Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals: Study of the United States Institutes for Student Leaders Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement., 78261-78266 [E6-22320]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5657]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals: Study of the United States
Institutes for Student Leaders
Announcement Type: New Cooperative
Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/E/USS–07-SL.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Summer 2007.
Application Deadline: February 16,
2007.
Executive Summary: The Branch for
the Study of the United States, Office of
Academic Exchange Programs, invites
proposal submissions for the design and
implementation of nine Study of the
United States Institutes for Student
Leaders, to take place over the course of
five weeks. While the majority of
Institutes should take place during
Summer 2007, scheduling of each
Institute should take into consideration
the academic calendar of the
participants’ home country(ies). The
Institutes should be similar in structure
and content, take place at U.S. academic
institutions, and provide groups of
highly motivated undergraduate
students from the countries and regions
noted below with an integrated
academic and educational travel
program that will give them a deeper
understanding of U.S. society and
culture, while at the same time
enhancing their leadership skills.
Each Institute will host up to 20
participants, for a total of approximately
180 students. ECA plans to award a
single grant for the administration of
nine Study of the U.S. Institutes. The
awarding of the grant for this program
is contingent upon the availability of
FY–2007 funds.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Authority
Overall grant making authority for
this program is contained in the Mutual
Educational and Cultural Exchange Act
of 1961, Public Law 87–256, as
amended, also known as the FulbrightHays Act. The purpose of the Act is ‘‘to
enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding
between the people of the United States
and the people of other countries * * *;
to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests,
developments, and achievements of the
people of the United States and other
nations * * * and thus to assist in the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
development of friendly, sympathetic
and peaceful relations between the
United States and the other countries of
the world.’’ The funding authority for
the program above is provided through
legislation.
Purpose
Study of the U.S. Institutes for
Student Leaders are intensive academic
programs whose purpose is to provide
groups of undergraduate student leaders
with a deeper understanding of the
United States, while simultaneously
enhancing their leadership skills.
The principal objective of the
Institutes is to heighten the participants’
awareness of the history and evolution
of U.S. society, culture, values and
institutions, broadly defined. In this
context, the Institutes should
incorporate a focus on contemporary
American life, as it is shaped by
historical and/or current political,
social, and economic issues and
debates. The role and influence of
principles and values such as
democracy, the rule of law, individual
rights, freedom of expression, equality,
diversity and tolerance should be
addressed.
In addition to promoting a better
understanding of the United States, an
important objective of the Institutes is to
develop the participants’ leadership and
collective problem-solving skills. In this
context, the academic program should
include group discussions, training and
exercises that focus on such topics as
the essential attributes of leadership,
teambuilding, collective problemsolving skills, effective communication,
and management skills for diverse
organizational settings. There should
also be a community service
component, in which the students
experience firsthand how not-for-profit
organizations and volunteerism play a
key role in American civil society.
Local site visits and educational travel
should provide opportunities to observe
varied aspects of American life and to
discuss lessons learned in the academic
program. The program should also
include opportunities for participants to
meet American citizens from a variety of
backgrounds, to interact with their
American peers, and to speak to
appropriate student and civic groups
about their experiences and life in their
home countries.
Administering Organization
The Bureau is seeking detailed
proposals for the Institutes from public
and private non-profit organizations, or
consortia of such organizations with
expertise in administering academic
exchange programs, which will
PO 00000
Frm 00134
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78261
administer the Institute directly or in
collaboration with partner institutions.
Consortia must designate a lead
institution to receive the grant award.
Organizations that opt to work in subgrant arrangements should clearly
outline all duties and responsibilities of
the partner organization, ideally in the
form of sub-grant agreements and
accompanying budgets.
Each institute should take place on a
U.S. college or university campus. Host
institutions must be selected from
among accredited four-year liberal arts
colleges, community colleges,
universities, other not-for-profit
academic organizations or a consortia of
these institutions that have an
established reputation in one or more of
the following fields: political science,
international relations, law, history,
sociology, American studies, and/or
other disciplines or sub-disciplines
related to the study of the United States.
Organizations or consortia applying
for this grant must demonstrate their (or
their partners’) capacity for conducting
projects of this nature. ECA strongly
prefers that each institution host only
one institute.
Program Design
Each Study of the U.S. Institute for
Student Leaders should provide a group
of up to 20 students with a uniquely
designed program that focuses on U.S.
society and culture. Each Institute will
consist of a challenging academic
program, as well as educational travel to
illustrate the various topics explored in
class.
Each program should be five weeks in
length; participants will spend four
weeks at the host institution for the
academic program, and approximately
one week on the related educational
study tour, including two to three days
in Washington, DC, at the conclusion of
the Institute. The educational travel
component should directly complement
the academic program, and should
include visits to cities and other sites of
interest in the region around the host
institution.
