Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Partial Exemption to the Minimum Grade Requirements, 1919-1922 [07-162]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Research Subcommittee, and Education
and Promotion Subcommittee.
Alternative expenditure levels were
discussed by these groups, based upon
the relative value of various research
projects to the tomato industry. The
assessment rate of $0.035 per 25-pound
container of assessable tomatoes was
determined by examining the
anticipated expenses and expected
shipments and considering available
reserves. The assessment rate should
generate $1,750,000 in income.
Considering income from interest and
other sources of $190,000, with
assessments, total income should be
approximately $253,700 below the
anticipated expenses, which the
Committee determined to be acceptable.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming season indicates that the
grower price for the 2006–07 season
could range between $8.27 and $12.95
per 25-pound container or equivalent of
tomatoes. Therefore, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2006–07
fiscal period as a percentage of total
grower revenue could range between 0.3
and 0.4 percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to producers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the marketing order. In
addition, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
Florida tomato industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the August
22, 2006, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large Florida tomato
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
The AMS is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:05 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on November 16, 2006 (71 FR
66702). Copies of the proposed rule
were also mailed or sent via facsimile to
all Florida tomato handlers. Finally, the
proposal was made available through
the Internet by USDA and the Office of
the Federal Register. A 15-day comment
period ending December 1, 2006, was
provided for interested persons to
respond to the proposal. No comments
were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it also found
and determined that good cause exists
for not postponing the effective date of
this rule until 30 days after publication
in the Federal Register because: (1) The
2006–07 fiscal period began on August
1, 2006, and the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for
each fiscal period apply to all assessable
Florida tomatoes handled during such
fiscal period; (2) the Committee needs to
have sufficient funds to pay its expenses
which are incurred on a continuous
basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this
action which was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
public meeting and is similar to other
assessment rate actions issued in past
fiscal periods. Also, a 15-day comment
period was provided for in the proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tomatoes.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 966 is amended as
follows:
PART 966—TOMATOES GROWN IN
FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 966 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 966.234 is revised to read
as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 966.234
1919
Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2006, an
assessment rate of $0.035 per 25-pound
container or equivalent is established
for Florida tomatoes.
Dated: January 11, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 07–149 Filed 1–11–07; 4:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 966
[Docket No. FVO6–966–1 FR]
Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Partial
Exemption to the Minimum Grade
Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule provides a partial
exemption to the minimum grade
requirements under the marketing order
for tomatoes grown in Florida (order).
The Florida Tomato Committee
(Committee) locally administers the
order. Under the order, Florida tomatoes
must meet at least a U.S. No. 2 grade
before they can be shipped and sold
outside the regulated area. This rule
exempts UglyRipeTM (UglyRipe)
tomatoes from the shape requirements
associated with the U.S. No. 2 grade.
This change increases the volume of
UglyRipe tomatoes that will meet the
order requirements, and will help
increase shipments and availability of
these tomatoes for consumers.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule becomes
effective January 18, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Pimental, Marketing Specialist,
or Christian Nissen, Regional Manager,
Southeast Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 325–8793, or e-mail:
William.Pimental@USDA.gov, or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or e-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
1920
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
This final
rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 125 and Marketing
Order No. 966, both as amended (7 CFR
part 966), regulating the handling of
tomatoes grown in certain designated
counties in Florida, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The marketing
agreement and order are effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule provides a partial
exemption to the minimum grade
requirements prescribed under the
order. The order’s rules and regulations
specify that Florida tomatoes must meet
at least a U.S. No. 2 grade before they
can be shipped and sold outside the
regulated area. This rule exempts
UglyRipe tomatoes from the shape
requirements associated with the U.S.
No. 2 grade. This change increases the
volume of UglyRipe tomatoes that will
meet the order requirements, and will
help increase shipments and availability
of these tomatoes for consumers. In
addition, it is anticipated that this
change will help promote continued
innovation within the industry.
Section 966.52 of the order provides
the authority for the establishment of
grade and size requirements for Florida
tomatoes. Form and shape represent
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:05 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
part of the elements of grade. Section
966.323 of the order’s rules and
regulations specifies, in part, the
minimum grade requirements for
Florida tomatoes. The current minimum
grade requirement for Florida tomatoes
is a U.S. No. 2. The specifics of this
grade requirement are listed under the
U.S. Standards for Grades of Fresh
Tomatoes (7 CFR 51.1855–51.1877).
