Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X Airplane, Windshield Coating in Lieu of Wipers, 1135-1137 [E7-200]
Download as PDF
1135
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 6
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS–2005–0116]
Mediterranean Fruit Fly; Remove
Portions of Los Angeles, San
Bernardino, and Santa Clara Counties,
CA, From the List of Quarantined
Areas
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Affirmation of interim rule as
final rule.
AGENCY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
SUMMARY: We are adopting as a final
rule, without change, an interim rule
that amended the Mediterranean fruit
fly regulations by removing portions of
Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Santa
Clara Counties, CA, from the list of
quarantined areas and by removing
restrictions on the interstate movement
of regulated articles from those areas.
The interim rule was necessary to
relieve restrictions that were no longer
needed to prevent the spread of the
Mediterranean fruit fly into noninfested
areas of the United States.
DATES: Effective Date: Effective on
January 10, 2007, we are adopting as a
final rule the interim rule published at
71 FR 53963–53964 on September 13,
2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Wayne D. Burnett, National Fruit Fly
Program Manager, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road, Unit 134, Riverdale, MD
20737–1236; (301) 734–4387.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In an interim rule 1 effective on
February 7, 2006, and published in the
1 To view the interim rule, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, click on the ‘‘Advanced
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
Federal Register on February 13, 2006
(71 FR 7393–7395, Docket No. APHIS–
2005–0116), we amended the
Mediterranean fruit fly regulations
contained in 7 CFR 301.78 through
301.78–10 (referred to below as the
regulations) by adding portions of Los
Angeles, San Bernardino, and Santa
Clara Counties, CA, to the list of
quarantined areas in § 301.78–3(c) and
restricting the interstate movement of
regulated articles from those areas. The
February 2006 interim rule was
necessary to prevent the spread of
Mediterranean fruit fly into noninfested
areas of the United States. Comments on
the interim rule were required to be
received on or before April 14, 2006. We
did not receive any comments.
In a second interim rule 2 effective
September 7, 2006, and published in the
Federal Register on September 13, 2006
(71 FR 53963–53964, Docket No.
APHIS–2005–0116), we amended the
regulations by removing those same
portions of Los Angeles, San
Bernardino, and Santa Clara Counties,
CA, from the list of quarantined areas
and removing restrictions on the
interstate movement of regulated
articles from those areas. We took that
action based on trapping surveys
conducted by inspectors of California
State and county agencies that showed
that the Mediterranean fruit fly had
been eradicated from the quarantined
portions of Los Angeles, San
Bernardino, and Santa Clara Counties,
CA. As a result of that action, there are
no longer any areas in the continental
United States quarantined for the
Mediterranean fruit fly.
Comments on the interim rule were
required to be received on or before
November 13, 2006. We did not receive
any comments. Therefore, for the
reasons given in the interim rule, we are
adopting the interim rule as a final rule.
This action also affirms the
information contained in the interim
rules concerning Executive Order 12866
and the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
Executive Orders 12372 and 12988, and
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Search’’ tab, and select ‘‘Docket Search.’’ In the
Docket ID field, enter APHIS–2005–0116, then click
‘‘Submit.’’ Clicking on the Docket ID link in the
search results page will produce a list of all
documents in the docket.
2 See footnote 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Further, for this action, the Office of
Management and Budget has waived its
review under Executive Order 12866.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
PART 301—DOMESTIC QUARANTINE
NOTICES
Accordingly, we are adopting as a
final rule, without change, the interim
rule that amended 7 CFR part 301 and
that was published at 71 FR 53963–
53964 on September 13, 2006.
I
Done in Washington, DC, this 3rd day of
January 2007.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E7–110 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM348; Special Conditions No.
25–343–SC]
Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation
Model Falcon 7X Airplane, Windshield
Coating in Lieu of Wipers
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This special condition is
issued for the Dassault Aviation Model
Falcon 7X airplane. This airplane will
have a novel or unusual design feature
associated with use of a hydrophobic
windshield coating, rather than
windshield wipers, as the means to
maintain a clear portion of the
windshield during precipitation
conditions, as required by the
airworthiness standards for transport
category airplanes. The applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for this design feature. This special
condition contains the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
1136
DATES:
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 10, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Effective Date: December 29,
2006.
