Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Submission for OMB Review, 4263-4264 [E7-1357]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
Comments may be
submitted electronically, by mail, or
through hand delivery/courier. Send
written comments to: Greg Davis (8P–
W–WW); Attention: NPDES Permits;
U.S. EPA, 1595 Wynkoop Street;
Denver, CO 80202. Public comments
will also be accepted via electronic mail
(E-mail) at davis.gregory@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
a copy of the draft permit and fact sheet
or for further information on the draft
permit, contact either Greg Davis (303)
312–6314 (davis.gregory@epa.gov) at the
above address or Ellen Bonner, (303)
312–6371 (bonner.ellen@epa.gov), at
U.S. EPA Region 8 (8P–W–WW); 1595
Wynkoop Street; Denver, CO 80202.
Copies of the draft permit and Fact
Sheet may be downloaded from the EPA
Region 8 Web site at https://
www.epa.gov/region8/water/stormwater.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective
January 17, 2007, the Office of
Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance
for EPA Region 8 will be located in a
new office at 1595 Wynkoop Street.
Commenters are encouraged to use the
Wynkoop Street address for all
comments submitted, however,
comments submitted to the EPA office
at 999 18th Street in Denver will be
forwarded to the new office location.
ADDRESSES:
Dated: January 8, 2007.
Stephen S. Tuber,
Assistant Regional Administrator, Office of
Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–1426 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Submission for OMB Review
Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Final notice of submission for
OMB review.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission (EEOC) hereby gives notice
that it has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) a
request to approve a new information
collection as described below.
DATES: Written comments on this final
notice must be submitted on or before
March 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The Request for Clearance
(SF 83–I), supporting statement, and
other documents submitted to OMB for
review may be obtained from: Brett
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Brenner, Attorney Advisor, 1801 L
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.
Comments on this final notice must be
submitted to Brenda Aguilar, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Room 10235, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503 or electronically mailed to
baguilar@omb.eop.gov. Comments
should also be sent to Stephen
Llewellyn, Executive Officer, Executive
Secretariat, Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, 10th Floor,
1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC
20507. As a convenience to
commentators, the Executive Secretariat
will accept comments totaling six or
fewer pages by facsimile (‘‘FAX’’)
machine. This limitation is necessary to
assure access to the equipment. The
telephone number of the FAX receiver
is (202) 663–4114. (This is not a toll-free
number.) Receipt of FAX transmittals
will not be acknowledged, except that
the sender may request confirmation of
receipt by calling the Executive
Secretariat staff at (202) 663–4070
(voice) or (202) 663–4074 (TTY). (These
are not toll-free telephone numbers.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia Pierre, Director, Field
Management Programs, Office of Field
Programs, at (202) 663–7115. This
notice is also available in the following
formats: large print, Braille, audio tape
and electronic file on computer disk.
Requests for this notice in an alternative
format should be made to the EEOC
Publications Center at 1–800–669–3362.
A notice
that EEOC would be submitting this
request was published in the Federal
Register on September 7, 2006, allowing
for a 60-day public comment period.
Two comments were received. The first
comment questioned whether the three
questions were enough to serve as the
‘‘sole component, or perhaps even the
primary component, of an accurate
evaluation’’ of the Contact Center’s
quality of service. The comment asked
that the questionnaire be expanded to
include more questions to provide a
‘‘significantly more precise and
thorough sense of potential claimants’
experience’’ with the Center. The
suggested additions to the questionnaire
dealt with responsiveness, e.g., the type
of information requested, if it was
communicated clearly, if it was
answered in a timely fashion and if the
Center was able to answer the caller’s
question. The second comment, besides
expressing general opposition to the
Contact Center as a whole, states that
the survey is not an adequate indicator
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4263
of performance and expresses concern
that the survey is too short.
The EEOC is not relying on the three
questions in the customer service survey
as the sole, or even the primary,
indicator of Contact Center
performance. However, capturing the
level of customer satisfaction is
important and is a factor in judging the
performance of the Center. Additionally,
the Contact Center currently collects
data and performance metrics that
answer many of the concerns expressed
in the comment, including the time it
takes to answer a call and the type of
information requested by a caller.
Further, the EEOC regularly monitors
calls on a live and recorded basis to
ensure the accuracy and quality of the
information provided by the Center.
Therefore, we believe that the customer
survey is adequate for its intended
purpose.
Overview of This Information
Collection
Collection Title: EEOC National
Contact Center Customer Satisfaction
Survey.
OMB No.: None.
Frequency of Report: On occasion.
