Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Temporary Suspension of Provisions Regarding Continuance Referenda Under the Nectarine and Peach Marketing Orders, 78042-78044 [E6-22236]
Download as PDF
78042
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 21, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–22234 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Docket No. AMS–FV–06–0190; FV07–916/
917–2 IFR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in
California; Temporary Suspension of
Provisions Regarding Continuance
Referenda Under the Nectarine and
Peach Marketing Orders
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule temporarily
suspends order provisions that require
continuance referenda to be conducted
for the nectarine and peach marketing
orders during winter 2006–07. The
suspensions will enable the Department
of Agriculture (USDA) to postpone
conducting the continuance referenda
until the industry has had sufficient
time to evaluate the effects of recent
amendments to the marketing orders.
Temporary suspension of the
continuance referenda should also
minimize confusion during the
upcoming committee nomination
period, which overlaps with the
scheduled referenda period.
DATES: Effective December 29, 2006;
comments must be received by January
29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this action. Comments must
be sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., STOP
0237, Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax:
(202) 720–8938, E-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Laurel May, Marketing Order
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:10 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
Administration Branch, F&V, AMS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 205–
2830, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Laurel.May@usda.gov; or Kurt Kimmel,
Regional Manager, California Marketing
Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno,
California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
not later than 20 days after date of the
entry of the ruling.
This action temporarily suspends the
provisions in §§ 916.64(e) and 917.61(e)
of the orders, which specify when
continuance referenda should be
conducted to determine whether
growers favor continuance of the orders.
Temporary suspension of the provisions
for continuance referenda will provide
growers with more time to evaluate the
effects of recent amendments to the
orders before voting on continuance of
the marketing programs. Suspension of
the referenda requirements will also
diminish the confusion likely to occur
if the referenda are held during
upcoming committee nominations.
These actions were unanimously
recommended by the Nectarine
Administrative Committee (NAC) and
the Peach Commodity Committee (PCC)
(committees) at their August 31, 2006,
meetings.
This rule
is issued under Marketing Order Nos.
916 and 917 (7 CFR parts 916 and 917)
regulating the handling of nectarines
and peaches grown in California,
respectively, hereinafter referred to as
the ‘‘orders.’’ The orders are effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule suspends the
requirement that continuance referenda
be conducted during 2006–07. This rule
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing, USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
Nectarines
Section 916.64(e) of the nectarine
marking order currently provides that
USDA shall conduct a continuance
referendum between December 1 and
February 15 of every fourth fiscal period
since winter 1974–75 to ascertain
whether continuance of the order is
favored by nectarine growers. A
continuance referendum is, therefore,
scheduled to be conducted between
December 1, 2006, and February 15,
2007. Authorization to suspend the
continuance referendum requirement is
provided in § 916.64(b).
The NAC recommended that the
provision requiring the winter 2006–07
continuance referendum be temporarily
suspended to allow the industry time to
fully realize the impact of recent
amendments to the marketing order.
Amendments to the order were
approved by nectarine growers in a
referendum held in March 2006. The
majority of the amendments will not be
implemented until January 1, 2007. The
continuance referendum cycle will
resume as provided in § 916.64(e) in the
period between December 1, 2010, and
February 15, 2011. A referendum can be
held in the interim if deemed
appropriate by USDA.
Among the recent amendments to the
order are revisions to the NAC’s
nomination procedures, which require a
transition to mail balloting. Ballots for
the 2007–09 term of office must be
mailed to growers in January 2007. The
NAC believes that receiving both the
nomination ballots and the continuance
referenda ballots during this transitional
period would confuse growers, who
would then be less likely to return any
of the ballots. The committees expect
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
that temporary suspension of the
continuance referendum will minimize
confusion and maximize grower
participation in both the committee
nominations and the continuance
referendum. After this initial
transitional period, biennial committee
nominations should take place earlier in
the year and are not expected to overlap
with scheduled continuance referendum
periods.
