives
for the management of bison and elk
populations for the National Elk Refuge
and Grand Teton National Park are
disclosed in the final Plan/EIS.
DATES: A ROD selecting the Preferred
Alternative for implementation of the
Bison and Elk Management Plan will be
signed by the Regional Directors for the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region
6) and the National Park Service
(Intermountain Region) no sooner than
30 days after the publication of this
notice. March 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To review or obtain a copy
of the final Plan/EIS, or to review public
comments and hearing testimony, see
‘‘Document Review’’ under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurie Shannon, Planning Team Leader,
Region 6, 134 Union Boulevard,
Lakewood, Colorado 80028, 303–236–
4317 (phone); 303–236–4792 (fax);
laurie_shannon@fws.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Elk Refuge and Grand Teton
National Park are located north of
Jackson, Wyoming. Together with the
Bridger-Teton National Forest, they
make up most of the southern half of the
Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. The
National Elk Refuge comprises
approximately 24,700 acres, Grand
Teton National Park comprises 309,995
acres, and the John D. Rockefeller Jr.,
Memorial Parkway is approximately
23,777 acres. The Jackson bison and elk
herds make up one of the largest
concentrations of free-ranging ungulates
in North America. Currently, these
herds number about 1,000 bison and
13,000 elk. The herds migrate across
several jurisdictional boundaries,
including Grand Teton National Park
and southern Yellowstone National
Park, Bridger-Teton National Forest,
BLM resource areas, and State and
private lands, before they winter
primarily on the National Elk Refuge.
Due to the wide range of authorities and
interests, including management of
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 22 / Friday, February 2, 2007 / Notices
resident wildlife by the State of
Wyoming on many federal lands, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
National Park Service have used a
cooperative approach to management
planning involving all of the associated
federal agencies and the WGFD.
A bison management plan (Jackson
Bison Herd Long Term Management
Plan and Environmental Assessment)
was developed by the National Park
Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, in cooperation with the WGFD
and the Bridger-Teton National Forest,
and finalized in September 1996. In
1998, a lawsuit was brought by the Fund
for Animals enjoining most federal
management actions proposed in the
1996 plan. The court ruled that the
destruction of bison on federal lands for
population control purposes could not
be carried out until additional NEPA
compliance was completed for those
actions. The court also directed that
additional NEPA compliance consider
the effects on the Jackson bison
population of the supplemental winterfeeding of elk on the National Elk
Refuge.
Significant issues addressed in the
final Plan/EIS include: Bison and elk
populations and their ecology;
restoration of habitat and management
of other species of wildlife;
supplemental winter feeding operations
of bison and elk; disease prevalence and
transmission; recreational opportunities;
cultural opportunities and western
traditions and lifestyles; commercial
operations; and the local and regional
economy.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
and the National Park Service, in
cooperation with the WGFD and the
other federal agencies, developed six
alternatives for the management of bison
and elk. These alternatives, as presented
in the final Plan/EIS, include:
Alternative 1—No Action; Alternative
2—Minimal Management of Habitat and
Populations, Support Migration;
Alternative 3—Restore Habitat, Support
Migration, and Phase Back
Supplemental Feeding; Alternative 4—
Adaptively Manage Habitat and
Populations; Alternative 5—Restore
Habitat, Improve Forage, and Continue
Supplemental Feeding; and Alternative
6—Restore Habitat, Adaptively Manage
Populations, and Phase Out
Supplemental Feeding.
Alternative 4, the agencies’ Preferred
Alternative in the final EIS, balances the
major issues and stakeholder
perspectives identified during the
planning process, with the purposes,
missions, and management policies of
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
the National Park Service. Assuming the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Feb 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
WGFD’s herd objective of 11,000 had
been met, and that higher numbers of
elk would use the winter range, the
agencies would recommend that
approximately 5,000 elk and 500 bison
winter on the National Elk Refuge at the
end of the first phase of
implementation. The elk hunt on the
National Elk Refuge, and elk herd
reductions as needed in Grand Teton
National Park would continue. A public
bison hunt would be instituted on the
National Elk Refuge and managed in
accordance with the State of Wyoming
licensing requirements and an approved
refuge hunting plan. As herd sizes and
objectives were achieved, further
reductions in feeding or elk numbers
could occur based on established
criteria developed in collaboration with
WGFD.
