Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Near East Asia-South Asia Undergraduate Exchange Program, 78256-78260 [E6-22321]
Download as PDF
78256
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as
amended, and Delegation of Authority
No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875],
I hereby determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘Dead Sea
Scrolls’’, imported from abroad for
temporary exhibition within the United
States, are of cultural significance. The
objects are imported pursuant to loan
agreements with the foreign owners or
custodians. I also determine that the
exhibition or display of the exhibit
objects at the San Diego Natural History
Museum, San Diego, California, from on
or about June 29, 2007, until on or about
January 15, 2008, and at possible
additional venues yet to be determined,
is in the national interest. Public Notice
of these Determinations is ordered to be
published in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr
Sulzynsky, Attorney-Adviser, Office of
the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of
State (telephone: (202) 453–8050). The
address is U.S. Department of State, SA–
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700,
Washington, DC 20547–0001.
Dated: December 20, 2006.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department
of State.
[FR Doc. E6–22319 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5656]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Near East Asia—South Asia
Undergraduate Exchange Program
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/E/NEA–SCA–07–01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: February 15,
2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of
Academic Exchange Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs announces an open competition
to administer the FY2007 Near East and
South Asia Undergraduate Exchange
Program. Consortia of accredited, postsecondary educational institutions and
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) in the United
States may submit proposals to organize
and carry out academic exchange
activities for students from
underrepresented sectors in the Middle
East, North Africa and South Asia
(eligible countries and locales are listed
below in the Purpose section). The
grantee organization will be responsible
for the following aspects of the program:
placement of no less than 150 foreign
students at accredited U.S. institutions
for a semester or academic year, student
travel to the U.S., orientation,
enrichment programming, advising,
monitoring and support, pre-return
activities, evaluation, and follow-up
with program alumni. It is anticipated
that the total amount of funding for
FY2007 administrative and program
costs will be $3,000,000.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations* * *and thus to assist in the
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose: The principal objective of
the Near East and South Asia
Undergraduate Exchange Program
(herein referred to as the
‘‘Undergraduate Program’’) is to provide
a substantive exchange experience at a
U.S. college or university to a diverse
group of emerging student leaders from
underrepresented sectors in the Middle
East, North Africa and South Asia. In
this context, the cooperating
organization should ensure that
participants are able to enroll full-time
in courses at U.S. institutions alongside
American peers, and provide the
participants with opportunities to
understand America and Americans
inside and outside the classroom.
Participants will return to their home
countries at the conclusion of the
exchange program to re-enter colleges
and universities there, and re-integrate
PO 00000
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
with their home societies. It is also an
objective of the program to provide
participants with tailored instruction in
the academic skills and study habits
required to be successful at the
undergraduate level.
The Undergraduate Program will
provide no less than 150 scholarships:
Approximately 40 scholarships for one
academic year and 110 for one semester,
at U.S. institutions of higher education
to outstanding students from non-elite
sectors from the Near East (countries/
locales may include Algeria, Bahrain,
Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon,
Libya, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi
Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab
Emirates, Yemen, West Bank/Gaza) and
South Asia (India, Pakistan, and
Bangladesh). Scholarships will be
granted primarily to students who are
currently enrolled in an undergraduate
degree program in their home country.
Participants may range from those about
to enter university in their home
country to those who have just
completed their undergraduate degree,
and those between these two stages. The
cooperating organization will place onesemester program participants and
academic-year participants in nondegree programs at both U.S. four-year
colleges and universities, and
community colleges.
The cooperating organization should
develop enrichment activities to
enhance the participants’ academic
education, including having students
make local presentations about their
countries, community service, and
internships. All participants are
required to return to their home
countries immediately upon the
conclusion of the program. Transfers of
academic program or visa sponsorship
of participants to another U.S.
institution will not be considered.
ECA will award one cooperative
agreement for this program. Programs
and projects must conform with Bureau
requirements and guidelines outlined in
the Solicitation Package. ECA programs
are subject to the availability of funds.
