Hoover Company, Inc., a Corporation, Provisional Acceptance of a Settlement Agreement and Order, 3113-3114 [07-292]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 24, 2007 / Notices
apparent that the regulatory review
period has and will continue beyond the
extended expiration date of the patent
(April 25, 2006), a second interim
extension of the patent term under 35
U.S.C. 156(d)(5) is appropriate.
A second interim extension under 35
U.S.C. 156(d)(5) of the term of U.S.
Patent No. 4,650,787 is granted for a
period of one year from the extended
expiration date of the patent, i.e., until
April 25, 2007.
Dated: January 18, 2007.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
United States of America Consumer
Product Safety Commission
[CPSC Docket No. 07–C0003]
In the Matter of Hoover Company, Inc.
a Corporation; Settlement Agreement
and Order
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
1. This Settlement Agreement is made
by and between the staff (the ‘‘staff’’) of
the U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) and
Hoover Company, Inc. (‘‘Hoover’’), a
corporation, in accordance with 16 CFR
1118.20 of the Commission’s Procedures
for Investigations, Inspections and
Inquiries under the Consumer Product
Safety Act (‘‘CPSA’’). This Settlement
Agreement and the incorporated
attached Order resolve the staff’s
allegations set forth below.
[CPSC Docket No. 07–C0003]
The Parties
Dated: January 17, 2007.
Jon W. Dudas,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. E7–1008 Filed 1–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
Hoover Company, Inc., a Corporation,
Provisional Acceptance of a
Settlement Agreement and Order
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the
Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the
Consumer Product Safety Act in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e). Published
below is a provisionally-accepted
Settlement Agreement with Hoover
Company, Inc., a corporation,
containing a civil penalty of $750,000.
DATES: Any interested person may ask
the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its
contents by filing a written request with
the Office of the Secretary by February
8, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to
comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the
Comment 07–C0003, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle F. Gillice, Trial Attorney,
Office of Compliance and Field
Operations, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814–4408;
telephone (301) 504–7667.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of
the Agreement and Order appears
below.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:44 Jan 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
2. The Commission is an independent
federal regulatory agency responsible for
the enforcement of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2051–2084.
3. Hoover is a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State
of Delaware, with its principal corporate
office located in North Canton, Ohio. At
all times relevant herein, Hoover
designed and manufactured vacuum
cleaners subject to the Settlement
Agreement and Order.
Staff Allegations
4. Between may 1998 and November
1999, Hoover manufactured
approximately 636,000 Self-Propelled
Wind Tunnel Upright vacuum cleaners
under the following model numbers:
U6423–900; U6445–900; U6425–900;
U6445–960; U6451–900; U6425–950;
U6449–900; and U6455–900,
(hereinafter ‘‘vacuum cleaners’’).
5. The vacuum cleaners are
‘‘consumer product(s)’’ and, at the times
relevant herein, Hoover was a
‘‘manufacturer’’ of ‘‘consumer
product(s)’’ which were ‘‘distributed in
commerce’’ as those terms are defined
in 3(a)(1), (4), (11), and (12) of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(1), (4), (11) and
(12).
6. The vacuum cleaners are defective
because of a poor crimp connection at
the wire termination which could cause
overheating, melting and ultimately, fire
in the switch/handle area. The vacuum
cleaners could catch fire while in use
and switched to the ‘‘ON’’ position and
while switched to ‘‘Off’’ if plugged in to
an outlet.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3113
7. On or about April 14, 1999, Hoover
first learned of a vacuum cleaner switch
overheating and melting.
8. Between October and November
1999, after receiving notice of at least
four incidents, Hoover made several
design changes to eliminate overheating
in the switch area. Hoover also directed
that all vacuum cleaners in inventory
and any brought in by customers for
repair for any reason be reworked in
order to eliminate the switch
overheating problem.
9. On February 26, 2001, Hoover’s
Safety Committee met and reviewed the
vacuum cleaner incidents. At this time,
Hoover had received notice of at least 46
incidents with the vacuum cleaners, 23
of which were allegations that the
switch/handle area caught on fire. At
least two reports indicated that the
vacuum cleaner ignited while switched
to the ‘‘OFF’’ position and consumers
believed the vacuum cleaners to be off.