John
McConnell, Airplane and Flight Crew
Interface Branch, ANM–111, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1365;
facsimile (425) 227–1320; e-mail
john.mcconnell@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 4, 2002, Dassault Aviation, 9
´
rond Point des Champs Elysees, 75008,
Paris, France, applied for a type
certificate for its new Model Falcon 7X
airplane. The Model Falcon 7X is a 19
passenger transport category airplane,
powered by three aft mounted Pratt &
Whitney PW307A high bypass ratio
turbofan engines. Operation of the
airplane is accomplished using a fly-bywire (FBW) primary flight control
system. This will be the first application
of a FBW primary flight control system
in a private/corporate use airplane.
The Dassault Aviation Model Falcon
7X flightdeck design incorporates a
hydrophobic windshield coating to
provide adequate pilot compartment
view in the presence of precipitation.
Primary reliance on such a coating,
without windshield wipers, constitutes
a novel or unusual design feature for
which the applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards. Therefore,
a special condition is required that
provides the level of safety equivalent to
that established by the regulations.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Dassault Aviation must show that the
Model Falcon 7X airplane meets the
applicable provisions of part 25, as
amended by Amendment 25–1 through
Amendment 25–108.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model Falcon 7X because of a
novel or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model Falcon 7X must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The
FAA must also issue a finding of
regulatory adequacy under § 611 of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
Public Law 92–574, the ‘‘Noise Control
Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, under § 11.38, and
they become part of the type
certification basis under § 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same or similar novel
or unusual design feature, the special
conditions would also apply to the other
model under § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model Falcon 7X will incorporate
the following novel or unusual design
feature: Hydrophobic windshield
coating to provide adequate pilot
compartment view in the presence of
precipitation. Sole reliance on such a
coating, without windshield wipers or a
windshield blower, constitutes a novel
or unusual design feature for which the
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards.
Discussion
Section 25.773(b)(1) requires that both
pilots of a transport category airplane be
provided a means to maintain a
sufficiently clear portion of the
windshield during precipitation
conditions, and that this clear portion of
the windshield must have a sufficiently
extensive view along the flight path.
The regulations require this means to
maintain such an area during
precipitation in heavy rain at speeds up
to 1.5 VSR1.
This requirement has existed in
principle since 1953 in Part 4b of the
Civil Air Regulations (CAR). Section
4b.351(b)(1) of CAR 4b required that
‘‘Means shall be provided for
maintaining a sufficient portion of the
windshield clear so that both pilots are
afforded a sufficiently extensive view
along the flight path in all normal flight
attitudes of the airplane. Such means
shall be designed to function under the
following conditions without
continuous attention on the part of the
crew: (i) In heavy rain at speeds up to
1.6 VS1, flaps retracted.’’ Effective
December 26, 2002, Amendment 25–108
changed the speed for effectiveness of
the means to maintain an area of clear
vision from up to 1.6 VS1 to 1.5 VSR1 to
accommodate the redefinition of the
reference stall speed from the minimum
speed in the stall, VS1, to greater than or
equal to the 1-g stall speed. As noted in
the preamble to the final rule for that
amendment, the reduced factor of 1.5 on
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VSR1 is to maintain approximately the
same speed as the 1.6 factor on VS1.
The requirement that the means to
maintain a clear area of forward vision
must function at high speeds and high
precipitation rates is based on the use of
windshield wipers as the means to
maintain an adequate area of clear
vision in precipitation conditions. The
requirement in 14 CFR 121.313(b), and
in 14 CFR 125.213(b), to provide ‘‘a
windshield wiper or equivalent for each
pilot station’’ has remained unchanged
since at least 1953.
The effectiveness of windshield
wipers to maintain an area of clear
vision normally degrades as airspeed
and precipitation rates increase. It is
assumed that because high speeds and
high precipitation rates represent
limiting conditions for windshield
wipers, they will also be effective at
lower speeds and precipitation levels.
Accordingly, § 25.773(b)(1)(i) does not
require maintenance of a clear area of
forward vision at lower speeds or lower
precipitation rates.
A forced airflow blown directly over
the windshield has also been used to
maintain an area of clear vision in
precipitation. The limiting conditions
for this technology are comparable to
those for windshield wipers.
