Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 74881-74886 [06-9682]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD
29 CFR Part 102
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY:
National Labor Relations
Board.
Proposed rule exempting three
systems of records and portions of four
other systems of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act, and
amending Agency’s existing Privacy Act
regulations.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Labor Relations
Board (NLRB) proposes to exempt three
systems of records and portions of four
other systems of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5
U.S.C. 552a, pursuant to Section (k)(2)
of that Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), and to
amend existing Privacy Act regulations
for clarity.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be received on or before January
22, 2007.
ADDRESSES: All persons who desire to
submit written comments for
consideration by the Agency regarding
the proposed rule shall mail them to the
Agency’s Privacy Officer, National
Labor Relations Board, Room 7608, 1099
14th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20570–0001, or submit them
electronically to
PrivacyActComments@nlrb.gov.
Comments may also be submitted
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov, which contains a
copy of this proposed rule.
Copies of all such communications
will be available for examination during
normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays) in the Agency’s
Reading Room, located in the Case
Records Unit, National Labor Relations
Board, Room 9201, 1099 14th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20570–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tommie Gregg, Sr., Privacy Act Officer,
National Labor Relations Board, Room
7608, 1099 14th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20570–0001, (202) 273–
2833, Tommie.Gregg@nlrb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Elsewhere
in today’s issue of the Federal Register,
the Agency is proposing twelve systems
of records under the Privacy Act of
1974, nine of which consist of an
electronic case tracking system and
associated paper or electronic files, and
the remaining three systems consist of
electronic case tracking systems only.
The Agency intends to change the
section number of its Privacy Act
regulations, currently designated as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Dec 12, 2006
Jkt 211001
Section 102.117(f)–(q) of Part 102, 29
CFR Subpart K, immediately following
the Agency’s Freedom of Information
Act regulations, by creating a new
section for the Privacy Act regulations,
in order to more clearly separate them
from the Freedom of Information Act
regulations. Under this change, the
Agency’s Privacy Act regulations will
continue to immediately follow the
Freedom of Information Act regulations
at Section 102.117(a)–(e), but will be
newly designated as Section 102.117a,
paragraphs (a) through (n), of Part 102,
29 CFR Subpart K.
The Agency also intends to amend its
Privacy Act regulations providing for
notice, access, and amendment of
Privacy Act records, Section
102.117a(a), (b), and (d) (as newly
designated), 29 CFR 102.117a(a), (b),
and (d), in order to clarify that these
provisions apply only to the extent that
requested information from the Privacy
Act system of records at issue has not
been exempted from such Privacy Act
provisions.
Pursuant to subsection (k)(2) of the
Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2)), and
for the reasons set forth below, the
Board proposes to include within the
new Section 102.117a, two additional
paragraphs (m) and (n) exempting three
systems of records (the Case Activity
Tracking System (CATS) and Associated
Regional Office Files (NLRB–25), the
Regional Advice and Injunction
Litigation System (RAILS) and
Associated Headquarters Files (NLRB–
28), and the Appeals Case Tracking
System (ACTS) and Associated
Headquarters Files (NLRB–30)), and
portions of four other systems of records
(the Judicial Case Management
System—Pending Case List (JCMS–PCL)
and Associated Headquarters Files
(NLRB–21), the Solicitor’s System (SOL)
and Associated Headquarters Files
(NLRB–23), the Special Litigation
Branch Case Tracking System (SPLIT)
and Associated Headquarters Files
(NLRB–27), and the Freedom of
Information Act Tracking System (FTS)
and Associated Agency Files (NLRB–
32)) from subsections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f) of the
Privacy Act.
Subsection (k)(2) of the Privacy Act
authorizes the head of an agency to
exempt a system of records from
subsections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f) of the Privacy
Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (f)) if the
system of records is investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement
purposes other than material within the
scope of subsection (j)(2) of the Privacy
Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2)). As indicated in
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74881
the Agency’s notice proposing the
systems of records, all or portions of
seven of the proposed systems contain
information compiled by the Agency in
the course of carrying out its law
enforcement responsibilities in
conducting unfair labor practice and
representation investigations. (All
references in this proposed rule to the
Agency’s ‘‘unfair labor practice cases’’
include the portion of such cases known
as ‘‘compliance,’’ which is the
effectuation of remedial provisions of a
settlement agreement, Board order, or
court judgment enforcing a Board order
(see NLRB Casehandling Manual, Part
Three—Compliance Proceedings,
§ 10500.1).) This information meets the
criteria of subsection (k)(2).