The Safety Committee, however,
decided that no report should be made
to the Commission.
10. On June 11, 2002, the Safety
Committee met again to review 80 new
incidents involving the switch defect.
By this time, Hoover had received
notice of at least 127 incidents. In 73 of
these incidents, consumers reported that
the vacuum cleaners caught on fire.
11. On or about September 24, 2002,
Hoover hired an outside consulting firm
to examine and test the vacuum cleaners
to determine the cause of the switch
failures.
12. On March 12, 2003, the consulting
firm issued a report confirming that a
poor crimp connection caused the
switch to melt and malfunction. By this
time, Hoover had received notice of 171
incidents pertaining to switch
overheating and/or melting. In 96 of
these incidents, consumers reported that
their vacuum cleaners caught on fire.
13. On June 7, 2004, after receiving
notice of several vacuum cleaner
incidents, Commission staff sent Hoover
a letter requesting submission of a full
report pursuant to section 15(b) of the
CPSA.
14. On July 9, 2004, Hoover submitted
a report in response to the staff’s
request. At this time of its report,
Hoover had received notice of at least
260 consumer incidents, of which 141
involved reports of fire. Other than one
report of minor burns to hands, there
were no report consumer injuries.
15. Although Hoover had obtained
sufficient information which could
reasonably support the conclusion that
the vacuum cleaners contained a defect
which could create a substantial
product hazard, or created an
unreasonable risk of serious injury or
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
3114
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 15 / Wednesday, January 24, 2007 / Notices
death, it failed to immediately inform
the Commission of such defect or risk as
required by sections 15(b)(2) and (3) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b)(2) and (3).
In failing to do so, Hoover ‘‘knowingly’’
violated section 19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15
U.S.C. 2068(a)(4), as the term
‘‘knowingly’’ is defined in section 20(d)
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069(d).
16. Pursuant to section 20 of the
CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Hoover is subject
to civil penalties for its failure to make
a timely report under section 15(b) of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b).
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Response of Hoover
17. Hoover denies that the vacuum
cleaners contain a defect which could
create a substantial product hazard, or
create a substantial risk of serious injury
or death, and denies that it violated the
reporting requirements of section 15(b)
of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b).
Agreement of the Parties
18. The Commission has jurisdiction
over this matter and over Hoover under
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2084.
19. In settlement of the staff’s
allegations, Hoover agrees to pay a civil
penalty of seven hundred fifty thousand
dollars ($750,000.00) within twenty (20)
calendar days of service of the Final
Order of the Commission accepting this
Settlement Agreement. This payment
shall be made by check payable to the
order of the United States Treasury.
20. The parties enter this Settlement
Agreement for settlement purposes only.
The Settlement Agreement does not
constitute an admission by Hoover or a
determination by the Commission that
Hoover violated the CPSA’s reporting
requirements.
21. Upon provisional acceptance of
this Settlement Agreement and Order by
the Commission, the Commission shall
place this Agreement and Order on the
public record and shall publish it in the
Federal Register in accordance with the
procedure set forth in 16 CFR
1118.20(e). If the Commission does not
receive any written requests not to
accept the Settlement Agreement and
Order within 15 calendar days, the
Settlement Agreement and Order shall
be deemed finally accepted on the 16th
calendar day after the date it is
published in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20(f).
22. Upon final acceptance of the
Settlement Agreement by the
Commission and issuance of the Final
Order, Hoover knowingly, voluntarily
and completely waives any rights it may
have in this matter to the following :(i)
An administrative or judicial hearing;
(ii) judicial review or other challenge or
contest of the Commission’s actions; (iii)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:06 Jan 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
a determination by the Commission as
to whether Hoover failed to comply
with the CPSA and the underlying
regulations; (iv) a statement of findings
of fact and conclusions of law; and (v)
any claims under the Equal Access to
Justice Act.
23. The Commission may publicize
the terms of the Settlement Agreement
and Order.
24. The Settlement Agreement shall
apply to, and be binding upon Hoover
and each of its successors and assigns,
its parent entity, its parent’s
subsidiaries, and each of their
respective successors and assigns.
