Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts, 4372-4398 [E7-1349]
Download as PDF
4372
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
UNITED STATES SENTENCING
COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United
States Courts
United States Sentencing
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments
to sentencing guidelines, policy
statements, and commentary. Request
for public comment, including public
comment regarding retroactive
application of any of the proposed
amendments. Notice of public hearing.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 994(a),
(o), and (p) of title 28, United States
Code, the United States Sentencing
Commission is considering
promulgating certain amendments to the
sentencing guidelines, policy
statements, and commentary. This
notice sets forth the proposed
amendments and, for each proposed
amendment, a synopsis of the issues
addressed by that amendment. This
notice also provides multiple issues for
comment, some of which are contained
within proposed amendments.
The specific proposed amendments
and issues for comment in this notice
are as follows: (A) Proposed amendment
to §§ 2A1.1 (First Degree Murder), 2A1.2
(Second Degree Murder), 2A1.3
(Voluntary Manslaughter), 2A1.4
(Involuntary Manslaughter), 2A2.1
(Assault with Intent to Commit Murder;
Attempted Murder), 2A2.2 (Aggravated
Assault), 2A2.3 (Minor Assault), 2A2.4
(Obstructing or Impeding Officers),
2A5.2 (Interference with Flight Crew
Member or Flight Attendant;
Interference with Dispatch, Operation,
or Maintenance of Mass Transportation
Vehicle or a Ferry), 2A6.1 (Threatening
or Harrassing Communications;
Hoaxes), 2B1.1 (Fraud, Theft, and
Property Damage), 2C1.1 (Offering,
Giving, Soliciting, or Receiving a Bribe;
Extortion Under Color of Official Right;
Fraud Involving the Deprivation of the
Intangible Right to Honest Services of
Public Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud
by Interference with Governmental
Functions), 2B2.3 (Trespass), 2K1.4
(Arson; Property Damage by Use of
Explosives), 2M6.1 (Nuclear, Biological,
and Chemical Weapons, and Other
Weapons of Mass Destruction), 2Q1.1
(Knowing Endangerment Resulting
From Mishandling Hazardous or Toxic
Substances, Pesticides or Other
Pollutants), 2X1.1 (Attempt,
Solicitation, or Conspiracy (Not Covered
by a Specific Offense Guideline)), 2X5.2
(Class A Misdemeanor Offenses (Not
Covered by a Specific Offense
Guideline)), Appendix A, and issues for
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
comment regarding implementation of
the USA PATRIOT Improvement and
Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L.
109–177 (hereinafter the ‘‘PATRIOT
Act’’) and the Safe, Accountable,
Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity
Act: A Legacy for Users, Pub. L. 109–59,
as these laws pertain to transportation
offenses; (B) proposed amendment to
Chapter Two, Parts A and G, §§ 2A3.1
(Criminal Sexual Abuse; Attempt to
Commit Criminal Sexual Abuse), 2A3.3
(Criminal Sexual Abuse of a Ward or
Attempt to Commit Such Acts), 2A3.4
(Abusive Sexual Contact or Attempt to
Commit Abusive Sexual Contact), 2G1.1
(Promoting a Commercial Sex Act or
Prohibited Sexual Conduct with an
Individual Other than a Minor), 2G1.3
(Promoting a Commercial Sex Act or
Prohibited Sexual Conduct with a
Minor; Transportation of Minors to
Engage in a Commercial Sex Act or
Prohibited Sexual Conduct), 2G2.5
(Recordkeeping Offenses Involving the
Production of Sexually Explicit
Materials; Failure to Provide Required
Marks in Commercial Electronic Email),
2G3.1 (Importing, Mailing, or
Transporting Obscene Matter;
Transferring Obscene Matter to a Minor;
Misleading Domain Names), 2H3.1
(Interception of Communications;
Eavesdropping; Disclosure of Tax
Return Information), 2J1.2 (Obstruction
of Justice), 4B1.5 (Repeat and Dangerous
Sex Offender Against Minors), 5B1.3
(Conditions of Probation), 5D1.2 (Term
of Supervised Release), 5D1.3
(Conditions of Supervised Release),
Appendix A, and issues for comment
regarding implementation of the Adam
Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act
of 2006, Pub. L. 109–248 (hereinafter the
‘‘Adam Walsh Act’’); (C) proposed
amendment to re-promulgate as a
permanent amendment the temporary,
emergency amendment to § 2B5.3
(Criminal Infringement of Copyright or
Trademark), effective September 12,
2006 (see USSG Supplement to
Appendix C (Amendment 682)), and
issues for comment regarding
implementation of the Stop
Counterfeiting in Manufactured Goods
Act, Pub. L. 109–181; (D) proposed
amendment to Chapter Two, Parts D and
X, §§ 2A1.1, 2A1.2, 2B1.1, 2B1.5 (Theft
of, Damage to, or Destruction of Cultural
Heritage Resources; Unlawful Sale,
Purchase, Exchange, Transportation, or
Receipt of Cultural Heritage Resources),
2D1.1 (Unlawful Manufacturing,
Importing, Exporting, or Trafficking
(Including Possession with Intent to
Commit These Offenses); Attempt or
Conspiracy), 2E4.1 (Unlawful Conduct
Relating to Contraband Cigarettes),
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
2K1.3 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or
Transportation of Explosive Materials;
Prohibited Transactions Involving
Explosive Materials), 2K1.4, 2M5.3
(Providing Material Support or
Resources to Designated Foreign
Terrorism Organizations of For a
Terrorist Purpose), 2M6.1, 2Q2.1
(Offenses Involving Fish, Wildlife, and
Plants), 2X1.1, 2X2.1 (Aiding and
Abetting), 2X3.1 (Accessory After the
Fact), Appendix A, and issues for
comment regarding implementation of
the PATRIOT Act and the Department of
Homeland Security Appropriations Act,
2007, Pub. L. 109–295, as these laws
pertain to terrorism offenses and border
protection; (E) proposed amendment to
§§ 2D1.1, 2D1.11 (Unlawfully
Distributing, Importing, Exporting, or
Possessing a Listed Chemical; Attempt
or Conspiracy), Appendix A (Statutory
Index), and issues for comment
regarding implementation of the
PATRIOT Act and the Adam Walsh Act
as these laws pertain to drug offenses;
(F) proposed amendment to §§ 2L1.1
(Smuggling, Transporting, or Harboring
an Unlawful Alien), 2L1.2 (Unlawfully
Entering or Remaining in the United
States), 2L2.1 (Trafficking in a
Document Relating to Naturalization,
Citizenship, or Legal Resident Status, or
a United States Passport; False
Statement in Respect to the Citizenship
or Immigration Status of Another;
Fraudulent Marriage to Assist Alien to
Evade Immigration Law), and 2L2.2
(Fraudulently Acquiring Documents
Relating to Naturalization, Citizenship,
or Legal Resident Status for Own Use;
False Personation or Fraudulent
Marriage by Alien to Evade Immigration
Law; Fraudulently Acquiring or
Improperly Using a United States
Passport); (G)(1) proposed amendment
to § 2B2.3 (Trespass) to implement the
Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes
Act, Pub. L. 109–228; (2) proposed
amendment to § 2H3.1 to implement the
Violence Against Women and
Department of Justice Reauthorization
Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109–162; and (3)
issue for comment regarding
implementation of the SAFE Port Act,
Pub. L. 109–347; (H) proposed
amendment to (1) §§ 2B1.1, 2D1.11,
2K2.1 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or
Transportation of Firearms or
Ammunition; Prohibited Transactions
Involving Firearms or Ammunition),
and 2L1.1 to correct typographical
errors; and (2) Chapter Three, Part D
(Introductory Commentary) and § 3D1.1
(Procedure for Determining Offense
Level on Multiple Counts) to address
cases involving multiple counts
contained in multiple indictments; (I)
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
issue for comment regarding § 1B1.13
(Reduction in Term of Imprisonment as
a Result of Motion by Director of Bureau
of Prisons); (J) issues for comment
regarding application of certain criminal
history rules under § 4A1.2 (Definitions
and Instructions for Computing
Criminal History); (K) issue for
comment regarding implementation of
section 4 of the Telephone Records and
Privacy Protection Act of 2006, Pub. L.
109–476, which provides the
Commission with emergency
amendment authority to amend the
guidelines applicable to persons
convicted of an offense under 18 U.S.C.
§ 1039; and (L) issue for comment
regarding federal cocaine sentencing
policy.
DATES: (A) Proposed Amendments.—
Written public comment regarding the
proposed amendments and issues for
comment set forth in this notice,
including public comment regarding
retroactive application of any of the
proposed amendments, should be
received by the Commission not later
than March 30, 2007.
(B) Public Hearing.—The Commission
will be scheduling a public hearing on
its proposed amendments. Further
information regarding the public
hearing, including requirements for
testifying and providing written
testimony, as well as the date of the
hearing, will be provided by the
Commission on its Web site at
www.ussc.gov.
Public comment should be
sent to: United States Sentencing
Commission, One Columbus Circle, NE.,
Suite 2–500, Washington, DC 20002–
8002, Attention: Public Affairs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, Telephone: (202) 502–4597.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial
branch of the United States
Government. The Commission
promulgates sentencing guidelines and
policy statements for federal courts
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The
Commission also periodically reviews
and revises previously promulgated
guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o)
and submits guideline amendments to
the Congress not later than the first day
of May of each year pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 994(p).
The Commission seeks comment on
the proposed amendments, issues for
comment, and any other aspect of the
sentencing guidelines, policy
statements, and commentary. In
addition to the issues for comment
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
presented in the proposed amendments,
the Commission requests comment
regarding simplification of the
guidelines. Specifically, with respect to
the guidelines that are the subject of the
following proposed amendments,
should the Commission make additional
amendments to simplify those
guidelines and, if so, how?
The Commission also requests public
comment regarding whether the
Commission should specify for
retroactive application to previously
sentenced defendants any of the
proposed amendments published in this
notice. The Commission requests
comment regarding which, if any, of the
proposed amendments that may result
in a lower guideline range should be
made retroactive to previously
sentenced defendants pursuant to
§ 1B1.10 (Reduction in Term of
Imprisonment as a Result of Amended
Guideline Range).
The proposed amendments in this
notice are presented in one of two
formats. First, some of the amendments
are proposed as specific revisions to a
guideline or commentary. Bracketed text
within a proposed amendment indicates
a heightened interest on the
Commission’s part in comment and
suggestions regarding alternative policy
choices; for example, a proposed
enhancement of [2] [4] [6] levels
indicates that the Commission is
considering, and invites comment on,
alternative policy choices regarding the
appropriate level of enhancement.
Similarly, bracketed text within a
specific offense characteristic or
application note means that the
Commission specifically invites
comment on whether the proposed
provision is appropriate. Second, the
Commission has highlighted certain
issues for comment and invites
suggestions on how the Commission
should respond to those issues.
Additional information pertaining to
the proposed amendments described in
this notice may be accessed through the
Commission’s Web site at
www.ussc.gov.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. § 994(a), (o), (p), (x);
USSC Rules of Practice and Procedure, Rule
4.4.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Transportation
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment:
This proposed amendment implements
a number of provisions of the USA
PATRIOT Improvement and
Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L.
109–177 (hereinafter ‘‘PATRIOT Act’’)
and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4373
Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users, Pub. L. 109–59
(hereinafter ‘‘SAFETEA–LU’’). The
proposed amendments also provide a
corresponding amendment to Appendix
A (Statutory Index). Specifically:
(A) Section 110 of the PATRIOT Act
strikes 18 U.S.C. §§ 1992 and 1993 and
creates a new section 1992 (Terrorist
attacks and other violence against
railroad carriers and against mass
transportation systems on land, on
water, or through the air). The
legislation creates a statutory maximum
term of imprisonment of 20 years and
includes a penalty of imprisonment for
any years or life or, if the offense
resulted in the death of any person, the
defendant may be sentenced to death.
There are exceptions to the life and
death sentences for cases of
surveillance, conveying false
information, or attempting, threatening,
or conspiring to engage in any violation
under this section. The statute also
contains aggravated offenses. First, a
sentence of life or death may be
imposed when the offense involved
railroad on-track equipment or a mass
transportation vehicle carrying a
passenger or employee, or carrying
hazardous material, or both. Second, a
life or death sentence may be given if
the offense was committed with the
intent to endanger the safety of any
person, or with a reckless disregard for
the safety of any person, when the
railroad on-track equipment or mass
transportation vehicle was carrying a
defined hazardous material at the time
of the offense.
The proposed amendment updates all
references to 18 U.S.C. 1992 and
eliminates all references to 18 U.S.C.
1993. The proposed amendment also
adds 18 U.S.C. 1992 to the referenced
statutory provisions in §§ 2A1.1 (First
Degree Murder), 2A2.1 (Assault with
Intent to Commit Murder; Attempted
Murder), and 2A5.2 (Interference with
Flight Crew Member or Flight
Attendant; Interference with Dispatch,
Operation, or Maintenance of Mass
Transportation Vehicle or a Ferry).
Additionally, the amendment adjusts
the definition of ‘‘mass transportation’’
in §§ 2A1.4, 2A5.2, and 2K1.4 (Arson;
Property Damage by Use of Explosives)
to reflect the new defining section, 18
U.S.C. 1992(d)(7). Also proposed is the
addition of ‘‘Navigation’’ to the title and
text of § 2A5.2 to better reflect the full
scope of the newly created 18 U.S.C.
1992.
(B) Section 302 of the PATRIOT Act
increases the scope of 18 U.S.C. 1036
(Entry by false pretenses to any real
property, vessel, or aircraft of the United
States or secure area of any airport) by
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
4374
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
adding to the areas protected from
illegal entry under this title secure and
restricted areas of a seaport. Section 302
also increases the statutory maximum
penalty from five years to ten years.
The proposed amendment refers this
offense to § 2B2.3(b)(1) and adds
seaports to the list of protected areas
warranting a two-level enhancement.
The amendment also adds a definition
for ‘‘seaport’’, as one does not currently
exist in the guidelines.
(C) Section 303 of the PATRIOT Act
adds a new offense at 18 U.S.C. 2237
(Criminal sanctions for failure to heave
to, obstruction of boarding, or providing
false information). This new statute
makes it a crime to refuse to stop a
vessel in violation of a federal law
enforcement officer’s order or to provide
materially false information to a federal
law enforcement officer during a
boarding of a vessel.
The proposed amendment references
this new offense to §§ 2A2.4
(Obstructing or Impeding Officers) and
2B1.1 (Fraud, Theft, and Property
Damage).
(D) Section 306 of the PATRIOT Act
provides new offenses in 18 U.S.C. 2291
(Destruction of vessel or maritime
facility) and 2292 (Imparting or
conveying false information). Section
2291 of title 18, United States Code,
covers the destruction of vessels and
maritime facilities and creates a
statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of 20 years. If the conduct
under this section involves a vessel
carrying nuclear or radioactive waste, a
statutory maximum life sentence
applies, and if death results, a life or
death sentence is possible. Section 2292
of title 18, United States Code, prohibits
providing false information regarding an
attempt or alleged attempt to commit a
crime and provides a statutory
maximum sentence of five years.
The proposed amendment references
18 U.S.C. 2291 to 2A1.1 (First Degree
Murder), 2A1.2 (Second Degree
Murder), 2A1.3 (Voluntary
Manslaughter), 2A1.4 (Involuntary
Manslaughter), 2A2.1 (Assault with
Intent to Commit Murder; Attempted
Murder), 2A2.2 (Aggravated Assault),
2A2.3 (Minor Assault), 2A6.1
(Threatening or Harrassing
Communications; Hoaxes), 2B1.1
(Fraud, Theft, and Property Damage),
2K1.4 (Arson; Property Damage by Use
of Explosives) and 2M6.1 (Nuclear,
Biological, and Chemical Weapons, and
Other Weapons of Mass Destruction).
Section 2292 of title 18, United States
Code, is referenced to § 2A6.1.
(E) Section 307(c) of the PATRIOT Act
directs the Commission to review the
guidelines to determine whether a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
sentencing enhancement is appropriate
for any offense under sections 659 or
2311 of title 18, United States Code.
The proposed amendment provides
two options to respond to this directive.
Option 1 amends § 2B1.1(b)(4) to
provide an alternative enhancement if
the defendant was convicted under 18
U.S.C. 659. An issue for comment also
requests input regarding whether any
such enhancement should include
convictions under 18 U.S.C. 2312 and
2313. Option 2 responds to the directive
by revising § 2B1.1(b)(11). Currently this
section provides a minimum offense
level of 14 for offenses involving an
organized scheme to steal vehicles or
vehicle parts. The proposed amendment
adds convictions under 18 U.S.C. 659 to
this section and also provides a twolevel increase for all cases covered
under the subsection.
(F) Section 308 of the PATRIOT Act
increases the statutory maximum
penalties for 18 U.S.C. 2199 (Stowaways
on vessels or aircraft). Absent any
aggravating factors, the statutory
maximum for offenses is increased from
one year to five years. Section 308 adds
a statutory maximum of 20 years if a
person acts with the intent to commit
serious bodily injury and serious bodily
injury occurs. For offenses involving the
intent to kill and death occurs, section
308 also adds a penalty of imprisonment
for any term of years, including life or
death.
The proposed amendment references
18 U.S.C. 2199 to 2A1.1 (First Degree
Murder), 2A1.2 (Second Degree
Murder), 2A1.3 (Voluntary
Manslaughter), 2A1.4 (Involuntary
Manslaughter), 2A2.1 (Assault with
Intent to Commit Murder; Attempted
Murder), 2A2.2 (Aggravated Assault),
and 2A2.3 (Minor Assault).
(G) Section 4210 of SAFETEA–LU
creates a new offense at 49 U.S.C. 14915
for failure to release household goods
with a statutory maximum of two years.
The proposed amendment references
this section to § 2B1.1 as it is the most
analogous guideline.
(H) Section 4102(b) of SAFETEA–LU
creates a new criminal violation for
violating a commercial motor vehicle’s
out-of-service order. The offense carries
a statutory maximum of one year.
The proposed amendment references
this section to § 2X5.2 (Class A
Misdemeanor (Not Covered by Another
Specific Offense Guideline)).
The proposed amendment also
includes five issues for comment
pertaining to the following:
(1) Section 7121 of SAFETEA–LU
creates a new aggravated felony under
49 U.S.C. 5124 that carries a statutory
maximum of 10 years when conduct
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
under the section results in the release
of a hazardous material that causes
bodily injury or death. Appendix A
(Statutory Index) currently references 49
U.S.C. 5124 to § 2Q1.2 (Mishandling of
Hazardous or Toxic Substances or
Pesticides; Recordkeeping, Tampering,
and Falsification; Unlawfully
Transporting Hazardous Materials in
Commerce). An issue for comment asks
whether penalties under § 2Q1.2 are
adequate for the new offense.
(2) The proposed amendment adds
seaports to the two-level enhancement
in § 2B2.3(b)(1). Section 2B2.3(c) also
provides a cross reference if the offense
was committed with the intent to
commit another criminal offense. An
issue for comment asks whether, as an
alternative to the cross reference
provision and as a possible means of
simplifying this guideline, it should
amend § 2B2.3 (Trespass) to provide
instead a general specific offense
characteristic for any trespass offense
that was committed with the intent to
commit another offense.
(3) Section 309 of the PATRIOT Act
creates a new offense at 18 U.S.C. 226
(Bribery affecting port security), making
it a crime to knowingly, and with the
intent to commit international or
domestic terrorism, bribe a public
official to affect port security. It is also
a crime under this section to be the
recipient of such a bribe in return for
being influenced in the performance of
public duties affecting port security
with the knowledge that such influence
will be used to commit or plan to
commit an act of terrorism.
The proposed amendment references
18 U.S.C. 226 to § 2C1.1 (Offering,
Giving, Soliciting, or Receiving a Bribe;
Extortion Under Color of Official Right;
Fraud Involving the Deprivation of the
Intangible Right to Honest Services of
Public Official; Conspiracy to Defraud
by Interference with Governmental
Functions).
An issue for comment addresses this
proposed reference to § 2C1.1 as well as
the operation of the cross reference in
§ 2C1.1(c)(1) in cases involving an intent
to commit an act of international or
domestic terrorism.
(4) Whether the Commission should
use the term ‘‘mass transportation’’ or
‘‘public transportation’’ in the context of
§ 2A5.2 and other guidelines.
(5) The proposed amendment
provides options for increasing
penalties for offenses under 18 U.S.C.
659. An issue for comment asks whether
the Commission also should provide
similar increases for offenses under 18
U.S.C. 2312 (Transportation of stolen
vehicles) and 2313 (Sale or receipt of
stolen vehicles).
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
Proposed Amendment
The Commentary to § 2A1.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘1992(a)(7),’’ after
‘‘1841(a)(2)(C),’’; and by inserting ‘‘2199,
2291,’’ after ‘‘2118(c)(2),’’.
The Commentary to § 2A1.2 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘2199, 2291,’’ after
‘‘1841(a)(2)(C),’’.
The Commentary to § 2A1.3 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘2199, 2291,’’ after
‘‘1841(a)(2)(C),’’.
The Commentary to § 2A1.4 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘2199, 2291,’’ after
‘‘1841(a)(2)(C),’’.
The Commentary to § 2A1.4 captioned
‘‘Application Note’’ is amended in Note
1 by striking ‘‘18 U.S.C. 1993(c)(5)’’ and
inserting ‘‘18 U.S.C. 1992(d)(7)’’.
The Commentary to § 2A2.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
striking ‘‘1993(a)(6)’’ and inserting
‘‘1992(a)(7), 2199, 2291’’.
The Commentary to § 2A2.2 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
striking ‘‘1993(a)(6)’’ and inserting
‘‘1992(a)(7), 2199, 2291’’.
The Commentary to § 2A2.3 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘, 2199, 2291’’ after ‘‘1751(e)’’.
The Commentary to § 2A2.4 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘2237(a)(1), (a)(2)(A),’’ after
‘‘1502,’’.
Section 2A5.2 is amended in the
heading by inserting ‘‘Navigation,’’ after
‘‘Dispatch,’’; and by striking ‘‘or Ferry’’.
Sections 2A5.2(a)(1) and (a)(2) are
amended by striking the comma after
‘‘facility’’ each place it appears and
inserting ‘‘or’’; and by striking ‘‘, or a
ferry’’ each place it appears.
The Commentary to § 2A5.2 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
striking ‘‘1993(a)(4), (5), (6), (b);’’ and
inserting ‘‘1992(a)(1), (a)(4), (a)(5),
(a)(6);’’.
The Commentary to § 2A5.2 captioned
‘‘Application Note’’ is amended in Note
1 in the last paragraph by striking ‘‘18
U.S.C. 1993(c)(5)’’ and inserting ‘‘18
U.S.C. 1992(d)(7)’’.
The Commentary to § 2A6.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
striking ‘‘1993(a)(7), (8),’’ and inserting
‘‘1992(a)(9), (a)(10), 2291(a)(8), 2291(e),
2292,’’.
[Option 1 (Section 659 offenses)
Section 2B1.1 is amended in
subsection (b)(4) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’
before ‘‘offense involved’’; and by
striking ‘‘property, increase’’ and
inserting ‘‘; or (B) defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. § increase’’.]
The Commentary to § 2B1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Note 5 by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(b)(4)’’
each place it appears.]
[Option 2 (Section 659 offenses)
Section 2B1.1 is amended in subsection
(b)(11) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before
‘‘offense involved’’; and by striking ‘‘,
and’’ and inserting ‘‘; or (B) defendant
was convicted under 18 U.S.C. 659,
increase by 2 levels. If’’.]
The Commentary to § 2B1.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘(a)(1), (a)(5)’’ after ‘‘1992’’; by
striking ‘‘1993(a)(1), (a)(4),’’; by
inserting ‘‘2291,’’ after ‘‘2113(b),’’; and
by inserting ‘‘14915,’’ after ‘‘49 U.S.C.
§§ ’’.
The Commentary to § 2B1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended by
striking Note 10 and inserting the
following:
‘‘10. Application of Subsection
(b)(11).—Subsection (b)(11) provides a
minimum offense level in the case of an
ongoing, sophisticated operation (such
as an auto theft ring or ’chop shop’) to
steal vehicles or vehicle parts, or to
receive stolen vehicles or vehicle parts.
This subsection also applies if the
defendant was convicted of cargo theft
under 18 U.S.C. 659. For purposes of
this subsection, ’vehicle’ means motor
vehicle, vessel, or aircraft.’’.
The Commentary to § 2B1.1 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended in the
paragraph that begins ‘‘A minimum
offense level of level 14’’ by striking
‘‘Therefore, the’’ and inserting ‘‘The’’;
by inserting ‘‘in subsection (b)(11)(A)’’
after ‘‘is used’’; and by adding at the end
the following:
‘‘The minimum offense level also
applies to convictions under 18 U.S.C.
659 for offenses involving cargo theft.
Subsection (b)(11)(B) implements the
directive in section 307 of Public Law
109–177.’’.]
Section 2B2.3 is amended in
subsection (b)(1) by striking ‘‘secured’’
each place it appears and inserting
‘‘secure’’; by redesignating subdivisions
(E) and (F) as subdivisions (F) and (G),
respectively; and by inserting the
following after ‘‘airport;’’:
‘‘(E) in a secure area within a
seaport;’’.
The Commentary to § 2B2.3 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘, 2199’’ after ‘‘1036’’.
The Commentary to § 2B2.3 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 1 by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘ ‘Seaport’ has the meaning given that
term in 18 U.S.C. 26.’’.
The Commentary to § 2B2.3 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended by striking ‘‘,
such as nuclear facilities,’’ and inserting
‘‘(such as nuclear facilities) and other
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4375
locations (such as airports and
seaports)’’.
The Commentary to § 2C1.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘226,’’ after ‘‘§§ 201(b)(1),
(2),’’.
The Commentary to § 2K1.4 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(4)’’ after
‘‘1992’’; by striking ‘‘1993(a)(1), (a)(2),
(a)(3), (b),’’; and by inserting ‘‘2291,’’
after ‘‘2275’’.
The Commentary to § 2K1.4 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 1 by striking ‘‘18 U.S.C.
1993(c)(5)’’ and inserting ‘‘18 U.S.C.
1992(d)(7)’’.
The Commentary to § 2M6.1
captioned ‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is
amended by striking ‘‘1993(a)(2), (3), (b),
2332a (only with respect to weapons of
mass destruction as defined in 18 U.S.C.
2332a(c)(2)(B), (C), and (D))’’ and
inserting ‘‘1992(a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (b)(2),
2291,’’.
The Commentary to § 2Q1.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘18 U.S.C. 1992(b)(3);’’ before
‘‘33 U.S.C. 1319(c)(3);’’.
Section 2X1.1 is amended in
subsection (d)(1)(A) by inserting ‘‘(a)(1)–
(a)(7), (a)(9), (a)(10)’’ after ‘‘1992;’’; and
in subsection (d)(1)(B) by inserting
‘‘and’’ after ‘‘§ 32;’’; and by striking ‘‘18
U.S.C. 1993; and’’.
The Commentary to § 2X5.2 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘; 49 U.S.C. 31310’’ after
‘‘14133’’.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. 225 the
following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 226 2C1.1’’; by inserting
after the line referenced to 18 U.S.C.
1035 the following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 1036 2B2.3’’; by striking
the line referenced to 18 U.S.C. 1992
through the end of the line referenced
to 18 U.S.C. 1993(b) and inserting the
following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(1)—2A5.2, 2B1.1,
2K1.4, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(2)—2K1.4, 2M6.1,
2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(3)—2M6.1, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(4)—2A5.2, 2K1.4,
2M6.1, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(5)—2A5.2, 2B1.1,
2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(6)—2A5.2, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(7)—2A1.1, 2A2.1,
2A2.2, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(8)—2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(9)—2A6.1, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(10)—2A6.1, 2X1.1’’;
in the line referenced to 18 U.S.C. 2199
by inserting ‘‘2A1.1, 2A1.2, 2A1.3,
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
4376
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
2A1.4, 2A2.1, 2A2.2, 2A2.3,’’ before
‘‘2B1.1’’; by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. 2233 the
following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 2237(a)(1), (a)(2)(A)—2A2.4
18 U.S.C. 2237(a)(2)(B)—2B1.1’’;
by inserting after the line referenced to
18 U.S.C. § 2281 the following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 2291—2A1.1, 2A1.2, 2A1.3,
2A1.4, 2A2.1, 2A2.2, 2A2.3, 2A6.1,
2B1.1, 2K1.4, 2M6.1
18 U.S.C. 2292—2A6.1’’;
by inserting after the line referenced to
49 U.S.C. 14912’’ the following:
‘‘49 U.S.C. 14915—2B1.1’’; and
by inserting after the line referenced to
49 U.S.C. 30170’’ the following:
‘‘49 U.S.C. 31310—2X5.2’’.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Issues for Comment
1. The SAFETEA–LU Act, Pub. L.
109–59, amended 49 U.S.C. 5124 to
provide a new aggravated felony, with a
10-year statutory maximum term of
imprisonment, for cases involving a
release of a hazardous material that
results in death or bodily injury.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) references
49 U.S.C. § 5124 to § 2Q1.2
(Mishandling of Hazardous or Toxic
Substances or Pesticides;
Recordkeeping, Tampering, and
Falsification; Unlawfully Transporting
Hazardous Materials in Commerce). In
2004 the Commission amended § 2Q1.2
to provide a two-level enhancement in
§ 2Q1.2(b)(7) for defendants convicted
of 49 U.S.C. 5124 or 46312 because
‘‘[t]hese offenses pose an inherent risk
to large populations in a manner not
typically associated with other pollution
offenses sentenced under the same
guideline. See USSG App. C
(Amendment 672) (effective Nov. 1,
2004). In addition to application of
§ 2Q1.2(b)(7), a defendant convicted of
49 U.S.C. 5124 likely would receive a
four-level enhancement under
§ 2Q1.2(b)(1)(B) for a release of a
hazardous substance (because the
offense of conviction necessarily
involves such a release) and a nine-level
enhancement for the substantial
likelihood of death or serious bodily
injury under § 2Q1.2(b)(2). When added
to the Base Offense Level of 8, the
minimum offense level under § 2Q1.2
would be level 23 (46–57 months at
CHC I). Further, Application Note 6
states that an upward departure would
be warranted in any case in which death
or serious bodily injury results. The
Commission requests comment
regarding whether § 2Q1.2 currently
provides adequate penalties for a
defendant convicted under 49 U.S.C.
