Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic Fisheries; Observer Health and Safety, 4226-4230 [E7-1444]
Download as PDF
4226
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Dated: January 24, 2007.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR parts 224 and 660 are
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 224—ENDANGERED MARINE
AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 224
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531–1543 and 16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
2. In § 224.104, paragraph (c) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 224.104 Special requirements for fishing
activities to protect endangered sea turtles.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Special prohibitions relating to sea
turtles are provided at § 223.206(d).
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF THE WEST
COAST STATES
3. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
4. In § 660.713, paragraph (c)(2) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 660.713
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
(c)(2) Pacific loggerhead conservation
area. No person may fish with, set, or
haul back drift gillnet gear in U.S.
waters of the Pacific Ocean east of the
120° W. meridian from June 1 through
August 31 during a forecasted, or
occurring, El Nino event off the coast of
southern California.
(i) Notification of an El Nino event.
The Assistant Administrator will
publish in the Federal Register a
notification that an El Nino event is
occurring, or is forecast to occur, off the
coast of southern California and the
requirement of a closure under this
paragraph (c)(2). Furthermore, the
Assistant Administrator will announce
the requirement of such a closure by
other methods as are necessary and
appropriate to provide actual notice to
the participants in the California/
Oregon drift gillnet fishery.
(ii) Determination of El Nino
conditions. The Assistant Administrator
will rely on information developed by
NOAA offices which monitor El Nino
events, such as NOAA’s Climate
Prediction Center and the West Coast
Office of NOAA’s Coast Watch program,
in order to determine whether an El
Nino is forecasted or occurring for the
coast of southern California. The
Assistant Administrator will use the
monthly sea surface temperature
anomaly charts to determine whether
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
[FR Doc. E7–1450 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Drift gillnet fishery.
*
there are warmer than normal sea
surface temperatures present off of
southern California during the months
prior to the closure month for years in
which an El Nino event has been
declared by the NOAA Climate
Prediction Center. Specifically, the
Assistant Administrator, will use sea
surface temperature data from the third
and second months prior to the month
of the closure for determining whether
El Nino conditions are present off of
southern California.
(iii) Reopening. If, during a closure as
described within this paragraph (c)(2),
sea surface temperatures return to
normal or below normal, the Assistant
Administrator may publish a Federal
Register notice announcing that El Nino
conditions are no longer present off the
coast of southern California and may
terminate the closure prior to August 31.
*
*
*
*
*
50 CFR Part 600
RIN 0648–AU46
[Docket No. 070118011–7011–01; I.D.
062906A]
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Observer Health and Safety
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
enhance the safety of observers and the
efficiency of their deployment. The
proposed rule would clarify prohibited
actions regarding observers, reinforce
that an observer may not be deployed or
stay aboard an unsafe vessel, clarify
when a fishing vessel is inadequate for
observer deployment and how an owner
or operator can resolve discrepancies,
improve communications between
observer programs and fishing vessel
owners and operators, and provide for
an alternate safety equipment
examination of certain small fishing
vessels. This proposed rule is necessary
to maintain and improve the safety and
effectiveness of fishing vessel observers
in carrying out their duties as
authorized by the Magnuson-Stevens
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) and the
fishery management plans and
regulations adopted under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by
5 p.m., EST, on March 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this proposed rule or its Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA),
identified by 0648–AU46, by any of the
following methods:
• E mail: 0648–AU46@noaa.gov.
Include in the subject line of the e mail
comment the following document
identifier: ‘‘Observer Safety Measures.’’
Comments sent via e mail, including all
attachments, must not exceed a 10
megabyte file size.
• Federal e Rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Lisa Desfosse, Team Leader,
National Observer Program, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Rm 12525, Silver
Spring, MD 20910
• Fax: 301–713–4137.
Copies of the Regulatory Impact
Review prepared for this action may be
obtained from Lisa Desfosse. Requests
should indicate whether paper copies or
electronic copies on CD-ROM are
preferred. These documents are also
available at the following website:
https://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st4/nop/
index.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
Desfosse at 301–713–2328.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Act, as
amended; (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), the
Marine Mammal Protection Act, as
amended (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.), the Endangered Species Act, as
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act,
as amended (ATCA; 16 U.S.C. 971 et
seq.) authorize the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary) to station
observers aboard commercial fishing
vessels to collect scientific data required
for fishery and protected species
conservation and management, to
monitor incidental mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals and other
species listed under the ESA, and to
monitor compliance with existing
Federal regulations. In addition, under
the South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988
(SPTA, 16 U.S.C. 973 et seq.), NMFS
may require observers in the South
Pacific Tuna Fishery.
Regulations governing health and
safety of observers are codified at 50
CFR 600.725 and 600.746. These
E:\FR\FM\30JAP1.SGM
30JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
regulations apply to any vessel
designated to carry an observer as part
of a mandatory or a voluntary observer
program under the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, MMPA, ESA, ATCA, SPTA, or any
other U.S. law. The proposed rule is
necessary to maintain and improve the
safety and effectiveness of observers in
carrying out their duties as authorized
by the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and the
fishery management plans and
regulations adopted under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Specifically, the proposed rule would
clarify and update prohibitions, change
paragraph headings to better reflect
contents, make pre-trip vessel safety
checks mandatory, adopt a NMFS
alternate safety equipment examination
using a vessel safety checklist of U.S.
