Marine Mammals; Pinniped Removal Authority, 4239-4241 [E7-1447]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. III. After notice and opportunity for comment as provided in section 766.23 of the Regulations, any other person, firm, corporation, or business organization related to Fernando Sero by affiliation, ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of this Order. IV. This Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin technology. V. This Order is effective immediately and shall remain in effect until December 15, 2015. VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the Regulations, Sero may file an appeal of this Order with the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security. The appeal must be filed within 45 days from the date of this Order and must comply with the provisions of Part 756 of the Regulations. VII. A copy of this Order shall be delivered to Sero. This Order shall be published in the Federal Register. Washington, and Idaho requesting authorization to intentionally take, by lethal methods, individually identifiable California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) that prey on Pacific salmon and steelhead (Onchorhynchus spp.) listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) in the Columbia River in Washington and Oregon. This authorization is requested as part of a larger effort to protect and recover listed salmonid stocks in the river. NMFS has determined that the application contains sufficient information to warrant convening a Pinniped-Fishery Interaction Task Force (Task Force), which will be established after the close of the public comment period. NMFS solicits public comments on the application, other information related to pinniped predation on salmonids at Bonneville Dam, and nominations for potential members of the Task Force. DATES: Comments and information must be received by April 2, 2007. ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to Assistant Regional Administrator, Protected Resources Division, NMFS, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232. Comment may also be submitted by email to SeaLion.Predation@noaa.gov or by fax to 301–427–2527. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Garth Griffin, (503) 231–2005, or Tom Eagle, (301) 713–2322, ext. 105. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: January 22, 2007. Eileen M. Albanese, Director, Office of Exporter Services. [FR Doc. 07–390 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am] The states’ application and background information on pinniped predation on listed salmonids, and nonlethal efforts to address the predation, are available via the Internet at the following address: https:// www.nwr.noaa.gov. BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M Electronic Access DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Statutory Authority National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Section 120 of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361, et seq.) allows the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries (Assistant Administrator), NMFS, to authorize the intentional lethal taking of individually identifiable pinnipeds that are having a significant negative impact on the decline or recovery of salmonids that are listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The authorization applies only to pinnipeds that are not listed under the ESA, or designated as a depleted or strategic stock under the MMPA. Pursuant to section 120(b) and (c), applicants may request authorization to [I.D. 121406B] Marine Mammals; Pinniped Removal Authority National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: NMFS received an application under Section 120 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) from the states of Oregon, VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:36 Jan 29, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4239 lethally remove pinnipeds, and the Assistant Administrator is required to: (1) Review the application to determine whether the applicant has produced sufficient evidence to warrant establishing a Pinniped-Fishery Interaction Task Force (Task Force); (2) Establish the Task Force and publish a notice in the Federal Register requesting public comment on the application if sufficient evidence has been produced; (3) Consider any recommendations made by the Task Force in making a determination whether to approve or deny the application; and (4) If approved, immediately takes steps to implement the intentional lethal taking, which shall be performed by Federal or state agencies, or qualified individuals under contract to such agencies. The Task Force is required to be comprised of the following: (1) NMFS/ NOAA staff, (2) scientists who are knowledgeable about the pinniped interaction, (3) representatives of affected conservation and fishing community organizations, (4) treaty Indian tribes, (5) the states, and (6) such other organizations as NMFS deems appropriate. The Task Force reviews the application, other background information, and public comments and, as required by statute, recommends to NMFS whether to approve or deny the application. The Task Force is also required to submit with its recommendation, a description of the specific pinniped individual or individuals, the proposed location, time, and method of such taking, criteria for evaluating the success of the action, the duration of the intentional lethal taking authority, and a suggestion for non-lethal alternatives, if available and practicable, including a recommended course of action. Background On December 5, 2006, NMFS received an application co-signed by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) requesting authorization to intentionally take, by lethal methods, individually identifiable California sea lions in the Columbia River, which are having a significant negative impact on the recovery of threatened and endangered Pacific salmon and steelhead. According to the states’ application, impacted salmon and steelhead include Lower Columbia River Chinook (threatened), Lower Columbia River steelhead (threatened), Middle Columbia River steelhead E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES 4240 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices (threatened), Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook (endangered), Snake River Spring/Summer Chinook (threatened), Snake River Basin steelhead (threatened), Upper Willamette Chinook (threatened), and Upper Willamette steelhead (threatened). The states requested that NMFS establish a Pinniped-Fishery Interaction Task Force and initiate the process provided by Section 120 of the MMPA. The states’ application references studies