Statement of Policy: “Purpose of Disbursement” Entries for Filings With the Commission, 887-889 [E7-65]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Applicants must certify and
provide adequate proof that the
expenses incurred to eligible fruit trees,
bushes, or vines occurred during the
applicable disaster period and that the
loss or damage was a direct result of a
2005 hurricane, as set forth in §
760.101.
(c) The quantity and kind of fruit
trees, bushes, or vines that died or were
damaged as a result of the applicable
disaster may be documented by;
purchase records; bank or other loan
documents; Federal Emergency
Management Agency and National
Guard records; IRS records; property tax
records; private insurance documents;
and similar documents.
§ 760.504
Payment calculation.
(a) TIP payments shall be calculated
by multiplying the following national
payment rate for the applicable tier by
the number of eligible acres, excluding
but not limited to such things as
drainage ditches and canals, in a stand
of fruit trees, bushes, or vines by the
producer’s share in such crop:
(1) Tier I—$750;
(2) Tier II—$300;
(3) Tier III—$200; and
(4) Tier IV—$90.
(b) If the actual expenses incurred for
damage are greater than the value
associated with the tier based on the
location of the stand, the applicant may
submit documentation to FSA to request
the stand be placed in the next lowernumbered tier which represents a
greater level of loss and a higher
payment rate. Regardless of the
expenses incurred the stand can only be
placed in the next lower-numbered tier.
adversely affected by drought in
counties reaching D3 or D4 Drought on
the U.S. Drought Monitor, during March
7 to August 31, 2006, in the States of:
Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado,
Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri,
Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North
Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas,
Wisconsin and Wyoming. Under the
Livestock Assistance Grant Program,
FSA will provide grants to the State
governments of these States to assist
livestock producers who suffered forage
losses as part of a farming operation in
eligible counties. The amount of each
grant will be based on the number of
adult beef cattle and sheep from each
eligible county uniformly prorated to
insure that available funding is not
exceeded. Producers in eligible counties
in those States who suffered forage
losses as part of a farming operation are
eligible for assistance under these
grants. Among other conditions of these
grants, assistance provided by a State
under such a grant to an applicant shall
not exceed $10,000, except for general
partnerships and joint ventures in
which case assistance shall not exceed
$10,000 times the number of members
that constitute the general partnership
or joint venture.
Signed in Washington, DC January 4, 2007.
Teresa C. Lasseter,
Administrator, Farm Service Agency.
[FR Doc. E7–88 Filed 1–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–05–P
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Subpart G—Aquaculture Program
11 CFR Part 104
§ 760.601
[Notice 2006—23]
Funds availability.
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with RULES
FSA will provide block grants to the
states of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana,
Mississippi, North Carolina and Texas
where aquaculture was adversely
affected by 2005 hurricanes as set forth
in § 760.101. Producers in eligible
counties in those states who raise
aquaculture species in a controlled
environment as part of a farming
operation and who have not received
assistance under other disaster programs
for the same aquaculture losses are
eligible to receive these funds. Funds
provided by a State to a farming
operation under such a grant shall not
exceed $80,000.
Subpart H—2006 Livestock Assistance
Grant Program
§ 760.701
Funds availability.
FSA will administer a limited
program to provide assistance to
livestock producers where forage was
VerDate Aug 31 2005
03:41 Jan 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
Statement of Policy: ‘‘Purpose of
Disbursement’’ Entries for Filings With
the Commission
Federal Election Commission.
Statement of Policy.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Political committees and
other persons required to file campaign
finance reports with the FEC must
itemize certain disbursements and, for
each itemized disbursement, must
provide information including a brief
description of the purpose of the
disbursement. The ‘‘purpose of
disbursement’’ entry, when considered
along with the identity of the
disbursement recipient, must be
sufficiently specific to make the purpose
of the disbursement clear. The guidance
below includes a non-exhaustive list of
‘‘purpose of disbursement’’ entries that
are generally acceptable, and a non-
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
887
exhaustive list of terms that are
generally not acceptable.
DATES: Effective as of January 9, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard T. Ewell, Attorney, 999 E Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694–
1650 or (800) 424–9530, or Debbie
Chacona, Branch Chief, Party/Non-Party
Branch, Reports Analysis Division, 999
E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463,
(202) 694–1130 or (800) 424–9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Political
committees and other persons required
to file campaign finance reports with the
FEC must itemize certain disbursements
and, for each itemized disbursement,
must provide the full name and address
of the recipient, the date the
disbursement was made, and a brief
statement or description of why the
disbursement was made. See 2 U.S.C.
