Grants for Correctional Facilities, 2186-2187 [E7-619]
Download as PDF
2186
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 11 / Thursday, January 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
regulations contain no substantive
changes of interpretation. Therefore,
opportunity for prior comment is
unnecessary, and we are issuing these
regulations as final rules.
In addition, we find good cause for
dispensing with the 30-day delay in the
effective date of a substantive rule,
provided for by 5 U.S.C. 553(d), since
we are making no substantive changes
in the cost-of-living increase provisions.
Without this change, however, our rules
will conflict with the computation of
the CPI as reported by the Bureau of
Labor Statistics.
Executive Order 12866
We have consulted with the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
determined that these rules do not meet
the criteria for a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 13258.
Thus, they were not subject to OMB
review. We have also determined that
these rules meet the plain language
requirement of Executive Order 12866,
as amended by Executive Order 13258.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that these regulations will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Therefore, a regulatory
flexibility analysis as provided in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
is not required.
PART 404—FEDERAL OLD-AGE,
SURVIVORS AND DISABILITY
INSURANCE (1950–)
Subpart C—[Amended]
1. The authority citation for subpart C
of part 404 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Secs. 202(a), 205(a), 215, and
702(a)(5) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.
402(a), 405(a), 415, and 902(a)(5)).
2. Section 404.275 (a) is revised to
read as follows:
I
§ 404.275 How is an automatic cost-ofliving increase calculated?
(a) Increase based on the CPI. We
compute the average of the CPI for the
quarters that begin and end the
measuring period by adding the three
monthly CPI figures, dividing the total
by three, and rounding the result to the
same number of decimal places as the
published CPI figures. If the number of
decimal places in the published CPI
values differs between those used for
the beginning and ending quarters, we
use the number for the ending quarter.
If the average for the ending quarter is
higher than the average for the
beginning quarter, we divide the average
for the ending quarter by the average of
the beginning quarter to determine the
percentage increase in the CPI over the
measuring period.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–620 Filed 1–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
Paperwork Reduction Act
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
These final regulations impose no
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements requiring OMB clearance.
Office of Justice Programs
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 96.001, Social Security—
Disability Insurance; 96.002, Social
Security—Retirement Insurance; 96.004,
Social Security—Survivors Insurance)
[OJP (OJP)—Docket No. 1382]
RIN 1121–AA41
Grants for Correctional Facilities
Administrative practice and
procedure, Blind, Disability benefits,
Old-age, Survivors and Disability
Insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Social Security.
Dated: January 10, 2007.
Jo Anne B. Barnhart,
Commissioner of Social Security.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, we are amending subpart C of
part 404 of title 20 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 Jan 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
Office of Justice Programs,
Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 404
I
28 CFR Part 91
SUMMARY: The Office of Justice Programs
(OJP), Department of Justice, is adopting
as a final rule, without change, an
interim final rule with request for
comments that OJP published on
January 15, 2004, at 69 FR 2298. That
interim rule updated and clarified what
the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA),
a component of OJP, considered to be an
eligible ‘‘Indian tribe,’’ and what the
BJA considered to be ‘‘construction,’’
under the Grants for Correctional
Facilities on Tribal Lands Program. OJP
did not receive any comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DATES:
Effective February 20, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Pressley, Bureau of Justice
Assistance, Office of Justice Programs,
810 Seventh Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20531; Telephone: (202) 353–8643.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
The
Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA)
administers several major grant
programs and provides technical
assistance to state, local, and tribal
governments to help them with the
implementation of corrections-related
programs under the Violent Crime
Control and Law Enforcement Act of
1994. One such program is the Grants
for Correctional Facilities on Tribal
Lands Program. This program provides
funding for the construction of
correctional facilities on tribal lands for
the incarceration of offenders subject to
tribal jurisdiction.
Grants for Correctional Facilities on
Tribal Lands Program funds may not be
used for the purchase of land or for the
costs associated with the operation of
the correctional facility.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 24, 1996, the Office of
Justice Programs (OJP) published an
interim rule (at 61 FR 49969), amending
28 CFR part 91, subpart C, Grants for
Correctional Facilities, to implement the
Violent Offender Incarceration and
Truth-in-Sentencing Grants Program for
Indian Tribes, as required by section
114 of the Fiscal Year 1996 Omnibus
Consolidated Rescissions and
Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 104–134).
Section 114 amended the Violent Crime
Control and Law Enforcement Act of
1994, 42 U.S.C. 13701 et seq., to
authorize a reservation of funds for the
specific purpose of allowing the
Attorney General to make discretionary
grants to Indian tribes.