The requirements of subsections
(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I), and (f) of the Privacy Act, if
applied to the seven proposed systems
of records, would seriously impair the
ability of the Agency to conduct
investigations of alleged unfair labor
practice violations and representation
issues. The disclosure requirements as
set forth in the provisions for notice,
access, amendment, review, and
accountings, could enable subject
individuals to take action to avoid
detection of improper activities,
including but not limited to concealing
or destroying evidence, and
intimidating sources and witnesses, or
otherwise to interfere with the
investigation. In addition, the
requirement that information
maintained in the system be limited to
that which is relevant and necessary
could foreclose investigators from
acquiring or receiving information the
relevance and necessity of which is not
readily apparent and could only be
ascertained after a complete review and
evaluation of all the evidence.
The requirements of these subsections
are largely unnecessary given the notice
and procedural protections afforded by
the Agency’s administrative
proceedings. These protections (i.e.,
notice and, in appropriate cases,
opportunity for hearing), assure that
subject individuals will have the
opportunity to learn of the existence of,
and to challenge, those records that the
Agency uses in administrative
proceedings, and in any subsequent
judicial proceeding.
This proposed rule relates to
individuals rather than small business
entities. Accordingly, pursuant to the
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, this
rule will not have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small
business entities.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
74882
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), the Agency has determined that
this proposed rule would not impose
new recordkeeping, application,
reporting, or other types of information
collection requirements on the public.
The proposed rule will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among levels of
government. Therefore, it is determined
that this proposed rule does not have
federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
In accordance with Executive Order
12866, it has been determined that this
proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ and therefore does
not require a Regulatory Impact
Analysis.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 102
Privacy, Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
Supplementary Information section,
Part 102 of title 29, ch. I of the Code of
Federal Regulations, is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 102—RULES AND
REGULATIONS, SERIES 8
Subpart K—Records and Information
1. The authority citation for part 102
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 1, 6, National Labor
Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 151, 156). Section
102.117 also issued under section
552(a)(4)(A) of the Freedom of Information
Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)), and
Section 102.117a also issued under section
552a(j) and (k) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5
U.S.C. 552a (j) and (k)). Sections 102.143
through 102.155 also issued under section
504(c)(1) of the Equal Access to Justice Act,
as amended (5 U.S.C. 504(c)(1)).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
2. Section 102.117 of subpart K is
amended by:
a. Removing paragraphs (f) through
(q);
b. In part 102, revise all references to
paragraphs 102.117(f) through (q) to
read paragraphs 102.117a (a) through (l).
c. The heading of § 102.117 is revised
to read as follows:
§ 102.117 Freedom of Information Act
Regulations: Board materials and formal
documents available for public inspection
and copying; requests for described
records; time limit for response; appeal
from denial of request; fees for document
search and duplication; files and records
not subject to inspection.
3. Section 102.117a is added to read
as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:37 Dec 12, 2006
Jkt 059060
§ 102.117a Privacy Act Regulations:
notification as to whether a system of
records contains records pertaining to
requesting individuals; requests for access
to records, amendment of such records, or
accounting of disclosures; time limits for
response; appeal from denial of requests;
fees for document duplication; files and
records exempted from certain Privacy Act
requirements.
(a) An individual will be informed
whether a system of records maintained
by this Agency contains a record
pertaining to such individual. An
inquiry should be made in writing or in
person during normal business hours to
the official of this Agency designated for
that purpose and at the address set forth
in a notice of a system of records
published by this Agency, in a Notice of
Systems of Governmentwide Personnel
Records published by the Office of
Personnel Management, or in a Notice of
Governmentwide Systems of Records
published by the Department of Labor.
Copies of such notices, and assistance in
preparing an inquiry, may be obtained
from any Regional Office of the Board or
at the Board offices at 1099 14th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20570. The
inquiry should contain sufficient
information, as defined in the notice, to
identify the record. Reasonable
verification of the identity of the
inquirer, as described in paragraph (e) of
this section, will be required to assure
that information is disclosed to the
proper person. The Agency shall
acknowledge the inquiry in writing
within 10 days (excluding Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal public holidays)
and, wherever practicable, the
acknowledgment shall supply the
information requested. If, for good cause
shown, the Agency cannot supply the
information within 10 days, the inquirer
shall within that time period be notified
in writing of the reasons therefor and
when it is anticipated the information
will be supplied. An acknowledgment
will not be provided when the
information is supplied within the 10day period. If the Agency refuses to
inform an individual whether a system
of records contains a record pertaining
to an individual, the inquirer shall be
notified in writing of that determination
and the reasons therefor, and of the right
to obtain review of that determination
under the provisions of paragraph (f) of
this section. The provisions of this
paragraph do not apply to the extent
that requested information from the
relevant system of records has been
exempted from this Privacy Act
requirement.