Accordingly, introduction of this
technology did not present a need for
special conditions to maintain the level
of safety embodied in the existing
regulations.
Hydrophobic windshield coatings
may depend to some degree on airflow
directly over the windshield to maintain
a clear vision area. The heavy rain and
high-speed conditions specified in the
current rule do not necessarily represent
the limiting conditions for this new
technology. For example, airflow over
the windshield, which may be necessary
to remove moisture from the
windshield, may not be adequate to
maintain a sufficiently clear area of the
windshield in low speed flight or during
ground operations. Alternatively,
airflow over the windshield may be
disturbed during such critical times as
the approach to land, where the airplane
is at a higher than normal pitch attitude.
In these cases, areas of airflow
disturbance or separation on the
windshield could cause failure to
maintain a clear vision area on the
windshield.
In addition to potentially depending
on airflow to function effectively,
hydrophobic coatings may also be
dependent on water droplet size for
effective precipitation removal. For
example, precipitation in the form of a
light mist may not be sufficient for the
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 6 / Wednesday, January 10, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
coating’s properties to result in
maintaining a clear area of vision.
In summary, the current regulations
identify speed and precipitation rate
requirements that represent limiting
conditions for windshield wipers and
blowers, but not for hydrophobic
coatings, so it is necessary to issue
special conditions to maintain the level
of safety represented by the current
regulations.
These special conditions provide an
appropriate safety standard for the
hydrophobic coating technology as the
means to maintain a clear area of vision
by requiring it to be effective at low
speeds and precipitation rates as well as
the higher speeds and precipitation
rates identified in the current
regulation. These are the only new or
changed requirements relative to those
in § 25.773(b)(1) at Amendment 25–108.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special condition
No. 25–06–07 for the Dassault Aviation
Model Falcon 7X airplane was
published in the Federal Register on
July 12, 2006 (71 FR 39235). No
comments were received and this
special condition is adopted as
proposed.
The Special Condition
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
condition is issued as part of the type
certification basis for Dassault Aviation
Model Falcon 7X airplanes.
Pilot Compartment View—Hydrophobic
Coatings in Lieu of Windshield Wipers
The airplane must have a means to
maintain a clear portion of the
windshield, during precipitation
conditions, enough for both pilots to
have a sufficiently extensive view along
the ground or flight path in normal taxi
and flight attitudes of the airplane. This
means must be designed to function,
without continuous attention on the
part of the crew, in conditions from
light misting precipitation to heavy rain
at speeds from fully stopped in still air,
to 1.5 VSR1 with lift and drag devices
retracted.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 29, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–200 Filed 1–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Applicability
As discussed above, this special
condition is applicable to the Model
Falcon 7X. Should Dassault Aviation
apply at a later date for a change to the
type certificate to include another
model on the same type certificate
incorporating the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special condition
would apply to that model as well.
Effective Upon Issuance
Under standard practice, the effective
date of final special conditions would
be 30 days after the date of publication
in the Federal Register; however, as the
certification date for the Dassault Model
Falcon 7X is imminent, the FAA finds
that good cause exists to make this
special condition effective upon
issuance.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one model
of airplane. It is not a rule of general
applicability.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
The authority citation for this special
condition is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701,
44702, 44704.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:45 Jan 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM363; Special Conditions No.
25–344–SC]
Special Conditions: Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation Model G–
1159A Airplanes; High-Intensity
Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA issues these special
conditions for a Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation Model G–1159A airplane
modified by AeroMech Incorporated.
This modified airplane will have a
novel or unusual design feature when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category
airplanes. The modification
incorporates the installation of
Innovative Solutions and Support
integrated air data display units
(ADDU). These systems perform critical
functions. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1137
protection of these systems from the
effects of high-intensity radiated fields
(HIRF). These special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: The effective date of these
special conditions is December 29,
2006. We must receive your comments
on or before February 9, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may mail or deliver
comments on these special conditions
in duplicate to: Federal Aviation
Administration, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Attention: Rules Docket
(ANM–113), Docket No. NM363, 1601
Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356. You must mark your
comments Docket No. NM363.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
Dunn, FAA, Airplane and Flight Crew
Interface Branch, ANM–111, Transport
Airplane Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2799;
facsimile (425) 227–1320.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA has determined that notice
and opportunity for prior public
comment for these special conditions is
impracticable because these procedures
would significantly delay certification
and delivery of the affected aircraft. In
addition, the substance of these special
conditions has been subject to the
public comment process in several prior
instances with no substantive comments
received. We therefore find that good
cause exists for making these special
conditions effective upon issuance.