434(b); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(3) and (4),
104.10(b)(4), 104.17(b)(3) and
300.36(b)(2)(iii). The ‘‘purpose of
disbursement’’ entry, when considered
along with the identity of the
disbursement recipient, must be
sufficiently specific to make the purpose
of the disbursement clear. 11 CFR
104.3(b)(3)(i)(B) and (4)(i)(A). The
Commission’s regulation requiring a
description of the purpose of each
itemized disbursement includes
examples of descriptions that are
acceptable (e.g., ‘‘dinner expenses,’’
‘‘salary,’’ ‘‘travel expenses’’) and
examples that are unacceptable (e.g.,
‘‘advance,’’ ‘‘miscellaneous’’). Neither
list is exhaustive.
The Commission solicited comments
on a draft of this policy statement on
November 2, 2006. Two comments were
received. After reviewing the comments
received, the Commission has decided
to publish the policy statement with one
change. As suggested by a commenter,
the Commission has added ‘‘ConsultingPolitical’’ to the examples of generally
insufficient descriptions. In light of this
change, the Commission has also added
examples of descriptions that would be
generally sufficient, such as
‘‘Consulting-Media,’’ ‘‘ConsultingFundraising,’’ ‘‘Consulting-Polling,’’
‘‘Consulting-Legal’’ and ‘‘ConsultingGet-Out-The-Vote.’’
The Commission recognizes that the
‘‘purpose of disbursement’’ entries,
when linked to information provided
about the recipient of the payment, may
provide sufficient disclosure. For
example, a disbursement to an office
supply vendor for the stated purpose of
‘‘Supplies’’ provides adequate and
acceptable disclosure, while a
disbursement to a committee staff
member for the same purpose of
‘‘Supplies’’ would likely trigger a
E:\FR\FM\MIKE.XXX
MIKE
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with RULES
888
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
request for a more complete description
of the purpose of the disbursement. In
the former case, it is obvious to the
reader what type of supplies were
purchased, while in the latter case, it is
not.
As a rule of thumb, filers should
consider the following question: ‘‘Could
a person not associated with the
committee easily discern why the
disbursement was made when reading
the name of the recipient and the
purpose?’’ For example, a person not
associated with the committee could not
easily discern the purpose of a
disbursement made to a vendor for
‘‘Consulting’’ (unless the vendor’s name
makes the purpose clear, e.g., Smith
Fundraising Consulting, Inc.). As
discussed above, however, if the
committee were to provide additional
detail with respect to the type of
consulting the vendor provided (e.g.,
‘‘Fundraising Consulting’’), an
unassociated person would have no
difficultly discerning the purpose of the
disbursement.
All information on campaign finance
reports submitted to the FEC, including
the entries for ‘‘purpose of
disbursement,’’ are reviewed by analysts
in the Reports Analysis Division (RAD).
Some campaign finance reports,
particularly those filed by presidential
campaign committees accepting public
funding, are also reviewed by auditors
in the Audit Division. In practice, the
RAD analysts and the auditors often
encounter ‘‘purpose of disbursement’’
entries that are not listed in the
examples contained in 11 CFR
104.3(b)(3) and (4), and receive
questions from filers regarding
acceptable descriptions. Therefore, in
order to provide further guidance to
filers and to encourage consistency
between filers, the Commission is
publishing lists of additional generally
acceptable and generally unacceptable
descriptions.
The Commission does not intend to
request that a committee provide
additional information about a purpose
of disbursement entry if the committee
uses those descriptions listed below as
providing sufficient detail. However, if
a committee uses a description that is
listed as lacking sufficient detail, a RAD
analyst may review the report more
closely but the Commission would not
automatically take any particular action.
In most instances, the Commission will
merely contact the reporting committee
and the committee may then amend its
report. In the rare circumstances in
which the Commission deems it
necessary to pursue the matter further,
the Commission will conduct a separate
review of the sufficiency of the
VerDate Aug 31 2005
03:41 Jan 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
description of purpose to determine
whether it meets the requirements of 11
CFR 104.3(b).
Any future revisions to these lists will
be posted on the Commission’s Web site
at https://www.fec.gov/law/policy.shtml.
