Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District, 656-659 [E7-22]
Download as PDF
656
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 4 / Monday, January 8, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Chapter 20, Part II, Section 5–20–204 to
read as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR
part 52 continues to read as follows:
I
Dated: December 22, 2006.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
§ 52.2420
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
*
Subpart VV—Virginia
I
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
2. In § 52.2420, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
I
EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES
State
citation
(9 VAC 5)
Title/subject
*
State
effective
date
*
*
Chapter 20
*
*
*
Part II
*
5–20–204
*
Nonattainment Areas
*
*
*
*
5/4/05
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2006–0843; FRL–8261–3]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, South Coast Air
Quality Management District and
Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the South
Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) and the Ventura County Air
Pollution Control District (VCAPCD)
portions of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This action
revises various definitions of terms used
by the SCAQMD and rescinds
duplicative requirements for landfills
from the VCAPCD. We are approving
and rescinding these local rules under
the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
(CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on March 9,
2007 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by February
7, 2007. If we receive such comments,
we will publish a timely withdrawal in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:32 Jan 05, 2007
*
General Provisions
*
Air Quality Programs
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1/8/07 [Insert page number where the
document begins]
*
[FR Doc. E6–22552 Filed 1–5–07; 8:45 am]
Explanation
[former SIP citation]
EPA approval date
*
*
the Federal Register to notify the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2006–0843, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air–4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send e-mail
directly to EPA, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the public comment.
If EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may
not be able to consider your comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
*
*
Paragraph 5–20–204A.3 is added.
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
https://www.regulations.gov and in hard
copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cynthia G. Allen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action.
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules we are
approving and rescinding with the date
that they were adopted by the local air
E:\FR\FM\08JAR1.SGM
08JAR1
657
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 4 / Monday, January 8, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
agency and submitted by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB).
Local agency
Rule #
SCAQMD ....................................
VCAPCD ....................................
102
74.17
On July 21, 2006 (SCAQMD) and
August 18, 2005 (VCAPCD), these rule
submittals were found to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51
Appendix V, which must be met before
formal EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of these
rules?
We approved versions of these rules
into the SIP on the dates listed:
SCAQMD Rule 102 on February 3, 2000
and VCAPCD Rule 74.17 on October 4,
1994. SCAQMD adopted a revision to
the SIP approved version of Rule 102 on
October 19, 2001 which was not
submitted to us by CARB.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires
states to submit regulations that control
volatile organic compounds, oxides of
nitrogen, particulate matter, and other
air pollutants which harm human health
and the environment. These rules were
developed as part of the local agency’s
program to control these pollutants.
South Coast Rule 102 has been
revised to add the following definitions:
Agricultural Permit Unit, Agricultural
Source, Clean Air Solvent Certificate,
Confined Animal Facility (CAF),
Hazardous Air Pollutant, Orchard
Heater, and Orchard Wind Machine.
Ventura Rule 74.17 is being rescinded
in its entirety because sources
previously subject to this rule are now
subject to Rule 74.17.1, which has been
approved as part of the California State
Plan for landfills and is federally
enforceable.
EPA’s technical support documents
(TSD) have more information about
these rules.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rule?
SCAQMD Rule 102 provides
definitions that support emission
controls found in other local agency
requirements. VCAPCD Rule 74.17 is
being rescinded because the
requirements for controlling VOC
emissions from landfills are federally
enforceable through another
mechanism. In combination with the
other requirements, rule revisions must
be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
Act) and must not relax existing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Jan 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
Rule title
Adopted
Definition of Terms ..........................................................................
Solid Waste Disposal Sites (Rule Rescission) ...............................
requirements (see sections 110(l) and
193). EPA policy that we used to help
evaluate enforceability requirements
consistently includes the Bluebook
(‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations,’’ EPA, May 25, 1988) and
the Little Bluebook (‘‘Guidance
Document for Correcting Common VOC
& Other Rule Deficiencies,’’ EPA Region
9, August 21, 2001).
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
We believe these revisions are
consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability and
SIP relaxations. The TSD has more
information on our evaluation.
C. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, EPA is fully approving the
submitted rule revisions because we
believe they fulfill all relevant
requirements. We do not think anyone
will object to this approval, so we are
finalizing it without proposing it in
advance. However, in the Proposed
Rules section of this Federal Register,
we are simultaneously proposing
approval of the same submitted rule
revisions. If we receive adverse
comments by February 7, 2007, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that the direct final approval will not
take effect and we will address the
comments in a subsequent final action
based on the proposal. If we do not
receive timely adverse comments, the
direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on March 9,
2007. This will incorporate this rule
into the federally enforceable SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this regulatory
action from Executive Order 12866,
entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review.’’
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
These rules do not impose an
information collection burden under the
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12/03/04
03/10/98
Submitted
06/16/06
07/15/05
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
generally requires an agency to conduct
a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment
rulemaking requirements unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small not-for-profit enterprises, and
small governmental jurisdictions.