Peaches
Section 917.61(e) of the peach
marketing order currently provides that
USDA shall conduct a continuance
referendum between December 1 and
February 15 of every fourth fiscal period
since winter 1974–75 to ascertain
whether continuance of the order is
favored by peach growers. A
continuance referendum is, therefore,
scheduled to be conducted between
December 1, 2006 and February 15,
2007. Authorization to suspend the
continuance referendum requirement is
provided in § 917.61(b).
The PCC recommended that the
provision requiring the winter 2006–07
continuance referendum be temporarily
suspended to allow the industry time to
fully realize the impact of recent
amendments to the marketing order.
Amendments to the order were
approved by peach growers in a
referendum held in March 2006. The
majority of the amendments will not be
implemented until January 1, 2007. The
continuance referendum cycle will
resume as provided in § 917.61(e) in the
period between December 1, 2010, and
February 15, 2011. A referendum can be
held in the interim if deemed
appropriate by USDA.
Section 917.61(e) also requires that
USDA conduct continuance referenda
regarding the provisions of Part 917
pertaining to pears. Although the
provisions pertaining to pears are
currently suspended, the pear referenda
are conducted concurrently with the
peach and nectarine continuance
referenda. In order to stay synchronized
with the peach and nectarine referenda,
the pear referendum will not be held
during the period between December 1,
2006, and February 15, 2007. The pear
continuance referendum cycle will
resume as provided in § 917.61(e) in the
period between December 1, 2010, and
February 15, 2011. A referendum can be
held in the interim if deemed
appropriate by USDA.
Among the recent amendments to the
order are revisions to the PCC’s
nomination procedures, which require a
transition to mail balloting. Ballots for
the 2007–09 term of office must be
mailed to growers in January 2007. The
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:10 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
PCC believes that receiving both the
nomination ballots and the continuance
referenda ballots during this transitional
period would confuse growers, who
would then be less likely to return any
of the ballots. The committees expect
that temporary suspension of the
continuance referendum will minimize
confusion and maximize grower
participation in both the committee
nominations and the continuance
referendum. After this initial
transitional period, biennial committee
nominations should take place earlier in
the year and are not expected to overlap
with scheduled continuance referendum
periods.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 150 handlers
of nectarines and peaches who are
subject to regulation under the order
and approximately 800 growers of these
fruits in the regulated area. Small
agricultural service firms, which
include handlers, have been defined by
the Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $6,500,000, and
small agricultural growers are defined as
those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000. The majority of these
handlers and growers may be classified
as small entities.
The committees’ staff has estimated
that there are fewer than 26 handlers in
the industry who could be defined as
other than small entities. For the 2005
season, the committees’ staff estimated
that the average handler price received
was $10.00 per container or container
equivalent of nectarines or peaches. A
handler would have to ship at least
600,000 containers to have annual
receipts of $6,000,000. Given data on
shipments maintained by the
committees’ staff and the average
handler price received during the 2005
season, the committees’ staff estimates
that small handlers represent
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78043
approximately 86 percent of all the
handlers within the industry.
The committees’ staff has also
estimated that fewer than 10 percent of
the growers in the industry could be
defined as other than small entities. For
the 2005 season, the committees’ staff
estimated the average grower price
received was $5.25 per container or
container equivalent for nectarines and
peaches. A grower would have to
produce at least 142,858 containers of
nectarines and peaches to have annual
receipts of $750,000. Given data
maintained by the committees’ staff and
the average grower price received
during the 2005 season, the committees’
staff estimates that small growers
represent more than 90 percent of the
producers within the industry.
With an average grower price of $5.25
per container or container equivalent,
and a combined packout of nectarines
and peaches of approximately
38,776,500 containers, the value of the
2005 packout is estimated to be
$203,576,600. Dividing this total
estimated grower revenue figure by the
estimated number of growers (800)
yields an estimated average revenue per
grower of about $254,471 from the sales
of peaches and nectarines.
This rule temporarily suspends the
provisions in §§ 916.64(e) and 917.61(e),
which specify the time period in which
continuance referenda should be
conducted to determine if growers favor
continuance of the nectarine and peach
marketing orders, respectively. Pursuant
to these provisions, the next
continuance referenda are scheduled for
the period between December 1, 2006,
and February 15, 2007. Authorization to
suspend these provisions is provided in
§§ 916.64(b) and 917.61(b) of the orders.