Each Institute should be designed as
an intensive academic program with an
educational travel component that is
organized through a carefully integrated
series of panel presentations, seminar
discussions, debates, individual and
group activities, lectures and reading
assignments, as well as local site visits,
regional educational travel, and
participation in community service
activities.
The Institute must not simply
replicate existing or previous lectures,
workshops, or group activities designed
for American students. Rather, it should
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
78262
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
be a specially designed and wellintegrated seminar that creatively
combines lectures, discussions,
readings, debates, local site visits and
educational travel into a coherent
whole. The grantee institution should
take into account that the participants
may have little or no prior knowledge of
the United States and varying degrees of
experience in expressing their opinions
in a classroom setting; it should tailor
the curriculum and classroom activities
accordingly. Every effort should be
made to encourage active student
participation in all aspects of the
Institute. The program should provide
ample time and opportunity for
discussion and interaction among
students, lecturers and guest speakers,
not simply standard lectures or broad
survey reading assignments. Reading
and writing assignments should be
adjusted to the participants’ familiarity
with English.
Applicants are encouraged to select
accredited four-year liberal arts colleges,
community colleges, universities,
academic organizations or a consortia of
these institutions to design thematically
coherent programs in ways that draw
upon the particular strengths, faculty
and resources of their institutions, as
well as upon the nationally recognized
expertise of scholars and other experts
throughout the United States.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Program Administration
The grantee organization should
designate a project director to oversee
all of the Institutes, coordinate logistical
and administrative arrangements,
ensure an appropriate level of
continuity between the various host
institution programs, and serve as the
principal liaison between ECA and all
the host institutions and thus, ECA’s
primary point of contact.
The grantee organization should also
designate an academic director at each
host institution who will be present
throughout the program to ensure the
continuity, coherence and integration of
all aspects of the academic program,
including the related educational study
tour. In addition to the academic
director, an administrative coordinator
should be assigned at each host
institution to oversee all student
support services, including supervision
of the program participants and
budgetary, logistical, and other
administrative arrangements. For
purposes of this program, it is important
that the grantee organization also retain
qualified mentors or escorts at each host
institution who exhibit cultural
sensitivity, an understanding of the
program’s objectives, and a willingness
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
to accompany the students throughout
the program.
Participants
Participants will be identified and
nominated by the U.S. Embassies,
Consulates and/or Fulbright
Commissions in the participating
countries, with final selection made by
ECA. Each Institute will host up to 20
participants, for a total of approximately
180 students. Participation in the nine
Institutes will be organized by country,
or region, as follows:
(1) Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa.
(2) Argentina, Chile, Uruguay.
(3) Peru, Ecuador, Venezuela.
(4) Brazil.
(5) China.
(6) Turkey.
(7) Bangladesh.
(8) Pakistan.
(9) Pakistan (second institute).
Participants in the Study of the U.S.
Institutes for Student Leaders will be
highly motivated undergraduate
students from colleges, universities and
other institutions of higher education in
selected countries overseas who
demonstrate leadership through
academic work, community
involvement, and extracurricular
activities. Their major fields of study
will be varied, and will include the
sciences, social sciences, humanities,
education and business. All participants
will have a good knowledge of English.
Every effort will be made to select a
balanced mix of male and female
participants, and to recruit participants
who are from non-elite or
underprivileged backgrounds, from both
rural and urban areas, and have had
little or no prior experience in the
United States or elsewhere outside of
their home country.
Program Dates: The Institutes should
be five weeks in length. While the
majority of Institutes should take place
during Summer 2007, scheduling of
each Institute should take into
consideration the academic calendar of
the participants’ home country(ies).
Those institutes beginning in Summer
2007 should begin on or around the
same date.
Program Guidelines: It is essential
that proposals provide a detailed and
comprehensive narrative describing
how the partner organizations and/or
host institutions will achieve the
objectives of the Institutes; the title,
scope and content of each session;
planned site visits, including
educational travel; and how each
session relates to the overall institute
theme.
The proposal must list the institutions
that will host the various programs, and
for which group of students.
PO 00000
Frm 00135
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A sample template should be
provided that lays out the academic
program, including lectures, panel
discussions, group presentations or
other activities. A description of plans
for public and media outreach in
connection with the Institutes should
also be included.
Overall, proposals will be reviewed
on the basis of their responsiveness to
RFGP criteria, coherence, clarity, and
attention to detail.