5124. If not, how should the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Commission amend § 2Q1.2 to address
adequately these offenses? For example,
should the Commission provide an
enhancement greater than two levels for
such offenses? Should the Commission
provide a minimum offense level for 49
U.S.C. 5124 offenses that actually result
in death or serious bodily injury?
2. The USA PATRIOT Improvement
and Reauthorization Act of 2005, Public
Law 109–177, amended 18 U.S.C. 1036
to add seaports to the list of covered
locations and to increase the statutory
maximum term of imprisonment from 5
years to 10 years. The proposed
amendment adds seaports to the twolevel enhancement in § 2B2.3(b)(1).
Section 2B2.3 (Trespass) also provides a
cross reference in subsection (c) if the
offense was committed with the intent
to commit a felony offense. The
Commission requests comment
regarding whether, as an alternative to
the cross reference provision, and as a
possible means of simplifying this
guideline, it should amend § 2B2.3 to
provide instead a general specific
offense characteristic for any trespass
offense that was committed with the
intent to commit a felony. If so, how
many levels would be appropriate?
Should the Commission consider
amending § 2B2.3(b)(1) to provide an
additional increase if the trespass on
any of the enumerated locations was
committed with the intent to commit a
felony offense?
3. The USA PATRIOT Improvement
and Reauthorization Act provided a new
offense at 18 U.S.C. 226 for bribery
affecting port security. The provision
criminalizes bribery with the intent to
commit international terrorism or
domestic terrorism and provides a
statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of 15 years. In general,
the guidelines reference bribery offenses
to § 2C1.1 (Offering, Giving, Soliciting,
or Receiving a Bribe; Extortion Under
Color of Official Right; Fraud Involving
the Deprivation of the Intangible Right
to Honest Services of Public Officials;
Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference
with Governmental Functions), which
provides alternative base offense levels
of 14, if the defendant was public
official, or 12, otherwise. Section
2C1.1(c)(1) provides a cross reference if
the offense was committed for the
purpose of facilitating the commission
of another criminal offense (and the
guideline applicable to a conspiracy to
commit that other offense results in a
greater offense level than § 2C1.1). The
Commission requests comment
regarding whether it should reference 18
U.S.C. § 226 to § 2C1.1 and, if so,
whether the cross reference provision is
a sufficient means of handling bribery
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
cases involving an intent to commit an
act of international or domestic
terrorism. If the offense is referenced to
§ 2C1.1, should the Commission, as an
alternative to the cross reference
provision and as a possible means of
simplifying this guideline, provide a
specific offense characteristic for
convictions of 18 U.S.C. 226 that results
in an offense level proportionate to
other terrorism-related offenses (e.g.,
providing a minimum offense level of
26 would provide parity with offenses
sentenced under § 2M5.3 (Providing
Material Support or Resources to
Designated Foreign Terrorist
Organizations or for a Terrorist
Purpose)). Alternatively, should the
Commission reference 18 U.S.C. 226 to
2M5.3?
4. In addition to consolidating 18
U.S.C. 1992 and 1993, the USA
PATRIOT Improvement and
Reauthorization Act replaced the term
‘‘public transportation’’ (added by the
SAFETEA–LU Act) with ‘‘mass
transportation’’ (the term used in 18
U.S.C. 1992 prior to SAFETEA–LU).
‘‘Mass transportation’’ now is defined at
18 U.S.C. 1992(d)(7) to have the same
meaning as ‘‘public transportation’’
(defined at 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(7)) except
that, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1992,
‘‘mass transportation’’ includes school
bus, charter, sightseeing transportation,
and passenger vessel. School bus and
charter are otherwise expressly
excluded from the definition of ‘‘public
transportation’’ as are intercity bus
transportation and intercity passenger
rail transportation. The Commission
requests comment regarding the
appropriate term to use in the context of
§ 2A5.2 (Interference with Flight Crew
Member or Flight Attendant;
Interference with Dispatch, Operation,
or Maintenance of Mass Transportation
Vehicle or a Ferry). Specifically, should
the Commission use ‘‘mass
transportation’’ as that term is now
defined by 18 U.S.C. 1992(d)(7) (i.e.,
including school bus, charter,
sightseeing transportation and passenger
vessel) or use the more limited term
‘‘public transportation’’ (i.e., excluding
school bus, charter, intercity bus
transportation, and intercity passenger
rail transportation)?
5. The proposed amendment provides
2 options for amending § 2B1.1 to
address 18 U.S.C. 659 (Cargo theft). The
Commission requests comment
regarding whether, rather than an
enhancement based on the statute of
conviction, it ought to provide an
enhancement based on real offense
conduct such as if the offense involved
cargo theft. The Commission also
requests comment regarding whether it
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
should provide an enhancement for
conduct covered by convictions under
18 U.S.C. 2312 (Transportation of stolen
vehicles) and 2313 (Sale or receipt of
stolen vehicles), either as part of the
proposed enhancement for 18 U.S.C.
659 offenses or as a separate
enhancement.
2. Sex Offenses
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment:
This multi-part proposed amendment
implements the Adam Walsh Child
Protection and Safety Act of 2006,
Public Law 109–248. Part I of this
proposed amendment implements the
directive in section 141 of the Act
pertaining to the new offense in 18
U.S.C. 2250 for failure to register as a
sex offender. The directive instructs the
Commission, in promulgating
guidelines for use of a sentencing court
in determining the sentence to be
imposed for [18 U.S.C. 2250], to
consider the following matters:
(1) Whether the person committed
another sex offense in connection with,
or during, the period for which the
person failed to register.
(2) Whether the person committed an
offense against a minor in connection
with, or during, the period for which the
person failed to register.
(3) Whether the person voluntarily
attempted to correct the failure to
register.
(4) The seriousness of the offense
which gave rise to the requirement to
register, including whether such offense
is a tier I, tier II, or tier III offense, as
those terms are defined in section 111
[of the Act].
(5) Whether the person has been
convicted or adjudicated delinquent for
any offense other than the offense which
gave rise to the requirement to register.
Section 2250 of title 18, United States
Code, provides a statutory maximum
term of imprisonment of ten years for
the failure to register. There is an
additional mandatory consecutive term
of 5 years’ imprisonment applicable if a
person commits a crime of violence
while in failure to register status (18
U.S.C. 2250(c)). The requirements
pertaining to who must register, where
the registration must occur, and for how
long are set forth in 42 U.S.C. 16911.
The proposed amendment provides a
new guideline in § 2A3.5 (Failure to
Register as a Sex Offender). The
proposed amendment presents two
options for addressing the fourth matter
of the directive. Option One provides
multiple base offense levels based on
the category of offense that gave rise to
the registration requirement: level 16 if
the offense that gave rise to the
requirement to register was a Tier III
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
offense; level 14 if the offense that gave
rise to the requirement to register was a
Tier II offense; and level 12 if the
offense that gave rise to the requirement
to register was a Tier I offense. Option
Two provides a base offense level of [12]
and a specific offense characteristic in
§ 2A3.5(b)(1) providing a two-level
increase if the offense that gave rise to
the requirement to register was a Tier II
offense and a four-level increase if the
offense that gave rise to the requirement
to register was a Tier III offense. The
resulting offense level under either
option is the same for each tier of
offense. The definitions for Tier I, II,
and III offenses are the statutory
definitions provided in 42 U.S.C.
16911(2), (3), and (4), respectively.
The first and second matters are
addressed in § 2A3.5(b)(1) of Option
One, and in § 2A3.5(b)(2) of Option
Two. Both options provide alternative
increases based on the type of offense
committed while in a failure to register
status and on whether that offense was
committed against a minor or an adult.
The proposed amendment provides a 6level increase if, while in a failure to
register status, the defendant committed
a sex offense against an adult, or
kidnapped or falsely imprisoned a
minor. If the defendant committed a sex
offense against a minor, the proposed
amendment provides an 8-level increase
and a minimum offense level of [24]–
[28].
The third matter is addressed in
§ 2A3.5(b)(2) in Option One, and in
§ 2A3.5(b)(3) in Option Two. Both
options provide a [2][4]-level decrease if
the defendant voluntarily attempted to
correct the failure to register.
Issues for comment #2 and #3 in Part
V of the proposed amendment request
comment regarding the scope of these
proposed enhancements. Issue for
comment #3 also asks whether the
Commission should include an
instruction that the reduction does not
apply if any of the proposed specific
offense characteristics also apply.
The proposed amendment does not
specifically address the fifth matter
because application of Chapter Four
will take into account whether the
person has been convicted or
adjudicated delinquent for any offense
other than the offense which gave rise
to the requirement to register.
The proposed amendment also
provides another new guideline for
certain aggravated offenses related to the
requirement to register as a sex offender.
As noted previously, 18 U.S.C. 2250(c)
provides a mandatory consecutive term
of 5 years if a crime of violence was
committed while the defendant was in
a failure to register status. Section
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4377
2260A of title 18, United States Code,
provides a mandatory consecutive term
of 10 years’ imprisonment if a person
who is required to register commits an
enumerated offense (including
kidnapping, human trafficking, and
various sex offenses). The new
guideline, § 2A3.6 (Aggravated Offenses
Relating to Registration as a Sex
Offender), will apply to convictions
under 18 U.S.C. 2250(c) or 2260A, and
instructs the court that the guideline
sentence for any such conviction is the
term of imprisonment required by
statute. Neither Chapters Three nor Four
will apply to any count of conviction
covered by this guideline. This
approach is the same approach the
Commission has taken with other
statutes that provide mandatory
consecutive terms of imprisonment,
namely 18 U.S.C. 1028A (see § 2B1.6
(Aggravated Identity Theft) and 18
U.S.C. 924(c) (See § 2K2.4 (Use of
Firearm, Armor-Piercing Ammunition,
or Explosive During or in Relation to
Certain Crimes).)
Part II implements other new offenses
and increased penalties as follows:
(A) The Act provides a mandatory
minimum term of imprisonment of 30
years for convictions under 18 U.S.C.
2241(c) (Aggravated sexual abuse with
children). This statute covers crossing
state lines to engage in the sexual abuse
of a child under the age of 12 years. It
also covers engaging in a sexual act
under the circumstances described in 18
U.S.C. 2241(a) and (b) (force, threat, or
other means) with a child who is
between the ages of 12 years and 16
years and is at least four years younger
than the person who is engaging in the
sexual act. The proposed amendment
provides a base offense level of [40] in
§ 2A3.1 (Criminal Sexual Abuse;
Attempt to Commit Criminal Sexual
Abuse) if the defendant was convicted
under 18 U.S.C. 2241(c). The specific
offense characteristic for the age of the
victim, subsection (b)(2), would not
apply because the higher base offense
level takes into account the age of the
victim. There also is an application note
that instructs the court not to apply the
enhancement in § 2A3.1(b)(1) (four-level
enhancement if the offense involved
conduct described in 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a)
or (b)) if the basis for the conviction
under 18 U.S.C. 2241(c) is that the
defendant engaged in conduct described
in 18 U.S.C. 2241(a) or (b).
(B) The Act increased the statutory
maximum term of imprisonment for
convictions under 18 U.S.C. 2243(b) for
sexual abuse of a ward from five years
to 15 years. The proposed amendment
proposes to increase the base offense
level in § 2A3.3 (Criminal Sexual Abuse
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
4378
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
of a Ward or Attempt to Commit Such
Acts) to level [14][16][18][20].
(C) The Act created a new offense in
18 U.S.C. 2244(a)(5) for sexual contact
offenses that would have violated 18
U.S.C. 2241(c) had the sexual contact
been a sexual act. (Section 2241(c)
covers sexual acts with a child under 12
years old or sexual acts involving
conduct described in 18 U.S.C. 2241(a)
or (b) with a child between the ages of
12 and 16 and who is at least four years
younger than the defendant.) The
offense has a statutory maximum term
of imprisonment of life.
The proposed amendment addresses
this new offense by increasing the
minimum offense level in the age
enhancement in subsection
§ 2A3.4(b)(1) from level 20 to level 22.
Issue for Comment #4 in Part V of the
proposed amendment addresses
whether § 2A3.4 already adequately
accounts for the new offense and
therefore does not need to be amended.
(D) The Act amended 18 U.S.C. 1591
(sex trafficking of children or by force,
fraud, or coercion) to provide a
mandatory minimum term of
imprisonment of 15 years if the sex
trafficking offense involved a minor
who had not attained the age of 14 years
or involved force, fraud, or coercion
(subsection 1591(b)(1)) and a mandatory
minimum of 10 years if the offense
involved a minor who had attained the
age of 14 years but had not attained the
age of 18 years (subsection 1591(b)(2)).
The Act also increased the statutory
maximum term of imprisonment from
40 years to life for 18 U.S.C. 1591(b)(2)
offenses.
To address the increased statutory
minimums, the proposed amendment
modifies the base offense levels in
§§ 2G1.1 (Promoting a Commercial Sex
Act or Prohibited Sexual Conduct with
an Individual Other than a Minor) and
2G1.3 (Promoting a Commercial Sex Act
or Prohibited Sexual Conduct with a
Minor; Transportation of Minors to
Engage in a Commercial Sex Act or
Prohibited Sexual Conduct).
With respect to offenses involving
force, fraud, or coercion, the proposed
amendment would create a heightened
base offense level of [34][36] in § 2G1.1
if the offense of conviction is 18 U.S.C.
1591 and the offense involved conduct
described in subsection (b)(1) of that
statute. An alternative base offense level
of 14 would apply in all other cases.
The proposed amendment also excludes
application of the enhancement in
§ 2G1.1(b)(1) to cases that are sentenced
under § 2G1.1(a)(1) because cases to
which that base offense level apply
necessarily involve fraud or coercion.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
With respect to offenses involving
minors, the proposed amendment
would create alternative base offense
levels in § 2G1.3 based on the statute of
conviction and the conduct described in
that conviction. For convictions under
18 U.S.C. 1591 in which the offense
involved conduct described in
subsection (b)(1) of that statute (i.e.,
offense was effected by force, fraud, or
coercion, or involved a minor who had
not attained the age of 14 years), the
proposed base offense level is [34][36].
For convictions under 18 U.S.C. 1591 in
which the offense involved conduct
described in subsection (b)(2) of that
statute (i.e., offense involved a minor
who had attained the age of 14 but had
not attained the age of 18 years), the
proposed base offense level is [30][32].
The Act also increased the penalties
for 18 U.S.C. 2422(b) (Coercion and
enticement [of a minor to engage in
criminal sexual activity]) and 2423(a)
(Transportation [of a minor] with intent
to engage in criminal sexual activity).
Both statutes now have a mandatory
minimum term of 10 years (increased
from 5 years) and a statutory maximum
term of imprisonment of life (increased
from 30 years). The proposed
amendment would add § 2G1.3(a)(3)
with a base offense level of [28][30] if
the defendant was convicted under 18
U.S.C. 2422(b) or 2423(a). If the
Commission decides that the base
offense level should be the same for
offenses under 18 U.S.C. 1591(b)(2),
2422(b), and 2423(a), then the Team
would modify the proposed amendment
to consolidate these offenses into one
base offense level.
The proposed amendment also
provides a range of [4]–[8] at
§ 2G1.3(b)(5). It also addresses the
interaction of subsection (b)(5), which
provides an 8-level increase if the
offense involved a minor who had not
attained the age of 12 years, and the
proposed addition of alternative base
offense levels. Now that age is a factor
the court considers in determining the
appropriate base offense level for
convictions under 18 U.S.C. 1591, the
proposed amendment provides a new
application note that instructs the court
not to apply subsection (b)(5) if
subsection (a)(1) applies. The proposed
amendment also provides an option for
modifying the enhancement.
Issue for comment #8 asks whether
the Commission should consider
providing an increase of four or six
levels, instead of eight levels, at
§ 2G1.3(b)(5) in any case in which the
age of the minor victim is taken into
account by base offense level.
(E) The Act created a new offense in
18 U.S.C. 2257A that imposes
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
recordkeeping requirements on
individuals who produce depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct.
Failure to comply with the
recordkeeping requirements carries a
statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of 1 year. If the offense
was intended to conceal a child
pornography offense, the statute
provides a statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of 5 years for the first
offense; for the second offense, the
penalty is a 2-year mandatory minimum
and a statutory maximum of 10 years.
The proposed amendment references
this new offense to § 2G2.5
(Recordkeeping Offenses Involving the
Production of Sexually Explicit
Materials; Failure to Provide Required
Marks in Commercial Electronic Email).
Issue for Comment #5 in Part V of the
proposed amendment requests comment
regarding the refusal to allow inspection
of records in violation of 18 U.S.C.
2257(f)(5) or 2257A.
(F) The Act created a new offense in
18 U.S.C. 2252A(g) that prohibits
engaging in child exploitation
enterprises, defined in the statute as
violating 18 U.S.C. § 1591, 1201 (if the
victim is a minor), Chapter 109A
(involving a minor), Chapter 110 (except
for 18 U.S.C. 2257 and 2257A), or
Chapter 117 (involving a minor), as part
of a series of felony violations
constituting three or more separate
incidents and involving more than one
victim, and committing those offenses
in concert with three or more other
people. The statute provides a
mandatory minimum term of
imprisonment of 20 years.
The proposed amendment creates a
new guideline, § 2G2.6 (Child
Exploitation Enterprises), to cover this
new offense. The guideline provides a
base offense level of [34][35][36][37] and
three specific offense characteristics,
based on the age of the victim
(subsection (b)(1)), whether the
defendant was the parent or had some
other custodial care of the victim
(subsection (b)(2)), and whether the
offense involved conduct described in
18 U.S.C. 2241(a) or (b) (subsection
(b)(3)).
Issue for Comment #6 requests
comment regarding the base offense
level, the scope of the proposed specific
offense characteristics, and whether the
Commission should consider other
conduct for purposes of providing
additional specific offense
characteristics.
(G) The Act created a new offense in
18 U.S.C. 2252C that prohibits
knowingly embedding words or images
into the source code of a Web site with
the intent to deceive a person into
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
viewing obscenity, or to deceive a minor
into viewing material harmful to
minors. The statute carries a statutory
maximum term of imprisonment of 20
years if the offense involved a minor, or
a maximum of 10 years, otherwise.
Application Note 2 proposes that the
specific offense characteristic at
§ 2G3.1(b)(3) not apply for offenses
under 18 U.S.C. 2252C.
The proposed amendment modifies
subsection (b)(2) of § 2G3.1 (Importing,
Mailing, or Transporting Obscene
Matter; Transferring Obscene Matter to
a Minor; Misleading Domain Names),
which currently provides a two-level
enhancement if the offense involved
misleading domain names. The
proposed amendment adds to this
enhancement embedding words or
digital images on a Web site and also
presents the option of providing a fourlevel increase for this enhancement.
Issue for Comment #7 requests
comment regarding whether the
Commission should provide an
enhancement if the defendant intended
to deceive someone other than a minor
into viewing obscenity.
Part III addresses other criminal
provisions contained in the Act as
follows:
(A) The Act created a new Class A
misdemeanor in 42 U.S.C. 16984
prohibiting the use of a child’s
fingerprints that were derived from a
program funded by federal grants to
support voluntary fingerprinting of
children for any purpose other than
providing the fingerprints to the child’s
parents or guardian. The proposed
amendment references this new offense
to § 2H3.1.1 (Interception of
Communications; Eavesdropping;
Disclosure of Tax Return Information)
and provides a base offense level of 6 for
the offense. The heading of the
guideline also is amended to cover
personal information of this sort.
The Act also created 42 U.S.C. 16962
prohibiting the improper release of
information obtained in fingerprintbased checks for the background check
of foster or adoptive parents or of a
person employed by, or considering
employment with, a private or public
educational agency. The statute
provides a statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of 10 years. The proposed
amendment references this offense to
§ 2H3.1 and such offenses will receive a
base offense level of 9 under
§ 2H3.1(a)(1).
(B) The Act amended 18 U.S.C. 1001
to provide an enhanced penalty of up to
8 years if the matter relates to an offense
under 18 U.S.C. 1591 or Chapters 109A,
110, or 117 of title 18, United States
Code. The proposed amendment adds a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
[2]–[12] level enhancement in
subsection (b)(1)(C) of § 2J1.2
(Obstruction of Justice) to cover such
conduct.
(C) The Act added 18 U.S.C. 1591 to
the list in 18 U.S.C. 3559(e)(2) of
repeated sex offenses committed against
children that require a mandatory life
imprisonment. The proposed
amendment adds 18 U.S.C. 1591 to the
list of covered sex offenses in
Application Note 2 of § 4B1.5 (Repeat
and Dangerous Sex Offender Against
Minors).
Part IV addresses the probation and
supervised release aspects of the Act.
First, the proposed amendment updates
subsection (a)(9) of § 5B1.3 (Conditions
of Probation) and subsection (a)(7) of
§ 5D1.3 to include compliance with
SORNA as one of the mandatory
conditions. Second, it adds to the list of
‘‘special conditions’’ in §§ 5B1.3(d) and
5D1.3(d) a condition requiring a sex
offender to submit to a search, as added
to 18 U.S.C. 3563(b) and 3583(d) by the
Act. Third, the proposed amendment
modifies § 5D1.2 (Term of Supervised
Release) to add Chapter 109B and 18
U.S.C. 1201 and 1591 to the definition
of sex offense in Application Note 1 of
that guideline.
Part V sets forth all of the issues for
comment. In addition to the specific
issues noted in this synopsis, Issue for
Comment #1 requests input regarding
how the Commission should
incorporate the mandatory minimum
terms of imprisonment created or
increased by the Adam Walsh Act and
discusses four approaches for
incorporating these penalties.
Proposed Amendment
Part I—Implementing Directive
Regarding 18 U.S.C. § 2250 Offenses
Chapter Two, Part A, Subpart 3 is
amended in the heading by adding at
the end ‘‘AND OFFENSES RELATED
TO REGISTRATION AS A SEX
OFFENDER’’; and by adding at the end
the following new guidelines and
accompanying commentary:
‘‘§ 2A3.5.
Offender
Failure to Register as a Sex
Option 1:
[(a) Base Offense Level:
(1) 16, if the offense that gave rise to
the requirement to register was a Tier III
offense;
(2) 14, if the offense that gave rise to
the requirement to register was a Tier II
offense; or
(3) 12, if the offense that gave rise to
the requirement to register was a Tier I
offense.
(b) Specific Offense Characteristics:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4379
(1) If, while in a failure to register
status, the defendant (A)(i) committed a
sex offense against someone other than
a minor; or (ii) kidnapped or falsely
imprisoned a minor, increase by 6
levels; or (B) committed a sex offense
against a minor, increase by 8 levels. If
the offense level resulting from
application of subdivision (B) is less
than level [24]–[28], increase to level
[24]–[28].
(2) If the defendant voluntarily
attempted to correct the failure to
register, decrease by [2][4]levels.]
Option 2:
[(a) Base Offense Level: 12
(b) Specific Offense Characteristics
(1) If the offense that gave rise to the
requirement to register was a (A) Tier II
offense, increase by 2 levels; or (B) Tier
III offense, increase by 4 levels.
(2) If, while in a failure to register
status, the defendant (A)(i) committed a
sex offense against a person other than
a minor; or (ii) kidnapped or falsely
imprisoned a minor, increase by 6
levels; or (B) committed a sex offense
against a minor, increase by 8 levels. If
the offense level resulting from
application of subdivision (B) is less
than level [24]–[28], increase to level
[24]–[28].
(3) If the defendant voluntarily
attempted to correct the failure to
register, decrease by [2][4] levels.]
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 18 U.S.C. 2250(a).
Application Note:
1. Definitions.—For purposes of this
guideline:
‘Minor’ means (A) an individual who
had not attained the age of 18 years; (B)
an individual, whether fictitious or not,
who a law enforcement officer
represented to a participant (i) had not
attained the age of 18 years; and (ii)
could be provided for the purposes of
engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) an undercover law enforcement
officer who represented to a participant
that the officer had not attained the age
of 18 years.
‘Sex offense’ has the meaning given
that term in 42 U.S.C. § 16911(5), except
that kidnapping and false imprisonment
are not included.
[‘Tier I offense’,] ‘tier II offense’, and
‘tier III offense’ have the meaning given
those terms in 42 U.S.C. § 16911[(2)], (3)
and (4), respectively.
§ 2A3.6. Aggravated Offenses Relating to
Registration as a Sex Offender
(a) If the defendant was convicted
under 18 U.S.C. 2250(c) or § 2260A, the
guideline sentence is the term of
imprisonment required by statute.
Chapters Three (Adjustments) and Four
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
4380
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
(Criminal History and Criminal
Livelihood) shall not apply to that count
of conviction.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Commentary
Statutory Provisions: 18 U.S.C.
2250(c), 2260A.
Application Notes:
1. In General.—Sections 2250(c) and
2260A of title 18, United States Code,
provide mandatory minimum terms of
imprisonment that are required to be
imposed consecutively to other offenses.
Accordingly, the guideline sentence for
a defendant convicted under either
statute is the term required by the
statute.
2. Inapplicability of Chapters Three
and Four.—Do not apply Chapters Three
(Adjustments) and Four (Criminal
History and Criminal Livelihood) to any
offense sentenced under this guideline.
Such offenses are excluded from
application of those chapters because
the guideline sentence for each offense
is determined only by the relevant
statute. See §§ 3D1.1 (Procedure for
Determining Offense Level on Multiple
Counts) and 5G1.2 (Sentencing on
Multiple Counts of Conviction).’’
Part II—Implementing New Sex
Offenses and Increased Penalties
(A) New Mandatory Minimum for 18
U.S.C. 2241(c):
Section 2A3.1(a) is amended by
striking ‘‘30’’ and inserting the
following:
‘‘(1) 40, if the defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. 2241(c); or
(2) 30, otherwise.’’.
Section 2A3.1(b)(2) is amended by
striking ‘‘(A) If’’ and inserting ‘‘If
subsection (a)(2) applies and (A)’’; and
by striking ‘‘if’’ after ‘‘(B)’’.
The Commentary to § 2A3.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 2 by inserting ‘‘A. Definitions.—’’
before ‘‘For purposes of subsection
(b)(1),’’; and by adding at the end
following paragraph:
‘‘B. Application in Cases Involving a
Conviction under 18 U.S.C. 2241(c).—If
the conduct that forms the basis for a
conviction under 18 U.S.C. 2241(c) is
that the defendant engaged in conduct
described in 18 U.S.C. § 2241(a) or (b),
do not apply subsection (b)(1).’’.
The Commentary to § 2A3.1 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended in the first
paragraph in the third sentence by
inserting ‘‘in subsection (a)(2)’’ after
‘‘offense level’’; and in the second
paragraph in the second sentence by
inserting ‘‘, except when subsection
(b)(2) applies’’ after ‘‘twelve years of
age’’.
(B) Increased Statutory Maximum in
18 U.S.C. § 2423(b):
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Section 2A3.3(a) is amended by
striking ‘‘12’’ inserting
‘‘[12][14][16][18][20]’’.
The Commentary to § 2A3.3 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 1 by striking ‘‘Minor’’ through the
end of that sentence and inserting the
following:
‘‘‘Minor’ means (A) an individual who
had not attained the age of 18; (B) an
individual, whether fictitious or not,
who a law enforcement officer
represented to a participant (i) had not
attained the age of 18 years; and (ii)
could be provided for the purposes of
engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) an undercover law enforcement
officer who represented to a participant
that the officer had not attained the age
of 18 years.’’.
The Commentary to § 2A3.3 is
amended by striking the Background.
(C) New Offense in 18 U.S.C.
§ 2244(a)(5):
Section 2A3.4(b)(1) is amended by
striking ‘‘20’’ each place it appears and
inserting ‘‘22’’.
The Commentary to § 2A3.4 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
striking ‘‘(a)(1), (2), (3)’’.
(D) Increased Penalties (statutory
minimum and maximum) for 18 U.S.C.
§ 1591 Section 2G1.1(a) is amended by
striking ‘‘14’’ and inserting the
following:
‘‘(1) [34][36], if the offense of
conviction is 18 U.S.C. 1591 and the
offense involved conduct described in
subsection (b)(1) of that statute; or
(2) 14, otherwise.’’.
