Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Gulf Red Snapper Management Measures, 75220-75226 [06-9676]
Download as PDF
75220
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
known, and the specific impacts of
climate change on Sclerocactus
brevispinus are not known. Small
population size and fragmentation, in
combination with other natural factors
such as limitations of the cacti’s
pollinator’s range, may be impacting
reproductive success. While the petition
raises some interesting issues with
respect to this factor, there is
insufficient information to conclude
that listing may be warranted based on
this factor alone.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Finding
We have reviewed the petition and
literature cited in the petition and
evaluated that information in relation to
other pertinent literature and
information available in our files. After
this review and evaluation, we find that
the petition presents substantial
information indicating that listing
Sclerocactus brevispinus may be
warranted. The petition provides
substantial information supporting the
present and threatened destruction of
the species’ habitat from direct and
indirect effects associated with energy
development across more than 90
percent of the species’ range. Illegal and
unauthorized overcollection of the
species for horticultural purposes also
was identified in the petition and is
verified by information in our files. As
such, we are initiating a further status
review of S. brevispinus to determine
whether listing the species under the
Act may be warranted.
We also have reviewed the available
information to determine if the existing
and foreseeable threats pose an
emergency to this species. We have
determined that an emergency listing is
not warranted at this time because the
species receives current protection
under the Act by its inclusion within
the currently listed Sclerocactus glaucus
complex.
The petitioners also request that we
designate critical habitat for this
species. We always consider the need
for critical habitat designation when
listing species. If we determine in our
12-month finding that listing
Sclerocactus brevispinus is warranted,
we will address the designation of
critical habitat at the time of the
proposed rulemaking.
Public Comments Solicited
Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act requires
that we make a 12-month finding as to
whether a petitioned action is (a) not
warranted, (b) warranted, or (c)
warranted but precluded by other
pending proposals to determine whether
other species are threatened or
endangered, and we are making
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:28 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
expeditious progress to list or delist
qualified species. The 12-month finding
is based on a status review that is
initiated by a positive 90-day finding.
At this time, we are opening a 60-day
comment period (see DATES) to allow
all interested parties an opportunity to
provide information on the status of S.
brevispinus and on the 5-year review for
the entire Sclerocactus glaucus complex
(including S. glaucus, S. wetlandicus,
and S. brevispinus), including potential
threats to these cacti. We will base our
12-month finding, and our 5-year review
(as discussed previously), on a review of
the best scientific and commercial
information available, including the
studies cited in this notice and all such
information received during the public
comment period. Information regarding
the following topics would be
particularly useful: (1) Species biology,
including but not limited to population
trends, distribution, abundance,
demographics, genetics, and taxonomy,
including any evaluations or reviews of
the studies cited in this notice; (2)
habitat conditions, including but not
limited to amount, distribution, and
suitability; (3) conservation measures
that have been implemented that benefit
the species; (4) threat status and trends;
and (5) other new information or data.
When our 12-month status review,
and 5-year review, processes have been
completed, our practice is to make
comments, including names and home
addresses of respondents, available for
public review during regular business
hours. Individual respondents may
request that we withhold their names,
home addresses, or other personal
information, but if you wish us to
consider withholding this information,
you must state this prominently at the
beginning of your comments. In
addition, you must present a rationale
for withholding this information. This
rationale must demonstrate that
disclosure would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of privacy.
Unsupported assertions will not meet
this burden. In the absence of
exceptional, documentable
circumstances, this information will be
released. We will always make
submissions from organizations or
businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Please submit electronic comments in
an ASCII or Microsoft Word file and
avoid the use of any special characters
or any form of encryption. Also, please
include ‘‘Attn: Uinta Basin Hookless
Cactus’’ or ‘‘Attn: Pariette Cactus’’ along
with your name and return address in
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
your e-mail message. If you do not
receive a confirmation from the system
that we have received your e-mail
message, please submit your comments
in writing using one of the alternate
methods provided in the ADDRESSES
section.
References Cited
A complete list of all references cited
herein is available, upon request, from
the Utah Fish and Wildlife Service
Office (see ADDRESSES).
Author
The primary author of this document
is Larry England, Botanist, Utah
Ecological Services Office, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (see ADDRESSES).
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Dated: December 7, 2006.
Kenneth Stansell,
Acting Director, Fish and Wildlife Service
[FR Doc. E6–21259 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 061121304–6304–01; I.D.
112006B]
RIN 0648–AT87
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Gulf Red
Snapper Management Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed temporary rule;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
implement interim measures to reduce
overfishing of Gulf red snapper. This
proposed rule would reduce the
commercial and recreational quotas for
red snapper, reduce the commercial
minimum size limit for red snapper,
reduce the recreational bag limit for
Gulf red snapper, prohibit the retention
of red snapper under the bag limit for
captain and crew of a vessel operating
as a charter vessel or headboat, and
establish a target level of reduction of
shrimp trawl bycatch mortality of red
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Background
The first rebuilding plan established
in 1990 has been revised several times,
including extension of the target date for
rebuilding the stock, in response to new
data and assessments which have
provided a better understanding of stock
biomass and influencing factors,
including shrimp trawl bycatch
mortality. The current rebuilding plan,
implemented in 2005, is designed to
end overfishing in 2009/2010 and
rebuild the stock by 2032 to the biomass
level needed to allow harvest at
maximum sustainable yield on a
continuing basis. The most recent stock
assessment (2005) indicates red snapper
catch and discard mortality in the
directed red snapper fishery and
bycatch mortality rates in the shrimp
fishery are jeopardizing the success of
the current rebuilding plan. In the
western Gulf, the shrimp trawl fishery
represents the greatest source of red
snapper fishing mortality, followed by
the commercial red snapper directed
fishery, whereas the directed red
snapper recreational fishery represents
the greatest source of fishing mortality
in the eastern Gulf. The eastern Gulf and
western Gulf are separated by the
Mississippi River delta.
At the August 2006 Council meeting,
the Council voted to delay consideration
of regulatory actions needed to address
red snapper overfishing until more
recent data and information become
available for the directed red snapper
and shrimp trawl fisheries. However,
postponing development of a plan
amendment would further delay
progress in stock recovery because
measures to address overfishing would
not occur during the 2007 fishing
season.
To address overfishing of the red
snapper stock for 2007, NMFS is
proposing this rule that would reduce
fishing mortality in 2007 and allow
progress towards rebuilding this stock
until more permanent measures could
be established to end overfishing. This
proposed rule would also address
overfishing by establishing a red
snapper bycatch reduction goal for the
shrimp fishery.
The Gulf of Mexico red snapper stock
is overfished and undergoing
overfishing. Multiple fisheries influence
the status of this stock, including the
commercial and recreational red
snapper fisheries, and the shrimp trawl
fishery which takes red snapper
incidentally when harvesting shrimp.
The competing interests and goals of
these multiple fisheries challenge
fishery managers to balance multiple
tradeoffs in rebuilding the red snapper
stock.
Provisions of This Proposed Rule
This proposed rule would reduce
fishing mortality on red snapper in 2007
by reducing harvest and bycatch levels.
Specifically, this proposed rule would:
(1) reduce the red snapper total
allowable catch (TAC) from 9.12 million
lb (4.14 million kg) to 6.5 million lb (2.9
million kg), whole weight, resulting in
a commercial quota of 3.315 million lb
(1.504 million kg) and a recreational
quota of 3.185 million lb (1.445 million
kg); (2) reduce the daily red snapper
snapper. The public comment period on
the proposed rule will end on January
26, 2007, to provide the Gulf of Mexico
Fishery Management Council and the
public the opportunity to discuss and
comment on the rule at the January
Council meeting. The intended effect is
to reduce overfishing of red snapper in
the Gulf of Mexico.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before January 26, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
• E-mail: 0648–
AT87.Proposed@noaa.gov. Include in
the subject line the following document
identifier: 0648–AT87.
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Peter Hood, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
• Fax: 727–824–5308; Attention:
Peter Hood.
Copies of documents supporting this
proposed rule, which includes a draft
environmental impact statement (DEIS),
and an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA), may be obtained from
Peter Hood, Southeast Regional Office,
NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St.
Petersburg, FL 33701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Hood, telephone: 727–551–5784,
fax: 727–824–5308, e-mail:
peter.hood@noaa.gov.
The red
snapper fishery of the Gulf of Mexico is
managed under the Fishery
Management Plan (FMP) for the Reef
Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and
the shrimp fishery is managed under the
FMP for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf
of Mexico. The FMPs were prepared by
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council (Council) and are implemented
under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act) by regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:28 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75221
recreational bag limit from four to two
fish per person; establish a 0–fish red
snapper bag limit for the captain and
crew of a vessel operating as a charter
vessel or headboat; (3) reduce the
commercial minimum size limit from 15
inches (38 cm) to 13 inches (33 cm),
total length; and (4) establish a target
reduction goal for shrimp trawl bycatch
mortality on red snapper that is 50
percent less than shrimp trawl bycatch
mortality during the 2001–2003
benchmark years used in the 2005 stock
assessment.