However, we invite interested persons
to take part in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the special conditions,
explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
about these special conditions. You may
inspect the docket before and after the
comment closing date. If you wish to
review the docket in person, go to the
address in the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble between 7:30 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
We will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 10, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1135-1137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-200]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 25
[Docket No. NM348; Special Conditions No. 25-343-SC]
Special Conditions: Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X Airplane,
Windshield Coating in Lieu of Wipers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This special condition is issued for the Dassault Aviation
Model Falcon 7X airplane. This airplane will have a novel or unusual
design feature associated with use of a hydrophobic windshield coating,
rather than windshield wipers, as the means to maintain a clear portion
of the windshield during precipitation conditions, as required by the
airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this design feature. This special
condition contains the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
[[Page 1136]]
DATES: Effective Date: December 29, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John McConnell, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 227-1365; facsimile (425) 227-
1320; e-mail john.mcconnell@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 4, 2002, Dassault Aviation, 9 rond Point des Champs
Elys[eacute]es, 75008, Paris, France, applied for a type certificate
for its new Model Falcon 7X airplane. The Model Falcon 7X is a 19
passenger transport category airplane, powered by three aft mounted
Pratt & Whitney PW307A high bypass ratio turbofan engines. Operation of
the airplane is accomplished using a fly-by-wire (FBW) primary flight
control system. This will be the first application of a FBW primary
flight control system in a private/corporate use airplane.
The Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X flightdeck design
incorporates a hydrophobic windshield coating to provide adequate pilot
compartment view in the presence of precipitation. Primary reliance on
such a coating, without windshield wipers, constitutes a novel or
unusual design feature for which the applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards.
Therefore, a special condition is required that provides the level of
safety equivalent to that established by the regulations.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17, Dassault Aviation must show
that the Model Falcon 7X airplane meets the applicable provisions of
part 25, as amended by Amendment 25-1 through Amendment 25-108.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Model Falcon 7X because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of Sec. 21.16.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model Falcon 7X must comply with the fuel vent and
exhaust emission requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise
certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. The FAA must also issue a
finding of regulatory adequacy under Sec. 611 of Public Law 92-574,
the ``Noise Control Act of 1972.''
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, under
Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type certification basis under
Sec. 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same or similar
novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would also
apply to the other model under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Model Falcon 7X will incorporate the following novel or unusual
design feature: Hydrophobic windshield coating to provide adequate
pilot compartment view in the presence of precipitation. Sole reliance
on such a coating, without windshield wipers or a windshield blower,
constitutes a novel or unusual design feature for which the applicable
airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety
standards.
Discussion
Section 25.773(b)(1) requires that both pilots of a transport
category airplane be provided a means to maintain a sufficiently clear
portion of the windshield during precipitation conditions, and that
this clear portion of the windshield must have a sufficiently extensive
view along the flight path. The regulations require this means to
maintain such an area during precipitation in heavy rain at speeds up
to 1.5 VSR1.
This requirement has existed in principle since 1953 in Part 4b of
the Civil Air Regulations (CAR). Section 4b.351(b)(1) of CAR 4b
required that ``Means shall be provided for maintaining a sufficient
portion of the windshield clear so that both pilots are afforded a
sufficiently extensive view along the flight path in all normal flight
attitudes of the airplane. Such means shall be designed to function
under the following conditions without continuous attention on the part
of the crew: (i) In heavy rain at speeds up to 1.6 VS1,
flaps retracted.'' Effective December 26, 2002, Amendment 25-108
changed the speed for effectiveness of the means to maintain an area of
clear vision from up to 1.6 VS1 to 1.5 VSR1 to
accommodate the redefinition of the reference stall speed from the
minimum speed in the stall, VS1, to greater than or equal to
the 1-g stall speed. As noted in the preamble to the final rule for
that amendment, the reduced factor of 1.5 on VSR1 is to
maintain approximately the same speed as the 1.6 factor on
VS1.
