United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement, 76127-76134 [06-9780]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Parts 10 and 191
[CBP Dec. 06–39]
RIN 1505–AB47
United States-Chile Free Trade
Agreement
Customs and Border
Protection, Depart of Homeland
Security; Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCIES:
SUMMARY: This document adopts as a
final rule, with some changes, interim
amendments to title 19 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (‘‘CFR’’) which
were published in the Federal Register
on March 7, 2005, as CBP Dec. 05–07 to
implement the preferential tariff
treatment and other customs-related
provisions of the United States-Chile
Free Trade Agreement signed by the
United States and the Republic of Chile.
DATES: Final rule effective January 19,
2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Textile Operational Aspects: Robert
Abels, Office of Field Operations, (202)
344–1959.
Other Operational Aspects: Lori
Whitehurst, Office of Field Operations,
(202) 344–2722.
Audit Aspects: Mark Hanson, Office
of Regulatory Audit, (202) 344–2877.
Legal Aspects: Edward Leigh, Office
of International Trade, (202) 572–8827.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 6, 2003, the United States
and the Republic of Chile (the ‘‘Parties’’)
signed the U.S.-Chile Free Trade
Agreement (‘‘US–CFTA’’). The
provisions of the US–CFTA were
adopted by the United States with the
enactment of the United States-Chile
Free Trade Agreement Implementation
Act (the ‘‘Act’’), Public Law 108–77, 117
Stat. 909 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note), on
September 3, 2003. Section 210 of the
Act requires that regulations be
prescribed as necessary.
Those customs-related US–CFTA
provisions which require
implementation through regulation
include certain tariff and non-tariff
provisions within Chapter Three
(National Treatment and Market Access
for Goods) and the provisions of Chapter
Four (Rules of Origin and Origin
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
Procedures) and Chapter Five (Customs
Administration).
The tariff-related provisions within
US–CFTA Chapter Three which require
regulatory action by CBP are Article 3.7
(Temporary Admission of Goods),
Article 3.9 (Goods Re-Entered after
Repair or Alteration), and Article 3.20
(Rules of Origin and Related Matters).
Chapter Four of the US–CFTA sets
forth the rules for determining whether
an imported good qualifies as an
originating good of the United States or
Chile (US–CFTA Party) and, as such, is
therefore eligible for preferential tariff
(duty-free or reduced duty) treatment as
provided for under Article 4.1 and
Annex 4.1 of the US–CFTA. Under
Article 4.1 within that Chapter,
originating goods may be grouped in
three broad categories: (1) Goods which
are wholly obtained or produced
entirely in one or both of the Parties; (2)
goods which are produced entirely in
one or both of the Parties and which
satisfy the specific rules of origin in US–
CFTA Annex 4.1 (change in tariff
classification requirement and/or
regional value content requirement);
and (3) goods which are produced
entirely in one or both of the Parties
exclusively from materials that originate
in those countries. Article 4.2 sets forth
the methods for calculating the regional
value content of a good. Article 4.3 sets
forth the rules for determining the value
of materials for purposes of calculating
the regional value content of a good and
applying the de minimis rule. Article
4.4 sets forth the rules for determining
whether accessories, spare parts, or
tools delivered with a good qualify as
material used in the production of such
good. Article 4.6 provides for
accumulation of production by two or
more producers. Article 4.7 provides a
de minimis criterion. The remaining
Articles within Section A of Chapter
Four consist of additional sub-rules,
applicable to the originating good
concept, involving fungible materials,
packaging materials, packing materials,
transshipment, and non-qualifying
operations. The basic rules of origin in
Chapter Four of the US–CFTA are set
forth in General Note 26, Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS). In addition, Section B of
Chapter Four sets forth the procedural
requirements which apply under the
US–CFTA, in particular with regard to
claims for preferential tariff treatment.
Chapter Five sets forth the customs
operational provisions related to the
implementation and continued
administration of the US–CFTA.
On March 7, 2005, Customs and
Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) published
CBP Dec. 05–07 in the Federal Register
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76127
(70 FR 10868) setting forth interim
amendments to implement the
preferential tariff treatment and other
customs-related provisions of the US–
CFTA. In order to provide transparency
and facilitate their use, the majority of
the US–CFTA implementing regulations
set forth in CBP Dec. 05–07 were
included within new Subpart H in Part
10 of title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (19 CFR Subpart H, Part 10).
However, in those cases in which US–
CFTA implementation was more
appropriate in the context of an existing
regulatory provision, the US–CFTA
regulatory text was incorporated in an
existing part within the CBP regulations.
CBP Dec. 05–07 also set forth a number
of cross-references and other
consequential changes to existing
regulatory provisions to clarify the
relationship between those existing
provisions and the new US–CFTA
implementing regulations.
Although the interim regulatory
amendments were promulgated without
prior public notice and comment
procedures and took effect on March 7,
2005, CBP Dec. 05–07 provided for the
submission of public comments which
would be considered before adoption of
the interim regulations as a final rule,
and the prescribed public comment
period closed on June 6, 2005. A
discussion of the comments received by
CBP is set forth below.
Discussion of Comments
A total of three commenters
responded to the solicitation of
comments on the interim regulations set
forth in CBP Dec. 05–07. The comments
are discussed below.
Comment:
One commenter stated that §§ 10.412
and 10.415, which concern importer
obligations and maintenance of records,
respectively, should make clear that
importers are required to retain records
and documents related to the
production of goods for which
preferential tariff treatment is claimed
only to the extent that they possess such
records in the normal course of
business. The commenter explained
that, in many cases involving unrelated
parties, Chilean producers may be
unwilling to share their production
information and costs with the U.S.
importer.
CBP’s Response:
CBP recognizes that, under certain
circumstances, Chilean producers may
be reluctant to provide production
information and costs to U.S. importers
due to business confidentiality
concerns. In these cases, CBP has no
objection to the direct submission to the
port director of such information from
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
76128
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
the exporter or producer. To clarify this
point, CBP is amending § 10.412 in this
final rule by adding a sentence at the
end of paragraph (a) stating that CBP
will allow for the direct submission by
the exporter or producer of business
confidential or other sensitive
information, including cost and
sourcing information. Regarding
§ 10.415, CBP notes that paragraph (a) of
that section provides, in pertinent part,
that an importer claiming preferential
tariff treatment must maintain for five
years after the date of importation of the
good ‘‘* * * any records and
documents that the importer has
relating to the origin of the good * * *.’’
[Emphasis added.] CBP submits that the
current language of the regulation
adequately addresses the commenters’s
concerns.
Comment:
One commenter noted that §§ 10.441
and 10.442, concerning procedures for
the filing and processing of postimportation duty-refund claims, set
forth several references to the words
‘‘petition or request for reliquidation.’’
The commenter asks whether these
references are necessary in view of the
fact that 19 U.S.C. 1520(c) was repealed
by section 2105 of the Miscellaneous
Trade and Technical Corrections Act of
2004 (Pub. L. 108–429, 118 Stat. 2434).
CBP’s Response:
Section 1520(c), which authorized the
reliquidation of an entry under certain
circumstances, was repealed effective
December 18, 2004 (see § 2108 of the
Miscellaneous Trade and Technical
Corrections Act of 2004). As a result,
CBP agrees with the commenter that the
references to ‘‘petition or request for
reliquidation’’ in §§ 10.441(b)(4) and
10.442(b), (c)(2), and (d)(3) are no longer
necessary. These references have been
removed in this final rule document.
Comment:
One commenter stated that
§ 10.455(a)(3), concerning the value of
materials, is too broad because ‘‘it
would preclude transaction value as the
value of a material where the material
is provided to the producer at a price
reflecting any discount or reduction in
price,’’ including quantity discounts.
[Emphasis by commenter.] The
commenter suggested that the wording
of this paragraph should parallel the
definition of assists in § 152.102(a) of
the CBP regulations; e.g., ‘‘In the case of
a material provided to the producer free
of charge or at reduced cost * * *.’’
CBP’s Response:
First, CBP assumes that, by using the
term ‘‘transaction value,’’ the
commenter meant to refer to ‘‘adjusted
value’’ or ‘‘the price actually paid or
payable,’’ as those terms are used in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of § 10.455.
Second, the language ‘‘* * * or at a
price reflecting a discount or similar
reduction * * *.’’ in § 10.455(a)(3) was
taken verbatim from Article 4.3 of the
US–CFTA and section 202(e) of the Act.
CBP is bound by this statutory language
and cannot make the substantive change
suggested by the commenter. CBP notes
that the effect of this provision is to
prevent the value of originating
materials from being understated for
purposes of origin determination by the
type of common discounts to which the
commenter has referred.
Comment:
One commenter stated that
§ 10.483(c)(2), relating to voluntary
corrections of declarations, should be
revised to clarify that the affected
import transactions should be identified
‘‘to the extent possible.’’ According to
the commenter, in some cases, unrelated
exporters will not have details (such as
the date and port of importation) on the
import transactions that were affected
by the incorrect declaration.
CBP’s Response:
Section 10.410(b) states that it is the
responsibility of the U.S. importer (not
the exporter) to make a corrected
declaration. The importer clearly should
be able to identify from its records the
import transactions affected by the
incorrect declaration, including the port
and approximate date of each
importation. For this reason, CBP
declines to make the change to
§ 10.483(c)(2) suggested by the
commenter.
Comment:
Two commenters noted that CBP Dec.
05–07 amended the scope
section(§ 191.0) in Part 191 of the CBP
regulations, relating to drawback, to
provide a cross-reference to the US–
CFTA drawback provisions contained in
new Subpart H of Part 10. However, the
commenters stated that they were
unable to find any provisions in Subpart
H which discuss the subject of
drawback.
CBP’s Response:
Although CBP originally intended to
include regulations which address the
subject of drawback in new Subpart H
of Part 10, it was subsequently
determined that no such regulations
were necessary as the drawback
provisions in Part 191 were sufficient
for purposes of the US–CFTA. However,
CBP neglected to delete the amendment
to § 191.0 set forth in CBP Dec. 05–07,
as noted by the commenter. That error
has been corrected in this final rule
document.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Additional Changes to the Regulations
In addition to the regulatory changes
identified and discussed above in
connection with the discussion of
public comments received in response
to CBP Dec. 05–07, the final rulemaking
text set forth below incorporates the
following additional changes which
CBP believes are necessary based on
further internal review of the interim
regulatory text:
1. In § 10.401, relating to the scope of
Subpart H:
a. The words ‘‘entered into’’ in the
first sentence have been replaced by the
word ‘‘signed’’ to avoid any potential
confusion between the date that the US–
CFTA was signed (June 6, 2003) and the
date that it entered into force (January
1, 2004); and
b. The reference to Part 191 in the
third sentence has been removed
consistent with the removal of the crossreference to Subpart H, Part 10 in
§ 191.0, as discussed in the comment
discussion above;
2. In § 10.402, which sets forth general
definitions:
a. The definition of ‘‘claim for
preferential tariff treatment’’ in
paragraph (c) has been revised to add
the words ‘‘and to an exemption from
the merchandise processing fee’’ at the
end of the definition to clarify that the
term encompasses a claim that a good is
entitled to an exemption from the
merchandise processing fee (see
§ 24.23(c)(7) of the CBP regulations);
b. The definition of ‘‘national’’
(formerly paragraph (o)) has been
removed as that term is not used in
Subpart H of Part 10;
c. A definition of ‘‘identical goods’’
has been added as new paragraph (n).