(b) An individual will be permitted
access to records pertaining to such
individual contained in any system of
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
records described in the notice of
system of records published by this
Agency, or access to the accounting of
disclosures from such records. The
request for access must be made in
writing or in person during normal
business hours to the person designated
for that purpose and at the address set
forth in the published notice of system
of records. The request for access must
be made in writing or in person during
normal business hours to the person
designated for that purpose and at the
address set forth in the published notice
of system of records. Copies of such
notices, and assistance in preparing a
request for access, may be obtained from
any Regional Office of the Board or at
the Board offices at 1099 14th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20570.
Reasonable verification of the identity of
the requester, as described in paragraph
(e) of this section, shall be required to
assure that records are disclosed to the
proper person. A request for access to
records or the accounting of disclosures
from such records shall be
acknowledged in writing by the Agency
within 10 days of receipt (excluding
Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public
holidays) and, wherever practicable, the
acknowledgment shall inform the
requester whether access will be granted
and, if so, the time and location at
which the records or accounting will be
made available. If access to the record
or accounting is to be granted, the
record or accounting will normally be
provided within 30 days (excluding
Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public
holidays) of the request, unless for good
cause shown the Agency is unable to do
so, in which case the individual will be
informed in writing within that 30-day
period of the reasons therefor and when
it is anticipated that access will be
granted. An acknowledgment of a
request will not be provided if the
record is made available within the 10day period. If an individual’s request for
access to a record or an accounting of
disclosure from such a record under the
provisions of this paragraph is denied,
the notice informing the individual of
the denial shall set forth the reasons
therefor and advise the individual of the
right to obtain a review of that
determination under the provisions of
paragraph (f) of this section. The
provisions of this paragraph do not
apply to the extent that requested
information from the relevant system of
records has been exempted from this
Privacy Act requirement.
(c) An individual granted access to
records pertaining to such individual
contained in a system of records may
review all such records. For that
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
purpose the individual may be
accompanied by a person of the
individual’s choosing, or the record may
be released to the individual’s
representative who has written consent
of the individual, as described in
paragraph (e) of this section. A first
copy of any such record or information
will ordinarily be provided without
charge to the individual or
representative in a form comprehensible
to the individual. Fees for any other
copies of requested records shall be
assessed at the rate of 10 cents for each
sheet of duplication.
(d) An individual may request
amendment of a record pertaining to
such individual in a system of records
maintained by this Agency. A request
for amendment of a record must be in
writing and submitted during normal
business hours to the person designated
for that purpose and at the address set
forth in the published notice for the
system of records containing the record
of which amendment is sought. Copies
of such notices, and assistance in
preparing a request for amendment, may
be obtained from any Regional Office of
the Board or at the Board offices at 1099
14th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20570. The requester must provide
verification of identity as described in
paragraph (e) of this section, and the
request should set forth the specific
amendment requested and the reason
for the requested amendment. The
Agency shall acknowledge in writing
receipt of the request within 10 days of
receipt (excluding Saturdays, Sundays,
and legal public holidays) and,
wherever practicable, the
acknowledgment shall advise the
individual of the determination of the
request. If the review of the request for
amendment cannot be completed and a
determination made within 10 days, the
review shall be completed as soon as
possible, normally within 30 days
(Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public
holidays excluded) of receipt of the
request unless unusual circumstances
preclude completing the review within
that time, in which event the requester
will be notified in writing within that
30-day period of the reasons for the
delay and when the determination of
the request may be expected. If the
determination is to amend the record,
the requester shall be so notified in
writing and the record shall be amended
in accordance with that determination.
If any disclosures accountable under the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c) have been
made, all previous recipients of the
record which was amended shall be
advised of the amendment and its
substance. If it is determined that the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Dec 12, 2006
Jkt 211001
request should not be granted, the
requester shall be notified in writing of
that determination and of the reasons
therefor, and advised of the right to
obtain review of the adverse
determination under the provisions of
paragraph (f) of this section. The
provisions of this paragraph do not
apply to the extent that requested
information from the relevant system of
records has been exempted from this
Privacy Act requirement.
