Release of Lien or Discharge of Property, 1301-1308 [E7-219]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26311; Airspace
Docket No. 06–AWP–19]
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Modification of Class D
Airspace; Luke Air Force Base, AZ
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action corrects the legal
description in the notice of proposed
rulemaking that was published in the
Federal Register on December 7, 2006,
(71 FR 70909), Docket No. FAA–2006–
26311; Airspace Docket No. 06–AWP–
19.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Frances Hope, Western Terminal
Operations, System Support Specialist,
AWP–520.3, Federal Aviation
Administration, 15000 Aviation
Boulevard, Lawndale, California 90261,
telephone (310) 725–6502.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
History
On December 7, 2006, a notice of
proposed rulemaking was published in
the Federal Register (71 FR 70909),
Docket No. FAA–2006–26311; Airspace
Docket No. 06–AWP–19. This notice
proposes to modify Class D airspace at
Luke Air Force Base (LUF), AZ. This
modification is necessary to contain and
protect circling maneuvers for Category
E aircraft executing these maneuvers in
conjunction with Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at the
airport. The legal description did not
correctly describe the proposed airspace
modification. This action corrects the
legal description.
Correction to Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the changes
as described above are corrected, and
the legal description for Luke Air Force
Base, AZ, as published in the Federal
Register on December 7, 2006, (71 FR
70909), and incorporated by reference in
14 CFR 71.1, is corrected as follows:
§ 71.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Los Angeles, California, on
December 21, 2006.
Leonard A. Mobley,
Acting Area Director, Western Terminal
Operations.
[FR Doc. 07–33 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 270
[Release No. IC–27600A; File No. S7–03–
04]
RIN 3235–AJ62
Investment Company Governance;
Correction
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
In document E6–21903 beginning on
page 76618 in the issue of Thursday,
December 21, 2006, make the following
correction:
On page 76618, in the first column,
the RIN number should read as set forth
above.
Dated: January 4, 2007.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–210 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Corrected]
*
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to but not including 4,000 feet MSL
and within a 5.6-mile radius of Luke AFB
from a point intersecting the northwest
portion of the Goodyear Class D airspace
clockwise to a point intersecting the northern
portion of the Glendale Class D airspace; and
within a 4.4 mile radius of Luke AFB from
the intersection of the southern portion of the
Glendale Class D airspace clockwise to the
intersection of the Goodyear Class D airspace;
and excluding that portion within the
Glendale, AZ, and Goodyear, AZ Class D
airspace areas. This Class D airspace area is
effective during the specific dates and times
established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continually published in the
Airport/Facility Directory.
*
14:45 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[REG–159444–04]
RIN 1545–BE35
Release of Lien or Discharge of
Property
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains
proposed regulations related to release
of lien and discharge of property under
sections 6325, 6503, and 7426 of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). The
proposed regulations update existing
regulations and contain procedures for
processing a request made by a property
owner for discharge of a Federal tax lien
from his property, under section
6325(b)(4). The proposed regulations
also clarify the impact of these
procedures on sections 6503(f)(2) and
7426(a)(4) and (b)(5). The proposed
regulations reflect the enactment of
sections 6325(b)(4), 6503(f)(2), and
7426(a)(4) by the IRS Restructuring and
Reform Act of 1998.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by April 11, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–159444–04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.B.
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
DC 20044. Submissions may be handdelivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–159444–04),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20224.
Alternatively, taxpayers may submit
comments electronically to the IRS
Internet site at https://www.irs.gov/regs
or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS–REG–
159444–04).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the regulations, Debra A.
Kohn, (202) 622–7985; concerning
submissions of comments and the
hearing, Richard A. Hurst, Publications
and Regulations Specialist, at
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov or
(202) 622–7180 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed
amendments to the Procedure and
Administration Regulations (26 CFR
part 301) under sections 6325, 6503, and
AWP AZ D Phoenix, Luke AFB, AZ
[Amended]
Phoenix Luke AFB, AZ
(Lat. 33°32′06″ N., long. 112°22′59″ W.)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
1301
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
1302
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Proposed Rules
7426 of the Code. Section 6325(b)(4)
was enacted by section 3106(a) of the
IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of
1998 (RRA 1998), Public Law 105–206
(112 Stat. 685). Section 6503(f)(2) was
enacted by section 3106(b)(3) of RRA
1998. Sections 7426(a)(4) and (b)(5)
were enacted by section 3106(b)(1) of
RRA 1998. These provisions of RRA
1998 provide a statutory mechanism for
a person other than the person against
whom the underlying tax was assessed,
upon furnishing a deposit or bond, to
obtain a discharge of the Federal tax lien
from property owned by him, and for
the IRS or the courts to determine the
disposition of the deposit or bond
amount.
The provisions added by RRA 1998
were enacted in response to United
States v. Williams, 514 U.S. 527 (1995).
In Williams, the Supreme Court held
that a third party who paid another
person’s tax liability under protest had
standing to bring a civil suit for refund
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1346(a)(1), which
waives the Government’s sovereign
immunity with respect to refund suits
for Federal taxes alleged to have been
erroneously or illegally assessed or
collected. The Government argued in
Williams that section 1346(a)(1) was
intended to afford a remedy only to the
person against whom a tax is assessed,
and not a third party in this situation.
In rejecting this argument, the Supreme
Court reasoned that the plaintiff in
Williams, who was not the taxpayer and
who needed a discharge of the Federal
tax lien in order to sell her property,
had no effective remedy other than to
pay the tax giving rise to the lien and
to institute a refund suit. Sections
6325(b)(4), 6503(f)(2), and 7426(a)(4)
and (b)(5) afford such a remedy to an
owner of the property in this situation
if the owner is not the person whose
unsatisfied liability gave rise to the lien
(a third-party owner). In light of the
addition these provisions to the Code,
the continuing applicability of Williams
is extremely limited, as the IRS has
noted in other published guidance. See
Rev. Rul. 2005–50, 2005–30 I.R.B. 124
(2005).
The current Code of Federal
Regulations contains both temporary
and final regulations under sections
6325, 6503, and 7426. Neither the
temporary regulations nor the final
regulations reflect the amendments to
the Code made by RRA 1998. These
proposed regulations, if adopted as
final, would constitute permanent
regulations that would incorporate the
amendments made by RRA 1998 by
replacing the existing temporary
regulations and updating the existing
final regulations under sections 6325,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
6503, and 7426. In particular, these
proposed regulations contain
procedures for processing a request for
a certificate of discharge of a Federal tax
lien under section 6325(b)(4). In
addition, these proposed regulations
clarify the impact of these procedures
on the collection limitations period
tolling provisions of section 6503(f)(2)
and on the judicial remedy provisions of
sections 7426(a)(4) and (b)(5).
The proposed regulations also
incorporate, with updates, the language
of the existing temporary regulations
relating to release of lien under section
6325(a), while withdrawing the existing
temporary regulations. Changes to the
language of the existing temporary
regulations have been made to account
for the IRS’s acceptance of additional
forms of payment since the temporary
regulations became effective in 1983.
Although section 7805(e)(2) provides
that temporary regulations expire after
three years, this provision applies only
to temporary regulations issued after
November 20, 1988. Since the
temporary regulations relevant here
were issued prior to that date, they are
not subject to the three-year statutory
limit. The proposed regulations provide
that the existing temporary regulations
under section 6325(a) are removed as of
the date the proposed regulations
become effective as final regulations.
The existing permanent and
temporary regulations do not account
for the current organizational structure
of the IRS. The existing permanent
regulations under sections 6325 and
6503(f) employ the title ‘‘district
director,’’ in numerous instances, in
indicating the highest official of a local
office of the IRS. That title was used
under an organizational structure of the
IRS that no longer exists. In order to
account for the IRS’s current
organizational structure and to allow for
future reorganizations of the IRS, the
proposed regulations remove the title
‘‘district director’’ throughout
§§ 301.6325–1 and 301.6503(f)–1, and
replace that title with the term
‘‘appropriate official.’’ Section
301.6325–1(h) and Section 301.6503(f)–
1(c) of the proposed regulations state
that as used throughout section
301.6325–1 and section 301.6503(f)–1,
respectively, the term ‘‘appropriate
official’’ means the official or office
identified in the relevant IRS
Publication, or if such official is not so
identified, the Secretary or his delegate.
In this context, the relevant publication
is either IRS Publication 1450,
‘‘Instructions on How to Request a
Certificate of Release of Federal Tax
Lien,’’ or IRS Publication 783,
‘‘Instructions on How to Apply for a
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Certificate of Discharge of Property from
Federal Tax Lien.’’
Explanation of Provisions
I. In General
Under section 6325(a), the Secretary
shall issue a certificate of release of a
Federal tax lien within 30 days of
finding that the liability for the
underlying tax either has been fully
satisfied or has become legally
unenforceable, or if an appropriate bond
has been furnished to and accepted by
the Secretary.
Under section 6325(b)(4)(A), the
Secretary shall issue a certificate of
discharge of property from a Federal tax
lien if the owner of the property
requests the issuance of a certificate of
discharge and either deposits an amount
of money ‘‘equal to the value of the
interest of the United States (as
determined by the Secretary) in the
property’’ or furnishes an acceptable
bond in a like amount. Section
6325(b)(4)(D) renders section
6325(b)(4)(A) inapplicable ‘‘if the owner
of the property is the person whose
unsatisfied liability gave rise to the
lien.’’ This means that if undivided
interests in the property at issue are
owned by both the taxpayer and another
person, neither the taxpayer nor the
other person may obtain a discharge of
the property from the Federal tax lien
under section 6325(b)(4).
Under section 6325(b)(4)(B), the
Secretary shall refund the amount
deposited, with interest, or release the
bond furnished, ‘‘to the extent that the
Secretary determines that’’ either: (i)
The unsatisfied liability giving rise to
the lien ‘‘can be satisfied from a source
other than such property’’; or (ii) the
value of the interest of the United States
in the property ‘‘is less than the
Secretary’s prior determination of such
value.’’ Section 7426(a)(4) allows a
person who has obtained a certificate of
discharge under section 6325(b)(4) to
bring a civil action in Federal district
court against the United States ‘‘for a
determination of whether the value of
the interest of the United States (if any)
in such property is less than the value
determined by the Secretary.’’ This
action must be filed within 120 days
after the date the certificate of discharge
is issued. Section 7426(a)(4) states that
‘‘[n]o other action may be brought by
such person for such a determination.’’
