Marine Mammals; Pinniped Removal Authority, 4239-4241 [E7-1447]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
III. After notice and opportunity for
comment as provided in section 766.23
of the Regulations, any other person,
firm, corporation, or business
organization related to Fernando Sero
by affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of this
Order.
IV. This Order does not prohibit any
export, reexport, or other transaction
subject to the Regulations where the
only items involved that are subject to
the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin
technology.
V. This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect until
December 15, 2015.
VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the
Regulations, Sero may file an appeal of
this Order with the Under Secretary of
Commerce for Industry and Security.
The appeal must be filed within 45 days
from the date of this Order and must
comply with the provisions of Part 756
of the Regulations.
VII. A copy of this Order shall be
delivered to Sero. This Order shall be
published in the Federal Register.
Washington, and Idaho requesting
authorization to intentionally take, by
lethal methods, individually identifiable
California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus) that prey on Pacific
salmon and steelhead (Onchorhynchus
spp.) listed as threatened or endangered
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) in the Columbia River in
Washington and Oregon. This
authorization is requested as part of a
larger effort to protect and recover listed
salmonid stocks in the river. NMFS has
determined that the application
contains sufficient information to
warrant convening a Pinniped-Fishery
Interaction Task Force (Task Force),
which will be established after the close
of the public comment period. NMFS
solicits public comments on the
application, other information related to
pinniped predation on salmonids at
Bonneville Dam, and nominations for
potential members of the Task Force.
DATES: Comments and information must
be received by April 2, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the
application should be addressed to
Assistant Regional Administrator,
Protected Resources Division, NMFS,
1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100,
Portland, OR 97232. Comment may also
be submitted by email to
SeaLion.Predation@noaa.gov or by fax
to 301–427–2527.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Garth Griffin, (503) 231–2005, or Tom
Eagle, (301) 713–2322, ext. 105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: January 22, 2007.
Eileen M. Albanese,
Director, Office of Exporter Services.
[FR Doc. 07–390 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am]
The states’ application and
background information on pinniped
predation on listed salmonids, and nonlethal efforts to address the predation,
are available via the Internet at the
following address: https://
www.nwr.noaa.gov.
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
Electronic Access
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Statutory Authority
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Section 120 of the MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1361, et seq.) allows the Secretary of
Commerce, acting through the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries (Assistant
Administrator), NMFS, to authorize the
intentional lethal taking of individually
identifiable pinnipeds that are having a
significant negative impact on the
decline or recovery of salmonids that
are listed as threatened or endangered
under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA). The authorization applies only to
pinnipeds that are not listed under the
ESA, or designated as a depleted or
strategic stock under the MMPA.
Pursuant to section 120(b) and (c),
applicants may request authorization to
[I.D. 121406B]
Marine Mammals; Pinniped Removal
Authority
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS received an
application under Section 120 of the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) from the states of Oregon,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4239
lethally remove pinnipeds, and the
Assistant Administrator is required to:
(1) Review the application to
determine whether the applicant has
produced sufficient evidence to warrant
establishing a Pinniped-Fishery
Interaction Task Force (Task Force);
(2) Establish the Task Force and
publish a notice in the Federal Register
requesting public comment on the
application if sufficient evidence has
been produced;
(3) Consider any recommendations
made by the Task Force in making a
determination whether to approve or
deny the application; and
(4) If approved, immediately takes
steps to implement the intentional
lethal taking, which shall be performed
by Federal or state agencies, or qualified
individuals under contract to such
agencies.
The Task Force is required to be
comprised of the following: (1) NMFS/
NOAA staff, (2) scientists who are
knowledgeable about the pinniped
interaction, (3) representatives of
affected conservation and fishing
community organizations, (4) treaty
Indian tribes, (5) the states, and (6) such
other organizations as NMFS deems
appropriate. The Task Force reviews the
application, other background
information, and public comments and,
as required by statute, recommends to
NMFS whether to approve or deny the
application. The Task Force is also
required to submit with its
recommendation, a description of the
specific pinniped individual or
individuals, the proposed location,
time, and method of such taking, criteria
for evaluating the success of the action,
the duration of the intentional lethal
taking authority, and a suggestion for
non-lethal alternatives, if available and
practicable, including a recommended
course of action.