Measures to Reduce Directed Fishing
Mortality
In developing this proposed rule,
NMFS evaluated measures for TAC and
the recreational fishery based on a
qualitative assumption that some level
of reduction in landings has occurred
due to the direct effects of hurricanes
and increased fuel costs during 2004
and 2005. Sufficient data are not
available at this time to quantify fully
the precise level of reduction, although
preliminary recreational data suggests a
decrease in landings has occurred in
2006.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires
that NMFS manage the red snapper
fishery to ensure harvest is constrained
to the available quotas. For the
commercial fishery, the 3.315 million-lb
(1.504 million-kg) quota will be
managed through an individual fishing
quota (IFQ) program beginning in 2007.
For the recreational fishery, NMFS
previously has employed bag limits, size
limits, and seasonal closures in an effort
to constrain harvest to the available
quota while minimizing, to the extent
practicable, the short-term adverse
economic and social impacts.
Reduction of TAC
This proposed rule would reduce the
red snapper TAC for 2007 to 6.5 million
lb (2.9 million kg), which is 0.5 million
lb (0.23 million kg) less than the
maximum allowable biological catch
(ABC). Based on the 2005 stock
assessment, TACs greater than 5 million
lb (2.3 million kg) would not be
expected to end overfishing
immediately. TACs set at 5 million lb
(2.3 million kg) or less during 2007
would end overfishing immediately, but
only if all sources of fishing mortality
(directed harvest, shrimp trawl bycatch,
and closed season discards) could be
reduced to the fishing mortality rate
associated with harvesting the stock at
the maximum sustainable yield. TACs
greater than 5 million lb (2.3 million kg)
but less than 7 million lb (3.2 million
kg) would reduce fishing mortality and
continue to allow rebuilding progress in
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
75222
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
2007 consistent with the current
rebuilding plan which ends overfishing
in 2009. The Council would need to
recommend more permanent TACs
within or below this range after 2007 to
be consistent with the current
rebuilding plan over the long-term. The
higher the TAC is set in 2007, the lower
the TAC will need to be set in the future
to end overfishing by 2009 to maintain
adequate progress under the current
rebuilding plan.
Bag Limit Reductions
Assuming some level of reduction in
recreational landings has occurred due
to hurricanes and increased fuel prices,
based on preliminary data, the
combined effect of reducing the daily
recreational bag limit from 4 to 2 fish
per person and reducing the captain and
crew bag limit for vessels operating as
charter vessels or headboats to zero
should control harvest sufficiently to
ensure the recreational fishery remains
within its 3.185 million-lb (1.445
million-kg) recreational quota while
maintaining the current recreational
fishing season. Reducing the bag limit is
estimated to achieve at least a 17–
percent reduction in harvest, and,
therefore, would benefit red snapper
stock recovery. Reducing the captain
and crew bag limit to zero is estimated
to reduce red snapper landings by
approximately 2 percent. The reduction
from these two measures, combined
with the reduction in landings
attributed to the effects of hurricanes
and increased fuel prices, would allow
the recreational fishery to maintain its
current 194–day recreational fishing
season (April 21 October 31) for 2007.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Measures to Reduce Bycatch Mortality
For the red snapper stock to recover
in a manner consistent with the current
rebuilding plan, bycatch mortality must
be minimized. This proposed rule
addresses two sources of bycatch
mortality -discard mortality in the
directed commercial fishery and
bycatch mortality in the shrimp fishery.
Reduction in the Commercial Minimum
Size Limit
To reduce the number of red snapper
discarded dead in the directed
commercial red snapper fishery, this
proposed rule would reduce the
commercial minimum size limit from 15
to 13 inches (38 to 33 cm), total length.
Red snapper discard mortality rates in
the directed commercial fishery are very
high--estimated to range between 71 and
82 percent. By reducing the commercial
minimum size limit, fish between 13
and 15 inches (33 and 38 cm) would be
retained and counted toward the quota
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:28 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
rather than discarded, mostly dead, as
bycatch. It is estimated that reducing the
commercial minimum size limit by 2
inches (5 cm) would reduce the
commercial red snapper fishery’s dead
discards by 40 to 60 percent.
NMFS carefully considered reducing
the recreational minimum size limit but
is not proposing to do so in this
rulemaking because there is currently
no scientific information to indicate a
reduction in the recreational minimum
size limit would reduce overfishing.
This rule is being promulgated
consistent with the provision of section
305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act
relating to interim measures needed to
reduce overfishing. Measures that do
not reduce overfishing would not be
consistent with the regulatory authority
provided in that provision of section
305(c).
Establishment of a Target Reduction for
Shrimp Trawl Bycatch Mortality
To facilitate reduction of red snapper
bycatch mortality in the shrimp fishery,
the proposed rule would establish a
target reduction in the shrimp trawl red
snapper bycatch mortality rate that is 50
percent less than the bycatch mortality
rate during the benchmark years, 2001–
2003, used in the 2005 red snapper
stock assessment. This target reflects the
level of shrimp trawl effort documented
in 2005 in areas where red snapper are
abundant in the western Gulf of Mexico,
compared to the level of effort during
the benchmark years. The target goal
does not meet the current rebuilding
plan target mortality reduction level
necessary to rebuild the red snapper
stock. However, preliminary
information for 2006 suggests effort in
the shrimp fishery has continued to
decline in offshore waters of the western
Gulf of Mexico. Therefore, similar to the
assumption applied to the directed red
snapper fishery, NMFS is making a
qualitative assumption effort for 2006
and 2007 will likely be less than the
level of effort documented during 2005
for areas where red snapper are
commonly taken. Additional bycatch
mortality reduction is expected from the
introduction of new bycatch reduction
devices (BRDs) for the fishery under a
pending revision to the certification
criterion for BRDs. In combination,
NMFS estimates red snapper bycatch
mortality attributable to the shrimp
fishery over the next few years may
closely approximate the needed
reductions from the benchmark years of
2001–2003, while allowing the industry
some flexibility in achieving optimum
yield, as it is currently defined for the
fishery.
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Council may recommend a
different course of action for a long-term
management strategy to control shrimp
trawl bycatch mortality of red snapper;
however, the proposed reduction target
would provide an interim means to
address shrimp trawl bycatch in 2007.
NMFS intends to provide 2006 shrimp
trawl effort information to the Council
as soon as it is available. If shrimp effort
for 2006 is above the target, the Council
may recommend further action in 2007
to maintain the proposed reductions in
shrimp effort in areas of the western
Gulf of Mexico where red snapper are
most abundant.
Future Action
NMFS believes that this proposed rule
is necessary to reduce overfishing of red
snapper in the Gulf of Mexico. NMFS
will consider all public comments
received on this proposed rule in
determining whether to proceed with a
final rule and, if so, whether any
revisions would be appropriate in the
final rule. If NMFS issues a final rule,
it would be effective for not more than
180 days, as authorized by section
305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The final rule could be extended for an
additional 180 days, provided that the
public has had an opportunity to
comment on the rule.
NMFS acknowledges the need to
continue monitoring all sources of red
snapper mortality to determine the
appropriate level of future actions
necessary to ensure progress consistent
with the stock rebuilding plan over the
long term.
Classification
At this time, NMFS has not
determined whether the interim
measures which this proposed rule
would implement, are consistent with
the national standards of the MagnusonStevens Act and other applicable laws.
NMFS, in making that determination,
will take into account the data, views,
and comments received during the
comment period on this proposed rule.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared a draft environmental
impact statement (DEIS) for this action;
a notice of availability was published on
October 13, 2006 (71 FR 60509).
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required
by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, for this proposed rule.
The IRFA describes the economic
impact this proposed rule, if adopted,
would have on small entities. A
description of the action, why it is being
considered, and the objectives of, and
legal basis for this action are contained
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
at the beginning of this section in the
preamble and in the SUMMARY section of
the preamble. A copy of the full analysis
is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA
follows.
This proposed rule would reduce
TAC in the red snapper fishery, lower
the recreational red snapper bag limit to
2 fish, lower the red snapper bag limit
for captain and crew of a vessel
operating as a charter vessel or headboat
to 0 fish, reduce the red snapper
minimum size limit in the commercial
fishery to 13 inches (33 cm), and
establish a reduction goal for red
snapper bycatch mortality in the
commercial shrimp fishery. The
purpose for this action is to address
overfishing of the red snapper stock on
a temporary basis while the Council
develops a comprehensive plan to
reduce directed and incidental red
snapper fishing mortality rates in the
red snapper and shrimp fisheries. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the
statutory basis for the proposed rule.
No duplicative, overlapping, or
conflicting Federal rules have been
identified.
This proposed action would be
expected to impact red snapper
commercial fishers and for-hire
operators, and reef fish dealers and
processors participating in the red
snapper trade. The proposed action and
certain proposed alternatives would also
apply to the commercial shrimp fishery.
However, these shrimp-related
alternatives would either maintain the
status quo, or otherwise accommodate
current conditions, such that no direct
impacts are expected to accrue at this
time. Nevertheless, a description of the
entities in the shrimp fishery is
included in the following discussion.