(e) Verification of the identification of
individuals required under paragraphs
(a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section to
assure that records are disclosed to the
proper person shall be required by the
Agency to an extent consistent with the
nature, location, and sensitivity of the
records being disclosed. Disclosure of a
record to an individual in person will
normally be made upon the presentation
of acceptable identification. Disclosure
of records by mail may be made on the
basis of the identifying information set
forth in the request. Depending on the
nature, location, and sensitivity of the
requested record, a signed notarized
statement verifying identity may be
required by the Agency. Proof of
authorization as representative to have
access to a record of an individual shall
be in writing, and a signed notarized
statement of such authorization may be
required by the Agency if the record
requested is of a sensitive nature.
(f)(1) Review may be obtained with
respect to:
(i) A refusal, under paragraph (a) or
(g) of this section, to inform an
individual if a system of records
contains a record concerning that
individual,
(ii) A refusal, under paragraph (b) or
(g) of this section, to grant access to a
record or an accounting of disclosure
from such a record, or
(iii) A refusal, under paragraph (d) of
this section, to amend a record.
(iv) The request for review should be
made to the Chairman of the Board if
the system of records is maintained in
the office of a Member of the Board, the
office of the Executive Secretary, the
office of the Solicitor, the Division of
Information, or the Division of
Administrative Law Judges. Consonant
with the provisions of section 3(d) of the
National Labor Relations Act, and the
delegation of authority from the Board
to the General Counsel, the request
should be made to the General Counsel
if the system of records is maintained by
an office of the Agency other than those
enumerated above. Either the Chairman
of the Board or the General Counsel may
designate in writing another officer of
the Agency to review the refusal of the
request. Such review shall be completed
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74883
within 30 days (excluding Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal public holidays)
from the receipt of the request for
review unless the Chairman of the
Board or the General Counsel, as the
case may be, for good cause shown,
shall extend such 30-day period.
(2) If, upon review of a refusal under
paragraph (a) or (g) of this section, the
reviewing officer determines that the
individual should be informed of
whether a system of records contains a
record pertaining to that individual,
such information shall be promptly
provided. If the reviewing officer
determines that the information was
properly denied, the individual shall be
so informed in writing with a brief
statement of the reasons therefor.
(3) If, upon review of a refusal under
paragraph (b) or (g) of this section, the
reviewing officer determines that access
to a record or to an accounting of
disclosures should be granted, the
requester shall be so notified and the
record or accounting shall be promptly
made available to the requester. If the
reviewing officer determines that the
request for access was properly denied,
the individual shall be so informed in
writing with a brief statement of the
reasons therefor, and of the right to
judicial review of that determination
under the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552a(g)(1)(B).
(4) If, upon review of a refusal under
paragraph (i) of this section, the
reviewing official grants a request to
amend, the requester shall be so
notified, the record shall be amended in
accordance with the determination, and,
if any disclosures accountable under the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c) have been
made, all previous recipients of the
record which was amended shall be
advised of the amendment and its
substance. If the reviewing officer
determines that the denial of a request
for amendment should be sustained, the
Agency shall advise the requester of the
determination and the reasons therefor,
and that the individual may file with
the Agency a concise statement of the
reason for disagreeing with the
determination, and may seek judicial
review of the Agency’s denial of the
request to amend the record. In the
event a statement of disagreement is
filed, that statement—
(i) will be made available to anyone
to whom the record is subsequently
disclosed together with, at the
discretion of the Agency, a brief
statement summarizing the Agency’s
reasons for declining to amend the
record, and
(ii) will be supplied, together with
any Agency statements, to any prior
recipients of the disputed record to the
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
74884
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
extent that an accounting of disclosure
was made.
(g) To the extent that portions of
system of records described in notices of
Governmentwide systems of records
published by the Office of Personnel
Management are identified by those
notices as being subject to the
management of an officer of this
Agency, or an officer of this Agency is
designated as the official to contact for
information, access, or contents of those
records, individual requests for access
to those records, requests for their
amendment, and review of denials of
requests for amendment shall be in
accordance with the provisions of 5 CFR
part 297, subpart A, § 297.101, et seq.,
as promulgated by the Office of
Personnel Management. To the extent
that portions of system of records
described in notices of Governmentwide
system of records published by the
Department of Labor are identified by
those notices as being subject to the
management of an officer of this
Agency, or an officer of this Agency is
designated as the official to contact for
information, access, or contents of those
records, individual requests for access
to those records, requests for their
amendment, and review of denials of
requests for amendment shall be in
accordance with the provisions of this
rule. Review of a refusal to inform an
individual whether such a system of
records contains a record pertaining to
that individual and review of a refusal
to grant an individual’s request for
access to a record in such a system may
be obtained in accordance with the
provisions of paragraph (f) of this
section.
