Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado; Modification of the Handling Regulation for Area No. 2, 77583-77586 [06-9897]
Download as PDF
77583
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 71, No. 248
Wednesday, December 27, 2006
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 948
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
[Docket No. AMS–FV–06–0182; FV06–948–
2 IFR]
7 CFR Part 800
Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado;
Modification of the Handling
Regulation for Area No. 2
RIN: 0580–AA90
United States Standards for Soybeans
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In a final rule published in
the Federal Register on September 6,
2006, we amended regulations
concerning the United States Standards
for Soybeans. The final rule contained
an error in the rule portion;
inadvertently, footnote reference
numbers were left off of Table 17 in 7
CFR 800.86. This document corrects
that error.
DATES: Effective Date: September 1,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Becca Riese at GIPSA, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC, 20250–3630;
Telephone (202) 720–4116; Fax Number
(202) 720–7883; e-mail
Rebecca.A.Riese@usda.gov.
In a final
rule published in the Federal Register
on September 6, 2006, (71 FR 52403–
52406) we amended regulations
concerning the United States Standards
for Soybeans, including Table 17 in 7
CFR 800.86. Inadvertently, footnote
reference numbers were left off of Table
17 in 7 CFR 800.86.
In rule FR Doc. E6–14719 published
on September 6, 2006, (71 FR 52403–
52406) make the following correction.
On page 52405, in Table 17, in the first
column, insert:
(1) Footnote reference number 1
immediately following ‘‘U.S. No. 3’’ and
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
17:07 Dec 26, 2006
James E. Link,
Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. E6–22044 Filed 12–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
VerDate Aug<31>2005
(2) footnote reference number 2
immediately following ‘‘U.S. No. 4.’’
Jkt 211001
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule modifies the grade
and maturity requirements for potatoes
handled under the Colorado potato
marketing order, Area No. 2. The
marketing order regulates the handling
of Irish potatoes grown in Colorado and
is administered locally by the Colorado
Potato Administrative Committee, Area
No. 2 (Committee). This rule relaxes the
minimum grade requirement from U.S.
No. 1 grade to U.S. Commercial grade
for all Area No. 2 potato varieties, other
than round, red-skinned varieties,
measuring from 1 1⁄2-inch minimum
diameter to 2 1⁄4-inch maximum
diameter (size B), and 1-inch minimum
diameter to 1 3⁄4-inch maximum
diameter. This rule also changes from
August 25 to August 1 of each year the
date minimum maturity requirements
are implemented. These changes are
intended to facilitate the handling and
marketing of Colorado Area No. 2
potatoes.
DATES: Effective December 28, 2006;
comments received by February 26,
2007 will be considered prior to
issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be
sent to the Docket Clerk, Marketing
Order Administration Branch, Fruit and
Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237,
Washington, DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202)
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
720–8938; e-mail:
moab.docketclerk@usda.gov; or Internet:
https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the docket
number and the date and page number
of this issue of the Federal Register and
will be made available for public
inspection in the Office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at: https://
www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Teresa Hutchinson or Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326–
2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or E-mail:
Teresa.Hutchinson@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 97 and Marketing Order No. 948,
both as amended (7 CFR part 948),
regulating the handling of Irish potatoes
grown in Colorado, hereinafter referred
to as the ‘‘order.’’ The order is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
§ 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any handler
subject to an order may file with USDA
a petition stating that the order, any
provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is
not in accordance with law and request
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
77584
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 27, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
a modification of the order or to be
exempted therefrom. A handler is
afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule changes the minimum grade
requirement for certain potatoes
handled under the order and also
changes the minimum maturity
requirement implementation date.
Specifically, this rule changes the
minimum grade requirement from U.S.
No. 1 grade to U.S. Commercial grade
for all varieties of Area No. 2 potatoes,
other than round, red-skinned potatoes,
measuring from 1 1⁄2-inch minimum
diameter to 2 1⁄4-inch maximum
diameter (size B), and from 1-inch
minimum diameter to 1 3⁄4-inch
maximum diameter. Furthermore, this
rule changes the implementation date
for the minimum maturity requirement
from August 25 to August 1 of each
year. These changes were recommended
by the Committee at a meeting held on
August 10, 2006.
