Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Control of Volatile Organic Compounds From Medical Device Manufacturing, 1289-1291 [E7-250]
Download as PDF
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
District, Bridge Branch Office, One
South Street, New York, New York,
1004, between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is (212)
668–7165. The First Coast Guard
District Bridge Branch Office maintains
the public docket for this temporary
deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy
Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast
Guard District, at (212) 668–7195.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Amtrak Bridge, across Shaw Cove at
mile 0.0, at New London, Connecticut,
has a vertical clearance in the closed
position of 3 feet at mean high water
and 6 feet at mean low water. The
existing drawbridge operation
regulations are listed in 33 CFR 117.223.
The owner of the bridge, the National
Railroad Passenger Corporation,
(Amtrak), requested a temporary
deviation to facilitate scheduled bridge
maintenance, replacement of the rail
lifting equipment. The bridge will not
be able to open while the bridge
maintenance is underway.
The normal waterway users are
predominantly recreational vessels that
do not operate during the winter months
this deviation will be in effect. The only
oil facility, DDLC Energy, and the few
local fishing vessel operators that
operate during the winter were
contacted regarding this deviation and
have agreed to this temporary bridge
opening schedule.
Under this temporary deviation, the
Amtrak Bridge shall operate as follows:
The bridge shall open on signal from
January 5, 2007 through February 23,
2007, between 5 a.m. and 5:20 a.m. and
between 12:45 p.m. and 1:05 p.m., daily
after at least a 4-hour advance notice is
given.
From February 24, 2007 through
February 25, 2007, the draw shall open
at any time after at least an 8-hour
advance notice is given.
The bridge shall open on signal from
February 26, 2007 through March 30,
2007, between 5 a.m. and 5:20 a.m.,
12:45 p.m. and 1:05 p.m. and between
5:15 p.m. and 5:35 p.m., daily after at
least a 4-hour advance notice is given.
The bridge shall open at any time for
DDLC Energy oil delivery vessels after at
least a 24-hour advance notice is given.
The contact information for providing
the advance notice for bridge openings
shall be via marine radio channel 123 or
by calling (860) 446–3959/3943.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c),
this work will be performed with all due
speed in order to return the bridge to
normal operation as soon as possible.
Should the bridge maintenance
authorized by this temporary deviation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:21 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
1289
be completed before the end of the
effective period published in this notice,
the Coast Guard will rescind the
remainder of this temporary deviation,
and the bridge shall be returned to its
normal operating schedule. Notice of
the above action shall be provided to the
public in the Local Notice to Mariners
and the Federal Register, where
practicable.
This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Miller, (215) 814–2068, or by email at miller.linda@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: January 3, 2007.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E7–239 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
I. Background
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0638; FRL–8267–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Control of Volatile Organic
Compounds From Medical Device
Manufacturing
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Maryland Department
of the Environment. This revision
pertains to the control of volatile
organic compounds from medical
device manufacturing. EPA is approving
this revision in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is
effective on February 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0638. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site.
Although listed in the electronic docket,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
On May 31, 2006 and July 5, 2006, the
State of Maryland submitted a revision
to the State Implementation Plan (SIP).
The revision (#06–04) establishes the
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) requirement for
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) for
medical device manufacturing. Medical
Device manufacturing includes the
manufacturing of hypodermic products,
syringes, catheters, blood handling and
other medical devices. EPA proposed
approval of the SIP revision on October
10, 2006 (71 FR 59413).
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The revision establishes the
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) requirement for
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) for
medical device manufacturing
installations that emit or have the
potential to emit, 100 pounds or more
per day of VOC emissions.
Other specific requirements of the
provisions of COMAR 26.11.19.31 and
the rationale for EPA’s proposed action
are explained in the NPR and will not
be restated here. No public comments
were received on the NPR.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the VOC RACT
requirements for medical device
manufacturing including the
manufacture of hypodermic products,
syringes, catheters, blood handling and
other medical devices as a revision to
the Maryland SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
1290
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104–4). This rule also does
not have tribal implications because it
will not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal requirement, and does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established
in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA(s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
Dated: January 4, 2007.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 12, 2007.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action to
approve VOC RACT requirements for
medical device manufacturing may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
I
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V—Maryland
2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by adding an entry for
COMAR 26.11.19.31 to read as follows:
I
§ 52.1070
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA—APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE MARYLAND SIP
Code of Maryland administrative regulations (COMAR) citation
*
*
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 10, 2007
*
Jkt 211001
*
Additional explanation/ citation at 40 CFR 52.1100
*
*
Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes
*
*
Control of Volatile Organic Compounds from
Medical Device Manufacturing.
*
EPA approval date
*
*
26.11.19
*
26.11.19.31 ...............