conducted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Fisheries Field Unit that document when pinniped predation occurs in the Bonneville Dam tailrace, numbers of pinnipeds present, numbers of individual sea lions observed, numbers of salmonids consumed, and the proportion of all salmonids passing Bonneville that are taken by pinnipeds foraging in the tailrace of the dam. Information from the study, begun in 2002 and continuing through 2006, indicates that predation increased from an estimated 1,010 salmonids (0.35 percent of the salmonids passing the dam) in 2002 to an estimated 2,920 salmonids (3.44 percent of the salmonids passing the dam) in 2005. In 2006, an estimated 3,023 salmonids (2.80 percent of the total return) were consumed by sea lions immediately below the dam. Pinniped predation estimates at the dam represent a minimum lower bound on the total river-wide predation because they apply only to the area immediately below the dam (less than 0.5 miles from the structure). California sea lions, however, have been documented by WDFW/ ODFW (unpublished data) feeding on salmonids immediately below Bonneville to navigation Marker 85 (approximately 6 miles downstream) and throughout the lower Columbia River. During the spring salmon return in 2005 and 2006, the Corps, NMFS, ODFW, and WDFW tried to deter sea lions from foraging on salmon and steelhead in the dam’s fish passage facilities and tailrace area. Although the Corps prevented sea lions from entering the dam’s fish passage system, the agencies’ collective non-lethal deterrence efforts have done little to reduce predation of salmon and steelhead in the tailrace area. While a more intensive non-lethal hazing program is planned by Oregon and Washington in 2007, the states noted they must also pursue the MMPA option for lethal removal. The states propose to lethally remove a limited number of California sea lions above Columbia River Navigation VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:36 Jan 29, 2007 Jkt 211001 Marker 85 (approximately river mile 139.5), annually from January 1 to June 30. Any lethal removal activity would be preceded by a period of non-lethal deterrent activity (e.g., acoustic and tactile harassment) and followed by an evaluation period. Under the proposal, this incremental process (i.e., non-lethal deterrence followed by lethal removal and an evaluation period) would be repeated as necessary. In addition to animals located above Marker 85, all individually marked California sea lions that have been documented feeding on salmonids at Bonneville Dam would be candidates for removal without restriction to time or location in the river. Lethal removals in the first year of the proposed authorization is proposed to be less than one percent of the Potential Biological Removal (PBR) level for California sea lions (current PBR level is 8,333 animals out of an estimated population of 237,000); the number proposed to be removed in subsequent years is anticipated to be lower and would likely approach zero within several years. Individual sea lions would be lethally removed by humane methods following recommendations of a Safety and Animal Care committees convened by the states. The proposed action to address pinniped predation is part of a comprehensive fish recovery strategy. As reported in the application, significant actions to address the decline of salmon populations in the Columbia River basin have been underway for several decades and are progressing each year as a result of development and implementation of ESA conservation and recovery plans throughout the basin. These actions include harvest reductions, hydroelectric system mitigation, watershed and sub-basin planning, and hatchery reform. The applicants state that continued use of only non-lethal methods will likely result in an expansion of the problem by allowing increasing numbers of sea lions to become recruited into the pool of nuisance animals. The expected benefit of permanent removal of the animals in question will be to reduce a recent significant source of mortality that has affected the states’ ongoing efforts to recover ESA listed salmonids in the Columbia River Basin. In considering whether the application should be approved or denied, the MMPA requires that the Task Force and NMFS consider: (1) Population trends, feeding habits, the location of the pinniped interaction, how and when the interaction occurs, PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and how many individual pinnipeds are involved; (2) Past efforts to deter such pinnipeds, and whether the applicant has demonstrated that no feasible and prudent alternatives exist and that the applicant has taken all reasonable nonlethal steps without success; (3) The extent to which such pinnipeds are causing undue injury impact to, or imbalance with, other species in the ecosystem, including fish populations; and (4) The extent to which such pinnipeds are exhibiting behavior that presents an ongoing threat to public safety. The Assistant Administrator has considered the states’ application and determined that it provides sufficient evidence to warrant establishing a Task Force. The application describes the means of identifying individual pinnipeds, includes a detailed description of the problem interactions between pinnipeds and listed salmonids at and below Bonneville Dam, and describes the expected benefits of potential taking of pinnipeds. The application also documents past nonlethal efforts to prevent the problem interactions. Request for Comments and Other Information NMFS solicits public comments on the states’ application and any additional information that should be considered by the Task Force in making its recommendation, or NMFS in making its determination whether to approve or deny the application. NMFS is interested in receiving additional information related to the factors that must be considered in determining whether to approve or deny the application (see Background) and on the impact of sea lion predation at Bonneville Dam on the affected salmonid populations. NMFS requests that comments be specific. In particular, we request information regarding: (1) Observations of sea lions (number, species and predation on salmonids) in the Columbia River above or below Bonneville Dam; (2) Information on areas where numbers of sea lions are concentrated in the lower Columbia River, between Tongue Point (river mile 16) and Navigation Marker 85 (river mile 135), including resting (haulout) sites and locations where sea lions have been repeatedly observed taking salmonids; and (3) Dates when sea lions have been observed in the river above Tongue Point to Bonneville Dam. E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices NMFS also solicits the names and affiliations of experts from the academic and scientific community, tribes, Federal and state agencies, and the private sector for consideration as potential Task Force members. A Task Force, established under MMPA section 120 must, to the maximum extent practicable, consist of an equitable balance among representatives of resource users and non-users as outlined above. The cover letter to the states’ application included a list of suggested agencies and organizations for inclusion in the Task Force (see Electronic Access). Nominations for Task Force membership must include sufficient background information (e.g., 1–page resume) on the candidate to allow us to judge their expertise and should indicate the prospective candidate’s willingness to serve without compensation. Dated: January 23, 2007. Samuel D. Rauch III, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E7–1447 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [I.D. 012407A] Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of public meetings. ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (Council), its Bycatch/Limited Access Privilege Program (LAPP) Committee, its Ecosystem Committee, its Tilefish Committee, its Executive Committee, and its Law Enforcement Committee will hold public meetings. DATES: The meetings will be held on Tuesday, February 13, 2007 through Thursday, February 15, 2007. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific dates and times. ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at the Holiday Inn Select, 630 Naamans Rd., Claymont, DE; telephone: (302) 791–2700. Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 300 S. New Street, Dover, DE 19904. 15:36 Jan 29, 2007 Jkt 211001 Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council; telephone: (302) 674–2331, ext. 19. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 10 a.m. to 12 noon - The Bycatch/ LAPP Committee will meet. 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. - The Ecosystem Committee will meet. 4 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. - The Tilefish Committee with meet. Wednesday, February 14, 2007 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. - The Executive Committee will meet. 10 a.m. - The Council will convene, at which time Regular Council business will be conducted. The Council will receive a report on the outcome on the 44th Stock Assessment Review. 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. - The Council will review Framework 7 to the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan (FMP) [Meeting1]. 4 p.m. to 5 p.m. - The Council will meet to review and approve Amendment 14 to Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass FMP [Scup Rebuilding Plan]. Thursday, February 15, 2007 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration VerDate Aug<31>2005 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 8 a.m. to 9 a.m. - The Law Enforcement Committee will meet. 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. - The Council will convene and receive a presentation on Northeast Monitoring Program (NEAMAP). 10:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. - The Council will received an update from the South Atlantic Council regarding its SnapperGrouper FMP. 11 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - The Council will review and adopt Amendment 9 to Squid, Mackerel, Butterfish FMP. 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. - The Council will discuss Amendment 10 to the Squid, Mackerel, Butterfish FMP. 1:30 p.m. until adjournment - The Council will receive committee reports and address any continuing or new business. Agenda items for the Council’s committees and the Council itself are: The Bycatch/LAPP Committee will review and evaluate public comments on proposed Standardized Bycatch Reporting Methodology (SBRM) Amendment, discuss and develop a Council position regarding Secretarial submission of the SBRM Amendment, and review the reauthorized MagnusonStevens Act (MSA) LAPP charge. The Ecosystems Committee will discuss: NMFS perspective on liquified natural gas (LNG) facilities and PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4241 windmill farms, industry (Blue Water Wind) perspective on offshore energy sources, Ecosystem Approach to Fishery Management, reauthorized MSA study requirement for regional ecosystem based management and research, exclusive economic zone (EEZ) artificial reef management, Corps of Engineers (COE) permit conditions, and special management zones. The Tilefish Committee will review Fishery Management Action Team (FMAT) progress regarding Amendment 1 and provide guidance regarding future actions. The Executive Committee will review new requirements regarding the reauthorized MSA and associated timelines. As a minimum, the Committee will discuss the role of the Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) in future Council actions; discuss how best to integrate MSA and National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA); address overcapitalization and excess harvesting capacity; and, discuss the integration of cooperative research, experimental fishing permits and research set-aside (RSA). The Committee will also discuss utilization of Joint Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission/Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (ASMFC/MAFMC) advisors. When the Council convenes, it will conduct its regular business session and receive a report on the 44th Stock Assessment Review to include surfclams, ocean quahogs and skate. Meeting 1 of Framework 7 to Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass FMP will be held to review options/ alternatives regarding a mechanism to change biological reference points during the specification setting process following stock assessment reviews. The Council will then review and discuss public hearing and written comments concerning Amendment 14 to the Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass FMP [Scup Rebuilding Plan], decide and adopt final measures to be included in Amendment 14, and approve Amendment 14 for Secretarial submission. The Law Enforcement Committee will discuss enforcement priorities for the 2007 fishing year, address maritime security issues impacting the fishing industry, and develop list of potential actions for the Committee in 2007. The Council will receive a presentation on the NEAMAP and receive an update from the South Atlantic Council regarding its SnapperGrouper FMP. The Council will review and approve Amendment 9 to Squid, Mackerel, and Butterfish FMP for Secretarial submission. The Council E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4239-4241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1447]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 121406B]


