Action Affecting Export Privileges; Ihsan Elashi, Tetrabal Corporation, Al Kayali Corporation, Mynet.Net Corporation, Infocom Corporation, Synaptix.Net, Maysoon Al Kayali, Hazim Elashi, Bayan Elashi, Ghassan Elashi, Basman Elashi, Majida Salem and Fadwa Elafrangi; Order Making Denial of Export Privileges Against Ihsan Elashi Applicable to Related Persons, 4236-4238 [07-389]

Download as PDF 4236 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of the information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: January 24, 2007. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. E7–1422 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Census Bureau 2008 New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey ACTION: Proposed collection; comment request. The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before April 2, 2007. ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via e-mail at DHynek@doc.gov). SUMMARY: ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT Requests for additional information or copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions should be directed to: Howard Savage, U.S. Census Bureau, Room 7H090, Washington, DC 20233–8500, phone VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:36 Jan 29, 2007 Jkt 211001 (301)763–5665, or by e-mail to howard.a.savage@census.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Abstract The Census Bureau plans to conduct the 2008 New York City Housing and Vacancy Survey (NYCHVS) under contract for the City of New York. The primary purpose of the survey is to measure the rental vacancy rate which is the primary factor in determining the continuation of rent control regulations. Other survey information is used by city and state agencies for planning purposes as well as the private sector for business decisions. New York is required by law to have such a survey conducted every three years. Information to be collected includes: age, gender, race, Hispanic origin, and relationship of all household members; employment status, education level, and income for persons aged 15 and above. Owner/renter status (tenure) is asked for all units, including vacants. Utility costs, monthly rent, availability of kitchen and bathroom facilities, maintenance deficiencies, neighborhood suitability, and other specific questions about each unit such as number of rooms and bedrooms are also asked. The survey also poses a number of questions relating to handicapped accessibility. For vacant units, a shorter series of similar questions is asked. Finally, all vacant units and approximately five percent of occupied units will be reinterviewed for quality assurance purposes. The Census Bureau compiles the data in tabular format based on specifications of the survey sponsor, as well as nonidentifiable microdata. Both types of data are also made available to the general public through the Census Internet site. Note, however, that the sponsor receives the same data that are made generally available so as not to enable the identification of any sample respondent or household. II. Method of Collection All information will be collected by personal interview. III. Data OMB Number: 0607–0757. Form Number: H–100, H–108 (reinterview). Type of Review: Regular. Affected Public: Households. Estimated Number of Respondents: 16,500 occupied units. 1,500 vacant units. 2,000 reinterviews. Estimated Time Per Response: 30 minutes occupied. 10 minutes vacant. 10 minutes reinterview. PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 8,835. Estimated Total Annual Cost: The only cost to the respondent is that of his/her time. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.— Section 8b and Local Emergency Housing Rent Control Act, Laws of New York (Chapters 8603 and 657). IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Dated: January 24, 2007. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. E7–1427 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE [Docket No. 05–BIS–14] Bureau of Industry and Security Action Affecting Export Privileges; Ihsan Elashi, Tetrabal Corporation, Al Kayali Corporation, Mynet.Net Corporation, Infocom Corporation, Synaptix.Net, Maysoon Al Kayali, Hazim Elashi, Bayan Elashi, Ghassan Elashi, Basman Elashi, Majida Salem and Fadwa Elafrangi; Order Making Denial of Export Privileges Against Ihsan Elashi Applicable to Related Persons Pursuant to Section 766.23 of the Export Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’), the Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’), U.S. Department of Commerce, through its Office of Export Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’), has requested that I make the denial order that was imposed against Ihsan Elashi on June 29, 2006 applicable to the following E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices entities, as persons related to Ihsan Elashi: (1) Tetrabal Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 75081. (2) Al Kayali Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 75081. (3) Mynet.net Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 75081. (4) Infocom Corporation, 401 International Parkway, Richardson, Texas 75081. (5) Synaptix.Net, 401 International Parkway, Richardson, Texas 75081. (6) Maysoon Al Kayali, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 75081. (7) Hazim Elashi, Inmate 28685–177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159. (8) Bayan Elashi, Inmate 28688–177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159. (9) Ghassan Elashi, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081. (10) Basman Elashi, Inmate 29686– 177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159. (11) Majida Salem, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081. (12) Fadwa Elafrangi, 304 Town House Land, Richardson, Texas 75081. ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES (hereinafter collectively referred to as the ‘‘Related Persons’’). On June 29, 2006, an order was issued and on July 10, 2006, that order was published in the Federal Register imposing a fifty year denial of export privileges against Ihsan Medhat Elashi (a/k/a I. Ash, Haydee Herrera, Abdullah Al Nasser, Samer Suwwan, and Sammy Elashi), of Seagoville FCI, 2113 North Highway, Seagoville, Texas, 75159 (71 FR 38843, July 10, 2006), resulting from the decision and order issued by the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security after litigation of administrative charges against Ihsan Elashi related to his involvement in a conspiracy to export items to Syria without the required licenses and for his involvement in a scheme to export items to various destinations in violation of a temporary denial of his export privileges. BIS has presented evidence that indicates that the Related Persons are related to Ihsan Elashi by ownership control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of trade or business, and that it is necessary to add these persons to the denial order against Ihsan Elashi in order to avoid evasion of that order. BIS has notified all Related Persons of this action in accordance with the requirements of Sections 766.23 and 766.5(b) of the Export Administration Regulations and BIS received responses from five of the Related Persons. Three VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:36 Jan 29, 2007 Jkt 211001 of the responses, those of Ghassan Elashi, Majida Salem, and Fadwa Elafrangi, failed to address whether they are related to Ihsan Elashi by ownership control, position of responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of trade or business, and whether it is necessary to add these persons to the denial order against Ihsan Elashi in order to avoid evasion of that order. One of the responses, that of Basman Elashi, noted that he was not involved in any of the violations committed by Ihsan Elashi in violation of the temporary denial order against Ihsan Elashi and Tetrabal Corporation. The final response, that of Bayan Elashi, denies complicity in the specific transactions that were the subject of the litigation in the Ihsan Elashi case. After a review of the evidence and the responses, I find that it is necessary to make the Order imposed against Ihsan Elashi applicable to the above-named Related Persons to prevent the evasion of that Order. It Is Now Therefore Ordered