National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks, 76922-76927 [E6-21975]
Download as PDF
76922
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Name of
non-regulatory
SIP revision
Applicable
geographic area
*
8-Hour Ozone Maintenance
Plan for the Kent and
Queen Anne’s Area.
EPA approval date
*
05/2/06, 05/19/06 ..............
*
*
Kent and Queen Anne’s
Counties.
*
*
December 22, 2006 [Insert
page number where the
document begins].
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PART 81—[AMENDED]
*
Kent and Queen Anne’s Area to read as
follows:
2. Section 81.321 is amended by
revising the ozone table entry for the
I
1. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
I
Additional
explanation
State submittal date
§ 81.321
*
*
Maryland.
*
*
*
MARYLAND—OZONE (8-HOUR STANDARD)
Designation a
Category/ classification
Designated area
Date 1
*
*
*
Date 1
Type
*
Type
*
*
*
*
*
*
Kent and Queen Anne’s Area
Kent County .....................................
Queen Anne’s County .....................
*
December 22, 2006 ........................
December 22, 2006 ........................
*
*
Attainment.
Attainment.
*
a Includes
Indian Country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted.
Action Compact Area, effective date deferred until December 31, 2006.
3 November 22, 2004.
1 This
2 Early
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–21887 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–0093; FRL–8260–7]
RIN 2060–AN10
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface
Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty
Trucks
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action on amendments to the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Surface Coating of
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
(Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP) which were promulgated on
April 26, 2004, under the authority of
section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act. The
direct final rule amendments provide
the option of including surface coating
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Dec 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
of heavier motor vehicles under this
rule. This action also makes direct final
rule amendments to the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Surface Coating of
Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products
(Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP)
and the National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Surface
Coating of Plastic Parts and Products
(Plastic Parts NESHAP) to maintain
consistency between these rules and the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP.
DATES: The direct final rule is effective
on February 20, 2007 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse
written comment by January 22, 2007 or
by February 5, 2007 if a public hearing
is requested by January 2, 2007. If
adverse comments are received, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register indicating which
amendments, sections, or paragraphs
will become effective and which are
being withdrawn due to adverse
comment. If anyone contacts EPA
requesting to speak at a public hearing,
a public hearing will be held on January
8, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2002–0093. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
will be publicly available only in hard
copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA
West, Room B–102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is
(202) 566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Air and Radiation
Docket is (202) 566–1742.
Note: The EPA Docket Center suffered
damage due to flooding during the last week
of June 2006. The Docket Center is
continuing to operate. However, during the
cleanup, there will be temporary changes to
Docket Center telephone numbers, addresses,
and hours of operation for people who wish
to make hand deliveries or visit the Public
Reading Room to view documents. Consult
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
EPA’s Federal Register notice at 71 FR 38147
(July 5, 2006) or the EPA Web site at
https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm
for current information on docket operations,
locations, and telephone numbers. The
Docket Center’s mailing address for U.S. mail
and the procedure for submitting comments
to www.regulations.gov are not affected by
the flooding and will remain the same.
Public Hearing. If a public hearing is
held, it will be held at 10 a.m. at the
EPA’s Environmental Research Center
Auditorium, Research Triangle Park,
NC, or at an alternate site nearby.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information contact Mr. David
Salman, EPA, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Sector Policies
and Programs Division, Coatings and
Chemicals Group (E143–01), Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone
number (919) 541–0859; fax number
(919) 541–0246; e-mail address:
salman.dave@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulated Entities. Categories and
entities potentially regulated by this
action include:
Category
NAICS *
code
Examples of
potentially
regulated entities
Industry ....
336111
Automobile manufacturing.
Light truck and utility
vehicle manufacturing.
Motor vehicle body
manufacturing.
Heavy duty truck manufacturing.
336112
336211
336120
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
* North
System.
American
Industry
Classification
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this action. To determine
whether your facility is regulated by this
action, you should examine the
applicability criteria of the rule. If you
have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed in the preceding FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
World Wide Web (WWW). In addition
to being available in the docket, an
electronic copy of today’s direct final
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP will also be available on the
WWW through the Technology Transfer
Network (TTN). Following the
Administrator’s signature, a copy of the
NESHAP will be posted on the TTN’s
policy and guidance page for newly
proposed or promulgated rules at
https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/. The
TTN at EPA’s Web site provides
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Dec 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
information and technology exchange in
various areas of air pollution control.
Comments. We are publishing the
direct final rule amendments without
prior proposal because we view the
amendments as noncontroversial and do
not anticipate adverse comments.
However, in the Proposed Rules section
of this Federal Register notice, we are
publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposal to amend the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII),
the Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP
(40 CFR 63, subpart MMMM), and the
Plastic Parts NESHAP (40 CFR 63,
subpart PPPP) if material adverse
comments are filed. Instructions for
submitting comments are provided in
that document. If we receive any
material adverse comments on one or
more distinct amendments, we will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
which provisions will become effective,
and which provisions are being
withdrawn due to material adverse
comment. We will address all public
comments in a subsequent final rule,
should the EPA determine to issue one.
Any of the distinct amendments in
today’s direct final rule for which we do
not receive material adverse comment
will become effective on the previously
mentioned date. We will not institute a
second comment period on the direct
final rule amendments. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at
this time.
Judicial Review. Under section
307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA),
judicial review of the direct final rule
amendments is available only by filing
a petition for review in the United
States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia Circuit by February 20,
2007. Under section 307(d)(7)(B) of the
CAA, only an objection to the direct
final rule amendments that was raised
with reasonable specificity during the
period for public comment can be raised
during judicial review. Moreover, under
section 307(b)(2) of the CAA, the
requirements established by the direct
final rule amendments may not be
challenged separately in any civil or
criminal proceeding brought by EPA to
enforce these requirements.