Please note: In a cooperative agreement,
the Bureau is substantially involved in
program activities above and beyond routine
grant monitoring. The Bureau will assume
the following responsibilities for the
Institutes: participate in the selection of
participants; review and confirm syllabi and
proposed speakers for each of the Institutes;
oversee the Institutes through one or more
site visits; debrief participants in
Washington, DC at the conclusion of the
Institute; work with the cooperating agency
to publicize the program through various
media outlets; provide Bureau-approved
evaluation surveys for completion by
participants; and engage in follow-on
communication with the participants after
they return to their home countries.
The Bureau may request that the
grantee institution make modifications
to the academic residency and/or
educational travel components of the
program. The recipient will be required
to obtain approval of any significant
program changes in advance of their
implementation.
Note: All materials, publicity, and
correspondence related to the program must
acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S.
Department of State. The Bureau will retain
copyright use of and distribute materials
related to this program is it sees fit.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is detailed in the
previous paragraph.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY–2007 (pending
availability of funds).
Approximate Total Funding:
$2,250,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award:
$2,250,000.
Floor of Award Range: $2,000,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $2,250,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, April 1, 2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
May 30, 2008.
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew this grant for two
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
additional fiscal years, before openly
competing it again.
IV.1 Contact Information To Request an
Application Package
III. Eligibility Information
Please contact the Branch for the
Study of the United States, ECA/A/E/
USS, Room 314, U.S. Department of
State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547; tel. (202) 453–
8540; fax (202) 453–8533 to request a
Solicitation Package. Please refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/
E/USS–07–SL located at the top of this
announcement when making your
request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document, which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation. It
also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer
Jennifer Phillips and refer to the
Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/
E/USS–07-SL located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries
and correspondence.
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by
public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions
described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
strongly encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing
and funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs that are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal Government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a) Grants awarded to eligible
organizations with less than four years
of experience in conducting
international exchange programs will be
limited to $60,000. ECA anticipates
awarding one grant in an amount up to
$2,250,000 to support program and
administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may
be downloaded from the Bureau’s Web
site at https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov Web site at https://
www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f,
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF—424 which is
part of the formal application package.
PO 00000
Frm 00136
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
78263
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package. It contains the
mandatory PSI and POGI documents for
additional formatting and technical
requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa. The Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is
placing renewed emphasis on the secure
and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by grantees and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR part 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
The Grantee may be responsible for
issuing DS–2019 forms to participants
in this program, as an alternate
responsible officer under the Bureau’s J
Designation.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, FAX: (202) 453–8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
78264
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ’Support for Diversity’
section (V.2.) for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106—113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation. Monitoring: Proposals must
include a plan to monitor and evaluate
the project’s success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the
program. The Bureau recommends that
your proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
grantee will track participants or
partners and be able to respond to key
monitoring questions, including
satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and
effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work
or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding
as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes. You should also show
how your project objectives link to the
goals of the program described in this
RFGP. Overall, the quality of your
monitoring plan will be judged on how
well it specifies successes and
challenges.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
Evaluation: The Bureau’s Office of
Policy and Evaluation will conduct
evaluations of the Study of the U.S.
Institutes through E–GOALS, its online
system for surveying program
participants and collecting data about
program performance. These
evaluations assist ECA and its program
grantees in meeting the requirements of
the Government Performance Results
Act (GPRA) of 1993. This Act requires
Federal agencies to measure the results
of their programs in meeting predetermined performance goals and
objectives. All program participants will
take three online surveys:
1. Standardized pre-program surveys,
at the beginning of the program;
2. Standardized post-program surveys,
at the end of the program and before
their return home; and
3. Standardized follow-up surveys,
approximately six months to a year after
the conclusion of the program.
These surveys help ECA assess:
Satisfaction with the program; student
attitudes and views; the extent of
learning and skill development
(including leadership); reliance on new
learning and skills in their studies, at
work, and in their communities; and
their efforts to share new ideas,
knowledge, and insights with citizens in
their home countries.
Since organizations play a critical role
in facilitating E–GOALS evaluations of
program participants, it is imperative
that applicants include a plan to ensure
that participants complete the postprogram surveys while they are still on
program and prior to their departure
from the United States; this includes
monitoring the response rate through
collection of a certificate issued by the
system to each student upon completion
of the survey. The grantee will be
working directly with an E-GOALS
evaluator in the Office of Policy and
Evaluation. Please see specific
responsibilities in the accompanying
Project Objectives, Goals and
Implementation (POGI) document.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for
overall program management, staffing,
and coordination with the Bureau. The
Bureau considers these to be essential
elements of your program; please be
sure to give sufficient attention to them
in your proposal.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for the entire
PO 00000
Frm 00137
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
program. Awards may not exceed
$2,250,000. While there is no rigid ratio
of administrative to program costs, the
Bureau urges applicant organizations to
keep administrative costs as low and
reasonable as possible.
