Pipeline Safety: Lessons Learned From a Security Breach at a Liquefied Natural Gas Facility, 78269 [E6-22323]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA–04–19856]
Pipeline Safety: Lessons Learned
From a Security Breach at a Liquefied
Natural Gas Facility
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory
Bulletin.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This advisory reminds
operators of the need for vigilance in
providing security at liquefied natural
gas (LNG) facilities. PHMSA’s pipeline
safety regulations require operators to
implement security measures that deter
intruders at LNG terminals, facilities,
and peak-shaving plants. This Advisory
Bulletin reinforces the importance of
effectively implementing and
thoroughly testing security procedures
and systems.
ADDRESSES: This document can be
viewed on the PHMSA home page at:
https://www.phmsa.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy
Kadnar at (202) 366–0568, or by e-mail
at Joy.Kadnar@dot.gov; or Buddy Secor
at (571) 227–1306, or by e-mail at
Buddy.Secor@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
PHMSA’s pipeline safety regulations
require operators to implement security
measures that deter intruders. These
measures include written procedures,
protective enclosures, security
communication, lighting, and
monitoring (49 CFR part 193, subpart J).
Operators must use staff who have been
trained to carry out security duties
through means that include security
training (49 CFR 193.2709 and 2715).
Operators need to implement these
measures in ways that ensure personnel
and systems detect trespassers and
respond correctly.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
LNG Facility Security: Lessons Learned
From the Security Breach in Lynn, MA
A recent breach in security at an LNG
facility shows the need for preparedness
and vigilance. The operator discovered
a breach of security at its LNG facility
during routine maintenance on a gate at
the side of the storage tank. Although
there was no damage to the tank,
intruders had broken through the gate to
gain access to the tank.
Investigation revealed that the
intruders had cut through the outer and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
inner perimeter fences and through the
locked gate and gained access to the
storage tank several days before the
breach was discovered. A microwave
intrusion system documented the
intrusions on the computer monitoring
system, which should have alerted
operator personnel to the intrusions.
Operator personnel did not respond. In
the days following, personnel
conducted several routine visual
inspections of the area without noting
the cuts in the fences. Although there
was also video surveillance of the
perimeter, personnel did not review the
tape until they investigated the breach.
State authorities responded quickly to
examine security at other LNG facilities
in the state. These authorities inspected
operator practices and procedures to
ensure personnel and systems respond
correctly during a security breach.
II. Advisory Bulletin (ADB–06–04)
To: Owners and Operators of LNG
Plants That Contain LNG.
Subject: Security at LNG facilities.
Advisory: The pipeline safety
regulations require an operator of LNG
facilities in a plant containing LNG to
develop and follow written procedures
for security at the LNG plant. Operators
need to verify the reliability and
feasibility of security procedures and
systems. Operators also need to ensure
personnel and systems respond
correctly when security is
compromised.
LNG Facility Security: Lessons Learned
from the Security Breach in Lynn, MA
PHMSA recommends LNG facility
operators establish and follow these
suggested practices and procedures to
ensure that their security measures
function as intended by the regulations,
and that security at their LNG plants is
rigorous:
• Test systems thoroughly to verify
that alarms work and that monitoring
devices function as intended;
• Ensure remotely stationed
personnel are properly trained on the
security procedures of each facility that
they monitor;
• Determine whether personnel
monitoring security for an LNG plant
can realistically respond to security
breaches in a timely manner;
• Update security procedures as
needed to provide effective security at
the LNG plant and to incorporate the
most relevant threat information;
• Confirm that remote monitoring
station personnel properly coordinate
activities with those parties responsible
for LNG plant facility security; and,
• Independently audit LNG plant
security or conduct unannounced tests
PO 00000
Frm 00142
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78269
of security systems, procedures, and
personnel.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. chapter 601; 49 CFR
1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
22, 2006.
Theodore L. Willke,
Acting Associate Administrator for Pipeline
Safety.
[FR Doc. E6–22323 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
[Docket No.: PHMSA–97–2995]
Pipeline Safety: Random Drug Testing
Rate
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of minimum annual
percentage rate for random drug testing.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: PHMSA has determined that
the minimum random drug testing rate
for covered employees will remain at 25
percent during calendar year 2007.
DATE: Effective January 1, 2007, through
December 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cindy Ingrao, Director, Drug and
Alcohol Policy and Investigations,
PHMSA, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 8406, Washington, DC
20590, telephone (202) 366–2350 or
email cindy.ingrao@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Operators
of gas, hazardous liquid, and carbon
dioxide pipelines and operators of
liquefied natural gas facilities must
select and test a percentage of covered
employees for random drug testing.