The Small Business Administration
(SBA) has established size criteria for all
major industry sectors in the U.S.
including fish harvesters, for-hire
operations, fish processors, and fish
dealers. A business involved in fish
harvesting is classified as a small
business if it is independently owned
and operated, is not dominant in its
field of operation (including its
affiliates), and has combined annual
receipts not in excess of $4.0 million
(NAICS code 114111, finfish fishing) for
all affiliated operations worldwide. For
for-hire operations, the other qualifiers
apply and the annual receipts threshold
is $6.5 million (NAICS code 713990,
recreational industries). For seafood
processor and dealers, the SBA uses an
employee threshold rather than a
receipts threshold, or 500 or fewer
persons on a full-time, part-time,
temporary, or other basis, at all affiliated
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:28 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
operations for a seafood processor and
100 or fewer persons for a seafood
dealer.
Currently, 136 entities hold Class 1
licenses that allow a commercial vessel
trip limit of up to 2,000 lb (907 kg) of
red snapper and 628 entities hold Class
2 licenses that allow a trip limit of up
to 200 lb (91 kg) of red snapper.
Between 2002 and 2004, the top 50 red
snapper vessels harvested a total of 2.77
million lbs (1.26 million kg) of red
snapper, on average, or 64 percent of the
industry total. Vessels ranked 51 to 131
harvested 1.29 million lbs (0.58 million
kg), on average, or 30 percent of the
industry total for the same period. In
total, the top 131 vessels accounted for
approximately 94 percent of the total
red snapper commercial landings. Red
snapper are mainly harvested by vertical
line fishermen, who accounted for
approximately 90 percent of commercial
red snapper Gulf harvests, on average,
between 2002 and 2004.
Reported average annual gross
receipts (2004 dollars) of commercial
reef fish vessels in the GOM range from
$24,095 for low-volume vertical line
vessels to $116,989 for high-volume
longline vessels. Annual net incomes
range from $4,479 for low-volume
vertical line vessels to $28,466 for highvolume vertical line vessels. Some fleet
activity is known to exist in the
commercial red snapper fishery, but the
extent of such activity is unknown. The
maximum number of reef fish permits
reported owned by the same person/
entity is six permits. Additional permits
(and the revenues associated with those
permits) may be linked to an entity
through affiliation rules, but such
affiliation links cannot be made using
existing data. A definitive determination
of whether any commercial entities
would be considered large entities
cannot be made using average income
information. However, based on the size
and value of the commercial red
snapper fishery (an average of 4.336
million lb (1.967 million kg) and
$11.652 million ex-vessel revenue per
year, 2002–2004), the number of
participants in the fishery (136 Class 1
licenses and 628 Class 2 licenses), the
summary statistics provided above, and
maximum number of permits owned by
a single entity, it is determined, for the
purpose of this assessment, that all
commercial reef fish harvest entities
that would be affected by this action are
small entities.
Currently, 1,625 vessels are estimated
to be permitted to operate in the Gulf
reef fish fishery in the for-hire sector.
Fleet behavior also exists in this sector,
with at least one entity reported to hold
12 permits. The bulk of the fishery,
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75223
however, consists of single-permit
operations.
The for-hire fleet is comprised of
charterboats, which charge a fee on a
vessel basis, and headboats, which
charge a fee on an individual angler
(head) basis. The average charterboat is
estimated to generate $76,960 in annual
revenues and $36,758 in annual profits,
whereas the appropriate values for the
average headboat are $404,172 and
$338,209, respectively. The calculation
of costs does not include fixed and other
non-operating expenses, which tend to
be higher for headboats.
Based on the average revenue figures,
it is determined, for the purpose of this
assessment, that all for-hire operations
that would be affected by this action are
small entities.
The measures in this action would
also be expected to affect fish dealers,
particularly those that receive red
snapper from harvesting vessels. Two
hundred and twenty-seven dealers
currently have the required Federal
permit to buy and sell commercial reef
fish species. All processors would be
included in this total since all
processors must be dealers. From 1997–
2002, an average of 154 dealers
purchased red snapper from commercial
vessels. Average employment
information per reef fish dealer is
unknown. Although dealers and
processors are not synonymous entities,
reported total employment for reef fish
processors in the Southeast is estimated
to be approximately 700 individuals,
both part and full time. While all
processors must be dealers, a dealer
need not be a processor. Further,
processing is a much more laborintensive exercise than dealing.
Therefore, given the total employment
estimate for the processing sector (700
persons) and the total number of dealers
operating in the red snapper fishery
(154), and the total number of permitted
reef fish dealers, it is assumed that the
average number of employees per dealer
and the average number of employees
per processor would be unlikely to
surpass the SBA employment
benchmark and, for the purpose of this
analysis, it is determined that all red
snapper dealers and processors that
would be affected by this action are
small entities.
Although it is unknown how many
eligible shrimp permit holders will
apply for moratorium permits, and thus
be eligible to fish for shrimp in the
GOM, 2,666 vessels would qualify for
the shrimp permit and are assumed to
constitute the potential affected
universe of shrimp vessels. The average
annual gross revenue (all harvest
species) per qualifying vessel in 2005
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
75224
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
was approximately $116,000, while the
comparable figure for active qualifying
vessels (vessels that recorded shrimp
harvests) is approximately $152,000. In
the same year, the maximum annual
gross revenue from shrimp by a vessel
was approximately $757,000 for both all
qualifying and active qualifying vessels,
whereas the maximum annual gross
revenue from all harvest species was
approximately $1.89 million by an
inactive qualifier and $757,000 for an
active qualifier. This indicates that the
inactive qualifier found activity in other
fisheries more lucrative than
participation in the shrimp fishery, and
the most active qualifier operated
exclusively in the shrimp fishery. Fleet
activity is also known to exist in the
commercial shrimp fishery, but the
magnitude of such activity cannot be
determined with available data. Given
these findings, for the purpose of this
analysis, it is determined that all shrimp
vessels that would be affected by this
action are small entities.
In 2005, 609 dealers were identified
operating in the commercial shrimp
fishery. Employment information for
this sector is not available. In 2004, 61
processors in the shrimp fishery were
identified, employing approximately
3,700 persons, or an average of 61
employees per entity. Similar to the
finfish sector, shrimp processing is more
labor intensive than dealing, so average
employment in the shrimp dealer sector
is assumed to be less than that in the
processing sector. Since the average
employment per entity does not exceed
the SBA threshold, it is determined, for
this analysis, that all shrimp dealers and
processors that could be affected by this
action are small entities.
This proposed rule would not change
current reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements (other
than the proposed measures described
herein) under either the Reef Fish or
Shrimp FMPs. Preexisting requirements
include qualification criteria for for-hire
vessel permits and participation in
additional data collection programs if
selected by NMFS. All of the
information elements required for these
processes are standard elements
essential to the successful operation of
a fishing business and should, therefore,
already be collected and maintained as
standard operating practice by the
business. The requirements do not
require professional skills.
This proposed rule would be expected
to affect all vessels that operate in the
commercial red snapper fishery, all
vessels that have a Federal reef fish forhire permit, and all vessels that qualify
for a commercial shrimp fishery
moratorium permit. The proposed
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:28 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
action would also be expected to affect
all reef fish and shrimp dealers and
processors that handle product from
these fisheries. All such entities have
been determined, for the purpose of this
analysis, to be small entities. Therefore,
it is determined that the proposed
action will affect a substantial number
of small entities.
Commercial red snapper fishing
vessels, for-hire operations, and red
snapper dealers would be expected to
bear the primary burden of the proposed
actions, though spill-over impacts
would be expected in associated
industries, such as marinas and fishery
suppliers. The net result of the
combined proposed TAC reduction and
commercial minimum size limit
decrease for the commercial red snapper
fishery would be expected to be an
approximate 28–percent decline in net
revenues, or approximately $7.0
million. Although over 750 entities are
currently permitted to operate in the
commercial red snapper fishery (136
entities with Class 1 licenses and 628
entities with Class 2 licenses), 131
vessels accounted for approximately 94
percent of the red snapper harvests from
2002–2005, which had an average exvessel value of approximately $11.18
million out of total average annual exvessel revenues for all fishing activity
by these entities of approximately
$17.34 million. Since most commercial
red snapper fishing entities operate in
multiple fisheries, the projected $7.0
million reduction in net revenues
captures lost revenue for all species.
During 2002–2005, the top 50
harvesters in the commercial red
snapper fishery averaged approximately
$144,000 in ex-vessel revenue per year
out of total finfish revenues of
approximately $211,000, indicating
approximately 68 percent of the total
revenues came from red snapper. The
second tier vessels averaged
approximately $40,000 in red snapper
revenues and approximately $84,000
total revenues, or 48 percent of total
revenues coming from red snapper.