Section 948.22 authorizes the
issuance of grade, size, quality,
maturity, pack, and container
regulations for potatoes grown in the
production area. Section 948.21 further
authorizes the modification, suspension,
or termination of regulations issued
pursuant to § 948.22.
Section 948.40 provides that
whenever the handling of potatoes is
regulated pursuant to §§ 948.20 through
948.24, such potatoes must be inspected
by the Federal-State Inspection Service,
and certified as meeting the applicable
requirements of such regulations.
Under the order, the State of Colorado
is divided into three areas of regulation
for marketing order purposes. These
include: Area 1, commonly known as
the Western Slope and consisting of
Routt, Eagle, Pitkin, Gunnison,
Hinsdale, La Plata Counties, and all
counties west thereof; Area 2,
commonly known as San Luis Valley,
consists of Sanguache, Huerfano, Las
Animas, Mineral, Archuleta Counties,
and all counties south thereof; and, Area
3, which consists of the remaining
counties in the State of Colorado not
included in Area 1 or 2. The order
currently regulates production in Areas
2 and 3 only; regulation for Area 1 is
currently not active. Grade, size, and
maturity regulations specific to the
handling of potatoes grown in Area No.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 26, 2006
Jkt 211001
2 are contained in § 948.386 of the
order. For many years, consumer
demand for small fresh market potatoes
was relatively soft in comparison to
demand for larger size potatoes. Size B
and smaller potatoes were often
discarded or fed to livestock. Grade and
size regulations were developed to keep
lower quality small potatoes out of the
fresh market. At that time, the
Committee believed that small potatoes,
sold at a great discount, eroded the price
for large potatoes. By requiring small
potatoes to grade U.S. No. 1 or better,
the Committee believed that high
quality small potatoes would not have
an adverse affect on the market for
larger potatoes.
Recently, however, demand has
increased for small potatoes, which
often command premium prices
compared to larger size A potatoes (1 7⁄8inch and larger). With the growing
demand for small potatoes, producers
and handlers are concerned that they
will not be able to supply this market
if only U.S. No. 1 or better grade can be
shipped under the order. The Colorado
Area No. 2 potato industry has received
requests from customers for additional
small potatoes that grade U.S.
Commercial or better. This action would
better assist Area No. 2 handlers in
meeting their buyers’ needs.
Committee statistics show that
approximately 62 percent of the entire
potato crop in Area No. 2 grades U.S.
No. 1 or better. However, the percentage
of Size B and smaller potatoes meeting
U.S. No. 1 grade is only about 50
percent. The reason for the lower
percentage of smaller potatoes is that
potato defects are scored based on the
percentage of surface area affected on
the individual potato. Because Size B
and smaller potatoes have less surface,
any defect inspected comprises a larger
part of the total surface being scored
relative to larger sized potatoes. For
example, a cut on a large potato may not
affect a large enough surface area to be
a scorable defect, but the same size cut
would be scorable on a smaller potato.
Under such circumstances, it would be
much harder for a small potato to meet
the U.S. No. 1 grade than it would for
a large potato. The U.S. Commercial
grade allows a slightly higher
percentage of total defects than the U.S.
No. 1 grade.
By changing the grade requirement to
allow size B potatoes and potatoes
measuring from 1-inch minimum
diameter to 1 3⁄4-inch maximum
diameter (commonly referred to as
‘‘creamers’’ by the potato industry) to
meet U.S. Commercial grade or better,
the Committee believes more small
potatoes would be available to meet
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
increasing demand, and thus help
increase returns to producers. Not only
would more small potatoes enter the
market, small potatoes typically sell for
a premium price in today’s marketplace.
This change would not affect round,
red-skinned potato varieties in the size
B and 1-inch minimum diameter to 1 3⁄4inch maximum diameter size, which
would continue to meet U.S. No. 1 grade
or better. The majority of round, redskinned potato varieties produced in
Area No. 2 supply the food service or
restaurant market. This market demands
high quality (U.S. No. 1 or better) round,
red-skinned potatoes. Therefore, the
Committee recommends that the grade
requirement for varieties of round, redskinned potatoes in these size categories
remain U.S. No. 1 grade or better.