Coast Guard (USCG) safety requirements
for vessels under 26 ft (8 m) in length
under the limited circumstances in
which a USCG Commercial Fishing
Vessel (CFV) Safety Examination cannot
be conducted, and change the observer
safety requirements to apply from the
time a vessel is notified that it has been
selected to carry an observer, rather than
commencing at the moment the observer
begins boarding the vessel. The
proposed rule would improve the clarity
of the regulations for vessel owners and
operators, strengthen the ability of
NMFS to enforce observer safety
requirements, reduce the likelihood and
associated costs of delayed fishing trips
or missed observer days at sea, and
improve NMFS observer data by
reducing vessel selection bias associated
with missed observer trips and inability
to cover smaller vessels.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Observer Samples and Observer
Protection
This proposed rule would expand the
prohibitions of § 600.725, revising
paragraphs (t) and (u) to prohibit
tampering with or destroying an
observer’s samples or equipment, or
interfering with a NMFS approved
observer. This change is necessary
because observers have reported that
fishing vessel crews have interfered
with their sampling programs by
throwing samples or equipment
overboard or otherwise destroying or
tampering with samples or equipment.
The current regulations do not expressly
prohibit tampering with samples or
equipment. The changes would also
reflect that NMFS observers are now
sometimes assigned to shoreside plants
by removing the words ‘‘aboard a
vessel.’’ The proposed rule modifies
paragraph (p) to reflect the addition of
the NMFS alternative safety
examination option and to clarify that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
passing safety examination conditions
must be maintained.
The proposed rule also adds
paragraph (w), which makes it unlawful
for a person to: ‘‘fail to maintain safe
conditions for the protection of
observers including compliance with all
USCG and other applicable rules,
regulations, or statutes applicable to the
vessel and which pertain to safe
operation of the vessel.’’ This language
reinforces that vessel owners or
operators are responsible for assuring
that USCG regulations are followed at
all times an observer is aboard their
vessel.
Observer Safety
The proposed rule changes the
heading of § 600.746(b) from ‘‘Observer
Requirement’’ to ‘‘Observer Safety’’ to
better reflect the subject matter of the
section. Currently, § 600.746(b) states
that an observer is not required to board,
or stay aboard, a vessel that is
inadequate or unsafe as described in
paragraph (c) of the section. The
definition was intended to provide the
observer with discretion not to board a
vessel. This language is open to
misinterpretation in that it would seem
not to allow an observer to board a
vessel to determine if the vessel is
unsafe. This action proposes to replace
the term ‘‘is not required’’ and replace
it with ‘‘will not be deployed,’’
clarifying the original intent of the
regulation that observers not depart in
or stay aboard vessels inadequate for
observer deployment. Further, the term
‘‘inadequate or unsafe’’ in these rules
would be changed to ‘‘inadequate for
observer deployment.’’ This change
would clarify that, while NMFS cannot
determine the absolute safety of a
vessel, NMFS can require standards of
accommodation and safety on a vessel
prior to an observer deploying in that
vessel.
Proof of Examination
Under the current regulations at
§ 600.746(c), a vessel is inadequate or
unsafe for carrying an observer unless
the vessel’s owner or operator can: (1)
show proof to NMFS of either a current
USCG CFV Safety Examination decal or
a USCG certificate of examination; and
(2) notify NMFS of that compliance
when requested. This proposed rule
would amend the current regulations to
allow the owner or operator to show
proof of passing the USCG CFV Safety
Examination when the decal may have
been lost due to window replacement,
other repair, or accident. The proposed
rule also adds language to paragraph
(d)(1), clarifying that the decal must
have been issued in the past two years,
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4227
or at an interval consistent with current
USCG regulations. This change is
necessary to give the proposed rule
flexibility in the event that USCG
changes its safety decal inspection
interval to a longer or shorter period.
Accommodations and Safety
Requirements
This proposed rule would update the
accommodations requirement in the
regulations. Each NMFS region will
provide this information to vessel
owners or operators in a manner
appropriate to that region or fishery, as
established by the appropriate Regional
Administrator. The proposed rule
would also clarify that both the
accommodations requirement and either
the USCG CFV Safety Examination
requirement or alternate examination
procedure set out in paragraph (g) of
this section must be satisfied for the
vessel to be considered adequate under
the requirements of paragraph (c).
Vessel Pre-trip Safety Check
Recent fishing vessel casualties have
highlighted the importance of safety
equipment in preventing or reducing the
severity of accidents on board fishing
vessels. The current regulations at
§ 600.746(c)(3) encourage, but do not
require, observers to use the pre-trip
safety check, including the check for
USCG required safety equipment. A
vessel may have met the requirements
for issuance of a current USCG CFV
Safety Examination decal, or passed an
appropriate USCG inspection. However,
the equipment required for issuance of
the decal or passing of the inspection
may not be present or within its
inspection parameters prior to the initial
deployment of the observer (for
example, the vessel may only have
enough personal flotation devices for
the crew, not including the observer).
This proposed rule would require that
the vessel’s captain or the captain’s
designee accompany the observer in
making a safety check to verify
compliance with safety requirements
prior to the initial observer deployment.
The checklist used by the observer will
include the six items listed in the
current regulation, plus additional
fishery-area and vessel specific items
required by the USCG. The vessel’s
captain or designee would also
accompany the observer in a walk
through the vessel to ensure that no
obviously hazardous conditions exist
aboard the vessel. This pre-trip check
may be incorporated into the vessel
safety orientation provided by the vessel
to the observer as required by 46 CFR
28.270.