Outline. The information presented in
this preamble is organized as follows:
I. Background
II. Amendments
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76923
F. Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
J. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
On April 26, 2004, we issued the final
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP (69 FR 22602). The final
NESHAP established standards to
control organic hazardous air pollutant
(HAP) emissions from new and existing
automobile and light-duty truck surface
coating operations. Today’s action
amends the final rule by adding an
option to include the coating of heavier
vehicle bodies and parts for heavier
vehicles in the affected source under
this NESHAP. We are also making direct
final rule amendments to the
Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP (40
CFR part 63, subpart MMMM), and the
Plastic Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart PPPP) to maintain consistency
between these rules and the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII).
None of the amendments will have any
discernable effect on the stringency of
the rules.
II. Amendments
The discussion in this section of the
preamble pertains to the Automobiles
and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP (40
CFR part 63, subpart IIII) unless
otherwise noted as applying to the
Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP (40
CFR part 63, subpart MMMM) or the
Plastic Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart PPPP). Each of these rules has
an early 2007 compliance date for
existing sources.
The main focus of the final rule is the
coating of new automobile or new lightduty truck bodies, and body parts for
new automobiles or new light-duty
trucks. The final rule also allows the
owner or operator of an automobile and
light-duty truck coating affected source
to include in that affected source any
coating operation which applies
coatings to parts intended for use in
new automobiles or new light-duty
trucks or as aftermarket repair or
replacement parts for automobiles or
light-duty trucks which would
otherwise be subject to the
Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP (40
CFR part 63, subpart MMMM) or the
Plastic Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
76924
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
subpart PPPP). This makes it possible
for such a facility to demonstrate
compliance with requirements
applicable to all of these activities
within the final rule rather than having
to demonstrate compliance with two or
three rules.
Some automobile and light-duty truck
surface coating facilities also coat
heavier vehicle bodies or body parts for
heavier vehicles. The heavier vehicle
bodies or body parts for heavier vehicles
may be coated using the same
equipment and materials that are used
to coat automobile and light-duty truck
bodies or body parts for automobiles
and light-duty trucks. The final rule
does not currently provide an option for
including the coating of heavier vehicle
bodies or body parts for heavier vehicles
in the automobile and light-duty truck
affected source. Lacking such an option,
a facility which coats automobiles or
light-duty trucks and also coats heavier
vehicle bodies or body parts for heavier
vehicles would be subject to the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII)
and also would be subject to the
Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP (40
CFR part 63, subpart MMMM) or the
Plastic Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart PPPP). Adding the option of
including the coating of heavier vehicle
bodies or body parts for heavier vehicles
in the automobile and light-duty truck
affected source would make it possible
for such a facility to demonstrate
compliance with requirements
applicable to all of these activities
within the final rule rather than having
to demonstrate compliance with two or
three rules.
Some facilities that coat only heavier
vehicle bodies or body parts for heavier
vehicles have paint shops that are
designed and operated in the same
manner as paint shops that are used to
coat automobile and light-duty truck
bodies and body parts for automobiles
and light-duty trucks. The permit
requirements for these heavier vehicle
paint shops are often structured in the
same way as permit requirements for
automobile and light-duty truck paint
shops. The volatile organic compounds
(VOC) compliance demonstration
procedures that are used for these
heavier vehicle paint shops are often the
same as the VOC compliance
demonstration procedures that are used
for automobile and light-duty truck
paint shops and very similar to the HAP
compliance demonstration procedures
in the Automobiles and Light-Duty
Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart IIII). Without the option of
including these heavier vehicle paint
shops under the Automobiles and Light-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Dec 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
Duty Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart IIII), these heavier vehicle paint
shops will have to demonstrate
compliance both with VOC
requirements using automobile and
light-duty truck procedures and HAP
requirements using very different
procedures as specified in the other
NESHAP. Adding the option of
including the coating of heavier vehicle
bodies or body parts for heavier vehicles
in the automobile and light-duty truck
affected source would make it possible
for such a facility to demonstrate
compliance with HAP requirements
using the very similar procedures in the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII).
We, therefore, have amended the final
rule by adding an option to include the
coating of heavier vehicle bodies, body
parts for heavier vehicles, and parts for
heavier vehicles in the affected source
under this NESHAP. The direct final
amendments use the term ‘‘other motor
vehicle’’ which is defined as ‘‘a selfpropelled vehicle designed for
transporting persons or property on a
street or highway that has a gross
vehicle weight rating over 8,500
pounds.’’ The emissions limits in the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP (40 CFR 63, subpart IIII) are
more stringent than the emissions limits
in the Miscellaneous Metal Parts
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
MMMM) and the Plastic Parts NESHAP
(40 CFR part 63, subpart PPPP). As a
result, any heavier vehicle coating
operation that is included in this
NESHAP will be required to achieve the
same or greater organic HAP emission
reduction than it would have been
required to achieve under the other
NESHAP. The first monthly compliance
period for existing sources in the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP begins on April 26, 2007 and
ends on May 31, 2007. The first 12month compliance period for existing
sources in the Miscellaneous Metal
Parts NESHAP begins on January 2,
2007 and ends on February 29, 2008.
The first 12-month compliance period
for existing sources in the Plastic Parts
NESHAP begins on April 19, 2007 and
ends on May 31, 2008. We believe the
earlier start of the first compliance
period for existing sources in the
Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP is
inconsequential, particularly since the
first compliance period for existing
sources in the Automobiles and LightDuty Trucks NESHAP will end sooner
and continuous compliance with the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP will be demonstrated on a
monthly basis as opposed to the 12-
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
month rolling basis used in the other
two rules.
