Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA-Groupe AEROSPATIALE Models M.S. 760, M.S. 760 A, and M.S. 760 B Airplanes, 483-485 [E6-22578]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 3 / Friday, January 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Alpha Aviation Design Limited (Type
Certificate No. A48EU previously held
by APEX Aircraft and AVIONS PIERRE
ROBIN): Docket No. FAA–2006–26496;
Directorate Identifier 2006–CE–81–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by February
5, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Model R2160
airplanes, serial numbers 001 through 378,
certificated in any category.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states that
there have been instances indicating that
production aircraft may not have a metal
barrier between the cabin and the fuel tank
bay. Lack of a barrier could allow flammable
fuel vapors to enter the cabin. The MCAI
requires that, to ensure that the aircraft is in
compliance with 14 CFR 23.967(d), inspect
the aircraft to determine if a metal barrier is
installed behind the seats and, if not
installed, to manufacture and install a
barrier.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following
actions within the next 100 hours time-inservice or within 6 months of the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(1) Inspect the aircraft to determine if a
metal barrier is installed behind the seats per
Alpha Aviation Service Bulletin AA–SB–28–
001, dated July 10, 2006.
(2) If a metal barrier is installed per Alpha
Aviation Service Bulletin AA–SB–28–001,
dated July 10, 2006, and (e)(1) of this AD
then no further action is required.
(3) If a metal barrier is not installed,
manufacture and install a barrier per Alpha
Aviation Service Bulletin AA–SB–28–001,
dated July 10, 2006 and Alpha Aviation
Drawing No. 60–53–119 (page 3 of 3 of the
Service Bulletin).
FAA AD Differences
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(f) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Staff,
FAA, ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816)
329–4090, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:47 Jan 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(g) Refer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority
of New Zealand AD DCA/R2000/38, dated
June 29, 2006, and Alpha Aviation Service
Bulletin AA–SB–28–001, dated July 10, 2006,
for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
December 28, 2006.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–22577 Filed 1–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26489; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–74–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; SOCATAGroupe AEROSPATIALE Models M.S.
760, M.S. 760 A, and M.S. 760 B
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Following Safety Alert No. SA–006, issued
by the National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB) on aircraft icing, it was impossible to
demonstrate that the aircraft can safely
takeoff when contaminated by frost, ice,
snow, or slush, and fly into icing conditions.
The proposed AD would require actions
that are intended to address the unsafe
condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by February 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
483
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4119; fax: (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new
process for streamlining the issuance of
ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined
process will allow us to adopt MCAI
safety requirements in a more efficient
manner and will reduce safety risks to
the public. This process continues to
follow all FAA AD issuance processes to
meet legal, economic, Administrative
Procedure Act, and Federal Register
requirements. We also continue to meet
our technical decision-making
responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated
products.
This proposed AD references the
MCAI and related service information
that we considered in forming the
engineering basis to correct the unsafe
condition. The proposed AD contains
text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain
language principles.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
484
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 3 / Friday, January 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2006–26489; Directorate Identifier
2006–CE–74–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued Emergency
Airworthiness Directive AD No. 2006–
0348–E, dated November 20, 2006,
referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’, to
correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Following Safety Alert No. SA–006, issued
by the National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB) on aircraft icing, it was impossible to
demonstrate that the aircraft can safely
takeoff when contaminated by frost, ice,
snow, or slush and fly into icing conditions.
The MCAI requires operational
limitation on takeoff with
contamination and requirement for a
pre-takeoff check in ground icing
conditions and flight into icing
conditions. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Relevant Service Information
EADS SOCATA has issued MS760
Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB
SB 76–053, ATA No. 30, dated October
2006. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:47 Jan 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the
proposed AD. These requirements, if
ultimately adopted, will take
precedence over the actions copied from
the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 41 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $80 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $3,280, or $80 per
product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
SOCATA-Groupe AEROSPATIALE: Docket
No. FAA–2006–26489; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–74–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by February
5, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Models M.S. 760,
M.S. 760 A, and M.S. 760 B airplanes, all
serial numbers, certificated in any category.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
following Safety Alert No. SA–006, issued by
the National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB) on aircraft icing, it was impossible to
demonstrate that the aircraft can safely
takeoff when contaminated by frost, ice,
snow, or slush and fly into icing conditions.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Do the following unless already done:
(1) Prior to the next flight after the effective
date of this AD, insert a copy of this AD into
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 3 / Friday, January 5, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the Limitations Section of the Airplane Flight
Manual (AFM) to incorporate the following.
(i) Takeoff with frost, ice, snow, or slush
on the wing, control surfaces, horizontal tail,
and air intakes, and flight into icing
conditions are prohibited.
(ii) Prior to each flight in which ground
icing conditions exist as described in EADS
SOCATA MS760 Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 76–053, ATA No. 30, dated
October 2006, perform a visual/tactile check.
No visible trace of frost is acceptable
particularly on stabilizers and wing upper
surfaces and leading edges as well as on air
intakes.
(2) The owner/operator holding at least a
private pilot certificate as authorized by
section 43.7 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may do the actions
of this AD. Make an entry into the aircraft
records showing compliance with this AD in
accordance with section 43.9 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 43.9).
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: We added
information in paragraph (e) that allows the
owner/operator to insert a copy of this AD
into the Limitation Section of the AFM.
Without this information, a licensed
mechanic would be required to do the AFM
insertion.