These rules will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities because SIP approvals under
section 110 and subchapter I, part D of
the Clean Air Act do not create any new
requirements but simply approve
requirements that the State is already
imposing. Therefore, because the
Federal SIP approval does not create
any new requirements, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the
Federal-State relationship under the
Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility
analysis would constitute Federal
inquiry into the economic
reasonableness of state action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its
actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S.
EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255–66 (1976); 42
U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under sections 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(‘‘Unfunded Mandates Act’’), signed
into law on March 22, 1995, EPA must
prepare a budgetary impact statement to
accompany any proposed or final rule
that includes a Federal mandate that
may result in estimated costs to State,
local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate; or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more. Under section
205, EPA must select the most costeffective and least burdensome
alternative that achieves the objectives
of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203
requires EPA to establish a plan for
informing and advising any small
E:\FR\FM\08JAR1.SGM
08JAR1
658
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 4 / Monday, January 8, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
governments that may be significantly
or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval
action promulgated does not include a
Federal mandate that may result in
estimated costs of $100 million or more
to either State, local, or tribal
governments in the aggregate, or to the
private sector. This Federal action
approves pre-existing requirements
under State or local law, and imposes
no new requirements. Accordingly, no
additional costs to State, local, or tribal
governments, or to the private sector,
result from this action.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) revokes and replaces Executive
Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12875
(Enhancing the Intergovernmental
Partnership). Executive Order 13132
requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ Under
Executive Order 13132, EPA may not
issue a regulation that has federalism
implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not
required by statute, unless the Federal
government provides the funds
necessary to pay the direct compliance
costs incurred by State and local
governments, or EPA consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation. EPA also may not issue a
regulation that has federalism
implications and that preempts State
law unless the Agency consults with
State and local officials early in the
process of developing the proposed
regulation.
These rules will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, because it
merely approves a state rule
implementing a federal standard, and
does not alter the relationship or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. Thus, the requirements of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:04 Jan 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
section 6 of the Executive Order do not
apply to this rule.
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ This final rule does not
have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
applies to any rule that: (1) Is
determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
the Agency must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of
the planned rule on children, and
explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective
and reasonably feasible alternatives
considered by the Agency.
These rules are not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because they do
not involve decisions intended to
mitigate environmental health or safety
risks.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
These rules are not subject to
Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
agencies to evaluate existing technical
standards when developing a new
regulation. To comply with NTTAA,
EPA must consider and use ‘‘voluntary
consensus standards’’ (VCS) if available
and applicable when developing
programs and policies unless doing so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical.
The EPA believes that VCS are
inapplicable to this action. Today’s
action does not require the public to
perform activities conducive to the use
of VCS.
J. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule
will be effective February 7, 2007.
K. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 9, 2007.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
E:\FR\FM\08JAR1.SGM
08JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 4 / Monday, January 8, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 11, 2006.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Subpart F—California
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
I
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
16:04 Jan 05, 2007
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
PART 52—[AMENDED]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(187)(i)(B)(5) and
(c)(345) to read as follows:
I
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(187) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(5) Previously approved on October 4,
1994 in paragraph (c)(187)(i)(B)(1) of
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
659
this section and now deleted without
replacement, Rule 74.17.
*
*
*
*
*
(345) New and amended regulations
for the following APCDs were submitted
on June 16, 2006, by the Governor’s
designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 102, adopted on December 3,
2004.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–22 Filed 1–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\08JAR1.SGM
08JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 4 (Monday, January 8, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 656-659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-22]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2006-0843; FRL-8261-3]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South
Coast Air Quality Management District and Ventura County Air Pollution
Control District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portions of the
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This action revises various
definitions of terms used by the SCAQMD and rescinds duplicative
requirements for landfills from the VCAPCD. We are approving and
rescinding these local rules under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990
(CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on March 9, 2007 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by February 7, 2007. If we receive
such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2006-0843, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous
access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at https://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia G. Allen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4120, allen.cynthia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action.
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
C. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules we are approving and rescinding with the
date that they were adopted by the local air
[[Page 657]]
agency and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule Rule title Adopted Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD.................................... 102 Definition of Terms.......... 12/03/04 06/16/06
VCAPCD.................................... 74.17 Solid Waste Disposal Sites 03/10/98 07/15/05
(Rule Rescission).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 21, 2006 (SCAQMD) and August 18, 2005 (VCAPCD), these rule
submittals were found to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part
51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
We approved versions of these rules into the SIP on the dates
listed: SCAQMD Rule 102 on February 3, 2000 and VCAPCD Rule 74.17 on
October 4, 1994. SCAQMD adopted a revision to the SIP approved version
of Rule 102 on October 19, 2001 which was not submitted to us by CARB.