(h) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the
system of records maintained by the
Office of the Inspector General of the
National Labor Relations Board that
contains Investigative Files shall be
exempted from the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552a, except subsections (b),
(c)(1) and (2), (e)(4)(A) through (F),
(e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and (i),
from 29 CFR 102.117(c) and (d), and
from 29 CFR 102.117a(a), (b), (c), (d), (e),
and (f), insofar as the system contains
investigatory material compiled for
criminal law enforcement purposes.
(i) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the
system of records maintained by the
Office of the Inspector General of the
National Labor Relations Board that
contains the Investigative Files shall be
exempted from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f), from
29 CFR 102.117 (c) and (d), and from 29
CFR 102.117a(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f),
insofar as the system contains
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes not within the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Dec 12, 2006
Jkt 211001
scope of the exemption at 29 CFR
102.117a(h).
(j) Privacy Act exemptions contained
in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this section
are justified for the following reasons:
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) requires an
agency to make the accounting of each
disclosure of records available to the
individual named in the record at his/
her request. These accountings must
state the date, nature, and purpose of
each disclosure of a record and the
name and address of the recipient.
Accounting for each disclosure would
alert the subjects of an investigation to
the existence of the investigation and
the fact that they are subjects of the
investigation. The release of such
information to the subjects of an
investigation would provide them with
significant information concerning the
nature of the investigation and could
seriously impede or compromise the
investigation, endanger the physical
safety of confidential sources, witnesses,
law enforcement personnel, and their
families and lead to the improper
influencing of witnesses, the destruction
of evidence, or the fabrication of
testimony.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(4) requires an
agency to inform any person or other
agency about any correction or notation
of dispute made by the agency in
accordance with subsection (d) of the
Act. Since this system of records is
being exempted from subsection (d) of
the Act, concerning access to records,
this section is inapplicable to the extent
that this system of records will be
exempted from subsection (d) of the
Act.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d) requires an
agency to permit an individual to gain
access to records pertaining to him/her,
to request amendment to such records,
to request a review of an agency
decision not to amend such records, and
to contest the information contained in
such records. Granting access to records
in this system of records could inform
the subject of an investigation of an
actual or potential criminal violation, of
the existence of that investigation, of the
nature and scope of the information and
evidence obtained as to his/her
activities, or of the identity of
confidential sources, witnesses, and law
enforcement personnel and could
provide information to enable the
subject to avoid detection or
apprehension. Granting access to such
information could seriously impede or
compromise an investigation, endanger
the physical safety of confidential
sources, witnesses, law enforcement
personnel, and their families, lead to the
improper influencing of witnesses, the
destruction of evidence, or the
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
fabrication of testimony, and disclose
investigative techniques and
procedures. In addition, granting access
to such information could disclose
classified, security-sensitive, or
confidential business information and
could constitute an unwarranted
invasion of the personal privacy of
others.
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) requires each
agency to maintain in its records only
such information about an individual as
is relevant and necessary to accomplish
a purpose of the agency required by
statute or by executive order of the
President. The application of this
provision could impair investigations
and law enforcement because it is not
always possible to detect the relevance
or necessity of specific information in
the early stages of an investigation.
Relevance and necessity are often
questions of judgment and timing, and
it is only after the information is
evaluated that the relevance and
necessity of such information can be
established. In addition, during the
course of the investigation, the
investigator may obtain information
which is incidental to the main purpose
of the investigative jurisdiction of
another agency. Such information
cannot readily be segregated.
Furthermore, during the course of the
investigation, the investigator may
obtain information concerning the
violation of laws other than those which
are within the scope of his/her
jurisdiction. In the interest of effective
law enforcement, OIG investigators
should retain this information, since it
can aid in establishing patterns of
criminal activity and can provide
valuable leads for other law
enforcement agencies.
(5) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(2) requires an
agency to collect information to the
greatest extent practicable directly from
the subject individual when the
information may result in adverse
determinations about an individual’s
rights, benefits, and privileges under
Federal programs. The application of
this provision could impair
investigations and law enforcement by
alerting the subject of an investigation,
thereby enabling the subject to avoid
detection or apprehension, to influence
witnesses improperly, to destroy
evidence, or to fabricate testimony.
Moreover, in certain circumstances the
subject of an investigation cannot be
required to provide information to
investigators and information must be
collected from other sources.
