Azoxystrobin; Pesticide Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions, 76178-76180 [E6-21498]
Download as PDF
76178
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR Part 180
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–9364; e-mail address: Sec-18Mailbox@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0823; FRL–8100–9]
I. General Information
Azoxystrobin; Pesticide Tolerances for
Emergency Exemptions
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a
time-limited tolerance for combined
residues of azoxystrobin and its Z
isomer, on rice, wild. This action is in
response to EPA’s granting of an
emergency exemption under section 18
of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,
and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
authorizing use of the pesticide on rice,
wild. This regulation establishes a
maximum permissible level for
combined residues of azoxystrobin in
this food commodity. The tolerance
expires and is revoked on December 31,
2009.
DATES: This regulation is effective
December 20, 2006. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before February 20, 2007, and
must be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0823. All documents in the
docket are listed on the regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket
at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the Office of
Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory
Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive Arlington, VA. The hours
of operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Libby Pemberton, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as
amended by the FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
procedural regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
OPP–2006–0823 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before February 20, 2007.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your
copies, identified by docket ID number
EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0823, by one of
the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
EPA, on its own initiative, in
accordance with sections 408(e) and
408(l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a,
is establishing time-limited tolerances
for combined residues of the fungicide,
azoxystrobin, methyl (E)-2-(2-(6-(2cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4yloxy)phenyl)-3-methoxyacrylate and
the Z isomer of azoxystrobin, methyl
(Z)-2-(2-(6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin4-yloxy)phenyl)-3-methoxyacrylate, on
rice, wild at 5.0 parts per million (ppm).
This tolerance expires and is revoked on
December 31, 2009. EPA will publish a
document in the Federal Register to
remove the revoked tolerance from the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
Section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA
requires EPA to establish a time-limited
tolerance or exemption from the
requirement for a tolerance for pesticide
chemical combined residues in food
that will result from the use of a
pesticide under an emergency
exemption granted by EPA under
section 18 of FIFRA. Such tolerances
can be established without providing
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
notice or period for public comment.
EPA does not intend for its actions on
section 18 related tolerances to set
binding precedents for the application
of section 408 of the FFDCA and the
new safety standard to other tolerances
and exemptions. Section 408(e) of the
FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance or an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance on its own
initiative, i.e., without having received
any petition from an outside party.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA
to give special consideration to
exposure of infants and children to the
pesticide chemical residue in
establishing a tolerance and to ‘‘ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue. . . .’’
Section 18 of the FIFRA authorizes
EPA to exempt any Federal or State
agency from any provision of FIFRA, if
EPA determines that ‘‘emergency
conditions exist which require such
exemption.’’ This provision was not
amended by the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 (FQPA). EPA has
established regulations governing such
emergency exemptions in 40 CFR part
166.
III. Emergency Exemption for
Azoxystrobin on Rice, Wild and FFDCA
Tolerances
The Minnesota Department of
Agriculture declared a crisis exemption
under FIFRA section 18 for the use of
azoxystrobin on rice, wild for control of
stem rot disease caused by Nakataea
sigmoidea. Minnesota states that it
appears that stem rot is widespread
throughout the state and can cause
significant damage.
As part of its assessment of this
emergency exemption, EPA assessed the
potential risks presented by combined
residues of azoxystrobin and its Z
isomer on rice, wild. In doing so, EPA
considered the safety standard in
section 408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, and
EPA decided that the necessary
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
76179
tolerance under section 408(l)(6) of the
FFDCA would be consistent with the
safety standard and with FIFRA section
18. Consistent with the need to move
quickly on the emergency exemption in
order to address an urgent non-routine
situation and to ensure that the resulting
food is safe and lawful, EPA is issuing
this tolerance without notice and
opportunity for public comment as
provided in section 408(l)(6) of the
FFDCA. Although this tolerance expires
and is revoked on December 31, 2009,
under section 408(l)(5) of the FFDCA,
combined residues of the pesticide not
in excess of the amount specified in the
tolerance remaining on rice, wild after
that date will not be unlawful, provided
the pesticide is applied in a manner that
was lawful under FIFRA, and the
combined residues do not exceed a level
that was authorized by this tolerance at
the time of that application. EPA will
take action to revoke this tolerance
earlier if any experience with, scientific
data on, or other relevant information
on this pesticide indicate that the
combined residues are not safe.