25. The Commission’s Order in this
matter is issued under the provisions of
the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051–2084, and a
violation of the Order may subject those
referenced in paragraph 24 above to
appropriate legal action.
26. This Settlement Agreement may
be used in interpreting the Order.
Agreements, understandings,
representations, or interpretations made
outside of this Settlement Agreement
and Order may not be used to vary or
to contradict its terms.
27. This Settlement Agreement and
Order shall not be waived, changed,
amended, modified, or otherwise
altered, without written agreement
thereto executed by the party against
whom such amendment, modification,
alteration, or waiver is sought to be
enforced, and approval by the
Commission.
28. If, after the effective date hereof,
any provision of this Settlement
Agreement and Order is held to be
illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under
present or future laws effective during
the terms of the Settlement Agreement
and Order, such provision shall be fully
severable. The rest of the Settlement
Agreement and Order shall remain in
full effect, unless the Commission and
Hoover determine that severing the
provision materially changes the
purpose of the Settlement Agreement
and Order.
Dated: January 2, 2007.
Hoover Corporation.
Karl R. Milam,
Chief Executive Officer.
Dated: January 4, 2007.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
John Gibson Mullan,
Director, Office of Compliance and Field
Operations.
Ronald G. Yelenik,
Acting Legal Director, Compliance Legal
Division.
Michelle Faust Gillice,
Trial Attorney, Compliance Legal Division.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
United States of America Consumer
Product Safety Commission
[CPSC Docket No. 07–C0003]
In the Matter of Hoover Company, Inc.,
A Corporation
Order
Upon consideration of the Settlement
Agreement entered into between Hoover
Company, Inc. (‘‘Hoover’’) and the staff
of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’), and
the Commission having jurisdiction
over the subject matter and over Hoover,
and it appearing the Settlement
Agreement is in the public interest, it is
Ordered, that the Settlement
Agreement be, and hereby is, accepted;
and it is
Further ordered, that Hoover shall pay
a civil penalty in the amount of seven
hundred fifty thousand dollars
($750,000.00). This payment shall be
made payable to the United States
Treasury within twenty (20) calendar
days of service of the Final Order of the
Commission upon Hoover. Upon the
failure of Hoover to make full payment
in the prescribed time, interest on the
outstanding balance shall accrue and be
paid at the federal rate of interest under
the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and
(b).
Provisionally accepted and Provisional
Order issued on the 18th day of January,
2007.
By Order of the Commission.
Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer
Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 07–292 Filed 1–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0034]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Information Collection; Examination of
Recordsby Comptroller General and
Contract Audit
Department of Defense (DOD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for an
extension to an existing OMB clearance.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
E:\FR\FM\24JAN1.SGM
24JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 15 (Wednesday, January 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3113-3114]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-292]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[CPSC Docket No. 07-C0003]
Hoover Company, Inc., a Corporation, Provisional Acceptance of a
Settlement Agreement and Order
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: It is the policy of the Commission to publish settlements
which it provisionally accepts under the Consumer Product Safety Act in
the Federal Register in accordance with the terms of 16 CFR 1118.20(e).
Published below is a provisionally-accepted Settlement Agreement with
Hoover Company, Inc., a corporation, containing a civil penalty of
$750,000.
DATES: Any interested person may ask the Commission not to accept this
agreement or otherwise comment on its contents by filing a written
request with the Office of the Secretary by February 8, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to comment on this Settlement Agreement
should send written comments to the Comment 07-C0003, Office of the
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michelle F. Gillice, Trial Attorney,
Office of Compliance and Field Operations, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland 20814-4408;
telephone (301) 504-7667.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The text of the Agreement and Order appears
below.
Dated: January 18, 2007.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
United States of America Consumer Product Safety Commission
[CPSC Docket No. 07-C0003]
In the Matter of Hoover Company, Inc. a Corporation; Settlement
Agreement and Order
1. This Settlement Agreement is made by and between the staff (the
``staff'') of the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (the
``Commission'') and Hoover Company, Inc. (``Hoover''), a corporation,
in accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20 of the Commission's Procedures for
Investigations, Inspections and Inquiries under the Consumer Product
Safety Act (``CPSA''). This Settlement Agreement and the incorporated
attached Order resolve the staff's allegations set forth below.