E:\FR\FM\30JAP1.SGM
30JAP1
4228
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
The proposed rule would also clarify
that an emergency position indicating
radio beacon (EPIRB), when required,
must be registered to the vessel where
it is located, and that survival craft,
when required, must have sufficient
capacity to accommodate the total
number of persons, including the
observer(s), that will embark on the
voyage.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
NMFS Alternate Safety Equipment
Examination
The current regulations do not allow
for an alternative to the USCG CFV
Safety Examination in cases where
NMFS observers are required to board
smaller vessels in remote areas
(primarily in Alaska). Although these
small vessels generally comply with the
USCG CFV Safety Examination
standards, their small size precludes
them from traveling to a location where
a CFV safety examination can be
performed, and USCG personnel, in
certain circumstances, may not be
available to travel to all remote locations
to conduct an examination. This
proposed rule would provide an
alternative method for vessels less than
26 ft (8 m) in length to meet the safety
requirement by passing an alternate
safety equipment examination that is
consistent with the USCG safety
standards for commercial fishing vessels
under 26 ft. USCG safety requirements
for commercial fishing vessels are at 46
CFR part 28. A NMFS approved
observer, NMFS employee, or an
authorized observer provider would
conduct the alternate safety
examination. This alternate safety
examination would only be valid for the
trip for which the vessel was selected to
carry an observer. This alternate safety
examination would allow observer
programs to increase coverage of remote
fisheries, which would provide more
comprehensive scientific information.
Vessels would still be required to
comply with applicable regional
requirements governing observer
accommodations, which may address
adequacy, health, and safety concerns
beyond the scope of USCG standards.
Duration
The current regulations at § 600.746(e)
state that the requirements of this
section apply to the time of the
observer’s boarding, at all times the
observer is aboard, and at the time the
observer is disembarking from the
vessel. This proposed rule would amend
the current regulations by adding the
phrase ‘‘at the time of written or verbal
selection of the vessel to carry an
observer’’ by the observer program. This
would make it clear that vessels are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
required to comply with the observer
safety requirements from the time the
vessel is selected to carry an observer,
which is days or weeks in advance of
the actual deployment date of an
observer to the selected vessel, until the
observer disembarks the vessel at the
end of the observed trip. This
amendment should accelerate the
process of placing observers aboard
vessels, reduce vessel selection bias
associated with missed observer trips,
and reduce the costs of fishing trip
delay by providing an additional
assurance that the selected vessel
complies with the regulations on the
day the observed fishing trip is
scheduled. It will also give NMFS
authority to enforce the safety
requirements prior to the deployment of
an observer by, for example, checking
vessels for compliance with safety
requirements.
Classification
NMFS has preliminarily determined
that the rule is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act and
other applicable laws.
The proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA)
Section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that
NMFS prepare an IRFA describing the
economic impact this proposed rule, if
adopted, would have on small entities.
These economic impacts are discussed
below. A description of the action, why
it is being considered, the objectives of,
and the legal basis for this action are
found in the Background and
SUMMARY sections of the preamble.
This rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any relevant federal rules.
There are no reporting, recordkeeping,
or other compliance costs associated
with this rulemaking.
Description and Number of Entities
Affected
NMFS has defined all fish-harvesting
or hatchery businesses that are
independently owned and operated, not
dominant in their field of operation,
with annual receipts not in excess of
$4,000,000, as small businesses. NMFS
estimates that approximately 8,925
commercial fishing vessels could be
required to carry an observer in NMFSregulated fisheries. Current, precise data
on the number of commercial fishing
vessels that are ‘‘small entities’’ is not
presently available because year-to-year
participation by such entities in any
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
given fishery is variable, due to
economic, regulatory, climatic, and
other forces. However, an estimate of
8,755–8,825 vessels was derived by
combining the best estimates from data
available to each of the regional
programs.
The proposed rule clarifies an existing
NMFS requirement that vessels display
a USCG CFV Safety Examination decal.
The decal is obtained after passing a
USCG inspection of the vessel for
compliance with USCG safety
regulations. The inspection is scheduled
at a time convenient to the vessel owner
or operator, and is free of charge (except
to some processor vessels). NMFS has
not identified any disproportionate
economic impacts between small and
large entities for this action.
Furthermore, there are no
disproportionate economic impacts
among groups of entities based on types
of gear, areas fished, or vessel size.
Preferred Alternative
The benefits of the preferred
alternative include increased safety for
all crew members and observers.
Potential costs to vessel owners or
operators include the costs associated
with putting the vessel in safe
condition. However, this is already
required by the existing NMFS
regulations and is based on safety
regulations promulgated and enforced
by the USCG. Therefore, this rule
should not impose new compliance
costs.
This proposed rule does not require
that vessel operators expend more than
the existing rules require (e.g. for the
purchase of an additional personal
floatation device). However, failure of a
vessel to comply with this proposed
rule may cause loss of fishing time. The
cost of a lost fishing day will vary
among fisheries. For example, a fishing
day at sea in a multispecies fishery in
the Northeast region has been valued at
an average of $364, but this figure
would vary in other fisheries,
depending upon the value of the fishery,
the type of management regime
governing that fishery, and the degree to
which a vessel derives its income from
that fishery. The risk of loss of fishing
time due to this proposed rule is
minimal, because vessel owners are
already required to comply with USCG
safety regulations and to obtain a USCG
CFV Safety Decal. NMFS anticipates
that vessel owners will voluntarily
ensure that their vessels comply with
the safety requirements to avoid the loss
of fishing time.