Because this tolerance is being
approved under emergency conditions,
EPA has not made any decisions about
whether azoxystrobin meets EPA’s
registration requirements for use on rice,
wild or whether a permanent tolerance
for this use would be appropriate.
Under these circumstances, EPA does
not believe that this tolerance serves as
a basis for registration of azoxystrobin
by a State for special local needs under
FIFRA section 24(c). Nor does this
tolerance serve as the basis for any State
other than Minnesota to use this
pesticide on this crop under section 18
of FIFRA without following all
provisions of EPA’s regulations
implementing FIFRA section 18 as
identified in 40 CFR part 166. For
additional information regarding the
emergency exemption for azoxystrobin,
contact the Agency’s Registration
Division at the address provided under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess
the hazards of azoxystrobin and to make
a determination on aggregate exposure,
consistent with section 408(b)(2) of the
FFDCA, for time-limited tolerances for
combined residues of azoxystrobin and
its Z isomer on rice, wild at 5.0 ppm.
On August 23, 2006 the Agency
published in the Federal Register a final
rule (71 FR 49358) (FRL–8086–9)
establishing tolerances for combined
residues of azoxystrobin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2-propynyl)-2H-1,4benzoxazin-6-yl]-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1Hisoindole-1,3(2H)-dione in or on
vegetable, foliage of legume, group 7;
vegetable, fruiting, group 8 (except
tomato); pea and bean, succulent
shelled, subgroup 6B; pea and bean,
dried shelled, except soybean, subgroup
6C; citrus, dried pulp; citrus, oil; and
fruit, citrus, Group 10. When the
Agency conducted the risk assessments
in support of those tolerance actions,
the Agency also assessed the use of
azoxystrobin on wild rice under section
18 of FIFRA. Therefore, establishing the
rice, wild tolerance will not change the
most recent estimated aggregate risks
resulting from use of azoxystrobin, as
discussed in the August 23, 2006
Federal Register. Refer to the August 23,
2006 Federal Register document for a
detailed discussion of the aggregate risk
assessments and determination of
safety. EPA relies upon those risk
assessments and the findings made in
the Federal Register document in
support of this action.
Based on the risk assessments
discussed in the final rule published in
the Federal Register of August 23, 2006,
EPA concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the
general population, and to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to
azoxystrobin combined residues.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide combined
residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408
of the FFDCA and a complete
description of the risk assessment
process, see https://www.epa.gov/
fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1997/November/
Day-26/p30948.htm.
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
Adequate enforcement methodology
(gas chromatography-nitrogen
phosphorus detection) is available to
enforce the tolerance expression. The
method may be requested from: Chief,
Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905; email address: residuemethods@epa.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
B. International Residue Limits
There are no Codex, Canadian or
Mexican maximum residue limits
established for azoxystrobin on rice,
wild.
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
76180
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
VI. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for combined residues of azoxystrobin,
methyl (E)-2-(2-(6-(2cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4yloxy)phenyl)-3-methoxyacrylate and
the Z isomer of azoxystrobin, methyl
(Z)-2-(2-(6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin4-yloxy)phenyl)-3-methoxyacrylate, on
rice, wild at 5.0 ppm.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a timelimited tolerance under section 408 of
the FFDCA. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted these
types of actions from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993). Because this
rule has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866 due to its
lack of significance, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This final rule does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any
enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public
Law 104–4). Nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994); or OMB review or any Agency
action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104–113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are
established on the basis of a FIFRA
section 18 exemption under section 408
of the FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the
issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply. In addition, the
Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires
EPA to develop an accountable process
to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input
by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that
have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies
that have federalism implications’’ is
defined in the Executive order to
include regulations that have
‘‘substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’ This final rule
directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States. This action does not
alter the relationships or distribution of
power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption
provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the
Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’
as described in Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000). Executive
Order 13175, requires EPA to develop
an accountable process to ensure
‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal
officials in the development of
regulatory policies that have tribal
implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal
implications’’ is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations
that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.’’ This
rule will not have substantial direct
effects on tribal governments, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of this final
rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 6, 2006.
Donald R. Stubbs,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.507 is amended by
alphabetically adding the commodity
‘‘Rice, wild’’ to the table in paragraph
(b) to read as follows:
I
§ 180.507 Azoxystrobin; tolerances for
residues.