This definition was set forth in
§§ 10.411(d)(2) and 10.422(d)(2) of the
interim regulatory text but has been
removed from those provisions and
inserted into the general definitions
section for the reason that the term also
appears in § 10.474, and the definition
is equally applicable to all three
provisions. In addition, the definition
has been modified slightly by replacing
the word ‘‘production’’ with the words
‘‘particular rule of origin,’’ which CBP
believes more accurately describe the
means by which a good is determined
to qualify as originating;
d. As a result of the removal of the
definition of ‘‘national’’ and the
addition of a definition for ‘‘identical
goods’’ discussed above, current
paragraph (n), setting forth the
definition of ‘‘indirect material,’’ has
been re-designated as paragraph (o), and
a conforming change has been made to
§ 10.460 to reflect the re-designation of
this paragraph; and
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
e. The definition of ‘‘preferential tariff
treatment’’ in paragraph (s) has been
revised to add the words ‘‘, and an
exemption from the merchandise
processing fee’’ at the end of the
definition to clarify that the term
includes an exemption from the
merchandise processing fee.
3. In § 10.410, relating to the filing of
a claim for preferential tariff treatment:
a. Paragraph (a) has been revised to
add the words ‘‘including an exemption
from the merchandise processing fee,’’
immediately following the words
‘‘under the US–CFTA,’’ in the first
sentence to clarify that a claim for
preferential tariff treatment for an
originating good under the US–CFTA
includes a claim that the good is
entitled to an exemption from the
merchandise processing fee;
b. Paragraph (b) has been revised to
add the words ‘‘or other information’’
immediately following the word
‘‘certification’’, consistent with the
wording in the corresponding provision
in the US–CFTA (see Article 4.12.1(c));
and
c. Paragraph (b) has been further
revised to provide that a corrected
declaration may be effected by
submission of a statement ‘‘via an
authorized electronic data interchange
system,’’ as an alternative to submission
of a written statement, consistent with
CBP’s movement toward a paperless
environment;
4. In § 10.411, relating to the
certification of origin:
a. The heading to § 10.411 and the
paragraph (a) introductory text have
been revised to add the words ‘‘or other
information’’ after ‘‘certification’’ and
‘‘certification of origin’’ to conform to
the wording in Articles 4.12.1(b) and
4.14.1 of the US–CFTA, which reference
the importer’s obligation to submit a
certificate of origin or other information
demonstrating that the good qualifies as
originating;
b. Paragraph (a)(2)(iv) has been
modified to add the words ‘‘for which
preferential tariff treatment is claimed’’
immediately following the word ‘‘good’’
for clarification purposes;
c. Paragraph (a)(2)(vii), relating to
multiple shipments of identical goods,
has been removed and incorporated (in
slightly revised form) into re-designated
paragraph (e)(2) (formerly paragraph
(d)(2)) to clarify that this provision
applies to certifications but not to
‘‘other information’’ submitted pursuant
to § 10.411(a);
d. Paragraph (a)(3), which sets forth
the certifying statement to be included
on the certification of origin, has been
removed and re-designated as new
paragraph (b) and a heading has been
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
added. This change clarifies that the
statement is required on the certification
but not when ‘‘other information’’ is
submitted pursuant to § 10.411(a);
e. As a result of the insertion of new
paragraph (b), as discussed above,
paragraphs (b) through (e) of the interim
regulatory text have been re-designated
as paragraphs (c) through (f),
respectively;
f. Re-designated paragraph (c)
(formerly paragraph (b)), which
concerns who may sign the certification,
has been revised to require that the
certification of origin include the legal
name and address of the responsible
official or authorized agent signing the
certification, and also to ask for the
telephone and e-mail address when
available. This information is necessary
in the event that the person signing the
certification is not identified pursuant
to paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (a)(2)(iii)
of § 10.411; and
g. Re-designated paragraphs (d) and (f)
(formerly paragraphs (c) and (e),
respectively) have been revised to add
the words ‘‘or other information’’
immediately following the word
‘‘certification,’’ consistent with the
changes to paragraph (a) discussed
above;
5. In § 10.412, relating to importer
obligations:
a. Paragraph (a) has been revised to
add the words ‘‘or other information
submitted to CBP under § 10.411(a) of
this subpart’’ immediately following the
word ‘‘certification’’, consistent with the
change to the § 10.411(a) introductory
text discussed above;
b. The paragraph (b) introductory text
and paragraph (b)(1) have been revised
to add the word ‘‘tariff’’ between the
words ‘‘preferential’’ and ‘‘treatment’’
each place they appear for clarification
purposes and consistent with other
references to these words throughout
Subpart H. Paragraph (b)(1) has been
further revised to add the words ‘‘or
other information’’ immediately
following the word ‘‘certification’’,
consistent with the change to the
§ 10.411(a) introductory text discussed
above; and
c. Paragraph (d), which stated that
‘‘* * * importers are expected to
establish and implement internal
controls which provide for the periodic
review of the accuracy of the
certifications or other records referred to
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section,’’ has
been removed as there is no basis of
authority for this provision in the US–
CFTA or the Act;
6. In § 10.413, concerning the validity
of the certification, the words ‘‘of this
subpart’’ have been added immediately
following the reference to ‘‘§ 10.411’’
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76129
each place it appears for clarification
purposes;
7. In § 10.414, which sets forth the
circumstances under which a
certification is not required:
a. The section heading, paragraph (a)
introductory text, and paragraph (b)
have been revised to add the words ‘‘or
other information’’ immediately
following the word ‘‘certification’’ each
place it appears, consistent with the
change to the § 10.411(a) introductory
text discussed above; and
b. The paragraph (a) introductory text
has been further revised to replace the
words ‘‘for preferential tariff treatment’’
with the words ‘‘as originating under
§ 10.411(a),’’ consistent with the
wording in § 10.411(a);
8. In § 10.415, concerning
maintenance of records, the paragraph
(a) introductory text has been revised:
a. To add the word ‘‘tariff’’ between
the words ‘‘preferential’’ and treatment’’
for clarification purposes and consistent
with other references to these words
throughout Subpart H;
b. To add the words ‘‘or other
information’’ immediately following the
word ‘‘certification’’, consistent with the
change to the § 10.411(a) introductory
text discussed above; and
c. To remove the words ‘‘in the
United States’’ to conform to the
corresponding provision in the US–
CFTA (see Article 4.14.3), which
includes no restriction on where the
records referenced in that provision
must be maintained;
9. In § 10.416, relating to the
consequences of failing to comply with
the requirements of Subpart H:
a. Paragraph (a) has been revised to
add the words ‘‘or other information
demonstrating that the good qualifies as
originating’’ immediately following the
word ‘‘certification’’, consistent with the
change to the § 10.411(a) introductory
text discussed above; and
b. Paragraph (b) has been revised to
add the words ‘‘of this subpart’’
immediately following the reference to
‘‘§ 10.463’’ for clarification purposes;
10. In § 10.420, relating to the filing of
a tariff preference level (TPL) claim, the
words ‘‘of this subpart’’ have been
added immediately following each of
the references to ‘‘§ 10.421’’, ‘‘§ 10.451’’,
‘‘§ 10.421(a) or (b)’’, and ‘‘§ 10.421(c)’’
for clarification purposes;
11. In § 10.421, concerning goods
eligible for TPL claims:
a. The words ‘‘of this subpart’’ have
been added immediately following the
reference to ‘‘§ 10.420’’ in the
introductory text for clarification
purposes; and
b. The term ‘‘HTS’’ has been replaced
each place it appears (including the
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
76130
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
footnote) with the correct term
‘‘HTSUS’’ (see § 10.402(m));
12. In § 10.422, relating to the TPL
certificate of eligibility:
a. The paragraph (a) introductory text
has been revised to add the words ‘‘of
this subpart’’ immediately following the
reference to ‘‘§ 10.421’’ for clarification
purposes;
b. Paragraph (a)(2), which sets forth
the information to be included on the
certificate of eligibility, has been
modified to require (in new paragraph
(a)(2)(ii)) that the certificate include the
legal name and address of the
responsible official or authorized agent
of the importer signing the certificate (if
different from the importer of record),
and also to ask for the telephone and email address when available. Similar to
the change to § 10.411(c) discussed
above, this change is necessary in the
event that the person signing the
certificate of eligibility is not identified
pursuant to § 10.422(a)(2)(i);
c. As a result of the addition of new
paragraph (a)(2)(ii), as discussed above,
paragraphs (a)(2)(ii) through (a)(2)(vii) of
the interim regulatory text have been redesignated as paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)
through (a)(2)(viii), respectively; and
d. The reference to ‘‘certification’’ in
paragraph (d)(2) has been replaced with
the correct word ‘‘certificate;’’
13. In § 10.424, concerning the effect
of noncompliance with applicable TPL
requirements, the words ‘‘of this
subpart’’ have been added immediately
following the reference to ‘‘§ 10.422’’ in
paragraph (a) and the reference to
‘‘§ 10.425’’ in paragraph (b) for
clarification purposes;
14. In § 10.440, relating to the right to
make post-importation duty refund
claims, the word ‘‘part’’ has been
replaced each place it appears with the
correct word ‘‘subpart’’;
15. In § 10.441, relating to the
procedures for filing post-importation
claims:
a. Paragraphs (a) and (b)(2) have been
revised to replace the word ‘‘part’’ each
place it appears with the correct word
‘‘subpart’’; and
b. Paragraph (b)(2) has been further
revised to add the words ‘‘or other
information demonstrating’’
immediately following the word
‘‘certification’’, consistent with the
change to the § 10.411(a) introductory
text discussed above;
16. In § 10.442, relating to CBP
processing procedures for postimportation claims:
a. The word ‘‘part’’ in paragraphs (a)
and (d)(1) has been replaced each place
it appears with the correct word
‘‘subpart’’;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
b. The words ‘‘for refund’’ have been
added immediately following the word
‘‘claim’’ in the first and second
sentences of paragraph (b) for
clarification purposes; and
c. Paragraphs (d)((2) and (d)(3) have
been revised to provide that notice of a
denial of a claim for a refund may be
made ‘‘via an authorized electronic data
interchange system,’’ as an alternative to
the issuance of a written notice,
consistent with CBP’s movement toward
a paperless environment;
17. In § 10.450, which sets forth
definitions regarding the rules of origin,
the words ‘‘of this subpart’’ have been
added immediately following the
reference to ‘‘§§ 10.450 through 10.463’’
in the introductory text for clarification
purposes:
18. In § 10.455, relating to the value
of materials:
a. Paragraph (a)(1) has been revised to
add the words ‘‘with respect to that
importation’’ at the end of the paragraph
to conform to the wording in the
corresponding statutory provision (see
§ 202(e)(1)(A) of the Act);
b. The heading to paragraph (b)
(‘‘Adjustments to value’’) has been
changed to read ‘‘Permissible additions
to, and deductions from, the value of
materials’’ to avoid any potential
confusion between the heading to this
paragraph and the term ‘‘adjusted
value;’’
c. Paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (b)(2)(i)
have been revised to delete the words
‘‘within or between the territory of
Chile, the United States, or both’’ to
conform these paragraphs to the
wording in the corresponding statutory
provisions (see § 202(e)(2)(A)(i) and
(B)(i) of the Act), respectively; and
d. Paragraph (c) has been modified to
replace the term ‘‘country,’’ which is not
defined in Subpart H, with the more
appropriate term ‘‘Party,’’ which is
defined in § 10.402(q);
19. In §§ 10.457(a) and 10.458(a),
concerning fungible goods and
materials, and accumulation,
respectively, the term ‘‘country’’ has
been replaced each place it appears with
the more appropriate term ‘‘Party;’’
20. In § 10.461, relating to indirect
materials, Example 1 has been revised to
add the words ‘‘of this subpart’’ at the
end of the parenthetical phrase ‘‘see
§ 10.454(a)’’ in the third sentence;
21. In § 10.470, relating to verification
of claims for preferential tariff
treatment:
a. The section heading has been
revised to add the word ‘‘tariff’’ between
the words ‘‘preferential’’ and
‘‘treatment’’;
b. The heading to paragraph (a) has
been revised to remove the words ‘‘by
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
CBP’’ to allow for the possibility that
another U.S. Government agency may
assist in a verification; and
c. The first sentence of the paragraph
(a) introductory text has been revised to
add the word ‘‘tariff’’ between the words
‘‘preferential’’ and ‘‘treatment’’ and to
add the words ‘‘of this subpart’’
immediately following the reference to
‘‘§ 10.410’’.