First, that having been provided notice and opportunity for comments as provided in Section 766.23 of the Export Administration Regulations (hereinafter, the ‘‘Regulations’’), the following parties (hereinafter, ‘‘Related Persons’’) have been determined to be related to Ihsan Medhat Elashi (a/k/a I. Ash, Haydee Herrera, Abdullah Al Nasser, Samer Suwwan, and Sammy Elashi), of Seagoville FCI, 2113 North Highway, Seagoville, Texas, 75159, by affiliation, ownership, control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or related services, and it has been deemed necessary to make the Order denying the export privileges of Ihsan Elashi applicable to these Related Persons in order to prevent evasion of the Order: A. Tetrabal Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 75081. B. Al Kayali Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 75081. C. Mynet.net Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 75081. D. Infocom Corporation, 401 International Parkway, Richardson, Texas 75081. E. Synaptix.Net, 401 International Parkway, Richardson, Texas 75081. F. Maysoon Al Kayali, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 75081. G. Hazim Elashi, Inmate 28685–177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159. H. Bayan Elashi, Inmate 28688–177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 Noth Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159. I. Ghassan Elashi, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081. PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 4237 J. Basman Elashi, Inmate 29686–177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159. K. Majida Salem, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081. L. Fadwa Elafrangi, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081. Second, that the denial of export privileges described in the Order against Ihsan Elashi which was published in the Federal Register on July 10, 2006, shall be made applicable to the Related Persons until June 29, 2056 as follows: I. The Related Persons, their successors or assigns, and when acting for or on behalf of the Related Persons, their officers, representatives, agents, or employees (collectively, ‘‘Denied Persons’’) may not participate, directly or indirectly, in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License Exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations. II. No person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Persons any item subject to the Regulations: B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by the Denied Persons of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Persons of any item subject to the Regulations that E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1 4238 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 19 / Tuesday, January 30, 2007 / Notices has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from the Denied Persons in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Persons, or service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Persons if such service involves the use of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing. Third, that in accordance with the provisions of Section 766.23(c) of the Export Administration Regulations, any of the Related Persons may, at any time, make an appeal related to this Order by filing a full written statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202– 4022. Fourth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced direct product of U.S.origin technology. Fifth, that this Order shall be published in the Federal Register and a copy provided to each of the Related Persons. This Order is effective upon publication in the Federal Register. Entered this 23d day of January 2007. Wendy L. Wysong, Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement. [FR Doc. 07–389 Filed 1–29–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Bureau of Industry and Security ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES Acting Affecting Export Privileges; Fernando Sero, a/k/a Ferdie Resada; Order Denying Export Privileges A. Denial of Export Privileges of Fernando Sero, a/k/a Ferdie Resada On December 15, 2005, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, following a plea of guilty, Fernando Sero, a/k/a Ferdie Resada VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:36 Jan 29, 2007 Jkt 211001 (‘‘Sero’’) was convicted of violating Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. §§ 2778 (2000)) (‘‘AECA’’). Sero pled guilty to knowingly and willfully causing to be exported from the United States to a location on the Island of Mindanao, in the Southern Philippines, U.S. defense articles to wit, weapons parts, which were designated as defense articles on the United States Munitions List, without having first obtained a valid license from the Department of State for such export, or written authorization for such an export. Sero was sentenced to 40 months imprisonment followed by three years of supervised release. Section 11(h) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (currently codified at 50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420 (2000)) (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Section 766.25 of the Export Administration Regulations2 (‘‘Regulations’’) provide, in pertinent part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of Exporter Services, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Export Enforcement, may deny the export privileges of any person who has been convicted of a violation of * * * Section 38 of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778),’’ for a period not to exceed 10 years from the date of conviction. 15 CFR §§ 766.25(a) and (d). In addition, Section 750.8 of the Regulations states that BIS’s Office of Exporter Services may revoke any BIS licenses previously issued in which the person had an interest in at the time of his conviction. I have received notice of Sero’s conviction for violating the AECA, and have provided notice and an opportunity for Sero to make a written submission to the Bureau of Industry and Security as provided in Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I have also received a written submission from Sero explaining why he does not believe a 10 year denial is appropriate and have decided, following consideration of his submission and consultations with the Export Enforcement, including the Director, Office of Export Enforcement, to deny Sero’s conviction. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: I. Until December 15, 2015, Fernando Sero, a/k/a Ferdie Resada, Inmate No. 84301–054, FCI Loretto, Federal 1 Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), as extended by the Notice of August 3, 2006 (71 FR 44551, Aug. 7, 2006), has continued the Regulations in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. §§ 1701–1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). 2 The Regulations are currently codified at 15 CFR Parts 730–774 (2006). PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Correction Institute, P.O. Box 1000, Loretto, PA 15940, and with an address at: 37 Rugby Road, Yonkers, NY 10710, and when acting for or on behalf of Sero, his representatives, assigns, agents, or employees, (collectively referred to hereinafter as the ‘‘Denied Person’’) may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not limited to: A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License Exception, or export control document; B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations; or C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations. II. No person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following: A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item subject to the Regulations; B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States, including financing or other support activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control; C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to the Regulations that has been exported from the United States; D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States and which is owned, E:\FR\FM\30JAN1.SGM 30JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4236-4238]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-389]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