The Committee believes that by
allowing small potatoes to meet the
more relaxed U.S. Commercial grade
instead of U.S. No. 1 grade, available
volume for sale into the fresh market
could increase by about 23 percent.
Although facing an increasing
demand, the market for small potatoes
is a minor segment of the market served
by the Area No. 2 production area. As
a consequence, the Committee believes
that the smaller potatoes do not compete
directly with the predominant large
potatoes produced in this area, and that
the relaxation of the grade requirement
would not adversely effect the overall
Area No. 2 potato market.
This rule also changes the minimum
maturity requirement implementation
date from August 25 to August 1. The
specified ending date of October 31 for
the minimum maturity requirement
remains unchanged, as do the actual
minimum maturity requirements that
U.S. No. 2 grade potatoes are not more
than ‘‘moderately skinned’’ and that all
other grades are not more than ‘‘slightly
skinned’’ (as defined in the U.S.
Standards for Potatoes).
The Committee recommended that the
implementation date be moved to
August 1 due to the increased use of
early maturing potato varieties in this
area of Colorado and earlier harvest
requirements. Since the skin on most
potato varieties has not substantially
‘‘set’’, or toughened, early in the season,
potato skins have a tendency to more
easily scrape off during harvest and the
subsequent handling and packing
process. By having the maturity
requirements in place at the beginning
of harvest, there is added assurance that
a quality product will reach the
consumer.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 27, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of
this action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order
that small businesses will not be unduly
or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 80 handlers
of Colorado Area No. 2 potatoes subject
to regulation under the order and
approximately 200 producers in the
regulated production area. Small
agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration (13
CFR 121.201) as those having annual
receipts of less than $6,500,000, and
small agricultural producers are defined
as those having annual receipts of less
than $750,000.
During the 2005–2006 marketing year,
17,213,202 hundredweight of Colorado
Area No. 2 potatoes were inspected
under the order and sold into the fresh
market. Based on an estimated average
f.o.b. price of $11.45 per
hundredweight, the Committee
estimates that 73 Area No. 2 handlers,
or about 91 percent, had annual receipts
of less than $6,500,000. In view of the
foregoing, the majority of Colorado Area
No. 2 potato handlers may be classified
as small entities.
In addition, based on information
provided by the National Agricultural
Statistics Service, the average producer
price for Colorado fall potatoes for 2005
was $9.25 per hundredweight. The
average annual fresh potato revenue for
each of the 200 Colorado Area No. 2
potato producers is therefore calculated
to be approximately $796,112.
Consequently, on average, the majority
of the Area No. 2 Colorado potato
producers may not be classified as small
entities.
Excluding round, red-skinned potato
varieties, this rule relaxes the minimum
grade requirement from U.S. No. 1 grade
to U.S. Commercial grade for Area No.
2 potatoes measuring from 1 1⁄2-inch
minimum diameter to 2 1⁄4-inch
maximum diameter (size B), and 1-inch
minimum diameter to 1 3⁄4-inch
maximum diameter. This rule also
changes from August 25 to August 1 of
each year the date minimum maturity
requirements are implemented.
Authority for this action is contained in
§§ 948.21, 948.22, 948.40, and 948.386.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 26, 2006
Jkt 211001
Since the grade relaxation is expected
to benefit producers, handlers and
consumers, any potential impact from
this action would be positive. By
allowing these small potatoes to meet
U.S. Commercial grade or better, a
potentially greater quantity of potatoes
will meet the order’s handling
regulation. This is expected to translate
into an increased market for small
potatoes and thus greater returns for
handlers and producers and more
product choice for consumers. Further,
small potatoes are a minor segment of
the potato market served by the Area
No. 2 production area. As such, the
Committee believes that small potatoes
do not compete directly with most of
the potatoes produced in this area and
that the grade requirement relaxation
will not adversely effect the overall Area
No. 2 potato market.