Section 7426(b)(5) provides that if the
Federal district court determines that
the Secretary’s determination of the
value of the interest of the United States
in the property under section 6325(b)(4)
exceeds the value of such interest, the
court shall grant a judgment ordering a
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
refund of the deposit amount, or a
release of the bond, to the extent that
the amount furnished exceeds the value
determined by the court.
Section 6325(b)(4)(C) states that if no
action is filed under section 7426(a)(4)
within the specified 120-day period, the
Secretary shall, within 60 days after the
expiration of that period: (i) Apply the
deposit, or collect on the bond, to the
extent necessary to satisfy the liability
secured by the lien; and (ii) refund, with
interest, any portion of the deposit not
used to satisfy such liability.
Section 6503(f)(2) suspends the
running of the period provided in
section 6502 for collecting an assessed
tax liability from the time a person
becomes entitled to a certificate of
discharge under section 6325(b)(4) until
30 days after: (A) The earliest date on
which the Secretary no longer holds any
amount as a deposit or bond provided
under section 6325(b)(4) because the
deposit or bond either has been used to
satisfy the unpaid tax liability or has
been refunded or released; or (B) the
date a judgment secured under section
7426(b)(5) becomes final. Suspension of
the running of the collection limitations
period under section 6503(f)(2) applies
only with respect to the amount of the
assessment equal to the value of the
interest of the United States in the
subject property, plus interest,
penalties, and certain other additions to
tax.
II. Release of Lien
Section 6325(a) provides that the
Secretary shall issue a certificate of
release of lien within 30 days of the
satisfaction of certain conditions.
Section 301.6325–1(a)(1) and (2) of the
existing permanent regulations state that
the Secretary ‘‘may’’ issue a certificate
of release if such conditions are met.
These proposed regulations change the
word ‘‘may’’ to ‘‘shall’’ in the
appropriate instances, and incorporate
the 30-day requirement contained in the
existing temporary regulations,
consistent with section 6325(a).
Much of the remainder of the
language of § 401.6325–1(a) of the
temporary regulations is essentially the
same as the language of § 301.6325–1(a)
of the existing permanent regulations.
Therefore, the remaining language need
not be incorporated into these proposed
regulations. The language of § 401.6325–
1(b), dealing with notices of Federal tax
lien that also contain certificates of
release that become effective as of a
prescribed date, survives as an addition
to § 301.6325–1(a). The language of
§ 401.6325–1(c), defining the phrase
satisfaction of the tax liability for
purposes of section 6325(a)(1), also
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
survives as an addition to § 301.6325–
1(a). The language of § 401.6325–1(d),
defining the phrase proof of full
payment for purposes of § 401.6325–
1(a), survives as part of a new
subsection of the permanent regulations
addressing payment via credit and debit
cards and electronic funds transfers,
consistent with 26 CFR §§ 31.6302–
1(h)(8) and 301.6311–2(a). The language
of § 401.6325–1(e), dealing with Federal
tax liens listing multiple tax liabilities,
and the language of § 401.6325–1(f),
dealing with the requirements of a valid
request for a certificate of release, is
incorporated into the permanent
regulations.
III. Discharge of Property Under
Section 6325(b)(4)
A. Issuance of the Certificate of
Discharge
Section 6325(b)(4)(A) requires the
Secretary to issue a certificate of
discharge of a third-party owner’s
property from a Federal tax lien if the
third-party owner meets certain
requirements. The proposed regulations
state that a certificate of discharge must
be issued under section 6325(b)(4) if the
third-party owner submits a proper
request and either deposits an
appropriate amount or furnishes an
acceptable bond.
1. Request of Third-Party Owner
Section 301.6325–1(b)(4) provides
that a person seeking a certificate of
discharge under section 6325(b) must
submit an application in writing to the
local IRS official responsible for
collection of the tax at issue, and that
the application must contain such
information as the official may require.
Section 301.6325–1(b)(4) as currently
written applies to only certificates of
discharge under section 6325(b)(1)
through (3). The proposed regulations
extend the applicability of the language
of § 301.6325–1(b)(4) (redesignated as
§ 301.6325–1(b)(5)) to a request for a
certificate of discharge under section
6325(b)(4) and indicate that the request
should be submitted to the appropriate
IRS official or office.
New § 301.6325–1(b)(5) of the
proposed regulations states that a
request for a certificate of discharge
made by a third-party owner will be
viewed as a request under section
6325(b)(4), and not as a request made
under section 6325(b)(2), unless the
third-party owner expressly states
otherwise in writing. Similarly, any
amount the IRS receives from a thirdparty owner following a discharge
request will be viewed as a deposit
made under section 6325(b)(4)(A),
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1303
rather than as a payment under section
6325(b)(2), unless the third-party owner
in writing expressly states otherwise,
and expressly waives the right to file a
civil suit in Federal district court for a
refund of the amount received in
writing.
The waiver provisions included in the
proposed regulations generally protect
the third-party owner in that a
certificate of discharge granted under
section 6325(b)(4), unlike one granted
under section 6325(b)(2), affords a thirdparty owner the right to pursue a civil
action under section 7426(a)(4)
regarding the IRS’s determination of the
value of its lien. Amounts paid under
section 6325(b)(2) do not constitute
deposits and are immediately credited
to the taxpayer’s account once paid by
the taxpayer or another person.
2. Value of the Interest of the United
States (as Determined by the Secretary)
in the Property
Section 6325(b)(4)(A) and (D) requires
the Secretary to issue a certificate of
discharge of a third-party owner’s
property from a Federal tax lien if the
third-party owner either deposits with
the Secretary an amount ‘‘equal to the
value of the interest of the United States
(as determined by the Secretary)’’ or
furnishes a bond acceptable to the IRS
in a like amount. The proposed
regulations provide that the deposit
should be made or the bond should be
furnished to the appropriate IRS official
or office.
Section 301.6325–1(b)(2)(iii) indicates
that in determining the value of the
interest of the United States under
section 6325(b)(2), the appropriate
official ‘‘shall give consideration to the
value of the property and the amount of
all liens and encumbrances thereon
having priority over the Federal tax lien.
In determining the value of the
property, the [appropriate official] may,
in his discretion, give consideration to
the forced sale value of the property in
appropriate cases.’’
The proposed regulations state that
this language applies to the
determination of the value of the United
States’ interest in a third-party owner’s
property under section 6325(b)(4) and
provide that the appropriate official
shall make the determination.
B. Processing the Deposit
Section 6325(b)(4)(B) states that the
Secretary shall refund the amount
deposited, with interest at the
overpayment rate determined under
section 6621, and shall release the bond,
to the extent that the Secretary
determines that either: (i) The
unsatisfied tax liability giving rise to the
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1304
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Proposed Rules
lien can be satisfied from a source other
than the third-party owner’s property; or
(ii) the value of the United States’
interest in the property is less than the
Secretary’s prior determination of such
value.
The proposed regulations specify that
any request for a refund of deposit or
release of bond under section
6325(b)(4)(B) must be made in writing
and must contain the information
required by the appropriate IRS
Publication. The proposed regulations
also clarify that the phrase ‘‘unsatisfied
liability giving rise to the lien’’
contained in section 6325(b)(4)(B)(i)
refers to the entire tax liability listed on
the notice of Federal tax lien, not just
the portion of the liability equal to the
value of the United States’ interest in
the third-party owner’s property. The
proposed regulations, in addition,
indicate that the Secretary is afforded
discretion as to whether he should make
a determination, and if he does so, in
determining whether a deposit should
be refunded or a bond released under
section 6325(b)(4)(B).
As discussed in part IV of this
preamble, a third-party owner wishing
to file a civil suit for disposition of his
deposit or bond is required by section
7426(a)(4) to do so within 120 days of
issuance of the certificate of discharge.
Consistent with this limitation period
for filing suit, the proposed regulations
allow the same 120-day period for the
IRS to make any administrative
determination regarding refund of
deposit or release of bond under section
6325(b)(4)(B). During that 120-day
period, the third-party owner may
request a refund of deposit or release of
bond administratively under section
6325(b)(4)(B), file a civil suit in district
court under section 7426(a)(4), or both.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
IV. Civil Action by Person Other Than
Taxpayer for Substitution of Value
Section 7426(a)(4) provides that a
person to whom a certificate of
discharge has been issued under section
6325(b)(4) with respect to any property
may, within 120 days after the day the
certificate is issued, bring a civil action
in Federal district court for ‘‘a
determination of whether the value of
the interest of the United States (if any)
in such property is less than the value
determined by the Secretary.’’
A. Allowable Basis for Judicial
Determination
The existing permanent regulations
under section 7426 do not address the
cause of action afforded by section
7426(a)(4). The proposed regulations
clarify that the only allowable basis for
a judicial determination under section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
7426(a)(4) is that the value of the
interest of the United States in the thirdparty owner’s property is less than the
value as determined by the Secretary
under section 6325(b)(4)(A)(i). This
follows from the express language of
section 7426(a)(2) and is the case
despite the fact that an additional basis
for reevaluation of the Secretary’s
original determination—that the tax
liability underlying the lien can be
satisfied from another source—is
provided under section 6325(b)(4)(B)(i).
B. Exclusivity of Remedy
The proposed regulations emphasize
that section 7426(a)(4) provides the only
judicial remedy available to a thirdparty owner whose property is subject
to a Federal tax lien to obtain a refund
of the deposit or bond provided in
exchange for a discharge of the lien from
the property.
Section 7426(a)(4) explicitly provides
that: ‘‘No other action may be brought
by such person [to whom a certificate of
discharge is issued under section
6325(b)(4)] for such a determination.’’
Additionally, by the terms of section
7426(a)(4), a third-party owner must
obtain a certificate of discharge under
section 6325(b)(4) (and not under
section 6325(b)(2)) to have standing to
pursue the remedy offered by section
7426(a)(4).