We have amended the Miscellaneous
Metal Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart MMMM) to allow the coating of
metal heavier vehicle bodies, metal
body parts for heavier vehicles, and
metal parts for heavier vehicles to
comply with the Automobiles and
Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR 63,
subpart IIII) in lieu of complying with
the Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP.
We have amended the Plastic Parts
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart PPPP)
to allow the coating of heavier plastic
vehicle bodies, plastic body parts for
heavier vehicles, and plastic parts for
heavier vehicles to comply with the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP (40 CFR 63, subpart IIII) in
lieu of complying with the Plastic Parts
NESHAP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) initially notified EPA that it
considered this action a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ within the meaning
of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Nevertheless, after
reviewing information regarding this
action, OMB waived review of this
action.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden. This
action adds optional provisions to the
final standards. OMB has previously
approved the information collection
requirements contained in the existing
regulations (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII)
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.,
and has assigned OMB control number
2060–0550, EPA ICR No. 2045.02. A
copy of the Information Collection
Request (ICR) may be obtained from Ms.
Susan Auby by mail at the Office of
Environmental Information, Collection
Strategies Division (2822), EPA, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, by e-mail at
auby.susan@epa.gov, or by calling (202)
566–1672. You also may download a
copy from the Internet at https://
www.epa.gov/icr. Include the ICR
number in any correspondence.
Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose
or provide information to or for a
Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop,
acquire, install, and utilize technology
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of
information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of
information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations are listed
in 40 CFR part 9.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
C. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
EPA has determined that it is not
necessary to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis in connection with
the direct final rule amendments.
For purposes of assessing the impacts
of today’s direct final rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A
small business according to Small
Business Administration size standards
for companies identified by NAICS
codes 336111 (automobile
manufacturing) and 336112 (light truck
and utility vehicle manufacturing) with
1,000 or fewer employees; (2) a small
governmental jurisdiction that is a
government of a city, county, town,
school district, or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3)
a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field. Based on the
above definition, there are no small
entities presently engaged in automobile
and light-duty truck surface coating.
After considering the economic
impacts of the final rule on small
entities, EPA has concluded that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This is based
on the observation that the final rule
affects no small entities since none are
engaged in the surface coating of
automobiles and light-duty trucks.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
EPA generally must prepare a written
statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Dec 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures to State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or to the private sector, of $100 million
or more in any 1 year. Before
promulgating a rule for which a written
statement is needed, section 205 of the
UMRA generally requires us to identify
and consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, most cost-effective, or least
burdensome alternative that achieves
the objectives of the rule. The
provisions of section 205 do not apply
when they are inconsistent with
applicable law. Moreover, section 205
allows us to adopt an alternative other
than the least costly, most cost-effective,
or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final
rule an explanation why that alternative
was not adopted. Before EPA establishes
any regulatory requirements that may
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal
governments, it must have developed
under section 203 of the UMRA a small
government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially
affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments
to have meaningful and timely input in
the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal
intergovernmental mandates, and
informing, educating, and advising
small governments on compliance with
the regulatory requirements.
EPA has determined that the direct
final rule amendments do not contain a
Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures of $100 million or more
for State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or the private sector in
any 1 year. The direct final rule
amendments provide the option of
including surface coating of heavier
motor vehicles under this rule and,
therefore, add no additional burden on
sources. Thus, the direct final rule
amendments are not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
the UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), requires EPA to develop an
accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by State
and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have federalism
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have
federalism implications’’ is defined in
the Executive Order to include
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76925
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’
The direct final rule amendments do
not have federalism implications. They
will not have substantial direct effects
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. No
facilities subject to the direct final rule
amendments are owned by State or local
governments. Therefore, State and local
governments will not have any direct
compliance costs resulting from the
direct final rule amendments.
Furthermore, the direct final rule
amendments do not require these
governments to take on any new
responsibilities. Thus, Executive Order
13132 does not apply to the direct final
rule amendments.
F. Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to
ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by
tribal officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ The direct final rule
amendments do not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. They will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
because we are not aware of any Indian
tribal governments or communities
affected by the direct final rule
amendments. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to the direct final
rule amendments.
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) applies to any rule that:
(1) is determined to be ‘‘economically
significant’’ as defined under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that
EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If
the regulatory action meets both criteria,
the Agency must evaluate the
environmental health or safety effects of
the planned rule on children, and
explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
76926
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
and reasonably feasible alternatives
considered by the Agency.
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
as applying only to those regulatory
actions that are based on health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under section 5–501 of the Executive
Order has the potential to influence the
regulation. The direct final rule
amendments are not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because they are
based on technology performance and
not on health or safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
The direct final rule amendments are
not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ as
defined in Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because they are not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
The direct final rule amendments
provide the option of including surface
coating of heavier motor vehicles under
this rule and, therefore, add no
additional burden on sources. We have,
therefore, concluded that the direct final
rule amendments are not likely to have
any adverse energy effects.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995, Public Law No.
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS) in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be
inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. VCS are
technical standards (e.g., materials
specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that
are developed or adopted by VCS
bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to
provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable VCS.
The direct final rule amendments do not
involve technical standards. Therefore,
EPA is not considering the use of any
VCS.
J. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:32 Dec 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing the direct final rule
amendments and other required
information to the United States Senate,
the United States House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the direct final rule
amendments in the Federal Register. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60
days after it is published in the Federal
Register. The direct final rule
amendments are not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The direct
final rule amendments will be effective
on February 20, 2007.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Hazardous
substances, and Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, Title 40, chapter I, part 63 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 63—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
located at a facility which applies
topcoat to new automobile or new lightduty truck bodies or body parts for new
automobiles or new light-duty trucks,
and that is a major source, is located at
a major source, or is part of a major
source of emissions of hazardous air
pollutants (HAP). You are subject to this
subpart if you own or operate a new,
reconstructed, or existing affected
source, as defined in § 63.3082, in
which you choose to include, pursuant
to § 63.3082(c), any coating operations
which apply coatings to new other
motor vehicle bodies or body parts for
new other motor vehicles; parts
intended for use in new automobiles,
new light-duty trucks, or new other
motor vehicles; or aftermarket repair or
replacement parts for automobiles, lightduty trucks, or other motor vehicles;
and the affected source is located at a
facility that is a major source, is located
at a major source, or is part of a major
source of emissions of HAP. A major
source of HAP emissions is any
stationary source or group of stationary
sources located within a contiguous area
and under common control that emits or
has the potential to emit any single HAP
at a rate of 9.07 megagrams (Mg) (10
tons) or more per year or any
combination of HAP at a rate of 22.68
Mg (25 tons) or more per year.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart IIII—[Amended]
4. Section 63.3082 is amended by
revising paragraphs (c) and (e) to read as
follows:
2. Section 63.3080 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 63.3082 What parts of my plant does this
subpart cover?
§ 63.3080
subpart?
*
I
What is the purpose of this
This subpart establishes national
emission standards for hazardous air
pollutants (NESHAP) for facilities
which surface coat new automobile or
new light-duty truck bodies or body
parts for new automobiles or new lightduty trucks. This subpart also
establishes NESHAP for facilities which
surface coat new other motor vehicle
bodies or body parts for new other
motor vehicles which you choose to
include in your affected source pursuant
to § 63.3082(c). This subpart also
establishes requirements to demonstrate
initial and continuous compliance with
the emission limitations.
I 3. Section 63.3081 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 63.3081
Am I subject to this subpart?
*
*
*
*
*
(b) You are subject to this subpart if
you own or operate a new,
reconstructed, or existing affected
source, as defined in § 63.3082, that is
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I
*
*
*
*
(c) In addition, you may choose to
include in your affected source, and
thereby make subject to the
requirements of this subpart, any
coating operations, as defined in
§ 63.3176, which would otherwise be
subject to the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Surface Coating of Miscellaneous
Metal Parts and Products (subpart
MMMM of this part) or the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Surface Coating of Plastic
Parts and Products (subpart PPPP of this
part) which apply coatings to new other
motor vehicle bodies or body parts for
new other motor vehicles, parts
intended for use in new automobiles,
new light-duty trucks, or new other
motor vehicles, or aftermarket repair or
replacement parts for automobiles, lightduty trucks, or other motor vehicles.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) An affected source is a new
affected source if:
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 246 / Friday, December 22, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(1) You commenced its construction
after December 24, 2002; and
(2) The construction is of a
completely new automobile and lightduty truck assembly plant, automobile
and light-duty truck paint shop,
automobile and light-duty truck topcoat
operation, other motor vehicle assembly
plant, other motor vehicle paint shop, or
other motor vehicle topcoat operation
where previously no automobile and
light-duty truck assembly plant,
automobile and light-duty truck
assembly paint shop, or automobile and
light-duty truck assembly topcoat
operation had existed; and
(i) No other motor vehicle assembly
plant, other motor vehicle paint shop, or
other motor vehicle topcoat operation
had existed previously; or
(ii) No previously existing other motor
vehicle assembly plant, other motor
vehicle paint shop, or other motor
vehicle topcoat operation is subject to
this subpart; or
(iii) If the facility was previously not
a major source for HAP, no previously
existing other motor vehicle assembly
plant, other motor vehicle paint shop, or
other motor vehicle topcoat operation is
made part of the affected source under
this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Section 63.3110 is amended by
revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
I
§ 63.3110
submit?
What notifications must I
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
*
17:32 Dec 21, 2006
Jkt 211001
§ 63.3176
subpart?
What definitions apply to this
*
*
*
*
*
Automobile and light-duty truck
assembly plant means a facility which
assembles automobiles or light-duty
trucks, including coating facilities and
processes.
*
*
*
*
*
Other motor vehicle means a selfpropelled vehicle designed for
transporting persons or property on a
street or highway that has a gross
vehicle weight rating over 8,500
pounds. You may choose to make the
coating of other motor vehicles subject
to this subpart pursuant to § 63.3082(c).
Other motor vehicle assembly plant
means a facility which assembles other
motor vehicles, including coating
facilities and processes.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart MMMM—[Amended]
*
*
*
*
(b) You must submit the Initial
Notification required by § 63.9(b) for a
new or reconstructed affected source no
later than 120 days after initial startup
or 120 days after June 25, 2004,
whichever is later. For an existing
affected source, you must submit the
Initial Notification no later than 1 year
after April 26, 2004. Existing sources
that have previously submitted
notifications of applicability of this rule
pursuant to § 112(j) of the CAA are not
required to submit an Initial
Notification under § 63.9(b) except to
identify and describe all additions to the
affected source made pursuant to
§ 63.3082(c). If you elect to include the
surface coating of new other motor
vehicle bodies, body parts for new other
motor vehicles, parts for new other
motor vehicles, or aftermarket repair or
replacement parts for other motor
vehicles in your affected source
pursuant to § 63.3082(c) and your
affected source has an initial startup
before February 20, 2007, then you must
submit an Initial Notification of this
election no later than 120 days after
VerDate Aug<31>2005
initial startup or February 20, 2007,
whichever is later.
*
*
*
*
*
I 6. Section 63.3176 is amended by:
I a. Removing the definition of
‘‘Automobile and/or light-duty truck
assembly plant’’.