Programs must comply with J–1 Visa
regulations. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for further
information.
In a cooperative agreement, the Near
East, South and Central Asia Branch of
the Office of Academic Exchange
Programs in the Bureau of Educational
and Cultural Affairs (ECA/A/E/NEA–
SCA) is substantially involved in
program activities above and beyond
routine grant monitoring. ECA/A/E/
NEA–SCA activities and responsibilities
for this program are, but not limited to,
the following:
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
1. Participating in the design and
direction of program activities;
2. Approval of key personnel;
3. Final selection of program
participants;
4. Approval and input for all program
agendas and timelines;
5. Final approval of all student
placements;
6. Guidance in execution of all project
components;
7. Arrangement for State Department
speakers during workshops;
8. Assistance with participant
emergencies;
9. Providing background information
related to participants’ home countries
and cultures; and
10. Liaison with Public Affairs
Sections of the U.S. Embassies and
country desk officers at the State
Department.
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
Note: All materials, publicity, and
correspondence related to the program must
acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S.
Department of State. The Bureau will retain
copyright use of and distribute materials
related to this program is it sees fit.
a. Bureau grant guidelines require that
organizations with less than four years
of experience in conducting
international exchange programs will be
limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding.
ECA anticipates awarding one grant, in
the amount of $3,000,000 to support the
program and administrative costs
required to implement the program.
Therefore, applicant organizations with
less then four years experience in
conducting international exchange
programs are ineligible.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY2007.
Approximate Total Funding:
$3,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, the anticipated
program start date will be April 2, 2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
December 31, 2008.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew this grant for two
additional fiscal years, before openly
competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by accredited, postsecondary educational institutions and
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost-Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition.
However, the Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support
of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request
an Application Package: Please contact
the Near East, South and Central Asia
Branch, Office of Academic Exchange
Programs, ECA/A/E/NEA–SCA, Room
252, U.S. Department of State, SA–44,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547, 202–453–8096, Fax: 202–453–
8095 or AlamiLT@state.gov to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/
E/NEA–SCA–07–01 located at the top of
this announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation.
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78257
It also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Program Officer, Laura
Alami and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/NEA–
SCA–07–01 located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm, or from the Grants.gov
Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under
IV.3f. ‘‘Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please refer to the solicitation
package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
78258
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa: The Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is
placing renewed emphasis on the secure
and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by grantees and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Grantee will be responsible for
issuing DS–2019 forms to participants
in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, FAX: (202) 453–8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and physical challenges.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to
adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program
administration and in program content.
Please refer to the review criteria under
the ‘Support for Diversity’ section for
specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law
104–319 provides that ‘‘in carrying out
programs of educational and cultural
exchange in countries whose people do
not fully enjoy freedom and
democracy,’’ the Bureau ‘‘shall take
appropriate steps to provide
opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation. Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
grantee will track participants or
partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including
satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and
effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work
or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding
as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e.,
sustainability, overall program
management, staffing, coordination with
ECA and PAS or any other
requirements, etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
1. Participant expenses.
2. Administrative costs.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: Thursday,
February 15, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/NEASCA–07–01.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed
Applications.
Applications must be shipped no later
than the above deadline. Delivery
services used by applicants must have
in-place, centralized shipping
identification and tracking systems that
may be accessed via the Internet and
delivery people who are identifiable by
commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on
or before the above deadline but
received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for
further consideration under this
competition. Proposals shipped after the
established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and eight (8) copies of
the application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/A/E/NEA–SCA–07–01, Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk.
The Bureau will provide these files
electronically to the appropriate Public
Affairs Section(s) at the U.S. embassies
for their review.
IV.3f.2—Submitting Electronic
Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ’Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several
weeks. Therefore, applicants should
check with appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount
of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of
the application and the speed of your
Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait
until the application deadline to begin
the submission process through
Grants.gov. Direct all questions
regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer
Support, Contact Center Phone:
800–518–4726, Business Hours:
Monday–Friday, 7 a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern
Time, e-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78259
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission.