The committees recommended
suspension of these provisions to allow
the industry time to evaluate the effects
of recent amendments to the marketing
orders before voting on continuation of
the programs. For instance, several of
the amendments were intended to
increase industry participation in
program activities. Others were
intended to modernize the marketing
orders’ operations to better reflect
current industry business practices.
Postponing the referenda will give the
industry time to operate under the
amended orders and determine whether
the intended goals were met before the
next continuance referenda. The
continuance referenda cycles as
provided in §§ 916.64(e) and 917.61(e)
will resume in the period between
December 1, 2010, and February 15,
2011. Referenda can be held in the
interim if deemed appropriate by USDA.
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
78044
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 249 / Thursday, December 28, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
This action is also expected to
decrease the confusion likely to occur if
the continuance referenda scheduled for
the period between December 1, 2006,
and February 15, 2007, are held as
scheduled. Implementation of the order
amendments requires a transition to
mail balloting for NAC and PCC
nominations in January 2007, which
would overlap with the scheduled
continuance referenda. Growers could
each receive as many as four ballots
during the overlapping nominations and
referenda periods if they produce both
nectarines and peaches. The committees
are concerned that the flood of ballots
could confuse growers and discourage
them from participating fully. Therefore,
the committees recommended that the
continuance referenda be postponed.
After this initial transitional period the
biennial committee nominations should
take place earlier in the year and are not
expected to overlap with scheduled
continuance referenda periods.
One alternative to this action would
be to conduct the referenda as
scheduled. However, the committees
believe that growers need additional
time to evaluate the effectiveness of the
amendments that were adopted before
voting on continuation of the marketing
programs. Postponing the continuance
referenda until a later time is expected
to provide a better assessment of
industry support for the orders. Further,
if the continuance referenda were not
postponed the referenda period would
overlap with the committee
nominations period. Voter confusion
would likely occur due to the receipt of
multiple ballots during that time. The
committees were concerned that the
confusion would lead to decreased
grower participation in both the
referenda and the committee
nominations. Therefore, USDA has
determined that the provisions requiring
that continuance referenda be
conducted during the period between
December 1, 2006, and February 15,
2007, should be temporarily suspended.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
nectarine or peach handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
The AMS is committed to complying
with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:10 Dec 27, 2006
Jkt 211001
In addition, USDA has not identified
any relevant Federal rules that
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
Further, the committees’ meetings
were widely publicized throughout the
nectarine and peach industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meetings and participate in
committee deliberations. Like all
committee meetings, the August 31,
2006, meetings were public meetings
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express their views on this
issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited
to submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on the
temporary suspension of provisions
regarding the continuance referenda
under the California nectarine and
peach marketing orders. Any comments
received will be considered prior to
finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
committees’ recommendations, and
other information, it is found that the
order provisions suspended by this
interim final rule, as hereinafter set
forth, do not tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act for the 2006–
07 period.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule should be
implemented as soon as possible since
the nectarine and peach marketing order
continuance referenda periods are
scheduled to commence December 1,
2006; (2) the rule relaxes referenda
requirements for the nectarine and
peach industries; (3) the committees
discussed this issue at public meetings
and interested parties had opportunities
to provide input at those meetings; and
(4) the rule provides a 30-day comment
period and any comments received will
be considered period to finalization of
this rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR Parts 916 and 917 are
amended as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
parts 916 and 917 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
PART 916—NECTARINES GROWN IN
CALIFORNIA
§ 916.64
[Amended]
2. In paragraph (e) of § 916.64
Termination, the sentence ‘‘The
Secretary shall conduct such
referendum within the same period of
every fourth fiscal period thereafter.’’ is
temporarily suspended December 1,
2006, through February 15, 2007.
I
PART 917—FRESH PEARS AND
PEACHES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
§ 917.61
[Amended]
3. In paragraph (e) of § 917.61
Termination, the sentence ‘‘The
Secretary shall conduct such a
referendum within the same period of
every fourth fiscal period thereafter.’’ is
temporarily suspended December 1,
2006, through February 15, 2007.