C. No Tolling of 120-Day Period
The proposed regulations state that an
administrative request for refund of
deposit or release of bond made under
section 6325(b)(4)(B) does not affect the
running of the 120-day period for
bringing a civil suit under section
7426(a)(4). The statutory scheme makes
the standing of a third-party owner to
bring suit under section 7426(a)(4)
independent of, rather than related to,
events that might occur under section
6325(b)(4)(B). Thus, an administrative
request for refund of deposit or release
of bond under section 6325(b)(4)(B) is
not a prerequisite to filing an action
under section 7426(a)(4), and the 120day period of section 7426(a)(4) will not
be tolled by an administrative request
for refund of deposit or release of bond
made under section 6325(b)(4)(B).
D. Court’s Authority To Issue Judgment
The proposed regulations under
section 7426 address section 7426(b)(5),
which authorizes a Federal district court
to decide whether the Secretary’s
determination of the value of the United
States’ interest in a third-party owner’s
property exceeds the actual value of its
interest, and, if so, to grant a judgment
ordering refund of all or part of the
third-party owner’s deposit accordingly.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
V. Secretary’s Use of Deposit or Bond
if Judicial Action Not Filed
Section 6325(b)(4)(C) instructs the
Secretary how to process the third-party
owner’s deposit or bond if the thirdparty owner does not institute suit
under section 7426(a)(4) within the
statutorily prescribed 120-day period.
Under section 6325(b)(4)(C), the
Secretary has 60 days after expiration of
the 120-day period to: (i) Apply the
amount deposited (or collect on the
bond furnished) ‘‘to the extent necessary
to satisfy the unsatisfied liability
secured by the lien’’; and (ii) refund,
with interest at the overpayment rate,
any portion of the amount deposited
‘‘which is not used to satisfy such
liability.’’ Thus, the statute affords the
Secretary a total of 180 days after
issuing the certificate of discharge to
complete processing of the third-party
owner’s deposit or bond.
The proposed regulations specify that
the IRS may take these actions even
after 180 days have passed. Prohibiting
the IRS from either applying or
refunding the deposit once the 180-day
period has elapsed would prevent the
IRS from ever relinquishing a deposit
thereafter, in effect requiring IRS
personnel to retain amounts deposited
despite, in many cases, being aware that
the amounts should be applied to
outstanding tax liabilities or returned to
third-party owners.
However, because section
6325(b)(4)(C) reflects Congress’s intent
that the deposit or bond be processed
within 60 days after expiration of the
120-day period for bringing suit (or 180
days after the date a certificate of
discharge is issued under section
6325(b)(4)(A)), the proposed regulations
state that the deposit or bond will be
deemed to have been processed as of the
60th day after expiration of the 120-day
period for purposes of applying
payments to the taxpayer’s account.
This means that if the IRS has not either
applied or refunded any part of the
deposit within the 180-day period, the
IRS will be prohibited from charging the
taxpayer interest and penalties on an
outstanding liability to which the
deposit should have been applied under
section 6325(b)(4)(C)(i). On the other
hand, the IRS will pay the third-party
owner interest at the overpayment rate
on any refund that should have been
paid under section 6325(b)(4)(C)(ii)
within the 60-day period until the
refund is actually paid.
VI. Suspension of Running of Period of
Limitation
Section 6503(f)(2) states that in the
case of any assessment for which a lien
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Proposed Rules
was made on any property, the running
of the period for collecting the assessed
tax liability, under section 6502, shall
be suspended from the date any person
becomes entitled to a certificate of
discharge with respect to the property
under section 6325(b)(4) until the date
which is 30 days after the earlier of: (A)
The earliest date on which the Secretary
no longer holds any amount as a deposit
or bond provided under section
6325(b)(4) with respect to the property,
because the deposit or bond either has
been used to satisfy the unpaid tax or
has been refunded; or (B) the date that
a judgment secured under section
7426(b)(5) becomes final. Suspension of
the running of the collection limitations
period under section 6503(f)(2) applies
only with respect to the amount of the
assessment equal to the value of the
interest of the United States in the
subject property, plus interest, penalties
and certain other additions to tax.
The proposed regulations under
section 6503 address the suspension of
the running of the period for collecting
a tax liability provided by section
6503(f)(2).
Section 6325(b)(4)(A) provides that
the Secretary shall issue a certificate of
discharge when the third-party owner
makes a request and deposits an
appropriate amount or furnishes an
acceptable bond. The proposed
regulations state that the suspension of
the running of the collection statute of
limitations begins on the date a deposit
or bond in the amount determined by
the Secretary is received by the
appropriate official under section
6325(b)(4)(A), as that is the date the
third-party owner becomes entitled to a
certificate of discharge under that
provision.
Assuming that no judgment is
obtained under section 7426(b)(5),
section 6503(f)(2)(A) ties the end of the
period for suspension of the running of
the collection statute to the ultimate
disposition of the third-party owner’s
deposit or bond, which is addressed by
section 6325(b)(4)(B) and (C). The
proposed regulations state that the
suspension ends 30 days after the date
the appropriate official no longer holds
the deposit or bond by reason of taking
actions prescribed under section
6325(b)(4)(B) and (C).
Because section 6325(b)(4)(C)
contemplates that the deposit or bond
will be processed within 60 days after
the expiration of 120 days after the date
the Secretary issues the certificate of
discharge, as discussed in the previous
section, the regulations state that the
deposit or bond is deemed processed no
later than that date for purposes of
section 6503(f)(2)(A). This means that if
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
the deposit or bond is not processed
within the 180-day period, the running
of the collection statute ceases to be
suspended as of 90 days (60 days + the
30 days afforded by section 6503(f)(2))
after the 120-day period ends. Thus, the
period for collection resumes running
under section 6503(f)(2)(A) 31 days after
the 180 days have passed.
Section 6503(f)(2)(B) ties the end of
the suspension period to the finality of
a judgment obtained under section
7426(b)(5). The proposed regulations
state that if a judgment is obtained
under section 7426(b)(5), the suspension
of the running of the collection statute
ends 30 days after all appeals of that
judgment, if any, have been exhausted.
Proposed Effective Date
These regulations are proposed to
apply to any release of lien or discharge
of property that is requested after the
date that these regulations are published
as final regulations in the Federal
Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice
of proposed rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a
regulatory assessment is not required. It
also has been determined that section
553(b) of the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply
to these regulations, and because these
regulations do not impose collection of
information on small entities, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice
of proposed rulemaking will be
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Comments and Requests for Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
written comments (a signed original and
eight (8) copies) or electronic comments
that are timely submitted to the IRS. The
IRS and Treasury Department request
comments on the clarity of the proposed
rules and how they may be made easier
to understand. All comments will be
available for public inspection and
copying. A public hearing will be
scheduled if requested in writing by any
person that timely submits written
comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date, time, and
place for the public hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1305
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Debra A. Kohn of the
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
However, other personnel from the IRS
and Treasury Department participated
in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 301 continues to read, in part,
as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 301.6325–1 is
amended as follows:
1. Paragraphs (a), (b)(1)(i), (b)(2)(i),
and (b)(2)(ii) are revised.
2. Paragraph (b)(2)(iii) is redesignated
as paragraph (b)(6) and revised.
3. Paragraph (b)(4) is redesignated as
paragraph (b)(5) and revised.
4. A new paragraph (b)(4) is added.
5. Paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) are
amended by removing the language
‘‘district director’’ and adding the
language ‘‘appropriate official’’ in its
place, wherever it appears.
6. The first sentence of paragraph
(d)(1) is amended by removing the
language ‘‘A district director’’ and
adding the language ‘‘The appropriate
official’’ in its place, by removing the
word ‘‘Code’’ and adding the language
‘‘Internal Revenue Code’’ in its place,
and by removing the language ‘‘the
district director’’ and adding the
language ‘‘the appropriate official’’ in its
place. The third sentence is amended by
removing the language ‘‘a district
director’’ and adding the language ‘‘the
appropriate official’’ in its place, and
removing the language ‘‘the district
director’’ and adding ‘‘the appropriate
official’’ in its place.
7. Paragraph (d)(2)(i) is amended by
removing the language ‘‘A district
director’’ and adding the language ‘‘The
appropriate official’’ in its place, by
removing the word ‘‘Code’’ and adding
the language ‘‘Internal Revenue Code’’
in its place, and by removing the
language ‘‘the district director’’ and
adding the language ‘‘the appropriate
official’’ in its place.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1306
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Proposed Rules
8. Paragraph (d)(2)(ii), Examples 1
through 4, are amended by removing the
language ‘‘district director’’ and adding
the language ‘‘appropriate official’’ in its
place, wherever it appears.
9. Paragraphs (d)(3) and (d)(4) are
amended by removing the language
‘‘district director’’ and adding the
language ‘‘appropriate official’’ in its
place, wherever it appears.
10. The first sentence of paragraph (e)
is amended by removing the language ‘‘a
district director’’ and adding the
language ‘‘the appropriate official’’ in its
place, and by removing the language
‘‘the district director’’ and adding the
language ‘‘the appropriate official’’ in its
place. The third and fourth sentences
are amended by removing the language
‘‘district director’’ and adding the
language ‘‘appropriate official’’ in its
place.
11. Paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2)(i) are
amended by removing the language ‘‘a
district director’’ and adding the
language ‘‘the appropriate official’’ in its
place, paragraph (f)(2)(i)(b) is amended
by removing the language ‘‘the district
director’’ and adding the language ‘‘the
appropriate official’’ in its place, and
paragraph (f)(3) is amended by removing
the word ‘‘Code’’ and adding the
language ‘‘Internal Revenue Code’’ in its
place.
12. Paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) are
added.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
§ 301.6325–1
of property.
Release of lien or discharge
(a) Release of lien—(1) Liability
satisfied or unenforceable. The
appropriate official shall issue a
certificate of release for a filed notice of
Federal tax lien, no later than 30 days
after the date on which he finds that the
entire tax liability listed in such notice
of Federal tax lien either has been fully
satisfied (as defined in paragraph (a)(4)
of this section) or has become legally
unenforceable. In all cases, the liability
for the payment of the tax continues
until satisfaction of the tax in full or
until the expiration of the statutory
period for collection, including such
extension of the period for collection as
is agreed to.