The U.S. Standards for Grades of
Fresh Tomatoes (Standards) specify the
criteria tomatoes must meet to grade a
U.S. No. 2, including that they must be
reasonably well formed, and not more
than slightly rough. These two elements
relate specifically to the shape of the
tomato. The definitions section of the
Standards defines reasonably well
formed as not decidedly kidney shaped,
lopsided, elongated, angular, or
otherwise decidedly deformed. The
term slightly rough means that the
tomato is not decidedly ridged or
grooved. This rule amends § 966.323 to
exempt UglyRipe tomatoes from these
shape requirements as specified under
the grade for a U.S. No. 2.
UglyRipe tomatoes are a trademarked
tomato variety bred to look and taste
like an heirloom-type tomato. One of the
characteristics of this variety is its
appearance. UglyRipe tomatoes are
often shaped differently from other
round tomatoes. Depending on the time
of year and the weather, UglyRipe
tomatoes are concave on the stem end
with deep, ridged shoulders. They can
also appear kidney shaped and
lopsided. Because of this variance in
shape and appearance, UglyRipe
tomatoes can have difficulty meeting the
shape requirements of the U.S. No. 2
grade.
This rule provides UglyRipe tomatoes
with a partial exemption from the grade
requirements under the order. UglyRipe
tomatoes are only exempt from the
shape requirements of the grade and are
still required to meet all other aspects of
the U.S. No. 2 grade. UglyRipe tomatoes
also continue to be required to meet all
other requirements under the marketing
order, such as size, pack and container,
and inspection.
Prior to the 1998–99 season, the
Committee recommended that the
minimum grade be increased from a
U.S. No. 3 to a U.S. No. 2. Committee
members agree that increasing the grade
requirement has been very beneficial to
the industry and in the marketing of
Florida tomatoes. Further, some
Committee members have stated that a
large part of the volume of the standard
commercial varieties of tomatoes which
fail to make the grade are rejected
because of their shape and appearance.
Consequently, there was some industry
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
concern that providing an exemption for
UglyRipe tomatoes could result in the
shipment of U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes
of other varieties, contrary to the
objectives of the exemption and the
order.
To address this concern, the
producers of UglyRipe tomatoes
pursued entry into USDA’s Identity
Preservation (IP) program. This program
was developed by the Agricultural
Marketing Service to assist companies
in marketing products having unique
traits. The program provides
independent, third-party verification of
the segregation of a company’s unique
product at every stage, from seed,
production and processing, to
distribution. UglyRipe tomatoes were
granted positive program status in early
2006.
This partial exemption only extends
to UglyRipe tomatoes covered under the
IP program. As such, this should help
ensure that only UglyRipe tomatoes are
shipped under the exemption. In
addition, this exemption is contingent
upon UglyRipe tomatoes continuing to
meet the requirements of the IP
program.
This rule exempts UglyRipe tomatoes
from the shape requirements associated
with the U.S. No. 2 grade. This change
increases the volume of UglyRipe
tomatoes that will meet order
requirements, and will help increase
shipments and availability of these
tomatoes. In addition, it is hoped that
this change will help promote
continued innovation within the
industry.
Section 8e of the Act provides that
when certain domestically produced
commodities, including tomatoes, are
regulated under a Federal marketing
order, imports of that commodity must
meet the same or comparable grade,
size, quality, and maturity requirements.
Since this rule provides a partial
exemption to the minimum grade
requirements under the domestic
handling regulations, a corresponding
change to the import regulations is also
needed. A final rule providing the same
partial exemption to the minimum grade
requirements under the import
regulations will be issued as a separate
action.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 100
producers of tomatoes in the production
area and approximately 70 handlers
subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural
producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those
having annual receipts less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $6,500,000 (13
CFR 121.201).
