Thorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project, Malheur National Forest, Grant County, OR, 75480-75481 [06-9716]
Download as PDF
75480
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 241 / Friday, December 15, 2006 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scoping Process
Purpose and Need for Action
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing the
procedural provisions of the National
Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR
1503.3 in addressing these points.
Public participation will be especially
important at several points during the
analysis, beginning with the scoping
process (40 CFR 1501.7). Initial scoping
began with the project listed in the 2006
Fall Edition of the Malheur National
Forest’s Schedule of Proposed Actions.
A Public meeting has been planned for
January 2007 to discuss the project.
Other meetings will be scheduled as
needed. Also, correspondence with
tribes, government agencies,
organizations, and individuals who
have indicated their interest will be
conducted.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
The purpose and need of the Thorn
Fire Salvage Recovery Project includes:
(1) Recovery of the economic value of a
portion of the dead and dying trees
consistent with protection of other
resource values; and (2) improving
public safety within the fire area by
removing potential hazard trees for
public safety along open forest travel
routes.
Forest Service
Proposed Action
Thorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project,
Malheur National Forest, Grant County,
OR
This action includes salvage of dead
and dying trees from approximately
7,952 acres and removal of potential
hazard trees for public safety along open
forest travel routes. Salvage harvest
methods would include ground-based
and helicopter logging systems.
Approximately 80 percent of the harvest
area would be salvaged by helicopter.
No commercial harvest or road
construction is proposed within
Appendix C Inventoried Dry Cabin,
Cedar Grove and Shake Table Roadless
Areas. Road activities associated with
salvage and restoration will be limited
to reconstruction, opening and reclosing existing roads, and maintenance.
No new roads would be built. Following
site preparation, approximately 7,952
acres would be planted with conifer
seedlings. Forest Plan amendments
would be included as needed.
Dated December 5, 2006.
Kevin R. Schulkoski,
Acting Dixie Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E6–21145 Filed 12–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to disclose
environmental effects on a proposed
action to recover the economic value of
dead and dying trees damaged in the
Shake Table Fire Complex, and remove
potential hazard trees from open forest
travel routes within the Todd, Duncan,
Fields Creek and Dry Creek
subwatersheds. Shake Table Fire
Complex, located approximately 20
miles south west of John Day, Oregon,
burned approximately 14,527 acres
across mixed ownership in August
2006, of that approximately 13,536 acres
were on National Forest System Lands
administered by the Blue Mountain
Ranger District, Malheur National
Forest. The proposed action is the
Thorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
January 16, 2007. The Draft EIS is
expected to be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and be available to the public for review
by April 2007. The Final EIS is
scheduled to be completed by June
2007.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
the Responsible Official, Gary L. ‘‘Stan’’
Benes, Forest Supervisor, Malheur
National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge
Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day Oregon
97845. Send electronic comments to:
comments-pacificnorthwestmalheur@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
Hensley, Project Manager, Malheur
National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge
Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day, Oregon,
telephone 541–575–3167, e-mail
jhensley@fs.fed.us.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:47 Dec 14, 2006
Jkt 211001
Possible Alternatives
Alternatives will include the
proposed action, no action, and
additional alternatives that respond to
issues generated during the scoping
process. The agency will give notice of
the full environmental analysis and
decisionmaking process to interested
and affected people may participate and
contribute to the final decision.
Responsible Official and Nature of
Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official is Gary L.
‘‘Stan’’ Benes, Forest Supervisor of the
Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson
Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day,
OR 97845. The Responsible Official will
decide if the proposed project will be
implemented and will document the
decision and reasons for the decision in
a Record of Decision. That decision will
be subject to Forest Service Appeal
Regulations. The responsibility for
preparing the DEIS and FEIS has been
delegated to Brooks Smith, Acting
District Ranger, Blue Mountain Ranger
District.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues identified include
the potential effect of the proposed
action on: Soils, water quality and fish
habitat, snags and down wood,
disturbance to cultural resources,
potential for noxious weed expansion,
threatened, endangered and sensitive
aquatic, terrestrial and plant species,
potential loss of economic value of trees
damaged by wildfire, and the safety and
use of the area by public and land
managers.
Comment
Public comments about this proposal
are requested to identify issues and
alternatives to the proposed action and
to focus the scope of the analysis.