d. The second sentence of the
paragraph (a) introductory text has been
revised to replace the words ‘‘for any
reason is prevented from verifying’’
with the words ‘‘is provided with
insufficient information to verify or
substantiate’’, and to add the word
‘‘tariff’’ between the words
‘‘preferential’’ and ‘‘treatment’’. The
former change recognizes that the words
‘‘for any reason’’ may be interpreted too
broadly and result in the denial of a
claim for reasons beyond the control of
the parties to an import transaction.
This new wording more accurately
reflects the circumstances under which
a verification may result in the denial of
a claim—the failure to provide sufficient
information to verify or substantiate the
claim for preferential tariff treatment;
22. In § 10.473, concerning notice of
a negative origin determination:
a. The incorrect reference to
‘‘section’’‘ in the introductory text has
been replaced with the correct word
‘‘subpart’’;
b. The introductory text has been
further revised to provide for the
issuance of a negative origin
determination ‘‘via an authorized
electronic data interchange system,’’ as
an alternative to the issuance of a
written determination, consistent with
CBP’s movement toward a paperless
environment; and
c. Paragraph (c) has been revised to
replace the words ‘‘the ‘Rules of Origin’
heading under this subpart’’ with the
words ‘‘§§ 10.450 through 10.463 of this
subpart’’ to provide more clarity
regarding the regulatory provisions to
which this paragraph is referring;
23. In § 10.474, relating to repeated
false or unsupported preference claims,
the words ‘‘CBP finds’’ have been
replaced with the words ‘‘verification or
other information reveals’’ to more
accurately reflect the wording in
§ 205(g) of the Act, which provides, in
pertinent part, that ‘‘[i]f the Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection or the
Bureau of Immigration and Customs
Enforcement finds indications of a
pattern of conduct * * *.’’ [Emphasis
added.];
24. In § 10.483, concerning the
framework for correcting declarations
and certifications:
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
a. The incorrect reference to ‘‘part’’ in
paragraph (a)(2) has been replaced by
the correct word ‘‘chapter’’; and
b. Paragraph (c) has been revised to
remove the word ‘‘Written’’ in the
heading and by providing in the
introductory text for the submission of
a statement ‘‘via an authorized
electronic data interchange system,’’ as
an alternative to the submission of a
written statement, consistent with the
change described above in regard to
§ 10.410(b);
Conclusion
Accordingly, based on the comments
received and the analysis of those
comments as set forth above, and based
on the additional considerations
discussed above, CBP believes that the
interim regulations published as CBP
Dec. 05–07 should be adopted as a final
rule with certain changes as discussed
above and as set forth below.
Executive Order 12866
CBP has determined that this
document is not a regulation or rule
subject to the provisions of Executive
Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (58
FR 51735, October 1993), because it
pertains to a foreign affairs function of
the United States and implements an
international agreement and, therefore,
is specifically exempted by section
3(d)(2) of Executive Order 12866.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The regulations to implement the
preferential tariff treatment and other
customs-related provisions of the US–
CFTA were previously published in
CBP Dec. 05–07 as interim regulations.
CBP issued the regulations as an interim
rule because it had determined that: (1)
They involve the foreign affairs function
of the United States pursuant to section
553(a)(1) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA); and (2) prior
public notice and comment procedures
on these regulations were impracticable,
unnecessary, and contrary to the public
interest pursuant to section 553(b)(B) of
the APA. Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking was required, the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as
amended (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not
apply. Accordingly, this final rule is not
subject to the regulatory analysis
requirements or other requirements of 5
U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information
contained in this final rule has
previously been reviewed and approved
by the Office of Management and
Budget in accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under
control number 1651–0117. The
collection of information in these
regulations is in §§ 10.410 and 10.411.
This information is used by CBP to
determine eligibility for a tariff
preference or other rights or benefits
under the US–CFTA and the Act. The
likely respondents are business
organizations including importers,
exporters and manufacturers.
The estimated average annual burden
associated with the collection of
information in this final rule is 0.2
hours per respondent or recordkeeper.
Comments concerning the accuracy of
this burden estimate and suggestions for
reducing this burden should be directed
to the Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Treasury, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Washington, DC 20503. A copy should
also be sent to the Trade and
Commercial Regulations Branch,
Regulations and Rulings, Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection, 1300
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (Mint
Annex), Washington, DC 20229.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in
accordance with § 0.1(a)(1) of the CBP
regulations (19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)) pertaining
to the authority of the Secretary of the
Treasury (or his/her delegate) to
approve regulations related to certain
customs revenue functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 10
Alterations, Bonds, Customs duties
and inspection, Exports, Imports,
Preference programs, Repairs, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Trade
agreements (United States-Chile Free
Trade Agreement).
19 CFR Part 191
Commerce, Customs duties and
inspection, Drawback, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Trade
agreements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending parts 10, 24, 162, 163, 178,
and 191 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR
parts 10, 24, 162, 163, 178, and 191),
which was published at 70 FR 10868 on
March 7, 2005, is adopted as a final rule
with certain changes as discussed above
and set forth below.
I
PO 00000
PART 10—ARTICLES CONDITIONALLY
FREE, SUBJECT TO A REDUCED
RATE, ETC.
1. The general authority citation for
part 10 and the specific authority for
subpart H continue to read as follows:
I
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General
Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States), 1321, 1481, 1484, 1498, 1508,
1623, 1624, 3314;
*
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
Sections 10.401 through 10.490 also issued
under Pub. L. 108–77, 117 Stat. 909 (19
U.S.C. 3805 note).
§ 10.401
[Amended]
2. Section 10.401 is amended by
removing the words ‘‘entered into’’ in
the first sentence and adding, in their
place, the word ‘‘signed’’, by adding the
word ‘‘and’’ immediately prior to the
number ‘‘163’’ in the third sentence, and
by removing the words ‘‘and 191’’ in the
third sentence;
I 3. Section 10.402 is amended by
revising paragraph (c), removing current
paragraph (o), re-designating current
paragraph (n) as paragraph (o), adding a
new paragraph (n), and revising
paragraph (s). The revisions and
addition to § 10.402 read as follows:
I
§ 10.402
General definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Claim for preferential tariff
treatment. ‘‘Claim for preferential tariff
treatment’’ means a claim that a good is
entitled to the duty rate applicable
under the US–CFTA and to an
exemption from the merchandise
processing fee;
*
*
*
*
*
(n) Identical goods. ‘‘Identical goods’’
means goods that are the same in all
respects relevant to the particular rule of
origin that qualifies the goods as
originating;
*
*
*
*
*
(s) Preferential tariff treatment.
‘‘Preferential tariff treatment’’ means the
duty rate applicable to an originating
good under the US–CFTA, and an
exemption from the merchandise
processing fee.
*
*
*
*
*
I 4. Section 10.410 is amended by
adding the words ‘‘including an
exemption from the merchandise
processing fee,’’ immediately following
the words ‘‘under the US–CFTA,’’ in the
first sentence of paragraph (a) and by
revising paragraph (b). Revised
paragraph (b) reads as follows:
§ 10.410 Filing of claim for preferential
tariff treatment upon importation.
*
Frm 00021
76131
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
*
*
20DER1
*
*
76132
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Corrected declaration. If, after
making the declaration required under
paragraph (a) of this section, the U.S.
importer has reason to believe that the
declaration or the certification or other
information on which the declaration
was based contains information that is
not correct, the importer must, within
30 calendar days after the date of
discovery of the error, make a corrected
declaration and pay any duties that may
be due. A corrected declaration will be
effected by submission of a letter or
other statement either in writing or via
an authorized electronic data
interchange system to the CBP office
where the original declaration was filed
specifying the correction (see §§ 10.482
and 10.483 of this subpart);
I 5. In § 10.411:
I a. The section heading is revised;
I b. Paragraph (a) is amended by
revising the introductory text and
paragraph (a)(2)(iv) and by removing
paragraphs (a)(2)(vii) and (a)(3);
I c. Current paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and
(e) are re-designated as paragraphs (c),
(d), (e), and (f), respectively;
I d. A new paragraph (b) is added;
I e. The introductory text of redesignated paragraph (c) is revised;
I f. Re-designated paragraphs (d) and
(e)(2) and the introductory text to redesignated paragraph (f) are revised.
The additions and revisions to
§ 10.411 read as follows:
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
§ 10.411 Certification of origin or other
information.
(a) Contents. An importer who claims
preferential tariff treatment on a good
must submit, at the request of the port
director, a certification of origin or other
information demonstrating that the good
qualifies as originating. A certification
or other information submitted to CBP
under this paragraph:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(iv) A description of the good for
which preferential tariff treatment is
claimed, which must be sufficiently
detailed to relate it to the invoice and
the HS nonmenclature;
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Statement. A certification
submitted to CBP under paragraph (a) of
this section must include a statement, in
substantially the following form:
‘‘I Certify that:
The information on this document is
true and accurate and I assume the
responsibility for proving such
representations. I understand that I am
liable for any false statements or
material omissions made on or in
connection with this document;
I agree to maintain, and present upon
request, documentation necessary to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
Jkt 211001
support this certification, and to inform,
in writing, all persons to whom the
certification was given of any changes
that could affect the accuracy or validity
of this certification; and
The goods originated in the territory
of one or more of the parties, and
comply with the origin requirements
specified for those goods in the United
States-Chile Free Trade Agreement;
there has been no further production or
any other operation outside the
territories of the parties, other than
unloading, reloading, or any other
operation necessary to preserve it in
good condition or to transport the good
to the United States; and
This document consists of ll pages,
including all attachments.’’
(c) Responsible official or agent. A
certification submitted under paragraph
(a) of this section must be signed and
dated by a responsible official of the
importer; exporter; or producer; or by
the importer’s, exporter’s, or producer’s
authorized agent having knowledge of
the relevant facts. The certification must
include the legal name and address of
the responsible official or authorized
agent signing the certification, and
should include that person’s telephone
and e-mail address, if available. If the
person making the certification is not
the producer of the good, or the
producer’s authorized agent, the person
may sign the certification of origin
based on:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Language. The certification or
other information submitted under
paragraph
(a) of this section must be completed
either in the English or Spanish
language. If the certification or other
information is completed in Spanish,
the importer must also provide to the
port director, upon request, a written
English translation of the certification or
other information.
