Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB-135BJ Airplanes, 77629-77631 [E6-22115]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 27, 2006 / Proposed Rules Environmental Evaluation This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore, neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact Statement is needed. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Background FCIC proposes to amend 7 CFR part 457 Common Crop Insurance Regulations by amending § 457.165 Millet crop insurance provisions, to be effective for the 2008 and succeeding crop years. Currently, the Millet Crop Provisions specify if the millet crop is not swathed and not harvested, the amount of the indemnity payable is reduced 30 percent to reflect those costs not incurred by the producer. In addition, if the millet crop is swathed but not harvested the amount of the indemnity payable is reduced by 15 percent to reflect those costs not incurred by the producer. Historically, millet prices have been very volatile throughout the growing season. The reduction in indemnity payment was designed to provide an incentive for producers to harvest the millet crop regardless of the millet price and avoid the potential for producers to shift losses to the crop insurance policy because the value of the crop insurance exceeded the value of the crop. The indemnity reduction for unharvested millet acreage has resulted in some insured millet producers choosing to harvest the millet crop when little or no potential production to count exists to avoid the reduced indemnity payment. FCIC has reviewed the situation and has determined that the disadvantage to producers who suffer legitimate losses from the reduction of the indemnity outweighs the potential for the shifting of losses to crop insurance. Accurate appraisals should ensure that producers are only paid for legitimate losses and receive the appropriate amount of indemnity. As a result of this change, premium rates will have to be increased because the amount of indemnity actually paid will increase and the premium is based on these anticipated losses. These premium rate increases were discussed with millet producers, who indicated a willingness to pay the projected 8–10 percent premium rate increase to remove the unharvested acreage indemnity reduction. The projected premium rate increase may be revised depending upon the experience of the proposed change. The proposed changes are as follows: VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:37 Dec 26, 2006 Jkt 211001 Section 7—FCIC proposes to revise the end of the insurance period dates and to use only one date rather than dual dates. Only one date is necessary for the end of the insurance period for each group of states because of the removal of the unharvested acreage indemnity reduction. Section 8—In section 8(h), FCIC is proposing to clarify failure of the irrigation water supply that occurs during the insurance period is a covered cause of loss if such failure is due to a cause of loss specified in the Crop Provisions. This makes the Millet Crop Provisions consistent with other Crop Provisions and ensures that only named perils are covered under the policy. Section 10—FCIC proposes to remove section 10(f) to eliminate the reduction in indemnity for unharvested millet acreage and remove any references to that subsection. FCIC is also proposing to amend the example to correct plural terms to singular and singular terms to plural where necessary. Section 11—FCIC proposes to amend sections 11(a) and (b) to change the references from ‘‘percent’’ to ‘‘percent per day’’. Previously the provisions could have been interpreted that the guarantee would be reduced one percent total for the first ten days and three percent total for the following ten days. This makes the provisions consistent with other Crop Provisions. Section 12—FCIC proposes to amend the second sentence to refer to additional levels of coverage to be consistent with other Crop Provisions. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457 Crop insurance, Millet, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Proposed Rule Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR part 457 to read as follows: 77629 the phrase ‘‘700 bushel’’ and adding the phrase ‘‘700 bushels’’ in its place. G. Amend section 10(d)(4)(iii) by removing the semicolon at the end of the current text and adding a period in its place. H. Remove section 10(f). I. Amend section 11(a) by adding the phrase ‘‘per day’’ after the phrase ‘‘One percent’’. J. Amend section 11(b) by adding the phrase ‘‘per day’’ after the phrase ‘‘Three percent’’. K. Amend section 12 by removing the phrase ‘‘an additional coverage level’’ and adding the phrase ‘‘additional levels of coverage’’ in its place. The revised text reads as follows: § 457.165 Millet crop insurance provisions. The millet crop insurance provisions for the 2008 and succeeding crop years are as follows: * * * * * 7. Insurance Period In accordance with section 11 of the Basic Provisions, the calendar date for the end of insurance period is the date immediately following planting (unless otherwise specified in the Special Provisions) as follows: (a) October 10 for North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wyoming; and (b) October 31 for all other states. 8. Causes of Loss * * * * * (h) Failure of the irrigation water supply due to a cause of loss specified in sections 8(a) through (g) that also occurs during the insurance period. * * * * * Signed in Washington, DC, on December 14, 2006. Eldon Gould, Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. [FR Doc. E6–22002 Filed 12–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–08–P PART 457—COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as follows: Federal Aviation Administration Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(1), 1506(p). 2. Amend § 457.165 as follows: A. Revise the introductory text. B. Revise section 7. C. Revise section 8(h). D. Amend section 10(b)(4) by removing the phrase ‘‘and any adjustment from section 10(f)’’. E. Amend paragraph (2) of the example in section 10(b) by removing the phrase ‘‘1,500 bushels’’ and adding the phrase ‘‘1,500 bushel’’ in its place. F. Amend paragraph (3) of the example in section 10(b) by removing PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2006–26685; Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–200–AD] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB–135BJ Airplanes Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM 27DEP1 77630 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 27, 2006 / Proposed Rules Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). ACTION: SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB–135BJ airplanes. This proposed AD would require modifying the forward and aft auxiliary fuel tanks. This proposed AD results from a report of sparks due to chafing between the harnesses of the forward and aft auxiliary fuel tanks, between certain harnesses attached to the aircraft structure, or between certain harnesses attached to certain mechanical components. We are proposing this AD to prevent a potential ignition source inside a fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion. DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 26, 2007. ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on this proposed AD. • DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your comments electronically. • Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590. • Fax: (202) 493–2251. • Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Contact Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), P.O. Box 343—CEP 12.225, Sao Jose dos Campos—SP, Brazil, for service information identified in this proposed AD. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM–116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–2125; fax (425) 227–1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Comments Invited We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ‘‘FAA–2006–26685; Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–200–AD’’ at the VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:37 Dec 26, 2006 Jkt 211001 beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD in light of those comments. We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https:// dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78), or you may visit https:// dms.dot.gov. Examining the Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System receives them. Discussion The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a regulation titled ‘‘Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review, Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements’’ (66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (‘‘SFAR 88,’’ Amendment 21–78, and subsequent Amendments 21–82 and 21–83). Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e., type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders to substantiate PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews. In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, single failures in combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for further action. The Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) has issued a regulation that is similar to SFAR 88. (The JAA is an associated body of the European Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) representing the civil aviation regulatory authorities of a number of European States who have agreed to co-operate in developing and implementing common safety regulatory standards and procedures.) Under this regulation, the JAA stated that all members of the ECAC that hold type certificates for transport category airplanes are required to conduct a design review against explosion risks. We have determined that the actions identified in this proposed AD are necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion. Relevant Service Information EMBRAER has issued Service Bulletin 145LEG–28–0022, dated February 17, 2005. The service bulletin describes procedures for modifying the forward and aft auxiliary fuel tanks. The modification includes, but is not limited to, re-routing the harnesses at the forward and aft fuel tanks; installing bonding jumpers, and electrical bonding of the refueling and vent lines at the forward fuel tanks and the solenoid valves of the aft fuel tanks; and E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM 27DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 27, 2006 / Proposed Rules installing new support assemblies of the harnesses of the aft fuel tanks. Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information is intended to adequately address the unsafe ˆ condition. The Agencia Nacional de Avicaco Civil (ANAC) mandated the ¸˜ service information and issued Brazilian airworthiness directive 2006–07–03, effective August 23, 2006, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in Brazil. FAA’s Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD This airplane model is manufactured in Brazil and is type certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the ANAC has kept the FAA informed of the situation described above. We have examined the ANAC’s findings, evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to issue an AD for airplanes of this type design that are certificated for operation in the United States. Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which would require accomplishing the actions specified in the service information described previously. sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS Costs of Compliance This proposed AD would affect about 27 airplanes of U.S. registry. The proposed modifications would take about 20 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts would cost $2,200 per airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the proposed modifications for U.S. operators is $102,600, or $3,800 per airplane. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA’s authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:37 Dec 26, 2006 Jkt 211001 that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed regulation: 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. The Proposed Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. § 39.13 [Amended] 2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA– 2006–26685; Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–200–AD. Comments Due Date (a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January 26, 2007. Affected ADs (b) None. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Applicability (c) This AD applies to all EMBRAER Model EMB–135BJ airplanes, certificated in any category. Unsafe Condition (d) This AD results from a report of sparks due to chafing between the harnesses of the forward and aft auxiliary fuel tanks, between certain harnesses attached to the aircraft structure, or between certain harnesses attached to certain mechanical components. We are issuing this AD to prevent a potential ignition source inside a fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion. Compliance (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. Modifications (f) Within 5,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD: Accomplish the modifications specified in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) of this AD by doing all the applicable actions in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145LEG–28–0022, dated February 17, 2005. (1) Modify the forward auxiliary fuel tank. (2) Modify the aft auxiliary fuel tanks on the left and right sides. Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (g)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. (2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding District Office. Related Information (h) Brazilian airworthiness directive 2006–07–03, effective August 23, 2006, also addresses the subject of this AD. Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 19, 2006. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E6–22115 Filed 12–26–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 77631 E:\FR\FM\27DEP1.SGM 27DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77629-77631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-22115]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2006-26685; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-200-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. 
(EMBRAER) Model EMB-135BJ Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

