General Provisions; Revised List of Migratory Birds, 75188-75189 [E6-21313]
Download as PDF
75188
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
(c) For indefinite delivery contracts,
the individual order does not provide
for progress payments; and
(d) For other than an indefinite
delivery contract, the contract does not
provide for progress payments.
7. Amend section 32.1004 by—
a. Revising the 3rd sentence of
paragraph (a)(1);
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(iii);
c. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (b)(2);
d. Adding a new sentence to the end
of paragraph (b)(2)(ii);
e. Redesignating paragraphs (c), (d),
and (e) as (d), (e), and (f) respectively,
and adding a new paragraph (c);
f. Revising the 2nd sentence of the
newly redesignated paragraph (f)(1)(ii);
and
g. Removing from the newly
redesignated paragraph (f)(2)(ii)
‘‘(e)(1)(ii)’’ and adding ‘‘(f)(1)(ii)’’ in its
place.
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
32.1004
Procedures.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * * (1) * * * The signing of
contracts or modifications, the exercise
of options, the passage of time, or other
such occurrences do not represent
meaningful efforts or actions and shall
not be identified as events or criteria for
performance-based payments. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(iii) The contract must specifically
identify cumulative events or criteria
and identify which events or criteria are
preconditions for the successful
achievement of each cumulative event
or criterion.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) Total performance-based payments
shall—
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) * * * Unless otherwise provided
in agency procedures, the contracting
officer shall document the rationale for
establishing the performance-based
payment rate if the performance-based
payment rate is less than the
contractor’s applicable progress
payment rate.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Payment Amount. The contracting
officer shall not limit the amount of a
performance-based payment to a
percentage of actual incurred cost for
the scheduled event or performance
criteria.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * * Unless agencies prescribe
other evaluation procedures, if the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:28 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
contracting officer anticipates that the
cost of providing performance-based
payments would have a significant
impact on determining the best value
offer, the solicitation should state that
the evaluation of the offeror’s proposed
prices will include an adjustment to
reflect the estimated cost to the
Government of providing each offeror’s
proposed performance-based payments
(see Alternate I to the provision at
52.232–28).
*
*
*
*
*
8. Amend section 32.1005 by—
a. Revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a); and
b. Removing from paragraph (b)(2)
‘‘32.1004(e)’’ and adding ‘‘32.1004(f)’’ in
its place.
The revised text reads as follows:
32.1005 Solicitation provision and
contract clause.
(a) Insert the clause at 52.232–32,
Performance-Based Payments, in—
*
*
*
*
*
9. Amend section 32.1007 by—
a. Revising paragraph (a);
b. Removing from paragraph (b)(2)
‘‘32.1004(c)’’ and adding ‘‘32.1004(d)’’
in its place; and
c. Adding to the end of paragraph (c)
a new sentence.
The revised and added text reads as
follows:
32.1007 Administration and payment of
performance-based payments.
(a) Responsibility. The contracting
officer responsible for administering
performance-based payments (see
42.302(a)(12)) for the contract shall
review and approve all performancebased payments for that contract.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * Reviews shall not include
verification of actual cost unless the
purpose is to assist in establishing
revised or new performance-based
payment milestones or values.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
10. Amend section 52.232–32 by
revising the date of the clause and the
second sentence of paragraph (c)(2) to
read as follows:
52.232–32
Performance-Based Payments.
*
*
*
*
*
PERFORMANCE-BASED PAYMENTS
(DATE)
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * * The designated payment office
will pay approved requests on the
lllllllll [Contracting Officer
insert day as prescribed by agency head; if
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
not prescribed, insert ‘‘30th’’] day after
receipt of the request for performance-based
payment by the designated payment office. *
**
*
*
*
*
*
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 06–9678 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 10
RIN 1018–AB72
General Provisions; Revised List of
Migratory Birds
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife
Service, are reopening the comment
period for our proposed rule to revise
the list of migratory birds protected by
the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA)
to allow interested persons additional
time to prepare and submit comments.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before December
29, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments on
this proposal in one of the following
ways:
1. By postal mail to Chief, Division of
Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax
Drive, Mail Stop 4107, Arlington, VA
22203;
2. By hand-delivery to U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory
Bird Management, 4501 North Fairfax
Drive, Room 4000, Arlington, VA 22203.