2. Ability to achieve program
objectives: Detailed agenda and relevant
work plan should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical
capacity. Agenda and plan should
adhere to the program overview and
guidelines described above. Objectives
should be reasonable, feasible, and
flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will
meet the program’s objectives and plan.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed
programs should strengthen long-term
mutual understanding, including
maximum sharing of information and
establishment of long-term institutional
and individual linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(selection of participants, program
venue and program evaluation) and
program content (orientation and wrapup sessions, program meetings, resource
materials and follow-up activities).
5. Institution’s Record/Capacity:
Proposals should demonstrate an
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
78260
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff.
Proposals should demonstrate capacity
to place students at geographically
diverse, accredited small colleges and
universities that can provide students
personalized attention. The Bureau will
consider the past performance of prior
recipients and the demonstrated
potential of new applicants. Proposed
personnel and institutional resources
should be adequate and appropriate to
achieve the program or project’s goals.
6. Project Evaluation and Follow-on:
Proposals should include a plan to
evaluate the activity’s success, both as
the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives is recommended. Proposals
should also provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (with
minimal Bureau support) ensuring that
Bureau supported programs are not
isolated events.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an
Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau’s Grants Office. The
AAD and the original grant proposal
with subsequent modifications (if
applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
VI.2. Administrative and National
Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants;
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3 Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
1. A final program and financial
report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award;
2. Quarterly program and financial
reports that should include record
program activities from that period.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. (Please refer to IV.
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3.d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation
information).
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
Optional Program Data Requirements:
Organizations awarded grants will be
required to maintain specific data on
program participants and activities in an
electronically accessible database format
that can be shared with the Bureau as
required. As a minimum, the data must
include the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00133
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(1) Name, address, contact
information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on
funds provided by the grant or who
benefit from the grant funding but do
not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and
domestic travel, providing dates of
travel and cities in which any exchange
experiences take place. Final schedules
for in-country and U.S. activities must
be received by the ECA Program Officer
at least three work days prior to the
official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Laura Alami,
Near East, South and Central Asia
Branch, Office of Academic Exchange
Programs, ECA/A/E/NEA–SCA, Room
252, ECA/A/E/NEA–SCA–07–01, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
202–453–8096 and Fax: 202–453–8095,
https://www.exchanges.state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the above title and number ECA/A/E/
NEA–SCA–07–01. Please read the
complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: December 21, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–22321 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78256-78260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22321]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5656]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Near East Asia--South Asia Undergraduate Exchange
Program
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA-07-01.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates:
Application Deadline: February 15, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Office of Academic Exchange Programs of the
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs announces an open
competition to administer the FY2007 Near East and South Asia
Undergraduate Exchange Program. Consortia of accredited, post-secondary
educational institutions and public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3) in the United States may submit proposals
to organize and carry out academic exchange activities for students
from underrepresented sectors in the Middle East, North Africa and
South Asia (eligible countries and locales are listed below in the
Purpose section). The grantee organization will be responsible for the
following aspects of the program: placement of no less than 150 foreign
students at accredited U.S. institutions for a semester or academic
year, student travel to the U.S., orientation, enrichment programming,
advising, monitoring and support, pre-return activities, evaluation,
and follow-up with program alumni. It is anticipated that the total
amount of funding for FY2007 administrative and program costs will be
$3,000,000.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations* * *and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The principal objective of the Near East and South Asia
Undergraduate Exchange Program (herein referred to as the
``Undergraduate Program'') is to provide a substantive exchange
experience at a U.S. college or university to a diverse group of
emerging student leaders from underrepresented sectors in the Middle
East, North Africa and South Asia. In this context, the cooperating
organization should ensure that participants are able to enroll full-
time in courses at U.S. institutions alongside American peers, and
provide the participants with opportunities to understand America and
Americans inside and outside the classroom.
Participants will return to their home countries at the conclusion
of the exchange program to re-enter colleges and universities there,
and re-integrate with their home societies. It is also an objective of
the program to provide participants with tailored instruction in the
academic skills and study habits required to be successful at the
undergraduate level.