There must be a summary budget as
well as breakdowns reflecting both
administrative and program budgets.
Applicants may provide separate subbudgets for each program component,
phase, location, or activity to provide
clarification. Applicants should also
provide copies of any sub-grant
agreements that would be implemented
under terms of this award.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program and additional budget guidance
are outlined in detail in the POGI
document. Please refer to the
Solicitation Package for complete
budget guidelines and formatting
instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission.
Application Deadline Date: February
16, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/USS–
07–SL.
Methods of Submission: Applications
may be submitted in one of two ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed
Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and eight (8) copies of
the application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/USS–07–
SL, Program Management, ECA/EX/PM,
Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk.
The Bureau will provide these files
electronically to regional bureaus and
Public Affairs Sections at U.S.
embassies and for their review, as
appropriate.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ’Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted). Several of the steps in the
Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore,
applicants should check with
appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount
of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of
the application and the speed of your
Internet connection. Therefore, we
strongly recommend that you not wait
until the application deadline to begin
the submission process through
Grants.gov. Direct all questions
regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer
Support, Contact Center Phone: 800
–518–4726, Business Hours: Monday—
Friday, 7 a.m.—9 p.m. Eastern Time, Email: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
78265
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for cooperative
agreements resides with the Bureau’s
Grants Officer.
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(program venue, study tour venue, and
program evaluation) and program
content (orientation and wrap-up
sessions, site visits, program meetings
and resource materials).
4. Evaluation and Follow-On:
Proposals should include a plan to
evaluate the Institute’s success, both as
the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original institute
objectives is strongly recommended.
Proposals should provide a plan for
continued follow-on activity (without
Bureau support) ensuring that Bureau
supported programs are not isolated
events.
5. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
6. Institutional Track Record/Ability:
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants. Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be fully
qualified to achieve the Institute’s goals.
V.2. Review Criteria
VI. Award Administration Information
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of Program Idea/Plan:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission. Detailed agenda
and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings
and logistical capacity.
2. Ability to Achieve Overall Program
Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible.
Proposals should clearly demonstrate
how the institution will meet the
program’s objectives and plan.
3. Support for Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
VI.1. Award Notices
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
PO 00000
Frm 00138
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Final awards cannot be made until
funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed
through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an
Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau’s Grants Office. The
AAD and the original grant proposal
with subsequent modifications (if
applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
78266
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Notices
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy
Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the
Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
Please reference the following Web
sites for additional information: https://
www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants;
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard
copy original plus one (1) copy of the
final program and financial report no
more than 90 days after the expiration
of the award.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. Please refer to
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Jennifer
Phillips, Branch for the Study of the
United States, ECA/A/E/USS, Room
314, U.S. Department of State, SA–44,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547; tel. (202) 453–8537; fax (202)
453–8533; e-mail, PhillipsJA@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:03 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
the title ‘‘Study of the U.S. Institutes for
Student Leaders’’ and number ECA/A/
E/USS–07–SL. Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries
or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may
not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review
process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice:
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–22320 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
—Review of the principles for
establishing the safe manning levels
of ships;
—Education and training requirements
for fatigue prevention, mitigation, and
management;
—Training requirements for the control
and management of ship’s ballast
water and sediments; and
—Development of competences for
ratings.
Please note that hard copies of
documents associated with STW 38 will
not be available at this meeting, the
documents will be available at the
meeting in portable document format
(.pdf) on CD–ROM. To request
documents before the meeting please
write to the address provided below,
and include your name, address, phone
number, and electronic mail address.
Copies of the papers will be sent via
electronic mail to the address provided.
Members of the public may attend the
meeting up to the seating capacity of the
room. Interested persons may seek
information by writing: Luke Harden,
U.S. Coast Guard (G–PSO–1), Room
1210, 2100 Second Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20593–0001 or by
calling; (202) 372–1408.
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Michael Tousley,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating
Committee, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 06–9894 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–09–P
[Public Notice 5627]
Shipping Coordinating Committee;
Notice of Meeting
The Shipping Coordinating
Committee (SHC) through the
Subcommittee on Standards of Training,
Certification and Watchkeeping will
conduct an open meeting at 9:30 a.m. on
January 10, 2007. The meeting will be
held in Room 1420 of Jemal’s Riverside
Building, 1900 Half Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20593. The purpose of
the meeting is to prepare for the 38th
session of the International Maritime
Organization (IMO) Sub-Committee on
Standards of Training and
Watchkeeping (STW 38) to be held on
January 22–26, 2007, at the Royal
Horticultural Halls and Conference
Centre in London, England.