Background
On December 5, 2006, NMFS received
an application co-signed by the
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife (WDFW), the Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife
(ODFW) and the Idaho Department of
Fish and Game (IDFG) requesting
authorization to intentionally take, by
lethal methods, individually identifiable
California sea lions in the Columbia
River, which are having a significant
negative impact on the recovery of
threatened and endangered Pacific
salmon and steelhead. According to the
states’ application, impacted salmon
and steelhead include Lower Columbia
River Chinook (threatened), Lower
Columbia River steelhead (threatened),
Middle Columbia River steelhead
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
4240
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
(threatened), Upper Columbia River
Spring Chinook (endangered), Snake
River Spring/Summer Chinook
(threatened), Snake River Basin
steelhead (threatened), Upper
Willamette Chinook (threatened), and
Upper Willamette steelhead
(threatened). The states requested that
NMFS establish a Pinniped-Fishery
Interaction Task Force and initiate the
process provided by Section 120 of the
MMPA.
The states’ application references
studies conducted by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) Fisheries
Field Unit that document when
pinniped predation occurs in the
Bonneville Dam tailrace, numbers of
pinnipeds present, numbers of
individual sea lions observed, numbers
of salmonids consumed, and the
proportion of all salmonids passing
Bonneville that are taken by pinnipeds
foraging in the tailrace of the dam.
Information from the study, begun in
2002 and continuing through 2006,
indicates that predation increased from
an estimated 1,010 salmonids (0.35
percent of the salmonids passing the
dam) in 2002 to an estimated 2,920
salmonids (3.44 percent of the
salmonids passing the dam) in 2005. In
2006, an estimated 3,023 salmonids
(2.80 percent of the total return) were
consumed by sea lions immediately
below the dam. Pinniped predation
estimates at the dam represent a
minimum lower bound on the total
river-wide predation because they apply
only to the area immediately below the
dam (less than 0.5 miles from the
structure). California sea lions, however,
have been documented by WDFW/
ODFW (unpublished data) feeding on
salmonids immediately below
Bonneville to navigation Marker 85
(approximately 6 miles downstream)
and throughout the lower Columbia
River.
During the spring salmon return in
2005 and 2006, the Corps, NMFS,
ODFW, and WDFW tried to deter sea
lions from foraging on salmon and
steelhead in the dam’s fish passage
facilities and tailrace area. Although the
Corps prevented sea lions from entering
the dam’s fish passage system, the
agencies’ collective non-lethal
deterrence efforts have done little to
reduce predation of salmon and
steelhead in the tailrace area. While a
more intensive non-lethal hazing
program is planned by Oregon and
Washington in 2007, the states noted
they must also pursue the MMPA option
for lethal removal.
The states propose to lethally remove
a limited number of California sea lions
above Columbia River Navigation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Marker 85 (approximately river mile
139.5), annually from January 1 to June
30. Any lethal removal activity would
be preceded by a period of non-lethal
deterrent activity (e.g., acoustic and
tactile harassment) and followed by an
evaluation period. Under the proposal,
this incremental process (i.e., non-lethal
deterrence followed by lethal removal
and an evaluation period) would be
repeated as necessary. In addition to
animals located above Marker 85, all
individually marked California sea lions
that have been documented feeding on
salmonids at Bonneville Dam would be
candidates for removal without
restriction to time or location in the
river. Lethal removals in the first year of
the proposed authorization is proposed
to be less than one percent of the
Potential Biological Removal (PBR) level
for California sea lions (current PBR
level is 8,333 animals out of an
estimated population of 237,000); the
number proposed to be removed in
subsequent years is anticipated to be
lower and would likely approach zero
within several years. Individual sea
lions would be lethally removed by
humane methods following
recommendations of a Safety and
Animal Care committees convened by
the states.
The proposed action to address
pinniped predation is part of a
comprehensive fish recovery strategy.
As reported in the application,
significant actions to address the
decline of salmon populations in the
Columbia River basin have been
underway for several decades and are
progressing each year as a result of
development and implementation of
ESA conservation and recovery plans
throughout the basin. These actions
include harvest reductions,
hydroelectric system mitigation,
watershed and sub-basin planning, and
hatchery reform.
The applicants state that continued
use of only non-lethal methods will
likely result in an expansion of the
problem by allowing increasing
numbers of sea lions to become
recruited into the pool of nuisance
animals. The expected benefit of
permanent removal of the animals in
question will be to reduce a recent
significant source of mortality that has
affected the states’ ongoing efforts to
recover ESA listed salmonids in the
Columbia River Basin.