Combined, the top 131 vessels averaged
approximately $80,000 per year from
red snapper, $132,000 total revenues,
and 60 percent of total revenues coming
from red snapper. The remaining vessels
that landed red snapper accounted for
only approximately $700 per vessel per
year from red snapper, out of total
average revenues of $14,000, or
approximately 5 percent from red
snapper. Red snapper most likely
constitutes a bycatch species for this
third-tier group.
A TAC reduction would most likely
be expected to impact operations that
target red snapper rather than those that
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
incidentally harvest red snapper. If the
entire quota reduction is assumed borne
by the top 50 and 131 vessels,
respectively, the reduction in net
revenues would equate to
approximately $140,000 and $53,000 for
the two groups, respectively. Relating
these figures to the averages provided in
the previous paragraph is difficult
because the annual averages represent
gross ex-vessel values, whereas the
losses represent net values, and the
expected losses incorporate an expected
increase of approximately $1.14 in the
price per pound of red snapper expected
to develop as a result of the IFQ
program. This price increase equates to
a 47.5–percent increase in the average
price per pound over 2002–2005 ($11.65
million per year/4.66 million lb (2.11
million kg) = $2.40 per pound; $1.14/
$2.40 = 47.5 percent). If the annual
average red snapper revenues presented
above are inflated by this 47.5–percent
factor, the resultant values per vessel are
$212,400 in red snapper revenues and
$279,400 total revenues for the top 50
vessels, and $118,000 and $170,000 in
red snapper and total revenues,
respectively, for the top 131 vessels.
Because the projected losses are across
all species, the projected losses
($140,000 and $53,000) equate to
approximately 50 percent of total net
revenues ($140,000/$279,400) for the
top 50 vessels and approximately 31
percent of total net revenues ($53,000/
$170,000) for the top 131 vessels.
An alternative perspective is to
consider the number of vessels
projected to operate under the IFQ
program. Under the IFQ program, the
commercial red snapper fleet is
expected to consolidate to 39–95
vessels, the range determined by
whether the fleet gravitates to
exclusively larger vessels (65–foot
vessels) or small vessels (35–foot
vessels). The period of time required to
achieve this consolidation is not known,
but a reduced TAC may accelerate the
consolidation. Of course any IFQ-related
consolidation is voluntary, vessels are
compensated for their exit (through sale
of their quota shares), and exiting
vessels may continue to operate in other
fisheries. Under the proposed TAC
reduction, the resultant fleet is projected
to be 28–68 vessels, or 11–27 fewer
vessels than the status quo, with the
range again determined by whether the
fleet is primarily large vessels (28
vessels), or small vessels (68 vessels).
Average performance of the fleet under
the status quo (39–95 vessels) is
estimated at approximately $274,000
($26.0 million over 95 vessels) to
$667,000 ($26.0 million over 39 vessels)
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
in net revenues. The projected loss of
$7.0 million in net revenues under the
proposed TAC reduction would be
expected to reduce these values to
approximately $200,000 and $487,000,
respectively, or reductions of 27
percent.
The for-hire sector would be expected
to lose approximately 2,000 trips in the
charter vessel sector, 643 angler days in
the headboat sector, and $43,000 overall
in producer surplus as a result of the
proposed action. These reductions
would not be expected to occur
uniformly across all operations because
some vessels are more active in the red
snapper fishery than others. If averaged
over the 1,625 vessels active in the forhire fleet, these reductions amount to
fewer than 2 trips and $30 per permitted
vessel.
The expenditures to related
businesses associated with the expected
trip losses in the for-hire and private
angler sectors would also be expected to
be lost as a result of the proposed
action. These trips, however, represent
less than 1 percent of the total effort
directed at the species encompassed in
the assessment (red snapper, grouper,
dolphin, and king mackerel).
The proposed target bycatch
reduction goal that would apply to the
commercial shrimp fishery is
administrative in nature and would not
be expected to have any direct economic
impact on any entities in the directed or
associated sectors.
Five alternatives, including the status
quo, were considered for the action to
set TAC in the red snapper fishery.
Three of the alternatives contained
multiple options and sub-options to
manage the recreational fishery under
the respective TAC. The first alternative,
the status quo, would not have achieved
progress towards eliminating
overfishing, and would increase the
necessary reduction in subsequent years
to allow the resource to continue on the
designated recovery path, thereby
increasing short-term adverse economic
impacts relative to the proposed action,
and would not meet NMFS objectives.
The second alternative to the
proposed TAC would have reduced the
red snapper TAC to 7.0 million lb (3.2
million kg). Although this alternative
has the potential of generating,
depending upon the sub-option
selected, lower first-year adverse
economic impacts than the proposed 6.5
million lb (3.0 million kg), this TAC
would require greater TAC reduction in
subsequent years, with greater adverse
economic impacts than the proposed
action.
The third alternative to the proposed
TAC would have reduced the red
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:28 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
snapper TAC to 6.0 million lb (2.7
million kg). This alternative would have
reduced the TAC greater than necessary
to end overfishing consistent with the
current rebuilding plan and would be
expected to result in greater adverse
economic impacts, ranging from losses
in economic value (consumer and
producer surplus) in the recreational
sector of approximately $16.0 million to
$27.0 million and a loss of
approximately $8.5 million in net
revenues in the commercial sector, than
the proposed action, which is expected
to result in a reduction of consumer and
producer surplus of approximately
$15.0 million in the recreational sector
and a reduction in net revenues of $7.0
million in the commercial sector.
The fourth alternative to the proposed
TAC would have reduced the red
snapper TAC to 5.0 million lbs (2.3
million kg). This alternative would have
reduced the TAC greater than necessary
to end overfishing consistent with the
current rebuilding plan and would be
expected to result in greater adverse
economic impacts, ranging from losses
in economic value in the recreational
sector of approximately $23.0 million to
$25.0 million and a loss of
approximately $11.5 million in net
revenues in the commercial sector, than
the proposed action.
Two alternatives, the proposed
alternative and the status quo, were
considered for the action to set the
captain and crew red snapper bag limit.
The status quo, would be expected to
decrease the ability of meeting harvest
reduction targets and would have
required more restrictive measures on
recreational anglers, resulting in
increased adverse economic impacts
relative to the proposed action.
Three alternatives, including the
status quo, were considered for the
commercial red snapper minimum size
limit. The first alternative to the
proposed action, the status quo
alternative, would be expected to result
in continued unnecessary bycatch
mortality and would not, therefore, meet
NMFS objectives.
The second alternative to the
proposed action would eliminate the
commercial minimum size limit
entirely. Because no commercial market
is known to exist for red snapper
smaller than 12 inches (30 cm), the
expected economic impacts for this
alternative relative to those of the
proposed action are virtually identical.
However, maintaining some minimum
size limit in the commercial sector, as
would be accomplished by the proposed
action, would be expected to generate
unquantifiable economic benefits
accruing to a perception of greater sector
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
75225
equity and avoidance of user conflict
since the proposed action would
decrease the incentive for commercial
operations to move their fishing location
to areas where smaller fish congregate.
Four alternatives, including the
proposed status quo alternative, were
considered for the gear requirements.
The proposed action would not impose
any new gear requirements on
fishermen and would not result in any
direct adverse economic impacts on
these entities. Each of the three
alternatives to the proposed action
would be expected to result in greater
adverse economic impacts than the
proposed action through either
increased gear costs or lowered
operating efficiency. Given the shortterm nature of the action, these adverse
impacts would not be expected to be
balanced by the economic benefits of
improved stock conditions. Thus, each
alternative would be expected to
increase costs without demonstrable
benefits and, thus, would not meet
NMFS objectives.
Three alternatives, including the
status quo, were considered for the red
snapper bycatch mortality reduction
target in the commercial shrimp fishery.
The status quo would not have
established a bycatch reduction target,
would not ensure consistent reductions
in bycatch fishing mortality of juvenile
red snapper in the shrimp fishery, and
would not meet NMFS objectives. The
second alternative to the proposed
bycatch reduction target would establish
a higher reduction target than the
proposed action. Although this would
be an administrative action with no
expected direct adverse economic
effects, the higher target exceeds the
level of bycatch reduction the fishery
has demonstrated to date and would,
therefore, be expected to require further
effort reductions, resulting in greater
adverse economic impacts than the
proposed action.
Four alternatives, including the
proposed status quo alternative, were
considered for effort reduction in the
commercial shrimp fishery. The
proposed status quo would not impose
any effort controls on the fishery and
would not be expected to result in any
adverse economic impacts. Each of the
other alternatives would have imposed
effort limitations in the shrimp fishery
and would, therefore, be expected to
result in greater adverse economic
impacts than the proposed action,
ranging from $7.8 million to $14.8
million in lost ex-vessel revenues,
fishery-wide. These impacts would be
expected to be borne by 394–863
vessels. Although some behavioral
changes would be expected to mitigate
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
75226
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 240 / Thursday, December 14, 2006 / Proposed Rules
these losses, the nature of these changes
and their net impact cannot be
determined.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: December 8, 2006.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) Red snapper—3.315 million lb
(1.504 million kg), round weight.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Recreational quota for red
snapper. The following quota applies to
persons who harvest red snapper other
than under commercial vessel permits
for Gulf reef fish and the commercial
quota specified in paragraph (a)(1)(v) of
this section—3.185 million lb (1.445
million kg), round weight.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 06–9676 Filed 12–11–06; 10:01 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.37, paragraph (d)(1)(iv) is
suspended and paragraph (d)(1)(vi) is
added to read as follows:
50 CFR Part 648
§ 622.37
Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
Council; Public Hearings
Size limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) Red snapper—16 inches (40.6
cm), TL, for a fish taken by a person
subject to the bag limit specified in
§ 622.39(b)(1)(iii) and 13 inches (38.1
cm), TL, for a fish taken by a person not
subject to the bag limit.