After the publication of the 1996
interim rule, OJP received comments
requesting further clarification of certain
terms. Accordingly, on January 15,
2004, OJP published a second interim
rule seeking comments (at 69 FR 2298)
and further clarifying what the BJA
considers to be an eligible ‘‘Indian
tribe’’ and what it considered to be
‘‘construction.’’
Comments on the second interim rule
were required to be received on or by
March 15, 2004. OJP did not receive any
comments. Therefore, for the reasons
given in the interim rule, OJP is
adopting the interim rule as a final rule.
No changes were made between the
second interim rule and this final rule.
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 11 / Thursday, January 18, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
This final rule has been written and
reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12866, Sec. 1(b), Principles of
Regulation. OJP has determined that this
final rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
Sec. 3(f), Regulatory Planning and
Review, and accordingly this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
issuance of this final rule does not have
a significant impact on the quality of the
human environment and, therefore,
does not require the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement.
Energy Impact Statement
OJP has evaluated this final rule and
has determined that it creates no new
impact on the energy supply or
distribution.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 91
Grant programs law.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
OJP, in accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), has reviewed this final rule and
by approving it certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because the economic impact is
limited to OJP’s appropriated funds.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This final rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100,000,000 or more
in any one year, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions were
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This final rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 251 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. This
rule will not result in an annual effect
on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreignbased companies in domestic and
export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
No new collection of information
requirements as defined under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3504(h)) are being added by this final
rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Environmental Impact
OJP has evaluated this final rule in
accordance with its procedures for
ensuring full consideration of the
potential environmental impacts of
OJP’s actions, as required by the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and related
directives. OJP has concluded that the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Jan 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
PART 91—GRANTS FOR
CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES
Accordingly, OJP is adopting as a final
rule, without change, the second interim
rule that amended 28 CFR part 91 and
that was published at 69 FR 2298 on
January 15, 2004.
I
Regina B. Schofield,
Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice
Programs.
[FR Doc. E7–619 Filed 1–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION
29 CFR Part 2700
Emergency Response Plan Dispute
Proceedings and Related Procedural
Rules
Federal Mine Safety and Health
Review Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Mine Safety and
Health Review Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) is an independent
adjudicatory agency that provides
hearings and appellate review of cases
arising under the Federal Mine Safety
and Health Act of 1977 (the ‘‘Mine
Act’’). Hearings are held before the
Commission’s Administrative Law
Judges, and appellate review is provided
by a five-member Review Commission
appointed by the President and
confirmed by the Senate. On July 18,
2006, the Commission published an
interim rule to implement the Mine
Improvement and New Emergency
Response Act of 2006 (the ‘‘MINER
Act’’), which amended the Mine Act to
improve the safety of miners,
particularly in underground coal mines.
The MINER Act provides for
Commission review of disputes arising
over emergency response plans for
underground coal mines. The interim
rule established procedures for the
submission and consideration of such
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2187
disputes. The Commission invited
public comment on the interim rule.
The Commission has reviewed the
comments on the interim rule and has
decided to make certain changes in the
rule. This publication makes final
changes to Rule 24, the rule designed to
implement the MINER Act. In
connection with revising Rule 24, the
Commission is also amending four of its
other procedural rules to make them
consistent with Rule 24.
DATES: This final rule will take effect on
January 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and questions
may be mailed to Michael A. McCord,
General Counsel, Office of the General
Counsel, Federal Mine Safety and
Health Review Commission, 601 New
Jersey Avenue, NW., Suite 9500,
Washington, DC 20001, or sent via
facsimile to 202–434–9944.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael A. McCord, General Counsel,
Office of the General Counsel, 601 New
Jersey Avenue, NW., Suite 9500,
Washington, DC 20001; telephone 202–
434–9935; fax 202–434–9944.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final
rules will apply to cases initiated after
the rules take effect. The final rules also
apply to proceedings pending on the
effective date, except to the extent that
such application would not be feasible,
or would work injustice, in which event
the former rules of procedure would
continue to apply.