The Parties
2. The Commission is an independent federal regulatory agency
responsible for the enforcement of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051-2084.
3. Hoover is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
the State of Delaware, with its principal corporate office located in
North Canton, Ohio. At all times relevant herein, Hoover designed and
manufactured vacuum cleaners subject to the Settlement Agreement and
Order.
Staff Allegations
4. Between may 1998 and November 1999, Hoover manufactured
approximately 636,000 Self-Propelled Wind Tunnel Upright vacuum
cleaners under the following model numbers: U6423-900; U6445-900;
U6425-900; U6445-960; U6451-900; U6425-950; U6449-900; and U6455-900,
(hereinafter ``vacuum cleaners'').
5. The vacuum cleaners are ``consumer product(s)'' and, at the
times relevant herein, Hoover was a ``manufacturer'' of ``consumer
product(s)'' which were ``distributed in commerce'' as those terms are
defined in 3(a)(1), (4), (11), and (12) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2052(a)(1), (4), (11) and (12).
6. The vacuum cleaners are defective because of a poor crimp
connection at the wire termination which could cause overheating,
melting and ultimately, fire in the switch/handle area. The vacuum
cleaners could catch fire while in use and switched to the ``ON''
position and while switched to ``Off'' if plugged in to an outlet.
7. On or about April 14, 1999, Hoover first learned of a vacuum
cleaner switch overheating and melting.
8. Between October and November 1999, after receiving notice of at
least four incidents, Hoover made several design changes to eliminate
overheating in the switch area. Hoover also directed that all vacuum
cleaners in inventory and any brought in by customers for repair for
any reason be reworked in order to eliminate the switch overheating
problem.
9. On February 26, 2001, Hoover's Safety Committee met and reviewed
the vacuum cleaner incidents. At this time, Hoover had received notice
of at least 46 incidents with the vacuum cleaners, 23 of which were
allegations that the switch/handle area caught on fire. At least two
reports indicated that the vacuum cleaner ignited while switched to the
``OFF'' position and consumers believed the vacuum cleaners to be off.
The Safety Committee, however, decided that no report should be made to
the Commission.
10. On June 11, 2002, the Safety Committee met again to review 80
new incidents involving the switch defect. By this time, Hoover had
received notice of at least 127 incidents. In 73 of these incidents,
consumers reported that the vacuum cleaners caught on fire.
11. On or about September 24, 2002, Hoover hired an outside
consulting firm to examine and test the vacuum cleaners to determine
the cause of the switch failures.
12. On March 12, 2003, the consulting firm issued a report
confirming that a poor crimp connection caused the switch to melt and
malfunction. By this time, Hoover had received notice of 171 incidents
pertaining to switch overheating and/or melting. In 96 of these
incidents, consumers reported that their vacuum cleaners caught on
fire.
13. On June 7, 2004, after receiving notice of several vacuum
cleaner incidents, Commission staff sent Hoover a letter requesting
submission of a full report pursuant to section 15(b) of the CPSA.
14. On July 9, 2004, Hoover submitted a report in response to the
staff's request. At this time of its report, Hoover had received notice
of at least 260 consumer incidents, of which 141 involved reports of
fire. Other than one report of minor burns to hands, there were no
report consumer injuries.
15. Although Hoover had obtained sufficient information which could
reasonably support the conclusion that the vacuum cleaners contained a
defect which could create a substantial product hazard, or created an
unreasonable risk of serious injury or
[[Page 3114]]
death, it failed to immediately inform the Commission of such defect or
risk as required by sections 15(b)(2) and (3) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2064(b)(2) and (3). In failing to do so, Hoover ``knowingly'' violated
section 19(a)(4) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2068(a)(4), as the term
``knowingly'' is defined in section 20(d) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C.
2069(d).
16. Pursuant to section 20 of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2069, Hoover is
subject to civil penalties for its failure to make a timely report
under section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b).
Response of Hoover
17. Hoover denies that the vacuum cleaners contain a defect which
could create a substantial product hazard, or create a substantial risk
of serious injury or death, and denies that it violated the reporting
requirements of section 15(b) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2064(b).
Agreement of the Parties
18. The Commission has jurisdiction over this matter and over
Hoover under the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051-2084.