(2) Bond accepted. The appropriate
official shall issue a certificate of release
of any tax lien if he is furnished and
accepts a bond that is conditioned upon
the payment of the amount assessed
(together with all interest in respect
thereof), within the time agreed upon in
the bond, but not later than 6 months
before the expiration of the statutory
period for collection, including any
agreed upon extensions. For provisions
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
relating to bonds, see sections 7101 and
7102 and §§ 301.7101–1 and 301.7102–
1.
(3) Certificate of release for a lien
which has become legally
unenforceable. The appropriate official
shall have the authority to file a notice
of Federal tax lien which also contains
a certificate of release pertaining to
those liens which become legally
unenforceable. Such release will
become effective as a release as of a date
prescribed in the document containing
the notice of Federal tax lien and
certificate of release.
(4) Satisfaction of tax liability. For
purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of this
section, satisfaction of the tax liability
occurs when—
(i) The appropriate official determines
that the entire tax liability listed in a
notice of Federal tax lien has been fully
satisfied. Such determination will be
made as soon as practicable after tender
of payment; or
(ii) The taxpayer provides the
appropriate official with proof of full
payment (as defined in paragraph (a)(5)
of this section) with respect to the entire
tax liability listed in a notice of Federal
tax lien together with the information
and documents set forth in paragraph
(a)(7) of this section. See paragraph
(a)(6) of this section if more than one tax
liability is listed in a notice of Federal
tax lien.
(5) Proof of full payment. As used in
paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section, the
term proof of full payment means—
(i) An internal revenue cashier’s
receipt reflecting full payment of the tax
liability in question;
(ii) A canceled check in an amount
sufficient to satisfy the tax liability for
which the release is being sought;
(iii) A record, made in accordance
with procedures prescribed by the
Commissioner, of proper payment of the
tax liability by credit or debit card or by
electronic funds transfer; or
(iv) Any other manner of proof
acceptable to the appropriate official.
(6) Notice of a Federal tax lien which
lists multiple liabilities. When a notice
of Federal tax lien lists multiple tax
liabilities, the appropriate official shall
issue a certificate of release when all of
the tax liabilities listed in the notice of
Federal tax lien have been fully satisfied
or have become legally unenforceable.
In addition, if the taxpayer requests that
a certificate of release be issued with
respect to one or more tax liabilities
listed in the notice of Federal tax lien
and such liability has been fully
satisfied or has become legally
unenforceable, the appropriate official
shall issue a certificate of release. For
example, if a notice of Federal tax lien
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
lists two separate liabilities and one of
the liabilities is satisfied, the taxpayer
may request the issuance of a certificate
of release with respect to the satisfied
tax liability and the appropriate official
shall issue a release.
(7) Taxpayer requests. A request for a
certificate of release with respect to a
notice of Federal tax lien shall be
submitted in writing to the appropriate
official. The request shall contain the
information required in the appropriate
IRS Publication.
(b) Discharge of specific property from
the lien—(1) Property double the
amount of the liability. (i) The
appropriate official may, in his
discretion, issue a certificate of
discharge of any part of the property
subject to a Federal tax lien imposed
under chapter 64 of the Internal
Revenue Code if he determines that the
fair market value of that part of the
property remaining subject to the
Federal tax lien is at least double the
sum of the amount of the unsatisfied
liability secured by the Federal tax lien
and of the amount of all other liens
upon the property which have priority
over the Federal tax lien. In general, fair
market value is that amount which one
ready and willing but not compelled to
buy would pay to another ready and
willing but not compelled to sell the
property.
*
*
*
*
*
(2) Part payment; interest of United
States valueless—(i) Part payment. The
appropriate official may, in his
discretion, issue a certificate of
discharge of any part of the property
subject to a Federal tax lien imposed
under chapter 64 of the Internal
Revenue Code if there is paid over to
him in partial satisfaction of the liability
secured by the Federal tax lien an
amount determined by him to be not
less than the value of the interest of the
United States in the property to be so
discharged. In determining the amount
to be paid, the appropriate official will
take into consideration all the facts and
circumstances of the case, including the
expenses to which the Government has
been put into the matter. In no case
shall the amount to be paid be less than
the value of the interest of the United
States in the property with respect to
which the certificate of discharge is to
be issued.
(ii) Interest of the United States
valueless. The appropriate official may,
in his discretion, issue a certificate of
discharge of any part of the property
subject to the Federal tax lien if he
determines that the interest of the
United States in the property to be so
discharged has no value.
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(3) Discharge of property by
substitution of proceeds of sale. The
appropriate official may, in his
discretion, issue a certificate of
discharge of any part of the property
subject to a Federal tax lien imposed
under chapter 64 of the Internal
Revenue Code if such part of the
property is sold and, pursuant to a
written agreement with the appropriate
official, the proceeds of the sale are
held, as a fund subject to the Federal tax
liens and claims of the United States, in
the same manner and with the same
priority as the Federal tax liens or
claims had with respect to the
discharged property. This paragraph
does not apply unless the sale divests
the taxpayer of all right, title, and
interest in the property sought to be
discharged. Any reasonable and
necessary expenses incurred in
connection with the sale of the property
and the administration of the sale
proceeds shall be paid by the applicant
or from the proceeds of the sale before
satisfaction of any Federal tax liens or
claims of the United States.
(4) Right of substitution of value—(i)
Issuance of certificate of discharge to
property owner who is not the taxpayer.
If an owner of property subject to a
Federal tax lien imposed under chapter
64 of the Internal Revenue Code submits
an application for a certificate of
discharge pursuant to paragraph (b)(5)
of this section, the appropriate official
shall issue a certificate of discharge of
such property after the owner either
deposits with the appropriate official an
amount equal to the value of the interest
of the United States in the property, as
determined by the appropriate official
pursuant to paragraph (b)(6) of this
section, or furnishes an acceptable bond
in a like amount. This paragraph does
not apply if any owner of the property
is the person whose unsatisfied liability
gave rise to the Federal tax lien. Thus,
if the property is owned by both the
taxpayer and another person, neither the
taxpayer nor the other person may
obtain a certificate of discharge of the
property under this paragraph.
(ii) Refund of deposit and release of
bond. The appropriate official may, in
his discretion, determine that either the
entire unsatisfied tax liability listed on
the notice of Federal tax lien can be
satisfied from a source other than the
property sought to be discharged, or the
value of the interest in the United States
is less than the prior determination of
such value. The appropriate official
shall refund the amount deposited with
interest at the overpayment rate
determined under section 6621 or
release the bond furnished to the extent
that he makes this determination.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
(iii) Refund request. If a property
owner desires an administrative refund
of his deposit or release of the bond, the
owner shall file a request in writing
with the appropriate official. The
request shall contain such information
as the appropriate IRS Publication may
require. The request must be filed
within 120 days after the date the
certificate of discharge is issued. A
refund request made under this
paragraph neither is required nor is
effective to extend the period for filing
an action in court under section
7426(a)(4).
(iv) Internal Revenue Service’s use of
deposit if court action not filed. If no
action is filed under section 7426(a)(4)
for refund of the deposit or release of
the bond within the 120-day period
specified therein, the appropriate
official shall, within 60 days after the
expiration of the 120-day period, apply
the amount deposited or collect on such
bond to the extent necessary to satisfy
the liability listed on the notice of
Federal tax lien, and shall refund, with
interest at the overpayment rate
determined under section 6621, any
portion of the amount deposited that is
not used to satisfy the liability. If the
appropriate official has not completed
the application of the deposit to the
unsatisfied liability before the end of the
60-day period, the deposit will be
deemed to have been applied to the
unsatisfied liability as of the 60th day.
(5) Application for certificate of
discharge. Any person desiring a
certificate of discharge under this
paragraph (b) shall submit an
application in writing to the appropriate
official. The application shall contain
the information required by the
appropriate IRS Publication. For
purposes of this paragraph (b), any
application for certificate of discharge
made by a property owner who is not
the taxpayer, and any amount submitted
pursuant to the application, will be
treated as an application for discharge
and a deposit under section 6325(b)(4)
unless the owner of the property
submits a statement, in writing, that the
application is being submitted under
another paragraph of section 6325 and
not under section 6325(b)(4), and the
owner in writing waives the rights
afforded under paragraph (b)(4),
including the right to seek judicial
review.
(6) Valuation of interest of United
States. For purposes of paragraphs (b)(2)
and (b)(4) of this section, in determining
the value of the interest of the United
States in the property, or any part
thereof, with respect to which the
certificate of discharge is to be issued,
the appropriate official shall give
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1307
consideration to the value of the
property and the amount of all liens and
encumbrances thereon having priority
over the Federal tax lien. In determining
the value of the property, the
appropriate official may, in his
discretion, give consideration to the
forced sale value of the property in
appropriate cases.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) As used in this section, the term
appropriate official means either the
official or office identified in the
relevant IRS Publication or, if such
official or office is not so identified, the
Secretary or his delegate.
(i) Temporary regulations removed.
The provisions of § 401.6325–1 of this
chapter are removed on the date these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
(j) Effective date. This section applies
to any release of lien or discharge of
property that is requested after these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
Par. 3. Section 301.6503(f)–1 is
amended as follows:
1. The section heading is revised.
2. The undesignated paragraph is
designated as paragraph (a) and a
paragraph heading is added.
3. In newly designated paragraph (a),
the language ‘‘a district director’’ is
removed and the language ‘‘the
appropriate official’’ is added in its
place, the language ‘‘the district
director’’ is removed and the language
‘‘the appropriate official’’ is added in its
place, and in the Example the language
‘‘district director’’ is removed and the
language ‘‘appropriate official’’ is added
in its place, wherever it appears.
4. Paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) are
added.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 301.6503(f)–1 Suspension of running of
period of limitation; wrongful seizure of
property of third-party owner and discharge
of wrongful lien for substitution of value.