Other FAA AD Provisions
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
(f) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Staff,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, ATTN:
Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace Engineer, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4119; fax: (816)
329–4090, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(g) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency Emergency Airworthiness
Directive AD No. 2006–0348–E, dated
November 20, 2006, and EADS SOCATA
MS760 Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin
SB 76–053, ATA No. 30, dated October 2006,
for related information.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:34 Jan 04, 2007
Jkt 211001
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
December 28, 2006.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–22578 Filed 1–4–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26497; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–82–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives;
Przedsiebiorstwo DoswiadczalnoProdukcyjne Szybownictwa ‘‘PZL–
Bielsko’’ Model SZD–50–3 ‘‘Puchacz’’
Gliders
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Some cases of turnbuckle adjusting screws
fatigue failure have occurred, due to lateral
load component applied by pilot’s foot. Such
events may lead to rudder and pedals
disconnection.
The proposed AD would require
actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by February 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may sent comments by
any of the following methods:
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
485
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Davison, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
4130; fax: (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new
process for streamlining the issuance of
ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined
process will allow us to adopt MCAI
safety requirements in a more efficient
manner and will reduce safety risks to
the public. This process continues to
follow all FAA AD issuance processes to
meet legal, economic, Administrative
Procedure Act and Federal Register
requirements. We also continue to meet
our technical decision-making
responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated
products.
This proposed AD references the
MCAI and related service information
that we considered in forming the
engineering basis to correct the unsafe
condition. The proposed AD contains
text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain
language principles.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2006–26497; Directorate Identifier
2006–CE–82–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
E:\FR\FM\05JAP1.SGM
05JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 3 (Friday, January 5, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 483-485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22578]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-26489; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-74-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; SOCATA-Groupe AEROSPATIALE Models M.S.
760, M.S. 760 A, and M.S. 760 B Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
Following Safety Alert No. SA-006, issued by the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on aircraft icing, it was
impossible to demonstrate that the aircraft can safely takeoff when
contaminated by frost, ice, snow, or slush, and fly into icing
conditions.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 5,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
DOT Docket Web Site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Albert J. Mercado, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4119; fax: (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new process for streamlining the issuance
of ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined process will allow us to adopt
MCAI safety requirements in a more efficient manner and will reduce
safety risks to the public. This process continues to follow all FAA AD
issuance processes to meet legal, economic, Administrative Procedure
Act, and Federal Register requirements. We also continue to meet our
technical decision-making responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated products.
This proposed AD references the MCAI and related service
information that we considered in forming the engineering basis to
correct the unsafe condition. The proposed AD contains text copied from
the MCAI and for this reason might not follow our plain language
principles.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about
[[Page 484]]
this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2006-26489; Directorate
Identifier 2006-CE-74-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed
AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued
Emergency Airworthiness Directive AD No. 2006-0348-E, dated November
20, 2006, referred to after this as ``the MCAI'', to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
Following Safety Alert No. SA-006, issued by the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on aircraft icing, it was
impossible to demonstrate that the aircraft can safely takeoff when
contaminated by frost, ice, snow, or slush and fly into icing
conditions.
The MCAI requires operational limitation on takeoff with contamination
and requirement for a pre-takeoff check in ground icing conditions and
flight into icing conditions. You may obtain further information by
examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
EADS SOCATA has issued MS760 Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB
SB 76-053, ATA No. 30, dated October 2006. The actions described in
this service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the proposed AD. These
requirements, if ultimately adopted, will take precedence over the
actions copied from the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 41 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the proposed
AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $3,280, or $80 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
SOCATA-Groupe AEROSPATIALE: Docket No. FAA-2006-26489; Directorate
Identifier 2006-CE-74-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by February 5, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Models M.S. 760, M.S. 760 A, and M.S. 760
B airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any category.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
following Safety Alert No. SA-006, issued by the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on aircraft icing, it was
impossible to demonstrate that the aircraft can safely takeoff when
contaminated by frost, ice, snow, or slush and fly into icing
conditions.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Do the following unless already done:
(1) Prior to the next flight after the effective date of this
AD, insert a copy of this AD into
[[Page 485]]
the Limitations Section of the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) to
incorporate the following.
(i) Takeoff with frost, ice, snow, or slush on the wing, control
surfaces, horizontal tail, and air intakes, and flight into icing
conditions are prohibited.
(ii) Prior to each flight in which ground icing conditions exist
as described in EADS SOCATA MS760 Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB 76-053, ATA No. 30, dated October 2006, perform a
visual/tactile check. No visible trace of frost is acceptable
particularly on stabilizers and wing upper surfaces and leading
edges as well as on air intakes.
(2) The owner/operator holding at least a private pilot
certificate as authorized by section 43.7 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR 43.7) may do the actions of this AD. Make an
entry into the aircraft records showing compliance with this AD in
accordance with section 43.9 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 43.9).
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: We added information in paragraph (e) that allows the
owner/operator to insert a copy of this AD into the Limitation
Section of the AFM. Without this information, a licensed mechanic
would be required to do the AFM insertion.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(f) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Staff, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, ATTN: Albert J.
Mercado, Aerospace Engineer, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4119; fax: (816) 329-4090, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(g) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Emergency
Airworthiness Directive AD No. 2006-0348-E, dated November 20, 2006,
and EADS SOCATA MS760 Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 76-053,
ATA No. 30, dated October 2006, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on December 28, 2006.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-22578 Filed 1-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P