On July 21, 2005, the Fish and
Wildlife Service and the National Park
Service announced the availability of
the draft Plan/EIS for public review and
comment in the Federal Register (70 FR
42089–42090). During the public review
period, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and the National Park Service
held a series of public open houses and
formal hearings in Bozeman, Montana;
Jackson, Wyoming; and Riverton,
Wyoming, to allow public input on the
proposed management plan and its
alternatives. During the draft Plan/EIS
comment period that occurred from July
21, 2005 to November 7, 2005, the
agencies received more than 11,900
comments from 241 individuals (public
hearing testimony, letters, and e-mails);
37 agencies or organizations; and 1,751
form letters or petitions. Some of the
significant changes from the draft Plan/
EIS that resulted from public comments
include:
1. For all alternatives, the inclusion of
a statement clarifying the desired
conditions to be achieved by the end of
15-year plan. This statement briefly
describes what the agencies intend to
accomplish by implementing the plan.
The goals of the plan, which include
habitat conservation, sustainable
populations, numbers of elk and bison,
and disease management, would
essentially remain the same with minor
word changes to the sustainable
population goal for Grand Teton
National Park and the John D.
Rockefeller, Jr., Memorial Parkway.
2. Modification of Alternative 4
(Preferred Alternative) to emphasize
adaptive management of habitat and
populations. The agencies, in
cooperation with WGFD, would use
existing conditions, trends, new
research findings, and other changing
circumstances to provide the basis for
developing and implementing a
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5079
dynamic framework for decreasing the
need for supplemental food on the
National Elk Refuge. As modified,
Alternative 4 would not identify the
number of years supplemental feeding
would occur, but instead would
emphasize achievement of the desired
conditions by the end of the plan.
Alternative 4 would implement a
phased approach to reducing feeding,
but would not dictate a timeline for
phasing out or reducing feeding.
Following implementation of the first
phase, approximately 5,000 elk would
be expected to winter on the refuge. As
habitat objectives and herd sizes were
achieved, further reductions in feeding
or elk numbers could occur based on
established criteria developed in
collaboration with WGFD.
3. Target population for bison. Under
Alternative 4, the agencies would work
cooperatively with WGFD to maintain
and ensure a genetically viable
population of approximately 500 bison.
The target bison population in
Alternative 6 was modified to be about
500 animals instead of 400.
4. Modification of the bison hunt.
Under Alternative 4, a public bison hunt
on the refuge would be used to reduce
the bison population to approximately
500 animals in accordance with the
State of Wyoming licensing regulations
and an approved refuge hunting plan.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
could potentially allow for the removal
of a small number of bison by Native
American tribes for ceremonial
purposes, but unlike Alternative 3 and
6, it would not specify that it would be
provided.
5. Development of a framework and
criteria to reduce feeding. A key element
of the modified Alternative 4 would be
the development of a framework,
developed in collaboration with WGFD,
that would identify criteria necessary
for progressively transitioning from
intensive supplemental winter feeding
to greater reliance on free-standing
forage based on forage production, herd
sizes, effective mitigation of bison-elkcattle mingling on private lands, winter
distribution patterns of elk and bison,
prevalence of diseases, and public
support.
6. Mitigation of conflicts on adjacent
lands. Alternative 4 would adopt the
mitigation components of Alternative 6
to work with private and agency
partners to minimize conflicts with
adjacent landowners by providing
human and/or financial resources to
manage co-mingling and reduce crop
depredation by elk and/or bison on
private lands.
7. Vaccination of elk and bison.
Alternative 4, as modified, would
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
5080
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 22 / Friday, February 2, 2007 / Notices
accommodate WGFD vaccination of elk
and bison for brucellosis on the refuge
as long as it was logistically feasible and
safe for wildlife.
8. Public education component.
Alternative 4 would include the
initiation of a public education effort to
build understanding of natural elk and
bison behavior, ecology, distribution,
disease implications, and effects to
other species.