Based on industry and Committee
data, the average annual price for fresh
Florida tomatoes during the 2004–05
season was approximately $12.50 per
25-pound container, and fresh
shipments totaled 53,025,915 25-pound
cartons of tomatoes. Committee data
indicates approximately 27 percent of
the handlers handle 95 percent of the
total volume shipped outside the
regulated area. Based on the average
price, about 75 percent of handlers
could be considered small businesses
under SBA’s definition. In addition,
based on production, grower prices as
reported by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service, and the total number
of Florida tomato growers, the average
annual grower revenue is below
$750,000. Thus, the majority of handlers
and producers of Florida tomatoes may
be classified as small entities.
This final rule provides a partial
exemption to the minimum grade
requirements for tomatoes grown in
Florida. Under the order, Florida
tomatoes must meet at least a U.S. No.
2 grade before they can be shipped and
sold outside the regulated area. This
final rule exempts UglyRipe tomatoes
from the shape requirements specified
under the Standards for a U.S. No. 2
grade. This change increases the volume
of UglyRipe tomatoes that will meet the
order requirements, and will help
increase shipments and availability of
these tomatoes for consumers. This final
rule amends the provisions of § 966.323.
Authority for this action is provided in
§ 966.52 of the order.
This change represents a small
increase in costs for producers and
handlers of UglyRipe tomatoes,
primarily from costs associated with
developing and maintaining the IP
program. However, the majority of
facilities associated with UglyRipe
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:05 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
tomatoes were involved with the IP
program prior to this rule and have
already received a successful audit.
Therefore, the additional costs
associated with this action are those
costs related to maintaining and
complying with the IP program. It is
anticipated that these costs will be
minimal and will be offset by the
increased sales of UglyRipe tomatoes.
Finally, UglyRipe tomatoes are still
required to meet the majority of the
requirements for a U.S. No. 2 grade, and
are usually priced higher than U.S. No.
2 graded standard commercial variety
tomatoes. Therefore, this action should
not have a price depressing effect on
standard varieties, and because of the
difference in price, this exemption
should not have a significant impact on
the market share for standard
commercial varieties of Florida
tomatoes.
One alternative to this action that was
considered was to not provide an
exemption from shape requirements for
UglyRipe tomatoes. This option would
not have allowed for an increase in the
volume of UglyRipe tomatoes that
would meet the order requirements, and
would not help increase shipment and
availability of these tomatoes. Therefore,
this alternative was rejected.
This final rule provides a partial
exemption to the minimum grade
requirements under the Florida tomato
marketing order. Accordingly, this rule
will not impose any additional reporting
or recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large tomato handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
The AMS is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
As noted in the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this final rule.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on June 29, 2006 (71 FR 37014).
Copies of the rule were mailed or sent
via facsimile to all Committee members
and tomato handlers. Finally, the rule
was made available through the Internet
by USDA and the Office of the Federal
Register. A 60-day comment period
ending August 28, 2006, was provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to the proposal.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1921
Eighty-eight comments were received
during the comment period in response
to the proposal. Of the comments
received, 79 were in support of the
regulation and 9 were in opposition.
One comment was received after the
close of the comment period.
The comments in support of the
proposal expressed appreciation for the
taste of UglyRipe tomatoes, and
supported a greater market availability
for UglyRipe tomatoes. Several
commenters stated that UglyRipe
tomatoes compared favorably with
homegrown tomatoes. Other
commenters compared the taste as being
equal to local tomatoes, even in winter
when local tomatoes were not available.
Several of the comments stated that
good taste was of greater importance
than appearance. Commenters also
expressed that they have had difficulty
in finding UglyRipe tomatoes available
for purchase and supported this rule
and its efforts to increase availability.
Nine comments were received in
opposition to the proposed rule. Of
these comments, five expressed
concerns regarding this proposal’s
impact on orderly marketing. Four
commenters stated that the current
marketing order requirements provide
stability to the industry. One commenter
stated that the standards established
under the order are key to the
establishment of an orderly market for
Florida growers and that this rule will
weaken the industry’s ability to
maintain an orderly market. Another
commenter stated that the proposed rule
does not establish, maintain, or support
orderly marketing conditions, but does
the exact opposite.
One of the main goals of marketing
orders is to establish orderly marketing
conditions for those commodities
covered under marketing orders. As
previously noted, this partial exemption
only extends to UglyRipe tomatoes.
