Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Stickney Point (SR 72) Bridge, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Mile 68.6, Sarasota, FL, 3368-3370 [E7-1028]
Download as PDF
3368
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 16 / Thursday, January 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:37 Jan 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); section 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106
Stat. 5039.
2. In Sec. 117.269, from 6 a.m. to 8:55
a.m. on January 28, 2007, temporarily
designate the existing regulatory text as
paragraph (a); suspend paragraph (a);
and add a new paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
I
§ 117.269
Biscayne Bay.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The draw of the east span of the
Venetian Causeway bridge across the
Miami Beach Channel need not open
from 6 a.m. to 8:55 a.m. on January 28,
2007. Public vessels of the United States
and vessels in distress shall be passed
at any time.
I 3. In § 117.261, from 6:10 a.m. until
9:30 a.m. on January 28, 2007,
temporarily suspend paragraph (nn),
and add a new paragraph (oo) to read as
follows:
§ 117.261 Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
from St. Marys River to Key Largo.
*
*
*
*
*
(oo) The draw of the west span of the
Venetian Causeway bridge, mile 1088.6
at Miami need not open from 6:10 a.m.
until 9:30 a.m. on January 28, 2007.
Public vessels of the United States and
vessels in distress shall be passed at any
time.
I 4. In § 117.305, from 6:25 a.m. until
10:15 a.m. on January 28, 2007,
paragraphs (c) and (d) are suspended
and new paragraphs (e) and (f) are
added to read as follows:
§ 117.305
Miami River.
*
*
PO 00000
*
Frm 00024
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
(e) The draws of the Miami Avenue
bridge, mile 0.3, and the S.W. Second
Avenue Bridge, mile 0.5, at Miami, shall
open on signal; except that, from 6:25
a.m. to 10:15 a.m. on January 28, 2007,
the draw of the Miami Avenue bridge
need not open for the passage of vessels.
Public vessels of the United States and
vessels in distress shall be passed at any
time.
(f) The draw of the Brickell Avenue
bridge across the Miami River, mile 0.1,
at Miami, need not open from 7:10 a.m.
to 12:25 p.m. on January 28, 2007.
Public vessels of the United States and
vessels in distress shall be passed at any
time.
Dated: January 18, 2007.
D.W. Kunkel,
RADM, U. S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–1027 Filed 1–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD07–06–158]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Stickney Point (SR 72) Bridge, Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, Mile 68.6,
Sarasota, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing
the operating regulation governing the
operation of the Stickney Point (SR 72)
Bridge across the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 68.6, Sarasota, Florida.
The rule will require the drawbridge to
open on the hour, twenty minutes past
the hour and forty minutes past the
hour.
DATES: This rule is effective February
26, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket (CGD07–06–130) and are
available for inspection or copying at
Commander (dpb), Seventh Coast Guard
District, 909 SE. 1st Avenue, Room 432,
Miami, Florida 33131–3050 between 8
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Barry Dragon, Seventh Coast Guard
District, Bridge Branch, telephone
number 305–415–6743.
E:\FR\FM\25JAR1.SGM
25JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 16 / Thursday, January 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On October 3, 2006, we published a
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Stickney Point (SR 72) Bridge, Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 68.6,
Sarasota, FL in the Federal Register (71
FR 58334). We received 460 comments
on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The current regulations governing the
operation of the Stickney Point Bridge,
published in 33 CFR 117.5, require the
draw to open on signal.
On December 21, 2005, a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking was published in
the Federal Register, 70 FR 75767. This
proposal was for a schedule of an hour
and half-hour opening schedule. We
received 48 comments from the public
all which were against changing the
regulations to twice an hour openings.
On April 24, 2006, a test of a twenty
minute schedule, as published in the
Federal Register 71 FR 16491, was
conducted per the request of City
officials of Sarasota, because they
believed the current drawbridge
regulation was not meeting the needs of
vehicle traffic.
We received 5 comments during the
test. Four of the comments were from
motorists who were in favor of the
twenty minute schedule and one was
against changing the schedule from an
on demand regulation.
On October 3, 2006, we published a
supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Stickney Point (SR 72) Bridge, Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 68.6,
Sarasota, FL in the Federal Register (71
FR 58334).
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received 460
responses to the Supplemental Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking. There were 448
comments in favor of the new schedule,
4 comments opposing the schedule and
8 comments recommending different
schedules. Of the 4 dissenting
comments, all were from waterway
users. One commenter desired the
schedule be implemented only during
weekdays, which it will be. Two
commenters cited safety issues of
holding vessels near the bridge. This
can be avoided by vessels timing their
approach to the bridge. The last
dissenting commenter had no specific
issue regarding the change.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:37 Jan 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
The bridge logs show the average
bridge opening request was less than
two openings per hour. The new rule
allows three openings per hour.