All substantive issues raised in the
comments were addressed in the final
Plan/EIS. Responses to comments are
included as a companion document to
the final Plan/EIS. Public comments and
hearing testimony are also available for
review at the National Elk Refuge
Headquarters, 675 East Broadway,
Jackson, Wyoming 83001, during
normal business hours. All information
provided voluntarily by mail, phone, or
at public meetings becomes part of the
official public record (i.e., names,
addresses, letters of comment, input
recorded during meetings). If requested
under the Freedom of Information Act
by a private citizen or organization, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service may
provide copies of such information.
The environmental review of this
project will be conducted in accordance
with the requirements of the NEPA Act
of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.); Council on Environmental Quality
NEPA Regulations); other appropriate
Federal laws and regulations; Executive
Order 12996; the National Wildlife
Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service policies and procedures for
compliance with those laws and
regulations.
Document Review
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Final Plan/EIS
A copy of the final Plan/EIS may be
obtained by writing to: Jackson Bison
and Elk Management Planning Office,
P.O. Box 510, Jackson, Wyoming 83001;
by telephone: 307–733–9212; by e-mail:
bisonelk_planning@fws.gov; or by
download from the project Web site:
https://bisonandelkplan.fws.gov.
The final Plan/EIS will be available
for reading at the following main branch
libraries: State of Wyoming: Albany
County—Laramie; Fremont County—
Dubois, Lander, and Riverton; Laramie
County—Cheyenne; Lincoln County—
Afton; Park County—Cody; Natrona
County—Casper; Sheridan County—
Sheridan; Sublette County—Pinedale
and Big Piney; Sweetwater County—
Rock Springs; and Teton County—
Jackson and Alta. State of Idaho: Idaho
Falls, Rexburg, Swan Valley and Victor.
State of Montana: Bozeman, Livingston,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:13 Feb 01, 2007
Jkt 211001
Missoula, and Ennis. State of Colorado:
Denver and Fort Collins. It will also be
available at the following colleges and
universities: State of Wyoming: Casper
College Library, Casper; Central
Wyoming College Library, Riverton;
University of Wyoming Library,
Laramie; Northwest College Library,
Powell; Sheridan College Library,
Sheridan; and Western Wyoming
College Library, Rock Springs. State of
Montana: Montana State University
Library, Bozeman; and the University of
Montana Library, Missoula. State of
Idaho: Albertsons Library, Boise State
University, Boise; University of Idaho
Library, Moscow. State of Colorado:
Colorado State University Library, Fort
Collins.
Dated: November 9, 2006.
James J. Slack,
Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, Denver,
Colorado.
[FR Doc. E7–1605 Filed 2–1–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Souris River Basin National Wildlife
Refuges, North Dakota
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service) announces that the
draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(CCP) and Environmental Assessment
(EA) for the Souris River Basin National
Wildlife Refuges (Refuges) is available.
This draft CCP/EA describes how the
Service intends to manage these Refuges
for the next 15 years. We request public
comment.
DATES: We must receive written
comments on the draft CCP/EA by
March 19, 2007. Submit comments by
one of the methods under ADDRESSES.
ADDRESSES: Please provide written
comments to Toni Griffin, Planning
Team Leader, Division of Refuge
Planning, Branch of Comprehensive
Conservation Planning, MountainPrairie Region, P.O. Box 25486, Denver
Federal Center, Denver, Colorado
80225–0486, or electronically to
toni_griffin@fws.gov. A copy of the CCP
may be obtained by writing to U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Division of Refuge
Planning, 134 Union Boulevard, Suite
300, Lakewood, Colorado 80228; or by
download from https://mountainprairie.fws.gov/planning.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Toni
Griffin, 303–236–4378 (phone); 303–
236–4792 (fax); toni_griffin@fws.gov
(e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Souris River Basin is home to three
national wildlife refuges: The Des Lacs
National Wildlife Refuge, located along
28 miles of the Des Lacs River; the J.
Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge,
located along 50 miles of the Souris
River; and the Upper Souris National
Wildlife Refuge, located along 35 miles
of the upper Souris River. The Refuges
are collectively known as the Souris
River Basin National Wildlife Refuges.
The Refuges were established by
Executive Order in 1935. The purpose of
each Refuge is for a ‘‘refuge and
breeding ground for migratory birds and
other wildlife.’’
The Refuges are located in a critical
area of the Central Flyway, providing
nesting and breeding habitat for
migrating and nesting waterfowl. The J.
Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge,
in particular, has developed into one of
the most important duck production
areas in the United States.
The American Bird Conservancy
recognizes all three Refuges as ‘‘Globally
Important Bird Areas.’’ In addition, J.
Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge is
designated as a regional shorebird site
in the ‘‘Western Hemisphere Shorebird
Reserve Network.’’ Lake Darling, located
on Upper Souris National Wildlife
Refuge, is designated as a critical habitat
for the federally threatened piping
plover.
Representing a comprehensive
collection of all North Dakota plant
communities, these Refuges could
contain the only remaining
representatives of drift plain prairie,
considered a threatened resource.
This draft CCP/EA identifies and
evaluates four alternatives for managing
the Refuges for the next 15 years.
Alternative A, the No Action alternative,
reflects the current management of the
Refuges. It provides the baseline against
which to compare the other alternatives.
Refuge habitats would continue to be
managed on an opportunistic schedule
that may maintain—or most likely
would result in further decline in—the
diversity of vegetation and wildlife
species. Des Lacs National Wildlife
Refuge and J. Clark Salyer National
Wildlife Refuge would continue to
perform only limited research and
would monitor only long-term
vegetation change. Upper Souris
National Wildlife Refuge would
continue to perform no scientific
research or monitoring. Outreach,
partnerships, and priority public uses
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 22 (Friday, February 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5078-5080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1605]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Final Bison and Elk Management Plan and Environmental Impact
Statement
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park
Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, as lead agencies, announce
the fnal Bison and Elk Management Plan (Plan) and Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the National Elk Refuge and Grand Teton National
Park/John D. Rockefeller, Jr., Memorial Parkway (Grand Teton National
Park) is available. The final Plan/EIS was prepared pursuant to the
National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as amended
(16 U.S.C. 668dd, et. seq.); the National Park Service Management
Policies of 2006; and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The
final Plan/EIS was prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of
Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS); the
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service; the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM); and the State of Wyoming Game and Fish Department
(WGFD). The final Plan/EIS describes the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service's and the National Park Service's proposal for management of
the Jackson bison and elk populations within their respective
jurisdictions for 15 years, beginning at the issuance of a Record of
Decision (ROD) on the final Plan/EIS. The effects of six alternatives
for the management of bison and elk populations for the National Elk
Refuge and Grand Teton National Park are disclosed in the final Plan/
EIS.
DATES: A ROD selecting the Preferred Alternative for implementation of
the Bison and Elk Management Plan will be signed by the Regional
Directors for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 6) and the
National Park Service (Intermountain Region) no sooner than 30 days
after the publication of this notice. March 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To review or obtain a copy of the final Plan/EIS, or to
review public comments and hearing testimony, see ``Document Review''
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurie Shannon, Planning Team Leader,
Region 6, 134 Union Boulevard, Lakewood, Colorado 80028, 303-236-4317
(phone); 303-236-4792 (fax); laurie_shannon@fws.gov (e-mail).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Elk Refuge and Grand Teton
National Park are located north of Jackson, Wyoming. Together with the
Bridger-Teton National Forest, they make up most of the southern half
of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. The National Elk Refuge comprises
approximately 24,700 acres, Grand Teton National Park comprises 309,995
acres, and the John D. Rockefeller Jr., Memorial Parkway is
approximately 23,777 acres. The Jackson bison and elk herds make up one
of the largest concentrations of free-ranging ungulates in North
America. Currently, these herds number about 1,000 bison and 13,000
elk. The herds migrate across several jurisdictional boundaries,
including Grand Teton National Park and southern Yellowstone National
Park, Bridger-Teton National Forest, BLM resource areas, and State and
private lands, before they winter primarily on the National Elk Refuge.
Due to the wide range of authorities and interests, including
management of
[[Page 5079]]
resident wildlife by the State of Wyoming on many federal lands, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service have used
a cooperative approach to management planning involving all of the
associated federal agencies and the WGFD.