(e) * * *
(2) Multiple importations of identical
goods into the United States that occur
within a specified blanket period, not
exceeding 12 months. In the case of
multiple shipments of identical goods,
the certification must specify the
blanket period in ‘‘mm/dd/yyyy to mm/
dd/yyyy’’ format.
(f) Preference criteria. The preference
criterion to be included on the
certification or other information as
required in paragraph (a)(2)(vi) of this
section is as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
I 6. Section 10.412 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) and by
removing paragraph (d). The revisions
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
to paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) read as
follows:
§ 10.412
Importer obligations.
(a) General. An importer who makes
a declaration under § 10.410(a) of this
subpart is responsible for the
truthfulness of the declaration and of all
the information and data contained in
the certification or other information
submitted to CBP under § 10.411(a) of
this subpart, for submitting any
supporting documents requested by
CBP, and for the truthfulness of the
information contained in those
documents. CBP will allow for the
direct submission by the exporter or
producer of business confidential or
other sensitive information, including
cost and sourcing information.
(b) * * *
(1) Must have records that explain
how the importer came to the
conclusion that the good qualifies for
preferential tariff treatment. Those
records must include documents that
support a claim that the article in
question qualifies for preferential tariff
treatment because it meets the
applicable rules of origin set forth in
General Note 26, HTSUS, and in this
subpart. Those records may include a
properly completed certification or
other information as set forth in § 10.411
of this subpart; and
*
*
*
*
*
§ 10.413
[Amended]
7. Section 10.413 is amended by
adding the words ‘‘of this subpart’’
immediately following the reference to
‘‘§ 10.411’’ each place it appears;
I 8. Section 10.414 is amended by
revising the section heading, paragraph
(a) introductory text, and paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
I
§ 10.414 Certification or other information
not required.
(a) General. Except as otherwise
provided in paragraph (b) of this
section, an importer will not be required
to submit a certification or other
information demonstrating that the good
qualifies as originating under § 10.411(a)
of this subpart for:
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Exception. If the port director
determines that an importation
described in paragraph (a) of this
section may reasonably be considered to
have been carried out or planned for the
purpose of evading compliance with the
rules and procedures governing claims
for preference under the US-CFTA, the
port director will notify the importer in
writing that for that importation the
importer must submit to CBP a valid
certification or other information
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
demonstrating that the good qualifies as
originating. The importer must submit
such a certification or other information
within 30 calendar days from the date
of the written notice. Failure to timely
submit the certification or other
information will result in denial of the
claim for preferential tariff treatment.
9. Section 10.415 is amended by
revising the paragraph (a) introductory
text to read as follows:
I
§ 10.415
Maintenance of records.
(a) General. An importer claiming
preferential tariff treatment for a good
imported into the United States must
maintain, for five years after the date of
importation of the good, a certification
(or a copy thereof) or other information
demonstrating that the good qualifies as
originating, and any records and
documents that the importer has
relating to the origin of the good,
including records and documents
associated with:
*
*
*
*
*
10. Section 10.416 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) and by adding the
words ‘‘of this subpart’’ immediately
following the reference to ‘‘§ 10.463’’ in
paragraph (b). Revised paragraph (a)
reads as follows:
I
§ 10.416 Effect of noncompliance; failure
to provide documentation regarding
transshipment.
(a) Effect of noncompliance. If the
importer fails to comply with any
requirement under this subpart,
including submission of a certification
of origin or other information
demonstrating that the good qualifies as
originating under § 10.411(a) of this
subpart or submission of a corrected
certification under § 10.413 of this
subpart, the port director may deny
preferential tariff treatment to the
imported good.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 10.420
[Amended]
11. Section 10.420 is amended by
adding the words ‘‘of this subpart’’
immediately following each of the
references in the section to ‘‘§ 10.421,’’
‘‘§ 10.451,’’ ‘‘§ 10.421(a) or (b),’’ and
‘‘§ 10.421(c)’’;
[Amended]
12. Section § 10.421 is amended by
adding the words ‘‘of this subpart’’
immediately following the reference to
‘‘§ 10.420’’ in the introductory text and
by removing the term ‘‘HTS’’ each place
it appears in the section (and footnote)
and adding, in its place, the term
‘‘HTSUS’’;
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
§ 10.422 Submission of certificate of
eligibility.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) The legal name and address of the
responsible official or authorized agent
of the importer signing the certificate (if
different from the importer of record),
and that person’s telephone and e-mail
address, if available;
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Multiple importations of identical
goods into the United States that occur
within a specified blanket period, not
exceeding 12 months, set out in the
certificate.
§ 10.424
[Amended]
14. Section 10.424 is amended by
adding the words ‘‘of this subpart’’
immediately following the reference to
‘‘§ 10.422’’ in paragraph (a) and
immediately following the reference to
‘‘§ 10.425’’ in paragraph (b);
I
§ 10.440
[Amended]
15. Section 10.440 is amended by
removing the word ‘‘part’’ each place it
appears and adding, in its place, the
word ‘‘subpart’’;
I 16. Section 10.441 is amended by
removing the word ‘‘part’’ in paragraph
(a) and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘subpart’’, and by revising paragraphs
(b)(2) and (b)(4) to read as follows:
I
§ 10.441
Filing procedures.
*
I
§ 10.421
13. Section 10.422 is amended by
adding the words ‘‘of this subpart’’
immediately following the reference to
‘‘§ 10.421’’ in the paragraph (a)
introductory text, by re-designating
current paragraphs (a)(2)(ii) through
(a)(2)(vii) as paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)
through (a)(2)(viii), respectively, by
adding a new paragraph (a)(2)(ii), and
by revising paragraph (d)(2). New
paragraph (a)(2)(ii) and revised
paragraph (d)(2) read as follows:
I
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Subject to § 10.413 of this subpart,
a copy of a certification of origin or
other information demonstrating that
the good qualifies for preferential tariff
treatment;
*
*
*
*
*
(4) A written statement indicating
whether or not any person has filed a
protest relating to the good under any
provision of law; and if any such protest
has been filed, the statement must
identify the protest by number and date.
I 17. Section 10.442 is amended by
removing the word ‘‘part’’ each place it
appears in paragraphs (a) and (d)(1) and
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
76133
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘subpart’’,
and by revising the heading and text of
paragraph (b), the second sentence of
paragraph (c)(2), paragraph (d)(2), and
the second and third sentences of
paragraph (d)(3). The revisions to
paragraphs (b), (c)(2), (d)(2) and (d)(3)
read as follows:
§ 10.442
CBP processing procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Pending protest or judicial review.
If the port director determines that any
protest relating to the good has not been
finally decided, the port director will
suspend action on the claim for refund
filed under this subpart until the
decision on the protest becomes final. If
a summons involving the tariff
classification or dutiability of the good
is filed in the Court of International
Trade, the port director will suspend
action on the claim for refund filed
under this subpart until judicial review
has been completed.
(c) * * *
(2) * * * If the entry is otherwise to
be reliquidated based on administrative
review of a protest or as a result of
judicial review, the port director will
reliquidate the entry taking into account
the claim for refund under this subpart.
(d) * * *
(2) Unliquidated entry. If the port
director determines that a claim for a
refund filed under this subpart should
be denied and the entry covering the
good has not been liquidated, the port
director will deny the claim in
connection with the liquidation of the
entry, and notice of the denial and the
reason for the denial will be provided to
the importer in writing or via an
authorized electronic data interchange
system.
(3) * * * If the entry is otherwise to
be reliquidated based on administrative
review of a protest or as a result of
judicial review, such reliquidation may
include denial of the claim filed under
this subpart. In either case, the port
director will give the importer notice of
the denial and the reason for the denial
in writing or via an authorized
electronic data interchange system.
§ 10.450
[Amended]
18. Section 10.450 is amended by
adding the words ‘‘of this subpart’’
immediately following the reference to
‘‘§§ 10.450 through 10.463’’ in the
introductory text.
I 19. Section 10.455 is amended by
revising paragraph (a)(1), the heading to
paragraph (b), and paragraphs (b)(1)(i),
(b)(2)(i), and (c) to read as follows:
I
§ 10.455
Value of materials.
(a) * * *
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
76134
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 20, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
(1) In the case of a material imported
by the producer of the good, the
adjusted value of the material with
respect to that importation;
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Permissible additions to, and
deductions from, the value of materials.
*
*
*
*
*
(1) * * *
(i) The costs of freight, insurance,
packing and all other costs incurred in
transporting the material to the location
of the producer;
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(i) The costs of freight, insurance,
packing and all other costs incurred in
transporting the material to the location
of the producer;
(c) Accounting method. Any cost or
value referenced in General Note 26(n),
HTSUS, and this subpart, must be
recorded and maintained in accordance
with the generally accepted accounting
principles applicable in the territory of
the Party in which the good is produced
(whether Chile or the United States).
§ 10.457
[Amended]
20. In § 10.457, paragraph (a)(4) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘country’’ each place it appears and
adding, in its place, the word ‘‘Party’’.
I
§ 10.458
27. In § 10.483, paragraph (a)(2) is
amended by removing the word ‘‘part’’
and adding, in its place, the word
‘‘chapter,’’ and paragraph (c)
introductory text is revised to read as
follows:
22. Section 10.460 is amended by
removing the term ‘‘§ 10.402(n)’’ and
adding, in its place, the term
‘‘§ 10.402(o)’’.
§ 10.483 Framework for correcting
declarations and certifications.
[Amended]
23. Section 10.461 is amended by
adding in Example 1 the words ‘‘of this
subpart’’ at the end of the parenthetical
phrase ‘‘see § 10.454(a)’’ in the third
sentence.
I 24. In § 10.470, paragraph (a) is
amended by revising the heading and
the first two sentences of the
introductory text, to read as follows:
I
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
§ 10.470 Verification and justification of
claim for preferential tariff treatment.
(a) Verification. A claim for
preferential tariff treatment made under
§ 10.410 of this subpart, including any
statements or other information
submitted to CBP in support of the
claim, will be subject to such
verification as the port director deems
necessary. In the event that the port
director is provided with insufficient
17:07 Dec 19, 2006
[Amended]
I
I
Jkt 211001
§ 191.0
[Amended]
29. Section 191.0 is amended by
removing the last sentence.
I
Deborah J. Spero,
Acting Commissioner, Customs and Border
Protection.
Approved: December 15, 2006.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 06–9780 Filed 12–19–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
If CBP determines, as a result of an
origin verification initiated under this
subpart, that the good which is the
subject of the verification does not
qualify as an originating good, it will
issue a determination in writing or via
an authorized electronic data
interchange system to the importer that
sets forth the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) With specific reference to the rules
applicable to originating goods as set
forth in General Note 26, HTSUS, and
in §§ 10.450 through 10.463 of this
subpart, the legal basis for the
determination; and
*
*
*
*
*
26. Section 10.474 is amended by
removing the words ‘‘CBP finds’’ and
adding, in their place, the words
‘‘verification or other information
reveals’’;
[Amended]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
§ 10.473 Issuance of negative origin
determinations.
I
[Amended]
21. In § 10.458, paragraph (a) is
amended by removing the word
‘‘country’’ each it appears and adding,
in its place, the word ‘‘Party’’.