Committees with questions can contact
either their assigned RAD analyst
(phone: (800) 424–9530 (press 5)) or the
FEC Information Division (phone: (800)
424–9530 (press 6); e-mail:
info@fec.gov).
Descriptions of purpose that provide
sufficient detail:
• ‘‘Salary’’ for a disbursement to a
staff member.
• ‘‘Media’’ for a disbursement to a
television or radio communication
company.
• ‘‘Polling’’ for a disbursement to a
research/communications company.
• ‘‘Travel,’’ ‘‘Travel Expenses,’’ or
‘‘Travel Expense Reimbursement’’ for a
disbursement to a staff member.
• ‘‘Printing’’ for a disbursement to a
printing company.
• ‘‘Phone Banks’’ for a disbursement
to a vendor providing phone bank
services.
• ‘‘Dinner Expense’’ for a
disbursement to a restaurant.
• ‘‘Catering Cost’’ for a disbursement
to a hotel or restaurant where a
fundraiser was held.
• ‘‘Party Fees’’ or ‘‘Party Annual
Dues’’ for a disbursement to a National
Party Committee for their annual dues.
• ‘‘Exit Polling,’’ ‘‘Door-to-Door GetOut-the-Vote,’’ ‘‘Get-Out-the-Vote Phone
Calls,’’ or ‘‘Driving Voters to the Polls’’
to individuals or vendors contracted for
get-out-the-vote or voter registration
activity.
• ‘‘Supplies’’ for a disbursement to an
office supply vendor.
• ‘‘Consultant-Media,’’ ‘‘ConsultantFundraising,’’ ‘‘Consultant-Get-Out-TheVote,’’ ‘‘Consultant-Legal,’’ or
‘‘Consultant-Polling’’ for a disbursement
to a consultant or consulting company.
Descriptions of purposes that
generally lack sufficient detail:
Administrative Expenses
Admin.
Advance
Bonus
Bounty
Campaign Expense
Campaign Material
Charges
Collateral
Collateral Materials
Commission
Compensation (other than committee
staff)
Consultant
Consultant-Political
Consulting
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Consulting Non-FEA
Consulting Service
Contract
Contract Labor
Contractual Services
Convention Expenses
Convention Services
Costs
Delegate
Delegate Expenses
Design
Discount Fees
Election Day Expense
Entertainment
Event
Event Expense
Event Reimbursement
Event Supplies (if to an individual)
Expenses
Expense Reimbursement
Fees
Fundraising (if to an individual)
Fundraising Event
Fundraising Expense (if to an
individual)
Fundraising Fees (if to an individual)
Fundraising Supplies (if to an
individual)
General Advice
General Consulting
Generic Campaign Activity
Generic Consulting
Get-Out-The-Vote or GOTV
GOTV Expenses
GOTV Labor
Invoice
Labor
Literature
Meeting (if to an individual)
Meeting Expenses (if to an individual)
Meeting Supplies (if to an individual)
Miscellaneous or Misc.
Miscellaneous Expense
Office Expense (if to an individual)
Office Services
Outside Services
Operating Expenses
Other Expenses
Production
Professional Fees
Professional Fees—Consulting
Professional Services
Promotional Material
Publication
Push Card
Reimbursement
Rendered Service
Services
Services Rendered
State Convention
Supplies (if to an individual)
Voter Bounty
Voter Contact
Voter Drive
Voter Identification or Voter ID
Voter Registration
Worker
This Federal Register notice
represents a general statement of policy
E:\FR\FM\MIKE.XXX
MIKE
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 5 / Tuesday, January 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
announcing the general course of action
that the Commission intends to follow.
This policy statement does not
constitute an agency regulation
requiring notice of proposed
rulemaking, opportunities for public
participation, prior publication, and
delay in effective date under 5 U.S.C.
553 of the Administrative Procedure Act
(‘‘APA’’). As such, it does not bind the
Commission or any member of the
general public. The provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, which apply
when notice and comment are required
by the APA or another statute, are not
applicable.
Dated: December 27, 2006.
Robert D. Lenhard,
Vice Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. E7–65 Filed 1–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2005–22696; Directorate
Identifier 2005–SW–22–AD; Amendment 39–
14877; AD 2007–01–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bell
Helicopter Textron Canada Model
206A, B, L, L–1, L–3, and L–4
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes
an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for the specified Bell Helicopter Textron
Canada (BHTC) model helicopters. The
existing AD currently requires certain
inspections and checks of the tail rotor
blade (blade) for a deformation, a crack,
and a bent or deformed tail rotor weight
(weight). Also, that AD requires, before
further flight, replacing each blade with
an airworthy blade if a deformation, a
crack, or a bent or deformed weight is
found. This action contains the same
actions as the existing AD and also adds
to the applicability certain serialnumbered blades inadvertently omitted
from the current AD. This action also
requires replacing each affected blade,
which is a terminating action. This
amendment is prompted by three
reports of skin cracks originating near
the blade trailing edge balance weight.