Further, this rule only provides
UglyRipe tomatoes with a partial
exemption from the shape requirements
of the U.S. No. 2 grade. UglyRipe
tomatoes are still subject to the
requirements for maturity, ripeness,
softness, development, decay, and
damage as specified under the
Standards for a U.S. No. 2 grade. Even
with this partial exemption, the
requirements for UglyRipe tomatoes are
still significantly higher than those for
U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes.
Because this partial exemption is
narrowly defined, the vast majority of
the tomatoes shipped from Florida will
still meet the requirements for a U.S.
No. 2 grade. Therefore, this change will
not diminish the overall benefits of the
established grade standard.
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
1922
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Consequently, this change should not
have an adverse impact on the orderly
market for Florida tomatoes.
Five commenters stated that this
change would allow UglyRipe tomatoes
to circumvent the requirements of the
order. Two comments declared that this
rule would allow all UglyRipe tomatoes
produced to be sold outside of the
regulated area. Another comment stated
that this rule would allow UglyRipe
tomatoes to escape the standards
applicable to all other tomatoes.
This partial exemption will not allow
UglyRipe tomatoes to circumvent the
requirements of the order, or allow all
UglyRipe tomatoes produced in Florida
to be shipped outside the regulated area.
As stated above, UglyRipe tomatoes will
still have to meet the majority of the
requirements for U.S. No. 2 grade
tomatoes, and will have to be inspected
to ensure these requirements are met.
UglyRipe tomatoes also continue to be
required to meet all other requirements
under the marketing order, such as size,
pack and container, and assessment
provisions. In addition, UglyRipe
tomatoes must meet the requirements of
the IP program.
Five commenters expressed concern
that providing this exemption for the
UglyRipe tomato will create a loophole,
which will result in the shipment of
U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes of other
varieties by other producers. One of the
commenters stated that with this
change, every farmer in Florida will be
selling his off shaped fruit. Another
commenter wrote that this action
presents too many opportunities for
domestic growers and importers to sell
tomatoes of inferior quality. Another
commenter stated that they had no
doubt that efforts will be made to
market U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes that
resemble UglyRipe tomatoes.
We disagree with these comments.
There are safeguards in place to address
these issues. In addition to the existing
inspection requirements, and
compliance efforts, this partial
exemption only extends to UglyRipe
tomatoes covered under the IP program.
This program was developed by AMS
and provides independent, third-party
verification of the segregation of a
company’s product at every stage, from
seed, production and processing, to
distribution. This will help ensure that
only UglyRipe tomatoes are shipped
using this partial exemption, as only
handlers covered under the IP program
will be allowed to pack under the
exemption. Further, USDA plans to
closely monitor compliance with this
exemption.
Three commenters stated that this
rule will have a negative economic
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:03 Jan 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
impact on the tomato industry. One
commenter stated that this rule will
cause a market share loss and loss of
sales. Another comment states that this
will increase supply, which will
negatively affect price.
We disagree because this partial
exemption is so narrowly defined, and
only applies to UglyRipe tomatoes, it
should not result in a significant
increase in the overall supply of
tomatoes. Also, this action should not
have a significant impact on price. Prior
to the 1998–99 season, the Committee
recommended that the minimum grade
be increased from a U.S. No. 3 to a U.S.
No. 2. The reason for this action was
that U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes were
having a price depressing effect on the
market. This is because U.S. No. 3 grade
tomatoes of standard commercial
varieties sell at prices below those for
U.S. No. 2 grade tomatoes. However, in
the case of UglyRipe tomatoes, they are
still required to meet the majority of the
requirements for a U.S. No. 2 grade, and
are usually priced higher than U.S. No.
2 graded standard commercial variety
tomatoes. Therefore this action should
not have a price depressing effect on
standard varieties, and because of the
difference in price this exemption
should not have a significant impact on
the market share for standard
commercial varieties of Florida
tomatoes.
Two commenters also stated that this
regulation would have a negative impact
on small growers. The commenters
stated that when USDA did its initial
regulatory flexibility analysis USDA
only considered the impact on
producers and handlers of UglyRipe
tomatoes. The commenters stated that
this rule would have a negative impact
on small producers and handlers of
standard commercial varieties.
In its initial regulatory flexibility
analysis, USDA found that this change
represents a small increase in costs for
producers and handlers of UglyRipe
tomatoes, primarily from costs
associated with developing and
maintaining the IP program. As
discussed above, this rule should not
significantly impact demand or price for
standard commercial varieties.