A bison management plan (Jackson Bison Herd Long Term Management
Plan and Environmental Assessment) was developed by the National Park
Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in cooperation with the
WGFD and the Bridger-Teton National Forest, and finalized in September
1996. In 1998, a lawsuit was brought by the Fund for Animals enjoining
most federal management actions proposed in the 1996 plan. The court
ruled that the destruction of bison on federal lands for population
control purposes could not be carried out until additional NEPA
compliance was completed for those actions. The court also directed
that additional NEPA compliance consider the effects on the Jackson
bison population of the supplemental winter-feeding of elk on the
National Elk Refuge.
Significant issues addressed in the final Plan/EIS include: Bison
and elk populations and their ecology; restoration of habitat and
management of other species of wildlife; supplemental winter feeding
operations of bison and elk; disease prevalence and transmission;
recreational opportunities; cultural opportunities and western
traditions and lifestyles; commercial operations; and the local and
regional economy.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service,
in cooperation with the WGFD and the other federal agencies, developed
six alternatives for the management of bison and elk. These
alternatives, as presented in the final Plan/EIS, include: Alternative
1--No Action; Alternative 2--Minimal Management of Habitat and
Populations, Support Migration; Alternative 3--Restore Habitat, Support
Migration, and Phase Back Supplemental Feeding; Alternative 4--
Adaptively Manage Habitat and Populations; Alternative 5--Restore
Habitat, Improve Forage, and Continue Supplemental Feeding; and
Alternative 6--Restore Habitat, Adaptively Manage Populations, and
Phase Out Supplemental Feeding.
Alternative 4, the agencies' Preferred Alternative in the final
EIS, balances the major issues and stakeholder perspectives identified
during the planning process, with the purposes, missions, and
management policies of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
National Park Service. Assuming the WGFD's herd objective of 11,000 had
been met, and that higher numbers of elk would use the winter range,
the agencies would recommend that approximately 5,000 elk and 500 bison
winter on the National Elk Refuge at the end of the first phase of
implementation. The elk hunt on the National Elk Refuge, and elk herd
reductions as needed in Grand Teton National Park would continue. A
public bison hunt would be instituted on the National Elk Refuge and
managed in accordance with the State of Wyoming licensing requirements
and an approved refuge hunting plan. As herd sizes and objectives were
achieved, further reductions in feeding or elk numbers could occur
based on established criteria developed in collaboration with WGFD.
On July 21, 2005, the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National
Park Service announced the availability of the draft Plan/EIS for
public review and comment in the Federal Register (70 FR 42089-42090).
During the public review period, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
the National Park Service held a series of public open houses and
formal hearings in Bozeman, Montana; Jackson, Wyoming; and Riverton,
Wyoming, to allow public input on the proposed management plan and its
alternatives. During the draft Plan/EIS comment period that occurred
from July 21, 2005 to November 7, 2005, the agencies received more than
11,900 comments from 241 individuals (public hearing testimony,
letters, and e-mails); 37 agencies or organizations; and 1,751 form
letters or petitions. Some of the significant changes from the draft
Plan/EIS that resulted from public comments include:
1. For all alternatives, the inclusion of a statement clarifying
the desired conditions to be achieved by the end of 15-year plan. This
statement briefly describes what the agencies intend to accomplish by
implementing the plan. The goals of the plan, which include habitat
conservation, sustainable populations, numbers of elk and bison, and
disease management, would essentially remain the same with minor word
changes to the sustainable population goal for Grand Teton National
Park and the John D. Rockefeller, Jr., Memorial Parkway.
2. Modification of Alternative 4 (Preferred Alternative) to
emphasize adaptive management of habitat and populations. The agencies,
in cooperation with WGFD, would use existing conditions, trends, new
research findings, and other changing circumstances to provide the
basis for developing and implementing a dynamic framework for
decreasing the need for supplemental food on the National Elk Refuge.
As modified, Alternative 4 would not identify the number of years
supplemental feeding would occur, but instead would emphasize
achievement of the desired conditions by the end of the plan.
Alternative 4 would implement a phased approach to reducing feeding,
but would not dictate a timeline for phasing out or reducing feeding.
Following implementation of the first phase, approximately 5,000 elk
would be expected to winter on the refuge. As habitat objectives and
herd sizes were achieved, further reductions in feeding or elk numbers
could occur based on established criteria developed in collaboration
with WGFD.
