Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona; Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs, 78115-78123 [E6-22305]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
pocket costs under the MA–PD plan
may be submitted for CHAMPUS/
TRICARE payment. However, consistent
with paragraph (c)(4) of this section,
out-of-pocket costs do not include costs
associated with unauthorized out-ofsystem care or care otherwise obtained
under circumstances that result in a
denial or limitation of coverage for care
that would have been covered or fully
covered had the beneficiary met
applicable requirements and
procedures. In such cases, the
CHAMPUS/TRICARE amount payable is
limited to the amount that would have
been paid if the beneficiary had
received care covered by the Medicare
Advantage plan. If the TRICAREMedicare beneficiary enrolls in a MA–
PD drug plan, it will be governed by
Medicare Part C, although plans that
offer a prescription drug benefit also
must comply with Medicare Part D
rules. The beneficiary has to pay the
plan’s monthly premiums and obtain all
medical care and prescription drugs
through the Medicare Advantage plan
before seeking CHAMPUS/TRICARE
payment. CHAMPUS/TRICARE
payment for such beneficiaries may not
exceed that which would be payable for
a beneficiary under paragraph
(d)(1)(iii)(C) of this section.
3. Section 199.21 is amended by
adding new paragraphs (g)(4) and
(i)(2)(xi), and by revising paragraphs
(h)(2)(ii) and (m), to read as follows:
§ 199.21
Pharmacy benefits program.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(4) Transition to the uniform
formulary. Beginning in Fiscal Year
2005, under an updated charter for the
DoD P&T Committee, the committee
shall meet at least quarterly to review
therapeutic classes of pharmaceutical
agents and make recommendations
concerning which pharmaceutical
agents should be on the Uniform
Formulary, Basic Core Formulary, and
Extended Core Formulary. The P&T
Committee will review the classes in a
methodical, but expeditious manner.
During the transition period from the
previous methodology of formulary
management involving only the MTFs
and the TRICARE Mail Order Pharmacy
Program, previous decisions by the
predecessor DoD P&T Committee
concerning MTF and Mail Order
Pharmacy Program formularies shall
continue in effect. As therapeutic
classes are reviewed under the new
formulary management process, the
processes established by this section
shall apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
(2) * * *
(ii) Availability of formulary
pharmaceutical agents at military
treatment facilities. Pharmaceutical
agents included on the uniform
formulary are available through
facilities of uniformed services,
consistent with the scope of health care
services offered in such facilities and
additional determinations by the
Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee
of the relative clinical effectiveness and
cost effectiveness, based on costs to the
Program associated with providing the
agents to beneficiaries. The Basic Core
Formulary (BCF) is a subset of the
uniform formulary and is a mandatory
component of formularies at all fullservice MTF pharmacies. The BCF
contains the minimum set of
pharmaceutical agents that each fullservice MTF pharmacy must have on its
formulary to support the primary care
scope of practice for Primary Care
Manager enrollment sites. Limitedservice MTF pharmacies (e.g., specialty
pharmacies within an MTF or
pharmacies servicing only active duty
military members) are not required to
include the entire BCF on their
formularies, but may limit their
formularies to those BCF agents
appropriate to the needs of the patients
they serve. An Extended Core
Formulary (ECF) may list preferred
agents in drug classes other than those
covered by the BCF. Among BCF and
ECF agents, individual MTF formularies
are determined by local Pharmacy and
Therapeutics Committees based on the
scope of health care services provided at
the respective MTFs. All
pharmaceutical agents on the local
formulary of full-service MTF
pharmacies must be available to all
categories of beneficiaries.
*
*
*
*
*
(i) * * *
(2) * * *
(xi) For a Medicare-eligible
beneficiary, the cost sharing
requirements may not be in excess of
the cost-sharing requirements applicable
to all other beneficiaries covered by 10
U.S.C. 1086.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Effect of other health insurance.
The double coverage rules of section
199.8 of this part are applicable to
services provided under the pharmacy
benefits program. For this purpose, the
Medicare prescription drug benefit
under Medicare Part D, prescription
drug benefits provided under Medicare
Part D plans are double coverage plans
and such plans will be the primary
payer, to the extent described in section
199.8 of this part. Beneficiaries who
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78115
elect to use these pharmacy benefits
shall provide DoD with other health
insurance information.
Dated: December 21, 2006.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. E6–22258 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2005–AZ–0009; FRL–8262–
5]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Arizona; Motor
Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance
Programs
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
two revisions to the Arizona State
Implementation Plan submitted by the
Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality. These revisions consist of
changes to Arizona’s Basic and
Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection
Programs that would exempt collectible
vehicles in the Phoenix metropolitan
area, and collectible vehicles and
motorcycles in the Tucson metropolitan
area, from emissions testing
requirements; an updated performance
standard evaluation for the vehicle
emissions inspection program in the
Phoenix area; and new contingency
measures. EPA is proposing approval of
these two state implementation plan
revisions because they meet all
applicable requirements of the Clean Air
Act and EPA’s regulations and because
the exemptions would not interfere with
attainment or maintenance of the
national ambient air quality standards
in the two affected areas. EPA is
proposing this action under the Clean
Air Act obligation to take action on
State submittals of revisions to state
implementation plans. The intended
effect is to exempt these vehicle
categories from the emissions testing
requirements of the State’s vehicle
emissions inspection programs as
approved for the Phoenix and Tucson
areas.
Written comments must be
received at the address below on or
before January 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
78116
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
OAR–2005–AZ–0009 by one of the
following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
E-mail: tax.wienke@epa.gov.
Fax: (415) 947–3579 (please alert the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing
comments).
Mail: Wienke Tax, Office of Air
Planning, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR–
2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901.
Hand Delivery: Wienke Tax, Office of
Air Planning, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR–
2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901. Such deliveries
are only accepted Monday through
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:55 p.m., excluding
federal holidays. Special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2005–
AZ–0009. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at
https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA, without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Office of Air Planning,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR–2, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105–3901. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view
the hard copy of the docket. You may
view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 9, (520) 622–1622, e-mail:
tax.wienke@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the terms
‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Introduction and Background
II. Summary of Arizona’s SIP Submittals
III. EPA Review of the SIP Revisions
A. CAA Procedural Provisions
B. I/M Program Requirements
1. Vehicle Coverage and Exemptions
2. Compliance Enforcement
3. Performance Evaluation
C. Demonstrating Noninterference With
Attainment and Maintenance Under
CAA Section 110(l)
1. Ozone
2. Carbon Monoxide
3. Particulate Matter
4. Air Toxics
5. Conclusion
D. Contingency Provisions of CAA Section
175A(d)
IV. EPA’s Proposed Action and Request For
Public Comment
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Introduction and Background
In May 1995, EPA approved Arizona’s
Basic and Enhanced Vehicle Emissions
Inspection/Maintenance (VEI) Programs
as meeting the applicable requirements
of the Clean Air Act, as amended in
1990 (CAA or ‘‘Act’’) and EPA’s motor
vehicle inspection and maintenance
rule (‘‘EPA’s I/M rule’’ or ‘‘federal I/M
rule’’) as amended. See 60 FR 22518
(May 8, 1995). A ‘‘basic’’ I/M program
was required in the Tucson Air
Planning Area carbon monoxide (CO)
nonattainment area (referred to by
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Arizona in this context as ‘‘Area B’’) and
in the Phoenix metropolitan CO and
ozone nonattainment area (referred to as
‘‘Area A’’). The VEI programs were
designed to reduce emissions of CO,
volatile organic compounds (VOC) and
oxides of nitrogen (NOX).1 At that time,
Arizona was not required to have an
‘‘enhanced’’ I/M program, although
Arizona was implementing most
elements of an enhanced program in
Phoenix. Arizona’s program, as
implemented in Phoenix, however, was
not approved as an enhanced program,
because the program did not satisfy all
the requirements in EPA’s I/M rule for
enhanced programs. An enhanced I/M
program became a requirement for the
Phoenix area when the area was
reclassified from ‘‘moderate’’
nonattainment to ‘‘serious’’
nonattainment for the CO NAAQS
effective August 28, 1996 (61 FR 39343,
July 29, 1996), and when the area was
reclassified from ‘‘moderate’’
nonattainment to ‘‘serious’’
nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS effective February 13, 1998 (63
FR 7290, February 13, 1998).
Since the Arizona VEI programs were
originally approved in May 1995, EPA
has amended the federal I/M rule
several times to provide states with
more flexibility in designing their
programs but also to require testing of
the on-board diagnostic (OBD) system.
Since that time, Arizona has also made
a number of changes to its enhanced
and basic VEI programs.
In January 2003, we approved changes
to the Arizona VEI programs submitted
to us on July 6, 2001 and April 10, 2002,
including the incorporation of OBD
testing, an exemption for the first five
model year vehicles from the programs
on a rolling basis, replacement of the
previously-approved remote sensing
program in Phoenix with an on-road
testing study, and legislative changes to
the waiver provisions. See 68 FR 2912
(January 22, 2003). In our January 2003
final rule, we also approved the VEI
program in the Phoenix area as meeting
the enhanced I/M program performance
standard. In today’s notice, we propose
action on a statutory change made by
the Arizona Legislature to the Arizona
VEI programs to exempt certain
categories of vehicles from emissions
testing requirements.
1 The Phoenix metropolitan area is also a
nonattainment area for respirable particulate matter
(PM10); however, the VEI program plays a very
minor role in the control strategy for this pollutant.
There is no CAA requirement for I/M programs in
PM10 nonattainment areas.
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
II. Summary of Arizona’s SIP
Submittals
The Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality (ADEQ)
submitted the most recent statutory
changes to its Basic and Enhanced VEI
Programs as a revision to the Arizona
State Implementation Plan (SIP) on
December 23, 2005 (‘‘VEI SIP
Revision’’). The VEI SIP Revision
submittal includes the SIP revision
itself, divided into a non-regulatory
portion, ‘‘Final Arizona State
Implementation Plan Revision, Basic
and Enhanced Vehicle Emissions
Inspection/Maintenance Programs’’
(December 2005), and a regulatory
portion, House Bill (HB) 2357, as well
as supporting materials related to legal
authority, adoption, public process and
technical analysis.
HB 2357 amends the Arizona Revised
Statutes (ARS) Section 49–542 by
exempting vehicles that are at least 15
years old or are of a unique and rare
design and that carry collectible vehicle
insurance that restricts the mileage and/
or use of the vehicle (‘‘collectible
vehicles’’) from emissions testing in
both Area A (i.e., the Phoenix area) and
Area B (i.e., the Tucson area). In
addition, HB 2357 exempts motorcycles
in the Tucson area from emissions
testing. Specifically, the amendments to
ARS 49–542 are found in paragraphs or
subparagraphs (J)(2)(k), (J)(2)(l), (Y), and
(Z) of that section of code. The changes
to ARS Section 49–542 are selfimplementing, which means that they
become effective upon EPA approval as
a revision to the Arizona SIP.