Marine Mammals; Pinniped Removal Authority

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS received an application under Section 120 of the Marine 
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) from the states of Oregon, Washington, and 
Idaho requesting authorization to intentionally take, by lethal 
methods, individually identifiable California sea lions (Zalophus 
californianus) that prey on Pacific salmon and steelhead (Onchorhynchus 
spp.) listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species 
Act (ESA) in the Columbia River in Washington and Oregon. This 
authorization is requested as part of a larger effort to protect and 
recover listed salmonid stocks in the river. NMFS has determined that 
the application contains sufficient information to warrant convening a 
Pinniped-Fishery Interaction Task Force (Task Force), which will be 
established after the close of the public comment period. NMFS solicits 
public comments on the application, other information related to 
pinniped predation on salmonids at Bonneville Dam, and nominations for 
potential members of the Task Force.

DATES: Comments and information must be received by April 2, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to Assistant 
Regional Administrator, Protected Resources Division, NMFS, 1201 NE 
Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232. Comment may also be 
submitted by email to SeaLion.Predation@noaa.gov or by fax to 301-427-
2527.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Garth Griffin, (503) 231-2005, or Tom 
Eagle, (301) 713-2322, ext. 105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access

    The states' application and background information on pinniped 
predation on listed salmonids, and non-lethal efforts to address the 
predation, are available via the Internet at the following address: 
https://www.nwr.noaa.gov.