Section 2G1.1(b)(1) is amended by
inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(2) applies and’’
after ‘‘If’’.
The Commentary to § 2G1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 2 by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘Do not apply this enhancement if the
base offense level is determined under
subsection (a)(1) because subsection
(a)(1) necessarily involves fraud or
coercion.’’.
Section 2G1.3(a) is amended by
striking ‘‘24’’ and inserting:
‘‘(1) [34][36], if the defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 and
the offense involved conduct described
in subsection (b)(1) of that statute;
(2) [30][32], if the defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 1591 and
the offense involved conduct described
in subsection (b)(2) of that statute;
(3) [28][30], if the defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) or
§ 2423(a); or
(4) 24, otherwise.’’.
Section 2G1.3 is amended in
subsection (b)(5) by striking ‘‘8’’ and
inserting ‘‘[4][6][8]’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
The Commentary to § 2G1.3 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
striking ‘‘2422(b),’’.
The Commentary to § 2G1.3 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended by
redesignating Notes 5 through 7 as
Notes 6 through 8, respectively, and
inserting the following after Note 4:
‘‘5. Interaction of Subsections (a)(1)
and (b)(5).—If subsection (a)(1) applies,
do not apply subsection (b)(5).’’.
(E) New Recordkeeping Offense in 18
U.S.C. § 2257A:
The Commentary to § 2G2.5 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘§ ’’ before ‘‘2257’’; and by
inserting ‘‘, 2257A’’ after ‘‘2257’’.
(F) New Offense in § 2252A(g) for
Child Exploitation Enterprise Chapter
Two, Part G, Subpart Two is amended
by adding at the end the following new
guideline and accompanying
commentary:
‘‘§ 2G2.6. Child Exploitation Enterprises
(a) Base Offense Level:
[34][[35][36][37]
(b) Specific Offense Characteristics
(1) If a victim (A) had not attained the
age of 12 years, increase by 4 levels; or
(B) had attained the age of 12 years but
had not attained the age of 16 years,
increase by 2 levels.
(2) If (A) the defendant was a parent,
relative, or legal guardian of a minor
victim; or (B) a minor victim was
otherwise in the custody, care, or
supervisory control of the defendant,
increase by 2 levels.
(3) If the offense involved conduct
described in 18 U.S.C. 2241(a) or (b),
increase by 2 levels.
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 18 U.S.C.
2252A(g).
Application Notes:
1. Application of Subsection (b)(2).—
(A) Custody, Care, or Supervisory
Control.—Subsection (b)(2) is intended
to have broad application and includes
offenses involving a victim less than 18
years of age entrusted to the defendant,
whether temporarily or permanently.
For example, teachers, day care
providers, baby-sitters, or other
temporary caretakers are among those
who would be subject to this
enhancement. In determining whether
to apply this enhancement, the court
should look to the actual relationship
that existed between the defendant and
the minor and not simply to the legal
status of the defendant-minor
relationship.
(B) Inapplicability of Chapter Three
Adjustment.—If the enhancement under
subsection (b)(1) applies, do not apply
§ 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust or
Use of Special Skill).
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
2. Application of Subsection (b)(3).—
For purposes of subsection (b)(3),
‘conduct described in 18 U.S.C.
§ 2241(a) or (b)’ is: (i) Using force
against the minor; (ii) threatening or
placing the minor in fear that any
person will be subject to death, serious
bodily injury, or kidnapping; (iii)
rendering the minor unconscious; or (iv)
administering by force or threat of force,
or without the knowledge or permission
of the minor, a drug, intoxicant, or other
similar substance and thereby
substantially impairing the ability of the
minor to appraise or control conduct.
This provision would apply, for
example, if any dangerous weapon was
used or brandished, or in a case in
which the ability of the minor to
appraise or control conduct was
substantially impaired by drugs or
alcohol.
3. Definition of Minor.—‘Minor’
means (A) an individual who had not
attained the age of 18 years; (B) an
individual, whether fictitious or not,
who a law enforcement officer
represented to a participant (i) had not
attained the age of 18 years; and (ii)
could be provided for the purposes of
engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) an undercover law enforcement
officer who represented to a participant
that the officer had not attained the age
of 18 years.’’
(G) New Offense in 18 U.S.C. 2252C
for Embedding Words or Images
Section 2G3.1 is amended by striking
subsection (b)(2) and inserting the
following:
‘‘(2) If, with the intent to deceive a
minor into viewing material that is
harmful to minors, the offense involved
the use of (A) a misleading domain
name on the Internet; or (B) embedded
words or digital images in the
sourcecode of a Web site, increase by
[2][4] levels.’’.
The Commentary to § 2G3.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘, 2252C’’ after ‘‘2252B’’.
The Commentary to § 2G3.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 2 by inserting ‘‘or § 2252C’’ after
‘‘§ 2252B’’.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. 2245 the
following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 2250(a)—2A3.5
18 U.S.C. 2250(c)—2A3.6’’;
by inserting after the line referenced to
18 U.S.C. 2252B the following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 2252C—2G3.1’’;
by inserting after the line referenced to
18 U.S.C. 2257 the following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 2257A—2G2.5’’;
and by inserting after the line referenced
to 18 U.S.C. 2260(b) the following:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
‘‘18 U.S.C. 2260A—2A3.6’’.
Part III—Other Criminal Provisions
(A) New Offenses in 42 U.S.C. 16962
and 16984 Relating to Fingerprints:
Section 2H3.1 is amended in the
heading by striking ‘‘Tax Return
Information’’ and inserting ‘‘Certain
Personal Information’’.
Section 2H3.1(a)(2) is amended in by
striking ‘‘or 26 U.S.C. 7216’’ and
inserting ‘‘, § 7216, or 42 U.S.C.
§ 16984’’.
The Commentary to § 2H3.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘42 U.S.C. 16962, 16984;’’
after ‘‘7216;’’.
The Commentary to § 2H3.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended by
striking ‘‘Notes’’ and inserting ‘‘Note’’;
by striking Note 1; and by redesignating
Note 2 as Note 1.
(B) Increased Penalty in 18 U.S.C.
1001:
Section 2J1.2(b)(1)(B) is amended by
inserting ‘‘the’’ after ‘‘If’’; and by
striking ‘‘the’’ after ‘‘(ii)’’.
Section 2J1.2(b)(1) is amended by
adding at the end the following:
‘‘(C) If the (i) defendant was convicted
under 18 U.S.C. 1001; and (ii) statutory
maximum term of imprisonment
relating to sex offenses under 18 U.S.C.
§ 1591 or chapters 109A, 109B, 110, or
117 of title 18, United States Code, is
applicable, increase by [2]–[12] levels.’’.
The Commentary to § 2J1.2 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
striking:
‘‘when the statutory maximum term of
imprisonment relating to international
terrorism or domestic terrorism is
applicable’’, and inserting: ‘‘(when the
statutory maximum term of
imprisonment relating to international
terrorism, domestic terrorism, or sex
offenses under 18 U.S.C. 1591 or
chapters 109A, 109B, 110, or 117 of title
18, United States Code, is applicable)’’.
(D) 18 U.S.C. 1591 Added to List of
Covered Sex Offenses:
The Commentary to § 4B1.5 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended by
striking Note 1 and inserting the
following:
‘‘1. Definition.—For purposes of this
guideline, ‘minor’ means (A) an
individual who had not attained the age
of 18 years; (B) an individual, whether
fictitious or not, who a law enforcement
officer represented to a participant (i)
had not attained the age of 18 years; and
(ii) could be provided for the purposes
of engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
or (C) an undercover law enforcement
officer who represented to a participant
that the officer had not attained the age
of 18 years.’’.
The Commentary to § 4B1.5 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4381
Note 2 by inserting ‘‘or (iv) 18 U.S.C.
§ 1591;’’ after ‘‘alien individual;’’; and
by striking ‘‘through (iii)’’ and inserting
‘‘through (iv)’’.
The Commentary to § 4B1.5 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended by striking
the first and second sentences and
inserting the following:
‘‘This guideline applies to offenders
whose instant offense of conviction is a
sex offense committed against a minor
and who present a continuing danger to
the public.’’
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended in the line referenced to 18
U.S.C. 1001 by striking: ‘‘when the
statutory maximum term of
imprisonment relating to international
terrorism or domestic terrorism is
applicable’’, and inserting: ‘‘(when the
statutory maximum term of
imprisonment relating to international
terrorism, domestic terrorism, or sex
offenses under 18 U.S.C. 1591 or
chapters 109A, 109B, 110, or 117 of title
18, United States Code, is applicable)’’;
and by inserting after the line referenced
to 42 U.S.C. 14905 the following:
‘‘42 U.S.C. 16962—2H3.1
42 U.S.C. 16984—2H3.1’’.
Part IV—Provisions Regarding Probation
and Supervised Release
Section 5B1.3(a)(9) is amended by
striking ‘‘a defendant’’ and all that
follows through the end of ‘‘student;’’
and inserting the following:
‘‘a sex offender shall comply with the
requirements of the Sex Offender
Registration and Notification Act (42
U.S.C. 16913) by (A) registering, and
keeping such registration current, where
the offender resides, where the offender
is an employee, and where the offender
is a student, and for the initial
registration, a sex offender also shall
register in the jurisdiction in which
convicted if such jurisdiction is
different from the jurisdiction of
residence; (B) providing information
required by 42 U.S.C. 16914; and (C)
keeping such registration current for the
full registration period as set forth in 42
U.S.C. 16915;’’.
Section 5B1.3(d)(7) is amended by
adding at the end the following:
‘‘(C) A condition requiring the
defendant to submit to a search, at any
time, with or without a warrant, and by
any law enforcement or probation
officer, of the defendant’s person and
any property, house, residence, vehicle,
papers, computer, other electronic
communication or data storage devices
or media, and effects, upon reasonable
suspicion concerning a violation of a
condition of probation or unlawful
conduct by the defendant, or by any
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
4382
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
probation officer in the lawful discharge
of the officer’s supervision functions.’’.
The Commentary to § 5D1.2 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended by
striking Note 1 and inserting the
following:
‘‘1. Definitions.—For purposes of this
guideline:
‘Sex offense’ means (A) an offense,
perpetrated against a minor, under (i)
chapter 109A of title 18, United States
Code; (ii) chapter 109B of such title; (iii)
chapter 110 of such title, not including
a recordkeeping offense; (iv) chapter 117
of such title, not including transmitting
information about a minor or filing a
factual statement about an alien
individual; (v) an offense under 18
U.S.C. 1201; or (vi) an offense under 18
U.S.C. 1591; or (B) an attempt or a
conspiracy to commit any offense
described in subdivisions (A)(i) through
(vi) of this note.
‘Minor’ means (A) an individual who
had not attained the age of 18 years; (B)
an individual, whether fictitious or not,
who a law enforcement officer
represented to a participant (i) had not
attained the age of 18 years; and (ii)
could be provided for the purposes of
engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(C) an undercover law enforcement
officer who represented to a participant
that the officer had not attained the age
of 18 years.’’.
Section 5D1.3(a)(7) is amended by
striking ‘‘a defendant’’ and all that
follows through the end of ‘‘student;’’
and inserting the following:
‘‘a sex offender shall comply with the
requirements of the Sex Offender
Registration and Notification Act (42
U.S.C. 16913) by (A) registering, and
keeping such registration current, where
the offender resides, where the offender
is an employee, and where the offender
is a student, and for the initial
registration, a sex offender also shall
register in the jurisdiction in which
convicted if such jurisdiction is
different from the jurisdiction of
residence; (B) providing information
required by 42 U.S.C. 16914; and (C)
keeping such registration current for the
full registration period as set forth in 42
U.S.C. 16915;’’.
Section 5D1.3(d)(7) is amended by
adding at the end the following:
‘‘(C) A condition requiring the
defendant to submit to a search, at any
time, with or without a warrant, and by
any law enforcement or probation
officer, of the defendant’s person and
any property, house, residence, vehicle,
papers, computer, other electronic
communication or data storage devices
or media, and effects upon reasonable
suspicion concerning a violation of a
condition of supervised release or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
unlawful conduct by the defendant, or
by any probation officer in the lawful
discharge of the officer’s supervision
functions.’’.
Part V—Issues for Comment:
1. The Commission requests comment
regarding how it should incorporate the
mandatory minimum terms of
imprisonment created or increased by
the Adam Walsh Child Protection Act of
2006. There are four potential
approaches to consider. First, the
Commission can set the base offense
level to correspond to the first offense
level on the sentencing table with a
guideline range in excess of the
mandatory minimum. Historically, this
is the approach the Commission has
taken with respect to drug offenses. For
example, a 10-year mandatory minimum
would correspond to a base offense level
of 32 (121–151 months). Second, the
Commission can set the base offense
level such that the guideline range is the
first on the sentencing table to include
the mandatory minimum term of
imprisonment at any point within the
range. Under this approach, a 10-year
mandatory minimum would correspond
to a base offense level of 31 (108–135
months). Third, the Commission could
set the base offense level such that the
corresponding guideline range is lower
than the mandatory minimum term of
imprisonment but then anticipate that
certain frequently applied specific
offense characteristics would increase
the offense level and corresponding
guideline range to encompass the
mandatory minimum. The Commission
took this approach in 2004 when it
implemented the PROTECT Act. Fourth,
the Commission could decide not to
change the base offense levels and allow
§ 5G1.1(b) to operate. Section 5G1.1(b)
provides that if a mandatory minimum
term of imprisonment is greater than the
maximum of the applicable guideline
range, the statutorily required minimum
sentence shall be the guideline
sentence.
2. Pursuant to the directive in section
141 of the Act, the Commission must
consider, ‘‘whether the person
committed an offense against a minor in
connection with, or during, the period
for which the person failed to register.’’
In light of this consideration, the
Commission requests comment
regarding the scope of the proposed
enhancement in § 2A3.5(b)(1) of Option
1 and § 2A3.5(b)(2) of Option 2 with
respect to minors. Should the
Commission expand the proposed sixlevel enhancement so that it would
apply in the case of any non-sexual
offense committed against a minor? As
an alternative to providing tiered
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
enhancements based on the type of
offense committed against a minor (as
presented in the proposed amendment),
should the Commission structure the
enhancement so that any offense
committed against a minor would
warrant an eight-level enhancement and
any offense committed against a person
other than a minor would warrant a sixlevel enhancement? If so, should the
enhancement also provide a minimum
offense level of [24]–[28]?
3. The proposed amendment provides
in § 2A3.5 a [2][4]-level reduction if the
defendant voluntarily attempted to
correct the failure to register. The
Commission requests comment
regarding this reduction. Specifically,
how should the Commission address
circumstances in which it was
impossible for the defendant to register,
for example, the defendant had a
debilitating illness or severe mental
impairment, or the jurisdiction in which
the defendant works or is a student does
not allow non-residents to register.
Should the proposed reduction be
extended to such circumstances or is
there an alternative way in which the
Commission should take such
circumstances into account in the
guidelines?
The Commission also requests
comment regarding whether it should
provide an instruction that the
reduction does not apply if any of the
proposed specific offense characteristics
also apply.
4. The Adam Walsh Child Protection
Act created a new offense at 18 U.S.C.
2244(a)(5), with a statutory maximum
term of imprisonment of life, for sexual
contact that would have violated 18
U.S.C. 2241(c) (Aggravated sexual abuse
with children) had the sexual contact
been a sexual act. The proposed
amendment addresses this new offense
in § 2A3.4 (Abusive Sexual Contact or
Attempt to Commit Abusive Sexual
Contact) by increasing the minimum
offense level in subsection (b)(1) (if the
victim was under the age of 12 years)
from level 20 to level 22. The
Commission requests comment
regarding whether it should amend
§ 2A3.4 to account specifically for this
new offense or whether the current
provisions of the guideline are adequate
to account for this new offense.
5. The proposed amendment
references 18 U.S.C. 2257A (Record
keeping requirements) to § 2G2.5
(Recordkeeping Offenses Involving the
Production of Sexually Explicit
Materials; Failure to Provide Required
Marks in Commercial Electronic Email).
For offenses in which the defendant
refused to allow an inspection of
records in violation of 18 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
2257(f)(5) or § 2257A, the Commission
requests comment regarding whether it
should provide an application note that
provides for an upward departure in
such cases or instructs the court to
apply § 3C1.1.
6. The Commission requests comment
regarding the proposed new guideline in
§ 2G2.6 that would implement 18 U.S.C.
2252A(g). Specifically, the Commission
requests comment regarding the
appropriate base offense level for this
new guideline given that the statute
provides a mandatory minimum term of
imprisonment of 20 years. Additionally,
the proposed specific offense
characteristics are targeted to offense
conduct involving minors. Section 1591
is included as one of the predicate
offenses under 18 U.S.C. 2252A(g) but it
is not limited to offenses committed
against minors. The Commission
requests comment regarding whether it
should provide a specific offense
characteristic, or expand a proposed
specific offense characteristic, to cover
all 18 U.S.C. 1591 offenses. With respect
to enhancements, is there additional
conduct for which the Commission
should consider providing specific
offense characteristics? If so, for what
conduct, and what is an appropriate
increase for that conduct? The
Commission further requests comment
regarding whether this guideline should
provide a decrease if the defendant’s
conduct was limited to possession or
receipt of material involving the sexual
exploitation of a minor and the
defendant did not intend to traffic in or
distribute such material.
The Commission also requests
comment regarding whether it should
provide an enhancement for the use of
a computer or interactive an interactive
computer service and if so, what would
be an appropriate increase for such
conduct. The Commission specifically
asks whether this enhancement is
appropriate if the base offense level is
at the lower end of the proposed
options.
7. The proposed amendment adds to
the misleading domain name
enhancement in subsection (b)(5) of
§ 2G3.1 the use of embedded words or
digital images in the source code of a
Web site to deceive a minor into
viewing matter that would be harmful to
the minor. The Commission requests
comment regarding whether it also
should include an enhancement if the
offense involved the use of embedded
words or digital images to deceive a
person other than a minor into viewing
obscenity. If so, how many levels would
be appropriate for such an
enhancement? For example, should the
Commission provide two levels for such
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
an enhancement and four levels if the
offense deceived a minor into viewing
harmful matter?
8. The Commission requests comment
regarding the interaction of the age
enhancement in § 2G1.3(b)(5) and the
proposed base offense levels. The
proposed amendment presents options
for reducing the age enhancement in
§ 2G1.3(b)(5) to as far as four levels.
Should the Commission consider
providing an increase of less than eight
levels in any case in which the age of
the minor victim is taken into account
by the base offense level (because age is
an element of the offense)? For example,
should four levels be applied if the base
offense level takes into account the age
of the minor and eight levels be applied
if the base offense level does not take
age into account?
9. The Commission requests comment
regarding the interaction of § 2G1.3 and
§ 2A3.1, particularly with respect to the
application of the cross reference in
§ 2G1.3(c)(3) and the proportionality of
resulting offenses levels for a case
involving a minor who had not attained
the age 12 years. Do any of the proposed
offense levels in either guideline need to
be increased in order to provide
proportionality between §§ 2G1.3 and
2A1.3 in cases involving a minor who
had not attained the age of 12 years,
taking into account the new mandatory
minimum penalties provided for
offenses referenced to these two
guidelines? For example, the proposed
amendment provides a base offense
level of [28][30] if the defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. 2422(b) or
§ 2423(a). If § 2G1.3(c)(3) applies
because, for example, the offense
involved interstate travel with a minor
who had not attained the age of 12
years, the court would apply § 2A3.1
and the resulting offense level under
that guideline would be 34 (BOL of 30
plus 4 levels for age of minor). If the
court does not apply the cross reference
and stays in § 2G1.3, the resulting
offense level would be [36][38] (BOL of
[28][30] plus 8 levels for the age of the
minor). Are these offense levels
appropriate given new mandatory
minimum penalties and offense levels
currently provided in § 2G1.3 and
§ 2A3.1, respectively, or should the
Commission provide higher base offense
levels in § 2G1.3?
3. Technical and Clarifying
Amendments to the Sentencing
Guidelines
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment:
This proposed amendment makes
various technical and conforming
changes to the guidelines.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4383
Specifically, Part A of the proposed
amendment corrects typographical
errors in §§ 2B1.1(b)(13)(C), 2D1.11(a),
2K2.1 (Application Note 14), and
2L1.1(b)(1). The proposed amendment
also updates Appendix A by eliminating
an outdated statutory reference and by
including a statutory reference for 18
U.S.C. 931 to 2K2.6 (Possessing,
Purchasing, or Owning Body Armor by
Violent Felons).
In Part B, the proposed amendment
addresses application of the grouping
rules when a defendant is sentenced on
multiple counts contained in different
indictments as, for example, when a
case is transferred to another district for
purposes of sentencing, pursuant to Fed.
R. Crim.P. 20(a). Section 3D1.1
(Procedure for Determining Offense
Level on Multiple Counts) is silent as to
this issue. The four circuits that have
addressed the issue have concluded that
the grouping rules apply when a
defendant is sentenced on multiple
indictments. See United States v.
Hernandez Coplin, 24 F.3d 312 (1st Cir.
1994) (holding that § 5G1.2’s rules
regarding sentences imposed at the
same time for different indictments
must apply to Chapter 3, Part D); United
States v. Herula, 464 F.3d 1132 (10th
Cir. 2006) (holding that § 5G1.2 required
that § 3D1.4 apply in cases involving
multiple counts in separate
indictments); United States v. Tolbert,
306 F.3d 244 (5th Cir. 2002) (holding
that § 5G1.2 requires that total
punishment be determined by the
grouping principles from Chapter 3, Part
D, thus requiring grouping for counts
contained in different indictments). See
also United States v. Greer, 91 F.3d 996
(7th Cir. 1996) (holding that the district
court had erred by not using § 5G1.2 to
sentence the defendant, who was
sentenced for two separate crimes
within minutes of each other).
The proposed amendment adopts the
reasoning of these cases and clarifies
that the grouping rules apply not only
to multiple counts in the same
indictment but also to multiple counts
contained in different indictments when
a defendant is sentenced on the
indictments simultaneously. The
proposed amendment provides
clarifying language in the Introductory
Commentary of Chapter Three, Part D,
as well as in § 3D1.1. The proposed
language is the same language that
currently is provided in *5G1.2
(Sentencing on Multiple Counts of
Conviction) and relied on by the courts
cited in the previous paragraph.
Proposed Amendment
Part A:
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
4384
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
Section 2B1.1(b)(13)(C) is amended by
striking ‘‘(12)’’ and inserting ‘‘(13)’’.
Section 2D1.11(a) is amended by
striking ‘‘(e)’’ and inserting ‘‘(d)’’.
The Commentary to § 2K2.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 14 in subdivision (B) by striking
‘‘(b)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b)(6)’’.
Section 2L1.1(b)(1)(B) is amended by
striking ‘‘(2)’’ and inserting ‘‘(3)’’.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. 930 the
following new line:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 931–2K2.6’’;
and by striking the following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 3174–2J1.7’’.
Part B:
Chapter 3, Part D is amended in the
Introductory Commentary in the first
paragraph by inserting ‘‘These rules
apply to multiple counts of conviction
(1) contained in the same indictment or
information, or (2) contained in
different indictments or informations for
which sentences are to be imposed at
the same time or in a consolidated
proceeding.’’ after ‘‘is convicted.’’.
The Commentary to § 3D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Note’’ is amended by
striking ‘‘Note’’ and inserting ‘‘Notes’’;
by redesignating Note 1 as Note 2; and
by inserting the following as new Note
1:
‘‘1. In General.—For purposes of
sentencing multiple counts of
conviction, counts can be (A) contained
in the same indictment or information;
(B) contained in different indictments or
informations for which sentences are to
be imposed at the same time or
contained in a consolidated
proceeding.’’.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
4. Miscellaneous Laws
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment:
This is a two-part amendment that
implements recently enacted legislation.
Part One of this proposed amendment
operates to support the Respect for
America’s Fallen Heroes Act, Public
Law 109–228, which created a new
offense in 38 U.S.C. 2413, prohibiting
certain demonstrations at Arlington
National Cemetery and at cemeteries
under control of the National Cemetery
Administration. The penalty for a
violation of 38 U.S.C. 2413 is
imprisonment of not more than one
year, a fine, or both.
The proposed amendment references
this new crime to § 2B2.3, because the
new crime shares with other crimes that
are referred to the trespass guideline the
basic element of unauthorized access to
particular federal land or site. The
proposed amendment expands the twolevel enhancement in § 2B2.3(b)(1) to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
include Arlington National Cemetery or
a cemetery under the control of the
National Cemetery Association.
(Arlington National Cemetery is, of
course, considered a national cemetery,
but it is not maintained by the National
Cemetery Administration. Rather, it is
maintained by the Department of the
Army and should be named separately
in the Guidelines.).
Part Two of this proposed amendment
operates to support the Violence Against
Women and Department of Justice
Reauthorization Act of 2005 (VAWA),
Public Law 109–162. VAWA includes
the International Marriage Broker
Regulation Act of 2005 (IMBRA), which
requires marriage brokers to collect
background information about United
States clients and places limitations on
the marriage brokers’ sharing of
information about foreign national
clients. A violation of 8 U.S.C.
1375a(d)(3)(C) is subject to a
misdemeanor conviction with a base
offense level of 6. The felony offenses
covered under 8 U.S.C. § 1375a(d)(5)(B)
will receive a base offense level of 9.
The proposed amendment refers the
new offense to § 2H3.1 (Interception of
Communications; Eavesdropping;
Disclosure of Tax Return Information)
and expands the heading of the
guideline to include the unauthorized
disclosure of private information.
Currently, the guideline covers the
wrongful disclosure of certain tax
information. In addition to expanding
the guideline to cover IMBRA offenses,
the Commission also may wish to
consider referencing other similar
privacy statutes to this guideline, such
as 18 U.S.C. 1905 (Disclosure of
confidential information generally (by
an officer or employee of the U.S.)), 42
U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I)–(IV)
(pertaining to the unauthorized willful
disclosure of social security account
numbers and related information), and
42 U.S.C. 1320d(6) (wrongful disclosure
of individually identifiable heath
information), which currently are not
included in Appendix A. The proposed
amendment brackets language that
would include the wrongful disclosure
of confidential information covered by
these additional statutes.
Following the proposed amendment
is an issue for comment regarding
implementation of 31 U.S.C. 5363,
which prohibits the acceptance of any
financial instrument for unlawful
Internet gambling. The offense was
created by the Safety and Accountability
for Every Port Act (SAFE Port Act),
Public Law 109–347.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Proposed Amendment
I. Respect for America’s Fallen Heroes
Act (Pub. L. 109–228)
Section 2B2.3(b)(1) is amended by
redesignating subdivision (F) as
subdivision (G); and by inserting ‘‘(F) at
Arlington National Cemetery or a
cemetery under the control of the
National Cemetery Administration;’’
after ‘‘residence;’’.
The Commentary to § 2B2.3 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘38 U.S.C. 2413;’’ after
‘‘1036;’’.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 38 U.S.C. 787 the
following new line:
‘‘38 U.S.C. 2413—2B2.3’’.
II. Violence Against Women and
Department of Justice Reauthorization
Act of 2005 (Pub. L. 109–162)
Section 2H3.1 is amended in the
heading by striking ‘‘Tax Return
Information’’ and inserting ‘‘Certain
Personal Information’’.
Section 2H3.1(a)(2) is amended by
inserting ‘‘8 U.S.C. 1375(d)(3)(C); 18
U.S.C. 1905;’’ after ‘‘convicted of’’; and
inserting ‘‘[; 42 U.S.C.
405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I)–(IV); or 42 U.S.C.
1320d–6]’’ after ‘‘7216’’.
The Commentary to § 2H3.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘8 U.S.C. 1375(d)(3)(C),
(d)(5)(B);’’ before ‘‘18 U.S.C.’’; by
inserting ‘‘§ 1905,’’ before ‘‘2511’’; and
by inserting ‘‘[42 U.S.C.
405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I)–(IV); 42 U.S.C.
1320d–6;]’’ after ‘‘7216;’’.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 8 U.S.C. 1328 the
following new line:
‘‘8 U.S.C. 1375a—2H3.1’’;
by inserting after the line referenced to
42 U.S.C. 300i–l the following new
line:
‘‘[42 U.S.C. 405(c)(2)(C)(viii)(I)–(IV)—
2H3.1’’]; and
by inserting after the line referenced to
42 U.S.C. 1320a–7b the following new
line:
‘‘[42 U.S.C. 1320d–6—2H3.1]’’.
Issue for Comment:
The SAFE Port Act, Pub. L. 109–347,
created a new offense in 31 U.S.C. 5363,
prohibiting the acceptance of any
financial instrument for unlawful
Internet gambling Section 5366 of title
31, United States Code, and providing a
statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of not more than 5 years.