Vessels would incur a small cost in
allocating the captain or other crew
member’s time to accompany the
E:\FR\FM\30JAP1.SGM
30JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
observer on the pre-trip safety check,
but this could be readily integrated into
existing procedures, such as the existing
requirement to orient the observer to the
vessel (46 CFR 28.270). Additional
benefits of this proposed rule include
the avoidance of the loss of human life
and the economic costs of non-lethal
injury.
‘‘No Action’’ and Other Alternatives
Under the ‘‘no action’’ alternative to
this proposed rule, no new costs would
be incurred. However, the difference
between the cost of ‘‘no action’’ and the
cost of the preferred alternative is
minimal and NMFS believes that most
of the affected vessels already
voluntarily follow the USCG safety
regulations and comply with the
existing NMFS requirement for a USCG
CFV Safety Decal.
Another alternative discussed by
NMFS is to allow the observer to assess,
in addition to the safety requirements
set out in the proposed rule, a range of
considerations, such as food and
accommodation quality, competence of
the vessel captain and crew, and drug or
alcohol use by the captain or crew. This
option would broaden the safety
protections of observers, but would also
enable the observer to make subjective,
individual determinations that not all
vessels would be able to economically
meet for all observers. The risk of loss
of fishing days under this alternative is
greater than the preferred alternative.
Finally, NMFS considered making a
NMFS employee or an authorized
observer provider the judge of the
adequacy of a vessel. NMFS does not
believe that a NMFS employee or an
observer provider is more likely to
discover safety issues than the observer,
so this alternative does not improve
safety. This alternative also has the
potential to increase the risk of lost
fishing days while safety concerns are
resolved, particularly if there is
disagreement between the observer and
NMFS or the observer provider about
whether the vessel is adequate.
A copy of the IRFA is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 600
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 24, 2007.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 600 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:08 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PART 600—MAGNUSON–STEVENS
ACT PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 600
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.
2. In § 600.725, paragraphs (p), (t), and
(u) are revised and paragraph (w) added
to read as follows:
§ 600.725
General prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(p) Fail to show proof of passing the
USCG Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety
Examination or the NMFS alternate
safety equipment examination, or fail to
maintain the vessel safety conditions
necessary to pass the examination,
when required by NMFS pursuant to
§ 600.746.
*
*
*
*
*
(t) Assault, oppose, impede,
intimidate, or interfere with a NMFSapproved observer.
(u)(1) Prohibit or bar by command,
impediment, threat, coercion,
interference, or refusal of reasonable
assistance, an observer from conducting
his or her duties as an observer; or
(2) Tamper with or destroy samples or
equipment.
*
*
*
*
*
(w) Fail to maintain safe conditions
for the protection of observers including
compliance with all USCG and other
applicable rules, regulations, or statutes
applicable to the vessel and which
pertain to safe operation of the vessel.
3. In § 600.746, paragraphs (b) through
(f) are revised and paragraphs (g) and (h)
are added to read as follows:
§ 600.746
Observers.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Observer safety. An observer will
not be deployed on, or stay aboard, a
vessel that is inadequate for observer
deployment as described in paragraph
(c) of this section.
(c) Vessel inadequate for observer
deployment. A vessel is inadequate for
observer deployment and allowing
operation of normal observer functions
if it:
(1) Does not comply with the
applicable regulations regarding
observer accommodations (see 50 CFR
parts 229, 285, 300, 600, 622, 635, 648,
660, and 679);
(2) Has not passed a USCG
Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety
Examination, or
(3) For vessels less than 26 ft (8 m) in
length, has not passed an alternate
safety equipment examination, as
described in paragraph (g) of this
section.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4229
(d) Display or show proof. A vessel
that has passed a USCG Commercial
Fishing Vessel Safety Examination must
display or show proof of one of the
following:
(1) A valid USCG Commercial Fishing
Vessel Safety Examination decal
certifying compliance with regulations
found in 33 CFR chapter I and 46 CFR
chapter I, that will not expire before the
end of the fishing trip, and issued
within the last 2 years, or at a time
interval consistent with current USCG
regulations;
(2) In situations of mitigating
circumstances which may prevent a
vessel from displaying a valid safety
decal (broken window, etc.), NMFS, the
observer, or NMFS’ designated observer
provider may accept the associated
documentation as proof of the missing
safety decal in paragraph (d)(1) of this
section;
(3) A certificate of compliance issued
pursuant to 46 CFR 28.710;
(4) A certificate of inspection
pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 3311.
(e) Visual inspection. Upon request by
an observer, a NMFS employee, or a
designated observer provider, a vessel
owner or operator must provide correct
information concerning any item
relating to any safety or accommodation
requirement prescribed by law or
regulation, in a manner and according to
a timeframe as directed by NMFS. A
vessel owner or operator must also
allow an observer, a NMFS employee, or
a designated observer provider to
visually examine any such item.