Comments received in response to this
solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be considered part of the public record
on this proposed action, and will be
available for public inspection.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
those who submit anonymous
comments will not have standing to
appeal the subsequent decisions under
36 CFR parts 215 or 217. Additionally,
pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person
may request the agency to withhold a
submission from the public record by
showing how the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such
confidentiality should be aware that
under the FOIA, confidentiality may be
granted in only very limited
circumstances such as to protect trade
secrets. The Forest Service will inform
the requester of the agency’s decision
regarding the request for confidentiality,
and where the request is denied; the
agency will return the submission and
notify the requester that the comments
may be resubmitted with or without
name and address within a specified
number of days.
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 241 / Friday, December 15, 2006 / Notices
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft
environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment
period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from
the date the Environmental Protection
Agency publishes the notice of
availability in the Federal Register. The
Forest Service believes, at this early
stage, it is important to give reviewers
notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the
environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact
statements must structure their
participation in the environmental
review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the
reviewer’s position and contentions.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.
NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553 (1978). Also,
environmental objections that could be
raised at the draft environmental impact
statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final
environmental impact statement may be
waived or dismissed by the courts. City
of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016,
1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin
Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp.
1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of
these court rulings, it is very important
that those interested in this proposed
action participate by the close of the 45day comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:47 Dec 14, 2006
Jkt 211001
Dated: December 11, 2006.
Gary L. Benes,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06–9716 Filed 12–14–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
RIN 0596–AB86
National Environmental Policy Act
Documentation Needed for
Developing, Revising, or Amending
Land Management Plans; Categorical
Exclusion
Forest Service, USDA.
Final directive.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is revising
procedures for implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and Council on Environmental
Quality (CEQ) regulations. The
procedures are being revised through
issuance of a final directive that amends
Forest Service Handbook (FSH) 1909.15,
chapter 30. This chapter describes
categorical exclusions; that is, categories
of actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment, and therefore,
normally do not require further analysis
and documentation in either an
environmental assessment (EA) or an
environmental impact statement (EIS).
The amendment adds one such category
of actions to the Agency’s NEPA
procedures for final decisions on
proposals to develop, amend, or revise
land management plans.
DATES: Effective Date: This amendment
is effective December 15, 2006
ADDRESSES: The new Forest Service
categorical exclusion is set out in FSH
1909.15, chapter 30, which is available
electronically via the World Wide Web/
Internet at https://www.fs.fed.us/im/
directives. Single paper copies are
available by contacting Anthony Erba,
Forest Service, USDA, Ecosystem
Management Coordination Staff (Mail
Stop 1104), 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Washington, DC 20250–1104.
Additional information and analysis can
be found at https://www.fs.fed.us/emc/
nfma.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony Erba, USDA Forest Service,
Ecosystem Management Coordination
Staff, (202) 205–0895. Individuals who
use telecommunication devices for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75481
p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 5, 2005, the Forest Service
published the 2005 planning rule (70 FR
1023) establishing procedures for
National Forest System compliance with
the NFMA. That planning rule provided
that approval of a plan, plan
amendment, or plan revision may be
categorically excluded from National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
documentation in accordance with
Forest Service NEPA procedures. On the
same date, the Forest Service published
a proposed amendment to its NEPA
procedures to provide for such a
categorical exclusion. Specifically, the
categorical exclusion proposed on
January 5, 2005 (70 FR 1062) would
require four changes in chapter 30 of
FSH 1909.15.
1. A category would be added to
section 31.2 that would allow
development, amendment, and revision
of plan components, or portions thereof,
to be categorically excluded unless
extraordinary circumstances exist.
2. A paragraph would be added to
section 30.3 to define the extraordinary
circumstances pertinent to the new
category. It would specify that the
inclusion of a project or activity
decision in a plan component may
constitute an extraordinary
circumstance.
3. A paragraph would be added to
section 30.3 to clarify that the extensive
public participation requirements in the
land management planning regulations
at 36 CFR 219.9 are sufficient to satisfy
the scoping requirements currently
included in section 30.3.
4. A paragraph would be added to
section 32.2 to clarify that the plan
approval document required by the land
management planning regulations at 36
CFR 219.7(c) is sufficient to satisfy the
decision memo requirements of chapter
30.
In response to comments on the
proposed categorical exclusion and to
clarify meaning, three revisions were
made to the original proposal as follows.
1. The wording of the category to be
added to section 31.2 was changed to
remove the phrase ‘‘except where
extraordinary circumstances exist’’
because the phrase is not necessary. The
following wording was added to further
clarify the actions that meet this
category’s definition: ‘‘that provide
broad guidance and information for
project and activity decision-making in
a National Forest System unit.’’