I. Background
On June 15, 2006, President George
W. Bush signed into law the MINER
Act, Pub. L. 109–236, 120 Stat. 493
(2006). Section 2 of the MINER Act
amends section 316 of the Mine Act (30
U.S.C. 876) by adding a new section (b),
entitled ‘‘Accident Preparedness and
Response.’’ Section 316(b)(2)(A)
provides that, within 60 days of
enactment, each underground coal mine
operator is required to develop and
adopt a ‘‘written accident response
plan.’’ Section 316(b)(2)(B) requires the
plan to provide for the evacuation of all
individuals endangered by an
emergency and the maintenance of
individuals trapped underground in the
event that miners are not able to
evacuate the mine. Under section
316(b)(2)(C), all plans shall be subject to
review and approval by the Secretary of
Labor (the ‘‘Secretary’’), and must: (i)
Afford miners a level of safety
protection at least consistent with the
existing standards; (ii) reflect the most
recent credible scientific research; (iii)
be technologically feasible, make use of
current commercially available
technology, and account for the specific
E:\FR\FM\18JAR1.SGM
18JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 11 (Thursday, January 18, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2186-2187]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-619]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Office of Justice Programs
28 CFR Part 91
[OJP (OJP)--Docket No. 1382]
RIN 1121-AA41
Grants for Correctional Facilities
AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Department of Justice,
is adopting as a final rule, without change, an interim final rule with
request for comments that OJP published on January 15, 2004, at 69 FR
2298. That interim rule updated and clarified what the Bureau of
Justice Assistance (BJA), a component of OJP, considered to be an
eligible ``Indian tribe,'' and what the BJA considered to be
``construction,'' under the Grants for Correctional Facilities on
Tribal Lands Program. OJP did not receive any comments.
DATES: Effective February 20, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Pressley, Bureau of Justice
Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, 810 Seventh Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20531; Telephone: (202) 353-8643. (This is not a toll-
free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA)
administers several major grant programs and provides technical
assistance to state, local, and tribal governments to help them with
the implementation of corrections-related programs under the Violent
Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994. One such program is the
Grants for Correctional Facilities on Tribal Lands Program. This
program provides funding for the construction of correctional
facilities on tribal lands for the incarceration of offenders subject
to tribal jurisdiction.
Grants for Correctional Facilities on Tribal Lands Program funds
may not be used for the purchase of land or for the costs associated
with the operation of the correctional facility.
Background
On September 24, 1996, the Office of Justice Programs (OJP)
published an interim rule (at 61 FR 49969), amending 28 CFR part 91,
subpart C, Grants for Correctional Facilities, to implement the Violent
Offender Incarceration and Truth-in-Sentencing Grants Program for
Indian Tribes, as required by section 114 of the Fiscal Year 1996
Omnibus Consolidated Rescissions and Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 104-
134). Section 114 amended the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement
Act of 1994, 42 U.S.C. 13701 et seq., to authorize a reservation of
funds for the specific purpose of allowing the Attorney General to make
discretionary grants to Indian tribes.
After the publication of the 1996 interim rule, OJP received
comments requesting further clarification of certain terms.
Accordingly, on January 15, 2004, OJP published a second interim rule
seeking comments (at 69 FR 2298) and further clarifying what the BJA
considers to be an eligible ``Indian tribe'' and what it considered to
be ``construction.''
Comments on the second interim rule were required to be received on
or by March 15, 2004. OJP did not receive any comments. Therefore, for
the reasons given in the interim rule, OJP is adopting the interim rule
as a final rule. No changes were made between the second interim rule
and this final rule.
[[Page 2187]]
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
This final rule has been written and reviewed in accordance with
Executive Order 12866, Sec. 1(b), Principles of Regulation. OJP has
determined that this final rule is not a ``significant regulatory
action'' under Executive Order 12866, Sec. 3(f), Regulatory Planning
and Review, and accordingly this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
OJP, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
605(b)), has reviewed this final rule and by approving it certifies
that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because the economic impact is
limited to OJP's appropriated funds.
Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995
This final rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed
necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This final rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5
U.S.C. 804. This rule will not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in costs or prices;
or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and
export markets.
Paperwork Reduction Act
No new collection of information requirements as defined under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3504(h)) are being added by this
final rule.
Environmental Impact
OJP has evaluated this final rule in accordance with its procedures
for ensuring full consideration of the potential environmental impacts
of OJP's actions, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and related directives. OJP has concluded that
the issuance of this final rule does not have a significant impact on
the quality of the human environment and, therefore, does not require
the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement.
Energy Impact Statement
OJP has evaluated this final rule and has determined that it
creates no new impact on the energy supply or distribution.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 91
Grant programs law.
PART 91--GRANTS FOR CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES
0
Accordingly, OJP is adopting as a final rule, without change, the
second interim rule that amended 28 CFR part 91 and that was published
at 69 FR 2298 on January 15, 2004.
Regina B. Schofield,
Assistant Attorney General, Office of Justice Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-619 Filed 1-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P