(f) Vessel safety check. Prior to the
initial deployment, the vessel owner or
operator or the owner or operator’s
designee must accompany the observer
in a walk through the vessel’s major
spaces to ensure that no obviously
hazardous conditions exist. This action
may be a part of the vessel safety
orientation to be provided by the vessel
to the observer as required by 46 CFR
28.270. The vessel owner or operator or
the owner or operator’s designee must
also accompany the observer in
checking the following major items as
required by applicable USCG
regulations:
(1) Personal flotation devices/
immersion suits;
(2) Ring buoys;
(3) Distress signals;
(4) Fire extinguishing equipment;
(5) Emergency position indicating
radio beacon (EPIRB), when required,
registered to the vessel where it is
located;
E:\FR\FM\30JAP1.SGM
30JAP1
4230
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS
(6) Survival craft, when required, with
sufficient capacity to accommodate the
total number of persons, including the
observer(s), that will embark on the
voyage; and
(7) Other fishery-area and vessel
specific items required by the USCG.
(g) Alternate safety equipment
examination. If a vessel is under 26 ft
(8 m) in length, and NMFS has
determined that the USCG cannot
provide a USCG Commercial Fishing
Vessel Safety Examination due to
unavailability of inspectors or to
unavailability of transportation to or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:44 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
from an inspection station, the vessel
will be adequate for observer
deployment if it passes an alternate
safety equipment examination
conducted by a NMFS certified
observer, observer provider, or a NMFS
observer program employee, using a
checklist of USCG safety requirements
for commercial fishing vessels under 26
ft (8 m) in length. Passage of the
alternative examination will only be
effective for the single trip selected for
observer coverage.
(h) Duration. The requirements of this
section apply at the time the vessel
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
owner or operator is notified orally or in
writing by an observer, a NMFS
employee, or a designated observer
provider, that his or her vessel has been
selected to carry an observer. The
requirements of this section continue to
apply through the time of the observer’s
boarding, at all times the observer is
aboard, and at the time the observer
disembarks from the vessel at the end of
the observed trip.
[FR Doc. E7–1444 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\30JAP1.SGM
30JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 30, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4226-4230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1444]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 600
RIN 0648-AU46
[Docket No. 070118011-7011-01; I.D. 062906A]
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic
Fisheries; Observer Health and Safety
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would enhance the safety of observers and
the efficiency of their deployment. The proposed rule would clarify
prohibited actions regarding observers, reinforce that an observer may
not be deployed or stay aboard an unsafe vessel, clarify when a fishing
vessel is inadequate for observer deployment and how an owner or
operator can resolve discrepancies, improve communications between
observer programs and fishing vessel owners and operators, and provide
for an alternate safety equipment examination of certain small fishing
vessels. This proposed rule is necessary to maintain and improve the
safety and effectiveness of fishing vessel observers in carrying out
their duties as authorized by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation
and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) and the fishery management
plans and regulations adopted under the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
DATES: Comments must be received by 5 p.m., EST, on March 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this proposed rule or its Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), identified by 0648-AU46, by any
of the following methods:
E mail: 0648-AU46@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line of
the e mail comment the following document identifier: ``Observer Safety
Measures.'' Comments sent via e mail, including all attachments, must
not exceed a 10 megabyte file size.
Federal e Rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Lisa Desfosse, Team Leader, National Observer
Program, National Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Rm
12525, Silver Spring, MD 20910
Fax: 301-713-4137.
Copies of the Regulatory Impact Review prepared for this action may
be obtained from Lisa Desfosse. Requests should indicate whether paper
copies or electronic copies on CD-ROM are preferred. These documents
are also available at the following website: https://
www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st4/nop/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Desfosse at 301-713-2328.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended; (16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), the
Marine Mammal Protection Act, as amended (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.), the Endangered Species Act, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act, as amended (ATCA; 16
U.S.C. 971 et seq.) authorize the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to
station observers aboard commercial fishing vessels to collect
scientific data required for fishery and protected species conservation
and management, to monitor incidental mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals and other species listed under the ESA, and to monitor
compliance with existing Federal regulations. In addition, under the
South Pacific Tuna Act of 1988 (SPTA, 16 U.S.C. 973 et seq.), NMFS may
require observers in the South Pacific Tuna Fishery.
Regulations governing health and safety of observers are codified
at 50 CFR 600.725 and 600.746. These
[[Page 4227]]
regulations apply to any vessel designated to carry an observer as part
of a mandatory or a voluntary observer program under the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, MMPA, ESA, ATCA, SPTA, or any other U.S. law. The proposed
rule is necessary to maintain and improve the safety and effectiveness
of observers in carrying out their duties as authorized by the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, and the fishery management plans and regulations
adopted under the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
Specifically, the proposed rule would clarify and update
prohibitions, change paragraph headings to better reflect contents,
make pre-trip vessel safety checks mandatory, adopt a NMFS alternate
safety equipment examination using a vessel safety checklist of U.S.
Coast Guard (USCG) safety requirements for vessels under 26 ft (8 m) in
length under the limited circumstances in which a USCG Commercial
Fishing Vessel (CFV) Safety Examination cannot be conducted, and change
the observer safety requirements to apply from the time a vessel is
notified that it has been selected to carry an observer, rather than
commencing at the moment the observer begins boarding the vessel. The
proposed rule would improve the clarity of the regulations for vessel
owners and operators, strengthen the ability of NMFS to enforce
observer safety requirements, reduce the likelihood and associated
costs of delayed fishing trips or missed observer days at sea, and
improve NMFS observer data by reducing vessel selection bias associated
with missed observer trips and inability to cover smaller vessels.