I b. Adding in alphabetical order
definitions for ‘‘Automobile and lightduty truck assembly plant,’’ ‘‘Other
motor vehicle,’’ and ‘‘Other motor
vehicle assembly plant’’ to read as
follows:
7. Section 63.3881 is amended by
revising the last sentence of paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
I
§ 63.3881
Am I subject to this subpart?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * * Surface coating operations
on metal parts or products (e.g., parts for
motorcycles or lawnmowers) not
intended for use in automobiles, lightduty trucks, or other motor vehicles as
defined in § 63.3176 cannot be made
part of your affected source under
subpart IIII of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart PPPP—[Amended]
8. Section 63.4481 is amended by
revising the last sentence of paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
I
§ 63.4481
Am I subject to this subpart?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * * Surface coating operations
on plastic parts or products (e.g., parts
for motorcycles or lawnmowers) not
intended for use in automobiles, lightduty trucks, or other motor vehicles as
defined in § 63.3176 cannot be made
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76927
part of your affected source under
subpart IIII of this part.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–21975 Filed 12–21–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0935; FRL–8105–6]
Flucarbazone–sodium; Pesticide
Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a
tolerance for combined residues of
flucarbazone-sodium, 4,5-dihydro-3methoxy-4-methyl-5-oxo-N[[2(trifluoromethoxy)phenyl] sulfonyl1H-1,2,4-triazole 1-carboxamide,
sodium salt and its N-desmethyl
metabolite in or on wheat, forage at 0.30
parts per million (ppm); wheat, grain at
0.01 ppm; wheat, hay at 0.10 ppm; and
wheat, straw at 0.05 ppm; and combined
residues of flucarbazone–sodium and its
metabolites converted to 2(trifluoromethoxy) benzene sulfonamide
and calculated as flucarbazone-sodium
in or on milk at 0.005 ppm; meat and
meat byproducts (excluding liver) of
cattle, goats, hogs, horses, and sheep at
0.01 ppm; and liver of cattle, goats,
hogs, horses, and sheep at 1.5 ppm.
Arysta LifeScience North America
Corporation, 15401 Weston Parkway,
Suite 150, Cary, NC 27513 requested
this tolerance under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 (FQPA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
December 22, 2006. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before February 20, 2007, and
must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0935. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the
docket. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
E:\FR\FM\22DER1.SGM
22DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 246 (Friday, December 22, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76922-76927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21975]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0093; FRL-8260-7]
RIN 2060-AN10
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface
Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action on amendments to the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Surface
Coating of Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks (Automobiles and Light-
Duty Trucks NESHAP) which were promulgated on April 26, 2004, under the
authority of section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act. The direct final rule
amendments provide the option of including surface coating of heavier
motor vehicles under this rule. This action also makes direct final
rule amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products (Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP) and the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Surface Coating of Plastic
Parts and Products (Plastic Parts NESHAP) to maintain consistency
between these rules and the Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP.
DATES: The direct final rule is effective on February 20, 2007 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by January
22, 2007 or by February 5, 2007 if a public hearing is requested by
January 2, 2007. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a
timely withdrawal in the Federal Register indicating which amendments,
sections, or paragraphs will become effective and which are being
withdrawn due to adverse comment. If anyone contacts EPA requesting to
speak at a public hearing, a public hearing will be held on January 8,
2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0093. All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be
publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket,
EPA West, Room B-102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air
and Radiation Docket is (202) 566-1742.
Note: The EPA Docket Center suffered damage due to flooding
during the last week of June 2006. The Docket Center is continuing
to operate. However, during the cleanup, there will be temporary
changes to Docket Center telephone numbers, addresses, and hours of
operation for people who wish to make hand deliveries or visit the
Public Reading Room to view documents. Consult
[[Page 76923]]
EPA's Federal Register notice at 71 FR 38147 (July 5, 2006) or the
EPA Web site at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm for current
information on docket operations, locations, and telephone numbers.
The Docket Center's mailing address for U.S. mail and the procedure
for submitting comments to www.regulations.gov are not affected by
the flooding and will remain the same.
Public Hearing. If a public hearing is held, it will be held at 10
a.m. at the EPA's Environmental Research Center Auditorium, Research
Triangle Park, NC, or at an alternate site nearby.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information contact Mr.
David Salman, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Sector
Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group (E143-01),
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number (919) 541-0859; fax
number (919) 541-0246; e-mail address: salman.dave@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulated Entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated
by this action include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAICS
Category \*\ Examples of potentially
code regulated entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry...................... 336111 Automobile manufacturing.
336112 Light truck and utility vehicle
manufacturing.
336211 Motor vehicle body
manufacturing.
336120 Heavy duty truck manufacturing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* North American Industry Classification System.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
action. To determine whether your facility is regulated by this action,
you should examine the applicability criteria of the rule. If you have
any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed in the preceding FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
World Wide Web (WWW). In addition to being available in the docket,
an electronic copy of today's direct final Automobiles and Light-Duty
Trucks NESHAP will also be available on the WWW through the Technology
Transfer Network (TTN). Following the Administrator's signature, a copy
of the NESHAP will be posted on the TTN's policy and guidance page for
newly proposed or promulgated rules at https://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/.
The TTN at EPA's Web site provides information and technology exchange
in various areas of air pollution control.
Comments. We are publishing the direct final rule amendments
without prior proposal because we view the amendments as
noncontroversial and do not anticipate adverse comments. However, in
the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register notice, we are
publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to amend
the Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
IIII), the Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP (40 CFR 63, subpart MMMM),
and the Plastic Parts NESHAP (40 CFR 63, subpart PPPP) if material
adverse comments are filed. Instructions for submitting comments are
provided in that document. If we receive any material adverse comments
on one or more distinct amendments, we will publish a timely withdrawal
in the Federal Register informing the public which provisions will
become effective, and which provisions are being withdrawn due to
material adverse comment. We will address all public comments in a
subsequent final rule, should the EPA determine to issue one. Any of
the distinct amendments in today's direct final rule for which we do
not receive material adverse comment will become effective on the
previously mentioned date. We will not institute a second comment
period on the direct final rule amendments. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time.