*
*
(b)
*
*
*
*
*
*
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
Rice, wild ..........
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
5.0
*
*
Expiration/
revocation
date
*
12/31/09
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–21498 Filed 12–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0177; FRL–8105–9]
Glyphosate; Pesticide Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of glyphosate in
or on sunflower; safflower; noni; pea,
dry; and vegetable, legume, group 6
except soybean, and pea, dry. The
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76178-76180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21498]
[[Page 76178]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0823; FRL-8100-9]
Azoxystrobin; Pesticide Tolerances for Emergency Exemptions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes a time-limited tolerance for
combined residues of azoxystrobin and its Z isomer, on rice, wild. This
action is in response to EPA's granting of an emergency exemption under
section 18 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA) authorizing use of the pesticide on rice, wild. This regulation
establishes a maximum permissible level for combined residues of
azoxystrobin in this food commodity. The tolerance expires and is
revoked on December 31, 2009.
DATES: This regulation is effective December 20, 2006. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before February 20, 2007,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0823. All documents in the
docket are listed on the regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the Office
of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Libby Pemberton, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-9364; e-mail address: Sec-18-Mailbox@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by
EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0823 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be
in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or
before February 20, 2007.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0823, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
EPA, on its own initiative, in accordance with sections 408(e) and
408(l)(6) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21
U.S.C. 346a, is establishing time-limited tolerances for combined
residues of the fungicide, azoxystrobin, methyl (E)-2-(2-(6-(2-
cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-yloxy)phenyl)-3-methoxyacrylate and the Z
isomer of azoxystrobin, methyl (Z)-2-(2-(6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-
yloxy)phenyl)-3-methoxyacrylate, on rice, wild at 5.0 parts per million
(ppm). This tolerance expires and is revoked on December 31, 2009. EPA
will publish a document in the Federal Register to remove the revoked
tolerance from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
Section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA requires EPA to establish a time-
limited tolerance or exemption from the requirement for a tolerance for
pesticide chemical combined residues in food that will result from the
use of a pesticide under an emergency exemption granted by EPA under
section 18 of FIFRA. Such tolerances can be established without
providing
[[Page 76179]]
notice or period for public comment. EPA does not intend for its
actions on section 18 related tolerances to set binding precedents for
the application of section 408 of the FFDCA and the new safety standard
to other tolerances and exemptions. Section 408(e) of the FFDCA allows
EPA to establish a tolerance or an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance on its own initiative, i.e., without having received any
petition from an outside party.
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Section 18 of the FIFRA authorizes EPA to exempt any Federal or
State agency from any provision of FIFRA, if EPA determines that
``emergency conditions exist which require such exemption.'' This
provision was not amended by the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
(FQPA). EPA has established regulations governing such emergency
exemptions in 40 CFR part 166.
III. Emergency Exemption for Azoxystrobin on Rice, Wild and FFDCA
Tolerances
The Minnesota Department of Agriculture declared a crisis exemption
under FIFRA section 18 for the use of azoxystrobin on rice, wild for
control of stem rot disease caused by Nakataea sigmoidea. Minnesota
states that it appears that stem rot is widespread throughout the state
and can cause significant damage.
As part of its assessment of this emergency exemption, EPA assessed
the potential risks presented by combined residues of azoxystrobin and
its Z isomer on rice, wild. In doing so, EPA considered the safety
standard in section 408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, and EPA decided that the
necessary tolerance under section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA would be
consistent with the safety standard and with FIFRA section 18.
Consistent with the need to move quickly on the emergency exemption in
order to address an urgent non-routine situation and to ensure that the
resulting food is safe and lawful, EPA is issuing this tolerance
without notice and opportunity for public comment as provided in
section 408(l)(6) of the FFDCA. Although this tolerance expires and is
revoked on December 31, 2009, under section 408(l)(5) of the FFDCA,
combined residues of the pesticide not in excess of the amount
specified in the tolerance remaining on rice, wild after that date will
not be unlawful, provided the pesticide is applied in a manner that was
lawful under FIFRA, and the combined residues do not exceed a level
that was authorized by this tolerance at the time of that application.
EPA will take action to revoke this tolerance earlier if any experience
with, scientific data on, or other relevant information on this
pesticide indicate that the combined residues are not safe.