Consequently, we do not agree that this
action will negatively impact growers
and handlers of standard commercial
varieties.
Accordingly, no changes will be made
to the rule as proposed, based on
comments received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
matter presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
It is further found that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register (5
U.S.C. 553) because the regulatory
period will begin October 10, 2006.
Also, a 60-day comment period was
provided for in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tomatoes.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 966 is amended as
follows:
I
PART 966—TOMATOES GROWN IN
FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 966 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Amend § 966.323, by adding a new
paragraph (d)(5) to read as follows:
I
§ 966.323
Handling regulation.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(5) For UglyRipeTM tomatoes.
UglyRipeTM tomatoes must meet all the
requirements of this section: Provided,
That UglyRipeTM tomatoes shall be
graded and at least meet the
requirements specified for U.S. No. 2
under the U.S. Standards for Grades of
Fresh Tomatoes, except they are exempt
from the requirements that they be
reasonably well formed and not more
than slightly rough, and Provided,
Further that the UglyRipeTM tomatoes
meet the requirements of the Identity
Preservation program, Fresh Products
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: January 12, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 07–162 Filed 1–12–07; 11:58 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
E:\FR\FM\17JAR1.SGM
17JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 17, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1919-1922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-162]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 966
[Docket No. FVO6-966-1 FR]
Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Partial Exemption to the Minimum Grade
Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule provides a partial exemption to the minimum grade
requirements under the marketing order for tomatoes grown in Florida
(order). The Florida Tomato Committee (Committee) locally administers
the order. Under the order, Florida tomatoes must meet at least a U.S.
No. 2 grade before they can be shipped and sold outside the regulated
area. This rule exempts UglyRipeTM (UglyRipe) tomatoes from
the shape requirements associated with the U.S. No. 2 grade. This
change increases the volume of UglyRipe tomatoes that will meet the
order requirements, and will help increase shipments and availability
of these tomatoes for consumers.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule becomes effective January 18, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Pimental, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian Nissen, Regional Manager, Southeast Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax: (863)
325-8793, or e-mail: William.Pimental@USDA.gov, or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or e-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
[[Page 1920]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 125 and Marketing Order No. 966, both as amended (7 CFR
part 966), regulating the handling of tomatoes grown in certain
designated counties in Florida, hereinafter referred to as the
``order.'' The marketing agreement and order are effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive
effect. This rule will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable
conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule provides a partial exemption to the minimum grade
requirements prescribed under the order. The order's rules and
regulations specify that Florida tomatoes must meet at least a U.S. No.
2 grade before they can be shipped and sold outside the regulated area.
This rule exempts UglyRipe tomatoes from the shape requirements
associated with the U.S. No. 2 grade. This change increases the volume
of UglyRipe tomatoes that will meet the order requirements, and will
help increase shipments and availability of these tomatoes for
consumers. In addition, it is anticipated that this change will help
promote continued innovation within the industry.
Section 966.52 of the order provides the authority for the
establishment of grade and size requirements for Florida tomatoes. Form
and shape represent part of the elements of grade. Section 966.323 of
the order's rules and regulations specifies, in part, the minimum grade
requirements for Florida tomatoes. The current minimum grade
requirement for Florida tomatoes is a U.S. No. 2. The specifics of this
grade requirement are listed under the U.S. Standards for Grades of
Fresh Tomatoes (7 CFR 51.1855-51.1877).
The U.S. Standards for Grades of Fresh Tomatoes (Standards) specify
the criteria tomatoes must meet to grade a U.S. No. 2, including that
they must be reasonably well formed, and not more than slightly rough.
These two elements relate specifically to the shape of the tomato. The
definitions section of the Standards defines reasonably well formed as
not decidedly kidney shaped, lopsided, elongated, angular, or otherwise
decidedly deformed. The term slightly rough means that the tomato is
not decidedly ridged or grooved. This rule amends Sec. 966.323 to
exempt UglyRipe tomatoes from these shape requirements as specified
under the grade for a U.S. No. 2.