[Docket No. 05-BIS-14]

Bureau of Industry and Security


Action Affecting Export Privileges; Ihsan Elashi, Tetrabal 
Corporation, Al Kayali Corporation, Mynet.Net Corporation, Infocom 
Corporation, Synaptix.Net, Maysoon Al Kayali, Hazim Elashi, Bayan 
Elashi, Ghassan Elashi, Basman Elashi, Majida Salem and Fadwa 
Elafrangi; Order Making Denial of Export Privileges Against Ihsan 
Elashi Applicable to Related Persons

    Pursuant to Section 766.23 of the Export Administration Regulations 
(``EAR''), the Bureau of Industry and Security (``BIS''), U.S. 
Department of Commerce, through its Office of Export Enforcement 
(``OEE''), has requested that I make the denial order that was imposed 
against Ihsan Elashi on June 29, 2006 applicable to the following

[[Page 4237]]

entities, as persons related to Ihsan Elashi:
    (1) Tetrabal Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    (2) Al Kayali Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    (3) Mynet.net Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    (4) Infocom Corporation, 401 International Parkway, Richardson, 
Texas 75081.
    (5) Synaptix.Net, 401 International Parkway, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    (6) Maysoon Al Kayali, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    (7) Hazim Elashi, Inmate 28685-177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North 
Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159.
    (8) Bayan Elashi, Inmate 28688-177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North 
Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159.
    (9) Ghassan Elashi, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081.
    (10) Basman Elashi, Inmate 29686-177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North 
Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159.
    (11) Majida Salem, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081.
    (12) Fadwa Elafrangi, 304 Town House Land, Richardson, Texas 75081.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as the ``Related Persons'').