§ 10.461
25. Section 10.473 is amended by
revising the introductory text and
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
I
§ 10.474
I
§ 10.460
information to verify or substantiate the
claim, the port director may deny the
claim for preferential tariff treatment.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Statement. For purposes of this
subpart, each corrected declaration or
notification of an incorrect certification
must be accompanied by a statement,
submitted in writing or via an
authorized electronic data interchange
system, which:
*
*
*
*
*
PART 191—DRAWBACK
28. The general authority citation for
part 191 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202
(General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States), 1313, 1624.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00024
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9302]
RIN 1545–BC34
Prohibited Allocations of Securities in
an S Corporation
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains final
regulations that provide guidance
concerning requirements under section
409(p) of the Internal Revenue Code for
employee stock ownership plans
(ESOPs) holding stock of Subchapter S
corporations. These final regulations
generally affect plan sponsors of, and
participants in, ESOPs holding stock of
Subchapter S corporations.
DATES: Effective Date: These regulations
are effective December 20, 2006.
Applicability Dates: These regulations
are generally applicable with respect to
plan years beginning on or after January
1, 2006. See the Effective Date section
of the preamble for specific information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
T. Ricotta or Veronica A. Rouse at (202)
622–6090 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains final
regulations (26 CFR Part 1) under
section 409(p) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code).
Section 409(p)(1) requires an ESOP
holding employer securities consisting
of stock in an S corporation to provide
that, during an allocation year, no
portion of the assets of the plan
attributable to, or allocable in lieu of,
the employer securities may accrue (or
be allocated directly or indirectly under
any plan of the employer meeting the
E:\FR\FM\20DER1.SGM
20DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 20, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 76127-76134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9780]
[[Page 76127]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
19 CFR Parts 10 and 191
[CBP Dec. 06-39]
RIN 1505-AB47
United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement
AGENCIES: Customs and Border Protection, Depart of Homeland Security;
Department of the Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document adopts as a final rule, with some changes,
interim amendments to title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(``CFR'') which were published in the Federal Register on March 7,
2005, as CBP Dec. 05-07 to implement the preferential tariff treatment
and other customs-related provisions of the United States-Chile Free
Trade Agreement signed by the United States and the Republic of Chile.
DATES: Final rule effective January 19, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Textile Operational Aspects: Robert Abels, Office of Field
Operations, (202) 344-1959.
Other Operational Aspects: Lori Whitehurst, Office of Field
Operations, (202) 344-2722.
Audit Aspects: Mark Hanson, Office of Regulatory Audit, (202) 344-
2877.
Legal Aspects: Edward Leigh, Office of International Trade, (202)
572-8827.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On June 6, 2003, the United States and the Republic of Chile (the
``Parties'') signed the U.S.-Chile Free Trade Agreement (``US-CFTA'').
The provisions of the US-CFTA were adopted by the United States with
the enactment of the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act (the ``Act''), Public Law 108-77, 117 Stat. 909 (19
U.S.C. 3805 note), on September 3, 2003. Section 210 of the Act
requires that regulations be prescribed as necessary.
Those customs-related US-CFTA provisions which require
implementation through regulation include certain tariff and non-tariff
provisions within Chapter Three (National Treatment and Market Access
for Goods) and the provisions of Chapter Four (Rules of Origin and
Origin Procedures) and Chapter Five (Customs Administration).
The tariff-related provisions within US-CFTA Chapter Three which
require regulatory action by CBP are Article 3.7 (Temporary Admission
of Goods), Article 3.9 (Goods Re-Entered after Repair or Alteration),
and Article 3.20 (Rules of Origin and Related Matters).
Chapter Four of the US-CFTA sets forth the rules for determining
whether an imported good qualifies as an originating good of the United
States or Chile (US-CFTA Party) and, as such, is therefore eligible for
preferential tariff (duty-free or reduced duty) treatment as provided
for under Article 4.1 and Annex 4.1 of the US-CFTA. Under Article 4.1
within that Chapter, originating goods may be grouped in three broad
categories: (1) Goods which are wholly obtained or produced entirely in
one or both of the Parties; (2) goods which are produced entirely in
one or both of the Parties and which satisfy the specific rules of
origin in US-CFTA Annex 4.1 (change in tariff classification
requirement and/or regional value content requirement); and (3) goods
which are produced entirely in one or both of the Parties exclusively
from materials that originate in those countries. Article 4.2 sets
forth the methods for calculating the regional value content of a good.
Article 4.3 sets forth the rules for determining the value of materials
for purposes of calculating the regional value content of a good and
applying the de minimis rule. Article 4.4 sets forth the rules for
determining whether accessories, spare parts, or tools delivered with a
good qualify as material used in the production of such good. Article
4.6 provides for accumulation of production by two or more producers.
Article 4.7 provides a de minimis criterion. The remaining Articles
within Section A of Chapter Four consist of additional sub-rules,
applicable to the originating good concept, involving fungible
materials, packaging materials, packing materials, transshipment, and
non-qualifying operations. The basic rules of origin in Chapter Four of
the US-CFTA are set forth in General Note 26, Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). In addition, Section B of
Chapter Four sets forth the procedural requirements which apply under
the US-CFTA, in particular with regard to claims for preferential
tariff treatment.
Chapter Five sets forth the customs operational provisions related
to the implementation and continued administration of the US-CFTA.
On March 7, 2005, Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') published
CBP Dec. 05-07 in the Federal Register (70 FR 10868) setting forth
interim amendments to implement the preferential tariff treatment and
other customs-related provisions of the US-CFTA. In order to provide
transparency and facilitate their use, the majority of the US-CFTA
implementing regulations set forth in CBP Dec. 05-07 were included
within new Subpart H in Part 10 of title 19 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (19 CFR Subpart H, Part 10). However, in those cases in
which US-CFTA implementation was more appropriate in the context of an
existing regulatory provision, the US-CFTA regulatory text was
incorporated in an existing part within the CBP regulations. CBP Dec.
05-07 also set forth a number of cross-references and other
consequential changes to existing regulatory provisions to clarify the
relationship between those existing provisions and the new US-CFTA
implementing regulations.
Although the interim regulatory amendments were promulgated without
prior public notice and comment procedures and took effect on March 7,
2005, CBP Dec. 05-07 provided for the submission of public comments
which would be considered before adoption of the interim regulations as
a final rule, and the prescribed public comment period closed on June
6, 2005. A discussion of the comments received by CBP is set forth
below.
Discussion of Comments
A total of three commenters responded to the solicitation of
comments on the interim regulations set forth in CBP Dec. 05-07. The
comments are discussed below.
Comment:
One commenter stated that Sec. Sec. 10.412 and 10.415, which
concern importer obligations and maintenance of records, respectively,
should make clear that importers are required to retain records and
documents related to the production of goods for which preferential
tariff treatment is claimed only to the extent that they possess such
records in the normal course of business. The commenter explained that,
in many cases involving unrelated parties, Chilean producers may be
unwilling to share their production information and costs with the U.S.
importer.
CBP's Response:
CBP recognizes that, under certain circumstances, Chilean producers
may be reluctant to provide production information and costs to U.S.
importers due to business confidentiality concerns. In these cases, CBP
has no objection to the direct submission to the port director of such
information from
[[Page 76128]]
the exporter or producer. To clarify this point, CBP is amending Sec.
10.412 in this final rule by adding a sentence at the end of paragraph
(a) stating that CBP will allow for the direct submission by the
exporter or producer of business confidential or other sensitive
information, including cost and sourcing information. Regarding Sec.
10.415, CBP notes that paragraph (a) of that section provides, in
pertinent part, that an importer claiming preferential tariff treatment
must maintain for five years after the date of importation of the good
``* * * any records and documents that the importer has relating to the
origin of the good * * *.'' [Emphasis added.] CBP submits that the
current language of the regulation adequately addresses the
commenters's concerns.
Comment:
One commenter noted that Sec. Sec. 10.441 and 10.442, concerning
procedures for the filing and processing of post-importation duty-
refund claims, set forth several references to the words ``petition or
request for reliquidation.'' The commenter asks whether these
references are necessary in view of the fact that 19 U.S.C. 1520(c) was
repealed by section 2105 of the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical
Corrections Act of 2004 (Pub. L. 108-429, 118 Stat. 2434).
CBP's Response:
Section 1520(c), which authorized the reliquidation of an entry
under certain circumstances, was repealed effective December 18, 2004
(see Sec. 2108 of the Miscellaneous Trade and Technical Corrections
Act of 2004). As a result, CBP agrees with the commenter that the
references to ``petition or request for reliquidation'' in Sec. Sec.
10.441(b)(4) and 10.442(b), (c)(2), and (d)(3) are no longer necessary.
These references have been removed in this final rule document.
Comment:
One commenter stated that Sec. 10.455(a)(3), concerning the value
of materials, is too broad because ``it would preclude transaction
value as the value of a material where the material is provided to the
producer at a price reflecting any discount or reduction in price,''
including quantity discounts. [Emphasis by commenter.] The commenter
suggested that the wording of this paragraph should parallel the
definition of assists in Sec. 152.102(a) of the CBP regulations; e.g.,
``In the case of a material provided to the producer free of charge or
at reduced cost * * *.''
CBP's Response:
First, CBP assumes that, by using the term ``transaction value,''
the commenter meant to refer to ``adjusted value'' or ``the price
actually paid or payable,'' as those terms are used in paragraphs
(a)(1) and (a)(2) of Sec. 10.455. Second, the language ``* * * or at a
price reflecting a discount or similar reduction * * *.'' in Sec.
10.455(a)(3) was taken verbatim from Article 4.3 of the US-CFTA and
section 202(e) of the Act. CBP is bound by this statutory language and
cannot make the substantive change suggested by the commenter. CBP
notes that the effect of this provision is to prevent the value of
originating materials from being understated for purposes of origin
determination by the type of common discounts to which the commenter
has referred.
Comment:
One commenter stated that Sec. 10.483(c)(2), relating to voluntary
corrections of declarations, should be revised to clarify that the
affected import transactions should be identified ``to the extent
possible.'' According to the commenter, in some cases, unrelated
exporters will not have details (such as the date and port of
importation) on the import transactions that were affected by the
incorrect declaration.
CBP's Response:
Section 10.410(b) states that it is the responsibility of the U.S.
importer (not the exporter) to make a corrected declaration. The
importer clearly should be able to identify from its records the import
transactions affected by the incorrect declaration, including the port
and approximate date of each importation. For this reason, CBP declines
to make the change to Sec. 10.483(c)(2) suggested by the commenter.
Comment:
Two commenters noted that CBP Dec. 05-07 amended the scope
section(Sec. 191.0) in Part 191 of the CBP regulations, relating to
drawback, to provide a cross-reference to the US-CFTA drawback
provisions contained in new Subpart H of Part 10. However, the
commenters stated that they were unable to find any provisions in
Subpart H which discuss the subject of drawback.
CBP's Response:
Although CBP originally intended to include regulations which
address the subject of drawback in new Subpart H of Part 10, it was
subsequently determined that no such regulations were necessary as the
drawback provisions in Part 191 were sufficient for purposes of the US-
CFTA. However, CBP neglected to delete the amendment to Sec. 191.0 set
forth in CBP Dec. 05-07, as noted by the commenter. That error has been
corrected in this final rule document.