The requirement that the means to maintain a clear area of forward
vision must function at high speeds and high precipitation rates is
based on the use of windshield wipers as the means to maintain an
adequate area of clear vision in precipitation conditions. The
requirement in 14 CFR 121.313(b), and in 14 CFR 125.213(b), to provide
``a windshield wiper or equivalent for each pilot station'' has
remained unchanged since at least 1953.
The effectiveness of windshield wipers to maintain an area of clear
vision normally degrades as airspeed and precipitation rates increase.
It is assumed that because high speeds and high precipitation rates
represent limiting conditions for windshield wipers, they will also be
effective at lower speeds and precipitation levels. Accordingly, Sec.
25.773(b)(1)(i) does not require maintenance of a clear area of forward
vision at lower speeds or lower precipitation rates.
A forced airflow blown directly over the windshield has also been
used to maintain an area of clear vision in precipitation. The limiting
conditions for this technology are comparable to those for windshield
wipers. Accordingly, introduction of this technology did not present a
need for special conditions to maintain the level of safety embodied in
the existing regulations.
Hydrophobic windshield coatings may depend to some degree on
airflow directly over the windshield to maintain a clear vision area.
The heavy rain and high-speed conditions specified in the current rule
do not necessarily represent the limiting conditions for this new
technology. For example, airflow over the windshield, which may be
necessary to remove moisture from the windshield, may not be adequate
to maintain a sufficiently clear area of the windshield in low speed
flight or during ground operations. Alternatively, airflow over the
windshield may be disturbed during such critical times as the approach
to land, where the airplane is at a higher than normal pitch attitude.
In these cases, areas of airflow disturbance or separation on the
windshield could cause failure to maintain a clear vision area on the
windshield.
In addition to potentially depending on airflow to function
effectively, hydrophobic coatings may also be dependent on water
droplet size for effective precipitation removal. For example,
precipitation in the form of a light mist may not be sufficient for the
[[Page 1137]]
coating's properties to result in maintaining a clear area of vision.
In summary, the current regulations identify speed and
precipitation rate requirements that represent limiting conditions for
windshield wipers and blowers, but not for hydrophobic coatings, so it
is necessary to issue special conditions to maintain the level of
safety represented by the current regulations.
These special conditions provide an appropriate safety standard for
the hydrophobic coating technology as the means to maintain a clear
area of vision by requiring it to be effective at low speeds and
precipitation rates as well as the higher speeds and precipitation
rates identified in the current regulation. These are the only new or
changed requirements relative to those in Sec. 25.773(b)(1) at
Amendment 25-108.
Discussion of Comments
Notice of proposed special condition No. 25-06-07 for the Dassault
Aviation Model Falcon 7X airplane was published in the Federal Register
on July 12, 2006 (71 FR 39235). No comments were received and this
special condition is adopted as proposed.
Applicability
As discussed above, this special condition is applicable to the
Model Falcon 7X. Should Dassault Aviation apply at a later date for a
change to the type certificate to include another model on the same
type certificate incorporating the same novel or unusual design
feature, the special condition would apply to that model as well.
Effective Upon Issuance
Under standard practice, the effective date of final special
conditions would be 30 days after the date of publication in the
Federal Register; however, as the certification date for the Dassault
Model Falcon 7X is imminent, the FAA finds that good cause exists to
make this special condition effective upon issuance.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on one model of airplane. It is not a rule of general applicability.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The authority citation for this special condition is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.
The Special Condition
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special condition is issued as part of the
type certification basis for Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 7X
airplanes.
Pilot Compartment View--Hydrophobic Coatings in Lieu of Windshield
Wipers
The airplane must have a means to maintain a clear portion of the
windshield, during precipitation conditions, enough for both pilots to
have a sufficiently extensive view along the ground or flight path in
normal taxi and flight attitudes of the airplane. This means must be
designed to function, without continuous attention on the part of the
crew, in conditions from light misting precipitation to heavy rain at
speeds from fully stopped in still air, to 1.5 VSR1 with
lift and drag devices retracted.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 29, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-200 Filed 1-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P