The Commission requests comment
regarding how it should implement the
new offense. Specifically, should the
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
offense be referenced to § 2E3.1
(Gambling Offenses), which provides a
base offense level of 6 or, alternatively,
a base offense level of 12, if the offense
was (A) engaging in a gambling
business; (B) transmission of wagering
information; or (C) committed as part of,
or to facilitate, a commercial gambling
operation. If the Commission should
reference this statute to § 2E3.1, are
there additional amendments that
should be made to this guideline in
order to implement fully the new
offense? For example, should the
Commission provide a cross reference to
either § 2S1.1 (Laundering of Monetary
Instruments) or § 2S1.3 (Structuring
Transactions to Evade Reporting
Requirements) if the offense involves
conduct more adequately covered by
either of those guidelines? Alternatively,
should 31 U.S.C. 5363 be referenced to
either § 2S1.1 or § 2S1.3 instead of
§ 2E3.1, and if so, what other
modifications, if any, should be made in
those guidelines to implement fully the
new offense?
5. Re-Promulgation of Emergency
Intellectual Property Amendment
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment:
This proposed amendment repromulgates the emergency amendment,
effective September 12, 2006, that
responded to the directive contained in
section 1(c) of the Stop Counterfeiting in
Manufactured Goods Act, Pub. L. 109–
181. The directive, which required the
Commission to promulgate an
amendment under emergency
amendment authority by September 12,
2006, instructs the Commission to
‘‘review, and if appropriate, amend the
Federal sentencing guidelines and
policy statements applicable to persons
convicted of any offense under section
2318 or 2320 of title 18, United States
Code.’’ The directive further provides
that the Commission shall: Determine
whether the definition of ‘‘infringement
amount’’ set forth in application note 2
of section 2B5.3 of the Federal
sentencing guidelines is adequate to
address situations in which the
defendant has been convicted of one of
the offenses [under section 2318 or 2320
of title 18, United States Code] and the
item in which the defendant trafficked
was not an infringing item but rather
was intended to facilitate infringement,
such as an anti-circumvention device, or
the item in which the defendant
trafficked was infringing and also was
intended to facilitate infringement in
another good or service, such as a
counterfeit label, documentation, or
packaging, taking into account cases
such as U.S. v. Sung, 87 F.3d 194 (7th
Cir. 1996).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
The emergency amendment added
subdivision (vii) to Application Note
2(A) of § 2B5.3 (Criminal Infringement
of Copyright or Trademark) to provide
that the infringement amount is based
on the retail value of the infringed item
in a case under 18 U.S.C. 2318 or 2320
that involves a counterfeit label, patch,
sticker, wrapper, badge, emblem,
medallion, charm, box, container, can,
case, hangtag, documentation, or
packaging of any type or nature (I) that
has not been affixed to, or does not
enclose or accompany a good or service;
and (II) which, had it been so used,
would appear to a reasonably informed
purchaser to be affixed to, enclosing or
accompanying an identifiable, genuine
good or service. In such a case, the
‘‘infringed item’’ is the identifiable,
genuine good or service. This proposed
amendment would re-promulgate this
application note as a permanent
amendment to § 2B5.3.
The emergency amendment did not
address the portion of the directive
pertaining to anti-circumvention
devices. This proposed amendment
addresses that portion of the directive in
two ways. First, the proposed
amendment presents two options for
addressing the trafficking in devices that
circumvent a technological measure.
Option One expands the specific offense
characteristic in § 2B5.3(b)(3) to include
convictions under 17 U.S.C. 1201(b) for
trafficking in devices that circumvent a
technological measure. Currently,
§ 2B5.3(b)(3) provides a two-level
enhancement and a minimum offense
level of 12 for cases involving the
manufacture, importation, or uploading
of infringing items. The purpose of the
enhancement in § 2B5.3(b)(3) is to
provide greater punishment for
defendants who put infringing items
into the stream of commerce, thereby
enabling other individuals to infringe
the copyright or trademark. See App. C
(Amendment 594, effective Nov. 1,
2000). A defendant who traffics in
devices that circumvent a technological
measure similarly enables others to
infringe a copyright and arguably
warrants greater punishment. The
minimum offense level guarantees the
defendant will be in Zone D of the
Sentencing Table. Under this option, the
minimum offense level also works as a
proxy for the infringement amount.
Options Two and Three address
trafficking in devices used to
circumvent a technological measure by
providing a special rule under
Application Note 1 for determining the
infringement amount. Option Two adds
trafficking cases to the note pertaining
to the retail value of the infringing item.
Under this option, the court would use
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4385
the retail value of the device (the
‘‘infringing item’’) multiplied by the
number of devices involved in the
offense. Option Three is similar but
provides two alternative measures
under a new Application Note 1(C). It
instructs the court to determine the
infringement amount by using the
greater of two calculations: (i) The retail
value of the device multiplied by the
number of such devices; and (ii) the
number of such devices multiplied by
the price a person legitimately using the
device to access or make use of a
copyrighted work would have paid.
All options use the statutory
definition of ‘‘circumvent a
technological measure’’ found in 17
U.S.C. 1201(a)(3)(A), which is ‘‘to
descramble a scrambled work, to
decrypt an encrypted work, or otherwise
to avoid, bypass, remove, deactivate, or
impair a technological measure, without
the authority of the copyright owner.’’
Second, the proposed amendment
adds an application note regarding the
determination of the infringement
amount in cases under 17 U.S.C. 1201
and 1204 in which the defendant
circumvented a technological measure.
In such an offense, the ‘‘retail value of
the infringed item’’ is the price the user
would have paid to access lawfully the
copyrighted work, and the ‘‘infringed
item’’ is the accessed work.
Two issues for comment follow the
proposed amendment. The first issue is
regarding whether the Commission
should amend § 2B5.3 to provide a
downward departure for cases in which
the infringement amount overstates the
seriousness of the offense. The second
issue is regarding the interaction
between the proposed provisions on
circumventing a technological measure
and application of § 3B1.3 (Abuse of
Position of Trust or Use of Special
Skill).
Proposed Amendment
[Option 1:
Section 2B5.3 is amended by striking
subsection (b)(3) and inserting the
following:
‘‘(3) If the (A) offense involved the
manufacture, importation, or uploading
of infringing items; or (B) defendant was
convicted under 17 U.S.C. 1201(b) and
1204 for trafficking in devices used to
circumvent a technological measure,
increase by 2 levels. If the resulting
offense level is less than level 12,
increase to level 12.’’.]
The Commentary to § 2B5.3 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘, 1201, 1204’’ after ‘‘506(a)’’.
The Commentary to § 2B5.3 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 1 by inserting after ‘‘Definitions.—
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
4386
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
For purposes of this guideline:’’ the
following:
‘‘ ‘Circumvent a technological
measure’ has the meaning given that
term in 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(3)(A).’’.
The Commentary to § 2B5.3 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 2(A) by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘(vii) A case under 18 U.S.C. 2318 or
2320 that involves a counterfeit label,
patch, sticker, wrapper, badge, emblem,
medallion, charm, box, container, can,
case, hangtag, documentation, or
packaging of any type or nature (I) that
has not been affixed to, or does not
enclose or accompany a good or service;
and (II) which, had it been so used,
would appear to a reasonably informed
purchaser to be affixed to, enclosing or
accompanying an identifiable, genuine
good or service. In such a case, the
‘infringed item’ is the identifiable,
genuine good or service.
(viii) A case under 17 U.S.C. 1201 and
1204 in which the defendant
circumvented a technological measure.
In such an offense, the ‘retail value of
the infringed item’ is the price the user
would have paid to access lawfully the
copyrighted work, and the ‘infringed
item’ is the accessed work.’’.
[Option 2:
The Commentary to § 2B5.3 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 2 in subdivision (B) by adding at
the end the following:
‘‘This note also applies in a case
involving the trafficking of devices used
to circumvent a technological measure
in violation of 17 U.S.C. 1201 and 1204.
In such a case the ‘infringing item’ is the
device.’’.]
[Option 3:
The Commentary to § 2B5.3 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 2 by redesignating subdivisions (C)
through (E) as subdivisions (D) through
(F), respectively; and by inserting after
subdivision (B) the following:
‘‘(C) Determination of Infringement
Amount in Cases Involving Trafficking
in Devices Used to Circumvent a
Technological Measure.—In a case in
which the defendant is convicted under
17 U.S.C. §§ 1201(b) and 1204 for
trafficking in a device used to
circumvent a technological measure, the
infringement amount is the greater of
the following:
(i) The number of such devices
multiplied by the retail value of the
device; or
(ii) The number of such devices
multiplied by the price a person
legitimately using the device to access
or make use of a copyrighted work
would have paid.’’.]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
The Commentary to § 2B5.3 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended by adding at
the end the following:
‘‘[Option One: Subsection (b)(3)(B)
and] Application Notes 1(a)(vii) and
[Option Two: (viii)][Option Three: 1(C)]
implement the directive in section 1(c)
of Public Law 109–181.’’.
Issues for Comment:
1. The Commission requests comment
regarding whether it should provide a
downward departure provision for cases
in which the infringement amount
overstates the seriousness of the offense.
2. The Commission requests comment
regarding the interaction of Application
Note 4 pertaining to the application of
§ 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust or
Use of Special Skill). This application
note, added in 2000 as part of the
Commission’s implementation of the No
Electronic Theft Act, provides that an
adjustment under § 3B1.3 shall apply in
any case in which the defendant deencrypted or otherwise circumvented a
technological security measure to gain
initial access to an infringed item. The
Commission has received comment that
not every de-encryption or
circumvention case involves a ‘‘special
skill’’ as that term is defined in § 3B1.3
(‘‘a skill not possessed by members of
the general public and usually requiring
substantial education, training or
licensing’’). Additionally, the proposed
amendment specifically addresses cases
involving the circumvention of a
technological measure, either in the
form of trafficking in devices used to
circumvent a technological measure or
in the determination of infringement
amount in cases involving actual
circumvention. Should the Commission
delete Application Note 4 because the
skill, whatever degree, needed to deencrypt or circumvent a technological
measure would be taken into account in
§ 2B5.3? As an alternative, should the
Commission modify the note to
emphasize that § 3B1.3 applies only
when the defendant’s skill in deencrypting or otherwise circumventing a
technological measure was one not
possessed by the general public, as
contemplated by § 3B1.3?
6. Terrorism
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment:
This multi-part proposed amendment
implements the USA PATRIOT
Improvement and Reauthorization Act
of 2005 (the ‘‘USA PATRIOT Act’’), Pub.
L. 109–177, and the Department of
Homeland Security Appropriations Act,
2007 (the ‘‘Homeland Security Act’’),
Pub. L. 109–295.
Part I of the proposed amendment
addresses section 122 of the PATRIOT
Act, which created a new offense in 21
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
U.S.C. 960a covering narco-terrorism.
This new offense prohibits engaging in
conduct that would be covered under 21
U.S.C. 841(a) if committed under the
jurisdiction of the United States,
knowing or intending to provide,
directly or indirectly, anything of
pecuniary value to any person or
organization that has engaged or engages
in terrorist activity (defined in section
212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act) or terrorism (defined in
section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign
Relations Authorization Act). The
penalty is not less than twice the
minimum punishment under 21 U.S.C.
841(b)(1) and not more than life. Section
960a also provides a mandatory term of
supervised release of at least 5 years.
The proposed amendment presents
two options for addressing this new
offense, although under either option
the sentence determination is the same.
Option 1 would amend § 2D1.1
(Unlawful Manufacturing, Importing,
Exporting, or Trafficking (Including
Possession with Intent to Commit These
Offenses); Attempt or Conspiracy) to
provide a new base offense level of 6
plus the offense level specified in the
Drug Quantity Table if the defendant
was convicted under 21 U.S.C. 960a (see
proposed § 2D1.1(a)(4)). Option 2 would
create a new guideline in § 2D1.14
(Narco-Terrorism) that would add 6
levels to the offense level determined
under § 2D1.1. Both options bracket the
exclusion of the mitigating role cap in
§ 2D1.1(a)(3) and the safety valve
reduction in § 2D1.1(b)(9) to highlight
this discussion point for the
Commission. The proposed amendment
also provides a corresponding
amendment to Appendix A (Statutory
Index).
Part II of the proposed amendment
addresses section 551 of the Homeland
Security Act, which created a new
offense in 18 U.S.C. 554 regarding the
construction of border tunnels and
subterranean passages that cross the
international boundary between the
United States and another country. (The
USA PATRIOT Act also amended title
18, United States Code, to provide a
new offense in 18 U.S.C. 554 for
smuggling goods from the United States.
For purposes of presenting proposed
statutory references, the proposed
amendments to Appendix A (Statutory
Index) for border tunnels is presented in
Part II and the proposed amendments to
Appendix A (Statutory Index) for
smuggling goods from the United States
is presented in Part IV.) Section 554(a)
prohibits the construction or financing
of such tunnels and passages and
provides a statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of 20 years. Section
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
554(b) prohibits the knowing or reckless
disregard of the construction on land
the person owns or controls and
provides a statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of 10 years. Section
554(c) prohibits the use of the tunnels
to smuggle an alien, goods (in violation
of 18 U.S.C. 545), controlled substances,
weapons of mass destruction (including
biological weapons), or a member of a
terrorist organization (defined in 18
U.S.C. 2339B(g)(6)) and provides a
penalty of twice the maximum term of
imprisonment that would have
otherwise been applicable had the
unlawful activity not made use of the
tunnel or passage.
Section 551(c) of the Homeland
Security Act also directs the
Commission, under its regular
amendment authority, to promulgate or
amend the guidelines to provide for
increased penalties for persons
convicted of offenses under 18 U.S.C.
554. In carrying out this directive, the
Commission ‘‘shall—
(A) Ensure that the sentencing
guidelines, policy statements, and
official commentary reflect the serious
nature of the offenses described in
section 554 of title 18, United States
Code, and the need for aggressive and
appropriate law enforcement action to
prevent such offenses;
(B) Provide adequate base offense
levels for offenses under such section;
(C) Account for any aggravating or
mitigating circumstances that might
justify exceptions, including—
(i) The use of a tunnel or passage
described in subsection (a) of such
section to facilitate other felonies; and
(ii) The circumstances for which the
sentencing guidelines currently provide
applicable sentencing enhancements;
(D) Ensure reasonable consistency
with other relevant directives, other
sentencing guidelines, and statutes;
(E) Make any necessary and
conforming changes to the sentencing
guidelines and policy statements; and
(F) Ensure that the sentencing
guidelines adequately meet the
purposes of sentencing set forth in
section 3553(a)(2) of title 18, United
States Code.
The proposed amendment provides a
new guideline in § 2X7.1 (Border
Tunnels and Subterranean Passages) for
this offense. If the defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. 554(a) or (c),
the base offense level would be 4 plus
the offense level applicable to the
underlying smuggling offense. If the
defendant was convicted under 18
U.S.C. 554(b), the proposed amendment
provides a base offense level of 8.
Part III of the proposed amendment
addresses other new offenses created by
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
the PATRIOT Act. Based on an
assessment of similar offenses already
covered by the relevant guidelines, the
proposed amendment provides for the
following:
(A) The new offense in 18 U.S.C. 554,
pertaining to smuggling of goods from
the United States is referenced to
§§ 2B1.5 (Cultural Heritage), 2M5.2
(Exportation of Arms, Munitions, or
Military Equipment or Services Without
Required Validated Export License), and
2Q2.1 (Offenses Involving Fish,
Wildlife, and Plants).
(B) The new offense in 18 U.S.C.
2282A, pertaining to mining of U.S.
navigable waters, is referenced to
§§ 2A1.1 (First Degree Murder), 2A1.2
(Second Degree Murder), 2B1.1 (Fraud,
Theft, and Property Damage), 2K1.4
(Arson; Property Damage by Use of
Explosives), and 2X1.1 (Attempt,
Solicitation, or Conspiracy (Not Covered
by a Specific Offense Guideline) ). The
proposed amendment also adds vessel,
maritime facility, and a vessel’s cargo to
§ 2K1.4(a)(1) and (a)(2) to cover conduct
described in 18 U.S.C. 2282A. The
definitions provided for vessel,
maritime facility, and aids to maritime
navigation come from title 33 of the
Code of Federal Regulations pertaining
to the United States Coast Guard,
specifically Navigation and Navigable
Waters.
Section 2282B, pertaining to violence
against maritime navigational aids, is
referenced to §§ 2B1.1, 2K1.4, and
2X1.1. Section 2K1.4(a) is amended to
provide a new base offense level of [16]
[if the offense involved the destruction
of or tampering with aids to maritime
navigation][if the offense of conviction
is 18 U.S.C. 2282B].
(C) The new offense in 18 U.S.C. 2283
pertaining to transporting biological and
chemical weapons is referenced to
§§ 2K1.3 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession,
or Transportation of Explosive
Materials; Prohibited Transactions
Involving Explosive Materials), 2M5.3
(Providing Material Support or
Resources to Designated Foreign
Terrorism Organizations of For a
Terrorist Purpose), 2M6.1 (Nuclear,
Biological, and Chemical Weapons, and
Other Weapons of Mass Destruction).
The new offense in 18 U.S.C. 2284
pertaining to transporting terrorists is
referenced to §§ 2M5.3, 2X2.1 (Aiding
and Abetting), and 2X3.1 (Accessory
After the Fact).
Part IV of the proposed amendment
addresses two other statutes that were
amended by the PATRIOT Act as
follows:
(A) Section 2341 of title 18, United
States Code, which provides definitions
for offenses involving contraband
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4387
cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, was
amended to reduce the number of
contraband cigarettes necessary to
violate the substantive offenses set forth
in 18 U.S.C. 2342 and 2344 from 60,000
to 10,000. The proposed amendment
makes conforming changes to the
background commentary of § 2E4.1
(Unlawful Conduct Relating to
Contraband Cigarettes). The proposed
amendment also expands the headings
of Chapter Two, Part E, Subpart 4 and
§ 2E4.1 to include smokeless tobacco.
(B) The Act increased the statutory
maximum term of imprisonment for
offenses covered by the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50
U.S.C. 1705) from 10 years to 20 years
to make penalties for these offenses
commensurate with terrorist financing
violations. The proposed amendment
references 50 U.S.C. 1705 to § 2M5.3
and also modifies the heading of the
guideline to include ‘‘specially
designated global terrorist’’ because it is
another list identifying terrorists and
terrorist organizations.
Part V of the proposed amendment
sets forth all of the proposed statutory
references in Appendix A (Statutory
Index) for the new offenses described in
Parts III and IV.
Part VI of the proposed amendment
presents two issues for comment. The
first requests comment regarding
whether current guideline penalties are
sufficient for increases in statutory
maximum terms of imprisonment to 18
U.S.C. 545 and 549. The second issue
for comment addresses a directive
contained in the Violence Against
Women and Department of Justice
Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L.
109–162, regarding a defendant who is
convicted of a Federal offense while
wearing or displaying insignia and
uniform received in violation of 18
U.S.C. 716.
Proposed Amendment
Part I Narco-Terrorism
[Option 1:
Section 2D1.1(a)(3) is amended by
inserting before ‘‘the offense level’’ the
following:
‘‘[except if the defendant is convicted
under 21 U.S.C. 960a,]’’; and by striking
the period at the end and inserting ‘‘;
or’’.
Section 2D1.1(a) is amended by
inserting after subsection (a)(3) the
following:
‘‘(4) [4][6] plus the offense level
specified in the Drug Quantity Table set
forth in subsection (c) if the defendant
was convicted under 21 U.S.C. 960a.’’.
Section 2D1.1(b)(9) is amended by
inserting before ‘‘decrease by two
levels.’’ the following:
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
4388
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
‘‘[and the defendant was not
convicted under 21 U.S.C. 960a,]’’. [Use
with Option to add 6 levels under
proposed subsection (a)(4):
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended by inserting
after the third paragraph the following:
‘‘Section 960a of title 21, United
States Code, provides that a defendant
shall be sentenced to a term of
imprisonment of not less than twice the
minimum punishment under 21 U.S.C.
841(b)(1). Adding six levels to the
offense level determined under the Drug
Quantity Table for convictions under 21
U.S.C. 960a establishes a guideline
range with a lower limit as close to
twice the statutory minimum as
possible; e.g., offense level 32 plus [6]
levels provides a range of 235 to 293
months, corresponding to a statutory
minimum of 20 years or 240 months.’’.]
[Option 2:
Chapter 2, Part D, Subpart 1, is
amended by adding at the end the
following new guideline and
accompanying commentary:
‘‘§ 2D1.14.—Narco-Terrorism
(a) Base Offense Level: [4][6] plus the
offense level from § 2D1.1 applicable for
the underlying offense[, except that
§ 2D1.1(a)(3) and (b)(9) shall not apply].
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 21 U.S.C. 960a.
Application Note:
1. In General.—The base offense level
is determined using the Drug Quantity
Table in § 2D1.1(c) and any appropriate
specific offense characteristics in
§ 2D1.1(b)(1) through (b)(8).
Background: This guideline
implements 21 U.S.C. § 960a, which
provides that a defendant shall be
sentenced to a term of imprisonment of
not less than twice the minimum
punishment under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1).
[Use the following with Option to add
six levels under subsection (a): Adding
six levels to the offense level
determined under § 2D1.1 establishes a
guideline range with a lower limit as
close to twice the statutory minimum as
possible; e.g., offense level 32 plus 6
levels provides a range of 235 to 293
months, corresponding to a statutory
minimum of 20 years or 240 months.].’’]
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is amended
by inserting after the line referenced to 21
U.S.C. § 960(d)(7) the following:
‘‘21 U.S.C. § 960a—[Option 1:
2D1.1][Option 2: 2D1.14]’’.
Part II—Border Tunnels
Chapter 2, Part X is amended by
adding at the end the following new
guideline and accompanying
commentary:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
‘‘7. OFFENSES INVOLVING BORDER
TUNNELS
§ 2X7.1.—Border Tunnels and
Subterranean Passages
‘‘(a) Base Offense Level:
(1) If the defendant was convicted
under 18 U.S.C. § 554(c), [4] plus the
offense level applicable to the
underlying smuggling offense. If the
resulting offense level is less than level
[16], increase to level [16].
(2) [16], if the defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 554(a); or
(3) [8][9], if the defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 554(b).
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 18 U.S.C. 554.
Application Note:
1. Definition.—For purposes of this
guideline, ‘underlying smuggling
offense’ means the smuggling offense
the defendant committed through the
use of the tunnel or subterranean
passage.’’.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. 553(a)(2) the
following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. 554—2X7.1’’.
Part III—Other New Offenses
The Commentary to § 2B1.5 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘554,’’ before ‘‘641,’’.
The Commentary to § 2M5.2
captioned ‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is
amended by inserting ‘‘18 U.S.C. 554,’’
before ‘‘22 U.S.C. 2778, 2780.’’.
The Commentary to § 2Q2.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘, 554’’ after ‘‘545’’.
The Commentary to § 2Q2.1 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended by striking
‘‘§ 545 where’’ and inserting ‘‘§§ 545
and 554 if’’.
Section 2K1.4 is amended in
subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2) by striking
‘‘a ferry,’’ each place it appears and
inserting ‘‘a maritime facility, a vessel,
or a vessel’s cargo,’’; by redesignating
subsection (a)(3) as (a)(4); and by
inserting the following after subsection
(a)(2):
‘‘(3) [16,] [if the offense involved the
destruction of or tampering with aids to
maritime navigation][if the offense of
conviction is 18 U.S.C. 2282B]; or’’.
Section 2K1.4(b)(2) is amended by
striking ‘‘(a)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)(4)’’.
The Commentary to § 2K1.4 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘2282A, 2282B,’’ after ‘‘2275,’’.
The Commentary to § 2K1.4 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 1 by inserting after ‘‘For purposes
of this guideline:’’ the following
paragraph:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
‘‘ ‘Aids to maritime navigation’ means
any device external to a vessel intended
to assist the navigator to determine
position or save course, or to warn of
dangers or obstructions to navigation.’’;
by inserting after ‘‘destructive device.’’
the following paragraph:
‘‘ ‘Maritime facility’ means any
structure or facility of any kind located
in, on, under, or adjacent to any waters
subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States and used, operated, or
maintained by a public or private entity,
including any contiguous or adjoining
property under common ownership or
operation.’’; by striking ‘‘1993(c)(5)’’ and
inserting ‘‘1992(d)(7)’’; and by adding at
the end the following:
‘‘ ‘Vessel’ includes every description
of watercraft or other artificial
contrivance used, or capable of being
used, as a means of transportation on
water.’’.
The Commentary to § 2K1.3 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘, 2283’’ after ‘‘1716’’.
The Commentary to § 2M5.3
captioned ‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is
amended by inserting ‘‘, 2283, 2284’’
after ‘‘18 U.S.C. §§ ’’.
Section 2M6.1 is amended in the
heading by inserting ‘‘Transport,’’ after
‘‘Transfer,’’.
The Commentary to § 2M6.1
captioned ‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is
amended by inserting ‘‘§ 2283,’’ before
‘‘2332a’’.
The Commentary to § 2X2.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘2284,’’ after ‘‘2’’.
The Commentary to § 2X3.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘2284,’’ after ‘‘1072,’’.
Part IV—Other PATRIOT Act Statutes
Chapter Two, Part E, Subpart Four is
amended in the heading by adding at
the end ‘‘AND SMOKELESS
TOBACCO’’.
Section 2E4.1 is amended in the
heading by adding at the end ‘‘and
Smokeless Tobacco’’.
The Commentary to § 2E4.1 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended by striking
‘‘60,000’’ and inserting ‘‘10,000’’.
Section 2M5.3 is amended in the
heading by inserting ‘‘Specially
Designated Global Terrorists, or’’ after
‘‘Organizations or’’.
The Commentary to § 2M5.3
captioned ‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is
amended by striking the period at the
end and inserting ‘‘; 50 U.S.C. 1705; 50
U.S.C. App. § 1701.’’.
The Commentary to § 2M5.3
captioned ‘‘Application Notes’’ is
amended in Note 1 by adding at the end
the following paragraph:
‘‘ ‘Specially designated global
terrorist’ means any foreign person or
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
person so designated pursuant to
Executive Order 13224 of September 23,
2001.’’.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Part V—Statutory Index Amendments
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. § 553(a)(2) the
following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. § 554 2B1.5, 2M5.2, 2Q2.1’’;
by inserting after the line referenced to
18 U.S.C. 2281 the following:
‘‘18 U.S.C. § 2282A—2A1.1, 2A1.2,
2B1.1, 2K1.4, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. § 2282B—2B1.1, 2K1.4, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. § 2283—2K1.3, 2M5.3, 2M6.1
18 U.S.C. § 2284—2M5.3, 2X2.1, 2X3.1’’;
in the line referenced to 18 U.S.C.
§ 2339 by inserting ‘‘2M5.3,’’ before
‘‘2X2.1’’;
by inserting after the line referenced to
50 U.S.C. § 783(c) the following:
‘‘50 U.S.C. § 1705—2M5.3’’; and
in the line referenced to 50 U.S.C. App.
§ 1701 by inserting ‘‘, 2M5.3’’ after
‘‘2M5.2’’.
Part VI—Issues for Comment
1. The USA PATRIOT Improvement
and Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L.
109–177 increased the statutory
maximum terms of imprisonment for 18
U.S.C. 545 from 5 years to 20 years and
for 18 U.S.C. 549 from 2 years to 10
years. The guidelines currently
reference 18 U.S.C. 545 offenses to
§§ 2B1.5 (Cultural Heritage), 2Q2.1
(Offenses Involving Fish, Wildlife, and
Plants), and 2T3.1 (Evading Import
Duties; Smuggling). Section 549 offenses
are referenced to §§ 2B1.1 (Theft, Fraud,
and Property Damage) and 2T3.1. The
Commission requests comment
regarding whether the current
referenced guidelines provide sufficient
penalties for 18 U.S.C. 545 and 549
offenses in light of the increased
statutory maximum terms of
imprisonment. If not, how should the
Commission amend these guidelines to
provide adequate punishment?
2. Part II of the proposed amendment
creates a new guideline, § 2X7.1 (Border
Tunnels and Subterranean Passages) to
implement the new offense in 18 U.S.C.
554. The Commission requests comment
regarding the proposed offense levels,
specifically whether the offense levels
for any of subsections ought to be higher
than proposed, and if so, what would be
appropriate offense levels for
convictions under 18 U.S.C. 554(a), (b),
and (c), respectively?
3. Section 1191(c) of Violence Against
Women and Department of Justice
Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L.
109–162, directs the Commission to
amend the guidelines ‘‘to assure that the
sentence imposed on a defendant who
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
is convicted of a Federal offense while
wearing or displaying insignia and
uniform received in violation of section
716 of title 18, United States Code,
reflects the gravity of this aggravating
factor.’’ Section 716, of title 18, United
States Code, is a class B misdemeanor
to which the guidelines do not apply.
Notwithstanding, the Commission
requests comment regarding how it
should address this directive. For
example, should the Commission
provide a Chapter Three adjustment
applicable in any case in which a
uniform or insignia received in violation
of 18 U.S.C. 716 was worn or displayed
during the commission of the federal
offense? If so, how many levels would
be appropriate for such an adjustment?
If not, what alternatives should the
Commission consider? Alternatively,
should the Commission amend Chapter
Five, Part K (Departures) to provide a
new upward departure provision for
such cases? The Commission also
requests comment regarding whether,
instead of an adjustment or departure,
the Commission should provide an
application note, perhaps in § 1B1.9
(Class B or C Misdemeanors and
Infractions), recognizing the directive
but explaining that the guidelines do
not apply to Class B or C misdemeanors.
