Notice of Environmental Assessment Related to the Issuance of a License Amendment to Byproduct Material License No. 21-01443-06, for Unrestricted Release of a Former Facility for Warner-Lambert, LC., Ann Arbor, MI, 75772-75774 [E6-21463]

Download as PDF 75772 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices permitting electronic submission of responses. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Justice Programs Overview of This Information [1121–NEW] Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comments Requested 60-Day notice of information collection under review: Reinstatement with change of a previously approved collection; 2007 survey of public defenders offices. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES ACTION: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies. Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for ‘‘sixty days’’ until February 16, 2007. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have additional comments, especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact: Lynn Langton, (202) 353–3328, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice, 810 Seventh Street, NW., Washington, DC 20531 or Lynn.Langton@usdoj.gov. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:16 Dec 15, 2006 Jkt 211001 (1) Type of Information Collection: Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired. 2007 Survey of Public Defenders Offices. (2) The Title of the Form/Collection: 2007 Survey of Public Defenders Offices. (3) The Agency Form Number, if any, and the Applicable Component of the Department Sponsoring the Collection: Previous OMB number was 1121–0095. The agency form numbers are 06–SPDO Form–A and 06–SPDO Form–B. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, United States Department of Justice. (4) Affected Public Who Will be Asked or Required to Respond, as well as a Brief Abstract: Primary: All State- and locally-funded attorneys serving as the head public defender for a county, city, or judicial district. Other: None. This nationwide information collection will identify the number and characteristics of state- and county-funded public defender offices. Information will be gathered on type of offenses represented, expenditures, caseloads, training requirements, funding sources, reliance on outside legal services, and other related administrative issues. The information collected will provide a comprehensive portrait of state and local efforts to meet the needs of indigent criminal defendants through designated public defender offices. (5) An Estimate of the Total Number of Respondents and the Amount of Time Estimated for an Average Respondent to Respond: An estimated 1,400 public defender offices will complete a 1-hour questionnaire (06–SPDO Form–A). (6) An Estimate of the Total Public Burden (in hours) Associated with the collection: The estimated public burden associated with this collection is 1,400 hours. (1,400 data collection forms completed by each public defender office * one hour per form = 1,400 burden hours). If additional information is required contact: Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Dated: December 12, 2006. Lynn Bryant, Department Clearance Officer, Department of Justice. [FR Doc. E6–21483 Filed 12–15–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410–18–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 030–04794] Notice of Environmental Assessment Related to the Issuance of a License Amendment to Byproduct Material License No. 21–01443–06, for Unrestricted Release of a Former Facility for Warner-Lambert, LC., Ann Arbor, MI Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact for License Amendment. AGENCY: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Snell, Senior Health Physicist, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2443 Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois 60532; telephone: (630) 829–9871; fax number: (630) 515–1259; or by e-mail at wgs@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is considering the issuance of an amendment to NRC Byproduct Materials License No. 21–01443–06, which is held by Warner-Lambert, LLC (licensee), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc. The amendment would authorize the decommissioning and unrestricted release of the licensee’s former Traverwood facility located at 2900 Huron Parkway, Ann Arbor, Michigan (the facility). The NRC has prepared an Environmental Assessment in support of this action in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 51. Based on the Environmental Assessment, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant Impact is appropriate. The amendment to Warner-Lambert’s license will be issued following the publication of this Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact. I. Environmental Assessment Identification of Proposed Action The proposed action would approve Warner-Lambert’s request to amend its license and release the licensee’s facility for unrestricted use in accordance with 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E. The E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM 18DEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices proposed action is in accordance with the licensee’s request to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to amend its license by letter dated August 31, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML062440517). Warner-Lambert was first licensed to use byproduct materials at its Traverwood facility on June 27, 2000. The licensee is authorized to use byproduct materials for activities involving in-vitro biochemical research. Hydrogen-3 and carbon-14 were the only two isotopes with a half-life greater than 120 days that were used at the facility in an unsealed form, and these were limited to less than 25 millicuries at any one time in the entire building. On May 17, 2006, Warner-Lambert completed removal of licensed radioactive material from the Traverwood facility. The licensee conducted surveys of the facility as part of its decommissioning activities and provided this information to the NRC to demonstrate that the radiological condition there is consistent with radiological criteria for unrestricted use in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E. No radiological remediation activities are required to complete the proposed action. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES Need for the Proposed Action The licensee is requesting this license amendment because it has moved out of the Traverwood facility, and is conducting licensed activities at another location. The NRC is fulfilling its responsibilities under the Atomic Energy Act to make a decision on the proposed action for decommissioning that ensures that residual radioactivity is reduced to a level that is protective of the public health and safety and the environment, and allows the facility to be released for unrestricted use. Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC staff reviewed the information provided and surveys performed by the licensee to demonstrate that the release of the Traverwood facility is consistent with the radiological criteria for unrestricted use specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Based on its review, the staff determined that there were no radiological impacts associated with the proposed action because no radiological remediation activities were required to complete the proposed action, and that the radiological criteria for unrestricted use in § 20.1402 have been met. Based on its review, the staff determined that the radiological environmental impacts from the proposed action for the Traverwood facility are bounded by the ‘‘Generic VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:16 Dec 15, 2006 Jkt 211001 Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRCLicensed Nuclear Facilities’’ (NUREG– 1496). Additionally, no non-radiological or cumulative impacts were identified. Therefore, the NRC has determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Alternatives to the Proposed Action The only alternative to the proposed action is to take no action. Under the no-action alternative, the licensee’s facility would remain under an NRC license and would not be released for unrestricted use. Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change to current conditions at the Traverwood facility. The no-action alternative is not acceptable because it is inconsistent with 10 CFR 30.36, which requires that decommissioning of by-product material facilities be completed and approved by the NRC after licensed activities cease. This alternative would impose an unnecessary regulatory burden in controlling access to the former Traverwood facility, and limit potential benefits from the future use of the facility. Conclusion The NRC staff concluded that the proposed action is consistent with the NRC’s unrestricted release criteria specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Because the proposed action will not significantly impact the quality of the human environment, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed action is the preferred alternative. Agencies and Persons Consulted The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action will not affect listed species or critical habitats. Therefore, no further consultation is required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Likewise, the NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is not a type of activity that has potential to cause effect on historic properties. Therefore, consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act is not required. The NRC consulted with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The Michigan DEQ, Waste and Hazardous Materials Division, Radiological Protection and Medical Waste Section was provided the draft EA for comment on November 9, 2006. Mr. Bob Skowronek, Chief, Radioactive Material and Medical Waste Unit, with the Michigan DEQ, responded to the NRC by e-mail on November 13, 2006, PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 75773 indicating that the State had no comments regarding the NRC Environmental Assessment for the release of the Warner-Lambert, Traverwood facility . II. Finding of No Significant Impact On the basis of the EA in support of the proposed license amendment to release the facility for unrestricted use, the NRC has determined that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Thus, the NRC has not prepared an environmental impact statement for the proposed action. III. Further Information Documents related to this action, including the application for amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/ reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, you can access the NRC’s Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC’s public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS, or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. The documents and ADAMS accession numbers related to this notice are: 1. Carol Lentz, Pfizer, Inc., letter to Patricia Pelke, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August 31, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML062440517). 2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ‘‘Environmental Review Guidance for Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS Programs,’’ NUREG–1748, August 2003. 3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ‘‘Generic Environmental Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities,’’ NUREG–1496, August 1994. 4. NRC, NUREG–1757, ‘‘Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,’’ Volumes 1–3, September 2003. Documents may also be viewed electronically on the public computers located at the NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction contractor will copy documents for a fee. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM 18DEN1 75774 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 242 / Monday, December 18, 2006 / Notices Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 5th day of December 2006. George M. McCann, Acting Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region III. [FR Doc. E6–21463 Filed 12–15–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Notice of Opportunity To Comment on Model Safety Evaluation and Model License Amendment Request on Technical Specification Improvement Regarding Adding an Action Statement for Two Inoperable Control Room Air Conditioning Subsystems Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Request for comment. jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has prepared a model license amendment request (LAR), model safety evaluation (SE), and model proposed no significant hazards consideration (NSHC) determination related to changes to Standard Technical Specification (STS) 3.7.5 (STS 3.7.4 for BWR/6), ‘‘Control Room Air Conditioning (AC) System’’ for NUREG–1433 and NUREG–1434. The proposed changes would also revise the Bases for STS 3.7.5 (STS 3.7.4 for BWR/ 6). The General Electric Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group (BWROG) participants in the Technical Specifications Task Force (TSTF) proposed these changes to the STS in TSTF–477, Revision 3, ‘‘Add an Action for Two Inoperable Control Room AC Subsystems.’’ The purpose of these models is to permit the NRC to efficiently process amendments to incorporate changes into plant-specific Technical Specifications (TS) for General Electric Boiling Water Reactors (BWR). Licensees of nuclear power reactors to which the models apply can request amendments conforming to the models. In such a request, a licensee should confirm the applicability of the model LAR, model SE and NSHC determination to its plant. The NRC staff is requesting comments on the model LAR, model SE and NSHC determination before announcing their availability for referencing in license amendment applications. DATES: The comment period expires 30 days from the date of this publication. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission is able to ensure VerDate Aug<31>2005 16:16 Dec 15, 2006 Jkt 211001 consideration only for comments received on or before this date. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted either electronically or via U.S. mail. Submit written comments to: Chief, Rules and Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: T–6 D59, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001. Hand deliver comments to: 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, between 7:45 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays. Submit comments by electronic mail to: CLIIP@nrc.gov. Copies of comments received may be examined at the NRC’s Public Document Room, One White Flint North, Public File Area O1–F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter C. Hearn, Mail Stop: O–12H2, Division of Inspection and Regional Support, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, telephone (301) 415–1189. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: model SE will be finalized, and posted on the NRC Web page. Each amendment application made in response to the notice of availability will be processed and noticed in accordance with applicable NRC rules and procedures. This notice involves adding an action statement for two inoperable control room air conditioning subsystems. By letter dated September 8, 2006, the BWROG proposed these changes for incorporation into the STS as TSTF– 477, Revision 3. These changes are accessible electronically from the Agency-wide Documents Access and Management System’s (ADAMS) Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet (ADAMS Accession No. ML062510321) at the NRC Web site https:// frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/ leaving.cgi?from=leavingFR.html& log=linklog&to=https://www.nrc.gov/ reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC Public Document Room Reference staff by telephone at 1–800–397–4209, 301– 415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. Background Regulatory Issue Summary 2000–06, ‘‘Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process [CLIIP] for Adopting Standard Technical Specifications Changes for Power Reactors,’’ was issued on March 20, 2000. The CLIIP is intended to improve the efficiency and transparency of NRC licensing processes. This is accomplished by processing proposed changes to the STS in a manner that supports subsequent license amendment applications. The CLIIP includes an opportunity for the public to comment on proposed changes to the STS following a preliminary assessment by the NRC staff and finding that the change will likely be offered for adoption by licensees. This notice is soliciting comments on a proposed change to the STS that adds an action statement for two inoperable control room subsystems to the General Electric BWR STS Revision 3.0 of NUREG–1433 and NUREG–1434. The CLIIP directs the NRC staff to evaluate any comments received for a proposed change to the STS and to either reconsider the change or proceed with announcing the availability of the change for proposed adoption by licensees. Those licensees opting to apply for the subject change to TSs are responsible for reviewing the staff’s evaluation, referencing the applicable technical justifications, and providing any necessary plant-specific information. Following the public comment period, the model LAR and Applicability These proposed changes will revise Section 3.7.5 (Section 3.7.4 for BWR/6) for the General Electric plants. To efficiently process incoming license amendment applications, the NRC staff requests that each licensee applying for the changes addressed by TSTF–477, Revision 3, using the CLIIP submit an LAR that adheres to the following model. Any variations from the model LAR should be explained in the licensee’s submittal. Variations from the approach recommended in this notice may require additional review by the NRC staff, and may increase the time and resources needed for the review. Significant variations from the approach, or inclusion of additional changes to the license, will result in staff rejection of the submittal. Instead, licensees desiring significant variations and/or additional changes should submit a LAR that does not claim to adopt TSTF–477. PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Public Notices This notice requests comments from interested members of the public within 30 days of the date of this publication. Following the NRC staff’s evaluation of comments received as a result of this notice, the NRC staff may reconsider the proposed change or may proceed with announcing the availability of the change in a subsequent notice (perhaps with some changes to the model LAR, model SE or model NSHC determination E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM 18DEN1