Among the technical materials
included in the VEI SIP Revision
submittal package is a report 2 prepared
by ADEQ that evaluates the impacts of
exempting three vehicle categories
(vehicles 25 model years old and older,
motorcycles, and collectible vehicles)
from the emissions testing requirements
on ambient air quality and on the ability
of Areas A and B (i.e., Phoenix and
Tucson, respectively) to maintain or
attain the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). The report
concluded that the testing and repair of
these vehicle categories as a whole does
provide a significant air quality benefit.
The analysis, however, also identified a
subset of vehicle categories (collectible
vehicles in Phoenix and Tucson plus
motorcycles in Tucson) for which the
emissions testing requirement does not
provide a significant air quality benefit
and for which exemption would not
2 ‘‘Report on Potential Exemptions from Vehicle
Emissions Testing for Motorcycles, Collectible
Vehicles, and Vehicles 25 Model Years Old and
Older’’ (December 2004).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
interfere with continued maintenance of
the CO NAAQS or progress towards the
8-hour ozone NAAQS. HB 2357 was a
Legislative response to the findings in
this report.
In consultation with EPA concerning
the VEI SIP Revision, ADEQ prepared
an updated performance standard
evaluation for the VEI program in the
Phoenix area to reflect the new
exemption for collectible vehicles, and
developed new contingency measures
that are intended to provide for
reinstatement of emissions testing for
the newly exempt vehicle categories in
the event that a violation of the carbon
monoxide NAAQS were to be recorded
in the Phoenix or Tucson areas. On
October 3, 2006, ADEQ adopted and
submitted the updated performance
standard evaluation and new
contingency measures in a
supplemental SIP revision, entitled,
‘‘Supplement to Final Arizona State
Implementation Plan Revision, Basic
and Enhanced Vehicle Emissions
Inspection/Maintenance Programs,
December 2005’’ (September 2006)
(‘‘VEI SIP Supplement’’). As part of the
submittal of the VEI SIP Supplement,
ADEQ documented the public
participation process that was
conducted by ADEQ prior to adoption
and submittal to EPA.
III. EPA Review of the SIP Revisions
A. CAA Procedural Provisions
CAA section 110(l) requires revisions
to a SIP to be adopted by the state after
reasonable notice and public hearing.
EPA has promulgated specific
requirements for SIP revisions in 40
CFR part 51, subpart F.
On October 20 and 21, 2005, ADEQ
published notices in newspapers of
general circulation in the Phoenix and
Tucson areas of public hearings on
proposed revisions to the Arizona SIP to
exempt collectible vehicles in Phoenix
and collectible vehicles and motorcycles
in Tucson from emissions testing
requirements under the Arizona VEI
programs (i.e., a draft VEI SIP Revision).
Public hearings were held on November
28, 2005 in Phoenix and November 30,
2005 in Tucson. On December 23, 2005,
in accordance with Arizona law, ADEQ
adopted these exemptions as set forth in
‘‘Final Arizona State Implementation
Plan Revision, Basic and Enhanced
Vehicle Emissions Inspection/
Maintenance Programs’’ (December
2005) as a revision to the Arizona SIP
and submitted the revision to EPA for
approval.
ADEQ followed a similar process in
adopting and submitting the VEI SIP
Supplement. ADEQ held a public
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78117
hearing in Tucson on August 30, 2006
and in Phoenix on August 31, 2006 on
a draft VEI SIP Supplement and adopted
the VEI SIP Supplement on October 3,
2006 in accordance with Arizona law
prior to submittal to EPA as a revision
to the Arizona SIP.
ADEQ’s VEI SIP Revision and VEI SIP
Supplement submittal packages include
evidence of public notice and hearing,
ADEQ responses to public comments,
and ADEQ adoption as described above,
and, based on review of these materials,
we find that ADEQ has met the
procedural requirements of CAA section
110(l) and 40 CFR part 51, subpart F.
B. I/M Program Requirements
As noted in Section I, Introduction
and Background, herein, Arizona’s VEI
programs were most recently approved
as meeting federal I/M program
requirements on January 22, 2003 (68
FR 2912). Although the Phoenix and
Tucson areas have been redesignated to
‘‘attainment’’ for the CO NAAQS, the
VEI programs continue to be relied upon
to maintain the CO standard in those
areas. Moreover, ‘‘enhanced’’ I/M
remains an ‘‘applicable requirement’’ for
the Phoenix area under our final rule
implementing the 8-hour ozone NAAQS
(see 40 CFR 51.900(f) and 51.905(a)(1))
based on the designation of that area as
a nonattainment area for the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS (and designation as
nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS at the time of designation for
the 8-hour standard). Thus, to be
approved, the VEI programs, as
amended and evaluated herein, must
continue to meet the relevant
enforceability requirements for I/M
programs in subpart S of 40 CFR part 51
and, for the Phoenix area with respect
to ozone, the enhanced performance
standard in 40 CFR 51.351. In the
following paragraphs, we review
ADEQ’s VEI SIP Revision and VEI SIP
Supplement to determine whether the
amended VEI programs continue to
meet federal I/M program requirements.
The aspects of I/M affected by the
submitted revisions to the VEI programs
include vehicle coverage and
exemptions, compliance enforcement,
and the performance standard
evaluation.
1. Vehicle Coverage and Exemptions
The performance standard for
enhanced I/M programs (including
alternate low enhanced programs)
assumes coverage of all 1968 and later
model year light duty vehicles and
trucks. Light duty trucks are not
included in the performance standard
for basic I/M programs. Other levels of
coverage may be approved if the
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
78118
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
necessary emission reductions are
achieved. See 40 CFR 51.356.
The Arizona VEI programs approved
by EPA in 1995 exempt several
categories of vehicles from the
emissions testing requirements. Such
vehicle categories included, among
others, vehicles manufactured in or
before the 1966 model year and vehicles
being sold between motor vehicle
dealers. See 60 FR 22518, 22521 (May
8, 1995). In 2003, we approved revisions
to the VEI programs including an
exemption for the first five model year
vehicles on a rolling basis. See 68 FR
2912 (January 22, 2003). The SIP
revision we are acting on today would
establish additional vehicle categories
that would be exempt from emissions
testing requirements: collectible
vehicles in the Phoenix and Tucson
areas and motorcycles in the Tucson
area. Based on data for calendar year
2003, collectible vehicles make up 0.5
percent of the fleet of vehicles subject to
VEI in the Phoenix area, and collectible
vehicles and motorcycles together make
up 2.1 percent of the subject fleet in the
Tucson area. See Table 1 below.
TABLE 1.—PERCENTAGE OF FLEET AFFECTED BY SIP REVISION 1
Number of
vehicles
tested
Phoenix:
Total Tested Fleet ....................................................................................................................................................
Estimated Number of Collectible Vehicles ...............................................................................................................
Tucson:
Total Tested Fleet ....................................................................................................................................................
Estimated Number of Collectible Vehicles ...............................................................................................................
Number of Motorcycles ............................................................................................................................................
1 From
825,812
3,800
100.0
0.5
373,734
1,400
6,240
100.0
0.4
1.7
Table 1 on page 4 of the VEI SIP Revision.
Basic and enhanced I/M programs are
not required to test motorcycles.
However, the emissions testing of
motorcycles was shown to have a
significant air quality benefit in the
Phoenix area, so the State has not
adopted an exemption for motorcycles
in that area. The effect of the new
exemptions on the continued ability of
the VEI program in the Phoenix area to
meet the enhanced I/M program
performance standard is discussed
below in Section III.B.3, ‘‘Performance
Evaluation,’’ and the effect of the new
exemptions on emissions and ambient
air quality in both Phoenix and Tucson
is discussed herein in Section III.C,
‘‘Demonstrating Noninterference With
Attainment And Maintenance Under
CAA Section 110(l).’’
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Percent of
vehicle fleet
2. Compliance Enforcement
Section 51.361 of title 40 of the CFR
requires that denial of motor vehicle
registration be the method used to
ensure compliance with enhanced I/M
programs. ARS Section 49–542(D) and
Arizona Administrative Code (AAC)
R18–2–1007 require that all vehicles
must complete a vehicle emissions
inspection to obtain a vehicle
registration.
Collectible vehicles exempt from
emissions testing under the submitted
SIP revision are required to have
collectible vehicle insurance. This type
of vehicle is ‘‘maintained primarily for
use in car club activities, exhibitions,
parades or other functions of public
interest or for a private collection and is
used only infrequently for other
purposes’’ and ‘‘has a collectible vehicle
or classic automobile insurance
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
coverage that restricts the collectible
vehicle mileage or use, or both, and
requires the owner to have another
vehicle for personal use.’’ 3
The Arizona Department of
Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division
(MVD), will be able to track collectible
vehicles in cooperation with collectible
vehicle insurers. Insurers who submit
evidence of collectible vehicle
insurance to MVD will have those
vehicles automatically tagged in MVD’s
database to be exempt from testing at
renewal of registration. Should those
vehicles’ collectible insurance be
cancelled or not be renewed, MVD will
be notified by the insurer and will send
the vehicle owner a letter that the
collectible vehicle’s registration will be
cancelled. The owner of the vehicle has
14 days after receipt of the letter from
MVD to submit a new policy. If this is
not done, the vehicle’s registration is
cancelled, as is the exemption from
emissions testing.
In contrast to collectible vehicles,
exemption of motorcycles in the Tucson
area from emissions testing would be
straightforward from the standpoint of
compliance enforcement and would not
undermine compliance enforcement for
other types of vehicles that continue to
be subject to the emissions testing
requirements under the VEI program in
the Tucson area. Owners of motorcycles
registered in the Tucson area will
simply receive a registration or reregistration form from MVD that
indicates ‘‘emissions test not required.’’
3 See HB 2357, in Appendix A of the VEI SIP
submittal.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Therefore, we propose to find that the
Arizona VEI programs, as amended to
exempt collectible vehicles in the
Phoenix and Tucson areas and
motorcycles in the Tucson area,
continue to meet the compliance
enforcement requirements of 40 CFR
51.361.
3. Performance Evaluation
In our review of ADEQ’s VEI SIP
Revision submittal, we concluded that
the revision could not be approved
without a performance evaluation
demonstrating that the VEI program, as
amended to exempt collectible vehicles,
would continue to meet the federal
enhanced I/M performance standard
(codified at 40 CFR 51.351) in the
Phoenix area. The need for an updated
performance evaluation follows from
the fact that the Phoenix area, which
was designated as nonattainment for the
1-hour ozone NAAQS (at the time of
designation for the 8-hour ozone
nonattainment), is designated as
nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS and that enhanced I/M remains
an ‘‘applicable requirement’’ for such
areas under our final rule implementing
the 8-hour ozone NAAQS (see 40 CFR
51.900(f) and 51.905(a)(1)).
In response, ADEQ prepared an
updated performance evaluation using
the most recent version of EPA’s motor
vehicle emissions model, MOBILE6.2.
This updated evaluation was included
in the VEI SIP Supplement submitted to
EPA on October 3, 2006. The VEI SIP
Supplement includes a summary report
and paper copies of MOBILE6.2 input
and output files.