In considering whether the
application should be approved or
denied, the MMPA requires that the
Task Force and NMFS consider:
(1) Population trends, feeding habits,
the location of the pinniped interaction,
how and when the interaction occurs,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and how many individual pinnipeds are
involved;
(2) Past efforts to deter such
pinnipeds, and whether the applicant
has demonstrated that no feasible and
prudent alternatives exist and that the
applicant has taken all reasonable
nonlethal steps without success;
(3) The extent to which such
pinnipeds are causing undue injury
impact to, or imbalance with, other
species in the ecosystem, including fish
populations; and
(4) The extent to which such
pinnipeds are exhibiting behavior that
presents an ongoing threat to public
safety.
The Assistant Administrator has
considered the states’ application and
determined that it provides sufficient
evidence to warrant establishing a Task
Force. The application describes the
means of identifying individual
pinnipeds, includes a detailed
description of the problem interactions
between pinnipeds and listed salmonids
at and below Bonneville Dam, and
describes the expected benefits of
potential taking of pinnipeds. The
application also documents past nonlethal efforts to prevent the problem
interactions.
Request for Comments and Other
Information
NMFS solicits public comments on
the states’ application and any
additional information that should be
considered by the Task Force in making
its recommendation, or NMFS in
making its determination whether to
approve or deny the application. NMFS
is interested in receiving additional
information related to the factors that
must be considered in determining
whether to approve or deny the
application (see Background) and on the
impact of sea lion predation at
Bonneville Dam on the affected
salmonid populations.
NMFS requests that comments be
specific. In particular, we request
information regarding:
(1) Observations of sea lions (number,
species and predation on salmonids) in
the Columbia River above or below
Bonneville Dam;
(2) Information on areas where
numbers of sea lions are concentrated in
the lower Columbia River, between
Tongue Point (river mile 16) and
Navigation Marker 85 (river mile 135),
including resting (haulout) sites and
locations where sea lions have been
repeatedly observed taking salmonids;
and
(3) Dates when sea lions have been
observed in the river above Tongue
Point to Bonneville Dam.
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
NMFS also solicits the names and
affiliations of experts from the academic
and scientific community, tribes,
Federal and state agencies, and the
private sector for consideration as
potential Task Force members. A Task
Force, established under MMPA section
120 must, to the maximum extent
practicable, consist of an equitable
balance among representatives of
resource users and non-users as
outlined above. The cover letter to the
states’ application included a list of
suggested agencies and organizations for
inclusion in the Task Force (see
Electronic Access). Nominations for
Task Force membership must include
sufficient background information (e.g.,
1–page resume) on the candidate to
allow us to judge their expertise and
should indicate the prospective
candidate’s willingness to serve without
compensation.
Dated: January 23, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–1447 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
[I.D. 012407A]
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Council; Public Meetings
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meetings.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (Council), its
Bycatch/Limited Access Privilege
Program (LAPP) Committee, its
Ecosystem Committee, its Tilefish
Committee, its Executive Committee,
and its Law Enforcement Committee
will hold public meetings.
DATES: The meetings will be held on
Tuesday, February 13, 2007 through
Thursday, February 15, 2007. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific
dates and times.
ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at
the Holiday Inn Select, 630 Naamans
Rd., Claymont, DE; telephone: (302)
791–2700.
Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, 300 S. New
Street, Dover, DE 19904.
15:36 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director,
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Council; telephone: (302) 674–2331, ext.
19.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
10 a.m. to 12 noon - The Bycatch/
LAPP Committee will meet.
1 p.m. to 4 p.m. - The Ecosystem
Committee will meet.
4 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. - The Tilefish
Committee with meet.
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
8 a.m. to 10 a.m. - The Executive
Committee will meet.
10 a.m. - The Council will convene,
at which time Regular Council business
will be conducted. The Council will
receive a report on the outcome on the
44th Stock Assessment Review.
2 p.m. to 4 p.m. - The Council will
review Framework 7 to the Summer
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
Fishery Management Plan (FMP)
[Meeting1].
4 p.m. to 5 p.m. - The Council will
meet to review and approve
Amendment 14 to Summer Flounder,
Scup, and Black Sea Bass FMP [Scup
Rebuilding Plan].
Thursday, February 15, 2007
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
VerDate Aug<31>2005
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
8 a.m. to 9 a.m. - The Law
Enforcement Committee will meet.