The primary matters to be considered
include:
—Comprehensive review of the STCW
Convention and the STCW Code;
—Measures to enhance maritime
security;
—Unlawful practices associated with
certificates of competency;
—Large passenger ship safety;
PO 00000
Frm 00139
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Office of the Secretary
Aviation Proceedings, Agreements
Filed the Week Ending December 15,
2006
The following Agreements were filed
with the Department of Transportation
under the Sections 412 and 414 of the
Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49
U.S.C. 1383 and 1384) and procedures
goving proceeding to enforce these
provisions. Answers may be filed within
21 days after the filing of the
application.
Docket Number: OST–2006–26628.
Date Filed: December 15, 2006.
Parties Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject TC31 North & Central Pacific
Areawide Resolutions (Memo 0389).
Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.
Docket Number: OST–2006–26630.
Date Filed: December 15, 2006.
Parties: Members of the International
Air Transport Association.
Subject: TC31 North & Central JapanNorth America, Caribbean, Resolutions
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78261-78266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22320]
[[Page 78261]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5657]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals: Study of the United States Institutes for Student
Leaders Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/E/USS-07-SL.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Summer 2007.
Application Deadline: February 16, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Branch for the Study of the United States,
Office of Academic Exchange Programs, invites proposal submissions for
the design and implementation of nine Study of the United States
Institutes for Student Leaders, to take place over the course of five
weeks. While the majority of Institutes should take place during Summer
2007, scheduling of each Institute should take into consideration the
academic calendar of the participants' home country(ies). The
Institutes should be similar in structure and content, take place at
U.S. academic institutions, and provide groups of highly motivated
undergraduate students from the countries and regions noted below with
an integrated academic and educational travel program that will give
them a deeper understanding of U.S. society and culture, while at the
same time enhancing their leadership skills.
Each Institute will host up to 20 participants, for a total of
approximately 180 students. ECA plans to award a single grant for the
administration of nine Study of the U.S. Institutes. The awarding of
the grant for this program is contingent upon the availability of FY-
2007 funds.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority
Overall grant making authority for this program is contained in the
Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87-
256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of
the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United States to increase
mutual understanding between the people of the United States and the
people of other countries * * *; to strengthen the ties which unite us
with other nations by demonstrating the educational and cultural
interests, developments, and achievements of the people of the United
States and other nations * * * and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful relations between the United States
and the other countries of the world.'' The funding authority for the
program above is provided through legislation.
Purpose
Study of the U.S. Institutes for Student Leaders are intensive
academic programs whose purpose is to provide groups of undergraduate
student leaders with a deeper understanding of the United States, while
simultaneously enhancing their leadership skills.
The principal objective of the Institutes is to heighten the
participants' awareness of the history and evolution of U.S. society,
culture, values and institutions, broadly defined. In this context, the
Institutes should incorporate a focus on contemporary American life, as
it is shaped by historical and/or current political, social, and
economic issues and debates. The role and influence of principles and
values such as democracy, the rule of law, individual rights, freedom
of expression, equality, diversity and tolerance should be addressed.
In addition to promoting a better understanding of the United
States, an important objective of the Institutes is to develop the
participants' leadership and collective problem-solving skills. In this
context, the academic program should include group discussions,
training and exercises that focus on such topics as the essential
attributes of leadership, teambuilding, collective problem-solving
skills, effective communication, and management skills for diverse
organizational settings. There should also be a community service
component, in which the students experience firsthand how not-for-
profit organizations and volunteerism play a key role in American civil
society.
Local site visits and educational travel should provide
opportunities to observe varied aspects of American life and to discuss
lessons learned in the academic program. The program should also
include opportunities for participants to meet American citizens from a
variety of backgrounds, to interact with their American peers, and to
speak to appropriate student and civic groups about their experiences
and life in their home countries.
Administering Organization
The Bureau is seeking detailed proposals for the Institutes from
public and private non-profit organizations, or consortia of such
organizations with expertise in administering academic exchange
programs, which will administer the Institute directly or in
collaboration with partner institutions. Consortia must designate a
lead institution to receive the grant award. Organizations that opt to
work in sub-grant arrangements should clearly outline all duties and
responsibilities of the partner organization, ideally in the form of
sub-grant agreements and accompanying budgets.
Each institute should take place on a U.S. college or university
campus. Host institutions must be selected from among accredited four-
year liberal arts colleges, community colleges, universities, other
not-for-profit academic organizations or a consortia of these
institutions that have an established reputation in one or more of the
following fields: political science, international relations, law,
history, sociology, American studies, and/or other disciplines or sub-
disciplines related to the study of the United States.
Organizations or consortia applying for this grant must demonstrate
their (or their partners') capacity for conducting projects of this
nature. ECA strongly prefers that each institution host only one
institute.