Observer Samples and Observer Protection
This proposed rule would expand the prohibitions of Sec. 600.725,
revising paragraphs (t) and (u) to prohibit tampering with or
destroying an observer's samples or equipment, or interfering with a
NMFS approved observer. This change is necessary because observers have
reported that fishing vessel crews have interfered with their sampling
programs by throwing samples or equipment overboard or otherwise
destroying or tampering with samples or equipment. The current
regulations do not expressly prohibit tampering with samples or
equipment. The changes would also reflect that NMFS observers are now
sometimes assigned to shoreside plants by removing the words ``aboard a
vessel.'' The proposed rule modifies paragraph (p) to reflect the
addition of the NMFS alternative safety examination option and to
clarify that passing safety examination conditions must be maintained.
The proposed rule also adds paragraph (w), which makes it unlawful
for a person to: ``fail to maintain safe conditions for the protection
of observers including compliance with all USCG and other applicable
rules, regulations, or statutes applicable to the vessel and which
pertain to safe operation of the vessel.'' This language reinforces
that vessel owners or operators are responsible for assuring that USCG
regulations are followed at all times an observer is aboard their
vessel.
Observer Safety
The proposed rule changes the heading of Sec. 600.746(b) from
``Observer Requirement'' to ``Observer Safety'' to better reflect the
subject matter of the section. Currently, Sec. 600.746(b) states that
an observer is not required to board, or stay aboard, a vessel that is
inadequate or unsafe as described in paragraph (c) of the section. The
definition was intended to provide the observer with discretion not to
board a vessel. This language is open to misinterpretation in that it
would seem not to allow an observer to board a vessel to determine if
the vessel is unsafe. This action proposes to replace the term ``is not
required'' and replace it with ``will not be deployed,'' clarifying the
original intent of the regulation that observers not depart in or stay
aboard vessels inadequate for observer deployment. Further, the term
``inadequate or unsafe'' in these rules would be changed to
``inadequate for observer deployment.'' This change would clarify that,
while NMFS cannot determine the absolute safety of a vessel, NMFS can
require standards of accommodation and safety on a vessel prior to an
observer deploying in that vessel.
Proof of Examination
Under the current regulations at Sec. 600.746(c), a vessel is
inadequate or unsafe for carrying an observer unless the vessel's owner
or operator can: (1) show proof to NMFS of either a current USCG CFV
Safety Examination decal or a USCG certificate of examination; and (2)
notify NMFS of that compliance when requested. This proposed rule would
amend the current regulations to allow the owner or operator to show
proof of passing the USCG CFV Safety Examination when the decal may
have been lost due to window replacement, other repair, or accident.
The proposed rule also adds language to paragraph (d)(1), clarifying
that the decal must have been issued in the past two years, or at an
interval consistent with current USCG regulations. This change is
necessary to give the proposed rule flexibility in the event that USCG
changes its safety decal inspection interval to a longer or shorter
period.
Accommodations and Safety Requirements
This proposed rule would update the accommodations requirement in
the regulations. Each NMFS region will provide this information to
vessel owners or operators in a manner appropriate to that region or
fishery, as established by the appropriate Regional Administrator. The
proposed rule would also clarify that both the accommodations
requirement and either the USCG CFV Safety Examination requirement or
alternate examination procedure set out in paragraph (g) of this
section must be satisfied for the vessel to be considered adequate
under the requirements of paragraph (c).
Vessel Pre-trip Safety Check
Recent fishing vessel casualties have highlighted the importance of
safety equipment in preventing or reducing the severity of accidents on
board fishing vessels. The current regulations at Sec. 600.746(c)(3)
encourage, but do not require, observers to use the pre-trip safety
check, including the check for USCG required safety equipment. A vessel
may have met the requirements for issuance of a current USCG CFV Safety
Examination decal, or passed an appropriate USCG inspection. However,
the equipment required for issuance of the decal or passing of the
inspection may not be present or within its inspection parameters prior
to the initial deployment of the observer (for example, the vessel may
only have enough personal flotation devices for the crew, not including
the observer).
This proposed rule would require that the vessel's captain or the
captain's designee accompany the observer in making a safety check to
verify compliance with safety requirements prior to the initial
observer deployment. The checklist used by the observer will include
the six items listed in the current regulation, plus additional
fishery-area and vessel specific items required by the USCG. The
vessel's captain or designee would also accompany the observer in a
walk through the vessel to ensure that no obviously hazardous
conditions exist aboard the vessel. This pre-trip check may be
incorporated into the vessel safety orientation provided by the vessel
to the observer as required by 46 CFR 28.270.
[[Page 4228]]
The proposed rule would also clarify that an emergency position
indicating radio beacon (EPIRB), when required, must be registered to
the vessel where it is located, and that survival craft, when required,
must have sufficient capacity to accommodate the total number of
persons, including the observer(s), that will embark on the voyage.
NMFS Alternate Safety Equipment Examination
The current regulations do not allow for an alternative to the USCG
CFV Safety Examination in cases where NMFS observers are required to
board smaller vessels in remote areas (primarily in Alaska). Although
these small vessels generally comply with the USCG CFV Safety
Examination standards, their small size precludes them from traveling
to a location where a CFV safety examination can be performed, and USCG
personnel, in certain circumstances, may not be available to travel to
all remote locations to conduct an examination. This proposed rule
would provide an alternative method for vessels less than 26 ft (8 m)
in length to meet the safety requirement by passing an alternate safety
equipment examination that is consistent with the USCG safety standards
for commercial fishing vessels under 26 ft. USCG safety requirements
for commercial fishing vessels are at 46 CFR part 28. A NMFS approved
observer, NMFS employee, or an authorized observer provider would
conduct the alternate safety examination. This alternate safety
examination would only be valid for the trip for which the vessel was
selected to carry an observer. This alternate safety examination would
allow observer programs to increase coverage of remote fisheries, which
would provide more comprehensive scientific information. Vessels would
still be required to comply with applicable regional requirements
governing observer accommodations, which may address adequacy, health,
and safety concerns beyond the scope of USCG standards.
