Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; VOC RACT for Perdue Farms, Inc., 1291-1292 [E7-252]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of the establishment of VOC RACT for
Perdue Farms, Inc., located at 6906 Zion
Church Road, Wicomico County,
Maryland. The formal SIP revision
(#05–04) was submitted by the
Maryland Department of the
Environment (MDE) on May 31, 2005.
Specific requirements of the SIP
revision and the rationale for EPA’s
proposed action are explained in the
NPR and will not be restated here. On
August 9, 2005, EPA received an
adverse comment on its July 29, 2005
NPR. A summary of the comment
submitted and EPA’s response is
provided in Section II of this document.
*
[FR Doc. E7–250 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2005–MD–0009; FRL–
8267–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; VOC RACT for Perdue
Farms, Inc.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a revision to
the Maryland State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The revision pertains to a Consent
Order establishing volatile organic
compound (VOC) reasonably available
control technology (RACT) for Perdue
Farms, Incorporated. EPA is approving
these revisions in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
SUMMARY:
This final rule is
effective on February 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2005–MD–
0009. All documents in the docket are
listed in the www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
Quinto, (215) 814–2182, or by e-mail at
quinto.rose@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
EFFECTIVE DATE:
I. Background
On July 29, 2005 (70 FR 43817), EPA
published a notice of proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:19 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
II. Summary of Public Comments and
EPA Responses
Comment: A commenter states that
the annual limit is inappropriate
because it is not calculated on a rolling
basis. Specifically, the VOC limit of 0.3
gallons per ton of soybean processes in
a calendar year requires calculation of
compliance on a rolling 12-month basis.
Response: EPA disagrees with this
comment. Perdue Farms, Inc. is required
by their Title V Operating Permit No.
24–045–00042, issued on August 1,
2005, to report their compliance with
the RACT VOC limit of 0.3 gallons per
ton on soybeans processed to MDE on
a rolling 12-month period (Section 5.5,
Reporting Requirements). This is
consistent with the requirements of
MDE (COMAR 26.11.19.02,
Applicability, Determining Compliance,
Reporting, and General Requirements)
and with 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGGG,
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants: Solvent
Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production,
which require these sources to
determine compliance with annual VOC
emission limits on a rolling 12-month
period.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the Consent Order
establishing VOC RACT for Perdue
Farms, Inc. located in Wicomico
County, Maryland submitted on May 31,
2005. EPA is approving this SIP
submittal because MDE established and
imposed requirements in accordance
with the criteria set forth in SIPapproved regulations for imposing
RACT. MDE has also imposed
recordkeeping, monitoring, and testing
requirements on this source sufficient to
determine compliance with these
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1291
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal requirement, and does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established
in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
1292
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 804
exempts from section 801 the following
types of rules: (1) Rules of particular
applicability; (2) rules relating to agency
management or personnel; and (3) rules
of agency organization, procedure, or
practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of non-agency
parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not
required to submit a rule report
regarding today’s action under section
801 because this is a rule of particular
applicability establishing sourcespecific requirements for one named
source.
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 12, 2007.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action,
pertaining to a Consent Order
establishing VOC RACT for Perdue
Farms, Inc. located in Wicomico
County, Maryland, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: January 4, 2007.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
I
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V—Maryland
2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph
(d) is amended by adding an entry for
Perdue Farms, Inc. at the end of the
table to read as follows:
I
§ 52.1070
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MARYLAND SOURCE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
State effective
date
Name of source
Permit number/type
*
*
Perdue Farms, Inc .................................
*
*
Consent Order ......................................
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–252 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R05–OAR–2006–0399; FRL–8267–9]
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Determination of Attainment, Approval
and Promulgation of Implementation
Plans and Designation of Areas for Air
Quality Planning Purposes; Indiana;
Redesignation of the Allen County 8hour Ozone Nonattainment Area to
Attainment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On May 30, 2006, the Indiana
Department of Environmental
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:19 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
*
02/01/05
Management (IDEM), submitted a
request to redesignate the Allen County,
Indiana, (Fort Wayne) nonattainment
area to attainment of the 8-hour ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). In this submittal, IDEM also
requested EPA approval of an Indiana
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision containing a 14-year
maintenance plan for Allen County.