    On June 29, 2006, an order was issued and on July 10, 2006, that 
order was published in the Federal Register imposing a fifty year 
denial of export privileges against Ihsan Medhat Elashi (a/k/a I. Ash, 
Haydee Herrera, Abdullah Al Nasser, Samer Suwwan, and Sammy Elashi), of 
Seagoville FCI, 2113 North Highway, Seagoville, Texas, 75159 (71 FR 
38843, July 10, 2006), resulting from the decision and order issued by 
the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security after 
litigation of administrative charges against Ihsan Elashi related to 
his involvement in a conspiracy to export items to Syria without the 
required licenses and for his involvement in a scheme to export items 
to various destinations in violation of a temporary denial of his 
export privileges.
    BIS has presented evidence that indicates that the Related Persons 
are related to Ihsan Elashi by ownership control, position of 
responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of 
trade or business, and that it is necessary to add these persons to the 
denial order against Ihsan Elashi in order to avoid evasion of that 
order.
    BIS has notified all Related Persons of this action in accordance 
with the requirements of Sections 766.23 and 766.5(b) of the Export 
Administration Regulations and BIS received responses from five of the 
Related Persons. Three of the responses, those of Ghassan Elashi, 
Majida Salem, and Fadwa Elafrangi, failed to address whether they are 
related to Ihsan Elashi by ownership control, position of 
responsibility, affiliation, or other connection in the conduct of 
trade or business, and whether it is necessary to add these persons to 
the denial order against Ihsan Elashi in order to avoid evasion of that 
order. One of the responses, that of Basman Elashi, noted that he was 
not involved in any of the violations committed by Ihsan Elashi in 
violation of the temporary denial order against Ihsan Elashi and 
Tetrabal Corporation. The final response, that of Bayan Elashi, denies 
complicity in the specific transactions that were the subject of the 
litigation in the Ihsan Elashi case. After a review of the evidence and 
the responses, I find that it is necessary to make the Order imposed 
against Ihsan Elashi applicable to the above-named Related Persons to 
prevent the evasion of that Order.

It Is Now Therefore Ordered

    First, that having been provided notice and opportunity for 
comments as provided in Section 766.23 of the Export Administration 
Regulations (hereinafter, the ``Regulations''), the following parties 
(hereinafter, ``Related Persons'') have been determined to be related 
to Ihsan Medhat Elashi (a/k/a I. Ash, Haydee Herrera, Abdullah Al 
Nasser, Samer Suwwan, and Sammy Elashi), of Seagoville FCI, 2113 North 
Highway, Seagoville, Texas, 75159, by affiliation, ownership, control, 
or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or related 
services, and it has been deemed necessary to make the Order denying 
the export privileges of Ihsan Elashi applicable to these Related 
Persons in order to prevent evasion of the Order:
    A. Tetrabal Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    B. Al Kayali Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    C. Mynet.net Corporation, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    D. Infocom Corporation, 401 International Parkway, Richardson, 
Texas 75081.
    E. Synaptix.Net, 401 International Parkway, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    F. Maysoon Al Kayali, 605 Trail Lake Drive, Richardson, Texas 
75081.
    G. Hazim Elashi, Inmate 28685-177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North 
Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159.
    H. Bayan Elashi, Inmate 28688-177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 Noth 
Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159.
    I. Ghassan Elashi, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081.
    J. Basman Elashi, Inmate 29686-177, Seagoville FCI, 2113 North 
Highway, Seagoville, Texas 75159.
    K. Majida Salem, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081.
    L. Fadwa Elafrangi, 304 Town House Lane, Richardson, Texas 75081.
    Second, that the denial of export privileges described in the Order 
against Ihsan Elashi which was published in the Federal Register on 
July 10, 2006, shall be made applicable to the Related Persons until 
June 29, 2056 as follows:
    I. The Related Persons, their successors or assigns, and when 
acting for or on behalf of the Related Persons, their officers, 
representatives, agents, or employees (collectively, ``Denied 
Persons'') may not participate, directly or indirectly, in any way in 
any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology 
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be 
exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or 
in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not 
limited to:
    A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License 
Exception, or export control document;
    B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying, 
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of, 
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way, 
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the 
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other 
activity subject to the Regulations; or
    C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item 
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to 
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
    II. No person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the following:
    A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Persons any 
item subject to the Regulations:
    B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted 
acquisition by the Denied Persons of the ownership, possession, or 
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be 
exported from the United States, including financing or other support 
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires 
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
    C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition 
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Persons of any item subject to 
the Regulations that

[[Page 4238]]

has been exported from the United States;
    D. Obtain from the Denied Persons in the United States any item 
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the 
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
    E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the 
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States 
and which is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Persons, or 
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or 
controlled by the Denied Persons if such service involves the use of 
any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported 
from the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means 
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
    Third, that in accordance with the provisions of Section 766.23(c) 
of the Export Administration Regulations, any of the Related Persons 
may, at any time, make an appeal related to this Order by filing a full 
written statement in support of the appeal with the Office of the 
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 
South Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202-4022.
    Fourth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or 
other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items 
involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced 
direct product of U.S.-origin technology.
    Fifth, that this Order shall be published in the Federal Register 
and a copy provided to each of the Related Persons.
    This Order is effective upon publication in the Federal Register.

    Entered this 23d day of January 2007.
Wendy L. Wysong,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 07-389 Filed 1-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M