Based on Committee records, roughly
half of Area No. 2 handlers ship size B
and smaller potatoes. Committee
records also indicate that during the
2004–2005 fiscal period approximately
165,000 hundredweight (less than 1
percent of the total shipments) of size B
and smaller were inspected and
shipped. As a result of this rule, the
Committee estimates that the marketable
supply of size B and smaller potatoes
will increase by 23 percent and add
37,950 hundredweight to the marketable
supply of Area No. 2 potatoes.
As previously noted, this relaxation
does not affect round, red-skinned
potatoes in the same size categories.
These potatoes will continue to packout as U.S. No. 1 grade or better to
satisfy the quality conscious food
service and restaurant markets.
The action changing the minimum
maturity requirement implementation
date to August 1 merely updates the
regulations so that they are in-line with
current cultural practices. Thus, any
impact from this change on the
producers, handlers, and consumers of
Colorado potatoes is expected to be
positive since assurance is being added
that quality product—a product without
undue skinning—will be packed and
shipped into the market. The Committee
supports the concept that a quality
product promotes consumer confidence,
thereby helping to protect producer
returns.
After discussing possible alternatives
to this rule, the Committee determined
that a relaxation in the grade
requirement to U.S. Commercial grade
or better for certain small potatoes
would sufficiently meet the industry’s
current needs. The relaxation in the
grade requirement for the affected small
potatoes is expected to provide the
greatest benefit to the industry by
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
77585
augmenting the developing market for
these potatoes and thereby increasing
producer returns. During its
deliberations, the Committee also
considered relaxing the grade
requirement for small, round, redskinned potato varieties. However, food
service and restaurant market segments
have a preference for round, redskinned potatoes and demand high
quality potatoes (U.S. No. 1 grade or
better). The Committee, therefore, found
that there were no other viable
alternatives for the grade change except
as recommended. Lastly, the maturity
requirement implementation date
change merely brings the regulations inline with current cultural practices, and
therefore, the Committee did not
consider further alternatives to this
recommended change.
This rule will not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
potato handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. In addition, USDA has
not identified any relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Committee’s meeting was
widely publicized throughout the
Colorado potato industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the August 10,
2006, meeting was a public meeting and
all entities, both large and small, were
able to express their views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit information on the regulatory
and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
fv/moab.html. Any questions about the
compliance guide should be sent to Jay
Guerber at the previously mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on a
modification of the grade and maturity
requirement prescribed under the
Colorado potato marketing order. Any
comments received will be considered
prior to the finalization of this rule.
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
77586
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 248 / Wednesday, December 27, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
Committee’s recommendation, and
other information, it is hereby found
that this interim final rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to
effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined upon good cause
that it is impracticable, unnecessary,
and contrary to the public interest to
give preliminary notice prior to putting
this rule into effect and that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) Handlers are already
shipping potatoes from the 2006–2007
crop and want to take advantage of the
grade relaxation aspect of this rule as
soon as possible; (2) handlers are aware
of this rule, which was recommended at
a public meeting; and (3) this rule
provides a 60-day comment period and
any additional comments received will
be considered prior to finalization of
this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 948
Marketing agreements, Potatoes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 948 is amended as
follows:
I
PART 948—IRISH POTATOES GROWN
IN COLORADO
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 948 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. In § 948.386, paragraphs (a)(3) and
(a)(4), and the introductory text of
paragraph (b) are revised to read as
follows:
I
§ 948.386
Handling regulation.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(3) 1 1⁄2-inch minimum to 2 1⁄4-inch
maximum diameter (Size B). U.S.
Commercial grade or better: Provided,
That round, red-skinned varieties shall
grade U.S. No. 1 or better.
(4) 1-inch minimum diameter to 1 3⁄4inch maximum diameter. U.S.
Commercial grade or better: Provided,
That round, red-skinned varieties shall
grade U.S. No. 1 or better.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Maturity (skinning) requirements.
From August 1 through October 31 shall
be:
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 26, 2006
Jkt 211001
Dated: December 21, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 06–9897 Filed 12–21–06; 4:59 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
RIN 3150–AH98
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks: HI–STORM 100 Revision 3;
Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is withdrawing a
direct final rule that would have revised
the Holtec International HI–STORM 100
cask system listing within the ‘‘List of
Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks’’ to
include Amendment No. 3 to the
Certificate of Compliance. The NRC is
taking this action because it has
received significant adverse comments
in response to the direct final rule.