9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. - The Council
will convene and receive a presentation
on Northeast Monitoring Program
(NEAMAP).
10:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. - The Council
will received an update from the South
Atlantic Council regarding its SnapperGrouper FMP.
11 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. - The Council
will review and adopt Amendment 9 to
Squid, Mackerel, Butterfish FMP.
11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. - The Council
will discuss Amendment 10 to the
Squid, Mackerel, Butterfish FMP.
1:30 p.m. until adjournment - The
Council will receive committee reports
and address any continuing or new
business.
Agenda items for the Council’s
committees and the Council itself are:
The Bycatch/LAPP Committee will
review and evaluate public comments
on proposed Standardized Bycatch
Reporting Methodology (SBRM)
Amendment, discuss and develop a
Council position regarding Secretarial
submission of the SBRM Amendment,
and review the reauthorized MagnusonStevens Act (MSA) LAPP charge.
The Ecosystems Committee will
discuss: NMFS perspective on liquified
natural gas (LNG) facilities and
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4241
windmill farms, industry (Blue Water
Wind) perspective on offshore energy
sources, Ecosystem Approach to Fishery
Management, reauthorized MSA study
requirement for regional ecosystem
based management and research,
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) artificial
reef management, Corps of Engineers
(COE) permit conditions, and special
management zones.
The Tilefish Committee will review
Fishery Management Action Team
(FMAT) progress regarding Amendment
1 and provide guidance regarding future
actions.
The Executive Committee will review
new requirements regarding the
reauthorized MSA and associated
timelines. As a minimum, the
Committee will discuss the role of the
Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) in future Council actions; discuss
how best to integrate MSA and National
Environmental Protection Agency
(NEPA); address overcapitalization and
excess harvesting capacity; and, discuss
the integration of cooperative research,
experimental fishing permits and
research set-aside (RSA). The
Committee will also discuss utilization
of Joint Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission/Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council (ASMFC/MAFMC)
advisors.
When the Council convenes, it will
conduct its regular business session and
receive a report on the 44th Stock
Assessment Review to include
surfclams, ocean quahogs and skate.
Meeting 1 of Framework 7 to Summer
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
FMP will be held to review options/
alternatives regarding a mechanism to
change biological reference points
during the specification setting process
following stock assessment reviews. The
Council will then review and discuss
public hearing and written comments
concerning Amendment 14 to the
Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea
Bass FMP [Scup Rebuilding Plan],
decide and adopt final measures to be
included in Amendment 14, and
approve Amendment 14 for Secretarial
submission.
The Law Enforcement Committee will
discuss enforcement priorities for the
2007 fishing year, address maritime
security issues impacting the fishing
industry, and develop list of potential
actions for the Committee in 2007.
The Council will receive a
presentation on the NEAMAP and
receive an update from the South
Atlantic Council regarding its SnapperGrouper FMP. The Council will review
and approve Amendment 9 to Squid,
Mackerel, and Butterfish FMP for
Secretarial submission. The Council
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4239-4241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1447]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 121406B]
Marine Mammals; Pinniped Removal Authority
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS received an application under Section 120 of the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) from the states of Oregon, Washington, and
Idaho requesting authorization to intentionally take, by lethal
methods, individually identifiable California sea lions (Zalophus
californianus) that prey on Pacific salmon and steelhead (Onchorhynchus
spp.) listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species
Act (ESA) in the Columbia River in Washington and Oregon. This
authorization is requested as part of a larger effort to protect and
recover listed salmonid stocks in the river. NMFS has determined that
the application contains sufficient information to warrant convening a
Pinniped-Fishery Interaction Task Force (Task Force), which will be
established after the close of the public comment period. NMFS solicits
public comments on the application, other information related to
pinniped predation on salmonids at Bonneville Dam, and nominations for
potential members of the Task Force.
DATES: Comments and information must be received by April 2, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the application should be addressed to Assistant
Regional Administrator, Protected Resources Division, NMFS, 1201 NE
Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232. Comment may also be
submitted by email to SeaLion.Predation@noaa.gov or by fax to 301-427-
2527.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Garth Griffin, (503) 231-2005, or Tom
Eagle, (301) 713-2322, ext. 105.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
The states' application and background information on pinniped
predation on listed salmonids, and non-lethal efforts to address the
predation, are available via the Internet at the following address:
https://www.nwr.noaa.gov.