Description of Affected Public:
Individuals or households; Businesses
or other for profit, not-for-profit
institutions; state or local governments.
Responses: 200,000.
Reporting Hours: 5,722.
Federal Cost: 0.
Abstract: Voluntary customer
satisfaction survey for the users of the
EEOC National Contact Center. The
survey is necessary to gauge customer
satisfaction and to assist in determining
contract performance and guide possible
changes in the operation of the Contact
Center.
Burden Statement: The estimated
number of respondents is approximately
200,000 people. Over the past six
months, the NCC has averaged
approximately 51,000 contacts from the
public each month. Because the survey
is voluntary there is no way to
accurately predict the number of users
who will agree to take the survey. The
contractor estimates that, based on its
experience with similar surveys the
response rate will be between 25% and
35%. The contractor also estimates that
if the respondent does not need to have
the satisfaction questions repeated and
responds immediately after hearing the
complete response, the survey will take
approximately 1 minute 43 seconds to
administer. The burden is estimated at
5,722 hours. We estimated 200,000
annual surveys completed at 1 minute
and 43 seconds per survey. There is no
annualized cost to respondents.
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
30JAN1
4264
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
Dated: January 19, 2007.
For the Commission.
Naomi C. Earp,
Chair.
[FR Doc. E7–1357 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
from the National Information Center
website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than February 26,
2007.
Trans #
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
(Richard Walker, Community Affairs
Officer) P.O. Box 55882, Boston,
Massachusetts 02106-2204:
1. New England Bancshares, Inc.,
Enfield, Connecticut, to become a bank
holding company by acquiring First
Valley Bancorp, Inc., Bristol,
Connecticut, and thereby indirectly
acquire voting shares of Valley Bank,
Bristol, Connecticut.
In connection with this application,
Applicant also has applied to retain
voting shares of Enfield Federal Savings
and Loan Association, Enfield,
Connecticut, and thereby engage in
operating a Federal savings and loan
association, pursuant to section
225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, January 25, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7–1406 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
Federal Reserve System
Sunshine Act Meeting
Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Monday,
February 5, 2007.
PLACE: Marriner S. Eccles Federal
Reserve Board Building, 20th and C
Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.
STATUS: Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. Personnel actions (appointments,
promotions, assignments,
reassignments, and salary actions)
involving individual Federal Reserve
System employees.
2. Any items carried forward from a
previously announced meeting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office
of Board Members at 202–452–2955.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: You may
call 202–452–3206 beginning at
AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:
Acquiring
approximately 5 p.m. two business days
before the meeting for a recorded
announcement of bank and bank
holding company applications
scheduled for the meeting; or you may
contact the Board’s Web site at https://
www.federalreserve.gov for an electronic
announcement that not only lists
applications, but also indicates
procedural and other information about
the meeting.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, January 26, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07–428 Filed 1–26–07; 3:54 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Granting of Request for Early
Termination of the Waiting Period
Under the Premerger Notification
Rules
Section 7A of the Clayton Act, 15
U.S.C. 18a, as added by Title II of the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act of 1976, requires
persons contemplating certain mergers
or acquisitions to give the Federal Trade
Commission and the Assistant Attorney
General advance notice and to wait
designated periods before
consummation of such plans. Section
7A(b)(2) of the Act permits the agencies,
in individual cases, to terminate this
waiting period prior to its expiration
and requires that notice of this action be
published in the Federal Register.The
following transactions were granted
early termination of the waiting period
provided by law and the premerger
notification rules. The grants were made
by the Federal Trade Commission and
the Assistant Attorney General for the
Antitrust Division of the Department of
Justice. Neither agency intends to take
any action with respect to these
proposed acquisitions during the
applicable waiting period.
Acquired
Entities
Transactions Granted Early Termination—01/03/2007
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
20061489 ...........
Allied Waste Industries, Inc ...................
Waste Services, Inc ...............................
20070494 ...........
20070496 ...........
20070498 ...........
Forest Laboratories, Inc .........................
Carlyle Partners IV, L.P .........................
Odyssey Investment Partners Fund III,
L.P.
CPG International Holdings LP ..............
Natixis ....................................................
Torchmark Corporation ..........................
Cerexa, Inc .............................................
ElkCorp ..................................................
DLJ Merchant Banking Partners III, L.P
20070501 ...........
20070502 ...........
20070503 ...........
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:36 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Pro-Cell, LLC .........................................
Hansberger Group, Inc ..........................
Barry Wolf ..............................................