The Undergraduate Program will provide no less than 150
scholarships: Approximately 40 scholarships for one academic year and
110 for one semester, at U.S. institutions of higher education to
outstanding students from non-elite sectors from the Near East
(countries/locales may include Algeria, Bahrain, Egypt, Israel, Jordan,
Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria,
Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, West Bank/Gaza) and South Asia
(India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh). Scholarships will be granted
primarily to students who are currently enrolled in an undergraduate
degree program in their home country. Participants may range from those
about to enter university in their home country to those who have just
completed their undergraduate degree, and those between these two
stages. The cooperating organization will place one-semester program
participants and academic-year participants in non-degree programs at
both U.S. four-year colleges and universities, and community colleges.
The cooperating organization should develop enrichment activities
to enhance the participants' academic education, including having
students make local presentations about their countries, community
service, and internships. All participants are required to return to
their home countries immediately upon the conclusion of the program.
Transfers of academic program or visa sponsorship of participants to
another U.S. institution will not be considered.
ECA will award one cooperative agreement for this program. Programs
and projects must conform with Bureau requirements and guidelines
outlined in the Solicitation Package. ECA programs are subject to the
availability of funds.
Programs must comply with J-1 Visa regulations. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for further information.
In a cooperative agreement, the Near East, South and Central Asia
Branch of the Office of Academic Exchange Programs in the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA) is substantially
involved in program activities above and beyond routine grant
monitoring. ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA activities and responsibilities for this
program are, but not limited to, the following:
[[Page 78257]]
1. Participating in the design and direction of program activities;
2. Approval of key personnel;
3. Final selection of program participants;
4. Approval and input for all program agendas and timelines;
5. Final approval of all student placements;
6. Guidance in execution of all project components;
7. Arrangement for State Department speakers during workshops;
8. Assistance with participant emergencies;
9. Providing background information related to participants' home
countries and cultures; and
10. Liaison with Public Affairs Sections of the U.S. Embassies and
country desk officers at the State Department.
Note: All materials, publicity, and correspondence related to
the program must acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. The
Bureau will retain copyright use of and distribute materials related
to this program is it sees fit.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY2007.
Approximate Total Funding: $3,000,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, the
anticipated program start date will be April 2, 2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: December 31, 2008.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew this grant for two additional fiscal years,
before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by
accredited, post-secondary educational institutions and public and
private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described in
Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost-Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition.
However, the Bureau encourages applicants to provide maximum levels
of cost sharing and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
a. Bureau grant guidelines require that organizations with less
than four years of experience in conducting international exchange
programs will be limited to $60,000 in Bureau funding. ECA anticipates
awarding one grant, in the amount of $3,000,000 to support the program
and administrative costs required to implement the program. Therefore,
applicant organizations with less then four years experience in
conducting international exchange programs are ineligible.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package: Please
contact the Near East, South and Central Asia Branch, Office of
Academic Exchange Programs, ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA, Room 252, U.S. Department
of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, 202-453-
8096, Fax: 202-453-8095 or AlamiLT@state.gov to request a Solicitation
Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/NEA-
SCA-07-01 located at the top of this announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation.
It also contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation
(POGI) document, which provides specific information, award criteria
and budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Program Officer, Laura Alami and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA-07-01 located at the top of
this announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' section
below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please refer to the solicitation package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
[[Page 78258]]
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa: The
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is placing renewed emphasis
on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa)
Programs and adherence by grantees and sponsors to all regulations
governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals should demonstrate the
applicant's capacity to meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR
part 62, including the oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Grantee will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms to
participants in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone: (202) 203-5029,
FAX: (202) 453-8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and physical
challenges. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in program administration and in
program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the `Support
for Diversity' section for specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in
carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries
whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau
``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation. Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee
will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as
well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for: i.e., sustainability, overall
program management, staffing, coordination with ECA and PAS or any
other requirements, etc.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase,
location, or activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
[[Page 78259]]
1. Participant expenses.
2. Administrative costs.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: Thursday, February 15, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA-07-01.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications.