(a) Wrongful seizure. * * *
(b) Discharge of wrongful lien for
substitution of value. If a person other
than the taxpayer submits a request in
writing for a certificate of discharge for
a filed Federal tax lien under section
6325(b)(4), the running of the period of
limitations on collection after
assessment under section 6502 for any
liability listed in such notice of Federal
tax lien shall be suspended for a period
equal to the period beginning on the
date the appropriate official receives a
deposit or bond in the amount specified
in § 301.6325–1(b)(4)(i) and ending on
the date that is 30 days after the earlier
of—
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
1308
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 7 / Thursday, January 11, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
(1) The date the appropriate official
no longer holds, or is deemed to no
longer hold, within the meaning of
paragraph (b)(4)(iv) of this section, any
amount as a deposit or bond by reason
of taking such actions as prescribed in
sections 6325(b)(4)(B) and (C); or
(2) The date the judgment secured
under section 7426(b)(5) becomes final.
(c) As used in this section, the term
appropriate official means either the
official or office identified in the
relevant IRS Publication or, if such
official or office is not so identified, the
Secretary or his delegate.
(d) Effective date. This section applies
to any request for a certificate of
discharge made after these regulations
are published as final regulations in the
Federal Register.
Par. 4. In § 301.7426–1, paragraphs
(a)(4), (b)(5), and (d) are added.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
§ 301.7426–1 Civil actions by persons
other than taxpayers.
(a) * * *
(4) Substitution of value. A person
who obtains a certificate of discharge
under section 6325(b)(4) with respect to
any property may, within 120 days after
the day on which the certificate is
issued, bring a civil action against the
United States in a district court of the
United States for a determination of
whether the value of the interest of the
United States (if any) in such property
is less than the value determined by the
appropriate official. A civil action under
this provision shall be the exclusive
judicial remedy for a person other than
the taxpayer who obtains a certificate of
discharge for a filed notice of Federal
tax lien.
(b) * * *
(5) Substitution of value. If the court
determines that the determination by
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the appropriate official of the value of
the interest of the United States in the
property exceeds the actual value of
such interest, the court may grant a
judgment ordering a refund of the
amount deposited, or a release of the
bond, to the extent that the aggregate of
those amounts exceeds the value as
determined by the court.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(5) of this
section apply to any request for a
certificate of discharge made after these
regulations are published as final
regulations in the Federal Register.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7–219 Filed 1–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
E:\FR\FM\11JAP1.SGM
11JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 7 (Thursday, January 11, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1301-1308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-219]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 301
[REG-159444-04]
RIN 1545-BE35
Release of Lien or Discharge of Property
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations related to release
of lien and discharge of property under sections 6325, 6503, and 7426
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The proposed regulations update
existing regulations and contain procedures for processing a request
made by a property owner for discharge of a Federal tax lien from his
property, under section 6325(b)(4). The proposed regulations also
clarify the impact of these procedures on sections 6503(f)(2) and
7426(a)(4) and (b)(5). The proposed regulations reflect the enactment
of sections 6325(b)(4), 6503(f)(2), and 7426(a)(4) by the IRS
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by April 11, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-159444-04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.B. 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand-delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-
159444-04), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224. Alternatively, taxpayers may submit
comments electronically to the IRS Internet site at https://www.irs.gov/
regs or via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov (IRS-
REG-159444-04).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the regulations, Debra A.
Kohn, (202) 622-7985; concerning submissions of comments and the
hearing, Richard A. Hurst, Publications and Regulations Specialist, at
Richard.A.Hurst@irscounsel.treas.gov or (202) 622-7180 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed amendments to the Procedure and
Administration Regulations (26 CFR part 301) under sections 6325, 6503,
and
[[Page 1302]]
7426 of the Code. Section 6325(b)(4) was enacted by section 3106(a) of
the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 1998), Public Law
105-206 (112 Stat. 685). Section 6503(f)(2) was enacted by section
3106(b)(3) of RRA 1998. Sections 7426(a)(4) and (b)(5) were enacted by
section 3106(b)(1) of RRA 1998. These provisions of RRA 1998 provide a
statutory mechanism for a person other than the person against whom the
underlying tax was assessed, upon furnishing a deposit or bond, to
obtain a discharge of the Federal tax lien from property owned by him,
and for the IRS or the courts to determine the disposition of the
deposit or bond amount.
The provisions added by RRA 1998 were enacted in response to United
States v. Williams, 514 U.S. 527 (1995). In Williams, the Supreme Court
held that a third party who paid another person's tax liability under
protest had standing to bring a civil suit for refund pursuant to 28
U.S.C. 1346(a)(1), which waives the Government's sovereign immunity
with respect to refund suits for Federal taxes alleged to have been
erroneously or illegally assessed or collected. The Government argued
in Williams that section 1346(a)(1) was intended to afford a remedy
only to the person against whom a tax is assessed, and not a third
party in this situation. In rejecting this argument, the Supreme Court
reasoned that the plaintiff in Williams, who was not the taxpayer and
who needed a discharge of the Federal tax lien in order to sell her
property, had no effective remedy other than to pay the tax giving rise
to the lien and to institute a refund suit. Sections 6325(b)(4),
6503(f)(2), and 7426(a)(4) and (b)(5) afford such a remedy to an owner
of the property in this situation if the owner is not the person whose
unsatisfied liability gave rise to the lien (a third-party owner). In
light of the addition these provisions to the Code, the continuing
applicability of Williams is extremely limited, as the IRS has noted in
other published guidance. See Rev. Rul. 2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B. 124
(2005).
The current Code of Federal Regulations contains both temporary and
final regulations under sections 6325, 6503, and 7426. Neither the
temporary regulations nor the final regulations reflect the amendments
to the Code made by RRA 1998. These proposed regulations, if adopted as
final, would constitute permanent regulations that would incorporate
the amendments made by RRA 1998 by replacing the existing temporary
regulations and updating the existing final regulations under sections
6325, 6503, and 7426. In particular, these proposed regulations contain
procedures for processing a request for a certificate of discharge of a
Federal tax lien under section 6325(b)(4). In addition, these proposed
regulations clarify the impact of these procedures on the collection
limitations period tolling provisions of section 6503(f)(2) and on the
judicial remedy provisions of sections 7426(a)(4) and (b)(5).
The proposed regulations also incorporate, with updates, the
language of the existing temporary regulations relating to release of
lien under section 6325(a), while withdrawing the existing temporary
regulations. Changes to the language of the existing temporary
regulations have been made to account for the IRS's acceptance of
additional forms of payment since the temporary regulations became
effective in 1983. Although section 7805(e)(2) provides that temporary
regulations expire after three years, this provision applies only to
temporary regulations issued after November 20, 1988. Since the
temporary regulations relevant here were issued prior to that date,
they are not subject to the three-year statutory limit. The proposed
regulations provide that the existing temporary regulations under
section 6325(a) are removed as of the date the proposed regulations
become effective as final regulations.
The existing permanent and temporary regulations do not account for
the current organizational structure of the IRS. The existing permanent
regulations under sections 6325 and 6503(f) employ the title ``district
director,'' in numerous instances, in indicating the highest official
of a local office of the IRS. That title was used under an
organizational structure of the IRS that no longer exists. In order to
account for the IRS's current organizational structure and to allow for
future reorganizations of the IRS, the proposed regulations remove the
title ``district director'' throughout Sec. Sec. 301.6325-1 and
301.6503(f)-1, and replace that title with the term ``appropriate
official.'' Section 301.6325-1(h) and Section 301.6503(f)-1(c) of the
proposed regulations state that as used throughout section 301.6325-1
and section 301.6503(f)-1, respectively, the term ``appropriate
official'' means the official or office identified in the relevant IRS
Publication, or if such official is not so identified, the Secretary or
his delegate. In this context, the relevant publication is either IRS
Publication 1450, ``Instructions on How to Request a Certificate of
Release of Federal Tax Lien,'' or IRS Publication 783, ``Instructions
on How to Apply for a Certificate of Discharge of Property from Federal
Tax Lien.''
Explanation of Provisions
I. In General
Under section 6325(a), the Secretary shall issue a certificate of
release of a Federal tax lien within 30 days of finding that the
liability for the underlying tax either has been fully satisfied or has
become legally unenforceable, or if an appropriate bond has been
furnished to and accepted by the Secretary.
Under section 6325(b)(4)(A), the Secretary shall issue a
certificate of discharge of property from a Federal tax lien if the
owner of the property requests the issuance of a certificate of
discharge and either deposits an amount of money ``equal to the value
of the interest of the United States (as determined by the Secretary)
in the property'' or furnishes an acceptable bond in a like amount.
Section 6325(b)(4)(D) renders section 6325(b)(4)(A) inapplicable ``if
the owner of the property is the person whose unsatisfied liability
gave rise to the lien.'' This means that if undivided interests in the
property at issue are owned by both the taxpayer and another person,
neither the taxpayer nor the other person may obtain a discharge of the
property from the Federal tax lien under section 6325(b)(4).
Under section 6325(b)(4)(B), the Secretary shall refund the amount
deposited, with interest, or release the bond furnished, ``to the
extent that the Secretary determines that'' either: (i) The unsatisfied
liability giving rise to the lien ``can be satisfied from a source
other than such property''; or (ii) the value of the interest of the
United States in the property ``is less than the Secretary's prior
determination of such value.'' Section 7426(a)(4) allows a person who
has obtained a certificate of discharge under section 6325(b)(4) to
bring a civil action in Federal district court against the United
States ``for a determination of whether the value of the interest of
the United States (if any) in such property is less than the value
determined by the Secretary.'' This action must be filed within 120
days after the date the certificate of discharge is issued. Section
7426(a)(4) states that ``[n]o other action may be brought by such
person for such a determination.'' Section 7426(b)(5) provides that if
the Federal district court determines that the Secretary's
determination of the value of the interest of the United States in the
property under section 6325(b)(4) exceeds the value of such interest,
the court shall grant a judgment ordering a
[[Page 1303]]
refund of the deposit amount, or a release of the bond, to the extent
that the amount furnished exceeds the value determined by the court.