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
For the updated evaluation, ADEQ
developed and applied reduction factors
to exclude collectible vehicles from the
fleet tested under the VEI program as
provided for in HB 2357. ADEQ then
compared the emissions reduction
benefits from the revised VEI program
with the corresponding benefits that
would be achieved under EPA’s
alternate low enhanced I/M
performance standard.
The results of ADEQ’s analysis are
summarized in Table 2 below, which
shows that the emissions reduction
benefits achieved by the Arizona VEI
program as amended are higher than
those achieved under the performance
standard. The amended Arizona VEI
program continues to achieve greater
78119
emissions reductions than the federal
model program because the VEI program
includes elements that go beyond
federal I/M requirements. These include
a requirement for a one-time only
waiver, an implementation area beyond
the nonattainment area boundaries, and
denial of waivers for grossly-emitting
vehicles.
TABLE 2.—RESULTS OF ADEQ’S ALTERNATE LOW ENHANCED PERFORMANCE STANDARD MODELING 1
VOC
I/M Benefits in Area A (grams/mile) ........................................................................................................
I/M Performance Standard benefits (grams/mile) ....................................................................................
2008
NOX
CO
VOC
NOX
CO
0.21
0.16
0.10
0.02
3.66
2.91
0.07
0.04
0.09
0.01
1.40
1.02
1 The emission rates in this table represent the difference between the fleet-wide emission rate under the applicable program (i.e., amended
Arizona VEI program or EPA’s I/M model program) and the corresponding emission rate under the no-I/M scenario. See Tables 1, 2, and 3 of
appendix B to the VEI SIP Supplement.
Based on our review of the VEI SIP
Supplement, we find ADEQ’s methods
used to update the performance
standard evaluation and use of the
alternate low enhanced I/M
performance standard to be acceptable,
and we find that the VEI program, as
amended to exempt collectible vehicles
in the Phoenix area from the emissions
testing requirements, exceeds the
alternate low enhanced I/M
performance standard in the Phoenix
area as required under 40 CFR 51.351
and 51.905(a)(1). Therefore, we propose
to approve the updated performance
standard evaluation for the Phoenix VEI
program, as submitted on October 3,
2006 in the VEI SIP Supplement, as a
revision to the Phoenix portion of the
Arizona Ozone SIP.
C. Demonstrating Noninterference With
Attainment and Maintenance Under
CAA Section 110(l)
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Revisions to SIP-approved control
measures must meet the requirements of
Clean Air Act section 110(l) to be
approved by EPA. Section 110(l) states:
‘‘* * *. The Administrator shall not
approve a revision of a plan if the
revision would interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress (as defined in section 171), or
any other applicable requirement of this
Act.’’
We interpret section 110(l) to apply to
all requirements of the CAA and to all
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
areas of the country, whether
attainment, nonattainment,
unclassifiable, or maintenance for one
or more of the six criteria pollutants. We
also interpret section 110(l) to require a
demonstration addressing all pollutants
whose emissions and/or ambient
concentrations may change as a result of
the SIP revision. Thus, for example,
modification of a SIP-approved measure
may impact NOX emissions, which may
impact PM2.5. The scope and rigor of an
adequate section 110(l) demonstration
of noninterference depends on the air
quality status of the area, the potential
impact of the revision on air quality, the
pollutant(s) affected, and the nature of
the applicable CAA requirements.
As described above, the changes to
the Arizona VEI programs that would
occur with EPA approval of the two SIP
revision submittals evaluated herein
(i.e., the new exemptions from
emissions testing for collectible vehicles
in Phoenix and collectible vehicles and
motorcycles in Tucson) affect both the
Phoenix and Tucson areas. Therefore,
EPA needs to review the effect of the
exemptions in both of these areas before
we can determine whether we can
approve the two SIP revisions under
CAA section 110(l).
The VEI SIP Revision submittal that
seeks exemption of collectible vehicles
from the Phoenix enhanced I/M
program and collectible vehicles and
motorcycles from the Tucson basic I/M
program includes an evaluation of the
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
effects of the revisions to the VEI
programs on ozone, carbon monoxide,
PM2.5, and air toxics in both geographic
areas. The details of ADEQ’s evaluation
of the emissions effects and related
ambient air quality impacts of the new
exemptions are contained in ‘‘Report on
Potential Exemptions from Vehicle
Emissions Testing for Motorcycles,
Collectible Vehicles and Vehicles 25
Model Years Old and Older (December
2004)’’ (‘‘2004 Report’’), which was
included as Appendix B to the VEI SIP
Revision.
The 2004 report indicates that ADEQ
used the latest version of EPA’s motor
vehicle emissions model program,
MOBILE6.2, to estimate the emissions
effects of the new exemptions. The
methods used to gather data included
surveys of collectible vehicle insurers
and collectible vehicle and motorcycle
owners, in addition to acquisition of
data from the State vehicle emissions
inspections programs, other state
agencies, air quality planning agencies
and relevant air quality plans. We find
that ADEQ used reasonable methods
and appropriate models in estimating
the emissions effects of the new
exemptions. Table 3 below summarizes
ADEQ’s estimates by geographic area,
vehicle category, and pollutant in units
of metric tons per day (mtpd). Table 3
also shows the emissions impact as a
percentage of the overall pollutantspecific inventory in the applicable
area.
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
78120
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 3.—VOC AND CO EMISSIONS INVENTORY IMPACTED BY THE VEI SIP REVISION
Area-wide
total
emissions
inventory
(mtpd)
Vehicle category
Phoenix:
Collectible Vehicles:
VOC ...........................................................................................................................................
CO .............................................................................................................................................
Tucson:
Collectible Vehicles:
VOC ...........................................................................................................................................
CO .............................................................................................................................................
Motorcycles:
VOC ...........................................................................................................................................
CO .............................................................................................................................................
I/M benefit
from test
and repair
of vehicles 1
(mtpd)
Percent of
areawide
total
emissions
inventory
328.9
912.3
0.03
0.32
0.009
0.035
84.8
598.5
0.01
0.14
0.012
0.023
84.8
598.5
0.03
0.09
0.035
0.015
1 I/M Benefit = the reduction in emissions due to the repair of vehicles that exceed the prescribed emissions standards in Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R18–2–1031.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
1. Ozone
Ozone is formed by the interaction of
directly-emitted precursor emissions,
volatile organic compounds (VOC) and
oxides of nitrogen (NOX), in the
presence of sunlight under the influence
of meteorological and topographical
features of an area.
Phoenix. By rule effective June 15,
2004, EPA designated the Phoenix area
as a ‘‘basic’’ nonattainment area for the
new 8-hour ozone NAAQS based on
2001–2003 air quality monitoring data.
See 69 FR 23858 (April 30, 2004). As
indicated in Table 3 above, the revision
to the VEI program in Phoenix would
increase VOC emissions by 0.03 metric
tons per day, which represents
approximately 0.009% of the overall
VOC emissions inventory in this area
under existing conditions. ADEQ did
not estimate NOX emissions, but we
agree with ADEQ’s reasoning that any
change, positive or negative, in NOX
emissions would be minimal given the
small number of vehicles involved, the
fact that repairs to vehicles to reduce
VOC and CO emissions often result in
an incremental increase in NOX
emissions, and the small fraction of
collectible vehicles (approximately 8
percent) currently subject to NOX testing
(only those that are model years 1981
and newer).
These incremental emissions impacts
of the VEI SIP Revision would occur in
an area for which overall VOC and NOX
emissions are expected to decline.
Specifically, in the Phoenix area, overall
VOC emissions are expected to decrease
by 7% between 2006 and 2015 and
overall NOX emissions are expected to
decrease by 13% over the same period.4
4 See Maricopa Association of Governments
(MAG), ‘‘One-Hour Ozone Redesignation Request
and Maintenance Plan for the Maricopa County
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
Moreover, data collected by the ozone
monitoring network in the Phoenix area
appears to show that the area has
attained the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for
the years 2003–2005.5
Therefore, based on the minimal
likely effect of the VEI SIP Revision on
VOC and NOX emissions, the downward
trend in overall ozone precursor
emissions, and monitoring data that
appears to show that the area has
attained the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, we
find that exempting collectible vehicles
from emissions testing under the VEI
program would not interfere with
attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS
in the Phoenix area.
Tucson. EPA included the Tucson
area in ‘‘rest of state,’’ an area that we
designated as ‘‘unclassifiable/
attainment’’ for the new 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. See 69 FR 23858 (April 30,
2004). As indicated in Table 3 above,
the revision to the VEI program in
Tucson would increase VOC emissions
by 0.04 metric tons per day, which
represents approximately 0.047% of the
overall VOC emissions inventory in this
area under existing conditions. For the
reasons given above for the Phoenix
area, we would expect any change,
positive or negative, in NOX emissions
due to the VEI SIP Revision to be
minimal.
These incremental changes in ozone
precursor emissions would occur in an
area where the highest three-year
average of the annual fourth-highest
daily maximum level (i.e., the statistical
basis for the NAAQS) collected among
the nine stations comprising the ozone
monitoring network in the Tucson area
Nonattainment Area,’’ March 2004, pp. 3–11 and 3–
12.
5 See Table 4 in the VEI SIP Revision and see the
Quick Look Reports (dated August 14, 2006 and
August 31, 2006) included in the docket for this
proposed rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
was approximately 10% below the 8hour ozone NAAQS (based on 2003–
2005 data).6 As such, we agree with
ADEQ’s conclusion that the slight
change in ozone precursor emissions
from the exemption of collectible
vehicles and motorcycles from
emissions testing requirements of the
VEI program would not interfere with
continued attainment of the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS in the Tucson area.
2. Carbon Monoxide
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a product of
incomplete combustion of fuels. In most
urban areas, most of the CO comes from
motor vehicle exhaust.
Phoenix. In 2005, EPA redesignated
the Phoenix area for CO, and approved
a maintenance plan that provides for
maintenance of the CO NAAQS in that
area through 2015. See 70 FR 11553
(March 9, 2005) and 70 FR 52926
(September 6, 2005).
As indicated in Table 3 above, the
revision to the VEI program in Phoenix
would increase CO emissions by 0.32
metric tons per day, which represents
approximately 0.035% of the overall CO
emissions inventory in this area under
existing conditions. The incremental CO
emissions increase of the SIP revision
would occur in an area where overall
CO emissions are expected to remain
relatively constant over the next 10
years and where ambient CO levels are
well below the NAAQS. Specifically, in
the Phoenix area, overall CO emissions
are expected to decrease by only 1%
between 2006 and 2015,7 and the
6 See Table 5 of the VEI SIP Revision and the
Quick Look Reports (dated August 14, 2006 and
August 31, 2006) included in the docket for this
proposed rule.
7 See Maricopa Association of Governments,
‘‘Carbon Monoxide Redesignation Request and
Maintenance Plan for the Maricopa County
Nonattainment Area,’’ May 2003, pp. 3–10.