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 622.39, paragraphs (b)(1)(iii)
and (b)(1)(v) are suspended and
paragraphs (b)(1)(viii) and (b)(1)(ix) are
added to read as follows:
§ 622.39
Bag and possession limits.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) Red snapper—2. However, no
red snapper may be retained by the
captain or crew of a vessel operating as
a charter vessel or headboat—their bag
limit is zero.
(ix) Gulf reef fish, combined,
excluding those specified in paragraphs
(b)(1)(i), (ii), (iv), (vi), (vii), and (viii) of
this section and excluding dwarf sand
perch and sand perch—20, but not to
exceed 10 vermilion snapper.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 622.42, paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and
(a)(2) are suspended and paragraphs
(a)(1)(v) and (a)(3) are added to read as
follows:
§ 622.42
*
*
Quotas.
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
17:28 Dec 13, 2006
Jkt 211001
[I.D. 120606A]
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public hearing
meetings; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council is developing
Amendment 14 to the Summer
Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass
FMP to implement a rebuilding plan to
rebuild the scup stock to the stock level
associated with maximum sustainable
yield (BMSY) and make the scup Gear
Restricted Areas (GRAs) currently
addressed and modified through the
annual specification setting process
modifiable though frameworks to the
FMP.
Written comments will be
accepted until January 26, 2007. All
public hearings will begin at 7 p.m. The
dates and locations of the meetings are
as follows:
• Monday, January 22, 2007: Hilton
Garden Inn Providence Airport/
Warwick, One Thuber Street,Warwick,
RI 02886.
• Tuesday, January 23, 2007: Best
Western East End, 1830 Route 25,
Riverhead, NY 11901.
• Wednesday, January 24, 2007:
Holiday Inn, 290 State Highway 37 East,
Toms River, NJ 08753.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Comments may be
submitted through any of the following
methods:
• Mail: Daniel T. Furlong, Executive
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council, 300 S. New
Street, Dover, DE 19904
• Fax: 302–674–5399
• Email: info@mafmc.org
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel T. Furlong, Executive Director of
the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management,
302–674–2331, ext. 19.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Background
The purpose of these public meetings
is to allow stakeholder groups and
interested parties to comment on actions
proposed in Amendment 14 to the
Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea
Bass FMP. In August 2005, NMFS
notified the Council that the scup stock
has officially been designated as
overfished. Therefore, the purpose of
this amendment is to develop a
rebuilding plan for the scup stock,
thereby preventing overfishing and
rebuilding the scup stock to the level
associated with maximum sustainable
yield (BMSY). In addition, the scup Gear
Restricted Areas (GRAs) currently
addressed and modified through the
annual specification setting process
would be made modifiable through
frameworks to the FMP. This action is
needed to improve the timing of
implementation of modifications to the
GRAs and allow those actions to be
expedited through framework
documents as opposed to annual
specifications. The Amendment
document that will be used at the
meetings will be mailed to all entities
on the Council’s mailing list. Additional
copies are readily available from the
above address or via the Internet at
https://www.mafmc.org/mid-atlantic/
comments/comments.htm .
Special Accommodations
The hearings are physically accessible
to people with disabilities. Requests for
sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Jan
Bryan (302–674–2331 ext: 18) at the
Mid-Atlantic Council office at least 5
days prior to the hearing date.
Dated: December 6, 2006.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–21235 Filed 12–13–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
E:\FR\FM\14DEP1.SGM
14DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 240 (Thursday, December 14, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75220-75226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9676]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 061121304-6304-01; I.D. 112006B]
RIN 0648-AT87
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic;
Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Gulf Red Snapper Management
Measures
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed temporary rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would implement interim measures to reduce
overfishing of Gulf red snapper. This proposed rule would reduce the
commercial and recreational quotas for red snapper, reduce the
commercial minimum size limit for red snapper, reduce the recreational
bag limit for Gulf red snapper, prohibit the retention of red snapper
under the bag limit for captain and crew of a vessel operating as a
charter vessel or headboat, and establish a target level of reduction
of shrimp trawl bycatch mortality of red
[[Page 75221]]
snapper. The public comment period on the proposed rule will end on
January 26, 2007, to provide the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council and the public the opportunity to discuss and comment on the
rule at the January Council meeting. The intended effect is to reduce
overfishing of red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 26, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on the proposed rule by any of the
following methods:
E-mail: 0648-AT87.Proposed@noaa.gov. Include in the
subject line the following document identifier: 0648-AT87.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Peter Hood, Southeast Regional Office, NMFS, 263
13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Fax: 727-824-5308; Attention: Peter Hood.
Copies of documents supporting this proposed rule, which includes a
draft environmental impact statement (DEIS), and an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis (IRFA), may be obtained from Peter Hood, Southeast
Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Hood, telephone: 727-551-5784,
fax: 727-824-5308, e-mail: peter.hood@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The red snapper fishery of the Gulf of
Mexico is managed under the Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for the Reef
Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico and the shrimp fishery is managed
under the FMP for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico. The FMPs
were prepared by the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council
(Council) and are implemented under the authority of the Magnuson-
Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act)
by regulations at 50 CFR part 622.
Background
The Gulf of Mexico red snapper stock is overfished and undergoing
overfishing. Multiple fisheries influence the status of this stock,
including the commercial and recreational red snapper fisheries, and
the shrimp trawl fishery which takes red snapper incidentally when
harvesting shrimp. The competing interests and goals of these multiple
fisheries challenge fishery managers to balance multiple tradeoffs in
rebuilding the red snapper stock.
The first rebuilding plan established in 1990 has been revised
several times, including extension of the target date for rebuilding
the stock, in response to new data and assessments which have provided
a better understanding of stock biomass and influencing factors,
including shrimp trawl bycatch mortality. The current rebuilding plan,
implemented in 2005, is designed to end overfishing in 2009/2010 and
rebuild the stock by 2032 to the biomass level needed to allow harvest
at maximum sustainable yield on a continuing basis. The most recent
stock assessment (2005) indicates red snapper catch and discard
mortality in the directed red snapper fishery and bycatch mortality
rates in the shrimp fishery are jeopardizing the success of the current
rebuilding plan. In the western Gulf, the shrimp trawl fishery
represents the greatest source of red snapper fishing mortality,
followed by the commercial red snapper directed fishery, whereas the
directed red snapper recreational fishery represents the greatest
source of fishing mortality in the eastern Gulf. The eastern Gulf and
western Gulf are separated by the Mississippi River delta.
At the August 2006 Council meeting, the Council voted to delay
consideration of regulatory actions needed to address red snapper
overfishing until more recent data and information become available for
the directed red snapper and shrimp trawl fisheries. However,
postponing development of a plan amendment would further delay progress
in stock recovery because measures to address overfishing would not
occur during the 2007 fishing season.
To address overfishing of the red snapper stock for 2007, NMFS is
proposing this rule that would reduce fishing mortality in 2007 and
allow progress towards rebuilding this stock until more permanent
measures could be established to end overfishing. This proposed rule
would also address overfishing by establishing a red snapper bycatch
reduction goal for the shrimp fishery.
Provisions of This Proposed Rule
This proposed rule would reduce fishing mortality on red snapper in
2007 by reducing harvest and bycatch levels. Specifically, this
proposed rule would: (1) reduce the red snapper total allowable catch
(TAC) from 9.12 million lb (4.14 million kg) to 6.5 million lb (2.9
million kg), whole weight, resulting in a commercial quota of 3.315
million lb (1.504 million kg) and a recreational quota of 3.185 million
lb (1.445 million kg); (2) reduce the daily red snapper recreational
bag limit from four to two fish per person; establish a 0-fish red
snapper bag limit for the captain and crew of a vessel operating as a
charter vessel or headboat; (3) reduce the commercial minimum size
limit from 15 inches (38 cm) to 13 inches (33 cm), total length; and
(4) establish a target reduction goal for shrimp trawl bycatch
mortality on red snapper that is 50 percent less than shrimp trawl
bycatch mortality during the 2001-2003 benchmark years used in the 2005
stock assessment.
Measures to Reduce Directed Fishing Mortality
In developing this proposed rule, NMFS evaluated measures for TAC
and the recreational fishery based on a qualitative assumption that
some level of reduction in landings has occurred due to the direct
effects of hurricanes and increased fuel costs during 2004 and 2005.
Sufficient data are not available at this time to quantify fully the
precise level of reduction, although preliminary recreational data
suggests a decrease in landings has occurred in 2006.
The Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that NMFS manage the red snapper
fishery to ensure harvest is constrained to the available quotas. For
the commercial fishery, the 3.315 million-lb (1.504 million-kg) quota
will be managed through an individual fishing quota (IFQ) program
beginning in 2007. For the recreational fishery, NMFS previously has
employed bag limits, size limits, and seasonal closures in an effort to
constrain harvest to the available quota while minimizing, to the
extent practicable, the short-term adverse economic and social impacts.
Reduction of TAC
This proposed rule would reduce the red snapper TAC for 2007 to 6.5
million lb (2.9 million kg), which is 0.5 million lb (0.23 million kg)
less than the maximum allowable biological catch (ABC). Based on the
2005 stock assessment, TACs greater than 5 million lb (2.3 million kg)
would not be expected to end overfishing immediately. TACs set at 5
million lb (2.3 million kg) or less during 2007 would end overfishing
immediately, but only if all sources of fishing mortality (directed
harvest, shrimp trawl bycatch, and closed season discards) could be
reduced to the fishing mortality rate associated with harvesting the
stock at the maximum sustainable yield. TACs greater than 5 million lb
(2.3 million kg) but less than 7 million lb (3.2 million kg) would
reduce fishing mortality and continue to allow rebuilding progress in
[[Page 75222]]
2007 consistent with the current rebuilding plan which ends overfishing
in 2009. The Council would need to recommend more permanent TACs within
or below this range after 2007 to be consistent with the current
rebuilding plan over the long-term. The higher the TAC is set in 2007,
the lower the TAC will need to be set in the future to end overfishing
by 2009 to maintain adequate progress under the current rebuilding
plan.
Bag Limit Reductions
Assuming some level of reduction in recreational landings has
occurred due to hurricanes and increased fuel prices, based on
preliminary data, the combined effect of reducing the daily
recreational bag limit from 4 to 2 fish per person and reducing the
captain and crew bag limit for vessels operating as charter vessels or
headboats to zero should control harvest sufficiently to ensure the
recreational fishery remains within its 3.185 million-lb (1.445
million-kg) recreational quota while maintaining the current
recreational fishing season. Reducing the bag limit is estimated to
achieve at least a 17-percent reduction in harvest, and, therefore,
would benefit red snapper stock recovery. Reducing the captain and crew
bag limit to zero is estimated to reduce red snapper landings by
approximately 2 percent. The reduction from these two measures,
combined with the reduction in landings attributed to the effects of
hurricanes and increased fuel prices, would allow the recreational
fishery to maintain its current 194-day recreational fishing season
(April 21 October 31) for 2007.
Measures to Reduce Bycatch Mortality
For the red snapper stock to recover in a manner consistent with
the current rebuilding plan, bycatch mortality must be minimized. This
proposed rule addresses two sources of bycatch mortality -discard
mortality in the directed commercial fishery and bycatch mortality in
the shrimp fishery.
Reduction in the Commercial Minimum Size Limit
To reduce the number of red snapper discarded dead in the directed
commercial red snapper fishery, this proposed rule would reduce the
commercial minimum size limit from 15 to 13 inches (38 to 33 cm), total
length. Red snapper discard mortality rates in the directed commercial
fishery are very high--estimated to range between 71 and 82 percent. By
reducing the commercial minimum size limit, fish between 13 and 15
inches (33 and 38 cm) would be retained and counted toward the quota
rather than discarded, mostly dead, as bycatch. It is estimated that
reducing the commercial minimum size limit by 2 inches (5 cm) would
reduce the commercial red snapper fishery's dead discards by 40 to 60
percent.
NMFS carefully considered reducing the recreational minimum size
limit but is not proposing to do so in this rulemaking because there is
currently no scientific information to indicate a reduction in the
recreational minimum size limit would reduce overfishing. This rule is
being promulgated consistent with the provision of section 305(c) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act relating to interim measures needed to reduce
overfishing. Measures that do not reduce overfishing would not be
consistent with the regulatory authority provided in that provision of
section 305(c).
Establishment of a Target Reduction for Shrimp Trawl Bycatch Mortality
To facilitate reduction of red snapper bycatch mortality in the
shrimp fishery, the proposed rule would establish a target reduction in
the shrimp trawl red snapper bycatch mortality rate that is 50 percent
less than the bycatch mortality rate during the benchmark years, 2001-
2003, used in the 2005 red snapper stock assessment. This target
reflects the level of shrimp trawl effort documented in 2005 in areas
where red snapper are abundant in the western Gulf of Mexico, compared
to the level of effort during the benchmark years. The target goal does
not meet the current rebuilding plan target mortality reduction level
necessary to rebuild the red snapper stock. However, preliminary
information for 2006 suggests effort in the shrimp fishery has
continued to decline in offshore waters of the western Gulf of Mexico.
Therefore, similar to the assumption applied to the directed red
snapper fishery, NMFS is making a qualitative assumption effort for
2006 and 2007 will likely be less than the level of effort documented
during 2005 for areas where red snapper are commonly taken. Additional
bycatch mortality reduction is expected from the introduction of new
bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) for the fishery under a pending
revision to the certification criterion for BRDs. In combination, NMFS
estimates red snapper bycatch mortality attributable to the shrimp
fishery over the next few years may closely approximate the needed
reductions from the benchmark years of 2001-2003, while allowing the
industry some flexibility in achieving optimum yield, as it is
currently defined for the fishery.
The Council may recommend a different course of action for a long-
term management strategy to control shrimp trawl bycatch mortality of
red snapper; however, the proposed reduction target would provide an
interim means to address shrimp trawl bycatch in 2007. NMFS intends to
provide 2006 shrimp trawl effort information to the Council as soon as
it is available. If shrimp effort for 2006 is above the target, the
Council may recommend further action in 2007 to maintain the proposed
reductions in shrimp effort in areas of the western Gulf of Mexico
where red snapper are most abundant.
Future Action
NMFS believes that this proposed rule is necessary to reduce
overfishing of red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico. NMFS will consider
all public comments received on this proposed rule in determining
whether to proceed with a final rule and, if so, whether any revisions
would be appropriate in the final rule. If NMFS issues a final rule, it
would be effective for not more than 180 days, as authorized by section
305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The final rule could be extended
for an additional 180 days, provided that the public has had an
opportunity to comment on the rule.
NMFS acknowledges the need to continue monitoring all sources of
red snapper mortality to determine the appropriate level of future
actions necessary to ensure progress consistent with the stock
rebuilding plan over the long term.
Classification
At this time, NMFS has not determined whether the interim measures
which this proposed rule would implement, are consistent with the
national standards of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable
laws. NMFS, in making that determination, will take into account the
data, views, and comments received during the comment period on this
proposed rule.
This proposed rule has been determined to be significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
NMFS prepared a draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for
this action; a notice of availability was published on October 13, 2006
(71 FR 60509).
NMFS prepared an IRFA, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, for this proposed rule. The IRFA describes the
economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small
entities. A description of the action, why it is being considered, and
the objectives of, and legal basis for this action are contained
[[Page 75223]]
at the beginning of this section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY
section of the preamble. A copy of the full analysis is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A summary of the IRFA follows.
This proposed rule would reduce TAC in the red snapper fishery,
lower the recreational red snapper bag limit to 2 fish, lower the red
snapper bag limit for captain and crew of a vessel operating as a
charter vessel or headboat to 0 fish, reduce the red snapper minimum
size limit in the commercial fishery to 13 inches (33 cm), and
establish a reduction goal for red snapper bycatch mortality in the
commercial shrimp fishery. The purpose for this action is to address
overfishing of the red snapper stock on a temporary basis while the
Council develops a comprehensive plan to reduce directed and incidental
red snapper fishing mortality rates in the red snapper and shrimp
fisheries. The Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the statutory basis for
the proposed rule.
No duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting Federal rules have been
identified.
This proposed action would be expected to impact red snapper
commercial fishers and for-hire operators, and reef fish dealers and
processors participating in the red snapper trade. The proposed action
and certain proposed alternatives would also apply to the commercial
shrimp fishery. However, these shrimp-related alternatives would either
maintain the status quo, or otherwise accommodate current conditions,
such that no direct impacts are expected to accrue at this time.
Nevertheless, a description of the entities in the shrimp fishery is
included in the following discussion.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size
criteria for all major industry sectors in the U.S. including fish
harvesters, for-hire operations, fish processors, and fish dealers. A
business involved in fish harvesting is classified as a small business
if it is independently owned and operated, is not dominant in its field
of operation (including its affiliates), and has combined annual
receipts not in excess of $4.0 million (NAICS code 114111, finfish
fishing) for all affiliated operations worldwide. For for-hire
operations, the other qualifiers apply and the annual receipts
threshold is $6.5 million (NAICS code 713990, recreational industries).
For seafood processor and dealers, the SBA uses an employee threshold
rather than a receipts threshold, or 500 or fewer persons on a full-
time, part-time, temporary, or other basis, at all affiliated
operations for a seafood processor and 100 or fewer persons for a
seafood dealer.