State effective
date
Title/subject
PO 00000
*
6/5/06
*
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
*
*
1/11/07 [Insert page number where the document
begins]
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
*
11JAR1
*
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of
Maryland. The NPR proposed approval
of the establishment of VOC RACT for
Perdue Farms, Inc., located at 6906 Zion
Church Road, Wicomico County,
Maryland. The formal SIP revision
(#05–04) was submitted by the
Maryland Department of the
Environment (MDE) on May 31, 2005.
Specific requirements of the SIP
revision and the rationale for EPA’s
proposed action are explained in the
NPR and will not be restated here. On
August 9, 2005, EPA received an
adverse comment on its July 29, 2005
NPR. A summary of the comment
submitted and EPA’s response is
provided in Section II of this document.
*
[FR Doc. E7–250 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2005–MD–0009; FRL–
8267–6]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; VOC RACT for Perdue
Farms, Inc.
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
EPA is approving a revision to
the Maryland State Implementation Plan
(SIP). The revision pertains to a Consent
Order establishing volatile organic
compound (VOC) reasonably available
control technology (RACT) for Perdue
Farms, Incorporated. EPA is approving
these revisions in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
SUMMARY:
This final rule is
effective on February 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2005–MD–
0009. All documents in the docket are
listed in the www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for
public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Maryland Department of
the Environment, 1800 Washington
Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore,
Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose
Quinto, (215) 814–2182, or by e-mail at
quinto.rose@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
EFFECTIVE DATE:
I. Background
On July 29, 2005 (70 FR 43817), EPA
published a notice of proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:19 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
II. Summary of Public Comments and
EPA Responses
Comment: A commenter states that
the annual limit is inappropriate
because it is not calculated on a rolling
basis. Specifically, the VOC limit of 0.3
gallons per ton of soybean processes in
a calendar year requires calculation of
compliance on a rolling 12-month basis.
Response: EPA disagrees with this
comment. Perdue Farms, Inc. is required
by their Title V Operating Permit No.
24–045–00042, issued on August 1,
2005, to report their compliance with
the RACT VOC limit of 0.3 gallons per
ton on soybeans processed to MDE on
a rolling 12-month period (Section 5.5,
Reporting Requirements). This is
consistent with the requirements of
MDE (COMAR 26.11.19.02,
Applicability, Determining Compliance,
Reporting, and General Requirements)
and with 40 CFR 63 Subpart GGGG,
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants: Solvent
Extraction for Vegetable Oil Production,
which require these sources to
determine compliance with annual VOC
emission limits on a rolling 12-month
period.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the Consent Order
establishing VOC RACT for Perdue
Farms, Inc. located in Wicomico
County, Maryland submitted on May 31,
2005. EPA is approving this SIP
submittal because MDE established and
imposed requirements in accordance
with the criteria set forth in SIPapproved regulations for imposing
RACT. MDE has also imposed
recordkeeping, monitoring, and testing
requirements on this source sufficient to
determine compliance with these
requirements.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1291
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not
have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal requirement, and does not alter
the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established
in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
E:\FR\FM\11JAR1.SGM
11JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 7 (Thursday, January 11, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1289-1291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-250]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0638; FRL-8267-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Control of Volatile Organic Compounds From Medical Device
Manufacturing
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment. This revision
pertains to the control of volatile organic compounds from medical
device manufacturing. EPA is approving this revision in accordance with
the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
EFFECTIVE DATE: This final rule is effective on February 12, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2006-0638. All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Maryland Department of the Environment,
1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland 21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Miller, (215) 814-2068, or by e-
mail at miller.linda@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 31, 2006 and July 5, 2006, the State of Maryland submitted a
revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP). The revision
(06-04) establishes the Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) requirement for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) for
medical device manufacturing. Medical Device manufacturing includes the
manufacturing of hypodermic products, syringes, catheters, blood
handling and other medical devices. EPA proposed approval of the SIP
revision on October 10, 2006 (71 FR 59413).
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The revision establishes the Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) requirement for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) for
medical device manufacturing installations that emit or have the
potential to emit, 100 pounds or more per day of VOC emissions.
Other specific requirements of the provisions of COMAR 26.11.19.31
and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPR
and will not be restated here. No public comments were received on the
NPR.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the VOC RACT requirements for medical device
manufacturing including the manufacture of hypodermic products,
syringes, catheters, blood handling and other medical devices as a
revision to the Maryland SIP.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves
[[Page 1290]]
state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA(s role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 12, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action to approve VOC RACT requirements for
medical device manufacturing may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: January 4, 2007.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by adding an
entry for COMAR 26.11.19.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA--Approved Regulations in the Maryland SIP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code of Maryland administrative State Additional explanation/ citation at
regulations (COMAR) citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date 40 CFR 52.1100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
26.11.19.31.................... Control of Volatile 6/5/06 1/11/07 [Insert page number where the
Organic Compounds from document begins]
Medical Device
Manufacturing.
* * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
[[Page 1291]]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-250 Filed 1-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P