UglyRipe tomatoes are a trademarked tomato variety bred to look and
taste like an heirloom-type tomato. One of the characteristics of this
variety is its appearance. UglyRipe tomatoes are often shaped
differently from other round tomatoes. Depending on the time of year
and the weather, UglyRipe tomatoes are concave on the stem end with
deep, ridged shoulders. They can also appear kidney shaped and
lopsided. Because of this variance in shape and appearance, UglyRipe
tomatoes can have difficulty meeting the shape requirements of the U.S.
No. 2 grade.
This rule provides UglyRipe tomatoes with a partial exemption from
the grade requirements under the order. UglyRipe tomatoes are only
exempt from the shape requirements of the grade and are still required
to meet all other aspects of the U.S. No. 2 grade. UglyRipe tomatoes
also continue to be required to meet all other requirements under the
marketing order, such as size, pack and container, and inspection.
Prior to the 1998-99 season, the Committee recommended that the
minimum grade be increased from a U.S. No. 3 to a U.S. No. 2. Committee
members agree that increasing the grade requirement has been very
beneficial to the industry and in the marketing of Florida tomatoes.
Further, some Committee members have stated that a large part of the
volume of the standard commercial varieties of tomatoes which fail to
make the grade are rejected because of their shape and appearance.
Consequently, there was some industry concern that providing an
exemption for UglyRipe tomatoes could result in the shipment of U.S.
No. 3 grade tomatoes of other varieties, contrary to the objectives of
the exemption and the order.
To address this concern, the producers of UglyRipe tomatoes pursued
entry into USDA's Identity Preservation (IP) program. This program was
developed by the Agricultural Marketing Service to assist companies in
marketing products having unique traits. The program provides
independent, third-party verification of the segregation of a company's
unique product at every stage, from seed, production and processing, to
distribution. UglyRipe tomatoes were granted positive program status in
early 2006.
This partial exemption only extends to UglyRipe tomatoes covered
under the IP program. As such, this should help ensure that only
UglyRipe tomatoes are shipped under the exemption. In addition, this
exemption is contingent upon UglyRipe tomatoes continuing to meet the
requirements of the IP program.
This rule exempts UglyRipe tomatoes from the shape requirements
associated with the U.S. No. 2 grade. This change increases the volume
of UglyRipe tomatoes that will meet order requirements, and will help
increase shipments and availability of these tomatoes. In addition, it
is hoped that this change will help promote continued innovation within
the industry.
Section 8e of the Act provides that when certain domestically
produced commodities, including tomatoes, are regulated under a Federal
marketing order, imports of that commodity must meet the same or
comparable grade, size, quality, and maturity requirements. Since this
rule provides a partial exemption to the minimum grade requirements
under the domestic handling regulations, a corresponding change to the
import regulations is also needed. A final rule providing the same
partial exemption to the minimum grade requirements under the import
regulations will be issued as a separate action.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this final regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
[[Page 1921]]
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 100 producers of tomatoes in the production
area and approximately 70 handlers subject to regulation under the
marketing order. Small agricultural producers are defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) as those having annual receipts less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those
whose annual receipts are less than $6,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Based on industry and Committee data, the average annual price for
fresh Florida tomatoes during the 2004-05 season was approximately
$12.50 per 25-pound container, and fresh shipments totaled 53,025,915
25-pound cartons of tomatoes. Committee data indicates approximately 27
percent of the handlers handle 95 percent of the total volume shipped
outside the regulated area. Based on the average price, about 75
percent of handlers could be considered small businesses under SBA's
definition. In addition, based on production, grower prices as reported
by the National Agricultural Statistics Service, and the total number
of Florida tomato growers, the average annual grower revenue is below
$750,000. Thus, the majority of handlers and producers of Florida
tomatoes may be classified as small entities.
This final rule provides a partial exemption to the minimum grade
requirements for tomatoes grown in Florida. Under the order, Florida
tomatoes must meet at least a U.S. No. 2 grade before they can be
shipped and sold outside the regulated area. This final rule exempts
UglyRipe tomatoes from the shape requirements specified under the
Standards for a U.S. No. 2 grade. This change increases the volume of
UglyRipe tomatoes that will meet the order requirements, and will help
increase shipments and availability of these tomatoes for consumers.
This final rule amends the provisions of Sec. 966.323. Authority for
this action is provided in Sec. 966.52 of the order.