19. In settlement of the staff's allegations, Hoover agrees to pay
a civil penalty of seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000.00)
within twenty (20) calendar days of service of the Final Order of the
Commission accepting this Settlement Agreement. This payment shall be
made by check payable to the order of the United States Treasury.
20. The parties enter this Settlement Agreement for settlement
purposes only. The Settlement Agreement does not constitute an
admission by Hoover or a determination by the Commission that Hoover
violated the CPSA's reporting requirements.
21. Upon provisional acceptance of this Settlement Agreement and
Order by the Commission, the Commission shall place this Agreement and
Order on the public record and shall publish it in the Federal Register
in accordance with the procedure set forth in 16 CFR 1118.20(e). If the
Commission does not receive any written requests not to accept the
Settlement Agreement and Order within 15 calendar days, the Settlement
Agreement and Order shall be deemed finally accepted on the 16th
calendar day after the date it is published in the Federal Register, in
accordance with 16 CFR 1118.20(f).
22. Upon final acceptance of the Settlement Agreement by the
Commission and issuance of the Final Order, Hoover knowingly,
voluntarily and completely waives any rights it may have in this matter
to the following :(i) An administrative or judicial hearing; (ii)
judicial review or other challenge or contest of the Commission's
actions; (iii) a determination by the Commission as to whether Hoover
failed to comply with the CPSA and the underlying regulations; (iv) a
statement of findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (v) any
claims under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
23. The Commission may publicize the terms of the Settlement
Agreement and Order.
24. The Settlement Agreement shall apply to, and be binding upon
Hoover and each of its successors and assigns, its parent entity, its
parent's subsidiaries, and each of their respective successors and
assigns.
25. The Commission's Order in this matter is issued under the
provisions of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. 2051-2084, and a violation of the
Order may subject those referenced in paragraph 24 above to appropriate
legal action.
26. This Settlement Agreement may be used in interpreting the
Order. Agreements, understandings, representations, or interpretations
made outside of this Settlement Agreement and Order may not be used to
vary or to contradict its terms.
27. This Settlement Agreement and Order shall not be waived,
changed, amended, modified, or otherwise altered, without written
agreement thereto executed by the party against whom such amendment,
modification, alteration, or waiver is sought to be enforced, and
approval by the Commission.
28. If, after the effective date hereof, any provision of this
Settlement Agreement and Order is held to be illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable under present or future laws effective during the terms
of the Settlement Agreement and Order, such provision shall be fully
severable. The rest of the Settlement Agreement and Order shall remain
in full effect, unless the Commission and Hoover determine that
severing the provision materially changes the purpose of the Settlement
Agreement and Order.
Dated: January 2, 2007.
Hoover Corporation.
Karl R. Milam,
Chief Executive Officer.
Dated: January 4, 2007.
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
John Gibson Mullan,
Director, Office of Compliance and Field Operations.
Ronald G. Yelenik,
Acting Legal Director, Compliance Legal Division.
Michelle Faust Gillice,
Trial Attorney, Compliance Legal Division.
United States of America Consumer Product Safety Commission
[CPSC Docket No. 07-C0003]
In the Matter of Hoover Company, Inc., A Corporation
Order
Upon consideration of the Settlement Agreement entered into between
Hoover Company, Inc. (``Hoover'') and the staff of the U.S. Consumer
Product Safety Commission (the ``Commission''), and the Commission
having jurisdiction over the subject matter and over Hoover, and it
appearing the Settlement Agreement is in the public interest, it is
Ordered, that the Settlement Agreement be, and hereby is, accepted;
and it is
Further ordered, that Hoover shall pay a civil penalty in the
amount of seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($750,000.00). This
payment shall be made payable to the United States Treasury within
twenty (20) calendar days of service of the Final Order of the
Commission upon Hoover. Upon the failure of Hoover to make full payment
in the prescribed time, interest on the outstanding balance shall
accrue and be paid at the federal rate of interest under the provisions
of 28 U.S.C. 1961(a) and (b).
Provisionally accepted and Provisional Order issued on the 18th
day of January, 2007.
By Order of the Commission.
Todd A. Stevenson, Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-292 Filed 1-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M