7. Drugs
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment:
This proposed amendment addresses
new offenses created by the USA
PATRIOT Improvement and
Reauthorization Act of 2005 (the
‘‘PATRIOT Act’’), Pub. L. 109–177, and
the Adam Walsh Child Protection and
Safety Act of 2006 (the ‘‘Adam Walsh
Act’’), Pub. L. 109–248.
First, the proposed amendment
addresses 21 U.S.C. 865, which provides
a mandatory consecutive sentence of not
more than 15 years’ imprisonment for
any drug offense involving the
smuggling of methamphetamine or any
listed chemical while using a facilitated
entry program for entry into the United
States. The proposed amendment
provides a new two-level enhancement
in §§ 2D1.1(b)(5) and 2D1.11(b)(5) if the
defendant is convicted under 21 U.S.C.
865. A proposed application note in
both guidelines provides instruction as
to how the court should impose a
sentence in order to comply with the
statutory requirement of a consecutive
sentence.
Second, the proposed amendment
provides three options for addressing
the new offense in 21 U.S.C. 841(g),
which was created by the Adam Walsh
Act. This offense prohibits the use of the
Internet to distribute a date rape drug to
any person, ‘‘knowing or with
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4389
reasonable cause to believe that—(A) the
drug would be used in the commission
of criminal sexual conduct; or (B) the
person is not an authorized purchaser;’’
The statute defines ‘‘date rape drug’’ as
‘‘(i) gamma hydroxybutyric acid (GHB)
or any controlled substance analogue of
GHB, including gamma butyrolactone
(GBL) or 1,4-butanediol; (ii) ketamine;
(iii) flunitrazipam; or (iv) any substance
which the Attorney General designates
* * * to be used in committing rape or
sexual assault.’’ The penalty is not more
than 20 years’ imprisonment.
Option One provides a new [two-]
[four-]level enhancement in
§ 2D1.1(b)(9) if the defendant was
convicted under 21 U.S.C. 841(g).
Option Two focuses on the more serious
conduct of distributing the drug
knowing or having reason to believe it
would be used to commit criminal
sexual conduct. This option also
requires a conviction under 21 U.S.C.
841(g) but provides a four-level
enhancement if the defendant knew or
had reasonable cause to believe the drug
would be used in the commission of
criminal sexual conduct. Option Three
adopts a tiered approach: If the
defendant knew the drug was to be used
to commit criminal sexual conduct, add
six levels with a floor of 29; if the
defendant had reasonable cause to
believe the drug would be used to
commit criminal sexual conduct, add
three levels with a floor of 26; in all
other cases involving a conviction under
this section, that is to say, the defendant
sold the drug to an unauthorized
purchaser, add two levels. ‘‘Criminal
sexual conduct’’ is defined as any
offense covered by the criminal sexual
abuse guidelines (Chapter 2, Part A,
Section 3). (Section 841(g) of title 21,
United States Code, does not define this
term.)
Third, the proposed amendment
addresses the new offense in 21 U.S.C.
860a, which provides a mandatory
consecutive term of imprisonment of
not more than 20 years for
manufacturing, distributing, or
possessing with the intent to
manufacture or distribute,
methamphetamine on a premises in
which a minor is present or resides.
Two options are presented. The first
option recognizes that currently
§ 2D1.1(b)(8) provides a six-level
enhancement and a minimum offense
level of 30, if the offense involved the
manufacture of methamphetamine or
amphetamine and the offense created a
substantial risk of harm to the life of a
minor or incompetent (the ‘‘substantial
risk of harm’’ enhancement). The
Commission added this provision in
2000 in response to a very specific
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
4390
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
congressional directive contained in the
Methamphetamine Anti-Proliferation
Act of 2000, Pub. L. 106–310. See USSG
App. C (amendments 608 and 620
(effective Dec. 12, 2000, and Nov. 1,
2001, respectively)). To address the
overlap of conduct covered by the
substantial risk of harm enhancement
and the new offense, the proposed
amendment would apply in any case in
which the defendant is convicted under
21 U.S.C. § 860a and the substantial risk
of harm enhancement does not apply.
Thus, two levels will be applied in a
case in which a minor is present, but in
which the offense did not create a
substantial risk of harm to the life of a
minor. In any methamphetamine
manufacturing case in which the
government proves a substantial risk of
harm to the life of a minor, the offense
level will be increased by six levels and
the defendant will be subject to a
minimum offense level of 30. The
second option, recognizing that
manufacturing methamphetamine poses
an inherent danger to minors,
establishes an enhancement for
manufacturing and possession with
intent to manufacture that is separate
and apart from proving substantial risk
of harm to the life of the minor under
existing § 2D1.1(b)(8). Option Two adds
six levels with a floor of 29 if the
defendant manufactured or possessed
with intent to manufacture
methamphetamine on premises where a
minor resides or was present. If a
defendant distributed or possessed with
intent to distribute where a minor
resides or was present, add three levels
with a floor of 15.
Fourth, the proposed amendment
eliminates the offense level cap of 20 for
ketamine. Ketamine is a schedule III
controlled substance. Currently, the
Drug Quantity Table provides a
maximum of level 20 for most schedule
III substances because such substances
are subject to a statutory maximum of 5
years. If a defendant is convicted under
21 U.S.C. § 860a for distributing
ketamine, however, the defendant is
subject to a statutory maximum of 20
years. Accordingly, the Drug Quantity
Table in § 2D1.1(c) is modified to allow
for sentencing of 21 U.S.C. 860a offenses
involving quantities of ketamine
corresponding to offense levels greater
than level 20. The proposed amendment
also provides a marihuana equivalency
in Application Note 10 for ketamine (1
unit of ketamine = 1 gram of
marihuana).
Fifth, the proposed amendment adds
to Application Note 10 a new drug
equivalency table for 1,4-butanediol
(BD) and gamma butyrolactone (GBL),
both of which are included in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
definition of date rape drugs under 21
U.S.C. 841(g). Neither is a controlled
substance. The proposed drug
equivalency is 1 ml of BD or GBL equals
8.8 grams of marihuana.
Sixth, the proposed amendment
updates Appendix A (Statutory Index)
to include references to the new
offenses.
Finally, issues for comment request
input regarding the proposals
addressing 21 U.S.C. 841(g), 860a, and
865.
Proposed Amendment
Section 2D1.1(b) is amended by
redesignating subdivisions (8) and (9) as
subdivisions [Option 1 (21 U.S.C. 860a:
(11) and (12), respectively] [Option 2 (21
U.S.C. 860a: (10) and (11), respectively];
and by redesignating subdivisions (5)
through (7) as subdivisions (6) through
(8), respectively; and by inserting after
subdivision (4) the following:
‘‘(5) If the defendant is convicted
under 21 U.S.C. 865, increase by 2
levels.’’.
Section 2D1.1(b) is amended by
inserting after subdivision (8), as
redesignated by this amendment, the
following:
[Option 1 (21 U.S.C. 841(g)):
‘‘(9) If the defendant was convicted
under 21 U.S.C. 841(g), increase by
[2][4] levels.’’.]
[Option 2 (21 U.S.C. 841(g)):
‘‘(9) If the defendant was convicted
under 21 U.S.C. 841(g) of knowing, or
having reasonable cause to believe, that
the drug would be used in the
commission of criminal sexual conduct,
increase by [4] levels.’’.]
[Option 3 (21 U.S.C. 841(g)):
‘‘(9) (A) If the defendant committed
the offense under 21 U.S.C. 841(g)(1)(A)
and (i) knew that the date rape drug was
to be used to commit criminal sexual
conduct, add 6 levels; if the offense
level is less than 29, increase to 29; or
(ii) had reasonable cause to believe that
the drug would be used to commit
criminal sexual conduct, add 3 levels. If
the offense level is less than 26, increase
to 26.
(B) If the defendant committed the
offense under 21 U.S.C. 841(g)(1)(B) and
knew or had reasonable cause to believe
that the buyer was not an authorized
purchaser, increase by 2 levels.’’.]
[Option 1: (21 U.S.C. 860a):
Section 2D1.1(b) is amended by
inserting after subdivision (9), as
amended by this amendment, the
following:
‘‘(10) If (A) the defendant was
convicted under 21 U.S.C. 860a; and (B)
subsection (b)(11)(C) does not apply,
increase by 2 levels.’’;
and in subdivision (11), as
redesignated by this amendment, by
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
striking ‘‘greater’’ and inserting
‘‘greatest’’.]
[Option 2: (21 U.S.C. 860a):
Section 2D1.1 is amended in
subsection (b)(10), as redesignated by
this amendment, by striking ‘‘greater’’
and inserting ‘‘greatest’’; and by
inserting after subdivision (C) the
following:
‘‘(D) (i) If (I) the defendant was
convicted under 21 U.S.C. 860a; and (II)
the offense involved the manufacturing
or possession with intent to
manufacture methamphetamine on
premises in which an individual under
the age of 18 years is present or resides,
add [6] levels. If the resulting offense
level is less than [29], increase to level
[29]; or
(ii) If (I) the defendant was convicted
under 21 U.S.C. 860a; and (II) the
offense involved the distribution or
possession with intent to distribute
methamphetamine on premises in
which an individual under the age of 18
years is present or resides, increase by
[2][3] levels. If the resulting offense
level is less than [15], increase to [15]’’.]
Section 2D1.1(c)(1) is amended by
inserting ‘‘30,000,000 units or more of
Ketamine;’’ after the line referenced to
‘‘Hashish Oil’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(2) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 10,000,000 but less
than 30,000,000 units of Ketamine;’’
after the line referenced to ‘‘Hashish
Oil’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(3) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 3,000,000 but less
than 10,000,000 units of Ketamine;’’
after the line referenced to ‘‘Hashish
Oil’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(4) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 1,000,000 but less
than 3,000,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after
the line referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(5) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 700,000 but less than
1,000,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the
line referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(6) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 400,000 but less than
700,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the
line referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(7) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 100,000 but less than
400,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the
line referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(8) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 80,000 but less than
100,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the
line referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(9) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 60,000 but less than
80,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the line
referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(10) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 40,000 but less than
60,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the line
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’; and by
inserting ‘‘(except Ketamine)’’ after
‘‘Schedule III substances’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(11) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 20,000 but less than
40,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the line
referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’; and by
inserting ‘‘(except Ketamine)’’ after
‘‘Schedule III substances’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(12) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 10,000 but less than
20,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the line
referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’; and by
inserting ‘‘(except Ketamine)’’ after
‘‘Schedule III substances’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(13) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 5,000 but less than
10,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the line
referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’; and by
inserting ‘‘(except Ketamine)’’ after
‘‘Schedule III substances’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(14) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 2,500 but less than
5,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the line
referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’; and by
inserting ‘‘(except Ketamine)’’ after
‘‘Schedule III substances’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(15) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 1,000 units but less
than 2,500 units of Ketamine;’’ after the
line referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’; and by
inserting ‘‘(except Ketamine)’’ after
‘‘Schedule III substances’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(16) is amended by
inserting ‘‘At least 250 units but less
than 1,000 units of Ketamine;’’ after the
line referenced to ‘‘Hashish Oil’’; and by
inserting ‘‘(except Ketamine)’’ after
‘‘Schedule III substances’’.
Section 2D1.1(c)(17) is amended by
inserting ‘‘Less than 250 units of
Ketamine;’’ after the line referenced to
‘‘Hashish Oil’’; and by inserting
‘‘(except Ketamine)’’ after ‘‘Schedule III
substances’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is amended by
inserting ‘‘(g), 860a, 865,’’ after ‘‘(3),
(7),’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 10 in the ‘‘Drug Equivalency
Tables’’ in the subdivision captioned
‘‘Schedule III Substances’’ by inserting
in the heading ‘‘(except ketamine)’’ after
‘‘Substances’’;
by adding after the subdivision
captioned ‘‘Schedule III Substances’’ the
following new subdivision:
‘‘Ketamine
1 unit of ketamine = 1 gm of
marihuana’’;
and by adding after the subdivision
captioned ‘‘List I Chemicals (relating to
the manufacture of amphetamine or
methamphetamine)’’ the following new
subdivision: ‘‘Date Rape Drugs (except
flunitrazipam, GHB, or ketamine)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
1 ml of 1,4-butanediol = 8.8 gm
marihuana
1 ml of gamma butyrolactone = 8.8 gm
marihuana’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 19 [Option 1 (21 U.S.C. 860a): By
striking ‘‘(b)(8)’’ each place it appears
and inserting ‘‘(b)(11)’’] [[Option 2 (21
U.S.C. 860a): By striking ‘‘(b)(8)’’ and
inserting each place it appears’’(b)(10)’’].
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 20 [[Option 1 (21 U.S.C. 860a): By
striking ‘‘(b)(8)’’ each place it appears
and inserting ‘‘(b)(11)’’] [[Option 2 (21
U.S.C. 860a): By striking ‘‘(b)(8)’’ each
place it appears and inserting ‘‘(b)(10)’’].
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 21 [[Option 1 (21 U.S.C. 860a): By
striking ‘‘(b)(9)’’ each place it appears
and inserting ‘‘(b)(12)’’] [[Option 2 (21
U.S.C. 860a): by striking ‘‘(b)(9)’’ each
place it appears and inserting ‘‘(b)(11)’’].
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended by
redesignating Notes 22 through 25 as
Notes 23 through 26, respectively; and
by inserting after Note 21 the following:
‘‘22. Imposition of Consecutive
Sentence for 21 U.S.C. 860a or 865.—
Sections 860a and 865 of title 21, United
States Code, require the imposition of a
mandatory consecutive term of
imprisonment of not more than 20 years
and 15 years, respectively. In order to
comply with the relevant statute, the
court should determine the appropriate
‘‘total punishment’’ and divide the
sentence on the judgment form between
the sentence attributable to the
underlying drug offense and the
sentence attributable to 21 U.S.C. 860a
or 865, specifying the number of months
to be served consecutively for the
conviction under 21 U.S.C. 860a or 865.
[For example, if the applicable adjusted
guideline range is 151–188 months and
the court determines a ‘‘total
punishment’’ of 151 months is
appropriate, a sentence of 130 months
for the underlying offense plus 21
months for the conduct covered by 21
U.S.C. 860a or 865 would achieve the
‘total punishment’ in a manner that
satisfies the statutory requirement of a
consecutive sentence.’’.]
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 23, as redesignated by this
amendment, by striking ‘‘(5)’’ each place
it appears and inserting ‘‘(6)’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 25, as redesignated by this
amendment, by striking ‘‘(6)’’ each place
it appears and inserting ‘‘(7)’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4391
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 26, as redesignated by this
amendment, by striking ‘‘(7)’’ each place
it appears and inserting ‘‘(8)’’.
[Option 2 (21 U.S.C. 841(g)):
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended by
adding at the end the following:
‘‘27. Application of Subsection
(b)(9).—For purposes of this subsection,
‘criminal sexual conduct’ means an
offense covered by Chapter Two, Part A,
Subpart 3 (Criminal Sexual Abuse).’’.]
The Commentary to § 2D1.1 captioned
‘‘Background’’ is amended in the ninth
paragraph [[Option 1 (21 U.S.C. 860a):
By striking ‘‘(b)(8)’’ and inserting
‘‘(b)(11)’’] [[Option 2 (21 U.S.C. 860a):
By striking ‘‘(b)(8)’’ and inserting
‘‘(b)(10)’’]; and in the last paragraph
[[Option 1 (21 U.S.C. 860a): by striking
‘‘(b)(8)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b)(11)’’]
[[Option 2 (21 U.S.C. 860a): By striking
‘‘(b)(8)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b)(10)’’].
Section 2D1.11(b) is amended by
adding at the end the following
subdivision:
‘‘(5) If the defendant is convicted
under 21 U.S.C. 865, increase by 2
levels.’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.11
captioned ‘‘Statutory Provisions’’ is
amended by inserting ‘‘865,’’ after
‘‘(f)(1),’’.
The Commentary to § 2D1.11
captioned ‘‘Application Notes’’ is
amended by adding at the end the
following:
‘‘8. Imposition of Consecutive
Sentence for 21 U.S.C. 865.—Section
865 of title 21, United States Code,
requires the imposition of a mandatory
consecutive term of imprisonment of
not more than 15 years. In order to
comply with the relevant statute, the
court should determine the appropriate
‘total punishment’ and, on the judgment
form, divide the sentence between the
sentence attributable to the underlying
drug offense and the sentence
attributable to 21 U.S.C. 865, specifying
the number of months to be served
consecutively for the conviction under
21 U.S.C. 865. [For example, if the
applicable adjusted guideline range is
151–188 months and the court
determines a ‘total punishment’ of 151
months is appropriate, a sentence of 130
months for the underlying offense plus
21 months for the conduct covered by
21 U.S.C. 865 would achieve the ‘total
punishment’ in a manner that satisfies
the statutory requirement of a
consecutive sentence.’’.]
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is
amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 21 U.S.C. 841(f)(1) the
following:
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
4392
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
‘‘21 U.S.C. § 841(g)—2D1.1’’;
by inserting after the line referenced to
21 U.S.C. § 860 the following:
‘‘21 U.S.C. § 860a—2D1.1’’;
and by inserting after the line referenced
to 21 U.S.C. § 864 the following:
‘‘21 U.S.C. § 865—2D1.1, 2D1.11’’.
Issues for Comment:
1. Section 201 of the Adam Walsh
Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006,
Pub. L. 109–248, created a new offense
in 21 U.S.C. 841(g) for ‘‘knowingly using
the Internet to distribute a date rape
drug to any person, knowing or with
reasonable cause to believe that (A) the
drug would be used in the commission
of criminal sexual conduct; or (B) the
person is not an authorized purchaser.’’
The Commission requests comment
regarding this offense, particularly with
respect to the criminal sexual conduct
aspect. The proposed amendment
presents two options. Option One
would provide a [two-][four-]level
increase if the defendant was convicted
under 21 U.S.C. 841(g), regardless of
what the defendant knew or had
reasonable cause to believe. Option Two
would provide a four-level increase if
the defendant was convicted under 21
U.S.C. 841(g) and the defendant knew or
had reason to believe the drug would be
used in the commission of criminal
sexual conduct. Option Three would
provide a six level increase with a floor
of 29 if the defendant knew the drug
would be used in the commission of
criminal sexual conduct, and a three
level increase with a floor of 26 if the
defendant had reasonable cause to
believe that the drug would be used to
commit criminal sexual conduct. Where
the defendant sold the drug using the
internet to an unauthorized purchaser,
add two levels. Is there an alternative
approach that the Commission should
consider with respect to the criminal
sexual abuse aspect of the offense? For
example, should the Commission
provide a cross reference to the criminal
sexual abuse guidelines (§§ 2A3.1–
2A3.4) for defendants convicted under
21 U.S.C. 841(g)(A) even though it is not
the defendant who committed the
criminal sexual conduct?
The Commission also requests
comment regarding whether any
enhancement for a conviction under 21
U.S.C. 841(g) also should provide a
minimum offense level. If so, what
offense level would be appropriate?
2. Section 860a of title 21, United
States Code, prohibits manufacturing or
distributing, or possessing with the
intent to manufacture or distribute,
methamphetamine on a premises in
which an individual under the age of 18
years is present or resides. Two options
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
are presented. The first option uses the
existing § 2D1.1(b)(8)(C) in cases where
the government proves that
manufacturing methamphetamine poses
a substantial risk of harm to the minor
(add 6 levels with a floor of 30), and in
all other cases (i.e. distribution and
possession with intent to distribute),
add two levels. The second option
presumes that manufacturing
methamphetamine on premises where a
minor resides or was present poses a
risk of harm and thus calls for adding
six levels with a floor of 29. In
distribution or possession with intent to
distribute cases, option two would add
three levels with a floor of 15. The
Commission requests comment on
which option is preferable, or whether
there is an alternative approach that
should be considered. If Option One’s
approach were to be adopted, the
Commission requests comment
regarding whether the substantial risk of
harm enhancement (currently in
§ 2D1.1(b)(8)(C) but proposed to be
redesignated as § 2D1.1(b)(11)(C))
should be expanded to include
distribution of methamphetamine such
that distribution offenses that create a
substantial risk of harm to the life of a
minor or incompetent also would be
subject to the six-level enhancement
and the minimum offense level of 30.
Similarly, should it be expanded to
include possession with intent to
distribute or manufacture? If so, what
would constitute a substantial risk of
harm to the life of a minor or
incompetent in a case involving
methamphetamine distribution or
possession with intent to distribute or
manufacture methamphetamine? With
regard to Option Two, the Commission
requests comment on whether the six
level increase with a floor of 29, and the
three level increase with a floor of 15,
in manufacturing and distribution cases,
respectively, is appropriate, or whether
other levels would be more appropriate
for the offense.
Both options presented in the
proposed amendment are statute of
conviction based. As an alternative to a
statute of conviction based
enhancement, the Commission requests
comment regarding whether any
enhancement that implements 21 U.S.C.
860a should be relevant conduct based.
Additionally, rather than limit an
enhancement to the manufacture and/or
distribution of methamphetamine where
a minor resides or is present, should the
Commission expand any enhancement
to all drugs. Finally, should the
Commission expand the enhancement
to apply when this conduct occurs
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
where an incompetent resides or is
present?
3. The USA PATRIOT Improvement
and Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L.
109–177, established a new offense at 21
U.S.C. 865 that provides a mandatory
consecutive sentence of not more than
15 years’ imprisonment for any drug
offense involving the smuggling of
methamphetamine or
methamphetamine precursor chemical
while using a dedicated commuter lane,
an alternative or accelerated inspection
system, or other facilitated entry
program for entry into the United States.
The proposed amendment provides a
two-level enhancement in §§ 2D1.1(b)(5)
and 2D1.11(b)(5) if the defendant is
convicted in 21 U.S.C. 865.
The Commission requests comment
regarding this proposed enhancement.
Specifically, the Commission requests
comment on the following:
(a) Should this enhancement be
greater than two levels and, if so, what
would be appropriate? Additionally,
should there be a minimum offense
level and, if so, what offense level
would be appropriate?
(b) Should the Commission provide
an enhancement in §§ 2D1.1 and
2D1.11. that applies if the offense
involved the use of a facilitated entry
program to import drugs, regardless of
the type of drug the defendant is
convicted of importing, or conspiring to
import, under 21 U.S.C. 960 or 963,
respectively?
(c) Should the Commission amend
§ 3B1.3 (Abuse of Position of Trust or
Use of Special Skill), Application Note
2, to include offenses that involve use
of a facilitated entry program into the
United States among cases that receive
the § 3B1.3 adjustment? If so, should the
Commission provide a special
instruction in §§ 2D1.1 and 2D1.11 that
§ 3B1.3 applies if the defendant is
convicted of an offense under 21 U.S.C.
865?
8. Immigration
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment: In
April 2006, the Commission
promulgated a number of amendments
to the immigration guidelines, primarily
focusing on smuggling offenses. These
amendments became effective
November 1, 2006. This proposed
amendment addresses the number of
aliens involved in an offense, the
number of documents involved in an
offense, and options for modifying to
§ 2L1.2 (Unlawfully Entering or
Remaining in the United States). Two
issues for comment follow the proposed
amendment. The first requests input
regarding base offense levels in §§ 2L1.1
(Smuggling, Transporting, or Harboring
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
an Unlawful Alien), 2L2.1 (Trafficking
in a Document Relating to
Naturalization, Citizenship, or Legal
Resident Status, or a United States
Passport; False Statement in Respect to
the Citizenship or Immigration Status of
Another; Fraudulent Marriage to Assist
Alien to Evade Immigration Law), and
2L2.2 (Fraudulently Acquiring
Documents Relating to Naturalization,
Citizenship, or Legal Resident Status for
Own Use; False Personation or
Fraudulent Marriage by Alien to Evade
Immigration Law; Fraudulently
Acquiring or Improperly Using a United
States Passport). The second issue
requests comment regarding Lopez v.
Gonzalez, 127 S.Ct. 625 (Dec. 5, 2006).
Number of Aliens and Number of
Documents
The proposed amendment provides
two options for amending § 2L1.1(b)(2)
and 2L2.1(b)(2) regarding the number of
aliens and number of documents,
respectively, involved in the offense.
The first option maintains the current
structure of the table, which provides a
three-level increase for offenses
involving six to 24 aliens, a six-level
increase for offenses involving 25 to 99
aliens, and a nine-level increase for
offenses involving 100 or more aliens.
Option One amends the table to provide
a nine-level increase for offenses
involving 100 to 199 aliens, a [12]-level
increase for offenses involving 200 to
299 aliens, and a [15]-level increase for
offenses involving 300 or more aliens.
Option Two, in part, mirrors Option
One by providing the same increases at
the top end of the table for offenses
involving 100 or more aliens. However,
Option Two also provides smaller
categories at the low end of the table.
Offenses involving six to [15] aliens
would receive an increase of three
levels, [16 to 49] aliens would receive
an increase of [six] levels, and [50 to 99]
aliens would receive an increase of
[nine] levels.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
§ 2L1.2 (Unlawfully Entering or
Remaining in the United States)
The current structure of § 2L1.2
requires the court, using the ‘‘categorical
approach,’’ to assess whether a prior
conviction qualifies for a particular
category under the guideline. This
analysis is often complicated by lack of
documentation, competing case law
decisions, and the volume of cases. In
addition, § 2L1.2 contains different
definitions of covered offenses from the
statute. Courts, then, are faced with
making these assessments multiple
times in the same case. The proposed
amendment provides six options to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
address the complexity of this
guideline.
The first, second, and third options
amend the structure of § 2L1.2 by using
the statutory definition of aggravated
felony in combination with the length of
the sentence imposed for that prior
felony conviction. Option One provides
a 16-level increase for an aggravated
felony in which the sentence of
imprisonment imposed exceeded 13
months; a 12-level increase for an
aggravated felony in which the sentence
of imprisonment imposed was less than
13 months; and an eight-level increase
for all other aggravated felonies. Option
Two provides a 16-level increase for an
aggravated felony in which the sentence
of imprisonment imposed exceeded two
years; a 12-level increase for an
aggravated felony in which the sentence
of imprisonment imposed was at least
one year, but less than two years; and
an eight-level increase for all other
aggravated felonies. Option Three,
mirroring the criminal history
guidelines, provides a 16-level increase
for an aggravated felony in which the
sentence imposed exceeded 13 months;
a 12-level increase for an aggravated
felony in which the sentence imposed
was at least 60 days but did not exceed
13 months; and an eight-level increase
for all other aggravated felonies.
For Options One through Three, the
proposed amendment also eliminates
the categories of crimes of violence and
drug trafficking offenses from
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(E) (three or more
misdemeanor offenses).
The fourth option maintains the
current structure of § 2L1.2, except that
the categories of offenses delineated
under this guideline are defined by 8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(43), the statute providing
definitions for ‘‘aggravated felonies’’.
Additionally, this option provides use
of length of sentence of imprisonment
imposed in conjunction with ‘‘crime of
violence’’ to further distinguish between
the numerous types of prior convictions
that fall within this category.
The proposed amendment also
provides for an upward departure in any
case in which reliable information
indicates that the elements of the
offense set forth in the prior conviction
under-represent the seriousness of that
prior offense. This note is modeled after
§ 4A1.3 and could be used in
conjunction with any of Options One
through Four.
The fifth option provides an increased
base offense level and a reduction if the
prior conviction is not a felony.
The sixth option provides a 20-level
increase for prior convictions for a
national security or terrorism offense
and creates further distinctions among
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4393
type of conviction and length of prior
sentence in relation to enhancements
based on specific offense characteristics.
Proposed Amendment
[Option 1:
Section 2L1.1(b)(2) is amended by
striking subdivision (C) and inserting
the following:
‘‘(C) 100–199—add 9
(D) 200–299—add [12]
(E) 300 or more—add [15].]’’
[Option 2:
Section 2L1.1(b)(2) is amended by
striking subdivisions (A) through (C)
and inserting the following:
‘‘(A) 6–[15]—add 3
(B) [16–49]—add [6]
(C) [50–99]—add [9]
(D) [100–199]—add [12]
(E) [200–299]—add [15]
(F) [300 or more]—add [18].’’.]
The Commentary to § 2L1.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 3 by striking ‘‘100’’ and inserting
‘‘300’’.
Section 2L2.1(b)(2) is amended by
striking subdivision (C) and inserting
the following:
[Option 1:
‘‘(C) 100–199—add 9
(D) 200–299—add [12]
(E) 300 or more—add [15].]’’
[Option 2:
Section 2L2.1(b)(2) is amended by
striking subdivisions (A) through (C)
and inserting the following:
(A) 6–[15]—add 3
(B) [16–49]—add [6]
(C) [50–99]—add [9]
(D) [100–199]—add [12]
(E) [200–299]—add [15]
(F) [300 or more]—add [18].’’.]
The Commentary to § 2L2.1 captioned
‘‘Application Notes’’ is amended in
Note 5 by inserting ‘‘Application of
Subsection (b)(2).—’’ before ‘‘If the’’;
and by striking ‘‘100’’ and inserting
‘‘300’’.