Section 6325(b)(4)(C) states that if no action is filed under
section 7426(a)(4) within the specified 120-day period, the Secretary
shall, within 60 days after the expiration of that period: (i) Apply
the deposit, or collect on the bond, to the extent necessary to satisfy
the liability secured by the lien; and (ii) refund, with interest, any
portion of the deposit not used to satisfy such liability.
Section 6503(f)(2) suspends the running of the period provided in
section 6502 for collecting an assessed tax liability from the time a
person becomes entitled to a certificate of discharge under section
6325(b)(4) until 30 days after: (A) The earliest date on which the
Secretary no longer holds any amount as a deposit or bond provided
under section 6325(b)(4) because the deposit or bond either has been
used to satisfy the unpaid tax liability or has been refunded or
released; or (B) the date a judgment secured under section 7426(b)(5)
becomes final. Suspension of the running of the collection limitations
period under section 6503(f)(2) applies only with respect to the amount
of the assessment equal to the value of the interest of the United
States in the subject property, plus interest, penalties, and certain
other additions to tax.
II. Release of Lien
Section 6325(a) provides that the Secretary shall issue a
certificate of release of lien within 30 days of the satisfaction of
certain conditions. Section 301.6325-1(a)(1) and (2) of the existing
permanent regulations state that the Secretary ``may'' issue a
certificate of release if such conditions are met. These proposed
regulations change the word ``may'' to ``shall'' in the appropriate
instances, and incorporate the 30-day requirement contained in the
existing temporary regulations, consistent with section 6325(a).
Much of the remainder of the language of Sec. 401.6325-1(a) of the
temporary regulations is essentially the same as the language of Sec.
301.6325-1(a) of the existing permanent regulations. Therefore, the
remaining language need not be incorporated into these proposed
regulations. The language of Sec. 401.6325-1(b), dealing with notices
of Federal tax lien that also contain certificates of release that
become effective as of a prescribed date, survives as an addition to
Sec. 301.6325-1(a). The language of Sec. 401.6325-1(c), defining the
phrase satisfaction of the tax liability for purposes of section
6325(a)(1), also survives as an addition to Sec. 301.6325-1(a). The
language of Sec. 401.6325-1(d), defining the phrase proof of full
payment for purposes of Sec. 401.6325-1(a), survives as part of a new
subsection of the permanent regulations addressing payment via credit
and debit cards and electronic funds transfers, consistent with 26 CFR
Sec. Sec. 31.6302-1(h)(8) and 301.6311-2(a). The language of Sec.
401.6325-1(e), dealing with Federal tax liens listing multiple tax
liabilities, and the language of Sec. 401.6325-1(f), dealing with the
requirements of a valid request for a certificate of release, is
incorporated into the permanent regulations.
III. Discharge of Property Under Section 6325(b)(4)
A. Issuance of the Certificate of Discharge
Section 6325(b)(4)(A) requires the Secretary to issue a certificate
of discharge of a third-party owner's property from a Federal tax lien
if the third-party owner meets certain requirements. The proposed
regulations state that a certificate of discharge must be issued under
section 6325(b)(4) if the third-party owner submits a proper request
and either deposits an appropriate amount or furnishes an acceptable
bond.
1. Request of Third-Party Owner
Section 301.6325-1(b)(4) provides that a person seeking a
certificate of discharge under section 6325(b) must submit an
application in writing to the local IRS official responsible for
collection of the tax at issue, and that the application must contain
such information as the official may require. Section 301.6325-1(b)(4)
as currently written applies to only certificates of discharge under
section 6325(b)(1) through (3). The proposed regulations extend the
applicability of the language of Sec. 301.6325-1(b)(4) (redesignated
as Sec. 301.6325-1(b)(5)) to a request for a certificate of discharge
under section 6325(b)(4) and indicate that the request should be
submitted to the appropriate IRS official or office.
New Sec. 301.6325-1(b)(5) of the proposed regulations states that
a request for a certificate of discharge made by a third-party owner
will be viewed as a request under section 6325(b)(4), and not as a
request made under section 6325(b)(2), unless the third-party owner
expressly states otherwise in writing. Similarly, any amount the IRS
receives from a third-party owner following a discharge request will be
viewed as a deposit made under section 6325(b)(4)(A), rather than as a
payment under section 6325(b)(2), unless the third-party owner in
writing expressly states otherwise, and expressly waives the right to
file a civil suit in Federal district court for a refund of the amount
received in writing.
The waiver provisions included in the proposed regulations
generally protect the third-party owner in that a certificate of
discharge granted under section 6325(b)(4), unlike one granted under
section 6325(b)(2), affords a third-party owner the right to pursue a
civil action under section 7426(a)(4) regarding the IRS's determination
of the value of its lien. Amounts paid under section 6325(b)(2) do not
constitute deposits and are immediately credited to the taxpayer's
account once paid by the taxpayer or another person.
2. Value of the Interest of the United States (as Determined by the
Secretary) in the Property
Section 6325(b)(4)(A) and (D) requires the Secretary to issue a
certificate of discharge of a third-party owner's property from a
Federal tax lien if the third-party owner either deposits with the
Secretary an amount ``equal to the value of the interest of the United
States (as determined by the Secretary)'' or furnishes a bond
acceptable to the IRS in a like amount. The proposed regulations
provide that the deposit should be made or the bond should be furnished
to the appropriate IRS official or office.
Section 301.6325-1(b)(2)(iii) indicates that in determining the
value of the interest of the United States under section 6325(b)(2),
the appropriate official ``shall give consideration to the value of the
property and the amount of all liens and encumbrances thereon having
priority over the Federal tax lien. In determining the value of the
property, the [appropriate official] may, in his discretion, give
consideration to the forced sale value of the property in appropriate
cases.''
The proposed regulations state that this language applies to the
determination of the value of the United States' interest in a third-
party owner's property under section 6325(b)(4) and provide that the
appropriate official shall make the determination.
B. Processing the Deposit
Section 6325(b)(4)(B) states that the Secretary shall refund the
amount deposited, with interest at the overpayment rate determined
under section 6621, and shall release the bond, to the extent that the
Secretary determines that either: (i) The unsatisfied tax liability
giving rise to the
[[Page 1304]]
lien can be satisfied from a source other than the third-party owner's
property; or (ii) the value of the United States' interest in the
property is less than the Secretary's prior determination of such
value.
The proposed regulations specify that any request for a refund of
deposit or release of bond under section 6325(b)(4)(B) must be made in
writing and must contain the information required by the appropriate
IRS Publication. The proposed regulations also clarify that the phrase
``unsatisfied liability giving rise to the lien'' contained in section
6325(b)(4)(B)(i) refers to the entire tax liability listed on the
notice of Federal tax lien, not just the portion of the liability equal
to the value of the United States' interest in the third-party owner's
property. The proposed regulations, in addition, indicate that the
Secretary is afforded discretion as to whether he should make a
determination, and if he does so, in determining whether a deposit
should be refunded or a bond released under section 6325(b)(4)(B).
As discussed in part IV of this preamble, a third-party owner
wishing to file a civil suit for disposition of his deposit or bond is
required by section 7426(a)(4) to do so within 120 days of issuance of
the certificate of discharge. Consistent with this limitation period
for filing suit, the proposed regulations allow the same 120-day period
for the IRS to make any administrative determination regarding refund
of deposit or release of bond under section 6325(b)(4)(B). During that
120-day period, the third-party owner may request a refund of deposit
or release of bond administratively under section 6325(b)(4)(B), file a
civil suit in district court under section 7426(a)(4), or both.
IV. Civil Action by Person Other Than Taxpayer for Substitution of
Value
Section 7426(a)(4) provides that a person to whom a certificate of
discharge has been issued under section 6325(b)(4) with respect to any
property may, within 120 days after the day the certificate is issued,
bring a civil action in Federal district court for ``a determination of
whether the value of the interest of the United States (if any) in such
property is less than the value determined by the Secretary.''
A. Allowable Basis for Judicial Determination
The existing permanent regulations under section 7426 do not
address the cause of action afforded by section 7426(a)(4). The
proposed regulations clarify that the only allowable basis for a
judicial determination under section 7426(a)(4) is that the value of
the interest of the United States in the third-party owner's property
is less than the value as determined by the Secretary under section
6325(b)(4)(A)(i). This follows from the express language of section
7426(a)(2) and is the case despite the fact that an additional basis
for reevaluation of the Secretary's original determination--that the
tax liability underlying the lien can be satisfied from another
source--is provided under section 6325(b)(4)(B)(i).
B. Exclusivity of Remedy
The proposed regulations emphasize that section 7426(a)(4) provides
the only judicial remedy available to a third-party owner whose
property is subject to a Federal tax lien to obtain a refund of the
deposit or bond provided in exchange for a discharge of the lien from
the property.
Section 7426(a)(4) explicitly provides that: ``No other action may
be brought by such person [to whom a certificate of discharge is issued
under section 6325(b)(4)] for such a determination.'' Additionally, by
the terms of section 7426(a)(4), a third-party owner must obtain a
certificate of discharge under section 6325(b)(4) (and not under
section 6325(b)(2)) to have standing to pursue the remedy offered by
section 7426(a)(4).
C. No Tolling of 120-Day Period
The proposed regulations state that an administrative request for
refund of deposit or release of bond made under section 6325(b)(4)(B)
does not affect the running of the 120-day period for bringing a civil
suit under section 7426(a)(4). The statutory scheme makes the standing
of a third-party owner to bring suit under section 7426(a)(4)
independent of, rather than related to, events that might occur under
section 6325(b)(4)(B). Thus, an administrative request for refund of
deposit or release of bond under section 6325(b)(4)(B) is not a
prerequisite to filing an action under section 7426(a)(4), and the 120-
day period of section 7426(a)(4) will not be tolled by an
administrative request for refund of deposit or release of bond made
under section 6325(b)(4)(B).
D. Court's Authority To Issue Judgment
The proposed regulations under section 7426 address section
7426(b)(5), which authorizes a Federal district court to decide whether
the Secretary's determination of the value of the United States'
interest in a third-party owner's property exceeds the actual value of
its interest, and, if so, to grant a judgment ordering refund of all or
part of the third-party owner's deposit accordingly.