Judicial Review. Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act
(CAA), judicial review of the direct final rule amendments is available
only by filing a petition for review in the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit by February 20, 2007.
Under section 307(d)(7)(B) of the CAA, only an objection to the direct
final rule amendments that was raised with reasonable specificity
during the period for public comment can be raised during judicial
review. Moreover, under section 307(b)(2) of the CAA, the requirements
established by the direct final rule amendments may not be challenged
separately in any civil or criminal proceeding brought by EPA to
enforce these requirements.
Outline. The information presented in this preamble is organized as
follows:
I. Background
II. Amendments
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
C. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
J. Congressional Review Act
I. Background
On April 26, 2004, we issued the final Automobiles and Light-Duty
Trucks NESHAP (69 FR 22602). The final NESHAP established standards to
control organic hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from new and
existing automobile and light-duty truck surface coating operations.
Today's action amends the final rule by adding an option to include the
coating of heavier vehicle bodies and parts for heavier vehicles in the
affected source under this NESHAP. We are also making direct final rule
amendments to the Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
subpart MMMM), and the Plastic Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
PPPP) to maintain consistency between these rules and the Automobiles
and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII). None of
the amendments will have any discernable effect on the stringency of
the rules.
II. Amendments
The discussion in this section of the preamble pertains to the
Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII)
unless otherwise noted as applying to the Miscellaneous Metal Parts
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart MMMM) or the Plastic Parts NESHAP (40
CFR part 63, subpart PPPP). Each of these rules has an early 2007
compliance date for existing sources.
The main focus of the final rule is the coating of new automobile
or new light-duty truck bodies, and body parts for new automobiles or
new light-duty trucks. The final rule also allows the owner or operator
of an automobile and light-duty truck coating affected source to
include in that affected source any coating operation which applies
coatings to parts intended for use in new automobiles or new light-duty
trucks or as aftermarket repair or replacement parts for automobiles or
light-duty trucks which would otherwise be subject to the Miscellaneous
Metal Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart MMMM) or the Plastic Parts
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63,
[[Page 76924]]
subpart PPPP). This makes it possible for such a facility to
demonstrate compliance with requirements applicable to all of these
activities within the final rule rather than having to demonstrate
compliance with two or three rules.
Some automobile and light-duty truck surface coating facilities
also coat heavier vehicle bodies or body parts for heavier vehicles.
The heavier vehicle bodies or body parts for heavier vehicles may be
coated using the same equipment and materials that are used to coat
automobile and light-duty truck bodies or body parts for automobiles
and light-duty trucks. The final rule does not currently provide an
option for including the coating of heavier vehicle bodies or body
parts for heavier vehicles in the automobile and light-duty truck
affected source. Lacking such an option, a facility which coats
automobiles or light-duty trucks and also coats heavier vehicle bodies
or body parts for heavier vehicles would be subject to the Automobiles
and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII) and also
would be subject to the Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part
63, subpart MMMM) or the Plastic Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart
PPPP). Adding the option of including the coating of heavier vehicle
bodies or body parts for heavier vehicles in the automobile and light-
duty truck affected source would make it possible for such a facility
to demonstrate compliance with requirements applicable to all of these
activities within the final rule rather than having to demonstrate
compliance with two or three rules.
Some facilities that coat only heavier vehicle bodies or body parts
for heavier vehicles have paint shops that are designed and operated in
the same manner as paint shops that are used to coat automobile and
light-duty truck bodies and body parts for automobiles and light-duty
trucks. The permit requirements for these heavier vehicle paint shops
are often structured in the same way as permit requirements for
automobile and light-duty truck paint shops. The volatile organic
compounds (VOC) compliance demonstration procedures that are used for
these heavier vehicle paint shops are often the same as the VOC
compliance demonstration procedures that are used for automobile and
light-duty truck paint shops and very similar to the HAP compliance
demonstration procedures in the Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII). Without the option of including
these heavier vehicle paint shops under the Automobiles and Light-Duty
Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII), these heavier vehicle
paint shops will have to demonstrate compliance both with VOC
requirements using automobile and light-duty truck procedures and HAP
requirements using very different procedures as specified in the other
NESHAP. Adding the option of including the coating of heavier vehicle
bodies or body parts for heavier vehicles in the automobile and light-
duty truck affected source would make it possible for such a facility
to demonstrate compliance with HAP requirements using the very similar
procedures in the Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR part
63, subpart IIII).
We, therefore, have amended the final rule by adding an option to
include the coating of heavier vehicle bodies, body parts for heavier
vehicles, and parts for heavier vehicles in the affected source under
this NESHAP. The direct final amendments use the term ``other motor
vehicle'' which is defined as ``a self-propelled vehicle designed for
transporting persons or property on a street or highway that has a
gross vehicle weight rating over 8,500 pounds.'' The emissions limits
in the Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP (40 CFR 63, subpart
IIII) are more stringent than the emissions limits in the Miscellaneous
Metal Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart MMMM) and the Plastic Parts
NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart PPPP). As a result, any heavier vehicle
coating operation that is included in this NESHAP will be required to
achieve the same or greater organic HAP emission reduction than it
would have been required to achieve under the other NESHAP. The first
monthly compliance period for existing sources in the Automobiles and
Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP begins on April 26, 2007 and ends on May 31,
2007. The first 12-month compliance period for existing sources in the
Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP begins on January 2, 2007 and ends on
February 29, 2008. The first 12-month compliance period for existing
sources in the Plastic Parts NESHAP begins on April 19, 2007 and ends
on May 31, 2008. We believe the earlier start of the first compliance
period for existing sources in the Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP is
inconsequential, particularly since the first compliance period for
existing sources in the Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP will
end sooner and continuous compliance with the Automobiles and Light-
Duty Trucks NESHAP will be demonstrated on a monthly basis as opposed
to the 12-month rolling basis used in the other two rules.