By prior arrangement, materials
available for public inspection can also
be examined at this location;
3. By fax to (703) 358–2272; or
4. By e-mail to mbtabirdlist@fws.gov;
or
5. By the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
L. Trapp, (703) 358–1714.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August
24, 2006, we published in the Federal
Register (71 FR 50194–50221) a
proposed rule to revise the List of
Migratory Birds by adding numerous
species and removing numerous
species. The proposed rule is available
for online viewing or downloading at
https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/.
Our reasons for proposing changes to
the list include correcting previous
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
mistakes, including misspellings;
adding species based on new evidence
of occurrence in the United States or
U.S. territories; removing species no
longer known to occur within the
United States; and changing names
based on new taxonomy. The net
increase of 140 species (152 added and
12 removed) would bring to 972 the
total number of species protected by the
MBTA (16 U.S.C. 703–711).
We regulate most aspects of the
taking, possession, transportation, sale,
purchase, barter, exportation, and
importation of migratory birds. An
accurate and up-to-date list of species
protected by the MBTA is essential for
regulatory purposes.
The comment period for the proposed
rule ended October 23, 2006. We are
reopening the comment period for an
additional 15 days (see DATES) to allow
interested persons additional time to
prepare and submit comments. We will
also consider all comments received
between October 24, 2006 (the day after
the close of the original comment
period) and the date of this notice.
Dated: December 5, 2006.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E6–21313 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018–AU83
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Designation of Critical
Habitat for the Monterey Spineflower
(Chorizanthe pungens var. pungens)
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
Proposed rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In response to a settlement
agreement, we, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
revise currently designated critical
habitat for the Monterey spineflower
(Chorizanthe pungens var. pungens)
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act
of 1973, as amended (Act). In total,
approximately 11,032 acres (ac) (4,466
hectares (ha)) fall within the boundaries
of the proposed revision to the critical
habitat designation. The proposed
revision to critical habitat is located in
Santa Cruz and Monterey Counties,
California.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:28 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
We will accept comments from
all interested parties until February 12,
2007. We must receive requests for
public hearings, in writing, at the
address shown in the ADDRESSES section
by January 29, 2007.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment,
you may submit your comments and
materials concerning this proposal by
any one of several methods:
1. You may mail or hand-deliver
written comments and information to
Diane Noda, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, Ventura Fish and
Wildlife Office (VFWO), 2493 Portola
Road, Suite B, Ventura, California
93003.
2. You may send comments by
electronic mail (e-mail) to
fw8mosp@fws.gov. Please see the Public
Comments Solicited section below for
file format and other information about
electronic filing.
3. You may fax your comments to
805/644–3958.
4. You may go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments and materials received, as
well as supporting documentation used
in the preparation of this proposed rule,
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at the VFWO 2493 Portola Road,
Suite B, Ventura, California 93003
(telephone 805/644–1766).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Diane Noda, Field Supervisor, VFWO,
2493 Portola Road, Suite B, Ventura,
California 93003, (telephone 805/644–
1766, ext. 319; facsimile 805/644–3958).
Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) may call the
Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at 800–877–8339, 7 days a week
and 24 hours a day.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Public Comments Solicited
We intend that any final action
resulting from this proposal will be as
accurate and as effective as possible.
Therefore, comments or suggestions
from the public, other concerned
governmental agencies, the scientific
community, industry, or any other
interested party concerning this
proposed rule are hereby solicited.