Program Design
Each Study of the U.S. Institute for Student Leaders should provide
a group of up to 20 students with a uniquely designed program that
focuses on U.S. society and culture. Each Institute will consist of a
challenging academic program, as well as educational travel to
illustrate the various topics explored in class.
Each program should be five weeks in length; participants will
spend four weeks at the host institution for the academic program, and
approximately one week on the related educational study tour, including
two to three days in Washington, DC, at the conclusion of the
Institute. The educational travel component should directly complement
the academic program, and should include visits to cities and other
sites of interest in the region around the host institution.
Each Institute should be designed as an intensive academic program
with an educational travel component that is organized through a
carefully integrated series of panel presentations, seminar
discussions, debates, individual and group activities, lectures and
reading assignments, as well as local site visits, regional educational
travel, and participation in community service activities.
The Institute must not simply replicate existing or previous
lectures, workshops, or group activities designed for American
students. Rather, it should
[[Page 78262]]
be a specially designed and well-integrated seminar that creatively
combines lectures, discussions, readings, debates, local site visits
and educational travel into a coherent whole. The grantee institution
should take into account that the participants may have little or no
prior knowledge of the United States and varying degrees of experience
in expressing their opinions in a classroom setting; it should tailor
the curriculum and classroom activities accordingly. Every effort
should be made to encourage active student participation in all aspects
of the Institute. The program should provide ample time and opportunity
for discussion and interaction among students, lecturers and guest
speakers, not simply standard lectures or broad survey reading
assignments. Reading and writing assignments should be adjusted to the
participants' familiarity with English.
Applicants are encouraged to select accredited four-year liberal
arts colleges, community colleges, universities, academic organizations
or a consortia of these institutions to design thematically coherent
programs in ways that draw upon the particular strengths, faculty and
resources of their institutions, as well as upon the nationally
recognized expertise of scholars and other experts throughout the
United States.
Program Administration
The grantee organization should designate a project director to
oversee all of the Institutes, coordinate logistical and administrative
arrangements, ensure an appropriate level of continuity between the
various host institution programs, and serve as the principal liaison
between ECA and all the host institutions and thus, ECA's primary point
of contact.
The grantee organization should also designate an academic director
at each host institution who will be present throughout the program to
ensure the continuity, coherence and integration of all aspects of the
academic program, including the related educational study tour. In
addition to the academic director, an administrative coordinator should
be assigned at each host institution to oversee all student support
services, including supervision of the program participants and
budgetary, logistical, and other administrative arrangements. For
purposes of this program, it is important that the grantee organization
also retain qualified mentors or escorts at each host institution who
exhibit cultural sensitivity, an understanding of the program's
objectives, and a willingness to accompany the students throughout the
program.
Participants
Participants will be identified and nominated by the U.S.
Embassies, Consulates and/or Fulbright Commissions in the participating
countries, with final selection made by ECA. Each Institute will host
up to 20 participants, for a total of approximately 180 students.
Participation in the nine Institutes will be organized by country, or
region, as follows:
(1) Nigeria, Kenya, South Africa.
(2) Argentina, Chile, Uruguay.
(3) Peru, Ecuador, Venezuela.
(4) Brazil.
(5) China.
(6) Turkey.
(7) Bangladesh.
(8) Pakistan.
(9) Pakistan (second institute).
Participants in the Study of the U.S. Institutes for Student
Leaders will be highly motivated undergraduate students from colleges,
universities and other institutions of higher education in selected
countries overseas who demonstrate leadership through academic work,
community involvement, and extracurricular activities. Their major
fields of study will be varied, and will include the sciences, social
sciences, humanities, education and business. All participants will
have a good knowledge of English.
Every effort will be made to select a balanced mix of male and
female participants, and to recruit participants who are from non-elite
or underprivileged backgrounds, from both rural and urban areas, and
have had little or no prior experience in the United States or
elsewhere outside of their home country.
Program Dates: The Institutes should be five weeks in length. While
the majority of Institutes should take place during Summer 2007,
scheduling of each Institute should take into consideration the
academic calendar of the participants' home country(ies). Those
institutes beginning in Summer 2007 should begin on or around the same
date.
Program Guidelines: It is essential that proposals provide a
detailed and comprehensive narrative describing how the partner
organizations and/or host institutions will achieve the objectives of
the Institutes; the title, scope and content of each session; planned
site visits, including educational travel; and how each session relates
to the overall institute theme.
The proposal must list the institutions that will host the various
programs, and for which group of students.
A sample template should be provided that lays out the academic
program, including lectures, panel discussions, group presentations or
other activities. A description of plans for public and media outreach
in connection with the Institutes should also be included.