V. Secretary's Use of Deposit or Bond if Judicial Action Not Filed
Section 6325(b)(4)(C) instructs the Secretary how to process the
third-party owner's deposit or bond if the third-party owner does not
institute suit under section 7426(a)(4) within the statutorily
prescribed 120-day period. Under section 6325(b)(4)(C), the Secretary
has 60 days after expiration of the 120-day period to: (i) Apply the
amount deposited (or collect on the bond furnished) ``to the extent
necessary to satisfy the unsatisfied liability secured by the lien'';
and (ii) refund, with interest at the overpayment rate, any portion of
the amount deposited ``which is not used to satisfy such liability.''
Thus, the statute affords the Secretary a total of 180 days after
issuing the certificate of discharge to complete processing of the
third-party owner's deposit or bond.
The proposed regulations specify that the IRS may take these
actions even after 180 days have passed. Prohibiting the IRS from
either applying or refunding the deposit once the 180-day period has
elapsed would prevent the IRS from ever relinquishing a deposit
thereafter, in effect requiring IRS personnel to retain amounts
deposited despite, in many cases, being aware that the amounts should
be applied to outstanding tax liabilities or returned to third-party
owners.
However, because section 6325(b)(4)(C) reflects Congress's intent
that the deposit or bond be processed within 60 days after expiration
of the 120-day period for bringing suit (or 180 days after the date a
certificate of discharge is issued under section 6325(b)(4)(A)), the
proposed regulations state that the deposit or bond will be deemed to
have been processed as of the 60th day after expiration of the 120-day
period for purposes of applying payments to the taxpayer's account.
This means that if the IRS has not either applied or refunded any part
of the deposit within the 180-day period, the IRS will be prohibited
from charging the taxpayer interest and penalties on an outstanding
liability to which the deposit should have been applied under section
6325(b)(4)(C)(i). On the other hand, the IRS will pay the third-party
owner interest at the overpayment rate on any refund that should have
been paid under section 6325(b)(4)(C)(ii) within the 60-day period
until the refund is actually paid.
VI. Suspension of Running of Period of Limitation
Section 6503(f)(2) states that in the case of any assessment for
which a lien
[[Page 1305]]
was made on any property, the running of the period for collecting the
assessed tax liability, under section 6502, shall be suspended from the
date any person becomes entitled to a certificate of discharge with
respect to the property under section 6325(b)(4) until the date which
is 30 days after the earlier of: (A) The earliest date on which the
Secretary no longer holds any amount as a deposit or bond provided
under section 6325(b)(4) with respect to the property, because the
deposit or bond either has been used to satisfy the unpaid tax or has
been refunded; or (B) the date that a judgment secured under section
7426(b)(5) becomes final. Suspension of the running of the collection
limitations period under section 6503(f)(2) applies only with respect
to the amount of the assessment equal to the value of the interest of
the United States in the subject property, plus interest, penalties and
certain other additions to tax.
The proposed regulations under section 6503 address the suspension
of the running of the period for collecting a tax liability provided by
section 6503(f)(2).
Section 6325(b)(4)(A) provides that the Secretary shall issue a
certificate of discharge when the third-party owner makes a request and
deposits an appropriate amount or furnishes an acceptable bond. The
proposed regulations state that the suspension of the running of the
collection statute of limitations begins on the date a deposit or bond
in the amount determined by the Secretary is received by the
appropriate official under section 6325(b)(4)(A), as that is the date
the third-party owner becomes entitled to a certificate of discharge
under that provision.
Assuming that no judgment is obtained under section 7426(b)(5),
section 6503(f)(2)(A) ties the end of the period for suspension of the
running of the collection statute to the ultimate disposition of the
third-party owner's deposit or bond, which is addressed by section
6325(b)(4)(B) and (C). The proposed regulations state that the
suspension ends 30 days after the date the appropriate official no
longer holds the deposit or bond by reason of taking actions prescribed
under section 6325(b)(4)(B) and (C).
Because section 6325(b)(4)(C) contemplates that the deposit or bond
will be processed within 60 days after the expiration of 120 days after
the date the Secretary issues the certificate of discharge, as
discussed in the previous section, the regulations state that the
deposit or bond is deemed processed no later than that date for
purposes of section 6503(f)(2)(A). This means that if the deposit or
bond is not processed within the 180-day period, the running of the
collection statute ceases to be suspended as of 90 days (60 days + the
30 days afforded by section 6503(f)(2)) after the 120-day period ends.
Thus, the period for collection resumes running under section
6503(f)(2)(A) 31 days after the 180 days have passed.
Section 6503(f)(2)(B) ties the end of the suspension period to the
finality of a judgment obtained under section 7426(b)(5). The proposed
regulations state that if a judgment is obtained under section
7426(b)(5), the suspension of the running of the collection statute
ends 30 days after all appeals of that judgment, if any, have been
exhausted.
Proposed Effective Date
These regulations are proposed to apply to any release of lien or
discharge of property that is requested after the date that these
regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this notice of proposed rulemaking is
not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has
been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because
these regulations do not impose collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not
apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, this notice of proposed
rulemaking will be submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small
business.
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written comments (a signed original
and eight (8) copies) or electronic comments that are timely submitted
to the IRS. The IRS and Treasury Department request comments on the
clarity of the proposed rules and how they may be made easier to
understand. All comments will be available for public inspection and
copying. A public hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by
any person that timely submits written comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, notice of the date, time, and place for the public hearing
will be published in the Federal Register.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Debra A. Kohn of the
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
However, other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income
taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read,
in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 301.6325-1 is amended as follows:
1. Paragraphs (a), (b)(1)(i), (b)(2)(i), and (b)(2)(ii) are
revised.
2. Paragraph (b)(2)(iii) is redesignated as paragraph (b)(6) and
revised.
3. Paragraph (b)(4) is redesignated as paragraph (b)(5) and
revised.
4. A new paragraph (b)(4) is added.
5. Paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) are amended by removing the
language ``district director'' and adding the language ``appropriate
official'' in its place, wherever it appears.
6. The first sentence of paragraph (d)(1) is amended by removing
the language ``A district director'' and adding the language ``The
appropriate official'' in its place, by removing the word ``Code'' and
adding the language ``Internal Revenue Code'' in its place, and by
removing the language ``the district director'' and adding the language
``the appropriate official'' in its place. The third sentence is
amended by removing the language ``a district director'' and adding the
language ``the appropriate official'' in its place, and removing the
language ``the district director'' and adding ``the appropriate
official'' in its place.
7. Paragraph (d)(2)(i) is amended by removing the language ``A
district director'' and adding the language ``The appropriate
official'' in its place, by removing the word ``Code'' and adding the
language ``Internal Revenue Code'' in its place, and by removing the
language ``the district director'' and adding the language ``the
appropriate official'' in its place.
[[Page 1306]]
8. Paragraph (d)(2)(ii), Examples 1 through 4, are amended by
removing the language ``district director'' and adding the language
``appropriate official'' in its place, wherever it appears.
9. Paragraphs (d)(3) and (d)(4) are amended by removing the
language ``district director'' and adding the language ``appropriate
official'' in its place, wherever it appears.
10. The first sentence of paragraph (e) is amended by removing the
language ``a district director'' and adding the language ``the
appropriate official'' in its place, and by removing the language ``the
district director'' and adding the language ``the appropriate
official'' in its place. The third and fourth sentences are amended by
removing the language ``district director'' and adding the language
``appropriate official'' in its place.
11. Paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2)(i) are amended by removing the
language ``a district director'' and adding the language ``the
appropriate official'' in its place, paragraph (f)(2)(i)(b) is amended
by removing the language ``the district director'' and adding the
language ``the appropriate official'' in its place, and paragraph
(f)(3) is amended by removing the word ``Code'' and adding the language
``Internal Revenue Code'' in its place.
12. Paragraphs (h), (i), and (j) are added.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 301.6325-1 Release of lien or discharge of property.
(a) Release of lien--(1) Liability satisfied or unenforceable. The
appropriate official shall issue a certificate of release for a filed
notice of Federal tax lien, no later than 30 days after the date on
which he finds that the entire tax liability listed in such notice of
Federal tax lien either has been fully satisfied (as defined in
paragraph (a)(4) of this section) or has become legally unenforceable.
In all cases, the liability for the payment of the tax continues until
satisfaction of the tax in full or until the expiration of the
statutory period for collection, including such extension of the period
for collection as is agreed to.
(2) Bond accepted. The appropriate official shall issue a
certificate of release of any tax lien if he is furnished and accepts a
bond that is conditioned upon the payment of the amount assessed
(together with all interest in respect thereof), within the time agreed
upon in the bond, but not later than 6 months before the expiration of
the statutory period for collection, including any agreed upon
extensions. For provisions relating to bonds, see sections 7101 and
7102 and Sec. Sec. 301.7101-1 and 301.7102-1.
(3) Certificate of release for a lien which has become legally
unenforceable. The appropriate official shall have the authority to
file a notice of Federal tax lien which also contains a certificate of
release pertaining to those liens which become legally unenforceable.
Such release will become effective as a release as of a date prescribed
in the document containing the notice of Federal tax lien and
certificate of release.
(4) Satisfaction of tax liability. For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)
of this section, satisfaction of the tax liability occurs when--
(i) The appropriate official determines that the entire tax
liability listed in a notice of Federal tax lien has been fully
satisfied. Such determination will be made as soon as practicable after
tender of payment; or
(ii) The taxpayer provides the appropriate official with proof of
full payment (as defined in paragraph (a)(5) of this section) with
respect to the entire tax liability listed in a notice of Federal tax
lien together with the information and documents set forth in paragraph
(a)(7) of this section. See paragraph (a)(6) of this section if more
than one tax liability is listed in a notice of Federal tax lien.
(5) Proof of full payment. As used in paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this
section, the term proof of full payment means--
(i) An internal revenue cashier's receipt reflecting full payment
of the tax liability in question;
(ii) A canceled check in an amount sufficient to satisfy the tax
liability for which the release is being sought;
(iii) A record, made in accordance with procedures prescribed by
the Commissioner, of proper payment of the tax liability by credit or
debit card or by electronic funds transfer; or
(iv) Any other manner of proof acceptable to the appropriate
official.