Pursuant to 49 CFR part 199.105(c)(2),
(3), and (4), the PHMSA Administrator’s
decision on whether to change the
minimum annual random drug testing
rate is based on the reported random
drug test positive rate for the pipeline
industry. The data considered by the
Administrator comes from operators’
annual submissions of Management
Information System (MIS) reports
required by 49 CFR part 199.119(a). If
the reported random drug test positive
rate is less than 1.00 percent, the
Administrator may continue the
minimum random drug testing rate at 25
percent. In 2005, the random drug test
positive rate was less than 1.00 percent.
Therefore, the minimum random drug
testing rate will remain at 25 percent for
calendar year 2007.
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 78269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22323]
[[Page 78269]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
[Docket No. PHMSA-04-19856]
Pipeline Safety: Lessons Learned From a Security Breach at a
Liquefied Natural Gas Facility
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Notice; Issuance of Advisory Bulletin.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This advisory reminds operators of the need for vigilance in
providing security at liquefied natural gas (LNG) facilities. PHMSA's
pipeline safety regulations require operators to implement security
measures that deter intruders at LNG terminals, facilities, and peak-
shaving plants. This Advisory Bulletin reinforces the importance of
effectively implementing and thoroughly testing security procedures and
systems.
ADDRESSES: This document can be viewed on the PHMSA home page at:
https://www.phmsa.dot.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joy Kadnar at (202) 366-0568, or by e-
mail at Joy.Kadnar@dot.gov; or Buddy Secor at (571) 227-1306, or by e-
mail at Buddy.Secor@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
PHMSA's pipeline safety regulations require operators to implement
security measures that deter intruders. These measures include written
procedures, protective enclosures, security communication, lighting,
and monitoring (49 CFR part 193, subpart J). Operators must use staff
who have been trained to carry out security duties through means that
include security training (49 CFR 193.2709 and 2715). Operators need to
implement these measures in ways that ensure personnel and systems
detect trespassers and respond correctly.
LNG Facility Security: Lessons Learned From the Security Breach in
Lynn, MA
A recent breach in security at an LNG facility shows the need for
preparedness and vigilance. The operator discovered a breach of
security at its LNG facility during routine maintenance on a gate at
the side of the storage tank. Although there was no damage to the tank,
intruders had broken through the gate to gain access to the tank.
Investigation revealed that the intruders had cut through the outer
and inner perimeter fences and through the locked gate and gained
access to the storage tank several days before the breach was
discovered. A microwave intrusion system documented the intrusions on
the computer monitoring system, which should have alerted operator
personnel to the intrusions. Operator personnel did not respond. In the
days following, personnel conducted several routine visual inspections
of the area without noting the cuts in the fences. Although there was
also video surveillance of the perimeter, personnel did not review the
tape until they investigated the breach.
State authorities responded quickly to examine security at other
LNG facilities in the state. These authorities inspected operator
practices and procedures to ensure personnel and systems respond
correctly during a security breach.
II. Advisory Bulletin (ADB-06-04)
To: Owners and Operators of LNG Plants That Contain LNG.
Subject: Security at LNG facilities.
Advisory: The pipeline safety regulations require an operator of
LNG facilities in a plant containing LNG to develop and follow written
procedures for security at the LNG plant. Operators need to verify the
reliability and feasibility of security procedures and systems.
Operators also need to ensure personnel and systems respond correctly
when security is compromised.
LNG Facility Security: Lessons Learned from the Security Breach in
Lynn, MA
PHMSA recommends LNG facility operators establish and follow these
suggested practices and procedures to ensure that their security
measures function as intended by the regulations, and that security at
their LNG plants is rigorous:
Test systems thoroughly to verify that alarms work and
that monitoring devices function as intended;
Ensure remotely stationed personnel are properly trained
on the security procedures of each facility that they monitor;
Determine whether personnel monitoring security for an LNG
plant can realistically respond to security breaches in a timely
manner;
Update security procedures as needed to provide effective
security at the LNG plant and to incorporate the most relevant threat
information;
Confirm that remote monitoring station personnel properly
coordinate activities with those parties responsible for LNG plant
facility security; and,
Independently audit LNG plant security or conduct
unannounced tests of security systems, procedures, and personnel.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. chapter 601; 49 CFR 1.53.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 22, 2006.
Theodore L. Willke,
Acting Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. E6-22323 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P