Overall, proposals will be reviewed on the basis of their
responsiveness to RFGP criteria, coherence, clarity, and attention to
detail.
Please note: In a cooperative agreement, the Bureau is
substantially involved in program activities above and beyond
routine grant monitoring. The Bureau will assume the following
responsibilities for the Institutes: participate in the selection of
participants; review and confirm syllabi and proposed speakers for
each of the Institutes; oversee the Institutes through one or more
site visits; debrief participants in Washington, DC at the
conclusion of the Institute; work with the cooperating agency to
publicize the program through various media outlets; provide Bureau-
approved evaluation surveys for completion by participants; and
engage in follow-on communication with the participants after they
return to their home countries.
The Bureau may request that the grantee institution make
modifications to the academic residency and/or educational travel
components of the program. The recipient will be required to obtain
approval of any significant program changes in advance of their
implementation.
Note: All materials, publicity, and correspondence related to
the program must acknowledge this as a program of the Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, U.S. Department of State. The
Bureau will retain copyright use of and distribute materials related
to this program is it sees fit.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is detailed in the previous paragraph.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY-2007 (pending availability of funds).
Approximate Total Funding: $2,250,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 1.
Approximate Average Award: $2,250,000.
Floor of Award Range: $2,000,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $2,250,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, April 1,
2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: May 30, 2008.
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew this grant for two
[[Page 78263]]
additional fiscal years, before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible Applicants
Applications may be submitted by public and private non-profit
organizations meeting the provisions described in Internal Revenue Code
section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds
There is no minimum or maximum percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau strongly encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in support of its
programs. When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed
that the applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as
stipulated in its proposal and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or
indirect costs. For accountability, you must maintain written records
to support all costs that are claimed as your contribution, as well as
costs to be paid by the Federal Government. Such records are subject to
audit. The basis for determining the value of cash and in-kind
contributions must be in accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised),
Subpart C.23--Cost Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the
approved budget, ECA's contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements
(a) Grants awarded to eligible organizations with less than four
years of experience in conducting international exchange programs will
be limited to $60,000. ECA anticipates awarding one grant in an amount
up to $2,250,000 to support program and administrative costs required
to implement this exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this competition.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information To Request an Application Package
Please contact the Branch for the Study of the United States, ECA/
A/E/USS, Room 314, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street,
SW., Washington, DC 20547; tel. (202) 453-8540; fax (202) 453-8533 to
request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/A/E/USS-07-SL located at the top of this announcement when
making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document, which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. It also
contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific information, award criteria and
budget instructions tailored to this competition.
Please specify Bureau Program Officer Jennifer Phillips and refer
to the Funding Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/USS-07-SL located at the top
of this announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet
The entire Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's
Web site at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or
from the Grants.gov Web site at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission
Applicants must follow all instructions in the Solicitation
Package. The application should be submitted per the instructions under
IV.3f, ``Application Deadline and Methods of Submission'' below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF--424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget. Please refer to the Solicitation Package. It
contains the mandatory PSI and POGI documents for additional formatting
and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa. The
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is placing renewed emphasis
on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa)
Programs and adherence by grantees and sponsors to all regulations
governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals should demonstrate the
applicant's capacity to meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR
part 62, including the oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
The Grantee may be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms to
participants in this program, as an alternate responsible officer under
the Bureau's J Designation.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44, Room 734,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone: (202) 203-5029,
FAX: (202) 453-8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural
[[Page 78264]]
life. ``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and
encompass differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race,
gender, religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and
disabilities. Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in program administration and in
program content. Please refer to the review criteria under the 'Support
for Diversity' section (V.2.) for specific suggestions on incorporating
diversity into your proposal. Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in
carrying out programs of educational and cultural exchange in countries
whose people do not fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau
``shall take appropriate steps to provide opportunities for
participation in such programs to human rights and democracy leaders of
such countries.'' Public Law 106--113 requires that the governments of
the countries described above do not have inappropriate influence in
the selection process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these
goals in their program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation. Monitoring: Proposals
must include a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both
as the activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau
recommends that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or
other technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link
outcomes to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the
grantee will track participants or partners and be able to respond to
key monitoring questions, including satisfaction with the program,
learning as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of
the program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions
in which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that measure gains in mutual
understanding as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP. Overall, the
quality of your monitoring plan will be judged on how well it specifies
successes and challenges.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
Evaluation: The Bureau's Office of Policy and Evaluation will
conduct evaluations of the Study of the U.S. Institutes through E-
GOALS, its online system for surveying program participants and
collecting data about program performance. These evaluations assist ECA
and its program grantees in meeting the requirements of the Government
Performance Results Act (GPRA) of 1993. This Act requires Federal
agencies to measure the results of their programs in meeting pre-
determined performance goals and objectives. All program participants
will take three online surveys:
1. Standardized pre-program surveys, at the beginning of the
program;
2. Standardized post-program surveys, at the end of the program and
before their return home; and
3. Standardized follow-up surveys, approximately six months to a
year after the conclusion of the program.