Applications must be shipped no later than the above deadline.
Delivery services used by applicants must have in-place, centralized
shipping identification and tracking systems that may be accessed via
the Internet and delivery people who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or
before the above deadline but received at ECA more than seven days
after the deadline will be ineligible for further consideration under
this competition. Proposals shipped after the established deadlines are
ineligible for consideration under this competition. ECA will not
notify you upon receipt of application. It is each applicant's
responsibility to ensure that each package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the
Internet. Delivery of proposal packages may not be made via local
courier service or in person for this competition. Faxed documents will
not be accepted at any time. Only proposals submitted as stated above
will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and eight (8) copies of the application should be sent
to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA-07-01, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM,
Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the appropriate Public Affairs
Section(s) at the U.S. embassies for their review.
IV.3f.2--Submitting Electronic Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the 'Get Started' portion of the site (http:/
/www.grants.gov/GetStarted).
Several of the steps in the Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore, applicants should check with appropriate
staff within their organizations immediately after reviewing this RFGP
to confirm or determine their registration status with Grants.gov. Once
registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an application
will vary depending on a variety of factors including the size of the
application and the speed of your Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait until the application deadline to
begin the submission process through Grants.gov. Direct all questions
regarding Grants.gov registration and submission to: Grants.gov
Customer Support, Contact Center Phone: 800-518-4726, Business Hours:
Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time, e-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov Web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of the program idea: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission.
2. Ability to achieve program objectives: Detailed agenda and
relevant work plan should demonstrate substantive undertakings and
logistical capacity. Agenda and plan should adhere to the program
overview and guidelines described above. Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Multiplier effect/impact: Proposed programs should strengthen
long-term mutual understanding, including maximum sharing of
information and establishment of long-term institutional and individual
linkages.
4. Support of Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (selection of
participants, program venue and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, program meetings, resource materials
and follow-up activities).
5. Institution's Record/Capacity: Proposals should demonstrate an
[[Page 78260]]
institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grants
Staff. Proposals should demonstrate capacity to place students at
geographically diverse, accredited small colleges and universities that
can provide students personalized attention. The Bureau will consider
the past performance of prior recipients and the demonstrated potential
of new applicants. Proposed personnel and institutional resources
should be adequate and appropriate to achieve the program or project's
goals.
6. Project Evaluation and Follow-on: Proposals should include a
plan to evaluate the activity's success, both as the activities unfold
and at the end of the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to
original project objectives is recommended. Proposals should also
provide a plan for continued follow-on activity (with minimal Bureau
support) ensuring that Bureau supported programs are not isolated
events.
7. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be
kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and
appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the
only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S.
Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and
mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants; https://
exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3 Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one copy of the
following reports:
1. A final program and financial report no more than 90 days after
the expiration of the award;
2. Quarterly program and financial reports that should include
record program activities from that period.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
(Please refer to IV. Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3.d.3)
above for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information).
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
Optional Program Data Requirements: Organizations awarded grants
will be required to maintain specific data on program participants and
activities in an electronically accessible database format that can be
shared with the Bureau as required. As a minimum, the data must include
the following:
(1) Name, address, contact information and biographic sketch of all
persons who travel internationally on funds provided by the grant or
who benefit from the grant funding but do not travel.
(2) Itineraries of international and domestic travel, providing
dates of travel and cities in which any exchange experiences take
place. Final schedules for in-country and U.S. activities must be
received by the ECA Program Officer at least three work days prior to
the official opening of the activity.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Laura Alami, Near
East, South and Central Asia Branch, Office of Academic Exchange
Programs, ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA, Room 252, ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA-07-01, U.S.
Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547,
202-453-8096 and Fax: 202-453-8095, https://www.exchanges.state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the above title and number ECA/A/E/NEA-SCA-07-01. Please read
the complete announcement before sending inquiries or submitting
proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: December 21, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E6-22321 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P