Duration
The current regulations at Sec. 600.746(e) state that the
requirements of this section apply to the time of the observer's
boarding, at all times the observer is aboard, and at the time the
observer is disembarking from the vessel. This proposed rule would
amend the current regulations by adding the phrase ``at the time of
written or verbal selection of the vessel to carry an observer'' by the
observer program. This would make it clear that vessels are required to
comply with the observer safety requirements from the time the vessel
is selected to carry an observer, which is days or weeks in advance of
the actual deployment date of an observer to the selected vessel, until
the observer disembarks the vessel at the end of the observed trip.
This amendment should accelerate the process of placing observers
aboard vessels, reduce vessel selection bias associated with missed
observer trips, and reduce the costs of fishing trip delay by providing
an additional assurance that the selected vessel complies with the
regulations on the day the observed fishing trip is scheduled. It will
also give NMFS authority to enforce the safety requirements prior to
the deployment of an observer by, for example, checking vessels for
compliance with safety requirements.
Classification
NMFS has preliminarily determined that the rule is consistent with
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and other
applicable laws.
The proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
Section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that
NMFS prepare an IRFA describing the economic impact this proposed rule,
if adopted, would have on small entities. These economic impacts are
discussed below. A description of the action, why it is being
considered, the objectives of, and the legal basis for this action are
found in the Background and SUMMARY sections of the preamble. This rule
does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any relevant federal
rules. There are no reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance costs
associated with this rulemaking.
Description and Number of Entities Affected
NMFS has defined all fish-harvesting or hatchery businesses that
are independently owned and operated, not dominant in their field of
operation, with annual receipts not in excess of $4,000,000, as small
businesses. NMFS estimates that approximately 8,925 commercial fishing
vessels could be required to carry an observer in NMFS-regulated
fisheries. Current, precise data on the number of commercial fishing
vessels that are ``small entities'' is not presently available because
year-to-year participation by such entities in any given fishery is
variable, due to economic, regulatory, climatic, and other forces.
However, an estimate of 8,755-8,825 vessels was derived by combining
the best estimates from data available to each of the regional
programs.
The proposed rule clarifies an existing NMFS requirement that
vessels display a USCG CFV Safety Examination decal. The decal is
obtained after passing a USCG inspection of the vessel for compliance
with USCG safety regulations. The inspection is scheduled at a time
convenient to the vessel owner or operator, and is free of charge
(except to some processor vessels). NMFS has not identified any
disproportionate economic impacts between small and large entities for
this action. Furthermore, there are no disproportionate economic
impacts among groups of entities based on types of gear, areas fished,
or vessel size.
Preferred Alternative
The benefits of the preferred alternative include increased safety
for all crew members and observers. Potential costs to vessel owners or
operators include the costs associated with putting the vessel in safe
condition. However, this is already required by the existing NMFS
regulations and is based on safety regulations promulgated and enforced
by the USCG. Therefore, this rule should not impose new compliance
costs.
This proposed rule does not require that vessel operators expend
more than the existing rules require (e.g. for the purchase of an
additional personal floatation device). However, failure of a vessel to
comply with this proposed rule may cause loss of fishing time. The cost
of a lost fishing day will vary among fisheries. For example, a fishing
day at sea in a multispecies fishery in the Northeast region has been
valued at an average of $364, but this figure would vary in other
fisheries, depending upon the value of the fishery, the type of
management regime governing that fishery, and the degree to which a
vessel derives its income from that fishery. The risk of loss of
fishing time due to this proposed rule is minimal, because vessel
owners are already required to comply with USCG safety regulations and
to obtain a USCG CFV Safety Decal. NMFS anticipates that vessel owners
will voluntarily ensure that their vessels comply with the safety
requirements to avoid the loss of fishing time.
Vessels would incur a small cost in allocating the captain or other
crew member's time to accompany the
[[Page 4229]]
observer on the pre-trip safety check, but this could be readily
integrated into existing procedures, such as the existing requirement
to orient the observer to the vessel (46 CFR 28.270). Additional
benefits of this proposed rule include the avoidance of the loss of
human life and the economic costs of non-lethal injury.
``No Action'' and Other Alternatives
Under the ``no action'' alternative to this proposed rule, no new
costs would be incurred. However, the difference between the cost of
``no action'' and the cost of the preferred alternative is minimal and
NMFS believes that most of the affected vessels already voluntarily
follow the USCG safety regulations and comply with the existing NMFS
requirement for a USCG CFV Safety Decal.
Another alternative discussed by NMFS is to allow the observer to
assess, in addition to the safety requirements set out in the proposed
rule, a range of considerations, such as food and accommodation
quality, competence of the vessel captain and crew, and drug or alcohol
use by the captain or crew. This option would broaden the safety
protections of observers, but would also enable the observer to make
subjective, individual determinations that not all vessels would be
able to economically meet for all observers. The risk of loss of
fishing days under this alternative is greater than the preferred
alternative.