Comments particularly are sought
concerning:
(1) The reasons any habitat should or
should not be determined to be critical
habitat as provided by section 4 of the
Act, including whether the benefit of
designation will outweigh any threats to
the species due to designation;
(2) Specific information on the
amount and distribution of Chorizanthe
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75189
pungens var. pungens habitat, and what
areas should be included in the
designations that were occupied at the
time of listing that contain the features
that are essential for the conservation of
the species and why, and what areas
that were not occupied at the time of
listing are essential to the conservation
of the species and why;
(3) Land use designations and current
or planned activities in the subject areas
and their possible impacts on proposed
critical habitat;
(4) Any foreseeable economic,
national security, or other potential
impacts resulting from the proposed
designation and, in particular, any
impacts on small entities;
(5) Whether our approach to
designating critical habitat could be
improved or modified in any way to
provide for greater public participation
and understanding, or to assist us in
accommodating public concerns and
comments;
(6) This proposed designation’s
revised criteria for determining essential
features and critical habitat boundaries;
and
(7) The existence of any conservation
or management plans being
implemented by California State Parks,
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) on
former Fort Ord, or other public or
private land management agencies or
owners that we should consider for
exclusion from the designation pursuant
to section 4(b)(2) of the Act. Please
include information on any benefits
(educational, regulatory, etc.) of
including or excluding lands from this
proposed revised designation.
If you wish to comment, you may
submit your comments and materials
concerning this proposal by any one of
several methods (see ADDRESSES
section). Please submit Internet
comments to fw8mosp@fws.gov in ASCII
file format and avoid the use of special
characters or any form of encryption.
Please also include ‘‘Attn: Chorizanthe
pungens var. pungens’’ in your e-mail
subject header and your name and
return address in the body of your
message. If you do not receive a
confirmation from the system that we
have received your Internet message,
contact us directly by calling our VFWO
at phone number 805/644–1766, ext.
333. Please note that the Internet
address, fw8mosp@fws.gov, will be
closed out at the termination of the
public comment period.
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their names and home
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75188-75189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-21313]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 10
RIN 1018-AB72
General Provisions; Revised List of Migratory Birds
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Fish and Wildlife Service, are reopening the comment
period for our proposed rule to revise the list of migratory birds
protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) to allow interested
persons additional time to prepare and submit comments.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
December 29, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments on this proposal in one of the
following ways:
1. By postal mail to Chief, Division of Migratory Bird Management,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mail Stop
4107, Arlington, VA 22203;
2. By hand-delivery to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of
Migratory Bird Management, 4501 North Fairfax Drive, Room 4000,
Arlington, VA 22203. By prior arrangement, materials available for
public inspection can also be examined at this location;
3. By fax to (703) 358-2272; or
4. By e-mail to mbtabirdlist@fws.gov; or
5. By the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John L. Trapp, (703) 358-1714.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 24, 2006, we published in the
Federal Register (71 FR 50194-50221) a proposed rule to revise the List
of Migratory Birds by adding numerous species and removing numerous
species. The proposed rule is available for online viewing or
downloading at https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/.
Our reasons for proposing changes to the list include correcting
previous
[[Page 75189]]
mistakes, including misspellings; adding species based on new evidence
of occurrence in the United States or U.S. territories; removing
species no longer known to occur within the United States; and changing
names based on new taxonomy. The net increase of 140 species (152 added
and 12 removed) would bring to 972 the total number of species
protected by the MBTA (16 U.S.C. 703-711).
We regulate most aspects of the taking, possession, transportation,
sale, purchase, barter, exportation, and importation of migratory
birds. An accurate and up-to-date list of species protected by the MBTA
is essential for regulatory purposes.
The comment period for the proposed rule ended October 23, 2006. We
are reopening the comment period for an additional 15 days (see DATES)
to allow interested persons additional time to prepare and submit
comments. We will also consider all comments received between October
24, 2006 (the day after the close of the original comment period) and
the date of this notice.
Dated: December 5, 2006.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E6-21313 Filed 12-13-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P