Therefore, the new rule will meet the
reasonable needs of navigation and also
allow local vehicular traffic the ability
to plan their crossing of the bridge.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule would affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels needing to transit the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway in the vicinity of
the Stickney Point bridge. The rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because the rule provides three
openings per hour for vessel traffic.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3369
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
E:\FR\FM\25JAR1.SGM
25JAR1
3370
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 16 / Thursday, January 25, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:37 Jan 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g); § 117.255 also issued under
the authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106 Stat.
5039.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Under
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule.
§ 117.287
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2. Amend § 117.287 by revising
paragraph (b–1) and by adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
I
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.
*
*
*
*
*
(b–1) Stickney Point (SR 72) bridge,
mile 68.6, at Sarasota. The draw shall
open on signal, except that the draw
need open only on the hour, twenty
minutes past the hour, and forty
minutes past the hour, from 6 a.m. to 10
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
(c) The draw of the Siesta Drive
Bridge, mile 71.6 at Sarasota, Florida
shall open on signal, except that from 7
a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, the draw need
open only on the hour, twenty minutes
past the hour and forty minutes past the
hour. On weekends and Federal
holidays, from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m., the
draw need open only on the hour,
twenty minutes past the hour and forty
minutes past the hour.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 5, 2007.
D.W. Kunkel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–1028 Filed 1–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\25JAR1.SGM
25JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 16 (Thursday, January 25, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3368-3370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-1028]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD07-06-158]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Stickney Point (SR 72) Bridge,
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Mile 68.6, Sarasota, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the operating regulation governing
the operation of the Stickney Point (SR 72) Bridge across the Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, mile 68.6, Sarasota, Florida. The rule will
require the drawbridge to open on the hour, twenty minutes past the
hour and forty minutes past the hour.
DATES: This rule is effective February 26, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket (CGD07-06-130) and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (dpb), Seventh Coast Guard District, 909 SE. 1st
Avenue, Room 432, Miami, Florida 33131-3050 between 8 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Barry Dragon, Seventh Coast Guard
District, Bridge Branch, telephone number 305-415-6743.
[[Page 3369]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On October 3, 2006, we published a supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Stickney
Point (SR 72) Bridge, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 68.6, Sarasota,
FL in the Federal Register (71 FR 58334). We received 460 comments on
the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested and none was held.
Background and Purpose
The current regulations governing the operation of the Stickney
Point Bridge, published in 33 CFR 117.5, require the draw to open on
signal.
On December 21, 2005, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking was published
in the Federal Register, 70 FR 75767. This proposal was for a schedule
of an hour and half-hour opening schedule. We received 48 comments from
the public all which were against changing the regulations to twice an
hour openings.
On April 24, 2006, a test of a twenty minute schedule, as published
in the Federal Register 71 FR 16491, was conducted per the request of
City officials of Sarasota, because they believed the current
drawbridge regulation was not meeting the needs of vehicle traffic.
We received 5 comments during the test. Four of the comments were
from motorists who were in favor of the twenty minute schedule and one
was against changing the schedule from an on demand regulation.
On October 3, 2006, we published a supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (SNPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Stickney
Point (SR 72) Bridge, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, mile 68.6, Sarasota,
FL in the Federal Register (71 FR 58334).
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received 460 responses to the Supplemental Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking. There were 448 comments in favor of the new
schedule, 4 comments opposing the schedule and 8 comments recommending
different schedules. Of the 4 dissenting comments, all were from
waterway users. One commenter desired the schedule be implemented only
during weekdays, which it will be. Two commenters cited safety issues
of holding vessels near the bridge. This can be avoided by vessels
timing their approach to the bridge. The last dissenting commenter had
no specific issue regarding the change.
The bridge logs show the average bridge opening request was less
than two openings per hour. The new rule allows three openings per
hour. Therefore, the new rule will meet the reasonable needs of
navigation and also allow local vehicular traffic the ability to plan
their crossing of the bridge.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule would affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels needing to transit
the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway in the vicinity of the Stickney Point
bridge. The rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because the rule provides three
openings per hour for vessel traffic.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
[[Page 3370]]
with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction,
an ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g); Sec. 117.255 also issued
under the authority of Pub. L. 102-587, 106 Stat. 5039.
0
2. Amend Sec. 117.287 by revising paragraph (b-1) and by adding
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.287 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.
* * * * *
(b-1) Stickney Point (SR 72) bridge, mile 68.6, at Sarasota. The
draw shall open on signal, except that the draw need open only on the
hour, twenty minutes past the hour, and forty minutes past the hour,
from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
(c) The draw of the Siesta Drive Bridge, mile 71.6 at Sarasota,
Florida shall open on signal, except that from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays, the draw need open only on the
hour, twenty minutes past the hour and forty minutes past the hour. On
weekends and Federal holidays, from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m., the draw need
open only on the hour, twenty minutes past the hour and forty minutes
past the hour.
* * * * *
Dated: January 5, 2007.
D.W. Kunkel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E7-1028 Filed 1-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P