Statutory Authority
Section 120 of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361, et seq.) allows the
Secretary of Commerce, acting through the Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries (Assistant Administrator), NMFS, to authorize the intentional
lethal taking of individually identifiable pinnipeds that are having a
significant negative impact on the decline or recovery of salmonids
that are listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). The authorization applies only to pinnipeds that are
not listed under the ESA, or designated as a depleted or strategic
stock under the MMPA. Pursuant to section 120(b) and (c), applicants
may request authorization to lethally remove pinnipeds, and the
Assistant Administrator is required to:
(1) Review the application to determine whether the applicant has
produced sufficient evidence to warrant establishing a Pinniped-Fishery
Interaction Task Force (Task Force);
(2) Establish the Task Force and publish a notice in the Federal
Register requesting public comment on the application if sufficient
evidence has been produced;
(3) Consider any recommendations made by the Task Force in making a
determination whether to approve or deny the application; and
(4) If approved, immediately takes steps to implement the
intentional lethal taking, which shall be performed by Federal or state
agencies, or qualified individuals under contract to such agencies.
The Task Force is required to be comprised of the following: (1)
NMFS/NOAA staff, (2) scientists who are knowledgeable about the
pinniped interaction, (3) representatives of affected conservation and
fishing community organizations, (4) treaty Indian tribes, (5) the
states, and (6) such other organizations as NMFS deems appropriate. The
Task Force reviews the application, other background information, and
public comments and, as required by statute, recommends to NMFS whether
to approve or deny the application. The Task Force is also required to
submit with its recommendation, a description of the specific pinniped
individual or individuals, the proposed location, time, and method of
such taking, criteria for evaluating the success of the action, the
duration of the intentional lethal taking authority, and a suggestion
for non-lethal alternatives, if available and practicable, including a
recommended course of action.
Background
On December 5, 2006, NMFS received an application co-signed by the
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW), the Oregon
Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and the Idaho Department of Fish
and Game (IDFG) requesting authorization to intentionally take, by
lethal methods, individually identifiable California sea lions in the
Columbia River, which are having a significant negative impact on the
recovery of threatened and endangered Pacific salmon and steelhead.
According to the states' application, impacted salmon and steelhead
include Lower Columbia River Chinook (threatened), Lower Columbia River
steelhead (threatened), Middle Columbia River steelhead
[[Page 4240]]
(threatened), Upper Columbia River Spring Chinook (endangered), Snake
River Spring/Summer Chinook (threatened), Snake River Basin steelhead
(threatened), Upper Willamette Chinook (threatened), and Upper
Willamette steelhead (threatened). The states requested that NMFS
establish a Pinniped-Fishery Interaction Task Force and initiate the
process provided by Section 120 of the MMPA.
The states' application references studies conducted by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Fisheries Field Unit that document when
pinniped predation occurs in the Bonneville Dam tailrace, numbers of
pinnipeds present, numbers of individual sea lions observed, numbers of
salmonids consumed, and the proportion of all salmonids passing
Bonneville that are taken by pinnipeds foraging in the tailrace of the
dam. Information from the study, begun in 2002 and continuing through
2006, indicates that predation increased from an estimated 1,010
salmonids (0.35 percent of the salmonids passing the dam) in 2002 to an
estimated 2,920 salmonids (3.44 percent of the salmonids passing the
dam) in 2005. In 2006, an estimated 3,023 salmonids (2.80 percent of
the total return) were consumed by sea lions immediately below the dam.
Pinniped predation estimates at the dam represent a minimum lower bound
on the total river-wide predation because they apply only to the area
immediately below the dam (less than 0.5 miles from the structure).
California sea lions, however, have been documented by WDFW/ODFW
(unpublished data) feeding on salmonids immediately below Bonneville to
navigation Marker 85 (approximately 6 miles downstream) and throughout
the lower Columbia River.
During the spring salmon return in 2005 and 2006, the Corps, NMFS,
ODFW, and WDFW tried to deter sea lions from foraging on salmon and
steelhead in the dam's fish passage facilities and tailrace area.
Although the Corps prevented sea lions from entering the dam's fish
passage system, the agencies' collective non-lethal deterrence efforts
have done little to reduce predation of salmon and steelhead in the
tailrace area. While a more intensive non-lethal hazing program is
planned by Oregon and Washington in 2007, the states noted they must
also pursue the MMPA option for lethal removal.