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM
Cactus Waste Systems, LLC, Waste
Services of Arizona, Inc.
Cerexa, Inc.
ElkCorp.
WQP Holdings, Inc.
Pro-Cell, LLC.
Hansberger Group, Inc.
Direct Marketing Advertising Distributors.
30JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4263-4264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1357]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Submission for OMB Review
AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
ACTION: Final notice of submission for OMB review.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) hereby gives notice that
it has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request
to approve a new information collection as described below.
DATES: Written comments on this final notice must be submitted on or
before March 1, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The Request for Clearance (SF 83-I), supporting statement,
and other documents submitted to OMB for review may be obtained from:
Brett Brenner, Attorney Advisor, 1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC
20507. Comments on this final notice must be submitted to Brenda
Aguilar, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10235, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or electronically mailed to
baguilar@omb.eop.gov. Comments should also be sent to Stephen
Llewellyn, Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat, Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, 10th Floor, 1801 L Street, NW., Washington, DC
20507. As a convenience to commentators, the Executive Secretariat will
accept comments totaling six or fewer pages by facsimile (``FAX'')
machine. This limitation is necessary to assure access to the
equipment. The telephone number of the FAX receiver is (202) 663-4114.
(This is not a toll-free number.) Receipt of FAX transmittals will not
be acknowledged, except that the sender may request confirmation of
receipt by calling the Executive Secretariat staff at (202) 663-4070
(voice) or (202) 663-4074 (TTY). (These are not toll-free telephone
numbers.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Pierre, Director, Field
Management Programs, Office of Field Programs, at (202) 663-7115. This
notice is also available in the following formats: large print,
Braille, audio tape and electronic file on computer disk. Requests for
this notice in an alternative format should be made to the EEOC
Publications Center at 1-800-669-3362.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice that EEOC would be submitting this
request was published in the Federal Register on September 7, 2006,
allowing for a 60-day public comment period. Two comments were
received. The first comment questioned whether the three questions were
enough to serve as the ``sole component, or perhaps even the primary
component, of an accurate evaluation'' of the Contact Center's quality
of service. The comment asked that the questionnaire be expanded to
include more questions to provide a ``significantly more precise and
thorough sense of potential claimants' experience'' with the Center.
The suggested additions to the questionnaire dealt with responsiveness,
e.g., the type of information requested, if it was communicated
clearly, if it was answered in a timely fashion and if the Center was
able to answer the caller's question. The second comment, besides
expressing general opposition to the Contact Center as a whole, states
that the survey is not an adequate indicator of performance and
expresses concern that the survey is too short.
The EEOC is not relying on the three questions in the customer
service survey as the sole, or even the primary, indicator of Contact
Center performance. However, capturing the level of customer
satisfaction is important and is a factor in judging the performance of
the Center. Additionally, the Contact Center currently collects data
and performance metrics that answer many of the concerns expressed in
the comment, including the time it takes to answer a call and the type
of information requested by a caller. Further, the EEOC regularly
monitors calls on a live and recorded basis to ensure the accuracy and
quality of the information provided by the Center. Therefore, we
believe that the customer survey is adequate for its intended purpose.
Overview of This Information Collection
Collection Title: EEOC National Contact Center Customer
Satisfaction Survey.
OMB No.: None.
Frequency of Report: On occasion.
Description of Affected Public: Individuals or households;
Businesses or other for profit, not-for-profit institutions; state or
local governments.
Responses: 200,000.
Reporting Hours: 5,722.
Federal Cost: 0.
Abstract: Voluntary customer satisfaction survey for the users of
the EEOC National Contact Center. The survey is necessary to gauge
customer satisfaction and to assist in determining contract performance
and guide possible changes in the operation of the Contact Center.
Burden Statement: The estimated number of respondents is
approximately 200,000 people. Over the past six months, the NCC has
averaged approximately 51,000 contacts from the public each month.
Because the survey is voluntary there is no way to accurately predict
the number of users who will agree to take the survey. The contractor
estimates that, based on its experience with similar surveys the
response rate will be between 25% and 35%. The contractor also
estimates that if the respondent does not need to have the satisfaction
questions repeated and responds immediately after hearing the complete
response, the survey will take approximately 1 minute 43 seconds to
administer. The burden is estimated at 5,722 hours. We estimated
200,000 annual surveys completed at 1 minute and 43 seconds per survey.
There is no annualized cost to respondents.
[[Page 4264]]
Dated: January 19, 2007.
For the Commission.
Naomi C. Earp,
Chair.
[FR Doc. E7-1357 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P