[[Page 77630]]


ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) 
for all Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model EMB-
135BJ airplanes. This proposed AD would require modifying the forward 
and aft auxiliary fuel tanks. This proposed AD results from a report of 
sparks due to chafing between the harnesses of the forward and aft 
auxiliary fuel tanks, between certain harnesses attached to the 
aircraft structure, or between certain harnesses attached to certain 
mechanical components. We are proposing this AD to prevent a potential 
ignition source inside a fuel tank, which, in combination with 
flammable fuel vapors, could result in a fuel tank explosion.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 26, 
2007.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on 
this proposed AD.
     DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow 
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your 
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401, 
Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: (202) 493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the 
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. 
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Contact Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), P.O. Box 
343--CEP 12.225, Sao Jose dos Campos--SP, Brazil, for service 
information identified in this proposed AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, 
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 
227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to submit any relevant written data, views, or 
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address 
listed in the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number ``FAA-2006-
26685; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-200-AD'' at the beginning of your 
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, 
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will 
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the 
proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will 
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA 
personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search function of 
that Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our 
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment (or 
signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, 
etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the 
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you 
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.

Examining the Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management Facility office 
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-
5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the DOT 
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 
available in the AD docket shortly after the Docket Management System 
receives them.

Discussion

    The FAA has examined the underlying safety issues involved in fuel 
tank explosions on several large transport airplanes, including the 
adequacy of existing regulations, the service history of airplanes 
subject to those regulations, and existing maintenance practices for 
fuel tank systems. As a result of those findings, we issued a 
regulation titled ``Transport Airplane Fuel Tank System Design Review, 
Flammability Reduction and Maintenance and Inspection Requirements'' 
(66 FR 23086, May 7, 2001). In addition to new airworthiness standards 
for transport airplanes and new maintenance requirements, this rule 
included Special Federal Aviation Regulation No. 88 (``SFAR 88,'' 
Amendment 21-78, and subsequent Amendments 21-82 and 21-83).
    Among other actions, SFAR 88 requires certain type design (i.e., 
type certificate (TC) and supplemental type certificate (STC)) holders 
to substantiate that their fuel tank systems can prevent ignition 
sources in the fuel tanks. This requirement applies to type design 
holders for large turbine-powered transport airplanes and for 
subsequent modifications to those airplanes. It requires them to 
perform design reviews and to develop design changes and maintenance 
procedures if their designs do not meet the new fuel tank safety 
standards. As explained in the preamble to the rule, we intended to 
adopt airworthiness directives to mandate any changes found necessary 
to address unsafe conditions identified as a result of these reviews.
    In evaluating these design reviews, we have established four 
criteria intended to define the unsafe conditions associated with fuel 
tank systems that require corrective actions. The percentage of 
operating time during which fuel tanks are exposed to flammable 
conditions is one of these criteria. The other three criteria address 
the failure types under evaluation: Single failures, single failures in 
combination with a latent condition(s), and in-service failure 
experience. For all four criteria, the evaluations included 
consideration of previous actions taken that may mitigate the need for 
further action.
    The Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA) has issued a regulation that 
is similar to SFAR 88. (The JAA is an associated body of the European 
Civil Aviation Conference (ECAC) representing the civil aviation 
regulatory authorities of a number of European States who have agreed 
to co-operate in developing and implementing common safety regulatory 
standards and procedures.) Under this regulation, the JAA stated that 
all members of the ECAC that hold type certificates for transport 
category airplanes are required to conduct a design review against 
explosion risks.
    We have determined that the actions identified in this proposed AD 
are necessary to reduce the potential of ignition sources inside fuel 
tanks, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result 
in a fuel tank explosion.