These significant adverse comments
shall be considered as comments to the
companion proposed rule that was
published concurrently with the direct
final rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jayne M. McCausland, Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555, telephone (301) 415–6219 (email: jmm2@nrc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 16, 2006 (71 FR 60659), the
NRC published in the Federal Register
a direct final rule amending its
regulations in 10 CFR 72.214 to revise
the Holtec International HI–STORM 100
cask system listing within the ‘‘List of
Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks’’ to
include Amendment No. 3 to the
Certificate of Compliance Number 1014
(CoC No. 1014). Amendment No. 3
modifies the present cask system design
by revising: Technical Specification
(TS) 3.1.3 to eliminate cooling of the
Multi-Purpose Canister (MPC) cavity
prior to reflood with water, as part of
cask unloading operations; TS 3.3.1 to
allow linear interpolation between
minimal soluble boron concentrations,
for certain fuel enrichments in the
MPC–32/32F; Appendix B, Section 1, to
make modifications to the definitions of
fuel debris, damaged fuel assembly, and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
non-fuel hardware; and Appendix B,
Section 2, to permit the storage of
pressurized water reactor fuel
assemblies with annular fuel pellets in
the top and bottom 12 inches of the
active fuel length. Amendment No. 3
also revises CoC No. 1014 to incorporate
minor editorial corrections. The direct
final rule was to become effective on
January 2, 2007. The NRC also
concurrently published a companion
proposed rule on October 16, 2006 (71
FR 60672).
In the direct final rule, NRC stated
that if any significant adverse comments
were received, a notice of timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule
would be published in the Federal
Register and the direct final rule would
not take effect.
The NRC received significant adverse
comments on the direct final rule;
therefore, the NRC is withdrawing the
direct final rule. These significant
adverse comments shall be considered
as comments to the companion
proposed rule that was published
concurrently with the direct final rule.
The NRC will not initiate a second
comment period on the companion
proposed rule.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 14th day
of December, 2006.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Luis A. Reyes,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. E6–22109 Filed 12–26–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26675; Directorate
Identifier 2006–NM–203–AD; Amendment
39–14864; AD 2006–26–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 777–200 and –300 Series
Airplanes Equipped with Rolls-Royce
Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 777–200 and –300 series
airplanes equipped with Rolls-Royce
engines. This AD requires repetitive
inspections to detect cracks of the outer
V-blades of the thrust reverser, and
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 248 (Wednesday, December 27, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77583-77586]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9897]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 948
[Docket No. AMS-FV-06-0182; FV06-948-2 IFR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Colorado; Modification of the Handling
Regulation for Area No. 2
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule modifies the grade and maturity requirements for
potatoes handled under the Colorado potato marketing order, Area No. 2.
The marketing order regulates the handling of Irish potatoes grown in
Colorado and is administered locally by the Colorado Potato
Administrative Committee, Area No. 2 (Committee). This rule relaxes the
minimum grade requirement from U.S. No. 1 grade to U.S. Commercial
grade for all Area No. 2 potato varieties, other than round, red-
skinned varieties, measuring from 1 \1/2\-inch minimum diameter to 2
\1/4\-inch maximum diameter (size B), and 1-inch minimum diameter to 1
\3/4\-inch maximum diameter. This rule also changes from August 25 to
August 1 of each year the date minimum maturity requirements are
implemented. These changes are intended to facilitate the handling and
marketing of Colorado Area No. 2 potatoes.