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
highest second-highest value (i.e., the
basis for the NAAQS) collected among
the 15 stations comprising the CO
monitoring network in the Phoenix area
is 5.1 parts per million (ppm), eighthour average, or less than 60% of the 8hour CO NAAQS (based on 2004–2005
data).8
Therefore, based on the minimal
estimated increase in CO emissions due
to the VEI SIP Revision, the relatively
constant level of overall CO emissions,
and monitoring data that shows that
ambient CO levels remain well below
the CO NAAQS, we find that exempting
collectible vehicles from emissions
testing under the VEI program would
not interfere with continued attainment
of the CO NAAQS in the Phoenix area.
Tucson. Tucson was designated as a
‘‘not classified’’ CO nonattainment area
following the CAA Amendments of
1990. See 56 FR 56694 (November 6,
1991). Arizona implemented its VEI
program in the Tucson area as part of
the control strategy to attain and
maintain the CO NAAQS in the area. In
2000, EPA redesignated the Tucson area
to attainment for CO and approved the
area’s maintenance plan, which
provides for maintenance of the CO
NAAQS through 2008. See 65 FR 36353
(June 8, 2000), 65 FR 50651 (August 21,
2000), and 69 FR 12802 (March 18,
2004).
As indicated in Table 3 above, the
revision to the VEI program in Tucson
would increase CO emissions by 0.23
metric tons per day, which represents
approximately 0.038% of the overall CO
emissions inventory in this area under
existing conditions. The incremental CO
emissions increase of the SIP revision
would occur in an area where ambient
CO levels are well below the NAAQS.
Specifically, in the Tucson area the
highest second-highest value (i.e., the
basis for the NAAQS) collected among
the six stations comprising the CO
monitoring network in the Tucson area
is 2.5 ppm, eight-hour average, or less
than 30% of the 8-hour CO NAAQS
(based on 2004–2005 data).9
Therefore, based on the minimal
estimated increase in CO emissions due
to the VEI SIP Revision and monitoring
data that shows that ambient CO levels
remain well below the CO NAAQS, we
find that exempting collectible vehicles
and motorcycles from emissions testing
under the VEI program would not
8 See Table 14 of the VEI SIP Revision and the
Quick Look Reports (dated August 14, 2006 and
August 31, 2006) included in the docket for this
proposed rule.
9 See Table 15 of the VEI SIP Revision and the
Quick Look Reports (dated August 14, 2006 and
August 31, 2006) included in the docket for this
proposed rule.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
interfere with continued attainment of
the CO NAAQS in the Tucson area.
3. Particulate Matter
EPA has promulgated different
NAAQS for particles with a nominal
aerodynamic diameter of 10 microns or
less (PM10) and for particles with a
nominal aerodynamic diameter of 2.5
micrometers (microns) or less (PM2.5).
Ambient PM10 and PM2.5 levels consist
of directly-emitted particles as well as
secondary particles formed through
atmospheric reactions involving such
precursors as NOX and SOX.
Phoenix. In 1990, the Phoenix area
was designated as a ‘‘moderate’’
nonattainment for the PM10 NAAQS by
operation of law under the CAA
Amendments of 1990. EPA reclassified
the area as ‘‘serious’’ in 1996. See 61 FR
21372 (May 10, 1996). In 2002, EPA
approved the ‘‘serious area’’ PM10 plan,
which was intended to provide for
attainment of the PM10 NAAQS in the
Phoenix area by 2006. See 67 FR 48718
(July 25, 2002); certain plan elements reapproved at 71 FR 43979 (August 3,
2006).
The Phoenix area PM10 attainment
plan relies largely on control of fugitive
dust sources such as paved and
unpaved roads, vacant disturbed lots,
and unpaved parking lots. On-road
vehicle exhaust accounts for
approximately 2.1% of the annual
average area-wide (directly-emitted)
PM10 inventory.10 The area continues to
violate both the annual and 24-hour
PM10 NAAQS and thus appears to have
failed to meet the PM10 NAAQS by the
2006 attainment date.11
PM10 emissions are emitted as a
product of incomplete combustion along
with such other pollutants as CO and
VOC, and because the exemption of
collectible vehicles from emissions
testing requirements of the VEI program
in the Phoenix area would
incrementally increase emissions of the
latter pollutants, it would also likely
result in the incremental increase of the
former as well. ADEQ did not quantify
the PM10 emissions impact of this new
exemption. However, we can safely
conclude that any such impact would be
negligible, even though the area will
likely miss its attainment deadline,
given the small number of vehicles
involved (see Table 1 herein), the
magnitude of the emission impact of
other products of incomplete
combustion (see Table 3 herein and
10 See Maricopa Association of Governments,
‘‘Revised MAG 1999 Serious Area Particulate Plan
for PM–10 for the Maricopa County Nonattainment
Area,’’ February 2000, pp. 8–15.
11 We will make this determination when qualityassured data for 2006 are available.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78121
related discussion of ozone and CO
above), and the small contribution of the
applicable source category (on-road
motor vehicle exhaust) to overall PM10
emissions in the Phoenix area. Thus, the
VEI SIP Revision would not interfere
with attainment of the PM10 NAAQS in
the Phoenix area.
Based on the same rationale, we can
also conclude that the exemption of
collectible vehicles from the emissions
testing requirements of the VEI program
in the Phoenix area would not interfere
with attainment of the NAAQS for
PM2.5, a pollutant for which the Phoenix
area is designated as ‘‘unclassifiable/
attainment.’’ See 70 FR 944 (January 5,
2005). Ambient PM2.5 concentrations in
the Phoenix area are well below the
applicable NAAQS.
Tucson. EPA has included the Tucson
area in the ‘‘unclassifiable’’ area
designation for the PM10 NAAQS and in
the county-specific ‘‘unclassifiable/
attainment’’ designation (i.e., Pima
County) for the PM2.5 NAAQS. See 57
FR 56762 (November 30, 1992), 70 FR
944 (January 5, 2005), and 40 CFR
81.303. Ambient PM10 and PM2.5
concentrations in the Tucson area are
well below the applicable NAAQS. For
the reasons given above for Phoenix, the
PM10 and PM2.5 emissions impact of
exemption of collectible vehicles and
motorcycles from emissions testing
requirements would be negligible and
would not interfere with continued
attainment of the PM10 and PM2.5
NAAQS in the Tucson area.
4. Air Toxics
Phoenix and Tucson. Since the CAA
does not have ambient air quality
standards for air toxics, the EPA’s
interpretation of section 110(l) is that an
area’s compliance with any applicable
MACT standards, as well as any Federal
Motor Vehicle Control Programs
(FMVCP) under sections 112 or 202(l) of
the CAA constitutes an acceptable
demonstration of noninterference for air
toxics. Motor vehicles are not subject to
MACT standards, and the VEI SIP
Revision will not interfere with any
Federal Motor Vehicle Control Programs
that apply in the area. For these reasons,
the State thus concludes, and EPA
concurs, that the VEI SIP Revision
would not interfere with any applicable
CAA requirements relative to air toxics.
5. Conclusion
Based on the above discussion, EPA
concludes that the changes to the
Arizona VEI programs that would occur
with EPA approval of the VEI SIP
Revision and VEI SIP Supplement (i.e.,
the exemptions from emissions testing
for collectible vehicles in the Phoenix
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
78122
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
area and collectible vehicles and
motorcycles in the Tucson area) would
not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of any of the NAAQS in
the Phoenix or Tucson areas and would
not interfere with any other applicable
requirement of the Act, and thus, are
approvable under CAA section 110(l).
Therefore, we propose to approve
statutory exemptions from emissions
testing for collectible vehicles in
Phoenix and collectible vehicles and
motorcycles in Tucson, as submitted on
December 23, 2005 in the VEI SIP
Revision, as a revision to the Phoenix
and Tucson portions of the Arizona CO
and Ozone SIPs.
D. Contingency Provisions of CAA
Section 175A(d)
In 2000, EPA redesignated the Tucson
area from nonattainment to attainment
for the CO NAAQS and approved a
maintenance plan. See 65 FR 36353
(June 8, 2000), 65 FR 50651 (August 21,
2000), and 69 FR 12802 (March 18,
2004). In 2005, EPA did the same for the
Phoenix area. See 70 FR 11553 (March
9, 2005) and 70 FR 52926 (September 6,
2005). The CO maintenance plans for
the two areas include contingency
elements or plans that we approved as
meeting the requirements of CAA
section 175A(d).
For the Phoenix area, the contingency
plan establishes an action (or trigger)
level protective of the NAAQS and
identifies several measures, including
expansion of ‘‘Area A’’ (the area in
which certain control measures apply),
for early implementation as well as
consideration of additional measures on
a set schedule following the triggering
event. For the Tucson area, the
contingency plan establishes trigger or
action levels as well as schedules for
review and collection of data and
consideration of adoption of control
measures from a preselected list of such
measures. At the time of redesignation
of the Phoenix and Tucson areas to
attainment for the CO NAAQS, the VEI
programs were adopted and approved
into the Arizona SIP and were assumed
to continue in effect throughout the
maintenance periods. Moreover, the VEI
programs at the time of redesignation of
these areas did not exempt collectible
vehicles or motorcycles in either area
from the emissions testing requirements.
Generally, contingency plans should
clearly identify the measures to be
adopted, a schedule and procedure for
adoption and implementation, and a
specific time limit for action by the
State and should also identify specific
indicators, or triggers, which will be
used to determine when the
contingency measures need to be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
implemented. See EPA Memorandum
from John Calcagni, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards,
entitled ‘‘Procedures for Processing
Requests to Redesignate Areas to
Attainment,’’ dated September 4, 1992.
At a minimum, CAA section 175A(d)
requires that the State adopt as
contingency measures all control
measures that had been approved in the
SIP for the area prior to redesignation
but that the State subsequently repeals
or relaxes. In this instance, because the
EPA-approved VEI emissions testing
requirements applied to collectible
vehicles and motorcycles at the time of
redesignation for the Phoenix and
Tucson areas, reinstatement of
emissions testing for these newlyexempt vehicle categories must be
adopted as contingency measures for the
Phoenix and Tucson CO maintenance
areas to comply with CAA section
175A(d).
ADEQ’s VEI SIP Supplement includes
two new contingency measures that
establish a binding commitment on
ADEQ to request Legislative action to
reinstate emissions testing for
collectible vehicles in the Phoenix area
or collectible vehicles and motorcycles
in the Tucson area should the
applicable area experience a violation of
the CO NAAQS. See pages 1 and 2 of
the VEI SIP Supplement. Specifically,
ADEQ’s contingency measures involve
notification to the Legislature by the
October following a violation of the CO
NAAQS in the Phoenix or Tucson areas.
After notifying the Legislature, ADEQ
will request that the Arizona Legislature
enact new legislation to reinstate the
categories of vehicles exempted through
EPA approval of the VEI SIP Revision
and VEI SIP Supplement (i.e.,
collectible vehicles in Phoenix or
collectible vehicles and motorcycles in
Tucson) during the General Legislative
Session that begins in January. ADEQ’s
request to the Legislature will call for
testing to be renewed for the newly
exempt vehicle categories in the
applicable area beginning the January
following the General Legislative
Session.