3. Target population for bison. Under Alternative 4, the agencies
would work cooperatively with WGFD to maintain and ensure a genetically
viable population of approximately 500 bison. The target bison
population in Alternative 6 was modified to be about 500 animals
instead of 400.
4. Modification of the bison hunt. Under Alternative 4, a public
bison hunt on the refuge would be used to reduce the bison population
to approximately 500 animals in accordance with the State of Wyoming
licensing regulations and an approved refuge hunting plan. The U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service could potentially allow for the removal of a
small number of bison by Native American tribes for ceremonial
purposes, but unlike Alternative 3 and 6, it would not specify that it
would be provided.
5. Development of a framework and criteria to reduce feeding. A key
element of the modified Alternative 4 would be the development of a
framework, developed in collaboration with WGFD, that would identify
criteria necessary for progressively transitioning from intensive
supplemental winter feeding to greater reliance on free-standing forage
based on forage production, herd sizes, effective mitigation of bison-
elk-cattle mingling on private lands, winter distribution patterns of
elk and bison, prevalence of diseases, and public support.
6. Mitigation of conflicts on adjacent lands. Alternative 4 would
adopt the mitigation components of Alternative 6 to work with private
and agency partners to minimize conflicts with adjacent landowners by
providing human and/or financial resources to manage co-mingling and
reduce crop depredation by elk and/or bison on private lands.
7. Vaccination of elk and bison. Alternative 4, as modified, would
[[Page 5080]]
accommodate WGFD vaccination of elk and bison for brucellosis on the
refuge as long as it was logistically feasible and safe for wildlife.
8. Public education component. Alternative 4 would include the
initiation of a public education effort to build understanding of
natural elk and bison behavior, ecology, distribution, disease
implications, and effects to other species.
All substantive issues raised in the comments were addressed in the
final Plan/EIS. Responses to comments are included as a companion
document to the final Plan/EIS. Public comments and hearing testimony
are also available for review at the National Elk Refuge Headquarters,
675 East Broadway, Jackson, Wyoming 83001, during normal business
hours. All information provided voluntarily by mail, phone, or at
public meetings becomes part of the official public record (i.e.,
names, addresses, letters of comment, input recorded during meetings).
If requested under the Freedom of Information Act by a private citizen
or organization, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service may provide copies
of such information.
The environmental review of this project will be conducted in
accordance with the requirements of the NEPA Act of 1969, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.); Council on Environmental Quality NEPA
Regulations); other appropriate Federal laws and regulations; Executive
Order 12996; the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of
1997; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service policies and procedures for
compliance with those laws and regulations.
Document Review
Final Plan/EIS
A copy of the final Plan/EIS may be obtained by writing to: Jackson
Bison and Elk Management Planning Office, P.O. Box 510, Jackson,
Wyoming 83001; by telephone: 307-733-9212; by e-mail: bisonelk_planning@fws.gov; or by download from the project Web site:
https://bisonandelkplan.fws.gov.
The final Plan/EIS will be available for reading at the following
main branch libraries: State of Wyoming: Albany County--Laramie;
Fremont County--Dubois, Lander, and Riverton; Laramie County--Cheyenne;
Lincoln County--Afton; Park County--Cody; Natrona County--Casper;
Sheridan County--Sheridan; Sublette County--Pinedale and Big Piney;
Sweetwater County--Rock Springs; and Teton County--Jackson and Alta.
State of Idaho: Idaho Falls, Rexburg, Swan Valley and Victor. State of
Montana: Bozeman, Livingston, Missoula, and Ennis. State of Colorado:
Denver and Fort Collins. It will also be available at the following
colleges and universities: State of Wyoming: Casper College Library,
Casper; Central Wyoming College Library, Riverton; University of
Wyoming Library, Laramie; Northwest College Library, Powell; Sheridan
College Library, Sheridan; and Western Wyoming College Library, Rock
Springs. State of Montana: Montana State University Library, Bozeman;
and the University of Montana Library, Missoula. State of Idaho:
Albertsons Library, Boise State University, Boise; University of Idaho
Library, Moscow. State of Colorado: Colorado State University Library,
Fort Collins.
Dated: November 9, 2006.
James J. Slack,
Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, Denver, Colorado.
[FR Doc. E7-1605 Filed 2-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P