Consistent with the Supreme Court
decision in Ohio Forestry Ass’n v. Sierra
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 241 (Friday, December 15, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75480-75481]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9716]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Thorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project, Malheur National Forest,
Grant County, OR
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to disclose environmental effects on a proposed action
to recover the economic value of dead and dying trees damaged in the
Shake Table Fire Complex, and remove potential hazard trees from open
forest travel routes within the Todd, Duncan, Fields Creek and Dry
Creek subwatersheds. Shake Table Fire Complex, located approximately 20
miles south west of John Day, Oregon, burned approximately 14,527 acres
across mixed ownership in August 2006, of that approximately 13,536
acres were on National Forest System Lands administered by the Blue
Mountain Ranger District, Malheur National Forest. The proposed action
is the Thorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by January 16, 2007. The Draft EIS is expected to be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and be available to the public
for review by April 2007. The Final EIS is scheduled to be completed by
June 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to the Responsible Official, Gary L.
``Stan'' Benes, Forest Supervisor, Malheur National Forest, 431
Patterson Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day Oregon 97845. Send
electronic comments to: comments-pacificnorthwest-malheur@fs.fed.us.
for further information contact: Jerry Hensley, Project Manager,
Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John
Day, Oregon, telephone 541-575-3167, e-mail jhensley@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need of the Thorn Fire Salvage Recovery Project
includes: (1) Recovery of the economic value of a portion of the dead
and dying trees consistent with protection of other resource values;
and (2) improving public safety within the fire area by removing
potential hazard trees for public safety along open forest travel
routes.
Proposed Action
This action includes salvage of dead and dying trees from
approximately 7,952 acres and removal of potential hazard trees for
public safety along open forest travel routes. Salvage harvest methods
would include ground-based and helicopter logging systems.
Approximately 80 percent of the harvest area would be salvaged by
helicopter. No commercial harvest or road construction is proposed
within Appendix C Inventoried Dry Cabin, Cedar Grove and Shake Table
Roadless Areas. Road activities associated with salvage and restoration
will be limited to reconstruction, opening and re-closing existing
roads, and maintenance. No new roads would be built. Following site
preparation, approximately 7,952 acres would be planted with conifer
seedlings. Forest Plan amendments would be included as needed.
Possible Alternatives
Alternatives will include the proposed action, no action, and
additional alternatives that respond to issues generated during the
scoping process. The agency will give notice of the full environmental
analysis and decisionmaking process to interested and affected people
may participate and contribute to the final decision.
Responsible Official and Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official is Gary L. ``Stan'' Benes, Forest
Supervisor of the Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge Road,
P.O. Box 909, John Day, OR 97845. The Responsible Official will decide
if the proposed project will be implemented and will document the
decision and reasons for the decision in a Record of Decision. That
decision will be subject to Forest Service Appeal Regulations. The
responsibility for preparing the DEIS and FEIS has been delegated to
Brooks Smith, Acting District Ranger, Blue Mountain Ranger District.
Scoping Process
Public participation will be especially important at several points
during the analysis, beginning with the scoping process (40 CFR
1501.7). Initial scoping began with the project listed in the 2006 Fall
Edition of the Malheur National Forest's Schedule of Proposed Actions.
A Public meeting has been planned for January 2007 to discuss the
project. Other meetings will be scheduled as needed. Also,
correspondence with tribes, government agencies, organizations, and
individuals who have indicated their interest will be conducted.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues identified include the potential effect of the
proposed action on: Soils, water quality and fish habitat, snags and
down wood, disturbance to cultural resources, potential for noxious
weed expansion, threatened, endangered and sensitive aquatic,
terrestrial and plant species, potential loss of economic value of
trees damaged by wildfire, and the safety and use of the area by public
and land managers.
Comment
Public comments about this proposal are requested to identify
issues and alternatives to the proposed action and to focus the scope
of the analysis. Comments received in response to this solicitation,
including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered
part of the public record on this proposed action, and will be
available for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments
will not have standing to appeal the subsequent decisions under 36 CFR
parts 215 or 217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person
may request the agency to withhold a submission from the public record
by showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such confidentiality should be
aware that under the FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very
limited circumstances such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest
Service will inform the requester of the agency's decision regarding
the request for confidentiality, and where the request is denied; the
agency will return the submission and notify the requester that the
comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address within a
specified number of days.
[[Page 75481]]
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal
Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to
public participation in the environmental review process. First,
reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: December 11, 2006.
Gary L. Benes,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-9716 Filed 12-14-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M