We view ADEQ’s contingency
measures in the context of the existing
EPA-approved CO contingency plans for
the Phoenix and Tucson areas, and as
such, we find that the plans, as
amended to include these new
contingency measures, continue to meet
the requirements of CAA section
175A(d), and that the new measures
themselves are consistent with relevant
EPA guidance. Therefore, we propose to
approve the contingency measures, as
adopted and submitted by ADEQ on
October 3, 2006 in the VEI SIP
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Supplement, as a revision to the
Phoenix and Tucson area portions of the
Arizona CO SIP.
IV. EPA’s Proposed Action and Request
for Public Comment
Under section 110(k) of the CAA, EPA
is proposing to approve the revisions to
the Arizona SIP submitted by the State
of Arizona on December 23, 2005 and
October 3, 2006 concerning the Arizona
VEI programs implemented in the
Phoenix and Tucson areas because we
find that the revisions are consistent
with the requirements of the CAA and
EPA’s regulations.
Specifically, we are proposing to
approve exemptions from emissions
testing requirements for collectible
vehicles in the Phoenix area and
collectible vehicles and motorcycles in
the Tucson area as set forth in the
‘‘Arizona State Implementation Plan
Revision, Basic and Enhanced Vehicle
Emissions Inspection/Maintenance
Programs’’ (December 2005) and ARS
Section 49–542 as amended in section 1
of Arizona House Bill 2357, 47th
Legislature, 1st Regular Session (2005)
and approved by the Governor on April
13, 2005; and the updated performance
standard evaluation for the Phoenix area
and new contingency measures as set
forth in the ‘‘Supplement to Final
Arizona State Implementation Plan
Revision, Basic and Enhanced Vehicle
Emissions Inspection/Maintenance
Programs, December 2005’’ (September
2006).
We will accept comments from the
public on this proposal for the next 30
days.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). This action merely proposes
to approve changes to state law as
meeting Federal requirements and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this proposed rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
proposes to approve changes to state
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Proposed Rules
by state law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
This proposed rule also does not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
proposes to approve changes to state
law implementing a Federal
requirement, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This proposed rule also
is not subject to Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because
it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. EPA
has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order. This proposed rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
oxides, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 12, 2006.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 9.
[FR Doc. E6–22305 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 80 and 86
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2006–0363; FRL–8263–5]
RIN 2060–AN66
Amendment to Tier 2 Vehicle Emission
Standards and Gasoline Sulfur
Requirements: Partial Exemption for
U.S. Pacific Island Territories
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed Rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to exempt
the three U.S. Pacific Island
Territories—American Samoa, Guam,
and the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands (C.N.M.I.)—from the
gasoline sulfur requirements that EPA
promulgated in the Tier 2 motor vehicle
rule. The Governor of American Samoa
petitioned us for an exemption from the
Tier 2 gasoline sulfur requirement
because of the potential for gasoline
shortages, the added cost, and the
minimal air quality benefits the Tier 2
gasoline sulfur requirement would
provide to American Samoa.
Representatives of the Governors of
Guam and C.N.M.I. have also requested
an exemption referencing the petition
submitted by American Samoa. The Far
East market, primarily Singapore,
supplies gasoline to the U.S. Pacific
Island Territories. The Tier 2 sulfur
standard effectively requires special
gasoline shipments, which would
increase the cost and could jeopardize
the security of the gasoline supply to the
Pacific Island Territories. The air quality
in American Samoa, Guam, and
C.N.M.I. is generally pristine, due to the
wet climate, strong prevailing winds,
and considerable distance from any
pollution sources. We recognize that
exempting the U.S. Pacific Island
Territories from the gasoline sulfur
standard will result in smaller emission
reductions. However, Tier 2 vehicles
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78123
using higher sulfur gasoline still emit
30% less hydrocarbons and 60% less
NOX than Tier 1 vehicles and negative
effects on the catalytic converter due to
the higher sulfur levels are, in many
cases, reversible. Additionally, these
reduced benefits are acceptable due to
the pristine air quality, the fact that
gasoline quality will not change, and the
cost and difficulty of consistently
acquiring Tier 2 compliant gasoline. The
Tier 2 motor vehicle rule also sets
standards for vehicle emissions.
Vehicles in use on the U.S. Pacific
Island Territories will not be exempt
from the Tier 2 vehicle emission
standards. However, additional
flexibility will be afforded due to the
lack of low sulfur gasoline.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 29, 2007. Request for
a public hearing must be received by
January 12, 2007. If we receive a request
for a public hearing, we will publish
information related to the timing and
location of the hearing and the timing of
a new deadline for public comments.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2006–0363, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Air Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC, 20460, Attention
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR–2006–
0363. In addition, please mail a copy of
your comments on the information
collection provisions to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Attn: Desk Officer for EPA, 725
17th St., NW., Washington, DC 20503.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2006–
0363. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
E:\FR\FM\28DEP1.SGM
28DEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78115-78123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22305]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2005-AZ-0009; FRL-8262-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Arizona; Motor
Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve two revisions to the Arizona State
Implementation Plan submitted by the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality. These revisions consist of changes to Arizona's
Basic and Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection Programs that would
exempt collectible vehicles in the Phoenix metropolitan area, and
collectible vehicles and motorcycles in the Tucson metropolitan area,
from emissions testing requirements; an updated performance standard
evaluation for the vehicle emissions inspection program in the Phoenix
area; and new contingency measures. EPA is proposing approval of these
two state implementation plan revisions because they meet all
applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA's regulations and
because the exemptions would not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the national ambient air quality standards in the two
affected areas. EPA is proposing this action under the Clean Air Act
obligation to take action on State submittals of revisions to state
implementation plans. The intended effect is to exempt these vehicle
categories from the emissions testing requirements of the State's
vehicle emissions inspection programs as approved for the Phoenix and
Tucson areas.
DATES: Written comments must be received at the address below on or
before January 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
[[Page 78116]]
OAR-2005-AZ-0009 by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
E-mail: tax.wienke@epa.gov.
Fax: (415) 947-3579 (please alert the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT if you are faxing comments).
Mail: Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning, Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, California 94105-3901.
Hand Delivery: Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning, Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 9, Mailcode AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California 94105-3901. Such deliveries are only accepted
Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:55 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-
2005-AZ-0009. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA, without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the
Office of Air Planning, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region
9, Mailcode AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California
94105-3901. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy of the
docket Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wienke Tax, Office of Air Planning,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, (520) 622-1622, e-mail:
tax.wienke@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we'',
``us'', and ``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Introduction and Background
II. Summary of Arizona's SIP Submittals
III. EPA Review of the SIP Revisions
A. CAA Procedural Provisions
B. I/M Program Requirements
1. Vehicle Coverage and Exemptions
2. Compliance Enforcement
3. Performance Evaluation
C. Demonstrating Noninterference With Attainment and Maintenance
Under CAA Section 110(l)
1. Ozone
2. Carbon Monoxide
3. Particulate Matter
4. Air Toxics
5. Conclusion
D. Contingency Provisions of CAA Section 175A(d)
IV. EPA's Proposed Action and Request For Public Comment
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Introduction and Background
In May 1995, EPA approved Arizona's Basic and Enhanced Vehicle
Emissions Inspection/Maintenance (VEI) Programs as meeting the
applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA
or ``Act'') and EPA's motor vehicle inspection and maintenance rule
(``EPA's I/M rule'' or ``federal I/M rule'') as amended. See 60 FR
22518 (May 8, 1995). A ``basic'' I/M program was required in the Tucson
Air Planning Area carbon monoxide (CO) nonattainment area (referred to
by Arizona in this context as ``Area B'') and in the Phoenix
metropolitan CO and ozone nonattainment area (referred to as ``Area
A''). The VEI programs were designed to reduce emissions of CO,
volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX).\1\ At that time, Arizona was not required to have an
``enhanced'' I/M program, although Arizona was implementing most
elements of an enhanced program in Phoenix. Arizona's program, as
implemented in Phoenix, however, was not approved as an enhanced
program, because the program did not satisfy all the requirements in
EPA's I/M rule for enhanced programs. An enhanced I/M program became a
requirement for the Phoenix area when the area was reclassified from
``moderate'' nonattainment to ``serious'' nonattainment for the CO
NAAQS effective August 28, 1996 (61 FR 39343, July 29, 1996), and when
the area was reclassified from ``moderate'' nonattainment to
``serious'' nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS effective February
13, 1998 (63 FR 7290, February 13, 1998).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Phoenix metropolitan area is also a nonattainment area
for respirable particulate matter (PM10); however, the
VEI program plays a very minor role in the control strategy for this
pollutant. There is no CAA requirement for I/M programs in
PM10 nonattainment areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since the Arizona VEI programs were originally approved in May
1995, EPA has amended the federal I/M rule several times to provide
states with more flexibility in designing their programs but also to
require testing of the on-board diagnostic (OBD) system. Since that
time, Arizona has also made a number of changes to its enhanced and
basic VEI programs.
In January 2003, we approved changes to the Arizona VEI programs
submitted to us on July 6, 2001 and April 10, 2002, including the
incorporation of OBD testing, an exemption for the first five model
year vehicles from the programs on a rolling basis, replacement of the
previously-approved remote sensing program in Phoenix with an on-road
testing study, and legislative changes to the waiver provisions. See 68
FR 2912 (January 22, 2003). In our January 2003 final rule, we also
approved the VEI program in the Phoenix area as meeting the enhanced I/
M program performance standard. In today's notice, we propose action on
a statutory change made by the Arizona Legislature to the Arizona VEI
programs to exempt certain categories of vehicles from emissions
testing requirements.
[[Page 78117]]
II. Summary of Arizona's SIP Submittals
The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) submitted
the most recent statutory changes to its Basic and Enhanced VEI
Programs as a revision to the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP)
on December 23, 2005 (``VEI SIP Revision''). The VEI SIP Revision
submittal includes the SIP revision itself, divided into a non-
regulatory portion, ``Final Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision,
Basic and Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection/Maintenance Programs''
(December 2005), and a regulatory portion, House Bill (HB) 2357, as
well as supporting materials related to legal authority, adoption,
public process and technical analysis.
HB 2357 amends the Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) Section 49-542 by
exempting vehicles that are at least 15 years old or are of a unique
and rare design and that carry collectible vehicle insurance that
restricts the mileage and/or use of the vehicle (``collectible
vehicles'') from emissions testing in both Area A (i.e., the Phoenix
area) and Area B (i.e., the Tucson area). In addition, HB 2357 exempts
motorcycles in the Tucson area from emissions testing. Specifically,
the amendments to ARS 49-542 are found in paragraphs or subparagraphs
(J)(2)(k), (J)(2)(l), (Y), and (Z) of that section of code. The changes
to ARS Section 49-542 are self-implementing, which means that they
become effective upon EPA approval as a revision to the Arizona SIP.
Among the technical materials included in the VEI SIP Revision
submittal package is a report \2\ prepared by ADEQ that evaluates the
impacts of exempting three vehicle categories (vehicles 25 model years
old and older, motorcycles, and collectible vehicles) from the
emissions testing requirements on ambient air quality and on the
ability of Areas A and B (i.e., Phoenix and Tucson, respectively) to
maintain or attain the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS).