Currently, 136 entities hold Class 1 licenses that allow a
commercial vessel trip limit of up to 2,000 lb (907 kg) of red snapper
and 628 entities hold Class 2 licenses that allow a trip limit of up to
200 lb (91 kg) of red snapper. Between 2002 and 2004, the top 50 red
snapper vessels harvested a total of 2.77 million lbs (1.26 million kg)
of red snapper, on average, or 64 percent of the industry total.
Vessels ranked 51 to 131 harvested 1.29 million lbs (0.58 million kg),
on average, or 30 percent of the industry total for the same period. In
total, the top 131 vessels accounted for approximately 94 percent of
the total red snapper commercial landings. Red snapper are mainly
harvested by vertical line fishermen, who accounted for approximately
90 percent of commercial red snapper Gulf harvests, on average, between
2002 and 2004.
Reported average annual gross receipts (2004 dollars) of commercial
reef fish vessels in the GOM range from $24,095 for low-volume vertical
line vessels to $116,989 for high-volume longline vessels. Annual net
incomes range from $4,479 for low-volume vertical line vessels to
$28,466 for high-volume vertical line vessels. Some fleet activity is
known to exist in the commercial red snapper fishery, but the extent of
such activity is unknown. The maximum number of reef fish permits
reported owned by the same person/entity is six permits. Additional
permits (and the revenues associated with those permits) may be linked
to an entity through affiliation rules, but such affiliation links
cannot be made using existing data. A definitive determination of
whether any commercial entities would be considered large entities
cannot be made using average income information. However, based on the
size and value of the commercial red snapper fishery (an average of
4.336 million lb (1.967 million kg) and $11.652 million ex-vessel
revenue per year, 2002-2004), the number of participants in the fishery
(136 Class 1 licenses and 628 Class 2 licenses), the summary statistics
provided above, and maximum number of permits owned by a single entity,
it is determined, for the purpose of this assessment, that all
commercial reef fish harvest entities that would be affected by this
action are small entities.
Currently, 1,625 vessels are estimated to be permitted to operate
in the Gulf reef fish fishery in the for-hire sector. Fleet behavior
also exists in this sector, with at least one entity reported to hold
12 permits. The bulk of the fishery, however, consists of single-permit
operations.
The for-hire fleet is comprised of charterboats, which charge a fee
on a vessel basis, and headboats, which charge a fee on an individual
angler (head) basis. The average charterboat is estimated to generate
$76,960 in annual revenues and $36,758 in annual profits, whereas the
appropriate values for the average headboat are $404,172 and $338,209,
respectively. The calculation of costs does not include fixed and other
non-operating expenses, which tend to be higher for headboats.
Based on the average revenue figures, it is determined, for the
purpose of this assessment, that all for-hire operations that would be
affected by this action are small entities.
The measures in this action would also be expected to affect fish
dealers, particularly those that receive red snapper from harvesting
vessels. Two hundred and twenty-seven dealers currently have the
required Federal permit to buy and sell commercial reef fish species.
All processors would be included in this total since all processors
must be dealers. From 1997-2002, an average of 154 dealers purchased
red snapper from commercial vessels. Average employment information per
reef fish dealer is unknown. Although dealers and processors are not
synonymous entities, reported total employment for reef fish processors
in the Southeast is estimated to be approximately 700 individuals, both
part and full time. While all processors must be dealers, a dealer need
not be a processor. Further, processing is a much more labor-intensive
exercise than dealing. Therefore, given the total employment estimate
for the processing sector (700 persons) and the total number of dealers
operating in the red snapper fishery (154), and the total number of
permitted reef fish dealers, it is assumed that the average number of
employees per dealer and the average number of employees per processor
would be unlikely to surpass the SBA employment benchmark and, for the
purpose of this analysis, it is determined that all red snapper dealers
and processors that would be affected by this action are small
entities.
Although it is unknown how many eligible shrimp permit holders will
apply for moratorium permits, and thus be eligible to fish for shrimp
in the GOM, 2,666 vessels would qualify for the shrimp permit and are
assumed to constitute the potential affected universe of shrimp
vessels. The average annual gross revenue (all harvest species) per
qualifying vessel in 2005
[[Page 75224]]
was approximately $116,000, while the comparable figure for active
qualifying vessels (vessels that recorded shrimp harvests) is
approximately $152,000. In the same year, the maximum annual gross
revenue from shrimp by a vessel was approximately $757,000 for both all
qualifying and active qualifying vessels, whereas the maximum annual
gross revenue from all harvest species was approximately $1.89 million
by an inactive qualifier and $757,000 for an active qualifier. This
indicates that the inactive qualifier found activity in other fisheries
more lucrative than participation in the shrimp fishery, and the most
active qualifier operated exclusively in the shrimp fishery. Fleet
activity is also known to exist in the commercial shrimp fishery, but
the magnitude of such activity cannot be determined with available
data. Given these findings, for the purpose of this analysis, it is
determined that all shrimp vessels that would be affected by this
action are small entities.
In 2005, 609 dealers were identified operating in the commercial
shrimp fishery. Employment information for this sector is not
available. In 2004, 61 processors in the shrimp fishery were
identified, employing approximately 3,700 persons, or an average of 61
employees per entity. Similar to the finfish sector, shrimp processing
is more labor intensive than dealing, so average employment in the
shrimp dealer sector is assumed to be less than that in the processing
sector. Since the average employment per entity does not exceed the SBA
threshold, it is determined, for this analysis, that all shrimp dealers
and processors that could be affected by this action are small
entities.
This proposed rule would not change current reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements (other than the
proposed measures described herein) under either the Reef Fish or
Shrimp FMPs. Preexisting requirements include qualification criteria
for for-hire vessel permits and participation in additional data
collection programs if selected by NMFS. All of the information
elements required for these processes are standard elements essential
to the successful operation of a fishing business and should,
therefore, already be collected and maintained as standard operating
practice by the business. The requirements do not require professional
skills.
This proposed rule would be expected to affect all vessels that
operate in the commercial red snapper fishery, all vessels that have a
Federal reef fish for-hire permit, and all vessels that qualify for a
commercial shrimp fishery moratorium permit. The proposed action would
also be expected to affect all reef fish and shrimp dealers and
processors that handle product from these fisheries. All such entities
have been determined, for the purpose of this analysis, to be small
entities. Therefore, it is determined that the proposed action will
affect a substantial number of small entities.
Commercial red snapper fishing vessels, for-hire operations, and
red snapper dealers would be expected to bear the primary burden of the
proposed actions, though spill-over impacts would be expected in
associated industries, such as marinas and fishery suppliers. The net
result of the combined proposed TAC reduction and commercial minimum
size limit decrease for the commercial red snapper fishery would be
expected to be an approximate 28-percent decline in net revenues, or
approximately $7.0 million. Although over 750 entities are currently
permitted to operate in the commercial red snapper fishery (136
entities with Class 1 licenses and 628 entities with Class 2 licenses),
131 vessels accounted for approximately 94 percent of the red snapper
harvests from 2002-2005, which had an average ex-vessel value of
approximately $11.18 million out of total average annual ex-vessel
revenues for all fishing activity by these entities of approximately
$17.34 million. Since most commercial red snapper fishing entities
operate in multiple fisheries, the projected $7.0 million reduction in
net revenues captures lost revenue for all species.
During 2002-2005, the top 50 harvesters in the commercial red
snapper fishery averaged approximately $144,000 in ex-vessel revenue
per year out of total finfish revenues of approximately $211,000,
indicating approximately 68 percent of the total revenues came from red
snapper. The second tier vessels averaged approximately $40,000 in red
snapper revenues and approximately $84,000 total revenues, or 48
percent of total revenues coming from red snapper. Combined, the top
131 vessels averaged approximately $80,000 per year from red snapper,
$132,000 total revenues, and 60 percent of total revenues coming from
red snapper. The remaining vessels that landed red snapper accounted
for only approximately $700 per vessel per year from red snapper, out
of total average revenues of $14,000, or approximately 5 percent from
red snapper. Red snapper most likely constitutes a bycatch species for
this third-tier group.
A TAC reduction would most likely be expected to impact operations
that target red snapper rather than those that incidentally harvest red
snapper. If the entire quota reduction is assumed borne by the top 50
and 131 vessels, respectively, the reduction in net revenues would
equate to approximately $140,000 and $53,000 for the two groups,
respectively. Relating these figures to the averages provided in the
previous paragraph is difficult because the annual averages represent
gross ex-vessel values, whereas the losses represent net values, and
the expected losses incorporate an expected increase of approximately
$1.14 in the price per pound of red snapper expected to develop as a
result of the IFQ program. This price increase equates to a 47.5-
percent increase in the average price per pound over 2002-2005 ($11.65
million per year/4.66 million lb (2.11 million kg) = $2.40 per pound;
$1.14/$2.40 = 47.5 percent). If the annual average red snapper revenues
presented above are inflated by this 47.5-percent factor, the resultant
values per vessel are $212,400 in red snapper revenues and $279,400
total revenues for the top 50 vessels, and $118,000 and $170,000 in red
snapper and total revenues, respectively, for the top 131 vessels.