The states propose to lethally remove a limited number of
California sea lions above Columbia River Navigation Marker 85
(approximately river mile 139.5), annually from January 1 to June 30.
Any lethal removal activity would be preceded by a period of non-lethal
deterrent activity (e.g., acoustic and tactile harassment) and followed
by an evaluation period. Under the proposal, this incremental process
(i.e., non-lethal deterrence followed by lethal removal and an
evaluation period) would be repeated as necessary. In addition to
animals located above Marker 85, all individually marked California sea
lions that have been documented feeding on salmonids at Bonneville Dam
would be candidates for removal without restriction to time or location
in the river. Lethal removals in the first year of the proposed
authorization is proposed to be less than one percent of the Potential
Biological Removal (PBR) level for California sea lions (current PBR
level is 8,333 animals out of an estimated population of 237,000); the
number proposed to be removed in subsequent years is anticipated to be
lower and would likely approach zero within several years. Individual
sea lions would be lethally removed by humane methods following
recommendations of a Safety and Animal Care committees convened by the
states.
The proposed action to address pinniped predation is part of a
comprehensive fish recovery strategy. As reported in the application,
significant actions to address the decline of salmon populations in the
Columbia River basin have been underway for several decades and are
progressing each year as a result of development and implementation of
ESA conservation and recovery plans throughout the basin. These actions
include harvest reductions, hydroelectric system mitigation, watershed
and sub-basin planning, and hatchery reform.
The applicants state that continued use of only non-lethal methods
will likely result in an expansion of the problem by allowing
increasing numbers of sea lions to become recruited into the pool of
nuisance animals. The expected benefit of permanent removal of the
animals in question will be to reduce a recent significant source of
mortality that has affected the states' ongoing efforts to recover ESA
listed salmonids in the Columbia River Basin.
In considering whether the application should be approved or
denied, the MMPA requires that the Task Force and NMFS consider:
(1) Population trends, feeding habits, the location of the pinniped
interaction, how and when the interaction occurs, and how many
individual pinnipeds are involved;
(2) Past efforts to deter such pinnipeds, and whether the applicant
has demonstrated that no feasible and prudent alternatives exist and
that the applicant has taken all reasonable nonlethal steps without
success;
(3) The extent to which such pinnipeds are causing undue injury
impact to, or imbalance with, other species in the ecosystem, including
fish populations; and
(4) The extent to which such pinnipeds are exhibiting behavior that
presents an ongoing threat to public safety.
The Assistant Administrator has considered the states' application
and determined that it provides sufficient evidence to warrant
establishing a Task Force. The application describes the means of
identifying individual pinnipeds, includes a detailed description of
the problem interactions between pinnipeds and listed salmonids at and
below Bonneville Dam, and describes the expected benefits of potential
taking of pinnipeds. The application also documents past non-lethal
efforts to prevent the problem interactions.
Request for Comments and Other Information
NMFS solicits public comments on the states' application and any
additional information that should be considered by the Task Force in
making its recommendation, or NMFS in making its determination whether
to approve or deny the application. NMFS is interested in receiving
additional information related to the factors that must be considered
in determining whether to approve or deny the application (see
Background) and on the impact of sea lion predation at Bonneville Dam
on the affected salmonid populations.
NMFS requests that comments be specific. In particular, we request
information regarding:
(1) Observations of sea lions (number, species and predation on
salmonids) in the Columbia River above or below Bonneville Dam;
(2) Information on areas where numbers of sea lions are
concentrated in the lower Columbia River, between Tongue Point (river
mile 16) and Navigation Marker 85 (river mile 135), including resting
(haulout) sites and locations where sea lions have been repeatedly
observed taking salmonids; and
(3) Dates when sea lions have been observed in the river above
Tongue Point to Bonneville Dam.
[[Page 4241]]
NMFS also solicits the names and affiliations of experts from the
academic and scientific community, tribes, Federal and state agencies,
and the private sector for consideration as potential Task Force
members. A Task Force, established under MMPA section 120 must, to the
maximum extent practicable, consist of an equitable balance among
representatives of resource users and non-users as outlined above. The
cover letter to the states' application included a list of suggested
agencies and organizations for inclusion in the Task Force (see
Electronic Access). Nominations for Task Force membership must include
sufficient background information (e.g., 1-page resume) on the
candidate to allow us to judge their expertise and should indicate the
prospective candidate's willingness to serve without compensation.
Dated: January 23, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-1447 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S