I
Dated: December 21, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E6–22236 Filed 12–27–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 926
[Docket No. AMS–FV–06–0173; FV06–926–
1 IFR]
Data Collection, Reporting and
Recordkeeping Requirements
Applicable to Cranberries Not Subject
to the Cranberry Marketing Order;
Suspension of Provisions Under 7 CFR
Part 926
AGENCY:
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 249 (Thursday, December 28, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78042-78044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22236]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Parts 916 and 917
[Docket No. AMS-FV-06-0190; FV07-916/917-2 IFR]
Nectarines and Peaches Grown in California; Temporary Suspension
of Provisions Regarding Continuance Referenda Under the Nectarine and
Peach Marketing Orders
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule temporarily suspends order provisions that require
continuance referenda to be conducted for the nectarine and peach
marketing orders during winter 2006-07. The suspensions will enable the
Department of Agriculture (USDA) to postpone conducting the continuance
referenda until the industry has had sufficient time to evaluate the
effects of recent amendments to the marketing orders. Temporary
suspension of the continuance referenda should also minimize confusion
during the upcoming committee nomination period, which overlaps with
the scheduled referenda period.
DATES: Effective December 29, 2006; comments must be received by
January 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this action. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office
of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel May, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, F&V, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 205-2830, Fax:
(202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Laurel.May@usda.gov; or Kurt Kimmel,
Regional Manager, California Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order
Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202
Monterey Street, Suite 102B, Fresno, California 93721; Telephone: (559)
487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or E-mail: Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202)
720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
Nos. 916 and 917 (7 CFR parts 916 and 917) regulating the handling of
nectarines and peaches grown in California, respectively, hereinafter
referred to as the ``orders.'' The orders are effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
USDA is issuing this rule in conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule suspends the requirement that continuance
referenda be conducted during 2006-07. This rule will not preempt any
State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after date of the
entry of the ruling.
This action temporarily suspends the provisions in Sec. Sec.
916.64(e) and 917.61(e) of the orders, which specify when continuance
referenda should be conducted to determine whether growers favor
continuance of the orders. Temporary suspension of the provisions for
continuance referenda will provide growers with more time to evaluate
the effects of recent amendments to the orders before voting on
continuance of the marketing programs. Suspension of the referenda
requirements will also diminish the confusion likely to occur if the
referenda are held during upcoming committee nominations. These actions
were unanimously recommended by the Nectarine Administrative Committee
(NAC) and the Peach Commodity Committee (PCC) (committees) at their
August 31, 2006, meetings.
Nectarines
Section 916.64(e) of the nectarine marking order currently provides
that USDA shall conduct a continuance referendum between December 1 and
February 15 of every fourth fiscal period since winter 1974-75 to
ascertain whether continuance of the order is favored by nectarine
growers. A continuance referendum is, therefore, scheduled to be
conducted between December 1, 2006, and February 15, 2007.
Authorization to suspend the continuance referendum requirement is
provided in Sec. 916.64(b).
The NAC recommended that the provision requiring the winter 2006-07
continuance referendum be temporarily suspended to allow the industry
time to fully realize the impact of recent amendments to the marketing
order. Amendments to the order were approved by nectarine growers in a
referendum held in March 2006. The majority of the amendments will not
be implemented until January 1, 2007. The continuance referendum cycle
will resume as provided in Sec. 916.64(e) in the period between
December 1, 2010, and February 15, 2011. A referendum can be held in
the interim if deemed appropriate by USDA.
Among the recent amendments to the order are revisions to the NAC's
nomination procedures, which require a transition to mail balloting.
Ballots for the 2007-09 term of office must be mailed to growers in
January 2007. The NAC believes that receiving both the nomination
ballots and the continuance referenda ballots during this transitional
period would confuse growers, who would then be less likely to return
any of the ballots. The committees expect
[[Page 78043]]
that temporary suspension of the continuance referendum will minimize
confusion and maximize grower participation in both the committee
nominations and the continuance referendum. After this initial
transitional period, biennial committee nominations should take place
earlier in the year and are not expected to overlap with scheduled
continuance referendum periods.