Relevant Service Information

    EMBRAER has issued Service Bulletin 145LEG-28-0022, dated February 
17, 2005. The service bulletin describes procedures for modifying the 
forward and aft auxiliary fuel tanks. The modification includes, but is 
not limited to, re-routing the harnesses at the forward and aft fuel 
tanks; installing bonding jumpers, and electrical bonding of the 
refueling and vent lines at the forward fuel tanks and the solenoid 
valves of the aft fuel tanks; and

[[Page 77631]]

installing new support assemblies of the harnesses of the aft fuel 
tanks. Accomplishing the actions specified in the service information 
is intended to adequately address the unsafe condition. The 
Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avi[ccedil][atilde]co Civil (ANAC) mandated 
the service information and issued Brazilian airworthiness directive 
2006-07-03, effective August 23, 2006, to ensure the continued 
airworthiness of these airplanes in Brazil.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This airplane model is manufactured in Brazil and is type 
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the ANAC has kept the FAA informed 
of the situation described above. We have examined the ANAC's findings, 
evaluated all pertinent information, and determined that we need to 
issue an AD for airplanes of this type design that are certificated for 
operation in the United States.
    Therefore, we are proposing this AD, which would require 
accomplishing the actions specified in the service information 
described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    This proposed AD would affect about 27 airplanes of U.S. registry. 
The proposed modifications would take about 20 work hours per airplane, 
at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts would 
cost $2,200 per airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of 
the proposed modifications for U.S. operators is $102,600, or $3,800 
per airplane.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to 
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the 
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in 
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General 
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with 
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing 
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator 
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within 
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition 
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this 
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism 
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not 
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship 
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed 
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies 
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or 
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria 
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to 
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the 
ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the 
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.


Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by 
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-2006-
26685; Directorate Identifier 2006-NM-200-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The FAA must receive comments on this AD action by January 26, 
2007.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all EMBRAER Model EMB-135BJ airplanes, 
certificated in any category.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a report of sparks due to chafing between 
the harnesses of the forward and aft auxiliary fuel tanks, between 
certain harnesses attached to the aircraft structure, or between 
certain harnesses attached to certain mechanical components. We are 
issuing this AD to prevent a potential ignition source inside a fuel 
tank, which, in combination with flammable fuel vapors, could result in 
a fuel tank explosion.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD 
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions 
have already been done.

Modifications

    (f) Within 5,000 flight hours after the effective date of this AD: 
Accomplish the modifications specified in paragraphs (f)(1) and (f)(2) 
of this AD by doing all the applicable actions in accordance with the 
Accomplishment Instructions of EMBRAER Service Bulletin 145LEG-28-0022, 
dated February 17, 2005.
    (1) Modify the forward auxiliary fuel tank.
    (2) Modify the aft auxiliary fuel tanks on the left and right 
sides.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g)(1) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport 
Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this 
AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 
39.19.
    (2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.  39.19 
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the appropriate 
principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding 
District Office.

Related Information

    (h) Brazilian airworthiness directive 2006-07-03, effective August 
23, 2006, also addresses the subject of this AD.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 19, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-22115 Filed 12-26-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.