Section 2L1.2 is amended by striking
the guideline and accompanying
commentary and inserting the
following:
[Option 1:
‘‘§ 2L1.2. Unlawfully Entering or
Remaining in the United States
(a) Base Offense Level: 8
(b) Specific Offense Characteristic
(1) Apply the Greatest:
If the defendant previously was
deported, or unlawfully remained in the
United States, after—
(A) A conviction for an aggravated
felony for which a sentence of
imprisonment exceeding 13 months was
imposed, increase by 16 levels;
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
4394
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
(B) A conviction for an aggravated
felony for which a sentence of
imprisonment of 13 months or less was
imposed, increase by 12 levels;
(C) A conviction for an aggravated
felony not covered by subdivision
(b)(1)(A) or (b)(1)(B), increase by 8
levels;
(D) A conviction for any other felony,
increase by 4 levels; or
(E) Three or more convictions for
misdemeanors, increase by 4 levels.
Commentary
Statutory Provisions: 8 U.S.C. 1325(a)
(second or subsequent offense only), 8
U.S.C. 1326. For additional statutory
provision(s), see Appendix A (Statutory
Index).
Application Notes:
1. Application of Subsection (b)(1).—
(A) In General.—For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
defendant has been removed or has
departed the United States while an
order of exclusion, deportation, or
removal was outstanding.
(ii) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
deportation was subsequent to the
conviction, regardless of whether the
deportation was in response to the
conviction.
(iii) A defendant shall be considered
to have unlawfully remained in the
United States if the defendant remained
in the United States following a removal
order issued after a conviction,
regardless of whether the removal order
was in response to the conviction.
(iv) Subsection (b)(1) does not apply
to a conviction for an offense committed
before the defendant was eighteen years
of age unless such conviction is
classified as an adult conviction under
the laws of the jurisdiction in which the
defendant was convicted.
(B) Definitions.—For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i) ‘Aggravated felony’ has the
meaning given that term in section
101(a)(43) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)),
without regard to the date of conviction
for the aggravated felony.
(ii) ‘Aggravated felony not covered by
subdivision (b)(1)(A) or (b)(1)(B)’ means
an aggravated felony for which the
sentence imposed was a sentence other
than imprisonment (e.g., probation).
(iii) ‘Felony’ means any federal, state,
or local offense punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding one
year.
(iv) ‘Sentence of imprisonment’ has
the meaning given that term in
Application Note 2 and subsection (b) of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
§ 4A1.2 (Definitions and Instructions for
Computing Criminal History), without
regard to the date of the conviction. The
length of the sentence imposed includes
any term of imprisonment given upon
revocation of probation, parole, or
supervised release.
2. Application of Subsection
(b)(1)(E).—For purposes of subsection
(b)(1)(E):
(A) ‘Misdemeanor’ means any federal,
state, or local offense punishable by a
term of imprisonment of one year or
less.
(B) ‘Three or more convictions’ means
at least three convictions for offenses
that are not considered ‘related cases’,
as that term is defined in Application
Note 3 of § 4A1.2 (Definitions and
Instructions for Computing Criminal
History).
3. Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracies,
and Attempts.—Prior convictions of
offenses counted under subsection (b)(1)
include the offenses of aiding and
abetting, conspiring, and attempting, to
commit such offenses.
4. Computation of Criminal History
Points.—A conviction taken into
account under subsection (b)(1) is not
excluded from consideration of whether
that conviction receives criminal history
points pursuant to Chapter Four, Part A
(Criminal History).
[5. Upward Departure Provision.—If
reliable information indicates that the
elements of the offense set forth in the
prior conviction under-represent the
seriousness of that prior offense, an
upward departure may be warranted.]’’.]
[Option 2:
‘‘§ 2L1.2. Unlawfully Entering or
Remaining in the United States
(a) Base Offense Level: 8
(b) Specific Offense Characteristic
(1) Apply the Greatest:
If the defendant previously was
deported, or unlawfully remained in the
United States, after—
(A) A conviction for an aggravated
felony for which the sentence imposed
exceeded 2 years, increase by 16 levels;
(B) A conviction for an aggravated
felony for which the sentence imposed
was at least 12 months but did not
exceed 2 years, increase by 12 levels;
(C) A conviction for an aggravated
felony, not covered in (b)(1)(A) or
(b)(1)(B), increase by 8 levels;
(D) A conviction for any other felony,
increase by 4 levels; or
(E) Three or more convictions for
misdemeanors, increase by 4 levels.
Commentary
Statutory Provisions: 8 U.S.C. 1325(a)
(second or subsequent offense only), 8
U.S.C. § 1326. For additional statutory
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
provision(s), see Appendix A (Statutory
Index).
Application Notes:
1. Application of Subsection (b)(1).—
(A) In General.—For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
defendant has been removed or has
departed the United States while an
order of exclusion, deportation, or
removal was outstanding.
(ii) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
deportation was subsequent to the
conviction, regardless of whether the
deportation was in response to the
conviction.
(iii) A defendant shall be considered
to have unlawfully remained in the
United States if the defendant remained
in the United States following a removal
order issued after a conviction,
regardless of whether the removal order
was in response to the conviction.
(iv) Subsection (b)(1) does not apply
to a conviction for an offense committed
before the defendant was eighteen years
of age unless such conviction is
classified as an adult conviction under
the laws of the jurisdiction in which the
defendant was convicted.
(B) Definitions.—For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i) ‘Aggravated felony’ has the
meaning given that term in section
101(a)(43) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)),
without regard to the date of conviction
for the aggravated felony.
(ii) ‘Aggravated felony not covered by
subdivision (b)(1)(A) or (b)(1)(B)’ means
an aggravated felony for which the
sentence imposed was a sentence other
than imprisonment (e.g., probation).
(iii) ‘Felony’ means any federal, state,
or local offense punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding one
year.
(iv) ‘‘Sentence of imprisonment’ has
the meaning given that term in
Application Note 2 and subsection (b) of
§ 4A1.2 (Definitions and Instructions for
Computing Criminal History), without
regard to the date of the conviction. The
length of the sentence imposed includes
any term of imprisonment given upon
revocation of probation, parole, or
supervised release.
2. Application of Subsection
(b)(1)(E).—For purposes of subsection
(b)(1)(E):
(A) ‘Misdemeanor’ means any federal,
state, or local offense punishable by a
term of imprisonment of one year or
less.
(B) ‘Three or more convictions’ means
at least three convictions for offenses
that are not considered ‘related cases’,
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
as that term is defined in Application
Note 3 of § 4A1.2 (Definitions and
Instructions for Computing Criminal
History).
3. Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracies,
and Attempts.—Prior convictions of
offenses counted under subsection (b)(1)
include the offenses of aiding and
abetting, conspiring, and attempting, to
commit such offenses.
4. Computation of Criminal History
Points.—A conviction taken into
account under subsection (b)(1) is not
excluded from consideration of whether
that conviction receives criminal history
points pursuant to Chapter Four, Part A
(Criminal History).
[5. Upward Departure Provision.—If
reliable information indicates that the
elements of the offense set forth in the
prior conviction under-represent the
seriousness of that prior offense, an
upward departure may be warranted.’’].]
[Option 3:
‘‘§ 2L1.2. Unlawfully Entering or
Remaining in the United States
(a) Base Offense Level: 8
(b) Specific Offense Characteristic
(1) Apply the Greatest:
If the defendant previously was
deported, or unlawfully remained in the
United States, after—
(A) A conviction for an aggravated
felony for which the sentence imposed
exceeded 13 months, increase by 16
levels;
(B) A conviction for an aggravated
felony for which the sentence imposed
was at least 60 days but did not exceed
13 months, increase by 12 levels;
(C) A conviction for an aggravated
felony not covered in (b)(1)(A) or
(b)(1)(B), increase by 8 levels;
(D) A conviction for any other felony,
increase by 4 levels; or
(E) Three or more convictions for
misdemeanors, increase by 4 levels.
Commentary
Statutory Provisions: 8 U.S.C. 1325(a)
(second or subsequent offense only), 8
U.S.C. § 1326. For additional statutory
provision(s), see Appendix A (Statutory
Index).
Application Notes:
1. Application of Subsection (b)(1).—
(A) In General.—For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
defendant has been removed or has
departed the United States while an
order of exclusion, deportation, or
removal was outstanding.
(ii) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
deportation was subsequent to the
conviction, regardless of whether the
deportation was in response to the
conviction.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
(iii) A defendant shall be considered
to have unlawfully remained in the
United States if the defendant remained
in the United States following a removal
order issued after a conviction,
regardless of whether the removal order
was in response to the conviction.
(iv) Subsection (b)(1) does not apply
to a conviction for an offense committed
before the defendant was eighteen years
of age unless such conviction is
classified as an adult conviction under
the laws of the jurisdiction in which the
defendant was convicted.
(B) Definitions.—For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i) ‘Aggravated felony’ has the
meaning given that term in section
101(a)(43) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)),
without regard to the date of conviction
for the aggravated felony.
(ii) ‘Aggravated felony not covered by
subdivision (b)(1)(A) or (b)(1)(B)’ means
an aggravated felony for which the
sentence imposed was a sentence other
than imprisonment (e.g., probation).
(iii) ‘Felony’ means any federal, state,
or local offense punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding one
year.
(iv) ‘Sentence of imprisonment’ has
the meaning given that term in
Application Note 2 and subsection (b) of
§ 4A1.2 (Definitions and Instructions for
Computing Criminal History), without
regard to the date of the conviction. The
length of the sentence imposed includes
any term of imprisonment given upon
revocation of probation, parole, or
supervised release.
2. Application of Subsection
(b)(1)(E).—For purposes of subsection
(b)(1)(E):
(A) ‘Misdemeanor’ means any federal,
state, or local offense punishable by a
term of imprisonment of one year or
less.
(B) ‘Three or more convictions’ means
at least three convictions for offenses
that are not considered ‘related cases’,
as that term is defined in Application
Note 3 of § 4A1.2 (Definitions and
Instructions for Computing Criminal
History).
3. Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracies,
and Attempts.—Prior convictions of
offenses counted under subsection (b)(1)
include the offenses of aiding and
abetting, conspiring, and attempting, to
commit such offenses.
4. Computation of Criminal History
Points.—A conviction taken into
account under subsection (b)(1) is not
excluded from consideration of whether
that conviction receives criminal history
points pursuant to Chapter Four, Part A
(Criminal History).
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4395
[5. Upward Departure Provision.—If
reliable information indicates that the
elements of the offense set forth in the
prior conviction under-represent the
seriousness of that prior offense, an
upward departure may be warranted.’’].
[Option 4:
‘‘§ 2L1.2. Unlawfully Entering or
Remaining in the United States
(a) Base Offense Level: 8
(b) Specific Offense Characteristic
(1) Apply the Greatest:
If the defendant previously was
deported, or unlawfully remained in the
United States, after—
(A) a conviction for an aggravated
felony that is (i) a drug trafficking
offense for which the sentence imposed
exceeded 13 months; (ii) a crime of
violence for which the sentence
imposed exceeded 13 months; (iii) a
firearms offense; (iv) a child
pornography offense; (v) a national
security or terrorism offense; (vi) a
human trafficking offense; or (vii) an
alien smuggling offense, increase by 16
levels;
(B) A conviction for an aggravated
felony that is a (i) drug trafficking
offense for which the sentence imposed
was 13 months or less; or (ii) crime of
violence for which the sentence
imposed was 13 months or less, increase
by 12 levels;
(C) A conviction for an aggravated
felony not covered by subdivisions
(b)(1)(A) or (b)(1)(B), increase by 8
levels;
(D) A conviction for any other felony,
increase by 4 levels; or
(E) Three or more convictions for
misdemeanors that are crimes of
violence or drug trafficking offenses,
increase by 4 levels.
Commentary
Statutory Provisions: 8 U.S.C.
§ 1325(a) (second or subsequent offense
only), 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For additional
statutory provision(s), see Appendix A
(Statutory Index).
Application Notes:
1. Application of Subsection (b)(1).—
(A) In General.—For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
defendant has been removed or has
departed the United States while an
order of exclusion, deportation, or
removal was outstanding.
(ii) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
deportation was subsequent to the
conviction, regardless of whether the
deportation was in response to the
conviction.
(iii) A defendant shall be considered
to have unlawfully remained in the
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
4396
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
United States if the defendant remained
in the United States following a removal
order issued after a conviction,
regardless of whether the removal order
was in response to the conviction.
(iv) Subsection (b)(1) does not apply
to a conviction for an offense committed
before the defendant was eighteen years
of age unless such conviction is
classified as an adult conviction under
the laws of the jurisdiction in which the
defendant was convicted.
(B) Definitions.—For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i) ‘Alien smuggling offense’ has the
meaning given that term in section
101(a)(43)(N) of the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(43)(N)).
(ii) ‘Child pornography offense’ is an
offense described in 8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(43)(I).
(iii) ‘Crime of violence’ has the
meaning given that term in 18 U.S.C.
§ 16.
(iv) ‘Drug trafficking offense’ has the
meaning given that term in 18 U.S.C.
924(c).
(v) ‘Firearms offense’ is an offense
described in 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(C) and
(E).
(vi) ‘’Human trafficking offense’ is an
offense described in 8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(43)(K).
(vii) ‘Sentence imposed’ has the
meaning given the term ‘sentence of
imprisonment’ in Application Note 2
and subsection (b) of § 4A1.2
(Definitions and Instructions for
Computing Criminal History), without
regard to the date of the conviction. The
length of the sentence imposed includes
any term of imprisonment given upon
revocation of probation, parole, or
supervised release.
(viii) ‘National security or terrorism
offense’ is an offense described in 8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)(L).
2. Definition of ‘Felony’.—For
purposes of subsection (b)(1)(A), (B),
and (D), ‘felony’ means any federal,
state, or local offense punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding one
year.
3. Application of Subsection
(b)(1)(C).—(A) Definitions.—For
purposes of subsection (b)(1)(C),
‘aggravated felony’ has the meaning
given that term in section 101(a)(43) of
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(43)), without regard to
the date of conviction for the aggravated
felony.
(B) In General.—The offense level
shall be increased under subsection
(b)(1)(C) for any aggravated felony (as
defined in subdivision (A)), with respect
to which the offense level is not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
increased under subsections (b)(1)(A) or
(B).
4. Application of Subsection
(b)(1)(E).—For purposes of subsection
(b)(1)(E):
(A) ‘Misdemeanor’ means any federal,
state, or local offense punishable by a
term of imprisonment of one year or
less.
(B) ‘Three or more convictions’ means
at least three convictions for offenses
that are not considered ‘related cases’,
as that term is defined in Application
Note 3 of § 4A1.2 (Definitions and
Instructions for Computing Criminal
History).
5. Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracies,
and Attempts.—Prior convictions of
offenses counted under subsection (b)(1)
include the offenses of aiding and
abetting, conspiring, and attempting, to
commit such offenses.
6. Computation of Criminal History
Points.—A conviction taken into
account under subsection (b)(1) is not
excluded from consideration of whether
that conviction receives criminal history
points pursuant to Chapter Four, Part A
(Criminal History).
[7. Upward Departure Provision.–If
reliable information indicates that the
elements of the offense set forth in the
prior conviction under-represent the
seriousness of that prior offense, an
upward departure may be warranted.’’.]]
[Option 5:
‘‘§ 2L1.2. Unlawfully Entering or
Remaining in the United States
(a) Base Offense Level:[16][20][24]
(b) Specific Offense Characteristic
[(1) If the defendant does not have a
prior conviction for a felony, decrease
by [8][6][4] levels.]
Commentary
Statutory Provisions: 8 U.S.C. 1325(a)
(second or subsequent offense only), 8
U.S.C. § 1326. For additional statutory
provision(s), see Appendix A.
Application Notes:
1. Definition of ‘Felony’.—For
purposes of subsection (b)(1)(A), (B),
and (D), ‘felony’ means any federal,
state, or local offense punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding one
year.
2. Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracies,
and Attempts.—Prior convictions of
offenses counted under subsection (b)(1)
include the offenses of aiding and
abetting, conspiring, and attempting, to
commit such offenses.’’.]
[Option 6:
‘‘§ 2L1.2. Unlawfully Entering or
Remaining in the United States
(a) Base Offense Level: 8
(b) Specific Offense Characteristic
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
(1) Apply the Greatest:
If the defendant previously was
removed, deported, or unlawfully
remained in the United States, after—
(A) a prior conviction for a national
security or terrorism offense, increase by
20 levels;
(B) A prior conviction resulting in a
sentence of imprisonment of at least 13
months, or a prior conviction for
murder, rape, a child pornography
offense or an offense involving sexual
abuse of a child, or three prior
convictions resulting in sentences of
imprisonment of at least 60 days,
increase by 16 levels;
(C) A prior conviction resulting in a
sentence of imprisonment of at least 6
months, or two prior convictions
resulting in sentences of imprisonment
of at least 60 days, increase by 12 levels;
(D) A prior conviction resulting in a
sentence of imprisonment of at least 60
days, increase by 8 levels;
(E) A prior conviction resulting in a
sentence of imprisonment or a
conviction for any other felony, increase
by 4 levels.
Commentary
Statutory Provisions: 8 U.S.C. 1325(a)
(second or subsequent offense only), 8
U.S.C. § 1326. For additional statutory
provision(s), see Appendix A (Statutory
Index).
Application Notes:
1. Application of Subsection (b)(1).—
(A) In General.-For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
defendant has been removed or has
departed the United States while an
order of exclusion, deportation, or
removal was outstanding.
(ii) A defendant shall be considered to
be deported after a conviction if the
deportation was subsequent to the
conviction, regardless of whether the
deportation was in response to the
conviction.
(iii) A defendant shall be considered
to have unlawfully remained in the
United States if the defendant remained
in the United States following a removal
order issued after a conviction,
regardless of whether the removal order
was in response to the conviction.
(iv) Subsection (b)(1) does not apply
to a conviction for an offense committed
before the defendant was eighteen years
of age unless such conviction is
classified as an adult conviction under
the laws of the jurisdiction in which the
defendant was convicted.
(B) Definitions.—For purposes of
subsection (b)(1):
(i)‘Child pornography offense’ means
(I) an offense described in 18 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
§ 2251, § 2251A, § 2252, § 2252A, or
§ 2260; or (II) an offense under state or
local law consisting of conduct that
would have been an offense under any
such section if the offense had occurred
within the special maritime and
territorial jurisdiction of the United
States.
(ii) ‘Offense involving sexual abuse of
a child’ means an offense where the
victim is under 18 years of age and is
any of the following: an offense
described in 18 U.S.C. 2242, a forcible
sex offense, statutory rape, or sexual
abuse of a minor.
(iii) ‘Sentence of imprisonment’ has
the meaning given in Application Note
2 and subsection (b) of § 4A1.2
(Definitions and Instructions for
Computing Criminal History), without
regard to the date of the conviction. The
length of the sentence imposed includes
any term of imprisonment given upon
revocation of probation, parole, or
supervised release.
(iv) ‘National security offense’ means
an offense to which the Chapter 2M
guidelines apply. ‘Terrorism offense’
means any offense involving, or
intending to promote, a ‘Federal crime
of terrorism’, as that term is defined in
18 U.S.C. 2332b(g)(5).
2. Definition of ‘Felony’.—For
purposes of subsection (b)(1)(E), ‘felony’
means any federal, state, or local offense
punishable by imprisonment for a term
exceeding one year.
3. Sentences of imprisonment are
counted separately if they are for
offenses that are not considered ‘related
cases’, as that term is defined in
Application Note 3 of § 4A1.2
(Definitions and Instructions for
Computing Criminal History).
4. Aiding and Abetting, Conspiracies,
and Attempts.—Prior convictions of
offenses counted under subsection (b)(1)
include the offenses of aiding and
abetting, conspiring, and attempting, to
commit such offenses.
5. Computation of Criminal History
Points.—A conviction taken into
account under subsection (b)(1) is not
excluded from consideration of whether
that conviction receives criminal history
points pursuant to Chapter Four, Part A
(Criminal History).’’.] Issues for
Comment:
1. In April 2006, the Commission
promulgated an amendment that
increased the base offense level in
§ 2L1.1 (Smuggling, Transporting, or
Harboring an Unlawful Alien) for
offenses related to national security. See
USSG App C (amendment 692)
(effective Nov. 1, 2006). The
Commission requests comment
regarding whether it should increase the
base offense levels in § 2L1.1(a)(2)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
(providing level 23 for previous
conviction for an aggravated felony) and
(a)(3) (providing level 12, otherwise).
Should the Commission increase the
base offense levels in §§ 2L2.1
(Trafficking in a Document Relating to
Naturalization, Citizenship, or Legal
Resident Status, or a United States
Passport; False Statement in Respect to
the Citizenship or Immigration Status of
Another; Fraudulent Marriage to Assist
Alien to Evade Immigration Law) and
2L2.2 (Fraudulently Acquiring
Documents Relating to Naturalization,
Citizenship, or Legal Resident Status for
Own Use; False Personation or
Fraudulent Marriage by Alien to Evade
Immigration Law; Fraudulently
Acquiring or Improperly Using a United
States Passport)? If so, what offense
levels would be appropriate for each
relevant guideline?
2. The Commission requests comment
regarding the Supreme Court’s decision
in Lopez v. Gonzalez, 126 S.Ct. 625
(Dec. 5, 2006). In Lopez, the Supreme
Court held that state drug convictions
for conduct treated as a felony by the
state, but as a misdemeanor under the
federal Controlled Substances Act, do
not constitute aggravated felonies under
the Immigration and Nationality Act.
Under federal criminal law, a conviction
for an aggravated felony subjects an
alien who unlawfully re-enters the
United States to an enhanced statutory
maximum penalty (see 8 U.S.C.
1326(b)(2)) and to an 8-level
enhancement under the subsection
(b)(1)(C) of § 2L1.2. Section 2L1.2
defines ‘‘aggravated felony’’ as having
the same meaning given that term in 8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(43). Given that the
guidelines reference the statutory
definition of ‘‘aggravated felony,’’ the
Commission requests comment
regarding whether the guidelines should
be amended, if at all, in light of Lopez
v. Gonzalez?
9. Issue for Comment: Reductions In
Sentence Based on BOP Motion
(Compassionate Release)
In April 2006, the Commission
promulgated a new policy statement at
§ 1B1.13 (Reduction in Term of
Imprisonment as a Result of Motion by
Director of Bureau of Prisons), which
became effective November 1, 2006. On
May 15, 2006, the Commission
published an issue for comment stating
its intent to consider, in the 2006–2007
amendment cycle, developing further
criteria and a list of specific examples
of extraordinary and compelling reasons
for sentence reduction pursuant to such
statute. See 71 FR 28062. The
Commission requested comment and
specific suggestions for appropriate
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
4397
criteria and examples, as well as
guidance regarding the extent of any
such reduction and modifications to a
term of supervised release.
The Commission received comment
pursuant to this request and hereby
requests any additional comment
regarding appropriate criteria and
examples of extraordinary and
compelling reasons. For example,
should the Commission modify § 1B1.13
to provide that a reduction in a term of
imprisonment should be made only if
the extraordinary and compelling reason
warranting the reduction involves a
circumstance or condition that (i) was
unknown to the court at the time of
sentencing; (ii) was known to or
anticipated by the court at the time of
sentencing but that has changed
substantially since that time; or (iii) was
prohibited from being taken into
account by the court at the time of
sentencing but is no longer prohibited
because of a change in applicable law?
With respect to examples of
extraordinary and compelling reasons,
should the fact that the defendant is
suffering from a terminal illness be a
sufficient basis for a reduction, or
should a reduction be limited to
situations in which the defendant’s
terminal illness reduces the defendant’s
life expectancy to less than 12 months?
Should examples of extraordinary and
compelling reasons be limited to
medical conditions, and if not, what
other factors should provide a basis for
a reduction under § 1B1.13? Should the
Commission provide for a combination
approach, allowing the court to consider
more than one reason, each of which
alone is not extraordinary and
compelling but that, taken together,
make the rationale for a reduction
extraordinary and compelling? Should
§ 1B1.13 provide that the Bureau of
Prisons may determine that, in any
particular defendant’s case, an
extraordinary and compelling reason
other than a reason identified by the
Commission warrants a reduction?
10. Issues for Comment: Criminal
History
1. The Commission has identified as
a policy priority for this amendment
cycle the continuation of its policy work
on Chapter Four (Criminal History and
Criminal Livelihood), in part because
criminal history is among the most
frequently cited reasons for a below
guideline range sentence. See 71 FR
56578 (Sept. 27, 2006). The Commission
has begun examining ways to improve
the operation of Chapter Four.
As part of this process the
Commission held two round-table
discussions regarding criminal history
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2
4398
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices
in Washington, DC, on November 1 and
3, 2006, to gather input from judges,
academics, federal prosecutors, federal
public defenders and other defense
practitioners, probation officers, and
other users of the federal sentencing
guidelines. One topic of interest was the
use of minor offenses (i.e., misdemeanor
and petty offenses) in determining a
defendant’s criminal history score.
Pursuant to § 4A1.2(c), sentences for
misdemeanors and petty offenses
(‘‘minor offenses’’) are counted for
criminal history purposes with a limited
number of exceptions. Some minor
offenses are counted only if the sentence
was a term of probation of at least one
year or a term of imprisonment of at
least 30 days, or the prior offense was
similar to the instant offense. Examples
of offenses that fall within this
exception include reckless driving,
disorderly conduct, driving with a
suspended license, gambling,
prostitution, and resisting arrest. See
§ 4A1.2(c)(1) for the full list of offenses
in this category. Certain minor offenses
such as hitchhiking, juvenile status
offenses and truancy, loitering, minor
traffic infractions (e.g., speeding), public
intoxication, and vagrancy are never
counted in criminal history. See
§ 4A1.2(c)(2). Furthermore, several
circuit courts have developed varying
tests to determine if a conviction falls
within the list of offenses provided in
§ 4A1.2(c)(1) or (c)(2).
The Commission requests comment
regarding the use of minor offenses in
determining a defendant’s criminal
history score. Specifically, how
reflective of the defendant’s culpability
are minor offenses? Should the
Commission consider specifically
excluding other minor offenses from the
criminal history determination and, if
so, which offenses should be excluded?
Conversely, should the Commission
consider specifically including
additional minor offenses for purposes
of determining a defendant’s criminal
category? Should the Commission
include any minor offense that has a
term of probation of at least one year, or
a term of imprisonment of at least 30
days, or if the prior offense was similar
to the instant offense (as currently
provided in § 4A1.2(c)(1))?
The Commission also requests
comment regarding whether there is an
alternate point value that the
Commission should consider assigning
to minor offenses, or whether there is an
alternative way of counting minor
offenses for criminal history purposes.
For example, should the Commission
consider providing criminal history
points only after a defendant has
multiple convictions for minor offenses?
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:15 Jan 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Should the Commission consider not
assigning or assigning some alternative
point value for recency and status
points to minor offenses? (See
§ 4A1.1(d)–(e).) Alternatively, should
minor offenses be used only for
purposes of an upward departure under
§ 4A1.3 (Departures Based on
Inadequacy of Criminal History
Category)?
2. Another topic of interest among the
round-table participants was the
definition of ‘‘related cases’’ under
Application Note 3 of § 4A1.2
(Definitions and Instructions for
Computing Criminal History). Currently,
prior sentences are considered related if
there is not intervening arrest and they
resulted from offenses that (A) occurred
on the same occasion; (B) were part of
a single common scheme or plan; or (C)
were consolidated for trial or
sentencing. Each of these criteria has
been the subject of much litigation in
the district and appellate courts,
including a decision by the Supreme
Court regarding the consolidation aspect
of the definition. See Buford v. United
States, 532 U.S. 59 (2001). Furthermore,
a number of appellate opinions have
suggested that the Commission
reexamine the application of the
definition of related cases when
sentences are not separated by an
intervening arrest. The Commission
requests comment regarding the
definition of ‘‘related cases.’’ With
respect to the instances described in
subdivisions (A), (B), and (C), are there
factors that would help the court
determine whether a case is related to
another case? For example, should the
Commission provide a list of factors for
the court to use in determining whether
prior convictions are consolidated for
sentencing? In general, is the current
definition for related cases too
restrictive and, if so, how should the
definition be modified or expanded?
11. Issue for Comment: Implementation
of the Telephone Records and Privacy
Protection Act of 2006
The Telephone Records and Privacy
Protection Act of 2006, Pub. L. 109–476,
created a new offense in 18 U.S.C. 1039
pertaining to the fraudulent acquisition
or disclosure of confidential telephone
records. Section 4 of the Act requires
the Commission to ‘‘review and, if
appropriate, amend the Federal
sentencing guidelines and policy
statements applicable to persons
convicted of any offense under section
1039 of title 18, United States Code.’’
The Act requires the Commission to
promulgate an amendment not later
than 180 days after the enactment of the
Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
The Commission requests comment
regarding how best to implement this
legislation, particularly in light of the
mandatory consecutive penalties
provided for certain forms of aggravated
conduct, and keeping in mind the
Commission’s simplification efforts. For
example, should the Commission
reference this offense to § 2H3.1 as it is
proposed to be amended in the
Miscellaneous Laws proposed
amendment? That proposed amendment
expands the heading of the guideline to
include the unauthorized disclosure of
any private information, which would
include confidential telephone records.
If it should be referenced to § 2H3.1, are
there additional modifications (e.g.
special offense characteristics) that
should be made to that guideline to
implement the new offense?