Agencies

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 242 (Monday, December 18, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75772-75774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21463]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 030-04794]


Notice of Environmental Assessment Related to the Issuance of a 
License Amendment to Byproduct Material License No. 21-01443-06, for 
Unrestricted Release of a Former Facility for Warner-Lambert, LC., Ann 
Arbor, MI

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Issuance of Environmental Assessment and Finding of No 
Significant Impact for License Amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William Snell, Senior Health 
Physicist, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials 
Safety, Region III, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2443 
Warrenville Road, Lisle, Illinois 60532; telephone: (630) 829-9871; fax 
number: (630) 515-1259; or by e-mail at wgs@nrc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) 
is considering the issuance of an amendment to NRC Byproduct Materials 
License No. 21-01443-06, which is held by Warner-Lambert, LLC 
(licensee), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer, Inc. The 
amendment would authorize the decommissioning and unrestricted release 
of the licensee's former Traverwood facility located at 2900 Huron 
Parkway, Ann Arbor, Michigan (the facility). The NRC has prepared an 
Environmental Assessment in support of this action in accordance with 
the requirements of 10 CFR Part 51. Based on the Environmental 
Assessment, the NRC has determined that a Finding of No Significant 
Impact is appropriate. The amendment to Warner-Lambert's license will 
be issued following the publication of this Environmental Assessment 
and Finding of No Significant Impact.

I. Environmental Assessment

Identification of Proposed Action

    The proposed action would approve Warner-Lambert's request to amend 
its license and release the licensee's facility for unrestricted use in 
accordance with 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E. The

[[Page 75773]]

proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's request to the 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to amend its license by letter 
dated August 31, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. ML062440517). Warner-Lambert 
was first licensed to use byproduct materials at its Traverwood 
facility on June 27, 2000. The licensee is authorized to use byproduct 
materials for activities involving in-vitro biochemical research. 
Hydrogen-3 and carbon-14 were the only two isotopes with a half-life 
greater than 120 days that were used at the facility in an unsealed 
form, and these were limited to less than 25 millicuries at any one 
time in the entire building. On May 17, 2006, Warner-Lambert completed 
removal of licensed radioactive material from the Traverwood facility.
    The licensee conducted surveys of the facility as part of its 
decommissioning activities and provided this information to the NRC to 
demonstrate that the radiological condition there is consistent with 
radiological criteria for unrestricted use in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart 
E. No radiological remediation activities are required to complete the 
proposed action.

Need for the Proposed Action

    The licensee is requesting this license amendment because it has 
moved out of the Traverwood facility, and is conducting licensed 
activities at another location. The NRC is fulfilling its 
responsibilities under the Atomic Energy Act to make a decision on the 
proposed action for decommissioning that ensures that residual 
radioactivity is reduced to a level that is protective of the public 
health and safety and the environment, and allows the facility to be 
released for unrestricted use.

Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action

    The NRC staff reviewed the information provided and surveys 
performed by the licensee to demonstrate that the release of the 
Traverwood facility is consistent with the radiological criteria for 
unrestricted use specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. Based on its review, the 
staff determined that there were no radiological impacts associated 
with the proposed action because no radiological remediation activities 
were required to complete the proposed action, and that the 
radiological criteria for unrestricted use in Sec.  20.1402 have been 
met.
    Based on its review, the staff determined that the radiological 
environmental impacts from the proposed action for the Traverwood 
facility are bounded by the ``Generic Environmental Impact Statement in 
Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for License Termination 
of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities'' (NUREG-1496). Additionally, no 
non-radiological or cumulative impacts were identified. Therefore, the 
NRC has determined that the proposed action will not have a significant 
effect on the quality of the human environment.

Alternatives to the Proposed Action

    The only alternative to the proposed action is to take no action. 
Under the no-action alternative, the licensee's facility would remain 
under an NRC license and would not be released for unrestricted use. 
Denial of the license amendment request would result in no change to 
current conditions at the Traverwood facility. The no-action 
alternative is not acceptable because it is inconsistent with 10 CFR 
30.36, which requires that decommissioning of by-product material 
facilities be completed and approved by the NRC after licensed 
activities cease. This alternative would impose an unnecessary 
regulatory burden in controlling access to the former Traverwood 
facility, and limit potential benefits from the future use of the 
facility.

Conclusion

    The NRC staff concluded that the proposed action is consistent with 
the NRC's unrestricted release criteria specified in 10 CFR 20.1402. 
Because the proposed action will not significantly impact the quality 
of the human environment, the NRC staff concludes that the proposed 
action is the preferred alternative.

Agencies and Persons Consulted

    The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action will not 
affect listed species or critical habitats. Therefore, no further 
consultation is required under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. 
Likewise, the NRC staff has determined that the proposed action is not 
a type of activity that has potential to cause effect on historic 
properties. Therefore, consultation under Section 106 of the National 
Historic Preservation Act is not required.
    The NRC consulted with the Michigan Department of Environmental 
Quality (DEQ). The Michigan DEQ, Waste and Hazardous Materials 
Division, Radiological Protection and Medical Waste Section was 
provided the draft EA for comment on November 9, 2006. Mr. Bob 
Skowronek, Chief, Radioactive Material and Medical Waste Unit, with the 
Michigan DEQ, responded to the NRC by e-mail on November 13, 2006, 
indicating that the State had no comments regarding the NRC 
Environmental Assessment for the release of the Warner-Lambert, 
Traverwood facility .

II. Finding of No Significant Impact

    On the basis of the EA in support of the proposed license amendment 
to release the facility for unrestricted use, the NRC has determined 
that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
quality of the human environment. Thus, the NRC has not prepared an 
environmental impact statement for the proposed action.

III. Further Information

    Documents related to this action, including the application for 
amendment and supporting documentation, are available electronically at 
the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this site, you can access the NRC's Agencywide 
Document Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and 
image files of NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to 
ADAMS, or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in 
ADAMS, contact the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) Reference staff at 1-
800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
    The documents and ADAMS accession numbers related to this notice 
are:
    1. Carol Lentz, Pfizer, Inc., letter to Patricia Pelke, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, August 31, 2006 (ADAMS Accession No. 
ML062440517).
    2. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Environmental Review 
Guidance for Licensing Actions Associated with NMSS Programs,'' NUREG-
1748, August 2003.
    3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ``Generic Environmental 
Impact Statement in Support of Rulemaking on Radiological Criteria for 
License Termination of NRC-Licensed Nuclear Facilities,'' NUREG-1496, 
August 1994.
    4. NRC, NUREG-1757, ``Consolidated NMSS Decommissioning Guidance,'' 
Volumes 1-3, September 2003.
    Documents may also be viewed electronically on the public computers 
located at the NRC's PDR, O 1 F21, One White Flint North, 11555 
Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR reproduction contractor 
will copy documents for a fee.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission,


[[Page 75774]]


    Dated at Lisle, Illinois, this 5th day of December 2006.
George M. McCann,
Acting Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Nuclear Materials 
Safety, Region III.
[FR Doc. E6-21463 Filed 12-15-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.