The actions specified by this AD are
intended to prevent blade failure and
subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
VerDate Aug 31 2005
03:41 Jan 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
Effective February 13, 2007.
You may get the service
information identified in this AD from
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada, 12,800
Rue de l’Avenir, Mirabel, Quebec
J7J1R4, telephone (450) 437–2862 or
(800) 363–8023, fax (450) 433–0272.
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
Examining the Docket
You may examine the docket that
contains this AD, any comments, and
other information on the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or at the Docket
Management System (DMS), U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Room PL–401, on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sharon Miles, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations
and Guidance Group, Fort Worth, Texas
76193–0111, telephone (817) 222–5122,
fax (817) 222–5961.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposal to amend 14 CFR part 39 by
superseding AD 2004–24–08,
Amendment 39–13884 (69 FR 69810,
December 1, 2004), for the specified
BHTC model helicopters was published
in the Federal Register on October 17,
2005 (70 FR 60246). This action
contains the same actions as the existing
AD. Also, when we issued AD 2004–24–
08, we intentionally did not include the
long-term requirement (no later than
April 27, 2007) for removing and
sending the affected blades to Rotor
Blades, Inc. as specified by the
manufacturer. We are including a longterm requirement in this AD that the
affected blades be replaced on or before
April 27, 2007, as terminating action.
Additionally, in AD 2004–24–08, we
inadvertently omitted blade serial
numbers 10102 through 10114 from the
applicability. We are correcting that
oversight with this action.
Since issuing AD 2004–24–08, BHTC
has issued Alert Service Bulletin 206–
04–100 for Bell Model 206A and B
helicopters, and 206L–04–127 for Bell
Model 206L series helicopters, both
Revision C, both dated March 5, 2005
(ASB). These ASBs add two warnings in
the compliance section specifying
returning the blade for balancing to
Rotor Blades, Inc., and introduce new
skin damage limits that supersede the
previous damage limits. The ASB also
gives a new address for Rotor Blades
Inc.
Transport Canada, the airworthiness
authority for Canada, notified the FAA
that an unsafe condition may exist on
these helicopter models. Transport
Canada advises of three reports of skin
cracks originating near the blade trailing
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
889
edge balance weight. Two of the
occurrences caused a loss of the weight
and a strip of material along the trailing
edge leading to an imbalance, which
caused the fracture of three of the four
tail rotor gearbox attachments. One of
these occurrences resulted in the
gearbox shifting that caused failure of
the drive shaft and resulting loss of yaw
control. Transport Canada issued AD
No. CF–2004–05R1, dated June 28,
2004, to ensure the continued
airworthiness of these helicopters in
Canada.
These helicopter models are
manufactured in Canada and are type
certificated for operation in the United
States under the provisions of 14 CFR
21.29 and the applicable bilateral
agreement. Pursuant to the applicable
bilateral agreement, Transport Canada
has kept the FAA informed of the
situation described above. The FAA has
examined the findings of Transport
Canada, reviewed all available
information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for products of these
type designs that are certificated for
operation in the United States.
Interested persons have been afforded
an opportunity to participate in the
making of this amendment. No
comments were received on the
proposal or the FAA’s determination of
the cost to the public. The FAA has
determined that air safety and the
public interest require the adoption of
the rule as proposed, except for a
change in paragraph (f) of the AD to add
additional contact information. This
change will neither increase the
economic burden on any operator nor
increase the scope of the AD.
The FAA estimates that this AD will:
• Affect 2194 helicopters of U.S.
registry,
• Take about 1⁄4 work hour for a blade
check or inspection, and
• Take 3 work hours to replace a
blade at an average labor rate of $65 per
work hour.
• Cost about $5848 per helicopter. (In
its ASB, the manufacturer states it will
give warranty credit based on hour
usage on the blade with remaining life
hours and other restrictions.)