12. Issue for Comment: Cocaine
Sentencing Policy
The Commission identified as a
policy priority for the current
amendment cycle ending May 1, 2007,
the ‘‘continuation of its work with the
congressional, executive, and judicial
branches of the government and other
interested parties on cocaine sentencing
policy’’, including updating the
Commission’s 2002 Report to Congress,
Cocaine and Federal Sentencing Policy,
which is available on the Commission’s
Web site at www.ussc.gov.
In working to address this priority,
the Commission currently is updating
the information contained in its 2002
Report. As part of this process, the
Commission gathered information at a
public hearing it held on cocaine
sentencing policy on November 14,
2006. At that hearing, the Commission
received testimony from the executive
and judicial branches of the federal
government, State and local agencies,
the defense bar, medical and drug
treatment experts, academics, and
community interest groups. Witnesses at
that hearing expressed a variety of views
about the nature and characteristics of
cocaine offenses and offenders and
suggested a number of proposals for
addressing federal cocaine penalties.
Testimony of the witnesses, as well as
a transcript of the public hearing, can be
found on the Commission’s Web site.
The Commission invites comment on
any or all of the testimony received at
the November 14, 2006, public hearing,
including comment on any of the
suggestions at that hearing or any other
suggestions (such as possible changes in
the Drug Quantity Table) for addressing
federal cocaine penalties.
[FR Doc. E7–1349 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2211–01–P
E:\FR\FM\30JAN2.SGM
30JAN2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4372-4398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1349]
[[Page 4371]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
United States Sentencing Commission
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Proposed Amendments to Sentencing Guidelines, Policy
Statements, and Commentary. Request for Public Comment, Including
Public Comment Regarding Retroactive Application of Any of the Proposed
Amendments. Notice of Public Hearing; Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 /
Notices
[[Page 4372]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION
Sentencing Guidelines for United States Courts
AGENCY: United States Sentencing Commission.
ACTION: Notice of proposed amendments to sentencing guidelines, policy
statements, and commentary. Request for public comment, including
public comment regarding retroactive application of any of the proposed
amendments. Notice of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 994(a), (o), and (p) of title 28, United
States Code, the United States Sentencing Commission is considering
promulgating certain amendments to the sentencing guidelines, policy
statements, and commentary. This notice sets forth the proposed
amendments and, for each proposed amendment, a synopsis of the issues
addressed by that amendment. This notice also provides multiple issues
for comment, some of which are contained within proposed amendments.
The specific proposed amendments and issues for comment in this
notice are as follows: (A) Proposed amendment to Sec. Sec. 2A1.1
(First Degree Murder), 2A1.2 (Second Degree Murder), 2A1.3 (Voluntary
Manslaughter), 2A1.4 (Involuntary Manslaughter), 2A2.1 (Assault with
Intent to Commit Murder; Attempted Murder), 2A2.2 (Aggravated Assault),
2A2.3 (Minor Assault), 2A2.4 (Obstructing or Impeding Officers), 2A5.2
(Interference with Flight Crew Member or Flight Attendant; Interference
with Dispatch, Operation, or Maintenance of Mass Transportation Vehicle
or a Ferry), 2A6.1 (Threatening or Harrassing Communications; Hoaxes),
2B1.1 (Fraud, Theft, and Property Damage), 2C1.1 (Offering, Giving,
Soliciting, or Receiving a Bribe; Extortion Under Color of Official
Right; Fraud Involving the Deprivation of the Intangible Right to
Honest Services of Public Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud by
Interference with Governmental Functions), 2B2.3 (Trespass), 2K1.4
(Arson; Property Damage by Use of Explosives), 2M6.1 (Nuclear,
Biological, and Chemical Weapons, and Other Weapons of Mass
Destruction), 2Q1.1 (Knowing Endangerment Resulting From Mishandling
Hazardous or Toxic Substances, Pesticides or Other Pollutants), 2X1.1
(Attempt, Solicitation, or Conspiracy (Not Covered by a Specific
Offense Guideline)), 2X5.2 (Class A Misdemeanor Offenses (Not Covered
by a Specific Offense Guideline)), Appendix A, and issues for comment
regarding implementation of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and
Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-177 (hereinafter the ``PATRIOT
Act'') and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, Pub. L. 109-59, as these laws pertain
to transportation offenses; (B) proposed amendment to Chapter Two,
Parts A and G, Sec. Sec. 2A3.1 (Criminal Sexual Abuse; Attempt to
Commit Criminal Sexual Abuse), 2A3.3 (Criminal Sexual Abuse of a Ward
or Attempt to Commit Such Acts), 2A3.4 (Abusive Sexual Contact or
Attempt to Commit Abusive Sexual Contact), 2G1.1 (Promoting a
Commercial Sex Act or Prohibited Sexual Conduct with an Individual
Other than a Minor), 2G1.3 (Promoting a Commercial Sex Act or
Prohibited Sexual Conduct with a Minor; Transportation of Minors to
Engage in a Commercial Sex Act or Prohibited Sexual Conduct), 2G2.5
(Recordkeeping Offenses Involving the Production of Sexually Explicit
Materials; Failure to Provide Required Marks in Commercial Electronic
Email), 2G3.1 (Importing, Mailing, or Transporting Obscene Matter;
Transferring Obscene Matter to a Minor; Misleading Domain Names), 2H3.1
(Interception of Communications; Eavesdropping; Disclosure of Tax
Return Information), 2J1.2 (Obstruction of Justice), 4B1.5 (Repeat and
Dangerous Sex Offender Against Minors), 5B1.3 (Conditions of
Probation), 5D1.2 (Term of Supervised Release), 5D1.3 (Conditions of
Supervised Release), Appendix A, and issues for comment regarding
implementation of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of
2006, Pub. L. 109-248 (hereinafter the ``Adam Walsh Act''); (C)
proposed amendment to re-promulgate as a permanent amendment the
temporary, emergency amendment to Sec. 2B5.3 (Criminal Infringement of
Copyright or Trademark), effective September 12, 2006 (see USSG
Supplement to Appendix C (Amendment 682)), and issues for comment
regarding implementation of the Stop Counterfeiting in Manufactured
Goods Act, Pub. L. 109-181; (D) proposed amendment to Chapter Two,
Parts D and X, Sec. Sec. 2A1.1, 2A1.2, 2B1.1, 2B1.5 (Theft of, Damage
to, or Destruction of Cultural Heritage Resources; Unlawful Sale,
Purchase, Exchange, Transportation, or Receipt of Cultural Heritage
Resources), 2D1.1 (Unlawful Manufacturing, Importing, Exporting, or
Trafficking (Including Possession with Intent to Commit These
Offenses); Attempt or Conspiracy), 2E4.1 (Unlawful Conduct Relating to
Contraband Cigarettes), 2K1.3 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or
Transportation of Explosive Materials; Prohibited Transactions
Involving Explosive Materials), 2K1.4, 2M5.3 (Providing Material
Support or Resources to Designated Foreign Terrorism Organizations of
For a Terrorist Purpose), 2M6.1, 2Q2.1 (Offenses Involving Fish,
Wildlife, and Plants), 2X1.1, 2X2.1 (Aiding and Abetting), 2X3.1
(Accessory After the Fact), Appendix A, and issues for comment
regarding implementation of the PATRIOT Act and the Department of
Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2007, Pub. L. 109-295, as these
laws pertain to terrorism offenses and border protection; (E) proposed
amendment to Sec. Sec. 2D1.1, 2D1.11 (Unlawfully Distributing,
Importing, Exporting, or Possessing a Listed Chemical; Attempt or
Conspiracy), Appendix A (Statutory Index), and issues for comment
regarding implementation of the PATRIOT Act and the Adam Walsh Act as
these laws pertain to drug offenses; (F) proposed amendment to
Sec. Sec. 2L1.1 (Smuggling, Transporting, or Harboring an Unlawful
Alien), 2L1.2 (Unlawfully Entering or Remaining in the United States),
2L2.1 (Trafficking in a Document Relating to Naturalization,
Citizenship, or Legal Resident Status, or a United States Passport;
False Statement in Respect to the Citizenship or Immigration Status of
Another; Fraudulent Marriage to Assist Alien to Evade Immigration Law),
and 2L2.2 (Fraudulently Acquiring Documents Relating to Naturalization,
Citizenship, or Legal Resident Status for Own Use; False Personation or
Fraudulent Marriage by Alien to Evade Immigration Law; Fraudulently
Acquiring or Improperly Using a United States Passport); (G)(1)
proposed amendment to Sec. 2B2.3 (Trespass) to implement the Respect
for America's Fallen Heroes Act, Pub. L. 109-228; (2) proposed
amendment to Sec. 2H3.1 to implement the Violence Against Women and
Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-162; and
(3) issue for comment regarding implementation of the SAFE Port Act,
Pub. L. 109-347; (H) proposed amendment to (1) Sec. Sec. 2B1.1,
2D1.11, 2K2.1 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or Transportation of
Firearms or Ammunition; Prohibited Transactions Involving Firearms or
Ammunition), and 2L1.1 to correct typographical errors; and (2) Chapter
Three, Part D (Introductory Commentary) and Sec. 3D1.1 (Procedure for
Determining Offense Level on Multiple Counts) to address cases
involving multiple counts contained in multiple indictments; (I)
[[Page 4373]]
issue for comment regarding Sec. 1B1.13 (Reduction in Term of
Imprisonment as a Result of Motion by Director of Bureau of Prisons);
(J) issues for comment regarding application of certain criminal
history rules under Sec. 4A1.2 (Definitions and Instructions for
Computing Criminal History); (K) issue for comment regarding
implementation of section 4 of the Telephone Records and Privacy
Protection Act of 2006, Pub. L. 109-476, which provides the Commission
with emergency amendment authority to amend the guidelines applicable
to persons convicted of an offense under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1039; and (L)
issue for comment regarding federal cocaine sentencing policy.
DATES: (A) Proposed Amendments.--Written public comment regarding the
proposed amendments and issues for comment set forth in this notice,
including public comment regarding retroactive application of any of
the proposed amendments, should be received by the Commission not later
than March 30, 2007.
(B) Public Hearing.--The Commission will be scheduling a public
hearing on its proposed amendments. Further information regarding the
public hearing, including requirements for testifying and providing
written testimony, as well as the date of the hearing, will be provided
by the Commission on its Web site at www.ussc.gov.
ADDRESSES: Public comment should be sent to: United States Sentencing
Commission, One Columbus Circle, NE., Suite 2-500, Washington, DC
20002-8002, Attention: Public Affairs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Courlander, Public Affairs
Officer, Telephone: (202) 502-4597.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Sentencing Commission is
an independent agency in the judicial branch of the United States
Government. The Commission promulgates sentencing guidelines and policy
statements for federal courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a). The
Commission also periodically reviews and revises previously promulgated
guidelines pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(o) and submits guideline
amendments to the Congress not later than the first day of May of each
year pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(p).
The Commission seeks comment on the proposed amendments, issues for
comment, and any other aspect of the sentencing guidelines, policy
statements, and commentary. In addition to the issues for comment
presented in the proposed amendments, the Commission requests comment
regarding simplification of the guidelines. Specifically, with respect
to the guidelines that are the subject of the following proposed
amendments, should the Commission make additional amendments to
simplify those guidelines and, if so, how?
The Commission also requests public comment regarding whether the
Commission should specify for retroactive application to previously
sentenced defendants any of the proposed amendments published in this
notice. The Commission requests comment regarding which, if any, of the
proposed amendments that may result in a lower guideline range should
be made retroactive to previously sentenced defendants pursuant to
Sec. 1B1.10 (Reduction in Term of Imprisonment as a Result of Amended
Guideline Range).
The proposed amendments in this notice are presented in one of two
formats. First, some of the amendments are proposed as specific
revisions to a guideline or commentary. Bracketed text within a
proposed amendment indicates a heightened interest on the Commission's
part in comment and suggestions regarding alternative policy choices;
for example, a proposed enhancement of [2] [4] [6] levels indicates
that the Commission is considering, and invites comment on, alternative
policy choices regarding the appropriate level of enhancement.
Similarly, bracketed text within a specific offense characteristic or
application note means that the Commission specifically invites comment
on whether the proposed provision is appropriate. Second, the
Commission has highlighted certain issues for comment and invites
suggestions on how the Commission should respond to those issues.
Additional information pertaining to the proposed amendments
described in this notice may be accessed through the Commission's Web
site at www.ussc.gov.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. Sec. 994(a), (o), (p), (x); USSC Rules of
Practice and Procedure, Rule 4.4.
Ricardo H. Hinojosa,
Chair.
1. Transportation
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment: This proposed amendment implements
a number of provisions of the USA PATRIOT Improvement and
Reauthorization Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-177 (hereinafter ``PATRIOT
Act'') and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation
Equity Act: A Legacy for Users, Pub. L. 109-59 (hereinafter ``SAFETEA-
LU''). The proposed amendments also provide a corresponding amendment
to Appendix A (Statutory Index). Specifically:
(A) Section 110 of the PATRIOT Act strikes 18 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.
1992 and 1993 and creates a new section 1992 (Terrorist attacks and
other violence against railroad carriers and against mass
transportation systems on land, on water, or through the air). The
legislation creates a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of 20
years and includes a penalty of imprisonment for any years or life or,
if the offense resulted in the death of any person, the defendant may
be sentenced to death. There are exceptions to the life and death
sentences for cases of surveillance, conveying false information, or
attempting, threatening, or conspiring to engage in any violation under
this section. The statute also contains aggravated offenses. First, a
sentence of life or death may be imposed when the offense involved
railroad on-track equipment or a mass transportation vehicle carrying a
passenger or employee, or carrying hazardous material, or both. Second,
a life or death sentence may be given if the offense was committed with
the intent to endanger the safety of any person, or with a reckless
disregard for the safety of any person, when the railroad on-track
equipment or mass transportation vehicle was carrying a defined
hazardous material at the time of the offense.
The proposed amendment updates all references to 18 U.S.C. 1992 and
eliminates all references to 18 U.S.C. 1993. The proposed amendment
also adds 18 U.S.C. 1992 to the referenced statutory provisions in
Sec. Sec. 2A1.1 (First Degree Murder), 2A2.1 (Assault with Intent to
Commit Murder; Attempted Murder), and 2A5.2 (Interference with Flight
Crew Member or Flight Attendant; Interference with Dispatch, Operation,
or Maintenance of Mass Transportation Vehicle or a Ferry).
Additionally, the amendment adjusts the definition of ``mass
transportation'' in Sec. Sec. 2A1.4, 2A5.2, and 2K1.4 (Arson; Property
Damage by Use of Explosives) to reflect the new defining section, 18
U.S.C. 1992(d)(7). Also proposed is the addition of ``Navigation'' to
the title and text of Sec. 2A5.2 to better reflect the full scope of
the newly created 18 U.S.C. 1992.
(B) Section 302 of the PATRIOT Act increases the scope of 18 U.S.C.
1036 (Entry by false pretenses to any real property, vessel, or
aircraft of the United States or secure area of any airport) by
[[Page 4374]]
adding to the areas protected from illegal entry under this title
secure and restricted areas of a seaport. Section 302 also increases
the statutory maximum penalty from five years to ten years.
The proposed amendment refers this offense to Sec. 2B2.3(b)(1) and
adds seaports to the list of protected areas warranting a two-level
enhancement. The amendment also adds a definition for ``seaport'', as
one does not currently exist in the guidelines.
(C) Section 303 of the PATRIOT Act adds a new offense at 18 U.S.C.
2237 (Criminal sanctions for failure to heave to, obstruction of
boarding, or providing false information). This new statute makes it a
crime to refuse to stop a vessel in violation of a federal law
enforcement officer's order or to provide materially false information
to a federal law enforcement officer during a boarding of a vessel.
The proposed amendment references this new offense to Sec. Sec.
2A2.4 (Obstructing or Impeding Officers) and 2B1.1 (Fraud, Theft, and
Property Damage).
(D) Section 306 of the PATRIOT Act provides new offenses in 18
U.S.C. 2291 (Destruction of vessel or maritime facility) and 2292
(Imparting or conveying false information). Section 2291 of title 18,
United States Code, covers the destruction of vessels and maritime
facilities and creates a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of 20
years. If the conduct under this section involves a vessel carrying
nuclear or radioactive waste, a statutory maximum life sentence
applies, and if death results, a life or death sentence is possible.
Section 2292 of title 18, United States Code, prohibits providing false
information regarding an attempt or alleged attempt to commit a crime
and provides a statutory maximum sentence of five years.
The proposed amendment references 18 U.S.C. 2291 to 2A1.1 (First
Degree Murder), 2A1.2 (Second Degree Murder), 2A1.3 (Voluntary
Manslaughter), 2A1.4 (Involuntary Manslaughter), 2A2.1 (Assault with
Intent to Commit Murder; Attempted Murder), 2A2.2 (Aggravated Assault),
2A2.3 (Minor Assault), 2A6.1 (Threatening or Harrassing Communications;
Hoaxes), 2B1.1 (Fraud, Theft, and Property Damage), 2K1.4 (Arson;
Property Damage by Use of Explosives) and 2M6.1 (Nuclear, Biological,
and Chemical Weapons, and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction). Section
2292 of title 18, United States Code, is referenced to Sec. 2A6.1.
(E) Section 307(c) of the PATRIOT Act directs the Commission to
review the guidelines to determine whether a sentencing enhancement is
appropriate for any offense under sections 659 or 2311 of title 18,
United States Code.
The proposed amendment provides two options to respond to this
directive. Option 1 amends Sec. 2B1.1(b)(4) to provide an alternative
enhancement if the defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C. 659. An
issue for comment also requests input regarding whether any such
enhancement should include convictions under 18 U.S.C. 2312 and 2313.
Option 2 responds to the directive by revising Sec. 2B1.1(b)(11).
Currently this section provides a minimum offense level of 14 for
offenses involving an organized scheme to steal vehicles or vehicle
parts. The proposed amendment adds convictions under 18 U.S.C. 659 to
this section and also provides a two-level increase for all cases
covered under the subsection.
(F) Section 308 of the PATRIOT Act increases the statutory maximum
penalties for 18 U.S.C. 2199 (Stowaways on vessels or aircraft). Absent
any aggravating factors, the statutory maximum for offenses is
increased from one year to five years. Section 308 adds a statutory
maximum of 20 years if a person acts with the intent to commit serious
bodily injury and serious bodily injury occurs. For offenses involving
the intent to kill and death occurs, section 308 also adds a penalty of
imprisonment for any term of years, including life or death.
The proposed amendment references 18 U.S.C. 2199 to 2A1.1 (First
Degree Murder), 2A1.2 (Second Degree Murder), 2A1.3 (Voluntary
Manslaughter), 2A1.4 (Involuntary Manslaughter), 2A2.1 (Assault with
Intent to Commit Murder; Attempted Murder), 2A2.2 (Aggravated Assault),
and 2A2.3 (Minor Assault).
(G) Section 4210 of SAFETEA-LU creates a new offense at 49 U.S.C.
14915 for failure to release household goods with a statutory maximum
of two years.
The proposed amendment references this section to Sec. 2B1.1 as it
is the most analogous guideline.
(H) Section 4102(b) of SAFETEA-LU creates a new criminal violation
for violating a commercial motor vehicle's out-of-service order. The
offense carries a statutory maximum of one year.
The proposed amendment references this section to Sec. 2X5.2
(Class A Misdemeanor (Not Covered by Another Specific Offense
Guideline)).
The proposed amendment also includes five issues for comment
pertaining to the following:
(1) Section 7121 of SAFETEA-LU creates a new aggravated felony
under 49 U.S.C. 5124 that carries a statutory maximum of 10 years when
conduct under the section results in the release of a hazardous
material that causes bodily injury or death. Appendix A (Statutory
Index) currently references 49 U.S.C. 5124 to Sec. 2Q1.2 (Mishandling
of Hazardous or Toxic Substances or Pesticides; Recordkeeping,
Tampering, and Falsification; Unlawfully Transporting Hazardous
Materials in Commerce). An issue for comment asks whether penalties
under Sec. 2Q1.2 are adequate for the new offense.
(2) The proposed amendment adds seaports to the two-level
enhancement in Sec. 2B2.3(b)(1). Section 2B2.3(c) also provides a
cross reference if the offense was committed with the intent to commit
another criminal offense. An issue for comment asks whether, as an
alternative to the cross reference provision and as a possible means of
simplifying this guideline, it should amend Sec. 2B2.3 (Trespass) to
provide instead a general specific offense characteristic for any
trespass offense that was committed with the intent to commit another
offense.
(3) Section 309 of the PATRIOT Act creates a new offense at 18
U.S.C. 226 (Bribery affecting port security), making it a crime to
knowingly, and with the intent to commit international or domestic
terrorism, bribe a public official to affect port security. It is also
a crime under this section to be the recipient of such a bribe in
return for being influenced in the performance of public duties
affecting port security with the knowledge that such influence will be
used to commit or plan to commit an act of terrorism.
The proposed amendment references 18 U.S.C. 226 to Sec. 2C1.1
(Offering, Giving, Soliciting, or Receiving a Bribe; Extortion Under
Color of Official Right; Fraud Involving the Deprivation of the
Intangible Right to Honest Services of Public Official; Conspiracy to
Defraud by Interference with Governmental Functions).
An issue for comment addresses this proposed reference to Sec.
2C1.1 as well as the operation of the cross reference in Sec.
2C1.1(c)(1) in cases involving an intent to commit an act of
international or domestic terrorism.
(4) Whether the Commission should use the term ``mass
transportation'' or ``public transportation'' in the context of Sec.
2A5.2 and other guidelines.
(5) The proposed amendment provides options for increasing
penalties for offenses under 18 U.S.C. 659. An issue for comment asks
whether the Commission also should provide similar increases for
offenses under 18 U.S.C. 2312 (Transportation of stolen vehicles) and
2313 (Sale or receipt of stolen vehicles).
[[Page 4375]]
Proposed Amendment
The Commentary to Sec. 2A1.1 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``1992(a)(7),'' after ``1841(a)(2)(C),''; and by
inserting ``2199, 2291,'' after ``2118(c)(2),''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A1.2 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``2199, 2291,'' after ``1841(a)(2)(C),''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A1.3 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``2199, 2291,'' after ``1841(a)(2)(C),''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A1.4 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``2199, 2291,'' after ``1841(a)(2)(C),''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A1.4 captioned ``Application Note'' is
amended in Note 1 by striking ``18 U.S.C. 1993(c)(5)'' and inserting
``18 U.S.C. 1992(d)(7)''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A2.1 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by striking ``1993(a)(6)'' and inserting ``1992(a)(7), 2199,
2291''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A2.2 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by striking ``1993(a)(6)'' and inserting ``1992(a)(7), 2199,
2291''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A2.3 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``, 2199, 2291'' after ``1751(e)''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A2.4 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``2237(a)(1), (a)(2)(A),'' after ``1502,''.
Section 2A5.2 is amended in the heading by inserting
``Navigation,'' after ``Dispatch,''; and by striking ``or Ferry''.
Sections 2A5.2(a)(1) and (a)(2) are amended by striking the comma
after ``facility'' each place it appears and inserting ``or''; and by
striking ``, or a ferry'' each place it appears.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A5.2 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by striking ``1993(a)(4), (5), (6), (b);'' and inserting
``1992(a)(1), (a)(4), (a)(5), (a)(6);''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A5.2 captioned ``Application Note'' is
amended in Note 1 in the last paragraph by striking ``18 U.S.C.
1993(c)(5)'' and inserting ``18 U.S.C. 1992(d)(7)''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A6.1 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by striking ``1993(a)(7), (8),'' and inserting ``1992(a)(9),
(a)(10), 2291(a)(8), 2291(e), 2292,''.
[Option 1 (Section 659 offenses)
Section 2B1.1 is amended in subsection (b)(4) by inserting ``(A)''
before ``offense involved''; and by striking ``property, increase'' and
inserting ``; or (B) defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C. Sec.
increase''.]
The Commentary to Sec. 2B1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 5 by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(b)(4)'' each place it
appears.]
[Option 2 (Section 659 offenses) Section 2B1.1 is amended in
subsection (b)(11) by inserting ``(A)'' before ``offense involved'';
and by striking ``, and'' and inserting ``; or (B) defendant was
convicted under 18 U.S.C. 659, increase by 2 levels. If''.]
The Commentary to Sec. 2B1.1 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``(a)(1), (a)(5)'' after ``1992''; by striking
``1993(a)(1), (a)(4),''; by inserting ``2291,'' after ``2113(b),''; and
by inserting ``14915,'' after ``49 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. ''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2B1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended by striking Note 10 and inserting the following:
``10. Application of Subsection (b)(11).--Subsection (b)(11)
provides a minimum offense level in the case of an ongoing,
sophisticated operation (such as an auto theft ring or 'chop shop') to
steal vehicles or vehicle parts, or to receive stolen vehicles or
vehicle parts. This subsection also applies if the defendant was
convicted of cargo theft under 18 U.S.C. 659. For purposes of this
subsection, 'vehicle' means motor vehicle, vessel, or aircraft.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2B1.1 captioned ``Background'' is amended
in the paragraph that begins ``A minimum offense level of level 14'' by
striking ``Therefore, the'' and inserting ``The''; by inserting ``in
subsection (b)(11)(A)'' after ``is used''; and by adding at the end the
following:
``The minimum offense level also applies to convictions under 18
U.S.C. 659 for offenses involving cargo theft. Subsection (b)(11)(B)
implements the directive in section 307 of Public Law 109-177.''.]
Section 2B2.3 is amended in subsection (b)(1) by striking
``secured'' each place it appears and inserting ``secure''; by
redesignating subdivisions (E) and (F) as subdivisions (F) and (G),
respectively; and by inserting the following after ``airport;'':
``(E) in a secure area within a seaport;''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2B2.3 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``, 2199'' after ``1036''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2B2.3 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 1 by adding at the end the following:
`` `Seaport' has the meaning given that term in 18 U.S.C. 26.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2B2.3 captioned ``Background'' is amended
by striking ``, such as nuclear facilities,'' and inserting ``(such as
nuclear facilities) and other locations (such as airports and
seaports)''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2C1.1 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``226,'' after ``Sec. Sec. 201(b)(1), (2),''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2K1.4 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(4)'' after ``1992''; by
striking ``1993(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), (b),''; and by inserting
``2291,'' after ``2275''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2K1.4 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 1 by striking ``18 U.S.C. 1993(c)(5)'' and inserting
``18 U.S.C. 1992(d)(7)''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2M6.1 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by striking ``1993(a)(2), (3), (b), 2332a (only with respect to
weapons of mass destruction as defined in 18 U.S.C. 2332a(c)(2)(B),
(C), and (D))'' and inserting ``1992(a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(4), (b)(2),
2291,''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2Q1.1 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``18 U.S.C. 1992(b)(3);'' before ``33 U.S.C.
1319(c)(3);''.
Section 2X1.1 is amended in subsection (d)(1)(A) by inserting
``(a)(1)-(a)(7), (a)(9), (a)(10)'' after ``1992;''; and in subsection
(d)(1)(B) by inserting ``and'' after ``Sec. 32;''; and by striking
``18 U.S.C. 1993; and''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2X5.2 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by inserting ``; 49 U.S.C. 31310'' after ``14133''.
Appendix A (Statutory Index) is amended by inserting after the line
referenced to 18 U.S.C. 225 the following:
``18 U.S.C. 226 2C1.1''; by inserting after the line referenced to
18 U.S.C. 1035 the following:
``18 U.S.C. 1036 2B2.3''; by striking the line referenced to 18
U.S.C. 1992 through the end of the line referenced to 18 U.S.C. 1993(b)
and inserting the following:
``18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(1)--2A5.2, 2B1.1, 2K1.4, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(2)--2K1.4, 2M6.1, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(3)--2M6.1, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(4)--2A5.2, 2K1.4, 2M6.1, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(5)--2A5.2, 2B1.1, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(6)--2A5.2, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(7)--2A1.1, 2A2.1, 2A2.2, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(8)--2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(9)--2A6.1, 2X1.1
18 U.S.C. 1992(a)(10)--2A6.1, 2X1.1'';
in the line referenced to 18 U.S.C. 2199 by inserting ``2A1.1, 2A1.2,
2A1.3,
[[Page 4376]]
2A1.4, 2A2.1, 2A2.2, 2A2.3,'' before ``2B1.1''; by inserting after the
line referenced to 18 U.S.C. 2233 the following:
``18 U.S.C. 2237(a)(1), (a)(2)(A)--2A2.4
18 U.S.C. 2237(a)(2)(B)--2B1.1'';
by inserting after the line referenced to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2281 the
following:
``18 U.S.C. 2291--2A1.1, 2A1.2, 2A1.3, 2A1.4, 2A2.1, 2A2.2, 2A2.3,
2A6.1, 2B1.1, 2K1.4, 2M6.1
18 U.S.C. 2292--2A6.1'';
by inserting after the line referenced to 49 U.S.C. 14912'' the
following:
``49 U.S.C. 14915--2B1.1''; and
by inserting after the line referenced to 49 U.S.C. 30170'' the
following:
``49 U.S.C. 31310--2X5.2''.