We have amended the Miscellaneous Metal Parts NESHAP (40 CFR part
63, subpart MMMM) to allow the coating of metal heavier vehicle bodies,
metal body parts for heavier vehicles, and metal parts for heavier
vehicles to comply with the Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks NESHAP
(40 CFR 63, subpart IIII) in lieu of complying with the Miscellaneous
Metal Parts NESHAP. We have amended the Plastic Parts NESHAP (40 CFR
part 63, subpart PPPP) to allow the coating of heavier plastic vehicle
bodies, plastic body parts for heavier vehicles, and plastic parts for
heavier vehicles to comply with the Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks
NESHAP (40 CFR 63, subpart IIII) in lieu of complying with the Plastic
Parts NESHAP.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) initially notified EPA
that it considered this action a ``significant regulatory action''
within the meaning of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993). Nevertheless, after reviewing information regarding this action,
OMB waived review of this action.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new information collection burden.
This action adds optional provisions to the final standards. OMB has
previously approved the information collection requirements contained
in the existing regulations (40 CFR part 63, subpart IIII) under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq., and
has assigned OMB control number 2060-0550, EPA ICR No. 2045.02. A copy
of the Information Collection Request (ICR) may be obtained from Ms.
Susan Auby by mail at the Office of Environmental Information,
Collection Strategies Division (2822), EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20460, by e-mail at auby.susan@epa.gov, or by
calling (202) 566-1672. You also may download a copy from the Internet
at https://www.epa.gov/icr. Include the ICR number in any
correspondence.
Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology
[[Page 76925]]
and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to
be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
EPA has determined that it is not necessary to prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis in connection with the direct final rule
amendments.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's direct final rule
on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business
according to Small Business Administration size standards for companies
identified by NAICS codes 336111 (automobile manufacturing) and 336112
(light truck and utility vehicle manufacturing) with 1,000 or fewer
employees; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government
of a city, county, town, school district, or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is
any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated
and is not dominant in its field. Based on the above definition, there
are no small entities presently engaged in automobile and light-duty
truck surface coating.
After considering the economic impacts of the final rule on small
entities, EPA has concluded that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This is based on the observation that the final rule affects no small
entities since none are engaged in the surface coating of automobiles
and light-duty trucks.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
1 year. Before promulgating a rule for which a written statement is
needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires us to identify and
consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the
least costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative that
achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205 do
not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover,
section 205 allows us to adopt an alternative other than the least
costly, most cost-effective, or least burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that
alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely
input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant
Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and
advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory
requirements.
EPA has determined that the direct final rule amendments do not
contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100
million or more for State, local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or the private sector in any 1 year. The direct final rule
amendments provide the option of including surface coating of heavier
motor vehicles under this rule and, therefore, add no additional burden
on sources. Thus, the direct final rule amendments are not subject to
the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
The direct final rule amendments do not have federalism
implications. They will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. No
facilities subject to the direct final rule amendments are owned by
State or local governments. Therefore, State and local governments will
not have any direct compliance costs resulting from the direct final
rule amendments. Furthermore, the direct final rule amendments do not
require these governments to take on any new responsibilities. Thus,
Executive Order 13132 does not apply to the direct final rule
amendments.
F. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' The direct final rule
amendments do not have tribal implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. They will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, because we are not
aware of any Indian tribal governments or communities affected by the
direct final rule amendments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to the direct final rule amendments.
G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any
rule that: (1) is determined to be ``economically significant'' as
defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental
health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a
disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets
both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or
safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective
[[Page 76926]]
and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that
the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Executive Order has
the potential to influence the regulation. The direct final rule
amendments are not subject to Executive Order 13045 because they are
based on technology performance and not on health or safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
The direct final rule amendments are not a ``significant energy
action'' as defined in Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because they are not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The direct final rule amendments provide the option of
including surface coating of heavier motor vehicles under this rule
and, therefore, add no additional burden on sources. We have,
therefore, concluded that the direct final rule amendments are not
likely to have any adverse energy effects.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995, Public Law No. 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. VCS are technical standards
(e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or adopted by VCS bodies. The
NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when
the Agency decides not to use available and applicable VCS. The direct
final rule amendments do not involve technical standards. Therefore,
EPA is not considering the use of any VCS.
J. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing the
direct final rule amendments and other required information to the
United States Senate, the United States House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the direct final rule amendments in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. The direct final rule amendments are not a ``major rule'' as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The direct final rule amendments will be
effective on February 20, 2007.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, and Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 18, 2006.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, Title 40, chapter I, part
63 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:
PART 63--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
Subpart IIII--[Amended]
0
2. Section 63.3080 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 63.3080 What is the purpose of this subpart?
This subpart establishes national emission standards for hazardous
air pollutants (NESHAP) for facilities which surface coat new
automobile or new light-duty truck bodies or body parts for new
automobiles or new light-duty trucks. This subpart also establishes
NESHAP for facilities which surface coat new other motor vehicle bodies
or body parts for new other motor vehicles which you choose to include
in your affected source pursuant to Sec. 63.3082(c). This subpart also
establishes requirements to demonstrate initial and continuous
compliance with the emission limitations.
0
3. Section 63.3081 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.3081 Am I subject to this subpart?
* * * * *
(b) You are subject to this subpart if you own or operate a new,
reconstructed, or existing affected source, as defined in Sec.