Additional Changes to the Regulations
In addition to the regulatory changes identified and discussed
above in connection with the discussion of public comments received in
response to CBP Dec. 05-07, the final rulemaking text set forth below
incorporates the following additional changes which CBP believes are
necessary based on further internal review of the interim regulatory
text:
1. In Sec. 10.401, relating to the scope of Subpart H:
a. The words ``entered into'' in the first sentence have been
replaced by the word ``signed'' to avoid any potential confusion
between the date that the US-CFTA was signed (June 6, 2003) and the
date that it entered into force (January 1, 2004); and
b. The reference to Part 191 in the third sentence has been removed
consistent with the removal of the cross-reference to Subpart H, Part
10 in Sec. 191.0, as discussed in the comment discussion above;
2. In Sec. 10.402, which sets forth general definitions:
a. The definition of ``claim for preferential tariff treatment'' in
paragraph (c) has been revised to add the words ``and to an exemption
from the merchandise processing fee'' at the end of the definition to
clarify that the term encompasses a claim that a good is entitled to an
exemption from the merchandise processing fee (see Sec. 24.23(c)(7) of
the CBP regulations);
b. The definition of ``national'' (formerly paragraph (o)) has been
removed as that term is not used in Subpart H of Part 10;
c. A definition of ``identical goods'' has been added as new
paragraph (n). This definition was set forth in Sec. Sec. 10.411(d)(2)
and 10.422(d)(2) of the interim regulatory text but has been removed
from those provisions and inserted into the general definitions section
for the reason that the term also appears in Sec. 10.474, and the
definition is equally applicable to all three provisions. In addition,
the definition has been modified slightly by replacing the word
``production'' with the words ``particular rule of origin,'' which CBP
believes more accurately describe the means by which a good is
determined to qualify as originating;
d. As a result of the removal of the definition of ``national'' and
the addition of a definition for ``identical goods'' discussed above,
current paragraph (n), setting forth the definition of ``indirect
material,'' has been re-designated as paragraph (o), and a conforming
change has been made to Sec. 10.460 to reflect the re-designation of
this paragraph; and
[[Page 76129]]
e. The definition of ``preferential tariff treatment'' in paragraph
(s) has been revised to add the words ``, and an exemption from the
merchandise processing fee'' at the end of the definition to clarify
that the term includes an exemption from the merchandise processing
fee.
3. In Sec. 10.410, relating to the filing of a claim for
preferential tariff treatment:
a. Paragraph (a) has been revised to add the words ``including an
exemption from the merchandise processing fee,'' immediately following
the words ``under the US-CFTA,'' in the first sentence to clarify that
a claim for preferential tariff treatment for an originating good under
the US-CFTA includes a claim that the good is entitled to an exemption
from the merchandise processing fee;
b. Paragraph (b) has been revised to add the words ``or other
information'' immediately following the word ``certification'',
consistent with the wording in the corresponding provision in the US-
CFTA (see Article 4.12.1(c)); and
c. Paragraph (b) has been further revised to provide that a
corrected declaration may be effected by submission of a statement
``via an authorized electronic data interchange system,'' as an
alternative to submission of a written statement, consistent with CBP's
movement toward a paperless environment;
4. In Sec. 10.411, relating to the certification of origin:
a. The heading to Sec. 10.411 and the paragraph (a) introductory
text have been revised to add the words ``or other information'' after
``certification'' and ``certification of origin'' to conform to the
wording in Articles 4.12.1(b) and 4.14.1 of the US-CFTA, which
reference the importer's obligation to submit a certificate of origin
or other information demonstrating that the good qualifies as
originating;
b. Paragraph (a)(2)(iv) has been modified to add the words ``for
which preferential tariff treatment is claimed'' immediately following
the word ``good'' for clarification purposes;
c. Paragraph (a)(2)(vii), relating to multiple shipments of
identical goods, has been removed and incorporated (in slightly revised
form) into re-designated paragraph (e)(2) (formerly paragraph (d)(2))
to clarify that this provision applies to certifications but not to
``other information'' submitted pursuant to Sec. 10.411(a);
d. Paragraph (a)(3), which sets forth the certifying statement to
be included on the certification of origin, has been removed and re-
designated as new paragraph (b) and a heading has been added. This
change clarifies that the statement is required on the certification
but not when ``other information'' is submitted pursuant to Sec.
10.411(a);
e. As a result of the insertion of new paragraph (b), as discussed
above, paragraphs (b) through (e) of the interim regulatory text have
been re-designated as paragraphs (c) through (f), respectively;
f. Re-designated paragraph (c) (formerly paragraph (b)), which
concerns who may sign the certification, has been revised to require
that the certification of origin include the legal name and address of
the responsible official or authorized agent signing the certification,
and also to ask for the telephone and e-mail address when available.
This information is necessary in the event that the person signing the
certification is not identified pursuant to paragraphs (a)(2)(i)
through (a)(2)(iii) of Sec. 10.411; and
g. Re-designated paragraphs (d) and (f) (formerly paragraphs (c)
and (e), respectively) have been revised to add the words ``or other
information'' immediately following the word ``certification,''
consistent with the changes to paragraph (a) discussed above;
5. In Sec. 10.412, relating to importer obligations:
a. Paragraph (a) has been revised to add the words ``or other
information submitted to CBP under Sec. 10.411(a) of this subpart''
immediately following the word ``certification'', consistent with the
change to the Sec. 10.411(a) introductory text discussed above;
b. The paragraph (b) introductory text and paragraph (b)(1) have
been revised to add the word ``tariff'' between the words
``preferential'' and ``treatment'' each place they appear for
clarification purposes and consistent with other references to these
words throughout Subpart H. Paragraph (b)(1) has been further revised
to add the words ``or other information'' immediately following the
word ``certification'', consistent with the change to the Sec.
10.411(a) introductory text discussed above; and
c. Paragraph (d), which stated that ``* * * importers are expected
to establish and implement internal controls which provide for the
periodic review of the accuracy of the certifications or other records
referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section,'' has been removed as
there is no basis of authority for this provision in the US-CFTA or the
Act;
6. In Sec. 10.413, concerning the validity of the certification,
the words ``of this subpart'' have been added immediately following the
reference to ``Sec. 10.411'' each place it appears for clarification
purposes;
7. In Sec. 10.414, which sets forth the circumstances under which
a certification is not required:
a. The section heading, paragraph (a) introductory text, and
paragraph (b) have been revised to add the words ``or other
information'' immediately following the word ``certification'' each
place it appears, consistent with the change to the Sec. 10.411(a)
introductory text discussed above; and
b. The paragraph (a) introductory text has been further revised to
replace the words ``for preferential tariff treatment'' with the words
``as originating under Sec. 10.411(a),'' consistent with the wording
in Sec. 10.411(a);
8. In Sec. 10.415, concerning maintenance of records, the
paragraph (a) introductory text has been revised:
a. To add the word ``tariff'' between the words ``preferential''
and treatment'' for clarification purposes and consistent with other
references to these words throughout Subpart H;
b. To add the words ``or other information'' immediately following
the word ``certification'', consistent with the change to the Sec.
10.411(a) introductory text discussed above; and
c. To remove the words ``in the United States'' to conform to the
corresponding provision in the US-CFTA (see Article 4.14.3), which
includes no restriction on where the records referenced in that
provision must be maintained;
9. In Sec. 10.416, relating to the consequences of failing to
comply with the requirements of Subpart H:
a. Paragraph (a) has been revised to add the words ``or other
information demonstrating that the good qualifies as originating''
immediately following the word ``certification'', consistent with the
change to the Sec. 10.411(a) introductory text discussed above; and
b. Paragraph (b) has been revised to add the words ``of this
subpart'' immediately following the reference to ``Sec. 10.463'' for
clarification purposes;
10. In Sec. 10.420, relating to the filing of a tariff preference
level (TPL) claim, the words ``of this subpart'' have been added
immediately following each of the references to ``Sec. 10.421'',
``Sec. 10.451'', ``Sec. 10.421(a) or (b)'', and ``Sec. 10.421(c)''
for clarification purposes;
11. In Sec. 10.421, concerning goods eligible for TPL claims:
a. The words ``of this subpart'' have been added immediately
following the reference to ``Sec. 10.420'' in the introductory text
for clarification purposes; and
b. The term ``HTS'' has been replaced each place it appears
(including the
[[Page 76130]]
footnote) with the correct term ``HTSUS'' (see Sec. 10.402(m));
12. In Sec. 10.422, relating to the TPL certificate of
eligibility:
a. The paragraph (a) introductory text has been revised to add the
words ``of this subpart'' immediately following the reference to
``Sec. 10.421'' for clarification purposes;
b. Paragraph (a)(2), which sets forth the information to be
included on the certificate of eligibility, has been modified to
require (in new paragraph (a)(2)(ii)) that the certificate include the
legal name and address of the responsible official or authorized agent
of the importer signing the certificate (if different from the importer
of record), and also to ask for the telephone and e-mail address when
available. Similar to the change to Sec. 10.411(c) discussed above,
this change is necessary in the event that the person signing the
certificate of eligibility is not identified pursuant to Sec.
10.422(a)(2)(i);
c. As a result of the addition of new paragraph (a)(2)(ii), as
discussed above, paragraphs (a)(2)(ii) through (a)(2)(vii) of the
interim regulatory text have been re-designated as paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii) through (a)(2)(viii), respectively; and
d. The reference to ``certification'' in paragraph (d)(2) has been
replaced with the correct word ``certificate;''
13. In Sec. 10.424, concerning the effect of noncompliance with
applicable TPL requirements, the words ``of this subpart'' have been
added immediately following the reference to ``Sec. 10.422'' in
paragraph (a) and the reference to ``Sec. 10.425'' in paragraph (b)
for clarification purposes;
14. In Sec. 10.440, relating to the right to make post-importation
duty refund claims, the word ``part'' has been replaced each place it
appears with the correct word ``subpart'';
15. In Sec. 10.441, relating to the procedures for filing post-
importation claims:
a. Paragraphs (a) and (b)(2) have been revised to replace the word
``part'' each place it appears with the correct word ``subpart''; and
b. Paragraph (b)(2) has been further revised to add the words ``or
other information demonstrating'' immediately following the word
``certification'', consistent with the change to the Sec. 10.411(a)
introductory text discussed above;
16. In Sec. 10.442, relating to CBP processing procedures for
post-importation claims:
a. The word ``part'' in paragraphs (a) and (d)(1) has been replaced
each place it appears with the correct word ``subpart'';
b. The words ``for refund'' have been added immediately following
the word ``claim'' in the first and second sentences of paragraph (b)
for clarification purposes; and
c. Paragraphs (d)((2) and (d)(3) have been revised to provide that
notice of a denial of a claim for a refund may be made ``via an
authorized electronic data interchange system,'' as an alternative to
the issuance of a written notice, consistent with CBP's movement toward
a paperless environment;
17. In Sec. 10.450, which sets forth definitions regarding the
rules of origin, the words ``of this subpart'' have been added
immediately following the reference to ``Sec. Sec. 10.450 through
10.463'' in the introductory text for clarification purposes:
18. In Sec. 10.455, relating to the value of materials:
a. Paragraph (a)(1) has been revised to add the words ``with
respect to that importation'' at the end of the paragraph to conform to
the wording in the corresponding statutory provision (see Sec.