The report concluded that the testing and repair of these vehicle
categories as a whole does provide a significant air quality benefit.
The analysis, however, also identified a subset of vehicle categories
(collectible vehicles in Phoenix and Tucson plus motorcycles in Tucson)
for which the emissions testing requirement does not provide a
significant air quality benefit and for which exemption would not
interfere with continued maintenance of the CO NAAQS or progress
towards the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. HB 2357 was a Legislative response to
the findings in this report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ``Report on Potential Exemptions from Vehicle Emissions
Testing for Motorcycles, Collectible Vehicles, and Vehicles 25 Model
Years Old and Older'' (December 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In consultation with EPA concerning the VEI SIP Revision, ADEQ
prepared an updated performance standard evaluation for the VEI program
in the Phoenix area to reflect the new exemption for collectible
vehicles, and developed new contingency measures that are intended to
provide for reinstatement of emissions testing for the newly exempt
vehicle categories in the event that a violation of the carbon monoxide
NAAQS were to be recorded in the Phoenix or Tucson areas. On October 3,
2006, ADEQ adopted and submitted the updated performance standard
evaluation and new contingency measures in a supplemental SIP revision,
entitled, ``Supplement to Final Arizona State Implementation Plan
Revision, Basic and Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection/Maintenance
Programs, December 2005'' (September 2006) (``VEI SIP Supplement''). As
part of the submittal of the VEI SIP Supplement, ADEQ documented the
public participation process that was conducted by ADEQ prior to
adoption and submittal to EPA.
III. EPA Review of the SIP Revisions
A. CAA Procedural Provisions
CAA section 110(l) requires revisions to a SIP to be adopted by the
state after reasonable notice and public hearing. EPA has promulgated
specific requirements for SIP revisions in 40 CFR part 51, subpart F.
On October 20 and 21, 2005, ADEQ published notices in newspapers of
general circulation in the Phoenix and Tucson areas of public hearings
on proposed revisions to the Arizona SIP to exempt collectible vehicles
in Phoenix and collectible vehicles and motorcycles in Tucson from
emissions testing requirements under the Arizona VEI programs (i.e., a
draft VEI SIP Revision). Public hearings were held on November 28, 2005
in Phoenix and November 30, 2005 in Tucson. On December 23, 2005, in
accordance with Arizona law, ADEQ adopted these exemptions as set forth
in ``Final Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision, Basic and
Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection/Maintenance Programs'' (December
2005) as a revision to the Arizona SIP and submitted the revision to
EPA for approval.
ADEQ followed a similar process in adopting and submitting the VEI
SIP Supplement. ADEQ held a public hearing in Tucson on August 30, 2006
and in Phoenix on August 31, 2006 on a draft VEI SIP Supplement and
adopted the VEI SIP Supplement on October 3, 2006 in accordance with
Arizona law prior to submittal to EPA as a revision to the Arizona SIP.
ADEQ's VEI SIP Revision and VEI SIP Supplement submittal packages
include evidence of public notice and hearing, ADEQ responses to public
comments, and ADEQ adoption as described above, and, based on review of
these materials, we find that ADEQ has met the procedural requirements
of CAA section 110(l) and 40 CFR part 51, subpart F.
B. I/M Program Requirements
As noted in Section I, Introduction and Background, herein,
Arizona's VEI programs were most recently approved as meeting federal
I/M program requirements on January 22, 2003 (68 FR 2912). Although the
Phoenix and Tucson areas have been redesignated to ``attainment'' for
the CO NAAQS, the VEI programs continue to be relied upon to maintain
the CO standard in those areas. Moreover, ``enhanced'' I/M remains an
``applicable requirement'' for the Phoenix area under our final rule
implementing the 8-hour ozone NAAQS (see 40 CFR 51.900(f) and
51.905(a)(1)) based on the designation of that area as a nonattainment
area for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS (and designation as nonattainment for
the 1-hour ozone NAAQS at the time of designation for the 8-hour
standard). Thus, to be approved, the VEI programs, as amended and
evaluated herein, must continue to meet the relevant enforceability
requirements for I/M programs in subpart S of 40 CFR part 51 and, for
the Phoenix area with respect to ozone, the enhanced performance
standard in 40 CFR 51.351. In the following paragraphs, we review
ADEQ's VEI SIP Revision and VEI SIP Supplement to determine whether the
amended VEI programs continue to meet federal I/M program requirements.
The aspects of I/M affected by the submitted revisions to the VEI
programs include vehicle coverage and exemptions, compliance
enforcement, and the performance standard evaluation.
1. Vehicle Coverage and Exemptions
The performance standard for enhanced I/M programs (including
alternate low enhanced programs) assumes coverage of all 1968 and later
model year light duty vehicles and trucks. Light duty trucks are not
included in the performance standard for basic I/M programs. Other
levels of coverage may be approved if the
[[Page 78118]]
necessary emission reductions are achieved. See 40 CFR 51.356.
The Arizona VEI programs approved by EPA in 1995 exempt several
categories of vehicles from the emissions testing requirements. Such
vehicle categories included, among others, vehicles manufactured in or
before the 1966 model year and vehicles being sold between motor
vehicle dealers. See 60 FR 22518, 22521 (May 8, 1995). In 2003, we
approved revisions to the VEI programs including an exemption for the
first five model year vehicles on a rolling basis. See 68 FR 2912
(January 22, 2003). The SIP revision we are acting on today would
establish additional vehicle categories that would be exempt from
emissions testing requirements: collectible vehicles in the Phoenix and
Tucson areas and motorcycles in the Tucson area. Based on data for
calendar year 2003, collectible vehicles make up 0.5 percent of the
fleet of vehicles subject to VEI in the Phoenix area, and collectible
vehicles and motorcycles together make up 2.1 percent of the subject
fleet in the Tucson area. See Table 1 below.
Table 1.--Percentage of Fleet Affected by SIP Revision \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Percent of
vehicles vehicle
tested fleet
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phoenix:
Total Tested Fleet........................ 825,812 100.0
Estimated Number of Collectible Vehicles.. 3,800 0.5
Tucson:
Total Tested Fleet........................ 373,734 100.0
Estimated Number of Collectible Vehicles.. 1,400 0.4
Number of Motorcycles..................... 6,240 1.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ From Table 1 on page 4 of the VEI SIP Revision.
Basic and enhanced I/M programs are not required to test
motorcycles. However, the emissions testing of motorcycles was shown to
have a significant air quality benefit in the Phoenix area, so the
State has not adopted an exemption for motorcycles in that area. The
effect of the new exemptions on the continued ability of the VEI
program in the Phoenix area to meet the enhanced I/M program
performance standard is discussed below in Section III.B.3,
``Performance Evaluation,'' and the effect of the new exemptions on
emissions and ambient air quality in both Phoenix and Tucson is
discussed herein in Section III.C, ``Demonstrating Noninterference With
Attainment And Maintenance Under CAA Section 110(l).''
2. Compliance Enforcement
Section 51.361 of title 40 of the CFR requires that denial of motor
vehicle registration be the method used to ensure compliance with
enhanced I/M programs. ARS Section 49-542(D) and Arizona Administrative
Code (AAC) R18-2-1007 require that all vehicles must complete a vehicle
emissions inspection to obtain a vehicle registration.
Collectible vehicles exempt from emissions testing under the
submitted SIP revision are required to have collectible vehicle
insurance. This type of vehicle is ``maintained primarily for use in
car club activities, exhibitions, parades or other functions of public
interest or for a private collection and is used only infrequently for
other purposes'' and ``has a collectible vehicle or classic automobile
insurance coverage that restricts the collectible vehicle mileage or
use, or both, and requires the owner to have another vehicle for
personal use.'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See HB 2357, in Appendix A of the VEI SIP submittal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Arizona Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division
(MVD), will be able to track collectible vehicles in cooperation with
collectible vehicle insurers. Insurers who submit evidence of
collectible vehicle insurance to MVD will have those vehicles
automatically tagged in MVD's database to be exempt from testing at
renewal of registration. Should those vehicles' collectible insurance
be cancelled or not be renewed, MVD will be notified by the insurer and
will send the vehicle owner a letter that the collectible vehicle's
registration will be cancelled. The owner of the vehicle has 14 days
after receipt of the letter from MVD to submit a new policy. If this is
not done, the vehicle's registration is cancelled, as is the exemption
from emissions testing.
In contrast to collectible vehicles, exemption of motorcycles in
the Tucson area from emissions testing would be straightforward from
the standpoint of compliance enforcement and would not undermine
compliance enforcement for other types of vehicles that continue to be
subject to the emissions testing requirements under the VEI program in
the Tucson area. Owners of motorcycles registered in the Tucson area
will simply receive a registration or re-registration form from MVD
that indicates ``emissions test not required.''
Therefore, we propose to find that the Arizona VEI programs, as
amended to exempt collectible vehicles in the Phoenix and Tucson areas
and motorcycles in the Tucson area, continue to meet the compliance
enforcement requirements of 40 CFR 51.361.
3. Performance Evaluation
In our review of ADEQ's VEI SIP Revision submittal, we concluded
that the revision could not be approved without a performance
evaluation demonstrating that the VEI program, as amended to exempt
collectible vehicles, would continue to meet the federal enhanced I/M
performance standard (codified at 40 CFR 51.351) in the Phoenix area.
The need for an updated performance evaluation follows from the fact
that the Phoenix area, which was designated as nonattainment for the 1-
hour ozone NAAQS (at the time of designation for the 8-hour ozone
nonattainment), is designated as nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS and that enhanced I/M remains an ``applicable requirement'' for
such areas under our final rule implementing the 8-hour ozone NAAQS
(see 40 CFR 51.900(f) and 51.905(a)(1)).
In response, ADEQ prepared an updated performance evaluation using
the most recent version of EPA's motor vehicle emissions model,
MOBILE6.2. This updated evaluation was included in the VEI SIP
Supplement submitted to EPA on October 3, 2006. The VEI SIP Supplement
includes a summary report and paper copies of MOBILE6.2 input and
output files.
[[Page 78119]]
For the updated evaluation, ADEQ developed and applied reduction
factors to exclude collectible vehicles from the fleet tested under the
VEI program as provided for in HB 2357. ADEQ then compared the
emissions reduction benefits from the revised VEI program with the
corresponding benefits that would be achieved under EPA's alternate low
enhanced I/M performance standard.
The results of ADEQ's analysis are summarized in Table 2 below,
which shows that the emissions reduction benefits achieved by the
Arizona VEI program as amended are higher than those achieved under the
performance standard. The amended Arizona VEI program continues to
achieve greater emissions reductions than the federal model program
because the VEI program includes elements that go beyond federal I/M
requirements. These include a requirement for a one-time only waiver,
an implementation area beyond the nonattainment area boundaries, and
denial of waivers for grossly-emitting vehicles.
Table 2.--Results of ADEQ's Alternate Low Enhanced Performance Standard
Modeling \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008
VOC NOX CO VOC NOX CO
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I/M Benefits in Area A (grams/ 0.21 0.10 3.66 0.07 0.09 1.40
mile)........................