DATES: Effective December 28, 2006; comments received by February 26,
2007 will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this rule. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC
20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; e-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments should reference the
docket number and the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office
of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be viewed at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Hutchinson or Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-
2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or E-mail: Teresa.Hutchinson@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber, Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-
2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or E-mail: Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement No. 97 and Marketing Order No. 948, both as amended (7 CFR
part 948), regulating the handling of Irish potatoes grown in Colorado,
hereinafter referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order 12866.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under Sec. 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request
[[Page 77584]]
a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. A handler is
afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any district in which the
handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule changes the minimum grade requirement for certain
potatoes handled under the order and also changes the minimum maturity
requirement implementation date. Specifically, this rule changes the
minimum grade requirement from U.S. No. 1 grade to U.S. Commercial
grade for all varieties of Area No. 2 potatoes, other than round, red-
skinned potatoes, measuring from 1 \1/2\-inch minimum diameter to 2 \1/
4\-inch maximum diameter (size B), and from 1-inch minimum diameter to
1 \3/4\-inch maximum diameter. Furthermore, this rule changes the
implementation date for the minimum maturity requirement from August 25
to August 1 of each year. These changes were recommended by the
Committee at a meeting held on August 10, 2006.
Section 948.22 authorizes the issuance of grade, size, quality,
maturity, pack, and container regulations for potatoes grown in the
production area. Section 948.21 further authorizes the modification,
suspension, or termination of regulations issued pursuant to Sec.
948.22.
Section 948.40 provides that whenever the handling of potatoes is
regulated pursuant to Sec. Sec. 948.20 through 948.24, such potatoes
must be inspected by the Federal-State Inspection Service, and
certified as meeting the applicable requirements of such regulations.
Under the order, the State of Colorado is divided into three areas
of regulation for marketing order purposes. These include: Area 1,
commonly known as the Western Slope and consisting of Routt, Eagle,
Pitkin, Gunnison, Hinsdale, La Plata Counties, and all counties west
thereof; Area 2, commonly known as San Luis Valley, consists of
Sanguache, Huerfano, Las Animas, Mineral, Archuleta Counties, and all
counties south thereof; and, Area 3, which consists of the remaining
counties in the State of Colorado not included in Area 1 or 2. The
order currently regulates production in Areas 2 and 3 only; regulation
for Area 1 is currently not active. Grade, size, and maturity
regulations specific to the handling of potatoes grown in Area No. 2
are contained in Sec. 948.386 of the order. For many years, consumer
demand for small fresh market potatoes was relatively soft in
comparison to demand for larger size potatoes. Size B and smaller
potatoes were often discarded or fed to livestock. Grade and size
regulations were developed to keep lower quality small potatoes out of
the fresh market. At that time, the Committee believed that small
potatoes, sold at a great discount, eroded the price for large
potatoes. By requiring small potatoes to grade U.S. No. 1 or better,
the Committee believed that high quality small potatoes would not have
an adverse affect on the market for larger potatoes.
Recently, however, demand has increased for small potatoes, which
often command premium prices compared to larger size A potatoes (1 \7/
8\-inch and larger). With the growing demand for small potatoes,
producers and handlers are concerned that they will not be able to
supply this market if only U.S. No. 1 or better grade can be shipped
under the order. The Colorado Area No. 2 potato industry has received
requests from customers for additional small potatoes that grade U.S.
Commercial or better. This action would better assist Area No. 2
handlers in meeting their buyers' needs.
Committee statistics show that approximately 62 percent of the
entire potato crop in Area No. 2 grades U.S. No. 1 or better. However,
the percentage of Size B and smaller potatoes meeting U.S. No. 1 grade
is only about 50 percent. The reason for the lower percentage of
smaller potatoes is that potato defects are scored based on the
percentage of surface area affected on the individual potato. Because
Size B and smaller potatoes have less surface, any defect inspected
comprises a larger part of the total surface being scored relative to
larger sized potatoes. For example, a cut on a large potato may not
affect a large enough surface area to be a scorable defect, but the
same size cut would be scorable on a smaller potato. Under such
circumstances, it would be much harder for a small potato to meet the
U.S. No. 1 grade than it would for a large potato. The U.S. Commercial
grade allows a slightly higher percentage of total defects than the
U.S. No. 1 grade.