These surveys help ECA assess: Satisfaction with the program;
student attitudes and views; the extent of learning and skill
development (including leadership); reliance on new learning and skills
in their studies, at work, and in their communities; and their efforts
to share new ideas, knowledge, and insights with citizens in their home
countries.
Since organizations play a critical role in facilitating E-GOALS
evaluations of program participants, it is imperative that applicants
include a plan to ensure that participants complete the post-program
surveys while they are still on program and prior to their departure
from the United States; this includes monitoring the response rate
through collection of a certificate issued by the system to each
student upon completion of the survey. The grantee will be working
directly with an E-GOALS evaluator in the Office of Policy and
Evaluation. Please see specific responsibilities in the accompanying
Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for overall program management,
staffing, and coordination with the Bureau. The Bureau considers these
to be essential elements of your program; please be sure to give
sufficient attention to them in your proposal.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. Awards may not exceed $2,250,000. While there is no
rigid ratio of administrative to program costs, the Bureau urges
applicant organizations to keep administrative costs as low and
reasonable as possible.
There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase, location, or
activity to provide clarification. Applicants should also provide
copies of any sub-grant agreements that would be implemented under
terms of this award.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program and additional budget
guidance are outlined in detail in the POGI document. Please refer to
the Solicitation Package for complete budget guidelines and formatting
instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission.
Application Deadline Date: February 16, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/USS-07-SL.
Methods of Submission: Applications may be submitted in one of two
ways:
(1) In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
(2) electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1 Submitting Printed Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not
[[Page 78265]]
be made via local courier service or in person for this competition.
Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time. Only proposals
submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and eight (8) copies of the application should be sent
to: U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Reference Number: ECA/A/E/USS-07-SL, Program Management, ECA/
EX/PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547.
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to regional bureaus and Public
Affairs Sections at U.S. embassies and for their review, as
appropriate.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the 'Get Started' portion of the site (http:/
/www.grants.gov/GetStarted). Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several weeks. Therefore, applicants
should check with appropriate staff within their organizations
immediately after reviewing this RFGP to confirm or determine their
registration status with Grants.gov. Once registered, the amount of
time it can take to upload an application will vary depending on a
variety of factors including the size of the application and the speed
of your Internet connection. Therefore, we strongly recommend that you
not wait until the application deadline to begin the submission process
through Grants.gov. Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov
registration and submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support, Contact
Center Phone: 800 -518-4726, Business Hours: Monday--Friday, 7 a.m.--9
p.m. Eastern Time, E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's Grants Officer.
V.2. Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of Program Idea/Plan: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission. Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical capacity.
2. Ability to Achieve Overall Program Objectives: Objectives should
be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Support for Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (program venue,
study tour venue, and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, site visits, program meetings and
resource materials).
4. Evaluation and Follow-On: Proposals should include a plan to
evaluate the Institute's success, both as the activities unfold and at
the end of the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique
plus description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
institute objectives is strongly recommended. Proposals should provide
a plan for continued follow-on activity (without Bureau support)
ensuring that Bureau supported programs are not isolated events.
5. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be
kept as low as possible. All other items should be necessary and
appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-sharing through other
private sector support as well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
6. Institutional Track Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate
an institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grants
Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior
recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants. Proposed
personnel and institutional resources should be fully qualified to
achieve the Institute's goals.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1. Award Notices
Final awards cannot be made until funds have been appropriated by
Congress, allocated and committed through internal Bureau procedures.
Successful applicants will receive an Assistance Award Document (AAD)
from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable) shall be the
only binding authorizing document between the recipient and the U.S.
Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants Officer, and
mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified in the
application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA
[[Page 78266]]
program office coordinating this competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements
Terms and Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements
include the following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations
Please reference the following Web sites for additional
information: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants; https://
exchanges.state.gov/education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements
You must provide ECA with a hard copy original plus one (1) copy of
the final program and financial report no more than 90 days after the
expiration of the award.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
Please refer to Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3d.3) above
for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Jennifer Phillips,
Branch for the Study of the United States, ECA/A/E/USS, Room 314, U.S.
Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547;
tel. (202) 453-8537; fax (202) 453-8533; e-mail, PhillipsJA@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the title ``Study of the U.S. Institutes for Student
Leaders'' and number ECA/A/E/USS-07-SL. Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the
RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice:
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E6-22320 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-07-P