EPA is making a determination that the
Allen County, Indiana ozone
nonattainment area has attained the 8hour ozone NAAQS. This determination
is based on three years of complete,
quality-assured ambient air quality
monitoring data for the 2003–2005
ozone seasons that demonstrate that the
8-hour ozone NAAQS has been attained
in the area. Quality-assured monitoring
data for 2006 show that the area
continues to attain the standard. EPA is
also approving the request to
redesignate the area to attainment for
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA approval date
Additional
explanation
*
01/11/07 [Insert page
number where the document begins].
*
52.1070(d)(1)
the 8-hour ozone standard. EPA’s
approval of the 8-hour ozone
redesignation request is based on its
determination that Allen County,
Indiana has met the criteria for
redesignation to attainment specified in
the Clean Air Act (CAA). EPA is also
approving as a SIP revision the State’s
maintenance plan for the area. Further,
EPA is approving, for purposes of
transportation conformity, the motor
vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) for
the year 2020 that are contained in the
14-year, 8-hour ozone maintenance plan
for Allen County.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
February 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R05–OAR–2006–0399. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 7 (Thursday, January 11, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1291-1292]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-252]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2005-MD-0009; FRL-8267-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; VOC RACT for Perdue Farms, Inc.
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a revision to the Maryland State
Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision pertains to a Consent Order
establishing volatile organic compound (VOC) reasonably available
control technology (RACT) for Perdue Farms, Incorporated. EPA is
approving these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective on February 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2005-MD-0009. All documents in the docket are listed
in the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment,
1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by e-
mail at quinto.rose@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On July 29, 2005 (70 FR 43817), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of the establishment of VOC RACT for Perdue Farms, Inc., located at
6906 Zion Church Road, Wicomico County, Maryland. The formal SIP
revision (05-04) was submitted by the Maryland Department of
the Environment (MDE) on May 31, 2005. Specific requirements of the SIP
revision and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in
the NPR and will not be restated here. On August 9, 2005, EPA received
an adverse comment on its July 29, 2005 NPR. A summary of the comment
submitted and EPA's response is provided in Section II of this
document.
II. Summary of Public Comments and EPA Responses
Comment: A commenter states that the annual limit is inappropriate
because it is not calculated on a rolling basis. Specifically, the VOC
limit of 0.3 gallons per ton of soybean processes in a calendar year
requires calculation of compliance on a rolling 12-month basis.
Response: EPA disagrees with this comment. Perdue Farms, Inc. is
required by their Title V Operating Permit No. 24-045-00042, issued on
August 1, 2005, to report their compliance with the RACT VOC limit of
0.3 gallons per ton on soybeans processed to MDE on a rolling 12-month
period (Section 5.5, Reporting Requirements). This is consistent with
the requirements of MDE (COMAR 26.11.19.02, Applicability, Determining
Compliance, Reporting, and General Requirements) and with 40 CFR 63
Subpart GGGG, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants:
Solvent Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production, which require these
sources to determine compliance with annual VOC emission limits on a
rolling 12-month period.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the Consent Order establishing VOC RACT for Perdue
Farms, Inc. located in Wicomico County, Maryland submitted on May 31,
2005. EPA is approving this SIP submittal because MDE established and
imposed requirements in accordance with the criteria set forth in SIP-
approved regulations for imposing RACT. MDE has also imposed
recordkeeping, monitoring, and testing requirements on this source
sufficient to determine compliance with these requirements.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement
[[Page 1292]]
for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no
authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It
would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews
a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that
otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule
does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Section 804 exempts from section 801 the following types
of rules: (1) Rules of particular applicability; (2) rules relating to
agency management or personnel; and (3) rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice that do not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). EPA is not required
to submit a rule report regarding today's action under section 801
because this is a rule of particular applicability establishing source-
specific requirements for one named source.
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 12, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action, pertaining to a Consent Order establishing
VOC RACT for Perdue Farms, Inc. located in Wicomico County, Maryland,
may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements.
(See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: January 4, 2007.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (d) is amended by adding an
entry for Perdue Farms, Inc. at the end of the table to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
EPA-Approved Maryland Source-Specific Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permit number/ State Additional
Name of source type effective date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Perdue Farms, Inc............ Consent Order.. 02/01/05 01/11/07 [Insert page number 52.1070(d)(1)
where the document begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-252 Filed 1-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P