Based on these figures, we estimate
the total cost impact of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $19,989,973. Costs
assume—200 pilot checks, 26 mechanic
inspections, and one blade replacement
for 90 percent of the fleet with a
nonconforming blade.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
E:\FR\FM\MIKE.XXX
MIKE
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 9, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 887-889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-65]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
11 CFR Part 104
[Notice 2006--23]
Statement of Policy: ``Purpose of Disbursement'' Entries for
Filings With the Commission
AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.
ACTION: Statement of Policy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Political committees and other persons required to file
campaign finance reports with the FEC must itemize certain
disbursements and, for each itemized disbursement, must provide
information including a brief description of the purpose of the
disbursement. The ``purpose of disbursement'' entry, when considered
along with the identity of the disbursement recipient, must be
sufficiently specific to make the purpose of the disbursement clear.
The guidance below includes a non-exhaustive list of ``purpose of
disbursement'' entries that are generally acceptable, and a non-
exhaustive list of terms that are generally not acceptable.
DATES: Effective as of January 9, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard T. Ewell, Attorney, 999 E
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1650 or (800) 424-9530, or
Debbie Chacona, Branch Chief, Party/Non-Party Branch, Reports Analysis
Division, 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC 20463, (202) 694-1130 or
(800) 424-9530.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Political committees and other persons
required to file campaign finance reports with the FEC must itemize
certain disbursements and, for each itemized disbursement, must provide
the full name and address of the recipient, the date the disbursement
was made, and a brief statement or description of why the disbursement
was made. See 2 U.S.C. 434(b); 11 CFR 104.3(b)(3) and (4),
104.10(b)(4), 104.17(b)(3) and 300.36(b)(2)(iii). The ``purpose of
disbursement'' entry, when considered along with the identity of the
disbursement recipient, must be sufficiently specific to make the
purpose of the disbursement clear. 11 CFR 104.3(b)(3)(i)(B) and
(4)(i)(A). The Commission's regulation requiring a description of the
purpose of each itemized disbursement includes examples of descriptions
that are acceptable (e.g., ``dinner expenses,'' ``salary,'' ``travel
expenses'') and examples that are unacceptable (e.g., ``advance,''
``miscellaneous''). Neither list is exhaustive.
The Commission solicited comments on a draft of this policy
statement on November 2, 2006. Two comments were received. After
reviewing the comments received, the Commission has decided to publish
the policy statement with one change. As suggested by a commenter, the
Commission has added ``Consulting-Political'' to the examples of
generally insufficient descriptions. In light of this change, the
Commission has also added examples of descriptions that would be
generally sufficient, such as ``Consulting-Media,'' ``Consulting-
Fundraising,'' ``Consulting-Polling,'' ``Consulting-Legal'' and
``Consulting-Get-Out-The-Vote.''
The Commission recognizes that the ``purpose of disbursement''
entries, when linked to information provided about the recipient of the
payment, may provide sufficient disclosure. For example, a disbursement
to an office supply vendor for the stated purpose of ``Supplies''
provides adequate and acceptable disclosure, while a disbursement to a
committee staff member for the same purpose of ``Supplies'' would
likely trigger a
[[Page 888]]
request for a more complete description of the purpose of the
disbursement. In the former case, it is obvious to the reader what type
of supplies were purchased, while in the latter case, it is not.
As a rule of thumb, filers should consider the following question:
``Could a person not associated with the committee easily discern why
the disbursement was made when reading the name of the recipient and
the purpose?'' For example, a person not associated with the committee
could not easily discern the purpose of a disbursement made to a vendor
for ``Consulting'' (unless the vendor's name makes the purpose clear,
e.g., Smith Fundraising Consulting, Inc.). As discussed above, however,
if the committee were to provide additional detail with respect to the
type of consulting the vendor provided (e.g., ``Fundraising
Consulting''), an unassociated person would have no difficultly
discerning the purpose of the disbursement.
All information on campaign finance reports submitted to the FEC,
including the entries for ``purpose of disbursement,'' are reviewed by
analysts in the Reports Analysis Division (RAD). Some campaign finance
reports, particularly those filed by presidential campaign committees
accepting public funding, are also reviewed by auditors in the Audit
Division. In practice, the RAD analysts and the auditors often
encounter ``purpose of disbursement'' entries that are not listed in
the examples contained in 11 CFR 104.3(b)(3) and (4), and receive
questions from filers regarding acceptable descriptions. Therefore, in
order to provide further guidance to filers and to encourage
consistency between filers, the Commission is publishing lists of
additional generally acceptable and generally unacceptable
descriptions.