202(e)(1)(A) of the Act);
b. The heading to paragraph (b) (``Adjustments to value'') has been
changed to read ``Permissible additions to, and deductions from, the
value of materials'' to avoid any potential confusion between the
heading to this paragraph and the term ``adjusted value;''
c. Paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (b)(2)(i) have been revised to delete
the words ``within or between the territory of Chile, the United
States, or both'' to conform these paragraphs to the wording in the
corresponding statutory provisions (see Sec. 202(e)(2)(A)(i) and
(B)(i) of the Act), respectively; and
d. Paragraph (c) has been modified to replace the term ``country,''
which is not defined in Subpart H, with the more appropriate term
``Party,'' which is defined in Sec. 10.402(q);
19. In Sec. Sec. 10.457(a) and 10.458(a), concerning fungible
goods and materials, and accumulation, respectively, the term
``country'' has been replaced each place it appears with the more
appropriate term ``Party;''
20. In Sec. 10.461, relating to indirect materials, Example 1 has
been revised to add the words ``of this subpart'' at the end of the
parenthetical phrase ``see Sec. 10.454(a)'' in the third sentence;
21. In Sec. 10.470, relating to verification of claims for
preferential tariff treatment:
a. The section heading has been revised to add the word ``tariff''
between the words ``preferential'' and ``treatment'';
b. The heading to paragraph (a) has been revised to remove the
words ``by CBP'' to allow for the possibility that another U.S.
Government agency may assist in a verification; and
c. The first sentence of the paragraph (a) introductory text has
been revised to add the word ``tariff'' between the words
``preferential'' and ``treatment'' and to add the words ``of this
subpart'' immediately following the reference to ``Sec. 10.410''.
d. The second sentence of the paragraph (a) introductory text has
been revised to replace the words ``for any reason is prevented from
verifying'' with the words ``is provided with insufficient information
to verify or substantiate'', and to add the word ``tariff'' between the
words ``preferential'' and ``treatment''. The former change recognizes
that the words ``for any reason'' may be interpreted too broadly and
result in the denial of a claim for reasons beyond the control of the
parties to an import transaction. This new wording more accurately
reflects the circumstances under which a verification may result in the
denial of a claim--the failure to provide sufficient information to
verify or substantiate the claim for preferential tariff treatment;
22. In Sec. 10.473, concerning notice of a negative origin
determination:
a. The incorrect reference to ``section''` in the introductory text
has been replaced with the correct word ``subpart'';
b. The introductory text has been further revised to provide for
the issuance of a negative origin determination ``via an authorized
electronic data interchange system,'' as an alternative to the issuance
of a written determination, consistent with CBP's movement toward a
paperless environment; and
c. Paragraph (c) has been revised to replace the words ``the `Rules
of Origin' heading under this subpart'' with the words ``Sec. Sec.
10.450 through 10.463 of this subpart'' to provide more clarity
regarding the regulatory provisions to which this paragraph is
referring;
23. In Sec. 10.474, relating to repeated false or unsupported
preference claims, the words ``CBP finds'' have been replaced with the
words ``verification or other information reveals'' to more accurately
reflect the wording in Sec. 205(g) of the Act, which provides, in
pertinent part, that ``[i]f the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
or the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement finds indications
of a pattern of conduct * * *.'' [Emphasis added.];
24. In Sec. 10.483, concerning the framework for correcting
declarations and certifications:
[[Page 76131]]
a. The incorrect reference to ``part'' in paragraph (a)(2) has been
replaced by the correct word ``chapter''; and
b. Paragraph (c) has been revised to remove the word ``Written'' in
the heading and by providing in the introductory text for the
submission of a statement ``via an authorized electronic data
interchange system,'' as an alternative to the submission of a written
statement, consistent with the change described above in regard to
Sec. 10.410(b);
Conclusion
Accordingly, based on the comments received and the analysis of
those comments as set forth above, and based on the additional
considerations discussed above, CBP believes that the interim
regulations published as CBP Dec. 05-07 should be adopted as a final
rule with certain changes as discussed above and as set forth below.
Executive Order 12866
CBP has determined that this document is not a regulation or rule
subject to the provisions of Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993 (58 FR 51735, October 1993), because it pertains to a foreign
affairs function of the United States and implements an international
agreement and, therefore, is specifically exempted by section 3(d)(2)
of Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The regulations to implement the preferential tariff treatment and
other customs-related provisions of the US-CFTA were previously
published in CBP Dec. 05-07 as interim regulations. CBP issued the
regulations as an interim rule because it had determined that: (1) They
involve the foreign affairs function of the United States pursuant to
section 553(a)(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA); and (2)
prior public notice and comment procedures on these regulations were
impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest
pursuant to section 553(b)(B) of the APA. Because no notice of proposed
rulemaking was required, the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. Accordingly, this
final rule is not subject to the regulatory analysis requirements or
other requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The collection of information contained in this final rule has
previously been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and
Budget in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1651-0117. The collection of
information in these regulations is in Sec. Sec. 10.410 and 10.411.
This information is used by CBP to determine eligibility for a tariff
preference or other rights or benefits under the US-CFTA and the Act.
The likely respondents are business organizations including importers,
exporters and manufacturers.
The estimated average annual burden associated with the collection
of information in this final rule is 0.2 hours per respondent or
recordkeeper. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate
and suggestions for reducing this burden should be directed to the
Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Department of the Treasury, Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Washington, DC 20503. A copy should also be sent to the Trade
and Commercial Regulations Branch, Regulations and Rulings, Bureau of
Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (Mint
Annex), Washington, DC 20229.
Signing Authority
This document is being issued in accordance with Sec. 0.1(a)(1) of
the CBP regulations (19 CFR 0.1(a)(1)) pertaining to the authority of
the Secretary of the Treasury (or his/her delegate) to approve
regulations related to certain customs revenue functions.
List of Subjects
19 CFR Part 10
Alterations, Bonds, Customs duties and inspection, Exports,
Imports, Preference programs, Repairs, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Trade agreements (United States-Chile Free Trade
Agreement).
19 CFR Part 191
Commerce, Customs duties and inspection, Drawback, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Trade agreements.
Amendments to the Regulations
0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending parts 10, 24, 162, 163, 178, and
191 of the CBP regulations (19 CFR parts 10, 24, 162, 163, 178, and
191), which was published at 70 FR 10868 on March 7, 2005, is adopted
as a final rule with certain changes as discussed above and set forth
below.
PART 10--ARTICLES CONDITIONALLY FREE, SUBJECT TO A REDUCED RATE,
ETC.
0
1. The general authority citation for part 10 and the specific
authority for subpart H continue to read as follows:
Authority: 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1321, 1481, 1484, 1498, 1508,
1623, 1624, 3314;
* * * * *
Sections 10.401 through 10.490 also issued under Pub. L. 108-77,
117 Stat. 909 (19 U.S.C. 3805 note).
Sec. 10.401 [Amended]
0
2. Section 10.401 is amended by removing the words ``entered into'' in
the first sentence and adding, in their place, the word ``signed'', by
adding the word ``and'' immediately prior to the number ``163'' in the
third sentence, and by removing the words ``and 191'' in the third
sentence;
0
3. Section 10.402 is amended by revising paragraph (c), removing
current paragraph (o), re-designating current paragraph (n) as
paragraph (o), adding a new paragraph (n), and revising paragraph (s).
The revisions and addition to Sec. 10.402 read as follows:
Sec. 10.402 General definitions.
* * * * *
(c) Claim for preferential tariff treatment. ``Claim for
preferential tariff treatment'' means a claim that a good is entitled
to the duty rate applicable under the US-CFTA and to an exemption from
the merchandise processing fee;
* * * * *
(n) Identical goods. ``Identical goods'' means goods that are the
same in all respects relevant to the particular rule of origin that
qualifies the goods as originating;
* * * * *
(s) Preferential tariff treatment. ``Preferential tariff
treatment'' means the duty rate applicable to an originating good under
the US-CFTA, and an exemption from the merchandise processing fee.
* * * * *
0
4. Section 10.410 is amended by adding the words ``including an
exemption from the merchandise processing fee,'' immediately following
the words ``under the US-CFTA,'' in the first sentence of paragraph (a)
and by revising paragraph (b). Revised paragraph (b) reads as follows:
Sec. 10.410 Filing of claim for preferential tariff treatment upon
importation.
* * * * *
[[Page 76132]]
(b) Corrected declaration. If, after making the declaration
required under paragraph (a) of this section, the U.S. importer has
reason to believe that the declaration or the certification or other
information on which the declaration was based contains information
that is not correct, the importer must, within 30 calendar days after
the date of discovery of the error, make a corrected declaration and
pay any duties that may be due. A corrected declaration will be
effected by submission of a letter or other statement either in writing
or via an authorized electronic data interchange system to the CBP
office where the original declaration was filed specifying the
correction (see Sec. Sec. 10.482 and 10.483 of this subpart);
0
5. In Sec. 10.411:
0
a. The section heading is revised;
0
b. Paragraph (a) is amended by revising the introductory text and
paragraph (a)(2)(iv) and by removing paragraphs (a)(2)(vii) and (a)(3);
0
c. Current paragraphs (b), (c), (d), and (e) are re-designated as
paragraphs (c), (d), (e), and (f), respectively;
0
d. A new paragraph (b) is added;
0
e. The introductory text of re-designated paragraph (c) is revised;
0
f. Re-designated paragraphs (d) and (e)(2) and the introductory text to
re-designated paragraph (f) are revised.
The additions and revisions to Sec. 10.411 read as follows:
Sec. 10.411 Certification of origin or other information.
(a) Contents. An importer who claims preferential tariff treatment
on a good must submit, at the request of the port director, a
certification of origin or other information demonstrating that the
good qualifies as originating. A certification or other information
submitted to CBP under this paragraph:
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) A description of the good for which preferential tariff
treatment is claimed, which must be sufficiently detailed to relate it
to the invoice and the HS nonmenclature;
* * * * *
(b) Statement. A certification submitted to CBP under paragraph (a)
of this section must include a statement, in substantially the
following form:
``I Certify that:
The information on this document is true and accurate and I assume
the responsibility for proving such representations. I understand that
I am liable for any false statements or material omissions made on or
in connection with this document;
I agree to maintain, and present upon request, documentation
necessary to support this certification, and to inform, in writing, all
persons to whom the certification was given of any changes that could
affect the accuracy or validity of this certification; and
The goods originated in the territory of one or more of the
parties, and comply with the origin requirements specified for those
goods in the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement; there has been
no further production or any other operation outside the territories of
the parties, other than unloading, reloading, or any other operation
necessary to preserve it in good condition or to transport the good to
the United States; and
This document consists of ---- pages, including all attachments.''
(c) Responsible official or agent. A certification submitted under
paragraph (a) of this section must be signed and dated by a responsible
official of the importer; exporter; or producer; or by the importer's,
exporter's, or producer's authorized agent having knowledge of the
relevant facts. The certification must include the legal name and
address of the responsible official or authorized agent signing the
certification, and should include that person's telephone and e-mail
address, if available. If the person making the certification is not
the producer of the good, or the producer's authorized agent, the
person may sign the certification of origin based on:
* * * * *
(d) Language. The certification or other information submitted
under paragraph
(a) of this section must be completed either in the English or
Spanish language. If the certification or other information is
completed in Spanish, the importer must also provide to the port
director, upon request, a written English translation of the
certification or other information.