Because the projected losses are across all species, the projected
losses ($140,000 and $53,000) equate to approximately 50 percent of
total net revenues ($140,000/$279,400) for the top 50 vessels and
approximately 31 percent of total net revenues ($53,000/$170,000) for
the top 131 vessels.
An alternative perspective is to consider the number of vessels
projected to operate under the IFQ program. Under the IFQ program, the
commercial red snapper fleet is expected to consolidate to 39-95
vessels, the range determined by whether the fleet gravitates to
exclusively larger vessels (65-foot vessels) or small vessels (35-foot
vessels). The period of time required to achieve this consolidation is
not known, but a reduced TAC may accelerate the consolidation. Of
course any IFQ-related consolidation is voluntary, vessels are
compensated for their exit (through sale of their quota shares), and
exiting vessels may continue to operate in other fisheries. Under the
proposed TAC reduction, the resultant fleet is projected to be 28-68
vessels, or 11-27 fewer vessels than the status quo, with the range
again determined by whether the fleet is primarily large vessels (28
vessels), or small vessels (68 vessels). Average performance of the
fleet under the status quo (39-95 vessels) is estimated at
approximately $274,000 ($26.0 million over 95 vessels) to $667,000
($26.0 million over 39 vessels)
[[Page 75225]]
in net revenues. The projected loss of $7.0 million in net revenues
under the proposed TAC reduction would be expected to reduce these
values to approximately $200,000 and $487,000, respectively, or
reductions of 27 percent.
The for-hire sector would be expected to lose approximately 2,000
trips in the charter vessel sector, 643 angler days in the headboat
sector, and $43,000 overall in producer surplus as a result of the
proposed action. These reductions would not be expected to occur
uniformly across all operations because some vessels are more active in
the red snapper fishery than others. If averaged over the 1,625 vessels
active in the for-hire fleet, these reductions amount to fewer than 2
trips and $30 per permitted vessel.
The expenditures to related businesses associated with the expected
trip losses in the for-hire and private angler sectors would also be
expected to be lost as a result of the proposed action. These trips,
however, represent less than 1 percent of the total effort directed at
the species encompassed in the assessment (red snapper, grouper,
dolphin, and king mackerel).
The proposed target bycatch reduction goal that would apply to the
commercial shrimp fishery is administrative in nature and would not be
expected to have any direct economic impact on any entities in the
directed or associated sectors.
Five alternatives, including the status quo, were considered for
the action to set TAC in the red snapper fishery. Three of the
alternatives contained multiple options and sub-options to manage the
recreational fishery under the respective TAC. The first alternative,
the status quo, would not have achieved progress towards eliminating
overfishing, and would increase the necessary reduction in subsequent
years to allow the resource to continue on the designated recovery
path, thereby increasing short-term adverse economic impacts relative
to the proposed action, and would not meet NMFS objectives.
The second alternative to the proposed TAC would have reduced the
red snapper TAC to 7.0 million lb (3.2 million kg). Although this
alternative has the potential of generating, depending upon the sub-
option selected, lower first-year adverse economic impacts than the
proposed 6.5 million lb (3.0 million kg), this TAC would require
greater TAC reduction in subsequent years, with greater adverse
economic impacts than the proposed action.
The third alternative to the proposed TAC would have reduced the
red snapper TAC to 6.0 million lb (2.7 million kg). This alternative
would have reduced the TAC greater than necessary to end overfishing
consistent with the current rebuilding plan and would be expected to
result in greater adverse economic impacts, ranging from losses in
economic value (consumer and producer surplus) in the recreational
sector of approximately $16.0 million to $27.0 million and a loss of
approximately $8.5 million in net revenues in the commercial sector,
than the proposed action, which is expected to result in a reduction of
consumer and producer surplus of approximately $15.0 million in the
recreational sector and a reduction in net revenues of $7.0 million in
the commercial sector.
The fourth alternative to the proposed TAC would have reduced the
red snapper TAC to 5.0 million lbs (2.3 million kg). This alternative
would have reduced the TAC greater than necessary to end overfishing
consistent with the current rebuilding plan and would be expected to
result in greater adverse economic impacts, ranging from losses in
economic value in the recreational sector of approximately $23.0
million to $25.0 million and a loss of approximately $11.5 million in
net revenues in the commercial sector, than the proposed action.
Two alternatives, the proposed alternative and the status quo, were
considered for the action to set the captain and crew red snapper bag
limit. The status quo, would be expected to decrease the ability of
meeting harvest reduction targets and would have required more
restrictive measures on recreational anglers, resulting in increased
adverse economic impacts relative to the proposed action.
Three alternatives, including the status quo, were considered for
the commercial red snapper minimum size limit. The first alternative to
the proposed action, the status quo alternative, would be expected to
result in continued unnecessary bycatch mortality and would not,
therefore, meet NMFS objectives.
The second alternative to the proposed action would eliminate the
commercial minimum size limit entirely. Because no commercial market is
known to exist for red snapper smaller than 12 inches (30 cm), the
expected economic impacts for this alternative relative to those of the
proposed action are virtually identical. However, maintaining some
minimum size limit in the commercial sector, as would be accomplished
by the proposed action, would be expected to generate unquantifiable
economic benefits accruing to a perception of greater sector equity and
avoidance of user conflict since the proposed action would decrease the
incentive for commercial operations to move their fishing location to
areas where smaller fish congregate.
Four alternatives, including the proposed status quo alternative,
were considered for the gear requirements. The proposed action would
not impose any new gear requirements on fishermen and would not result
in any direct adverse economic impacts on these entities. Each of the
three alternatives to the proposed action would be expected to result
in greater adverse economic impacts than the proposed action through
either increased gear costs or lowered operating efficiency. Given the
short-term nature of the action, these adverse impacts would not be
expected to be balanced by the economic benefits of improved stock
conditions. Thus, each alternative would be expected to increase costs
without demonstrable benefits and, thus, would not meet NMFS
objectives.
Three alternatives, including the status quo, were considered for
the red snapper bycatch mortality reduction target in the commercial
shrimp fishery. The status quo would not have established a bycatch
reduction target, would not ensure consistent reductions in bycatch
fishing mortality of juvenile red snapper in the shrimp fishery, and
would not meet NMFS objectives. The second alternative to the proposed
bycatch reduction target would establish a higher reduction target than
the proposed action. Although this would be an administrative action
with no expected direct adverse economic effects, the higher target
exceeds the level of bycatch reduction the fishery has demonstrated to
date and would, therefore, be expected to require further effort
reductions, resulting in greater adverse economic impacts than the
proposed action.
Four alternatives, including the proposed status quo alternative,
were considered for effort reduction in the commercial shrimp fishery.
The proposed status quo would not impose any effort controls on the
fishery and would not be expected to result in any adverse economic
impacts. Each of the other alternatives would have imposed effort
limitations in the shrimp fishery and would, therefore, be expected to
result in greater adverse economic impacts than the proposed action,
ranging from $7.8 million to $14.8 million in lost ex-vessel revenues,
fishery-wide. These impacts would be expected to be borne by 394-863
vessels. Although some behavioral changes would be expected to mitigate
[[Page 75226]]
these losses, the nature of these changes and their net impact cannot
be determined.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Virgin Islands.
Dated: December 8, 2006.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 622.37, paragraph (d)(1)(iv) is suspended and paragraph
(d)(1)(vi) is added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.37 Size limits.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(vi) Red snapper--16 inches (40.6 cm), TL, for a fish taken by a
person subject to the bag limit specified in Sec. 622.39(b)(1)(iii)
and 13 inches (38.1 cm), TL, for a fish taken by a person not subject
to the bag limit.
* * * * *
3. In Sec. 622.39, paragraphs (b)(1)(iii) and (b)(1)(v) are
suspended and paragraphs (b)(1)(viii) and (b)(1)(ix) are added to read
as follows:
Sec. 622.39 Bag and possession limits.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) Red snapper--2. However, no red snapper may be retained by
the captain or crew of a vessel operating as a charter vessel or
headboat--their bag limit is zero.
(ix) Gulf reef fish, combined, excluding those specified in
paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (ii), (iv), (vi), (vii), and (viii) of this
section and excluding dwarf sand perch and sand perch--20, but not to
exceed 10 vermilion snapper.
* * * * *
4. In Sec. 622.42, paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(2) are suspended
and paragraphs (a)(1)(v) and (a)(3) are added to read as follows:
Sec. 622.42 Quotas.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(v) Red snapper--3.315 million lb (1.504 million kg), round weight.
* * * * *
(3) Recreational quota for red snapper. The following quota applies
to persons who harvest red snapper other than under commercial vessel
permits for Gulf reef fish and the commercial quota specified in
paragraph (a)(1)(v) of this section--3.185 million lb (1.445 million
kg), round weight.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 06-9676 Filed 12-11-06; 10:01 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S