By changing the grade requirement to allow size B potatoes and
potatoes measuring from 1-inch minimum diameter to 1 \3/4\-inch maximum
diameter (commonly referred to as ``creamers'' by the potato industry)
to meet U.S. Commercial grade or better, the Committee believes more
small potatoes would be available to meet increasing demand, and thus
help increase returns to producers. Not only would more small potatoes
enter the market, small potatoes typically sell for a premium price in
today's marketplace. This change would not affect round, red-skinned
potato varieties in the size B and 1-inch minimum diameter to 1 \3/4\-
inch maximum diameter size, which would continue to meet U.S. No. 1
grade or better. The majority of round, red-skinned potato varieties
produced in Area No. 2 supply the food service or restaurant market.
This market demands high quality (U.S. No. 1 or better) round, red-
skinned potatoes. Therefore, the Committee recommends that the grade
requirement for varieties of round, red-skinned potatoes in these size
categories remain U.S. No. 1 grade or better.
The Committee believes that by allowing small potatoes to meet the
more relaxed U.S. Commercial grade instead of U.S. No. 1 grade,
available volume for sale into the fresh market could increase by about
23 percent.
Although facing an increasing demand, the market for small potatoes
is a minor segment of the market served by the Area No. 2 production
area. As a consequence, the Committee believes that the smaller
potatoes do not compete directly with the predominant large potatoes
produced in this area, and that the relaxation of the grade requirement
would not adversely effect the overall Area No. 2 potato market.
This rule also changes the minimum maturity requirement
implementation date from August 25 to August 1. The specified ending
date of October 31 for the minimum maturity requirement remains
unchanged, as do the actual minimum maturity requirements that U.S. No.
2 grade potatoes are not more than ``moderately skinned'' and that all
other grades are not more than ``slightly skinned'' (as defined in the
U.S. Standards for Potatoes).
The Committee recommended that the implementation date be moved to
August 1 due to the increased use of early maturing potato varieties in
this area of Colorado and earlier harvest requirements. Since the skin
on most potato varieties has not substantially ``set'', or toughened,
early in the season, potato skins have a tendency to more easily scrape
off during harvest and the subsequent handling and packing process. By
having the maturity requirements in place at the beginning of harvest,
there is added assurance that a quality product will reach the
consumer.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA), the
[[Page 77585]]
Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact
of this action on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
business subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf. Thus, both statutes have small
entity orientation and compatibility.
There are approximately 80 handlers of Colorado Area No. 2 potatoes
subject to regulation under the order and approximately 200 producers
in the regulated production area. Small agricultural service firms are
defined by the Small Business Administration (13 CFR 121.201) as those
having annual receipts of less than $6,500,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those having annual receipts of less than
$750,000.
During the 2005-2006 marketing year, 17,213,202 hundredweight of
Colorado Area No. 2 potatoes were inspected under the order and sold
into the fresh market. Based on an estimated average f.o.b. price of
$11.45 per hundredweight, the Committee estimates that 73 Area No. 2
handlers, or about 91 percent, had annual receipts of less than
$6,500,000. In view of the foregoing, the majority of Colorado Area No.
2 potato handlers may be classified as small entities.
In addition, based on information provided by the National
Agricultural Statistics Service, the average producer price for
Colorado fall potatoes for 2005 was $9.25 per hundredweight. The
average annual fresh potato revenue for each of the 200 Colorado Area
No. 2 potato producers is therefore calculated to be approximately
$796,112. Consequently, on average, the majority of the Area No. 2
Colorado potato producers may not be classified as small entities.
Excluding round, red-skinned potato varieties, this rule relaxes
the minimum grade requirement from U.S. No. 1 grade to U.S. Commercial
grade for Area No. 2 potatoes measuring from 1 \1/2\-inch minimum
diameter to 2 \1/4\-inch maximum diameter (size B), and 1-inch minimum
diameter to 1 \3/4\-inch maximum diameter. This rule also changes from
August 25 to August 1 of each year the date minimum maturity
requirements are implemented. Authority for this action is contained in
Sec. Sec. 948.21, 948.22, 948.40, and 948.386.