This change represents a small increase in costs for producers and
handlers of UglyRipe tomatoes, primarily from costs associated with
developing and maintaining the IP program. However, the majority of
facilities associated with UglyRipe tomatoes were involved with the IP
program prior to this rule and have already received a successful
audit. Therefore, the additional costs associated with this action are
those costs related to maintaining and complying with the IP program.
It is anticipated that these costs will be minimal and will be offset
by the increased sales of UglyRipe tomatoes.
Finally, UglyRipe tomatoes are still required to meet the majority
of the requirements for a U.S. No. 2 grade, and are usually priced
higher than U.S. No. 2 graded standard commercial variety tomatoes.
Therefore, this action should not have a price depressing effect on
standard varieties, and because of the difference in price, this
exemption should not have a significant impact on the market share for
standard commercial varieties of Florida tomatoes.
One alternative to this action that was considered was to not
provide an exemption from shape requirements for UglyRipe tomatoes.
This option would not have allowed for an increase in the volume of
UglyRipe tomatoes that would meet the order requirements, and would not
help increase shipment and availability of these tomatoes. Therefore,
this alternative was rejected.
This final rule provides a partial exemption to the minimum grade
requirements under the Florida tomato marketing order. Accordingly,
this rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large tomato handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies.
The AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
As noted in the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this final rule.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on June 29, 2006 (71 FR 37014). Copies of the rule were mailed
or sent via facsimile to all Committee members and tomato handlers.
Finally, the rule was made available through the Internet by USDA and
the Office of the Federal Register. A 60-day comment period ending
August 28, 2006, was provided to allow interested persons to respond to
the proposal.
Eighty-eight comments were received during the comment period in
response to the proposal. Of the comments received, 79 were in support
of the regulation and 9 were in opposition. One comment was received
after the close of the comment period.
The comments in support of the proposal expressed appreciation for
the taste of UglyRipe tomatoes, and supported a greater market
availability for UglyRipe tomatoes. Several commenters stated that
UglyRipe tomatoes compared favorably with homegrown tomatoes. Other
commenters compared the taste as being equal to local tomatoes, even in
winter when local tomatoes were not available. Several of the comments
stated that good taste was of greater importance than appearance.
Commenters also expressed that they have had difficulty in finding
UglyRipe tomatoes available for purchase and supported this rule and
its efforts to increase availability.
Nine comments were received in opposition to the proposed rule. Of
these comments, five expressed concerns regarding this proposal's
impact on orderly marketing. Four commenters stated that the current
marketing order requirements provide stability to the industry. One
commenter stated that the standards established under the order are key
to the establishment of an orderly market for Florida growers and that
this rule will weaken the industry's ability to maintain an orderly
market. Another commenter stated that the proposed rule does not
establish, maintain, or support orderly marketing conditions, but does
the exact opposite.
One of the main goals of marketing orders is to establish orderly
marketing conditions for those commodities covered under marketing
orders. As previously noted, this partial exemption only extends to
UglyRipe tomatoes. Further, this rule only provides UglyRipe tomatoes
with a partial exemption from the shape requirements of the U.S. No. 2
grade. UglyRipe tomatoes are still subject to the requirements for
maturity, ripeness, softness, development, decay, and damage as
specified under the Standards for a U.S. No. 2 grade. Even with this
partial exemption, the requirements for UglyRipe tomatoes are still
significantly higher than those for U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes.
Because this partial exemption is narrowly defined, the vast
majority of the tomatoes shipped from Florida will still meet the
requirements for a U.S. No. 2 grade. Therefore, this change will not
diminish the overall benefits of the established grade standard.
[[Page 1922]]
Consequently, this change should not have an adverse impact on the
orderly market for Florida tomatoes.
Five commenters stated that this change would allow UglyRipe
tomatoes to circumvent the requirements of the order. Two comments
declared that this rule would allow all UglyRipe tomatoes produced to
be sold outside of the regulated area. Another comment stated that this
rule would allow UglyRipe tomatoes to escape the standards applicable
to all other tomatoes.
This partial exemption will not allow UglyRipe tomatoes to
circumvent the requirements of the order, or allow all UglyRipe
tomatoes produced in Florida to be shipped outside the regulated area.