Issues for Comment
1. The SAFETEA-LU Act, Pub. L. 109-59, amended 49 U.S.C. 5124 to
provide a new aggravated felony, with a 10-year statutory maximum term
of imprisonment, for cases involving a release of a hazardous material
that results in death or bodily injury. Appendix A (Statutory Index)
references 49 U.S.C. Sec. 5124 to Sec. 2Q1.2 (Mishandling of
Hazardous or Toxic Substances or Pesticides; Recordkeeping, Tampering,
and Falsification; Unlawfully Transporting Hazardous Materials in
Commerce). In 2004 the Commission amended Sec. 2Q1.2 to provide a two-
level enhancement in Sec. 2Q1.2(b)(7) for defendants convicted of 49
U.S.C. 5124 or 46312 because ``[t]hese offenses pose an inherent risk
to large populations in a manner not typically associated with other
pollution offenses sentenced under the same guideline. See USSG App. C
(Amendment 672) (effective Nov. 1, 2004). In addition to application of
Sec. 2Q1.2(b)(7), a defendant convicted of 49 U.S.C. 5124 likely would
receive a four-level enhancement under Sec. 2Q1.2(b)(1)(B) for a
release of a hazardous substance (because the offense of conviction
necessarily involves such a release) and a nine-level enhancement for
the substantial likelihood of death or serious bodily injury under
Sec. 2Q1.2(b)(2). When added to the Base Offense Level of 8, the
minimum offense level under Sec. 2Q1.2 would be level 23 (46-57 months
at CHC I). Further, Application Note 6 states that an upward departure
would be warranted in any case in which death or serious bodily injury
results. The Commission requests comment regarding whether Sec. 2Q1.2
currently provides adequate penalties for a defendant convicted under
49 U.S.C. 5124. If not, how should the Commission amend Sec. 2Q1.2 to
address adequately these offenses? For example, should the Commission
provide an enhancement greater than two levels for such offenses?
Should the Commission provide a minimum offense level for 49 U.S.C.
5124 offenses that actually result in death or serious bodily injury?
2. The USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act of 2005,
Public Law 109-177, amended 18 U.S.C. 1036 to add seaports to the list
of covered locations and to increase the statutory maximum term of
imprisonment from 5 years to 10 years. The proposed amendment adds
seaports to the two-level enhancement in Sec. 2B2.3(b)(1). Section
2B2.3 (Trespass) also provides a cross reference in subsection (c) if
the offense was committed with the intent to commit a felony offense.
The Commission requests comment regarding whether, as an alternative to
the cross reference provision, and as a possible means of simplifying
this guideline, it should amend Sec. 2B2.3 to provide instead a
general specific offense characteristic for any trespass offense that
was committed with the intent to commit a felony. If so, how many
levels would be appropriate? Should the Commission consider amending
Sec. 2B2.3(b)(1) to provide an additional increase if the trespass on
any of the enumerated locations was committed with the intent to commit
a felony offense?
3. The USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act provided a
new offense at 18 U.S.C. 226 for bribery affecting port security. The
provision criminalizes bribery with the intent to commit international
terrorism or domestic terrorism and provides a statutory maximum term
of imprisonment of 15 years. In general, the guidelines reference
bribery offenses to Sec. 2C1.1 (Offering, Giving, Soliciting, or
Receiving a Bribe; Extortion Under Color of Official Right; Fraud
Involving the Deprivation of the Intangible Right to Honest Services of
Public Officials; Conspiracy to Defraud by Interference with
Governmental Functions), which provides alternative base offense levels
of 14, if the defendant was public official, or 12, otherwise. Section
2C1.1(c)(1) provides a cross reference if the offense was committed for
the purpose of facilitating the commission of another criminal offense
(and the guideline applicable to a conspiracy to commit that other
offense results in a greater offense level than Sec. 2C1.1). The
Commission requests comment regarding whether it should reference 18
U.S.C. Sec. 226 to Sec. 2C1.1 and, if so, whether the cross reference
provision is a sufficient means of handling bribery cases involving an
intent to commit an act of international or domestic terrorism. If the
offense is referenced to Sec. 2C1.1, should the Commission, as an
alternative to the cross reference provision and as a possible means of
simplifying this guideline, provide a specific offense characteristic
for convictions of 18 U.S.C. 226 that results in an offense level
proportionate to other terrorism-related offenses (e.g., providing a
minimum offense level of 26 would provide parity with offenses
sentenced under Sec. 2M5.3 (Providing Material Support or Resources to
Designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations or for a Terrorist
Purpose)). Alternatively, should the Commission reference 18 U.S.C. 226
to 2M5.3?
4. In addition to consolidating 18 U.S.C. 1992 and 1993, the USA
PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act replaced the term ``public
transportation'' (added by the SAFETEA-LU Act) with ``mass
transportation'' (the term used in 18 U.S.C. 1992 prior to SAFETEA-LU).
``Mass transportation'' now is defined at 18 U.S.C. 1992(d)(7) to have
the same meaning as ``public transportation'' (defined at 49 U.S.C.
5302(a)(7)) except that, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1992, ``mass
transportation'' includes school bus, charter, sightseeing
transportation, and passenger vessel. School bus and charter are
otherwise expressly excluded from the definition of ``public
transportation'' as are intercity bus transportation and intercity
passenger rail transportation. The Commission requests comment
regarding the appropriate term to use in the context of Sec. 2A5.2
(Interference with Flight Crew Member or Flight Attendant; Interference
with Dispatch, Operation, or Maintenance of Mass Transportation Vehicle
or a Ferry). Specifically, should the Commission use ``mass
transportation'' as that term is now defined by 18 U.S.C. 1992(d)(7)
(i.e., including school bus, charter, sightseeing transportation and
passenger vessel) or use the more limited term ``public
transportation'' (i.e., excluding school bus, charter, intercity bus
transportation, and intercity passenger rail transportation)?
5. The proposed amendment provides 2 options for amending Sec.
2B1.1 to address 18 U.S.C. 659 (Cargo theft). The Commission requests
comment regarding whether, rather than an enhancement based on the
statute of conviction, it ought to provide an enhancement based on real
offense conduct such as if the offense involved cargo theft. The
Commission also requests comment regarding whether it
[[Page 4377]]
should provide an enhancement for conduct covered by convictions under
18 U.S.C. 2312 (Transportation of stolen vehicles) and 2313 (Sale or
receipt of stolen vehicles), either as part of the proposed enhancement
for 18 U.S.C. 659 offenses or as a separate enhancement.
2. Sex Offenses
Synopsis of Proposed Amendment: This multi-part proposed amendment
implements the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006,
Public Law 109-248. Part I of this proposed amendment implements the
directive in section 141 of the Act pertaining to the new offense in 18
U.S.C. 2250 for failure to register as a sex offender. The directive
instructs the Commission, in promulgating guidelines for use of a
sentencing court in determining the sentence to be imposed for [18
U.S.C. 2250], to consider the following matters:
(1) Whether the person committed another sex offense in connection
with, or during, the period for which the person failed to register.
(2) Whether the person committed an offense against a minor in
connection with, or during, the period for which the person failed to
register.
(3) Whether the person voluntarily attempted to correct the failure
to register.
(4) The seriousness of the offense which gave rise to the
requirement to register, including whether such offense is a tier I,
tier II, or tier III offense, as those terms are defined in section 111
[of the Act].
(5) Whether the person has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent
for any offense other than the offense which gave rise to the
requirement to register.
Section 2250 of title 18, United States Code, provides a statutory
maximum term of imprisonment of ten years for the failure to register.
There is an additional mandatory consecutive term of 5 years'
imprisonment applicable if a person commits a crime of violence while
in failure to register status (18 U.S.C. 2250(c)). The requirements
pertaining to who must register, where the registration must occur, and
for how long are set forth in 42 U.S.C. 16911.
The proposed amendment provides a new guideline in Sec. 2A3.5
(Failure to Register as a Sex Offender). The proposed amendment
presents two options for addressing the fourth matter of the directive.
Option One provides multiple base offense levels based on the category
of offense that gave rise to the registration requirement: level 16 if
the offense that gave rise to the requirement to register was a Tier
III offense; level 14 if the offense that gave rise to the requirement
to register was a Tier II offense; and level 12 if the offense that
gave rise to the requirement to register was a Tier I offense. Option
Two provides a base offense level of [12] and a specific offense
characteristic in Sec. 2A3.5(b)(1) providing a two-level increase if
the offense that gave rise to the requirement to register was a Tier II
offense and a four-level increase if the offense that gave rise to the
requirement to register was a Tier III offense. The resulting offense
level under either option is the same for each tier of offense. The
definitions for Tier I, II, and III offenses are the statutory
definitions provided in 42 U.S.C. 16911(2), (3), and (4), respectively.
The first and second matters are addressed in Sec. 2A3.5(b)(1) of
Option One, and in Sec. 2A3.5(b)(2) of Option Two. Both options
provide alternative increases based on the type of offense committed
while in a failure to register status and on whether that offense was
committed against a minor or an adult. The proposed amendment provides
a 6-level increase if, while in a failure to register status, the
defendant committed a sex offense against an adult, or kidnapped or
falsely imprisoned a minor. If the defendant committed a sex offense
against a minor, the proposed amendment provides an 8-level increase
and a minimum offense level of [24]-[28].
The third matter is addressed in Sec. 2A3.5(b)(2) in Option One,
and in Sec. 2A3.5(b)(3) in Option Two. Both options provide a [2][4]-
level decrease if the defendant voluntarily attempted to correct the
failure to register.
Issues for comment 2 and 3 in Part V of the
proposed amendment request comment regarding the scope of these
proposed enhancements. Issue for comment 3 also asks whether
the Commission should include an instruction that the reduction does
not apply if any of the proposed specific offense characteristics also
apply.
The proposed amendment does not specifically address the fifth
matter because application of Chapter Four will take into account
whether the person has been convicted or adjudicated delinquent for any
offense other than the offense which gave rise to the requirement to
register.
The proposed amendment also provides another new guideline for
certain aggravated offenses related to the requirement to register as a
sex offender. As noted previously, 18 U.S.C. 2250(c) provides a
mandatory consecutive term of 5 years if a crime of violence was
committed while the defendant was in a failure to register status.
Section 2260A of title 18, United States Code, provides a mandatory
consecutive term of 10 years' imprisonment if a person who is required
to register commits an enumerated offense (including kidnapping, human
trafficking, and various sex offenses). The new guideline, Sec. 2A3.6
(Aggravated Offenses Relating to Registration as a Sex Offender), will
apply to convictions under 18 U.S.C. 2250(c) or 2260A, and instructs
the court that the guideline sentence for any such conviction is the
term of imprisonment required by statute. Neither Chapters Three nor
Four will apply to any count of conviction covered by this guideline.
This approach is the same approach the Commission has taken with other
statutes that provide mandatory consecutive terms of imprisonment,
namely 18 U.S.C. 1028A (see Sec. 2B1.6 (Aggravated Identity Theft) and
18 U.S.C. 924(c) (See Sec. 2K2.4 (Use of Firearm, Armor-Piercing
Ammunition, or Explosive During or in Relation to Certain Crimes).)
Part II implements other new offenses and increased penalties as
follows:
(A) The Act provides a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 30
years for convictions under 18 U.S.C. 2241(c) (Aggravated sexual abuse
with children). This statute covers crossing state lines to engage in
the sexual abuse of a child under the age of 12 years. It also covers
engaging in a sexual act under the circumstances described in 18 U.S.C.
2241(a) and (b) (force, threat, or other means) with a child who is
between the ages of 12 years and 16 years and is at least four years
younger than the person who is engaging in the sexual act. The proposed
amendment provides a base offense level of [40] in Sec. 2A3.1
(Criminal Sexual Abuse; Attempt to Commit Criminal Sexual Abuse) if the
defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C. 2241(c). The specific offense
characteristic for the age of the victim, subsection (b)(2), would not
apply because the higher base offense level takes into account the age
of the victim. There also is an application note that instructs the
court not to apply the enhancement in Sec. 2A3.1(b)(1) (four-level
enhancement if the offense involved conduct described in 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 2241(a) or (b)) if the basis for the conviction under 18 U.S.C.
2241(c) is that the defendant engaged in conduct described in 18 U.S.C.
2241(a) or (b).
(B) The Act increased the statutory maximum term of imprisonment
for convictions under 18 U.S.C. 2243(b) for sexual abuse of a ward from
five years to 15 years. The proposed amendment proposes to increase the
base offense level in Sec. 2A3.3 (Criminal Sexual Abuse
[[Page 4378]]
of a Ward or Attempt to Commit Such Acts) to level [14][16][18][20].
(C) The Act created a new offense in 18 U.S.C. 2244(a)(5) for
sexual contact offenses that would have violated 18 U.S.C. 2241(c) had
the sexual contact been a sexual act. (Section 2241(c) covers sexual
acts with a child under 12 years old or sexual acts involving conduct
described in 18 U.S.C. 2241(a) or (b) with a child between the ages of
12 and 16 and who is at least four years younger than the defendant.)
The offense has a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of life.
The proposed amendment addresses this new offense by increasing the
minimum offense level in the age enhancement in subsection Sec.
2A3.4(b)(1) from level 20 to level 22.
Issue for Comment 4 in Part V of the proposed amendment
addresses whether Sec. 2A3.4 already adequately accounts for the new
offense and therefore does not need to be amended.
(D) The Act amended 18 U.S.C. 1591 (sex trafficking of children or
by force, fraud, or coercion) to provide a mandatory minimum term of
imprisonment of 15 years if the sex trafficking offense involved a
minor who had not attained the age of 14 years or involved force,
fraud, or coercion (subsection 1591(b)(1)) and a mandatory minimum of
10 years if the offense involved a minor who had attained the age of 14
years but had not attained the age of 18 years (subsection 1591(b)(2)).
The Act also increased the statutory maximum term of imprisonment from
40 years to life for 18 U.S.C. 1591(b)(2) offenses.
To address the increased statutory minimums, the proposed amendment
modifies the base offense levels in Sec. Sec. 2G1.1 (Promoting a
Commercial Sex Act or Prohibited Sexual Conduct with an Individual
Other than a Minor) and 2G1.3 (Promoting a Commercial Sex Act or
Prohibited Sexual Conduct with a Minor; Transportation of Minors to
Engage in a Commercial Sex Act or Prohibited Sexual Conduct).
With respect to offenses involving force, fraud, or coercion, the
proposed amendment would create a heightened base offense level of
[34][36] in Sec. 2G1.1 if the offense of conviction is 18 U.S.C. 1591
and the offense involved conduct described in subsection (b)(1) of that
statute. An alternative base offense level of 14 would apply in all
other cases. The proposed amendment also excludes application of the
enhancement in Sec. 2G1.1(b)(1) to cases that are sentenced under
Sec. 2G1.1(a)(1) because cases to which that base offense level apply
necessarily involve fraud or coercion.
With respect to offenses involving minors, the proposed amendment
would create alternative base offense levels in Sec. 2G1.3 based on
the statute of conviction and the conduct described in that conviction.
For convictions under 18 U.S.C. 1591 in which the offense involved
conduct described in subsection (b)(1) of that statute (i.e., offense
was effected by force, fraud, or coercion, or involved a minor who had
not attained the age of 14 years), the proposed base offense level is
[34][36]. For convictions under 18 U.S.C. 1591 in which the offense
involved conduct described in subsection (b)(2) of that statute (i.e.,
offense involved a minor who had attained the age of 14 but had not
attained the age of 18 years), the proposed base offense level is
[30][32].
The Act also increased the penalties for 18 U.S.C. 2422(b)
(Coercion and enticement [of a minor to engage in criminal sexual
activity]) and 2423(a) (Transportation [of a minor] with intent to
engage in criminal sexual activity). Both statutes now have a mandatory
minimum term of 10 years (increased from 5 years) and a statutory
maximum term of imprisonment of life (increased from 30 years). The
proposed amendment would add Sec. 2G1.3(a)(3) with a base offense
level of [28][30] if the defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C.
2422(b) or 2423(a). If the Commission decides that the base offense
level should be the same for offenses under 18 U.S.C. 1591(b)(2),
2422(b), and 2423(a), then the Team would modify the proposed amendment
to consolidate these offenses into one base offense level.
The proposed amendment also provides a range of [4]-[8] at Sec.
2G1.3(b)(5). It also addresses the interaction of subsection (b)(5),
which provides an 8-level increase if the offense involved a minor who
had not attained the age of 12 years, and the proposed addition of
alternative base offense levels. Now that age is a factor the court
considers in determining the appropriate base offense level for
convictions under 18 U.S.C. 1591, the proposed amendment provides a new
application note that instructs the court not to apply subsection
(b)(5) if subsection (a)(1) applies. The proposed amendment also
provides an option for modifying the enhancement.
Issue for comment 8 asks whether the Commission should
consider providing an increase of four or six levels, instead of eight
levels, at Sec. 2G1.3(b)(5) in any case in which the age of the minor
victim is taken into account by base offense level.
(E) The Act created a new offense in 18 U.S.C. 2257A that imposes
recordkeeping requirements on individuals who produce depictions of
simulated sexually explicit conduct. Failure to comply with the
recordkeeping requirements carries a statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of 1 year. If the offense was intended to conceal a child
pornography offense, the statute provides a statutory maximum term of
imprisonment of 5 years for the first offense; for the second offense,
the penalty is a 2-year mandatory minimum and a statutory maximum of 10
years.
The proposed amendment references this new offense to Sec. 2G2.5
(Recordkeeping Offenses Involving the Production of Sexually Explicit
Materials; Failure to Provide Required Marks in Commercial Electronic
Email).
Issue for Comment 5 in Part V of the proposed amendment
requests comment regarding the refusal to allow inspection of records
in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2257(f)(5) or 2257A.
(F) The Act created a new offense in 18 U.S.C. 2252A(g) that
prohibits engaging in child exploitation enterprises, defined in the
statute as violating 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1591, 1201 (if the victim is a
minor), Chapter 109A (involving a minor), Chapter 110 (except for 18
U.S.C. 2257 and 2257A), or Chapter 117 (involving a minor), as part of
a series of felony violations constituting three or more separate
incidents and involving more than one victim, and committing those
offenses in concert with three or more other people. The statute
provides a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment of 20 years.
The proposed amendment creates a new guideline, Sec. 2G2.6 (Child
Exploitation Enterprises), to cover this new offense. The guideline
provides a base offense level of [34][35][36][37] and three specific
offense characteristics, based on the age of the victim (subsection
(b)(1)), whether the defendant was the parent or had some other
custodial care of the victim (subsection (b)(2)), and whether the
offense involved conduct described in 18 U.S.C. 2241(a) or (b)
(subsection (b)(3)).
Issue for Comment 6 requests comment regarding the base
offense level, the scope of the proposed specific offense
characteristics, and whether the Commission should consider other
conduct for purposes of providing additional specific offense
characteristics.
(G) The Act created a new offense in 18 U.S.C. 2252C that prohibits
knowingly embedding words or images into the source code of a Web site
with the intent to deceive a person into
[[Page 4379]]
viewing obscenity, or to deceive a minor into viewing material harmful
to minors. The statute carries a statutory maximum term of imprisonment
of 20 years if the offense involved a minor, or a maximum of 10 years,
otherwise. Application Note 2 proposes that the specific offense
characteristic at Sec. 2G3.1(b)(3) not apply for offenses under 18
U.S.C. 2252C.
The proposed amendment modifies subsection (b)(2) of Sec. 2G3.1
(Importing, Mailing, or Transporting Obscene Matter; Transferring
Obscene Matter to a Minor; Misleading Domain Names), which currently
provides a two-level enhancement if the offense involved misleading
domain names. The proposed amendment adds to this enhancement embedding
words or digital images on a Web site and also presents the option of
providing a four-level increase for this enhancement.
Issue for Comment 7 requests comment regarding whether the
Commission should provide an enhancement if the defendant intended to
deceive someone other than a minor into viewing obscenity.
Part III addresses other criminal provisions contained in the Act
as follows:
(A) The Act created a new Class A misdemeanor in 42 U.S.C. 16984
prohibiting the use of a child's fingerprints that were derived from a
program funded by federal grants to support voluntary fingerprinting of
children for any purpose other than providing the fingerprints to the
child's parents or guardian. The proposed amendment references this new
offense to Sec. 2H3.1.1 (Interception of Communications;
Eavesdropping; Disclosure of Tax Return Information) and provides a
base offense level of 6 for the offense. The heading of the guideline
also is amended to cover personal information of this sort.
The Act also created 42 U.S.C. 16962 prohibiting the improper
release of information obtained in fingerprint-based checks for the
background check of foster or adoptive parents or of a person employed
by, or considering employment with, a private or public educational
agency. The statute provides a statutory maximum term of imprisonment
of 10 years. The proposed amendment references this offense to Sec.
2H3.1 and such offenses will receive a base offense level of 9 under
Sec. 2H3.1(a)(1).
(B) The Act amended 18 U.S.C. 1001 to provide an enhanced penalty
of up to 8 years if the matter relates to an offense under 18 U.S.C.
1591 or Chapters 109A, 110, or 117 of title 18, United States Code. The
proposed amendment adds a [2]-[12] level enhancement in subsection
(b)(1)(C) of Sec. 2J1.2 (Obstruction of Justice) to cover such
conduct.
(C) The Act added 18 U.S.C. 1591 to the list in 18 U.S.C.
3559(e)(2) of repeated sex offenses committed against children that
require a mandatory life imprisonment. The proposed amendment adds 18
U.S.C. 1591 to the list of covered sex offenses in Application Note 2
of Sec. 4B1.5 (Repeat and Dangerous Sex Offender Against Minors).
Part IV addresses the probation and supervised release aspects of
the Act. First, the proposed amendment updates subsection (a)(9) of
Sec. 5B1.3 (Conditions of Probation) and subsection (a)(7) of Sec.
5D1.3 to include compliance with SORNA as one of the mandatory
conditions. Second, it adds to the list of ``special conditions'' in
Sec. Sec. 5B1.3(d) and 5D1.3(d) a condition requiring a sex offender
to submit to a search, as added to 18 U.S.C. 3563(b) and 3583(d) by the
Act. Third, the proposed amendment modifies Sec. 5D1.2 (Term of
Supervised Release) to add Chapter 109B and 18 U.S.C. 1201 and 1591 to
the definition of sex offense in Application Note 1 of that guideline.
Part V sets forth all of the issues for comment. In addition to the
specific issues noted in this synopsis, Issue for Comment 1
requests input regarding how the Commission should incorporate the
mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment created or increased by the
Adam Walsh Act and discusses four approaches for incorporating these
penalties.
Proposed Amendment
Part I--Implementing Directive Regarding 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2250 Offenses
Chapter Two, Part A, Subpart 3 is amended in the heading by adding
at the end ``AND OFFENSES RELATED TO REGISTRATION AS A SEX OFFENDER'';
and by adding at the end the following new guidelines and accompanying
commentary:
``Sec. 2A3.5. Failure to Register as a Sex Offender
Option 1:
[(a) Base Offense Level:
(1) 16, if the offense that gave rise to the requirement to
register was a Tier III offense;
(2) 14, if the offense that gave rise to the requirement to
register was a Tier II offense; or
(3) 12, if the offense that gave rise to the requirement to
register was a Tier I offense.
(b) Specific Offense Characteristics:
(1) If, while in a failure to register status, the defendant (A)(i)
committed a sex offense against someone other than a minor; or (ii)
kidnapped or falsely imprisoned a minor, increase by 6 levels; or (B)
committed a sex offense against a minor, increase by 8 levels. If the
offense level resulting from application of subdivision (B) is less
than level [24]-[28], increase to level [24]-[28].
(2) If the defendant voluntarily attempted to correct the failure
to register, decrease by [2][4]levels.]
Option 2:
[(a) Base Offense Level: 12
(b) Specific Offense Characteristics
(1) If the offense that gave rise to the requirement to register
was a (A) Tier II offense, increase by 2 levels; or (B) Tier III
offense, increase by 4 levels.
(2) If, while in a failure to register status, the defendant (A)(i)
committed a sex offense against a person other than a minor; or (ii)
kidnapped or falsely imprisoned a minor, increase by 6 levels; or (B)
committed a sex offense against a minor, increase by 8 levels. If the
offense level resulting from application of subdivision (B) is less
than level [24]-[28], increase to level [24]-[28].
(3) If the defendant voluntarily attempted to correct the failure
to register, decrease by [2][4] levels.]
Commentary
Statutory Provision: 18 U.S.C. 2250(a).
Application Note:
1. Definitions.--For purposes of this guideline:
`Minor' means (A) an individual who had not attained the age of 18
years; (B) an individual, whether fictitious or not, who a law
enforcement officer represented to a participant (i) had not attained
the age of 18 years; and (ii) could be provided for the purposes of
engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or (C) an undercover law
enforcement officer who represented to a participant that the officer
had not attained the age of 18 years.
`Sex offense' has the meaning given that term in 42 U.S.C. Sec.
16911(5), except that kidnapping and false imprisonment are not
included.
[`Tier I offense',] `tier II offense', and `tier III offense' have
the meaning given those terms in 42 U.S.C. Sec. 16911[(2)], (3) and
(4), respectively.
Sec. 2A3.6. Aggravated Offenses Relating to Registration as a Sex
Offender
(a) If the defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C. 2250(c) or Sec.
2260A, the guideline sentence is the term of imprisonment required by
statute. Chapters Three (Adjustments) and Four
[[Page 4380]]
(Criminal History and Criminal Livelihood) shall not apply to that
count of conviction.
Commentary
Statutory Provisions: 18 U.S.C. 2250(c), 2260A.
Application Notes:
1. In General.--Sections 2250(c) and 2260A of title 18, United
States Code, provide mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment that are
required to be imposed consecutively to other offenses. Accordingly,
the guideline sentence for a defendant convicted under either statute
is the term required by the statute.
2. Inapplicability of Chapters Three and Four.--Do not apply
Chapters Three (Adjustments) and Four (Criminal History and Criminal
Livelihood) to any offense sentenced under this guideline. Such
offenses are excluded from application of those chapters because the
guideline sentence for each offense is determined only by the relevant
statute. See Sec. Sec. 3D1.1 (Procedure for Determining Offense Level
on Multiple Counts) and 5G1.2 (Sentencing on Multiple Counts of
Conviction).''
Part II--Implementing New Sex Offenses and Increased Penalties
(A) New Mandatory Minimum for 18 U.S.C. 2241(c):
Section 2A3.1(a) is amended by striking ``30'' and inserting the
following:
``(1) 40, if the defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C. 2241(c);
or
(2) 30, otherwise.''.
Section 2A3.1(b)(2) is amended by striking ``(A) If'' and inserting
``If subsection (a)(2) applies and (A)''; and by striking ``if'' after
``(B)''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A3.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 2 by inserting ``A. Definitions.--'' before ``For
purposes of subsection (b)(1),''; and by adding at the end following
paragraph:
``B. Application in Cases Involving a Conviction under 18 U.S.C.
2241(c).--If the conduct that forms the basis for a conviction under 18
U.S.C. 2241(c) is that the defendant engaged in conduct described in 18
U.S.C. Sec. 2241(a) or (b), do not apply subsection (b)(1).''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A3.1 captioned ``Background'' is amended
in the first paragraph in the third sentence by inserting ``in
subsection (a)(2)'' after ``offense level''; and in the second
paragraph in the second sentence by inserting ``, except when
subsection (b)(2) applies'' after ``twelve years of age''.
(B) Increased Statutory Maximum in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2423(b):
Section 2A3.3(a) is amended by striking ``12'' inserting
``[12][14][16][18][20]''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A3.3 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 1 by striking ``Minor'' through the end of that
sentence and inserting the following:
```Minor' means (A) an individual who had not attained the age of
18; (B) an individual, whether fictitious or not, who a law enforcement
officer represented to a participant (i) had not attained the age of 18
years; and (ii) could be provided for the purposes of engaging in
sexually explicit conduct; or (C) an undercover law enforcement officer
who represented to a participant that the officer had not attained the
age of 18 years.''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A3.3 is amended by striking the
Background.
(C) New Offense in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2244(a)(5):
Section 2A3.4(b)(1) is amended by striking ``20'' each place it
appears and inserting ``22''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2A3.4 captioned ``Statutory Provisions'' is
amended by striking ``(a)(1), (2), (3)''.
(D) Increased Penalties (statutory minimum and maximum) for 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1591 Section 2G1.1(a) is amended by striking ``14'' and
inserting the following:
``(1) [34][36], if the offense of conviction is 18 U.S.C. 1591 and
the offense involved conduct described in subsection (b)(1) of that
statute; or
(2) 14, otherwise.''.
Section 2G1.1(b)(1) is amended by inserting ``subsection (a)(2)
applies and'' after ``If''.
The Commentary to Sec. 2G1.1 captioned ``Application Notes'' is
amended in Note 2 by adding at the end the following:
``Do not apply this enhancement if the base offense level is
determined under subsection (a)(1) because subsection (a)(1)
necessarily involves fraud or coercion.''.
Section 2G1.3(a) is amended by striking ``24'' and inserting:
``(1) [34][36], if the defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1591 and the offense involved conduct described in subsection
(b)(1) of that statute;
(2) [30][32], if the defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1591 and the offense involved conduct described in subsection (b)(2) of
that statute;
(3) [28][30], if the defendant was convicted under 18 U.S.C. Sec.
2422(b) or Sec. 2423(a); or
(4) 24, otherwise.''.
Section 2G1.3 is amended in subsection (b)(5) by striking ``8'' and
inserting ``[4][6][8]''.
The Commentary to Sec.