Because this tolerance is being approved under emergency
conditions, EPA has not made any decisions about whether azoxystrobin
meets EPA's registration requirements for use on rice, wild or whether
a permanent tolerance for this use would be appropriate. Under these
circumstances, EPA does not believe that this tolerance serves as a
basis for registration of azoxystrobin by a State for special local
needs under FIFRA section 24(c). Nor does this tolerance serve as the
basis for any State other than Minnesota to use this pesticide on this
crop under section 18 of FIFRA without following all provisions of
EPA's regulations implementing FIFRA section 18 as identified in 40 CFR
part 166. For additional information regarding the emergency exemption
for azoxystrobin, contact the Agency's Registration Division at the
address provided under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide combined residues. For further
discussion of the regulatory requirements of section 408 of the FFDCA
and a complete description of the risk assessment process, see https://
www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1997/November/Day-26/p30948.htm.
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed
the available scientific data and other relevant information in support
of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of
azoxystrobin and to make a determination on aggregate exposure,
consistent with section 408(b)(2) of the FFDCA, for time-limited
tolerances for combined residues of azoxystrobin and its Z isomer on
rice, wild at 5.0 ppm. On August 23, 2006 the Agency published in the
Federal Register a final rule (71 FR 49358) (FRL-8086-9) establishing
tolerances for combined residues of azoxystrobin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4-
dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2-propynyl)-2H-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-4,5,6,7-
tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dione in or on vegetable, foliage of
legume, group 7; vegetable, fruiting, group 8 (except tomato); pea and
bean, succulent shelled, subgroup 6B; pea and bean, dried shelled,
except soybean, subgroup 6C; citrus, dried pulp; citrus, oil; and
fruit, citrus, Group 10. When the Agency conducted the risk assessments
in support of those tolerance actions, the Agency also assessed the use
of azoxystrobin on wild rice under section 18 of FIFRA. Therefore,
establishing the rice, wild tolerance will not change the most recent
estimated aggregate risks resulting from use of azoxystrobin, as
discussed in the August 23, 2006 Federal Register. Refer to the August
23, 2006 Federal Register document for a detailed discussion of the
aggregate risk assessments and determination of safety. EPA relies upon
those risk assessments and the findings made in the Federal Register
document in support of this action.
Based on the risk assessments discussed in the final rule
published in the Federal Register of August 23, 2006, EPA concludes
that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the
general population, and to infants and children from aggregate exposure
to azoxystrobin combined residues.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
Adequate enforcement methodology (gas chromatography-nitrogen
phosphorus detection) is available to enforce the tolerance expression.
The method may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350;
telephone number: (410) 305-2905; e-mail address:
residuemethods@epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
There are no Codex, Canadian or Mexican maximum residue limits
established for azoxystrobin on rice, wild.
[[Page 76180]]
VI. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for combined residues of
azoxystrobin, methyl (E)-2-(2-(6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-
yloxy)phenyl)-3-methoxyacrylate and the Z isomer of azoxystrobin,
methyl (Z)-2-(2-(6-(2-cyanophenoxy)pyrimidin-4-yloxy)phenyl)-3-
methoxyacrylate, on rice, wild at 5.0 ppm.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a time-limited tolerance under section
408 of the FFDCA. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993). Because this rule has been exempted from review under Executive
Order 12866 due to its lack of significance, this rule is not subject
to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001). This final rule does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor
does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994);
or OMB review or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and
Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not
involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration
of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA),
Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since
tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a FIFRA
section 18 exemption under section 408 of the FFDCA, such as the
tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. In addition, the Agency has
determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect
on States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132,
entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). Executive Order
13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' This final
rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and
food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the
relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established
by Congress in the preemption provisions of section 408(n)(4) of the
FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this rule
does not have any ``tribal implications'' as described in Executive
Order 13175, entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000). Executive Order 13175,
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' ``Policies that have tribal
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.'' This rule will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 6, 2006.
Donald R. Stubbs,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.507 is amended by alphabetically adding the commodity
``Rice, wild'' to the table in paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 180.507 Azoxystrobin; tolerances for residues.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Expiration/
Commodity Parts per revocation
million date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Rice, wild.................................... 5.0 12/31/09
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-21498 Filed 12-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S