As stated above, UglyRipe tomatoes will still have to meet the majority
of the requirements for U.S. No. 2 grade tomatoes, and will have to be
inspected to ensure these requirements are met. UglyRipe tomatoes also
continue to be required to meet all other requirements under the
marketing order, such as size, pack and container, and assessment
provisions. In addition, UglyRipe tomatoes must meet the requirements
of the IP program.
Five commenters expressed concern that providing this exemption for
the UglyRipe tomato will create a loophole, which will result in the
shipment of U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes of other varieties by other
producers. One of the commenters stated that with this change, every
farmer in Florida will be selling his off shaped fruit. Another
commenter wrote that this action presents too many opportunities for
domestic growers and importers to sell tomatoes of inferior quality.
Another commenter stated that they had no doubt that efforts will be
made to market U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes that resemble UglyRipe
tomatoes.
We disagree with these comments. There are safeguards in place to
address these issues. In addition to the existing inspection
requirements, and compliance efforts, this partial exemption only
extends to UglyRipe tomatoes covered under the IP program. This program
was developed by AMS and provides independent, third-party verification
of the segregation of a company's product at every stage, from seed,
production and processing, to distribution. This will help ensure that
only UglyRipe tomatoes are shipped using this partial exemption, as
only handlers covered under the IP program will be allowed to pack
under the exemption. Further, USDA plans to closely monitor compliance
with this exemption.
Three commenters stated that this rule will have a negative
economic impact on the tomato industry. One commenter stated that this
rule will cause a market share loss and loss of sales. Another comment
states that this will increase supply, which will negatively affect
price.
We disagree because this partial exemption is so narrowly defined,
and only applies to UglyRipe tomatoes, it should not result in a
significant increase in the overall supply of tomatoes. Also, this
action should not have a significant impact on price. Prior to the
1998-99 season, the Committee recommended that the minimum grade be
increased from a U.S. No. 3 to a U.S. No. 2. The reason for this action
was that U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes were having a price depressing
effect on the market. This is because U.S. No. 3 grade tomatoes of
standard commercial varieties sell at prices below those for U.S. No. 2
grade tomatoes. However, in the case of UglyRipe tomatoes, they are
still required to meet the majority of the requirements for a U.S. No.
2 grade, and are usually priced higher than U.S. No. 2 graded standard
commercial variety tomatoes. Therefore this action should not have a
price depressing effect on standard varieties, and because of the
difference in price this exemption should not have a significant impact
on the market share for standard commercial varieties of Florida
tomatoes.
Two commenters also stated that this regulation would have a
negative impact on small growers. The commenters stated that when USDA
did its initial regulatory flexibility analysis USDA only considered
the impact on producers and handlers of UglyRipe tomatoes. The
commenters stated that this rule would have a negative impact on small
producers and handlers of standard commercial varieties.
In its initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA found that
this change represents a small increase in costs for producers and
handlers of UglyRipe tomatoes, primarily from costs associated with
developing and maintaining the IP program. As discussed above, this
rule should not significantly impact demand or price for standard
commercial varieties. Consequently, we do not agree that this action
will negatively impact growers and handlers of standard commercial
varieties.
Accordingly, no changes will be made to the rule as proposed, based
on comments received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant matter presented, including the
information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
It is further found that good cause exists for not postponing the
effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553) because the regulatory period will
begin October 10, 2006. Also, a 60-day comment period was provided for
in the proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Tomatoes.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 966 is amended as
follows:
PART 966--TOMATOES GROWN IN FLORIDA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 966 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Amend Sec. 966.323, by adding a new paragraph (d)(5) to read as
follows:
Sec. 966.323 Handling regulation.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(5) For UglyRipeTM tomatoes. UglyRipeTM
tomatoes must meet all the requirements of this section: Provided, That
UglyRipeTM tomatoes shall be graded and at least meet the
requirements specified for U.S. No. 2 under the U.S. Standards for
Grades of Fresh Tomatoes, except they are exempt from the requirements
that they be reasonably well formed and not more than slightly rough,
and Provided, Further that the UglyRipeTM tomatoes meet the
requirements of the Identity Preservation program, Fresh Products
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA.
* * * * *
Dated: January 12, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 07-162 Filed 1-12-07; 11:58 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P