(6) Notice of a Federal tax lien which lists multiple liabilities.
When a notice of Federal tax lien lists multiple tax liabilities, the
appropriate official shall issue a certificate of release when all of
the tax liabilities listed in the notice of Federal tax lien have been
fully satisfied or have become legally unenforceable. In addition, if
the taxpayer requests that a certificate of release be issued with
respect to one or more tax liabilities listed in the notice of Federal
tax lien and such liability has been fully satisfied or has become
legally unenforceable, the appropriate official shall issue a
certificate of release. For example, if a notice of Federal tax lien
lists two separate liabilities and one of the liabilities is satisfied,
the taxpayer may request the issuance of a certificate of release with
respect to the satisfied tax liability and the appropriate official
shall issue a release.
(7) Taxpayer requests. A request for a certificate of release with
respect to a notice of Federal tax lien shall be submitted in writing
to the appropriate official. The request shall contain the information
required in the appropriate IRS Publication.
(b) Discharge of specific property from the lien--(1) Property
double the amount of the liability. (i) The appropriate official may,
in his discretion, issue a certificate of discharge of any part of the
property subject to a Federal tax lien imposed under chapter 64 of the
Internal Revenue Code if he determines that the fair market value of
that part of the property remaining subject to the Federal tax lien is
at least double the sum of the amount of the unsatisfied liability
secured by the Federal tax lien and of the amount of all other liens
upon the property which have priority over the Federal tax lien. In
general, fair market value is that amount which one ready and willing
but not compelled to buy would pay to another ready and willing but not
compelled to sell the property.
* * * * *
(2) Part payment; interest of United States valueless--(i) Part
payment. The appropriate official may, in his discretion, issue a
certificate of discharge of any part of the property subject to a
Federal tax lien imposed under chapter 64 of the Internal Revenue Code
if there is paid over to him in partial satisfaction of the liability
secured by the Federal tax lien an amount determined by him to be not
less than the value of the interest of the United States in the
property to be so discharged. In determining the amount to be paid, the
appropriate official will take into consideration all the facts and
circumstances of the case, including the expenses to which the
Government has been put into the matter. In no case shall the amount to
be paid be less than the value of the interest of the United States in
the property with respect to which the certificate of discharge is to
be issued.
(ii) Interest of the United States valueless. The appropriate
official may, in his discretion, issue a certificate of discharge of
any part of the property subject to the Federal tax lien if he
determines that the interest of the United States in the property to be
so discharged has no value.
[[Page 1307]]
(3) Discharge of property by substitution of proceeds of sale. The
appropriate official may, in his discretion, issue a certificate of
discharge of any part of the property subject to a Federal tax lien
imposed under chapter 64 of the Internal Revenue Code if such part of
the property is sold and, pursuant to a written agreement with the
appropriate official, the proceeds of the sale are held, as a fund
subject to the Federal tax liens and claims of the United States, in
the same manner and with the same priority as the Federal tax liens or
claims had with respect to the discharged property. This paragraph does
not apply unless the sale divests the taxpayer of all right, title, and
interest in the property sought to be discharged. Any reasonable and
necessary expenses incurred in connection with the sale of the property
and the administration of the sale proceeds shall be paid by the
applicant or from the proceeds of the sale before satisfaction of any
Federal tax liens or claims of the United States.
(4) Right of substitution of value--(i) Issuance of certificate of
discharge to property owner who is not the taxpayer. If an owner of
property subject to a Federal tax lien imposed under chapter 64 of the
Internal Revenue Code submits an application for a certificate of
discharge pursuant to paragraph (b)(5) of this section, the appropriate
official shall issue a certificate of discharge of such property after
the owner either deposits with the appropriate official an amount equal
to the value of the interest of the United States in the property, as
determined by the appropriate official pursuant to paragraph (b)(6) of
this section, or furnishes an acceptable bond in a like amount. This
paragraph does not apply if any owner of the property is the person
whose unsatisfied liability gave rise to the Federal tax lien. Thus, if
the property is owned by both the taxpayer and another person, neither
the taxpayer nor the other person may obtain a certificate of discharge
of the property under this paragraph.
(ii) Refund of deposit and release of bond. The appropriate
official may, in his discretion, determine that either the entire
unsatisfied tax liability listed on the notice of Federal tax lien can
be satisfied from a source other than the property sought to be
discharged, or the value of the interest in the United States is less
than the prior determination of such value. The appropriate official
shall refund the amount deposited with interest at the overpayment rate
determined under section 6621 or release the bond furnished to the
extent that he makes this determination.
(iii) Refund request. If a property owner desires an administrative
refund of his deposit or release of the bond, the owner shall file a
request in writing with the appropriate official. The request shall
contain such information as the appropriate IRS Publication may
require. The request must be filed within 120 days after the date the
certificate of discharge is issued. A refund request made under this
paragraph neither is required nor is effective to extend the period for
filing an action in court under section 7426(a)(4).
(iv) Internal Revenue Service's use of deposit if court action not
filed. If no action is filed under section 7426(a)(4) for refund of the
deposit or release of the bond within the 120-day period specified
therein, the appropriate official shall, within 60 days after the
expiration of the 120-day period, apply the amount deposited or collect
on such bond to the extent necessary to satisfy the liability listed on
the notice of Federal tax lien, and shall refund, with interest at the
overpayment rate determined under section 6621, any portion of the
amount deposited that is not used to satisfy the liability. If the
appropriate official has not completed the application of the deposit
to the unsatisfied liability before the end of the 60-day period, the
deposit will be deemed to have been applied to the unsatisfied
liability as of the 60th day.
(5) Application for certificate of discharge. Any person desiring a
certificate of discharge under this paragraph (b) shall submit an
application in writing to the appropriate official. The application
shall contain the information required by the appropriate IRS
Publication. For purposes of this paragraph (b), any application for
certificate of discharge made by a property owner who is not the
taxpayer, and any amount submitted pursuant to the application, will be
treated as an application for discharge and a deposit under section
6325(b)(4) unless the owner of the property submits a statement, in
writing, that the application is being submitted under another
paragraph of section 6325 and not under section 6325(b)(4), and the
owner in writing waives the rights afforded under paragraph (b)(4),
including the right to seek judicial review.
(6) Valuation of interest of United States. For purposes of
paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(4) of this section, in determining the value
of the interest of the United States in the property, or any part
thereof, with respect to which the certificate of discharge is to be
issued, the appropriate official shall give consideration to the value
of the property and the amount of all liens and encumbrances thereon
having priority over the Federal tax lien. In determining the value of
the property, the appropriate official may, in his discretion, give
consideration to the forced sale value of the property in appropriate
cases.
* * * * *
(h) As used in this section, the term appropriate official means
either the official or office identified in the relevant IRS
Publication or, if such official or office is not so identified, the
Secretary or his delegate.
(i) Temporary regulations removed. The provisions of Sec.
401.6325-1 of this chapter are removed on the date these regulations
are published as final regulations in the Federal Register.
(j) Effective date. This section applies to any release of lien or
discharge of property that is requested after these regulations are
published as final regulations in the Federal Register.
Par. 3. Section 301.6503(f)-1 is amended as follows:
1. The section heading is revised.
2. The undesignated paragraph is designated as paragraph (a) and a
paragraph heading is added.
3. In newly designated paragraph (a), the language ``a district
director'' is removed and the language ``the appropriate official'' is
added in its place, the language ``the district director'' is removed
and the language ``the appropriate official'' is added in its place,
and in the Example the language ``district director'' is removed and
the language ``appropriate official'' is added in its place, wherever
it appears.
4. Paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) are added.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 301.6503(f)-1 Suspension of running of period of limitation;
wrongful seizure of property of third-party owner and discharge of
wrongful lien for substitution of value.
(a) Wrongful seizure. * * *
(b) Discharge of wrongful lien for substitution of value. If a
person other than the taxpayer submits a request in writing for a
certificate of discharge for a filed Federal tax lien under section
6325(b)(4), the running of the period of limitations on collection
after assessment under section 6502 for any liability listed in such
notice of Federal tax lien shall be suspended for a period equal to the
period beginning on the date the appropriate official receives a
deposit or bond in the amount specified in Sec. 301.6325-1(b)(4)(i)
and ending on the date that is 30 days after the earlier of--
[[Page 1308]]
(1) The date the appropriate official no longer holds, or is deemed
to no longer hold, within the meaning of paragraph (b)(4)(iv) of this
section, any amount as a deposit or bond by reason of taking such
actions as prescribed in sections 6325(b)(4)(B) and (C); or
(2) The date the judgment secured under section 7426(b)(5) becomes
final.
(c) As used in this section, the term appropriate official means
either the official or office identified in the relevant IRS
Publication or, if such official or office is not so identified, the
Secretary or his delegate.
(d) Effective date. This section applies to any request for a
certificate of discharge made after these regulations are published as
final regulations in the Federal Register.
Par. 4. In Sec. 301.7426-1, paragraphs (a)(4), (b)(5), and (d) are
added.
Sec. 301.7426-1 Civil actions by persons other than taxpayers.
(a) * * *
(4) Substitution of value. A person who obtains a certificate of
discharge under section 6325(b)(4) with respect to any property may,
within 120 days after the day on which the certificate is issued, bring
a civil action against the United States in a district court of the
United States for a determination of whether the value of the interest
of the United States (if any) in such property is less than the value
determined by the appropriate official. A civil action under this
provision shall be the exclusive judicial remedy for a person other
than the taxpayer who obtains a certificate of discharge for a filed
notice of Federal tax lien.
(b) * * *
(5) Substitution of value. If the court determines that the
determination by the appropriate official of the value of the interest
of the United States in the property exceeds the actual value of such
interest, the court may grant a judgment ordering a refund of the
amount deposited, or a release of the bond, to the extent that the
aggregate of those amounts exceeds the value as determined by the
court.
* * * * *
(d) Paragraphs (a)(4) and (b)(5) of this section apply to any
request for a certificate of discharge made after these regulations are
published as final regulations in the Federal Register.
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E7-219 Filed 1-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P