Peaches
Section 917.61(e) of the peach marketing order currently provides
that USDA shall conduct a continuance referendum between December 1 and
February 15 of every fourth fiscal period since winter 1974-75 to
ascertain whether continuance of the order is favored by peach growers.
A continuance referendum is, therefore, scheduled to be conducted
between December 1, 2006 and February 15, 2007. Authorization to
suspend the continuance referendum requirement is provided in Sec.
917.61(b).
The PCC recommended that the provision requiring the winter 2006-07
continuance referendum be temporarily suspended to allow the industry
time to fully realize the impact of recent amendments to the marketing
order. Amendments to the order were approved by peach growers in a
referendum held in March 2006. The majority of the amendments will not
be implemented until January 1, 2007. The continuance referendum cycle
will resume as provided in Sec. 917.61(e) in the period between
December 1, 2010, and February 15, 2011. A referendum can be held in
the interim if deemed appropriate by USDA.
Section 917.61(e) also requires that USDA conduct continuance
referenda regarding the provisions of Part 917 pertaining to pears.
Although the provisions pertaining to pears are currently suspended,
the pear referenda are conducted concurrently with the peach and
nectarine continuance referenda. In order to stay synchronized with the
peach and nectarine referenda, the pear referendum will not be held
during the period between December 1, 2006, and February 15, 2007. The
pear continuance referendum cycle will resume as provided in Sec.
917.61(e) in the period between December 1, 2010, and February 15,
2011. A referendum can be held in the interim if deemed appropriate by
USDA.
Among the recent amendments to the order are revisions to the PCC's
nomination procedures, which require a transition to mail balloting.
Ballots for the 2007-09 term of office must be mailed to growers in
January 2007. The PCC believes that receiving both the nomination
ballots and the continuance referenda ballots during this transitional
period would confuse growers, who would then be less likely to return
any of the ballots. The committees expect that temporary suspension of
the continuance referendum will minimize confusion and maximize grower
participation in both the committee nominations and the continuance
referendum. After this initial transitional period, biennial committee
nominations should take place earlier in the year and are not expected
to overlap with scheduled continuance referendum periods.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the
economic impact of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has
prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 150 handlers of nectarines and peaches who
are subject to regulation under the order and approximately 800 growers
of these fruits in the regulated area. Small agricultural service
firms, which include handlers, have been defined by the Small Business
Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those having annual receipts of less
than $6,500,000, and small agricultural growers are defined as those
having annual receipts of less than $750,000. The majority of these
handlers and growers may be classified as small entities.
The committees' staff has estimated that there are fewer than 26
handlers in the industry who could be defined as other than small
entities. For the 2005 season, the committees' staff estimated that the
average handler price received was $10.00 per container or container
equivalent of nectarines or peaches. A handler would have to ship at
least 600,000 containers to have annual receipts of $6,000,000. Given
data on shipments maintained by the committees' staff and the average
handler price received during the 2005 season, the committees' staff
estimates that small handlers represent approximately 86 percent of all
the handlers within the industry.
The committees' staff has also estimated that fewer than 10 percent
of the growers in the industry could be defined as other than small
entities. For the 2005 season, the committees' staff estimated the
average grower price received was $5.25 per container or container
equivalent for nectarines and peaches. A grower would have to produce
at least 142,858 containers of nectarines and peaches to have annual
receipts of $750,000. Given data maintained by the committees' staff
and the average grower price received during the 2005 season, the
committees' staff estimates that small growers represent more than 90
percent of the producers within the industry.
With an average grower price of $5.25 per container or container
equivalent, and a combined packout of nectarines and peaches of
approximately 38,776,500 containers, the value of the 2005 packout is
estimated to be $203,576,600. Dividing this total estimated grower
revenue figure by the estimated number of growers (800) yields an
estimated average revenue per grower of about $254,471 from the sales
of peaches and nectarines.
This rule temporarily suspends the provisions in Sec. Sec.
916.64(e) and 917.61(e), which specify the time period in which
continuance referenda should be conducted to determine if growers favor
continuance of the nectarine and peach marketing orders, respectively.