I/M Performance Standard 0.16 0.02 2.91 0.04 0.01 1.02
benefits (grams/mile)........
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The emission rates in this table represent the difference between
the fleet-wide emission rate under the applicable program (i.e.,
amended Arizona VEI program or EPA's I/M model program) and the
corresponding emission rate under the no-I/M scenario. See Tables 1,
2, and 3 of appendix B to the VEI SIP Supplement.
Based on our review of the VEI SIP Supplement, we find ADEQ's
methods used to update the performance standard evaluation and use of
the alternate low enhanced I/M performance standard to be acceptable,
and we find that the VEI program, as amended to exempt collectible
vehicles in the Phoenix area from the emissions testing requirements,
exceeds the alternate low enhanced I/M performance standard in the
Phoenix area as required under 40 CFR 51.351 and 51.905(a)(1).
Therefore, we propose to approve the updated performance standard
evaluation for the Phoenix VEI program, as submitted on October 3, 2006
in the VEI SIP Supplement, as a revision to the Phoenix portion of the
Arizona Ozone SIP.
C. Demonstrating Noninterference With Attainment and Maintenance Under
CAA Section 110(l)
Revisions to SIP-approved control measures must meet the
requirements of Clean Air Act section 110(l) to be approved by EPA.
Section 110(l) states: ``* * *. The Administrator shall not approve a
revision of a plan if the revision would interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress (as
defined in section 171), or any other applicable requirement of this
Act.''
We interpret section 110(l) to apply to all requirements of the CAA
and to all areas of the country, whether attainment, nonattainment,
unclassifiable, or maintenance for one or more of the six criteria
pollutants. We also interpret section 110(l) to require a demonstration
addressing all pollutants whose emissions and/or ambient concentrations
may change as a result of the SIP revision. Thus, for example,
modification of a SIP-approved measure may impact NOX
emissions, which may impact PM2.5. The scope and rigor of an
adequate section 110(l) demonstration of noninterference depends on the
air quality status of the area, the potential impact of the revision on
air quality, the pollutant(s) affected, and the nature of the
applicable CAA requirements.
As described above, the changes to the Arizona VEI programs that
would occur with EPA approval of the two SIP revision submittals
evaluated herein (i.e., the new exemptions from emissions testing for
collectible vehicles in Phoenix and collectible vehicles and
motorcycles in Tucson) affect both the Phoenix and Tucson areas.
Therefore, EPA needs to review the effect of the exemptions in both of
these areas before we can determine whether we can approve the two SIP
revisions under CAA section 110(l).
The VEI SIP Revision submittal that seeks exemption of collectible
vehicles from the Phoenix enhanced I/M program and collectible vehicles
and motorcycles from the Tucson basic I/M program includes an
evaluation of the effects of the revisions to the VEI programs on
ozone, carbon monoxide, PM2.5, and air toxics in both
geographic areas. The details of ADEQ's evaluation of the emissions
effects and related ambient air quality impacts of the new exemptions
are contained in ``Report on Potential Exemptions from Vehicle
Emissions Testing for Motorcycles, Collectible Vehicles and Vehicles 25
Model Years Old and Older (December 2004)'' (``2004 Report''), which
was included as Appendix B to the VEI SIP Revision.
The 2004 report indicates that ADEQ used the latest version of
EPA's motor vehicle emissions model program, MOBILE6.2, to estimate the
emissions effects of the new exemptions. The methods used to gather
data included surveys of collectible vehicle insurers and collectible
vehicle and motorcycle owners, in addition to acquisition of data from
the State vehicle emissions inspections programs, other state agencies,
air quality planning agencies and relevant air quality plans. We find
that ADEQ used reasonable methods and appropriate models in estimating
the emissions effects of the new exemptions. Table 3 below summarizes
ADEQ's estimates by geographic area, vehicle category, and pollutant in
units of metric tons per day (mtpd). Table 3 also shows the emissions
impact as a percentage of the overall pollutant-specific inventory in
the applicable area.
[[Page 78120]]
Table 3.--VOC and CO Emissions Inventory Impacted by the VEI SIP
Revision
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Area-wide I/M benefit Percent of
total from test areawide
Vehicle category emissions and repair total
inventory of vehicles emissions
(mtpd) \1\ (mtpd) inventory
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phoenix:
Collectible Vehicles:
VOC...................... 328.9 0.03 0.009
CO....................... 912.3 0.32 0.035
Tucson:
Collectible Vehicles:
VOC...................... 84.8 0.01 0.012
CO....................... 598.5 0.14 0.023
Motorcycles:
VOC...................... 84.8 0.03 0.035
CO....................... 598.5 0.09 0.015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ I/M Benefit = the reduction in emissions due to the repair of
vehicles that exceed the prescribed emissions standards in Arizona
Administrative Code (A.A.C.) R18-2-1031.
1. Ozone
Ozone is formed by the interaction of directly-emitted precursor
emissions, volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxides of nitrogen
(NOX), in the presence of sunlight under the influence of
meteorological and topographical features of an area.
Phoenix. By rule effective June 15, 2004, EPA designated the
Phoenix area as a ``basic'' nonattainment area for the new 8-hour ozone
NAAQS based on 2001-2003 air quality monitoring data. See 69 FR 23858
(April 30, 2004). As indicated in Table 3 above, the revision to the
VEI program in Phoenix would increase VOC emissions by 0.03 metric tons
per day, which represents approximately 0.009% of the overall VOC
emissions inventory in this area under existing conditions. ADEQ did
not estimate NOX emissions, but we agree with ADEQ's
reasoning that any change, positive or negative, in NOX
emissions would be minimal given the small number of vehicles involved,
the fact that repairs to vehicles to reduce VOC and CO emissions often
result in an incremental increase in NOX emissions, and the
small fraction of collectible vehicles (approximately 8 percent)
currently subject to NOX testing (only those that are model
years 1981 and newer).
These incremental emissions impacts of the VEI SIP Revision would
occur in an area for which overall VOC and NOX emissions are
expected to decline. Specifically, in the Phoenix area, overall VOC
emissions are expected to decrease by 7% between 2006 and 2015 and
overall NOX emissions are expected to decrease by 13% over
the same period.\4\ Moreover, data collected by the ozone monitoring
network in the Phoenix area appears to show that the area has attained
the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the years 2003-2005.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), ``One-Hour
Ozone Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the Maricopa
County Nonattainment Area,'' March 2004, pp. 3-11 and 3-12.
\5\ See Table 4 in the VEI SIP Revision and see the Quick Look
Reports (dated August 14, 2006 and August 31, 2006) included in the
docket for this proposed rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, based on the minimal likely effect of the VEI SIP
Revision on VOC and NOX emissions, the downward trend in
overall ozone precursor emissions, and monitoring data that appears to
show that the area has attained the 8-hour ozone NAAQS, we find that
exempting collectible vehicles from emissions testing under the VEI
program would not interfere with attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS
in the Phoenix area.
Tucson. EPA included the Tucson area in ``rest of state,'' an area
that we designated as ``unclassifiable/attainment'' for the new 8-hour
ozone NAAQS. See 69 FR 23858 (April 30, 2004). As indicated in Table 3
above, the revision to the VEI program in Tucson would increase VOC
emissions by 0.04 metric tons per day, which represents approximately
0.047% of the overall VOC emissions inventory in this area under
existing conditions. For the reasons given above for the Phoenix area,
we would expect any change, positive or negative, in NOX
emissions due to the VEI SIP Revision to be minimal.
These incremental changes in ozone precursor emissions would occur
in an area where the highest three-year average of the annual fourth-
highest daily maximum level (i.e., the statistical basis for the NAAQS)
collected among the nine stations comprising the ozone monitoring
network in the Tucson area was approximately 10% below the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS (based on 2003-2005 data).\6\ As such, we agree with ADEQ's
conclusion that the slight change in ozone precursor emissions from the
exemption of collectible vehicles and motorcycles from emissions
testing requirements of the VEI program would not interfere with
continued attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Tucson area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Table 5 of the VEI SIP Revision and the Quick Look
Reports (dated August 14, 2006 and August 31, 2006) included in the
docket for this proposed rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Carbon Monoxide
Carbon monoxide (CO) is a product of incomplete combustion of
fuels. In most urban areas, most of the CO comes from motor vehicle
exhaust.
Phoenix. In 2005, EPA redesignated the Phoenix area for CO, and
approved a maintenance plan that provides for maintenance of the CO
NAAQS in that area through 2015. See 70 FR 11553 (March 9, 2005) and 70
FR 52926 (September 6, 2005).
As indicated in Table 3 above, the revision to the VEI program in
Phoenix would increase CO emissions by 0.32 metric tons per day, which
represents approximately 0.035% of the overall CO emissions inventory
in this area under existing conditions. The incremental CO emissions
increase of the SIP revision would occur in an area where overall CO
emissions are expected to remain relatively constant over the next 10
years and where ambient CO levels are well below the NAAQS.
Specifically, in the Phoenix area, overall CO emissions are expected to
decrease by only 1% between 2006 and 2015,\7\ and the
[[Page 78121]]
highest second-highest value (i.e., the basis for the NAAQS) collected
among the 15 stations comprising the CO monitoring network in the
Phoenix area is 5.1 parts per million (ppm), eight-hour average, or
less than 60% of the 8-hour CO NAAQS (based on 2004-2005 data).\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Maricopa Association of Governments, ``Carbon Monoxide
Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan for the Maricopa County
Nonattainment Area,'' May 2003, pp. 3-10.
\8\ See Table 14 of the VEI SIP Revision and the Quick Look
Reports (dated August 14, 2006 and August 31, 2006) included in the
docket for this proposed rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, based on the minimal estimated increase in CO emissions
due to the VEI SIP Revision, the relatively constant level of overall
CO emissions, and monitoring data that shows that ambient CO levels
remain well below the CO NAAQS, we find that exempting collectible
vehicles from emissions testing under the VEI program would not
interfere with continued attainment of the CO NAAQS in the Phoenix
area.
Tucson. Tucson was designated as a ``not classified'' CO
nonattainment area following the CAA Amendments of 1990. See 56 FR
56694 (November 6, 1991). Arizona implemented its VEI program in the
Tucson area as part of the control strategy to attain and maintain the
CO NAAQS in the area. In 2000, EPA redesignated the Tucson area to
attainment for CO and approved the area's maintenance plan, which
provides for maintenance of the CO NAAQS through 2008. See 65 FR 36353
(June 8, 2000), 65 FR 50651 (August 21, 2000), and 69 FR 12802 (March
18, 2004).