63.3082, that is located at a facility which applies topcoat to new
automobile or new light-duty truck bodies or body parts for new
automobiles or new light-duty trucks, and that is a major source, is
located at a major source, or is part of a major source of emissions of
hazardous air pollutants (HAP). You are subject to this subpart if you
own or operate a new, reconstructed, or existing affected source, as
defined in Sec. 63.3082, in which you choose to include, pursuant to
Sec. 63.3082(c), any coating operations which apply coatings to new
other motor vehicle bodies or body parts for new other motor vehicles;
parts intended for use in new automobiles, new light-duty trucks, or
new other motor vehicles; or aftermarket repair or replacement parts
for automobiles, light-duty trucks, or other motor vehicles; and the
affected source is located at a facility that is a major source, is
located at a major source, or is part of a major source of emissions of
HAP. A major source of HAP emissions is any stationary source or group
of stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under common
control that emits or has the potential to emit any single HAP at a
rate of 9.07 megagrams (Mg) (10 tons) or more per year or any
combination of HAP at a rate of 22.68 Mg (25 tons) or more per year.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 63.3082 is amended by revising paragraphs (c) and (e) to
read as follows:
Sec. 63.3082 What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?
* * * * *
(c) In addition, you may choose to include in your affected source,
and thereby make subject to the requirements of this subpart, any
coating operations, as defined in Sec. 63.3176, which would otherwise
be subject to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
Products (subpart MMMM of this part) or the National Emission Standards
for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Surface Coating of Plastic Parts and
Products (subpart PPPP of this part) which apply coatings to new other
motor vehicle bodies or body parts for new other motor vehicles, parts
intended for use in new automobiles, new light-duty trucks, or new
other motor vehicles, or aftermarket repair or replacement parts for
automobiles, light-duty trucks, or other motor vehicles.
* * * * *
(e) An affected source is a new affected source if:
[[Page 76927]]
(1) You commenced its construction after December 24, 2002; and
(2) The construction is of a completely new automobile and light-
duty truck assembly plant, automobile and light-duty truck paint shop,
automobile and light-duty truck topcoat operation, other motor vehicle
assembly plant, other motor vehicle paint shop, or other motor vehicle
topcoat operation where previously no automobile and light-duty truck
assembly plant, automobile and light-duty truck assembly paint shop, or
automobile and light-duty truck assembly topcoat operation had existed;
and
(i) No other motor vehicle assembly plant, other motor vehicle
paint shop, or other motor vehicle topcoat operation had existed
previously; or
(ii) No previously existing other motor vehicle assembly plant,
other motor vehicle paint shop, or other motor vehicle topcoat
operation is subject to this subpart; or
(iii) If the facility was previously not a major source for HAP, no
previously existing other motor vehicle assembly plant, other motor
vehicle paint shop, or other motor vehicle topcoat operation is made
part of the affected source under this subpart.
* * * * *
0
5. Section 63.3110 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 63.3110 What notifications must I submit?
* * * * *
(b) You must submit the Initial Notification required by Sec.
63.9(b) for a new or reconstructed affected source no later than 120
days after initial startup or 120 days after June 25, 2004, whichever
is later. For an existing affected source, you must submit the Initial
Notification no later than 1 year after April 26, 2004. Existing
sources that have previously submitted notifications of applicability
of this rule pursuant to Sec. 112(j) of the CAA are not required to
submit an Initial Notification under Sec. 63.9(b) except to identify
and describe all additions to the affected source made pursuant to
Sec. 63.3082(c). If you elect to include the surface coating of new
other motor vehicle bodies, body parts for new other motor vehicles,
parts for new other motor vehicles, or aftermarket repair or
replacement parts for other motor vehicles in your affected source
pursuant to Sec. 63.3082(c) and your affected source has an initial
startup before February 20, 2007, then you must submit an Initial
Notification of this election no later than 120 days after initial
startup or February 20, 2007, whichever is later.
* * * * *
0
6. Section 63.3176 is amended by:
0
a. Removing the definition of ``Automobile and/or light-duty truck
assembly plant''.
0
b. Adding in alphabetical order definitions for ``Automobile and light-
duty truck assembly plant,'' ``Other motor vehicle,'' and ``Other motor
vehicle assembly plant'' to read as follows:
Sec. 63.3176 What definitions apply to this subpart?
* * * * *
Automobile and light-duty truck assembly plant means a facility
which assembles automobiles or light-duty trucks, including coating
facilities and processes.
* * * * *
Other motor vehicle means a self-propelled vehicle designed for
transporting persons or property on a street or highway that has a
gross vehicle weight rating over 8,500 pounds. You may choose to make
the coating of other motor vehicles subject to this subpart pursuant to
Sec. 63.3082(c).
Other motor vehicle assembly plant means a facility which assembles
other motor vehicles, including coating facilities and processes.
* * * * *
Subpart MMMM--[Amended]
0
7. Section 63.3881 is amended by revising the last sentence of
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.3881 Am I subject to this subpart?
* * * * *
(d) * * * Surface coating operations on metal parts or products
(e.g., parts for motorcycles or lawnmowers) not intended for use in
automobiles, light-duty trucks, or other motor vehicles as defined in
Sec. 63.3176 cannot be made part of your affected source under subpart
IIII of this part.
* * * * *
Subpart PPPP--[Amended]
0
8. Section 63.4481 is amended by revising the last sentence of
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.4481 Am I subject to this subpart?
* * * * *
(d) * * * Surface coating operations on plastic parts or products
(e.g., parts for motorcycles or lawnmowers) not intended for use in
automobiles, light-duty trucks, or other motor vehicles as defined in
Sec. 63.3176 cannot be made part of your affected source under subpart
IIII of this part.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-21975 Filed 12-21-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P