Pursuant to these provisions, the next continuance referenda are
scheduled for the period between December 1, 2006, and February 15,
2007. Authorization to suspend these provisions is provided in
Sec. Sec. 916.64(b) and 917.61(b) of the orders.
The committees recommended suspension of these provisions to allow
the industry time to evaluate the effects of recent amendments to the
marketing orders before voting on continuation of the programs. For
instance, several of the amendments were intended to increase industry
participation in program activities. Others were intended to modernize
the marketing orders' operations to better reflect current industry
business practices. Postponing the referenda will give the industry
time to operate under the amended orders and determine whether the
intended goals were met before the next continuance referenda. The
continuance referenda cycles as provided in Sec. Sec. 916.64(e) and
917.61(e) will resume in the period between December 1, 2010, and
February 15, 2011. Referenda can be held in the interim if deemed
appropriate by USDA.
[[Page 78044]]
This action is also expected to decrease the confusion likely to
occur if the continuance referenda scheduled for the period between
December 1, 2006, and February 15, 2007, are held as scheduled.
Implementation of the order amendments requires a transition to mail
balloting for NAC and PCC nominations in January 2007, which would
overlap with the scheduled continuance referenda. Growers could each
receive as many as four ballots during the overlapping nominations and
referenda periods if they produce both nectarines and peaches. The
committees are concerned that the flood of ballots could confuse
growers and discourage them from participating fully. Therefore, the
committees recommended that the continuance referenda be postponed.
After this initial transitional period the biennial committee
nominations should take place earlier in the year and are not expected
to overlap with scheduled continuance referenda periods.
One alternative to this action would be to conduct the referenda as
scheduled. However, the committees believe that growers need additional
time to evaluate the effectiveness of the amendments that were adopted
before voting on continuation of the marketing programs. Postponing the
continuance referenda until a later time is expected to provide a
better assessment of industry support for the orders. Further, if the
continuance referenda were not postponed the referenda period would
overlap with the committee nominations period. Voter confusion would
likely occur due to the receipt of multiple ballots during that time.
The committees were concerned that the confusion would lead to
decreased grower participation in both the referenda and the committee
nominations. Therefore, USDA has determined that the provisions
requiring that continuance referenda be conducted during the period
between December 1, 2006, and February 15, 2007, should be temporarily
suspended.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large nectarine or peach handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies.
The AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule.
Further, the committees' meetings were widely publicized throughout
the nectarine and peach industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meetings and participate in committee
deliberations. Like all committee meetings, the August 31, 2006,
meetings were public meetings and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express their views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to submit information on
the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small
businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: http:/
/www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on the temporary suspension of
provisions regarding the continuance referenda under the California
nectarine and peach marketing orders. Any comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the committees' recommendations, and other information, it is found
that the order provisions suspended by this interim final rule, as
hereinafter set forth, do not tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act for the 2006-07 period.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) This rule should be implemented as soon as possible since
the nectarine and peach marketing order continuance referenda periods
are scheduled to commence December 1, 2006; (2) the rule relaxes
referenda requirements for the nectarine and peach industries; (3) the
committees discussed this issue at public meetings and interested
parties had opportunities to provide input at those meetings; and (4)
the rule provides a 30-day comment period and any comments received
will be considered period to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects
7 CFR Part 916
Marketing agreements, Nectarines, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
7 CFR Part 917
Marketing agreements, Peaches, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR Parts 916 and 917 are
amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR parts 916 and 917 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
PART 916--NECTARINES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
Sec. 916.64 [Amended]
0
2. In paragraph (e) of Sec. 916.64 Termination, the sentence ``The
Secretary shall conduct such referendum within the same period of every
fourth fiscal period thereafter.'' is temporarily suspended December 1,
2006, through February 15, 2007.
PART 917--FRESH PEARS AND PEACHES GROWN IN CALIFORNIA
Sec. 917.61 [Amended]
0
3. In paragraph (e) of Sec. 917.61 Termination, the sentence ``The
Secretary shall conduct such a referendum within the same period of
every fourth fiscal period thereafter.'' is temporarily suspended
December 1, 2006, through February 15, 2007.
Dated: December 21, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E6-22236 Filed 12-27-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P