As indicated in Table 3 above, the revision to the VEI program in
Tucson would increase CO emissions by 0.23 metric tons per day, which
represents approximately 0.038% of the overall CO emissions inventory
in this area under existing conditions. The incremental CO emissions
increase of the SIP revision would occur in an area where ambient CO
levels are well below the NAAQS. Specifically, in the Tucson area the
highest second-highest value (i.e., the basis for the NAAQS) collected
among the six stations comprising the CO monitoring network in the
Tucson area is 2.5 ppm, eight-hour average, or less than 30% of the 8-
hour CO NAAQS (based on 2004-2005 data).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Table 15 of the VEI SIP Revision and the Quick Look
Reports (dated August 14, 2006 and August 31, 2006) included in the
docket for this proposed rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, based on the minimal estimated increase in CO emissions
due to the VEI SIP Revision and monitoring data that shows that ambient
CO levels remain well below the CO NAAQS, we find that exempting
collectible vehicles and motorcycles from emissions testing under the
VEI program would not interfere with continued attainment of the CO
NAAQS in the Tucson area.
3. Particulate Matter
EPA has promulgated different NAAQS for particles with a nominal
aerodynamic diameter of 10 microns or less (PM10) and for
particles with a nominal aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers
(microns) or less (PM2.5). Ambient PM10 and
PM2.5 levels consist of directly-emitted particles as well
as secondary particles formed through atmospheric reactions involving
such precursors as NOX and SOX.
Phoenix. In 1990, the Phoenix area was designated as a ``moderate''
nonattainment for the PM10 NAAQS by operation of law under
the CAA Amendments of 1990. EPA reclassified the area as ``serious'' in
1996. See 61 FR 21372 (May 10, 1996). In 2002, EPA approved the
``serious area'' PM10 plan, which was intended to provide
for attainment of the PM10 NAAQS in the Phoenix area by
2006. See 67 FR 48718 (July 25, 2002); certain plan elements re-
approved at 71 FR 43979 (August 3, 2006).
The Phoenix area PM10 attainment plan relies largely on
control of fugitive dust sources such as paved and unpaved roads,
vacant disturbed lots, and unpaved parking lots. On-road vehicle
exhaust accounts for approximately 2.1% of the annual average area-wide
(directly-emitted) PM10 inventory.\10\ The area continues to
violate both the annual and 24-hour PM10 NAAQS and thus
appears to have failed to meet the PM10 NAAQS by the 2006
attainment date.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Maricopa Association of Governments, ``Revised MAG 1999
Serious Area Particulate Plan for PM-10 for the Maricopa County
Nonattainment Area,'' February 2000, pp. 8-15.
\11\ We will make this determination when quality-assured data
for 2006 are available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PM10 emissions are emitted as a product of incomplete
combustion along with such other pollutants as CO and VOC, and because
the exemption of collectible vehicles from emissions testing
requirements of the VEI program in the Phoenix area would incrementally
increase emissions of the latter pollutants, it would also likely
result in the incremental increase of the former as well. ADEQ did not
quantify the PM10 emissions impact of this new exemption.
However, we can safely conclude that any such impact would be
negligible, even though the area will likely miss its attainment
deadline, given the small number of vehicles involved (see Table 1
herein), the magnitude of the emission impact of other products of
incomplete combustion (see Table 3 herein and related discussion of
ozone and CO above), and the small contribution of the applicable
source category (on-road motor vehicle exhaust) to overall
PM10 emissions in the Phoenix area. Thus, the VEI SIP
Revision would not interfere with attainment of the PM10
NAAQS in the Phoenix area.
Based on the same rationale, we can also conclude that the
exemption of collectible vehicles from the emissions testing
requirements of the VEI program in the Phoenix area would not interfere
with attainment of the NAAQS for PM2.5, a pollutant for
which the Phoenix area is designated as ``unclassifiable/attainment.''
See 70 FR 944 (January 5, 2005). Ambient PM2.5
concentrations in the Phoenix area are well below the applicable NAAQS.
Tucson. EPA has included the Tucson area in the ``unclassifiable''
area designation for the PM10 NAAQS and in the county-
specific ``unclassifiable/attainment'' designation (i.e., Pima County)
for the PM2.5 NAAQS. See 57 FR 56762 (November 30, 1992), 70
FR 944 (January 5, 2005), and 40 CFR 81.303. Ambient PM10
and PM2.5 concentrations in the Tucson area are well below
the applicable NAAQS. For the reasons given above for Phoenix, the
PM10 and PM2.5 emissions impact of exemption of
collectible vehicles and motorcycles from emissions testing
requirements would be negligible and would not interfere with continued
attainment of the PM10 and PM2.5 NAAQS in the
Tucson area.
4. Air Toxics
Phoenix and Tucson. Since the CAA does not have ambient air quality
standards for air toxics, the EPA's interpretation of section 110(l) is
that an area's compliance with any applicable MACT standards, as well
as any Federal Motor Vehicle Control Programs (FMVCP) under sections
112 or 202(l) of the CAA constitutes an acceptable demonstration of
noninterference for air toxics. Motor vehicles are not subject to MACT
standards, and the VEI SIP Revision will not interfere with any Federal
Motor Vehicle Control Programs that apply in the area. For these
reasons, the State thus concludes, and EPA concurs, that the VEI SIP
Revision would not interfere with any applicable CAA requirements
relative to air toxics.
5. Conclusion
Based on the above discussion, EPA concludes that the changes to
the Arizona VEI programs that would occur with EPA approval of the VEI
SIP Revision and VEI SIP Supplement (i.e., the exemptions from
emissions testing for collectible vehicles in the Phoenix
[[Page 78122]]
area and collectible vehicles and motorcycles in the Tucson area) would
not interfere with attainment or maintenance of any of the NAAQS in the
Phoenix or Tucson areas and would not interfere with any other
applicable requirement of the Act, and thus, are approvable under CAA
section 110(l). Therefore, we propose to approve statutory exemptions
from emissions testing for collectible vehicles in Phoenix and
collectible vehicles and motorcycles in Tucson, as submitted on
December 23, 2005 in the VEI SIP Revision, as a revision to the Phoenix
and Tucson portions of the Arizona CO and Ozone SIPs.
D. Contingency Provisions of CAA Section 175A(d)
In 2000, EPA redesignated the Tucson area from nonattainment to
attainment for the CO NAAQS and approved a maintenance plan. See 65 FR
36353 (June 8, 2000), 65 FR 50651 (August 21, 2000), and 69 FR 12802
(March 18, 2004). In 2005, EPA did the same for the Phoenix area. See
70 FR 11553 (March 9, 2005) and 70 FR 52926 (September 6, 2005). The CO
maintenance plans for the two areas include contingency elements or
plans that we approved as meeting the requirements of CAA section
175A(d).
For the Phoenix area, the contingency plan establishes an action
(or trigger) level protective of the NAAQS and identifies several
measures, including expansion of ``Area A'' (the area in which certain
control measures apply), for early implementation as well as
consideration of additional measures on a set schedule following the
triggering event. For the Tucson area, the contingency plan establishes
trigger or action levels as well as schedules for review and collection
of data and consideration of adoption of control measures from a
preselected list of such measures. At the time of redesignation of the
Phoenix and Tucson areas to attainment for the CO NAAQS, the VEI
programs were adopted and approved into the Arizona SIP and were
assumed to continue in effect throughout the maintenance periods.
Moreover, the VEI programs at the time of redesignation of these areas
did not exempt collectible vehicles or motorcycles in either area from
the emissions testing requirements.
Generally, contingency plans should clearly identify the measures
to be adopted, a schedule and procedure for adoption and
implementation, and a specific time limit for action by the State and
should also identify specific indicators, or triggers, which will be
used to determine when the contingency measures need to be implemented.
See EPA Memorandum from John Calcagni, Office of Air Quality Planning
and Standards, entitled ``Procedures for Processing Requests to
Redesignate Areas to Attainment,'' dated September 4, 1992. At a
minimum, CAA section 175A(d) requires that the State adopt as
contingency measures all control measures that had been approved in the
SIP for the area prior to redesignation but that the State subsequently
repeals or relaxes. In this instance, because the EPA-approved VEI
emissions testing requirements applied to collectible vehicles and
motorcycles at the time of redesignation for the Phoenix and Tucson
areas, reinstatement of emissions testing for these newly-exempt
vehicle categories must be adopted as contingency measures for the
Phoenix and Tucson CO maintenance areas to comply with CAA section
175A(d).
ADEQ's VEI SIP Supplement includes two new contingency measures
that establish a binding commitment on ADEQ to request Legislative
action to reinstate emissions testing for collectible vehicles in the
Phoenix area or collectible vehicles and motorcycles in the Tucson area
should the applicable area experience a violation of the CO NAAQS. See
pages 1 and 2 of the VEI SIP Supplement. Specifically, ADEQ's
contingency measures involve notification to the Legislature by the
October following a violation of the CO NAAQS in the Phoenix or Tucson
areas. After notifying the Legislature, ADEQ will request that the
Arizona Legislature enact new legislation to reinstate the categories
of vehicles exempted through EPA approval of the VEI SIP Revision and
VEI SIP Supplement (i.e., collectible vehicles in Phoenix or
collectible vehicles and motorcycles in Tucson) during the General
Legislative Session that begins in January. ADEQ's request to the
Legislature will call for testing to be renewed for the newly exempt
vehicle categories in the applicable area beginning the January
following the General Legislative Session.
We view ADEQ's contingency measures in the context of the existing
EPA-approved CO contingency plans for the Phoenix and Tucson areas, and
as such, we find that the plans, as amended to include these new
contingency measures, continue to meet the requirements of CAA section
175A(d), and that the new measures themselves are consistent with
relevant EPA guidance. Therefore, we propose to approve the contingency
measures, as adopted and submitted by ADEQ on October 3, 2006 in the
VEI SIP Supplement, as a revision to the Phoenix and Tucson area
portions of the Arizona CO SIP.
IV. EPA's Proposed Action and Request for Public Comment
Under section 110(k) of the CAA, EPA is proposing to approve the
revisions to the Arizona SIP submitted by the State of Arizona on
December 23, 2005 and October 3, 2006 concerning the Arizona VEI
programs implemented in the Phoenix and Tucson areas because we find
that the revisions are consistent with the requirements of the CAA and
EPA's regulations.
Specifically, we are proposing to approve exemptions from emissions
testing requirements for collectible vehicles in the Phoenix area and
collectible vehicles and motorcycles in the Tucson area as set forth in
the ``Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision, Basic and Enhanced
Vehicle Emissions Inspection/Maintenance Programs'' (December 2005) and
ARS Section 49-542 as amended in section 1 of Arizona House Bill 2357,
47th Legislature, 1st Regular Session (2005) and approved by the
Governor on April 13, 2005; and the updated performance standard
evaluation for the Phoenix area and new contingency measures as set
forth in the ``Supplement to Final Arizona State Implementation Plan
Revision, Basic and Enhanced Vehicle Emissions Inspection/Maintenance
Programs, December 2005'' (September 2006).
We will accept comments from the public on this proposal for the
next 30 days.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)).
This action merely proposes to approve changes to state law as meeting
Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies
that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve
changes to state law and does not impose any additional enforceable
duty beyond that required
[[Page 78123]]
by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly
or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This proposed rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), because it merely proposes to approve changes to state law
implementing a Federal requirement, and does not alter the relationship
or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3
of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This proposed rule does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 12, 2006.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 9.
[FR Doc. E6-22305 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