Since the grade relaxation is expected to benefit producers,
handlers and consumers, any potential impact from this action would be
positive. By allowing these small potatoes to meet U.S. Commercial
grade or better, a potentially greater quantity of potatoes will meet
the order's handling regulation. This is expected to translate into an
increased market for small potatoes and thus greater returns for
handlers and producers and more product choice for consumers. Further,
small potatoes are a minor segment of the potato market served by the
Area No. 2 production area. As such, the Committee believes that small
potatoes do not compete directly with most of the potatoes produced in
this area and that the grade requirement relaxation will not adversely
effect the overall Area No. 2 potato market.
Based on Committee records, roughly half of Area No. 2 handlers
ship size B and smaller potatoes. Committee records also indicate that
during the 2004-2005 fiscal period approximately 165,000 hundredweight
(less than 1 percent of the total shipments) of size B and smaller were
inspected and shipped. As a result of this rule, the Committee
estimates that the marketable supply of size B and smaller potatoes
will increase by 23 percent and add 37,950 hundredweight to the
marketable supply of Area No. 2 potatoes.
As previously noted, this relaxation does not affect round, red-
skinned potatoes in the same size categories. These potatoes will
continue to pack-out as U.S. No. 1 grade or better to satisfy the
quality conscious food service and restaurant markets.
The action changing the minimum maturity requirement implementation
date to August 1 merely updates the regulations so that they are in-
line with current cultural practices. Thus, any impact from this change
on the producers, handlers, and consumers of Colorado potatoes is
expected to be positive since assurance is being added that quality
product--a product without undue skinning--will be packed and shipped
into the market. The Committee supports the concept that a quality
product promotes consumer confidence, thereby helping to protect
producer returns.
After discussing possible alternatives to this rule, the Committee
determined that a relaxation in the grade requirement to U.S.
Commercial grade or better for certain small potatoes would
sufficiently meet the industry's current needs. The relaxation in the
grade requirement for the affected small potatoes is expected to
provide the greatest benefit to the industry by augmenting the
developing market for these potatoes and thereby increasing producer
returns. During its deliberations, the Committee also considered
relaxing the grade requirement for small, round, red-skinned potato
varieties. However, food service and restaurant market segments have a
preference for round, red-skinned potatoes and demand high quality
potatoes (U.S. No. 1 grade or better). The Committee, therefore, found
that there were no other viable alternatives for the grade change
except as recommended. Lastly, the maturity requirement implementation
date change merely brings the regulations in-line with current cultural
practices, and therefore, the Committee did not consider further
alternatives to this recommended change.
This rule will not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large potato handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry
and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized throughout
the Colorado potato industry and all interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in Committee deliberations. Like all
Committee meetings, the August 10, 2006, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small, were able to express their
views on this issue. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit
information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this action
on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/fv/moab.html. Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Jay Guerber at the previously mentioned address
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
This rule invites comments on a modification of the grade and
maturity requirement prescribed under the Colorado potato marketing
order. Any comments received will be considered prior to the
finalization of this rule.
[[Page 77586]]
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the Committee's recommendation, and other information, it is hereby
found that this interim final rule, as hereinafter set forth, will tend
to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good
cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into
effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date
of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) Handlers are already shipping potatoes from the 2006-2007
crop and want to take advantage of the grade relaxation aspect of this
rule as soon as possible; (2) handlers are aware of this rule, which
was recommended at a public meeting; and (3) this rule provides a 60-
day comment period and any additional comments received will be
considered prior to finalization of this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 948
Marketing agreements, Potatoes, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 948 is amended as
follows:
PART 948--IRISH POTATOES GROWN IN COLORADO
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 948 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. In Sec. 948.386, paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4), and the introductory
text of paragraph (b) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 948.386 Handling regulation.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(3) 1 \1/2\-inch minimum to 2 \1/4\-inch maximum diameter (Size B).
U.S. Commercial grade or better: Provided, That round, red-skinned
varieties shall grade U.S. No. 1 or better.
(4) 1-inch minimum diameter to 1 \3/4\-inch maximum diameter. U.S.
Commercial grade or better: Provided, That round, red-skinned varieties
shall grade U.S. No. 1 or better.
* * * * *
(b) Maturity (skinning) requirements. From August 1 through October
31 shall be:
* * * * *
Dated: December 21, 2006.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 06-9897 Filed 12-21-06; 4:59 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P