Statutory Authority

    Section 120 of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361, et seq.) allows the 
Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Assistant Administrator for 
Fisheries (Assistant Administrator), NMFS, to authorize the intentional 
lethal taking of individually identifiable pinnipeds that are having a 
significant negative impact on the decline or recovery of salmonids 
that are listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered 
Species Act (ESA). The authorization applies only to pinnipeds that are 
not listed under the ESA, or designated as a depleted or strategic 
stock under the MMPA. Pursuant to section 120(b) and (c), applicants 
may request authorization to lethally remove pinnipeds, and the 
Assistant Administrator is required to:
    (1) Review the application to determine whether the applicant has 
produced sufficient evidence to warrant establishing a Pinniped-Fishery 
Interaction Task Force (Task Force);
    (2) Establish the Task Force and publish a notice in the Federal 
Register requesting public comment on the application if sufficient 
evidence has been produced;
    (3) Consider any recommendations made by the Task Force in making a 
determination whether to approve or deny the application; and
    (4) If approved, immediately takes steps to implement the 
intentional lethal taking, which shall be performed by Federal or state 
agencies, or qualified individuals under contract to such agencies.
    The Task Force is required to be comprised of the following: (1) 
NMFS/NOAA staff, (2) scientists who are knowledgeable about the 
pinniped interaction, (3) representatives of affected conservation and 
fishing community organizations, (4) treaty Indian tribes, (5) the 
states, and (6) such other organizations as NMFS deems appropriate. The 
Task Force reviews the application, other background information, and 
public comments and, as required by statute, recommends to NMFS whether 
to approve or deny the application. The Task Force is also required to 
submit with its recommendation, a description of the specific pinniped 
individual or individuals, the proposed location, time, and method of 
such taking, criteria for evaluating the success of the action, the 
duration of the intentional lethal taking authority, and a suggestion 
for non-lethal alternatives, if available and practicable, including a 
recommended course of action.

Background

    On December 5, 2006, NMFS received an application co-signed by the 
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), the Oregon 
Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the Idaho Department of Fish 
and Game (IDFG) requesting authorization to intentionally take, by 
lethal methods, individually identifiable California sea lions in the 
Columbia River, which are having a significant negative impact on the 
recovery of threatened and endangered Pacific salmon and steelhead. 
According to the states' application, impacted salmon and steelhead 
include Lower Columbia River Chinook (threatened), Lower Columbia River 
steelhead (threatened), Middle Columbia River steelhead

[[Page 4240]]

(threatened), Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook (endangered), Snake 
River Spring/Summer Chinook (threatened), Snake River Basin steelhead 
(threatened), Upper Willamette Chinook (threatened), and Upper 
Willamette steelhead (threatened). The states requested that NMFS 
establish a Pinniped-Fishery Interaction Task Force and initiate the 
process provided by Section 120 of the MMPA.
    The states' application references studies conducted by the U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Fisheries Field Unit that document when 
pinniped predation occurs in the Bonneville Dam tailrace, numbers of 
pinnipeds present, numbers of individual sea lions observed, numbers of 
salmonids consumed, and the proportion of all salmonids passing 
Bonneville that are taken by pinnipeds foraging in the tailrace of the 
dam. Information from the study, begun in 2002 and continuing through 
2006, indicates that predation increased from an estimated 1,010 
salmonids (0.35 percent of the salmonids passing the dam) in 2002 to an 
estimated 2,920 salmonids (3.44 percent of the salmonids passing the 
dam) in 2005. In 2006, an estimated 3,023 salmonids (2.80 percent of 
the total return) were consumed by sea lions immediately below the dam. 
Pinniped predation estimates at the dam represent a minimum lower bound 
on the total river-wide predation because they apply only to the area 
immediately below the dam (less than 0.5 miles from the structure). 
California sea lions, however, have been documented by WDFW/ODFW 
(unpublished data) feeding on salmonids immediately below Bonneville to 
navigation Marker 85 (approximately 6 miles downstream) and throughout 
the lower Columbia River.
    During the spring salmon return in 2005 and 2006, the Corps, NMFS, 
ODFW, and WDFW tried to deter sea lions from foraging on salmon and 
steelhead in the dam's fish passage facilities and tailrace area. 
Although the Corps prevented sea lions from entering the dam's fish 
passage system, the agencies' collective non-lethal deterrence efforts 
have done little to reduce predation of salmon and steelhead in the 
tailrace area. While a more intensive non-lethal hazing program is 
planned by Oregon and Washington in 2007, the states noted they must 
also pursue the MMPA option for lethal removal.
    The states propose to lethally remove a limited number of 
California sea lions above Columbia River Navigation Marker 85 
(approximately river mile 139.5), annually from January 1 to June 30. 
Any lethal removal activity would be preceded by a period of non-lethal 
deterrent activity (e.g., acoustic and tactile harassment) and followed 
by an evaluation period. Under the proposal, this incremental process 
(i.e., non-lethal deterrence followed by lethal removal and an 
evaluation period) would be repeated as necessary. In addition to 
animals located above Marker 85, all individually marked California sea 
lions that have been documented feeding on salmonids at Bonneville Dam 
would be candidates for removal without restriction to time or location 
in the river. Lethal removals in the first year of the proposed 
authorization is proposed to be less than one percent of the Potential 
Biological Removal (PBR) level for California sea lions (current PBR 
level is 8,333 animals out of an estimated population of 237,000); the 
number proposed to be removed in subsequent years is anticipated to be 
lower and would likely approach zero within several years. Individual 
sea lions would be lethally removed by humane methods following 
recommendations of a Safety and Animal Care committees convened by the 
states.
    The proposed action to address pinniped predation is part of a 
comprehensive fish recovery strategy. As reported in the application, 
significant actions to address the decline of salmon populations in the 
Columbia River basin have been underway for several decades and are 
progressing each year as a result of development and implementation of 
ESA conservation and recovery plans throughout the basin. These actions 
include harvest reductions, hydroelectric system mitigation, watershed 
and sub-basin planning, and hatchery reform.
    The applicants state that continued use of only non-lethal methods 
will likely result in an expansion of the problem by allowing 
increasing numbers of sea lions to become recruited into the pool of 
nuisance animals. The expected benefit of permanent removal of the 
animals in question will be to reduce a recent significant source of 
mortality that has affected the states' ongoing efforts to recover ESA 
listed salmonids in the Columbia River Basin.
    In considering whether the application should be approved or 
denied, the MMPA requires that the Task Force and NMFS consider:
    (1) Population trends, feeding habits, the location of the pinniped 
interaction, how and when the interaction occurs, and how many 
individual pinnipeds are involved;
    (2) Past efforts to deter such pinnipeds, and whether the applicant 
has demonstrated that no feasible and prudent alternatives exist and 
that the applicant has taken all reasonable nonlethal steps without 
success;
    (3) The extent to which such pinnipeds are causing undue injury 
impact to, or imbalance with, other species in the ecosystem, including 
fish populations; and
    (4) The extent to which such pinnipeds are exhibiting behavior that 
presents an ongoing threat to public safety.
    The Assistant Administrator has considered the states' application 
and determined that it provides sufficient evidence to warrant 
establishing a Task Force. The application describes the means of 
identifying individual pinnipeds, includes a detailed description of 
the problem interactions between pinnipeds and listed salmonids at and 
below Bonneville Dam, and describes the expected benefits of potential 
taking of pinnipeds. The application also documents past non-lethal 
efforts to prevent the problem interactions.