The Commission does not intend to request that a committee provide
additional information about a purpose of disbursement entry if the
committee uses those descriptions listed below as providing sufficient
detail. However, if a committee uses a description that is listed as
lacking sufficient detail, a RAD analyst may review the report more
closely but the Commission would not automatically take any particular
action. In most instances, the Commission will merely contact the
reporting committee and the committee may then amend its report. In the
rare circumstances in which the Commission deems it necessary to pursue
the matter further, the Commission will conduct a separate review of
the sufficiency of the description of purpose to determine whether it
meets the requirements of 11 CFR 104.3(b).
Any future revisions to these lists will be posted on the
Commission's Web site at https://www.fec.gov/law/policy.shtml.
Committees with questions can contact either their assigned RAD analyst
(phone: (800) 424-9530 (press 5)) or the FEC Information Division
(phone: (800) 424-9530 (press 6); e-mail: info@fec.gov).
Descriptions of purpose that provide sufficient detail:
``Salary'' for a disbursement to a staff member.
``Media'' for a disbursement to a television or radio
communication company.
``Polling'' for a disbursement to a research/
communications company.
``Travel,'' ``Travel Expenses,'' or ``Travel Expense
Reimbursement'' for a disbursement to a staff member.
``Printing'' for a disbursement to a printing company.
``Phone Banks'' for a disbursement to a vendor providing
phone bank services.
``Dinner Expense'' for a disbursement to a restaurant.
``Catering Cost'' for a disbursement to a hotel or
restaurant where a fundraiser was held.
``Party Fees'' or ``Party Annual Dues'' for a disbursement
to a National Party Committee for their annual dues.
``Exit Polling,'' ``Door-to-Door Get-Out-the-Vote,''
``Get-Out-the-Vote Phone Calls,'' or ``Driving Voters to the Polls'' to
individuals or vendors contracted for get-out-the-vote or voter
registration activity.
``Supplies'' for a disbursement to an office supply
vendor.
``Consultant-Media,'' ``Consultant-Fundraising,''
``Consultant-Get-Out-The-Vote,'' ``Consultant-Legal,'' or ``Consultant-
Polling'' for a disbursement to a consultant or consulting company.
Descriptions of purposes that generally lack sufficient detail:
Administrative Expenses
Admin.
Advance
Bonus
Bounty
Campaign Expense
Campaign Material
Charges
Collateral
Collateral Materials
Commission
Compensation (other than committee staff)
Consultant
Consultant-Political
Consulting
Consulting Non-FEA
Consulting Service
Contract
Contract Labor
Contractual Services
Convention Expenses
Convention Services
Costs
Delegate
Delegate Expenses
Design
Discount Fees
Election Day Expense
Entertainment
Event
Event Expense
Event Reimbursement
Event Supplies (if to an individual)
Expenses
Expense Reimbursement
Fees
Fundraising (if to an individual)
Fundraising Event
Fundraising Expense (if to an individual)
Fundraising Fees (if to an individual)
Fundraising Supplies (if to an individual)
General Advice
General Consulting
Generic Campaign Activity
Generic Consulting
Get-Out-The-Vote or GOTV
GOTV Expenses
GOTV Labor
Invoice
Labor
Literature
Meeting (if to an individual)
Meeting Expenses (if to an individual)
Meeting Supplies (if to an individual)
Miscellaneous or Misc.
Miscellaneous Expense
Office Expense (if to an individual)
Office Services
Outside Services
Operating Expenses
Other Expenses
Production
Professional Fees
Professional Fees--Consulting
Professional Services
Promotional Material
Publication
Push Card
Reimbursement
Rendered Service
Services
Services Rendered
State Convention
Supplies (if to an individual)
Voter Bounty
Voter Contact
Voter Drive
Voter Identification or Voter ID
Voter Registration
Worker
This Federal Register notice represents a general statement of
policy
[[Page 889]]
announcing the general course of action that the Commission intends to
follow. This policy statement does not constitute an agency regulation
requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, opportunities for public
participation, prior publication, and delay in effective date under 5
U.S.C. 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (``APA''). As such, it
does not bind the Commission or any member of the general public. The
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, which apply when notice
and comment are required by the APA or another statute, are not
applicable.
Dated: December 27, 2006.
Robert D. Lenhard,
Vice Chairman, Federal Election Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-65 Filed 1-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P