Finally, NMFS considered making a NMFS employee or an authorized
observer provider the judge of the adequacy of a vessel. NMFS does not
believe that a NMFS employee or an observer provider is more likely to
discover safety issues than the observer, so this alternative does not
improve safety. This alternative also has the potential to increase the
risk of lost fishing days while safety concerns are resolved,
particularly if there is disagreement between the observer and NMFS or
the observer provider about whether the vessel is adequate.
A copy of the IRFA is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 600
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 24, 2007.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 600 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 600--MAGNUSON-STEVENS ACT PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 600 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 561 and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 600.725, paragraphs (p), (t), and (u) are revised and
paragraph (w) added to read as follows:
Sec. 600.725 General prohibitions.
* * * * *
(p) Fail to show proof of passing the USCG Commercial Fishing
Vessel Safety Examination or the NMFS alternate safety equipment
examination, or fail to maintain the vessel safety conditions necessary
to pass the examination, when required by NMFS pursuant to Sec.
600.746.
* * * * *
(t) Assault, oppose, impede, intimidate, or interfere with a NMFS-
approved observer.
(u)(1) Prohibit or bar by command, impediment, threat, coercion,
interference, or refusal of reasonable assistance, an observer from
conducting his or her duties as an observer; or
(2) Tamper with or destroy samples or equipment.
* * * * *
(w) Fail to maintain safe conditions for the protection of
observers including compliance with all USCG and other applicable
rules, regulations, or statutes applicable to the vessel and which
pertain to safe operation of the vessel.
3. In Sec. 600.746, paragraphs (b) through (f) are revised and
paragraphs (g) and (h) are added to read as follows:
Sec. 600.746 Observers.
* * * * *
(b) Observer safety. An observer will not be deployed on, or stay
aboard, a vessel that is inadequate for observer deployment as
described in paragraph (c) of this section.
(c) Vessel inadequate for observer deployment. A vessel is
inadequate for observer deployment and allowing operation of normal
observer functions if it:
(1) Does not comply with the applicable regulations regarding
observer accommodations (see 50 CFR parts 229, 285, 300, 600, 622, 635,
648, 660, and 679);
(2) Has not passed a USCG Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety
Examination, or
(3) For vessels less than 26 ft (8 m) in length, has not passed an
alternate safety equipment examination, as described in paragraph (g)
of this section.
(d) Display or show proof. A vessel that has passed a USCG
Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Examination must display or show proof
of one of the following:
(1) A valid USCG Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Examination decal
certifying compliance with regulations found in 33 CFR chapter I and 46
CFR chapter I, that will not expire before the end of the fishing trip,
and issued within the last 2 years, or at a time interval consistent
with current USCG regulations;
(2) In situations of mitigating circumstances which may prevent a
vessel from displaying a valid safety decal (broken window, etc.),
NMFS, the observer, or NMFS' designated observer provider may accept
the associated documentation as proof of the missing safety decal in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section;
(3) A certificate of compliance issued pursuant to 46 CFR 28.710;
(4) A certificate of inspection pursuant to 46 U.S.C. 3311.
(e) Visual inspection. Upon request by an observer, a NMFS
employee, or a designated observer provider, a vessel owner or operator
must provide correct information concerning any item relating to any
safety or accommodation requirement prescribed by law or regulation, in
a manner and according to a timeframe as directed by NMFS. A vessel
owner or operator must also allow an observer, a NMFS employee, or a
designated observer provider to visually examine any such item.
(f) Vessel safety check. Prior to the initial deployment, the
vessel owner or operator or the owner or operator's designee must
accompany the observer in a walk through the vessel's major spaces to
ensure that no obviously hazardous conditions exist. This action may be
a part of the vessel safety orientation to be provided by the vessel to
the observer as required by 46 CFR 28.270. The vessel owner or operator
or the owner or operator's designee must also accompany the observer in
checking the following major items as required by applicable USCG
regulations:
(1) Personal flotation devices/immersion suits;
(2) Ring buoys;
(3) Distress signals;
(4) Fire extinguishing equipment;
(5) Emergency position indicating radio beacon (EPIRB), when
required, registered to the vessel where it is located;
[[Page 4230]]
(6) Survival craft, when required, with sufficient capacity to
accommodate the total number of persons, including the observer(s),
that will embark on the voyage; and
(7) Other fishery-area and vessel specific items required by the
USCG.
(g) Alternate safety equipment examination. If a vessel is under 26
ft (8 m) in length, and NMFS has determined that the USCG cannot
provide a USCG Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety Examination due to
unavailability of inspectors or to unavailability of transportation to
or from an inspection station, the vessel will be adequate for observer
deployment if it passes an alternate safety equipment examination
conducted by a NMFS certified observer, observer provider, or a NMFS
observer program employee, using a checklist of USCG safety
requirements for commercial fishing vessels under 26 ft (8 m) in
length. Passage of the alternative examination will only be effective
for the single trip selected for observer coverage.
(h) Duration. The requirements of this section apply at the time
the vessel owner or operator is notified orally or in writing by an
observer, a NMFS employee, or a designated observer provider, that his
or her vessel has been selected to carry an observer. The requirements
of this section continue to apply through the time of the observer's
boarding, at all times the observer is aboard, and at the time the
observer disembarks from the vessel at the end of the observed trip.
[FR Doc. E7-1444 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S