Request for Comments and Other Information

    NMFS solicits public comments on the states' application and any 
additional information that should be considered by the Task Force in 
making its recommendation, or NMFS in making its determination whether 
to approve or deny the application. NMFS is interested in receiving 
additional information related to the factors that must be considered 
in determining whether to approve or deny the application (see 
Background) and on the impact of sea lion predation at Bonneville Dam 
on the affected salmonid populations.
    NMFS requests that comments be specific. In particular, we request 
information regarding:
    (1) Observations of sea lions (number, species and predation on 
salmonids) in the Columbia River above or below Bonneville Dam;
    (2) Information on areas where numbers of sea lions are 
concentrated in the lower Columbia River, between Tongue Point (river 
mile 16) and Navigation Marker 85 (river mile 135), including resting 
(haulout) sites and locations where sea lions have been repeatedly 
observed taking salmonids; and
    (3) Dates when sea lions have been observed in the river above 
Tongue Point to Bonneville Dam.

[[Page 4241]]

    NMFS also solicits the names and affiliations of experts from the 
academic and scientific community, tribes, Federal and state agencies, 
and the private sector for consideration as potential Task Force 
members. A Task Force, established under MMPA section 120 must, to the 
maximum extent practicable, consist of an equitable balance among 
representatives of resource users and non-users as outlined above. The 
cover letter to the states' application included a list of suggested 
agencies and organizations for inclusion in the Task Force (see 
Electronic Access). Nominations for Task Force membership must include 
sufficient background information (e.g., 1-page resume) on the 
candidate to allow us to judge their expertise and should indicate the 
prospective candidate's willingness to serve without compensation.

    Dated: January 23, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-1447 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.