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations
that control volatile organic compounds, oxides of nitrogen,
particulate matter, and other air pollutants which harm human health
and the environment. These rules were developed as part of the local
agency's program to control these pollutants.
South Coast Rule 102 has been revised to add the following
definitions: Agricultural Permit Unit, Agricultural Source, Clean Air
Solvent Certificate, Confined Animal Facility (CAF), Hazardous Air
Pollutant, Orchard Heater, and Orchard Wind Machine.
Ventura Rule 74.17 is being rescinded in its entirety because
sources previously subject to this rule are now subject to Rule
74.17.1, which has been approved as part of the California State Plan
for landfills and is federally enforceable.
EPA's technical support documents (TSD) have more information about
these rules.
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rule?
SCAQMD Rule 102 provides definitions that support emission controls
found in other local agency requirements. VCAPCD Rule 74.17 is being
rescinded because the requirements for controlling VOC emissions from
landfills are federally enforceable through another mechanism. In
combination with the other requirements, rule revisions must be
enforceable (see section 110(a) of the Act) and must not relax existing
requirements (see sections 110(l) and 193). EPA policy that we used to
help evaluate enforceability requirements consistently includes the
Bluebook (``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies,
and Deviations,'' EPA, May 25, 1988) and the Little Bluebook
(``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies,'' EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001).
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
We believe these revisions are consistent with the relevant policy
and guidance regarding enforceability and SIP relaxations. The TSD has
more information on our evaluation.
C. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully
approving the submitted rule revisions because we believe they fulfill
all relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rule revisions.
If we receive adverse comments by February 7, 2007, we will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the
direct final approval will not take effect and we will address the
comments in a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do
not receive timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be
effective without further notice on March 9, 2007. This will
incorporate this rule into the federally enforceable SIP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this
regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory
Planning and Review.''
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
These rules do not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.)
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small not-for-profit enterprises, and small governmental
jurisdictions.
These rules will not have a significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities because SIP approvals under section 110 and
subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new
requirements but simply approve requirements that the State is already
imposing. Therefore, because the Federal SIP approval does not create
any new requirements, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Moreover, due to the nature of the Federal-State relationship under
the Clean Air Act, preparation of flexibility analysis would constitute
Federal inquiry into the economic reasonableness of state action. The
Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such
grounds. Union Electric Co., v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976);
42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Under sections 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(``Unfunded Mandates Act''), signed into law on March 22, 1995, EPA
must prepare a budgetary impact statement to accompany any proposed or
final rule that includes a Federal mandate that may result in estimated
costs to State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate; or to
the private sector, of $100 million or more. Under section 205, EPA
must select the most cost-effective and least burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule and is consistent with
statutory requirements. Section 203 requires EPA to establish a plan
for informing and advising any small
[[Page 658]]
governments that may be significantly or uniquely impacted by the rule.
EPA has determined that the approval action promulgated does not
include a Federal mandate that may result in estimated costs of $100
million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments in the
aggregate, or to the private sector. This Federal action approves pre-
existing requirements under State or local law, and imposes no new
requirements. Accordingly, no additional costs to State, local, or
tribal governments, or to the private sector, result from this action.
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) revokes and replaces
Executive Orders 12612 (Federalism) and 12875 (Enhancing the
Intergovernmental Partnership). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to
develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' Under Executive Order 13132, EPA may not issue a
regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs, and that is not required by statute, unless
the Federal government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct
compliance costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA
consults with State and local officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation. EPA also may not issue a regulation
that has federalism implications and that preempts State law unless the
Agency consults with State and local officials early in the process of
developing the proposed regulation.
These rules will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, because it
merely approves a state rule implementing a federal standard, and does
not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order do not apply to this
rule.
F. Executive Order 13175, Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' This final rule does not have
tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. It will not
have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), applies to any rule that: (1) Is
determined to be ``economically significant'' as defined under
Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or
safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the
planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible
alternatives considered by the Agency.
These rules are not subject to Executive Order 13045 because they
do not involve decisions intended to mitigate environmental health or
safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions that Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
These rules are not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) of 1995 requires Federal agencies to evaluate existing
technical standards when developing a new regulation. To comply with
NTTAA, EPA must consider and use ``voluntary consensus standards''
(VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies
unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
impractical.
The EPA believes that VCS are inapplicable to this action. Today's
action does not require the public to perform activities conducive to
the use of VCS.
J. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2). This rule will be effective February 7, 2007.
K. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 9, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
[[Page 659]]
Dated: December 11, 2006.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(187)(i)(B)(5) and
(c)(345) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(187) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(5) Previously approved on October 4, 1994 in paragraph
(c)(187)(i)(B)(1) of this section and now deleted without replacement,
Rule 74.17.
* * * * *
(345) New and amended regulations for the following APCDs were
submitted on June 16, 2006, by the Governor's designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 102, adopted on December 3, 2004.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-22 Filed 1-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P