(e) * * *
(2) Multiple importations of identical goods into the United States
that occur within a specified blanket period, not exceeding 12 months.
In the case of multiple shipments of identical goods, the certification
must specify the blanket period in ``mm/dd/yyyy to mm/dd/yyyy'' format.
(f) Preference criteria. The preference criterion to be included on
the certification or other information as required in paragraph
(a)(2)(vi) of this section is as follows:
* * * * *
0
6. Section 10.412 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) and
by removing paragraph (d). The revisions to paragraphs (a) and (b)(1)
read as follows:
Sec. 10.412 Importer obligations.
(a) General. An importer who makes a declaration under Sec.
10.410(a) of this subpart is responsible for the truthfulness of the
declaration and of all the information and data contained in the
certification or other information submitted to CBP under Sec.
10.411(a) of this subpart, for submitting any supporting documents
requested by CBP, and for the truthfulness of the information contained
in those documents. CBP will allow for the direct submission by the
exporter or producer of business confidential or other sensitive
information, including cost and sourcing information.
(b) * * *
(1) Must have records that explain how the importer came to the
conclusion that the good qualifies for preferential tariff treatment.
Those records must include documents that support a claim that the
article in question qualifies for preferential tariff treatment because
it meets the applicable rules of origin set forth in General Note 26,
HTSUS, and in this subpart. Those records may include a properly
completed certification or other information as set forth in Sec.
10.411 of this subpart; and
* * * * *
Sec. 10.413 [Amended]
0
7. Section 10.413 is amended by adding the words ``of this subpart''
immediately following the reference to ``Sec. 10.411'' each place it
appears;
0
8. Section 10.414 is amended by revising the section heading, paragraph
(a) introductory text, and paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 10.414 Certification or other information not required.
(a) General. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this
section, an importer will not be required to submit a certification or
other information demonstrating that the good qualifies as originating
under Sec. 10.411(a) of this subpart for:
* * * * *
(b) Exception. If the port director determines that an importation
described in paragraph (a) of this section may reasonably be considered
to have been carried out or planned for the purpose of evading
compliance with the rules and procedures governing claims for
preference under the US-CFTA, the port director will notify the
importer in writing that for that importation the importer must submit
to CBP a valid certification or other information
[[Page 76133]]
demonstrating that the good qualifies as originating. The importer must
submit such a certification or other information within 30 calendar
days from the date of the written notice. Failure to timely submit the
certification or other information will result in denial of the claim
for preferential tariff treatment.
0
9. Section 10.415 is amended by revising the paragraph (a) introductory
text to read as follows:
Sec. 10.415 Maintenance of records.
(a) General. An importer claiming preferential tariff treatment for
a good imported into the United States must maintain, for five years
after the date of importation of the good, a certification (or a copy
thereof) or other information demonstrating that the good qualifies as
originating, and any records and documents that the importer has
relating to the origin of the good, including records and documents
associated with:
* * * * *
0
10. Section 10.416 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and by adding
the words ``of this subpart'' immediately following the reference to
``Sec. 10.463'' in paragraph (b). Revised paragraph (a) reads as
follows:
Sec. 10.416 Effect of noncompliance; failure to provide documentation
regarding transshipment.
(a) Effect of noncompliance. If the importer fails to comply with
any requirement under this subpart, including submission of a
certification of origin or other information demonstrating that the
good qualifies as originating under Sec. 10.411(a) of this subpart or
submission of a corrected certification under Sec. 10.413 of this
subpart, the port director may deny preferential tariff treatment to
the imported good.
* * * * *
Sec. 10.420 [Amended]
0
11. Section 10.420 is amended by adding the words ``of this subpart''
immediately following each of the references in the section to ``Sec.
10.421,'' ``Sec. 10.451,'' ``Sec. 10.421(a) or (b),'' and ``Sec.
10.421(c)'';
Sec. 10.421 [Amended]
0
12. Section Sec. 10.421 is amended by adding the words ``of this
subpart'' immediately following the reference to ``Sec. 10.420'' in
the introductory text and by removing the term ``HTS'' each place it
appears in the section (and footnote) and adding, in its place, the
term ``HTSUS'';
0
13. Section 10.422 is amended by adding the words ``of this subpart''
immediately following the reference to ``Sec. 10.421'' in the
paragraph (a) introductory text, by re-designating current paragraphs
(a)(2)(ii) through (a)(2)(vii) as paragraphs (a)(2)(iii) through
(a)(2)(viii), respectively, by adding a new paragraph (a)(2)(ii), and
by revising paragraph (d)(2). New paragraph (a)(2)(ii) and revised
paragraph (d)(2) read as follows:
Sec. 10.422 Submission of certificate of eligibility.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) The legal name and address of the responsible official or
authorized agent of the importer signing the certificate (if different
from the importer of record), and that person's telephone and e-mail
address, if available;
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Multiple importations of identical goods into the United States
that occur within a specified blanket period, not exceeding 12 months,
set out in the certificate.
Sec. 10.424 [Amended]
0
14. Section 10.424 is amended by adding the words ``of this subpart''
immediately following the reference to ``Sec. 10.422'' in paragraph
(a) and immediately following the reference to ``Sec. 10.425'' in
paragraph (b);
Sec. 10.440 [Amended]
0
15. Section 10.440 is amended by removing the word ``part'' each place
it appears and adding, in its place, the word ``subpart'';
0
16. Section 10.441 is amended by removing the word ``part'' in
paragraph (a) and adding, in its place, the word ``subpart'', and by
revising paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 10.441 Filing procedures.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) Subject to Sec. 10.413 of this subpart, a copy of a
certification of origin or other information demonstrating that the
good qualifies for preferential tariff treatment;
* * * * *
(4) A written statement indicating whether or not any person has
filed a protest relating to the good under any provision of law; and if
any such protest has been filed, the statement must identify the
protest by number and date.
0
17. Section 10.442 is amended by removing the word ``part'' each place
it appears in paragraphs (a) and (d)(1) and adding, in its place, the
word ``subpart'', and by revising the heading and text of paragraph
(b), the second sentence of paragraph (c)(2), paragraph (d)(2), and the
second and third sentences of paragraph (d)(3). The revisions to
paragraphs (b), (c)(2), (d)(2) and (d)(3) read as follows:
Sec. 10.442 CBP processing procedures.
* * * * *
(b) Pending protest or judicial review. If the port director
determines that any protest relating to the good has not been finally
decided, the port director will suspend action on the claim for refund
filed under this subpart until the decision on the protest becomes
final. If a summons involving the tariff classification or dutiability
of the good is filed in the Court of International Trade, the port
director will suspend action on the claim for refund filed under this
subpart until judicial review has been completed.
(c) * * *
(2) * * * If the entry is otherwise to be reliquidated based on
administrative review of a protest or as a result of judicial review,
the port director will reliquidate the entry taking into account the
claim for refund under this subpart.
(d) * * *
(2) Unliquidated entry. If the port director determines that a
claim for a refund filed under this subpart should be denied and the
entry covering the good has not been liquidated, the port director will
deny the claim in connection with the liquidation of the entry, and
notice of the denial and the reason for the denial will be provided to
the importer in writing or via an authorized electronic data
interchange system.
(3) * * * If the entry is otherwise to be reliquidated based on
administrative review of a protest or as a result of judicial review,
such reliquidation may include denial of the claim filed under this
subpart. In either case, the port director will give the importer
notice of the denial and the reason for the denial in writing or via an
authorized electronic data interchange system.
Sec. 10.450 [Amended]
0
18. Section 10.450 is amended by adding the words ``of this subpart''
immediately following the reference to ``Sec. Sec. 10.450 through
10.463'' in the introductory text.
0
19. Section 10.455 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1), the heading
to paragraph (b), and paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (b)(2)(i), and (c) to read
as follows:
Sec. 10.455 Value of materials.
(a) * * *
[[Page 76134]]
(1) In the case of a material imported by the producer of the good,
the adjusted value of the material with respect to that importation;
* * * * *
(b) Permissible additions to, and deductions from, the value of
materials.
* * * * *
(1) * * *
(i) The costs of freight, insurance, packing and all other costs
incurred in transporting the material to the location of the producer;
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The costs of freight, insurance, packing and all other costs
incurred in transporting the material to the location of the producer;
(c) Accounting method. Any cost or value referenced in General Note
26(n), HTSUS, and this subpart, must be recorded and maintained in
accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles applicable
in the territory of the Party in which the good is produced (whether
Chile or the United States).
Sec. 10.457 [Amended]
0
20. In Sec. 10.457, paragraph (a)(4) is amended by removing the word
``country'' each place it appears and adding, in its place, the word
``Party''.
Sec. 10.458 [Amended]
0
21. In Sec. 10.458, paragraph (a) is amended by removing the word
``country'' each it appears and adding, in its place, the word
``Party''.
Sec. 10.460 [Amended]
0
22. Section 10.460 is amended by removing the term ``Sec. 10.402(n)''
and adding, in its place, the term ``Sec. 10.402(o)''.
Sec. 10.461 [Amended]
0
23. Section 10.461 is amended by adding in Example 1 the words ``of
this subpart'' at the end of the parenthetical phrase ``see Sec.
10.454(a)'' in the third sentence.
0
24. In Sec. 10.470, paragraph (a) is amended by revising the heading
and the first two sentences of the introductory text, to read as
follows:
Sec. 10.470 Verification and justification of claim for preferential
tariff treatment.
(a) Verification. A claim for preferential tariff treatment made
under Sec. 10.410 of this subpart, including any statements or other
information submitted to CBP in support of the claim, will be subject
to such verification as the port director deems necessary. In the event
that the port director is provided with insufficient information to
verify or substantiate the claim, the port director may deny the claim
for preferential tariff treatment. * * *
* * * * *
0
25. Section 10.473 is amended by revising the introductory text and
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 10.473 Issuance of negative origin determinations.
If CBP determines, as a result of an origin verification initiated
under this subpart, that the good which is the subject of the
verification does not qualify as an originating good, it will issue a
determination in writing or via an authorized electronic data
interchange system to the importer that sets forth the following:
* * * * *
(c) With specific reference to the rules applicable to originating
goods as set forth in General Note 26, HTSUS, and in Sec. Sec. 10.450
through 10.463 of this subpart, the legal basis for the determination;
and
* * * * *
Sec. 10.474 [Amended]
0
26. Section 10.474 is amended by removing the words ``CBP finds'' and
adding, in their place, the words ``verification or other information
reveals'';
0
27. In Sec. 10.483, paragraph (a)(2) is amended by removing the word
``part'' and adding, in its place, the word ``chapter,'' and paragraph
(c) introductory text is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 10.483 Framework for correcting declarations and certifications.
* * * * *
(c) Statement. For purposes of this subpart, each corrected
declaration or notification of an incorrect certification must be
accompanied by a statement, submitted in writing or via an authorized
electronic data interchange system, which:
* * * * *
PART 191--DRAWBACK
0
28. The general authority citation for part 191 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i),
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1313, 1624.
* * * * *
Sec. 191.0 [Amended]
0
29. Section 191.0 is amended by removing the last sentence.
Deborah J. Spero,
Acting Commissioner, Customs and Border Protection.
Approved: December 15, 2006.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 06-9780 Filed 12-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P