Furthermore, it is often necessary to
collect information from sources other
than the subject of the investigation to
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
verify the accuracy of the evidence
collected.
(6) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) requires an
agency to inform each person whom it
asks to supply information, on a form
that can be retained by the person, of
the authority under which the
information is sought and whether
disclosure is mandatory or voluntary; of
the principal purposes for which the
information is intended to be used; of
the routine uses which may be made of
the information; and of the effects on
the person, if any, of not providing all
or any part of the requested information.
The application of this provision could
provide the subject of an investigation
with substantial information about the
nature of that investigation that could
interfere with the investigation.
Moreover, providing such a notice to the
subject of an investigation could
seriously impede or compromise an
undercover investigation by revealing
its existence and could endanger the
physical safety of confidential sources,
witnesses, and investigators by
revealing their identities.
(7) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(G) and (H)
require an agency to publish a Federal
Register notice concerning its
procedures for notifying an individual,
at his/her request, if the system of
records contains a record pertaining to
him/her, how to gain access to such a
record and how to contest its content.
Since this system of records is being
exempted from subsection (f) of the Act,
concerning agency rules, and subsection
(d) of the Act, concerning access to
records, these requirements are
inapplicable to the extent that this
system of records will be exempt from
subsections (f) and (d) of the Act.
Although the system would be exempt
from these requirements, OIG has
published information concerning its
notification, access, and contest
procedures because, under certain
circumstances, OIG could decide it is
appropriate for an individual to have
access to all or a portion of his/her
records in this system of records.
(8) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I) requires an
agency to publish a Federal Register
notice concerning the categories of
sources of records in the system of
records. Exemption from this provision
is necessary to protect the
confidentiality of the sources of
information, to protect the privacy and
physical safety of confidential sources
and witnesses, and to avoid the
disclosure of investigative techniques
and procedures. Although the system
will be exempt from this requirement,
OIG has published such a notice in
broad generic terms.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Dec 12, 2006
Jkt 211001
(9) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(5) requires an
agency to maintain its records with such
accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and
completeness as is reasonably necessary
to assure fairness to the individual in
making any determination about the
individual. Since the Act defines
‘‘maintain’’ to include the collection of
information, complying with this
provision could prevent the collection
of any data not shown to be accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete at the
moment it is collected. In collecting
information for criminal law
enforcement purposes, it is not possible
to determine in advance what
information is accurate, relevant, timely,
and complete. Facts are first gathered
and then placed into a logical order to
prove or disprove objectively the
criminal behavior of an individual.
Material which seems unrelated,
irrelevant, or incomplete when collected
can take on added meaning or
significance as the investigation
progresses. The restrictions of this
provision could interfere with the
preparation of a complete investigative
report, thereby impeding effective law
enforcement.
(10) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(8) requires an
agency to make reasonable efforts to
serve notice on an individual when any
record on such individual is made
available to any person under
compulsory legal process when such
process becomes a matter of public
record. Complying with this provision
could prematurely reveal an ongoing
criminal investigation to the subject of
the investigation.
(11) 5 U.S.C. 552a(f)(1) requires an
agency to promulgate rules which shall
establish procedures whereby an
individual can be notified in response to
his/her request if any system of records
named by the individual contains a
record pertaining to him/her. The
application of this provision could
impede or compromise an investigation
or prosecution if the subject of an
investigation were able to use such rules
to learn of the existence of an
investigation before it could be
completed. In addition, mere notice of
the fact of an investigation could inform
the subject and others that their
activities are under or may become the
subject of an investigation and could
enable the subjects to avoid detection or
apprehension, to influence witnesses
improperly, to destroy evidence, or to
fabricate testimony. Since this system
would be exempt from subsection (d) of
the Act, concerning access to records,
the requirements of subsection (f)(2)
through (5) of the Act, concerning
agency rules for obtaining access to such
records, are inapplicable to the extent
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
74885
that this system of records will be
exempted from subsection (d) of the
Act. Although this system would be
exempt from the requirements of
subsection (f) of the Act, OIG has
promulgated rules which establish
agency procedures because, under
certain circumstances, it could be
appropriate for an individual to have
access to all or a portion of his/her
records in this system of records.
(12) 5 U.S.C. 552a(g) provides for civil
remedies if an agency fails to comply
with the requirements concerning
access to records under subsections
(d)(1) and (3) of the Act; maintenance of
records under subsection (e)(5) of the
Act; and any other provision of the Act,
or any rule promulgated thereunder, in
such a way as to have an adverse effect
on an individual. Since this system of
records would be exempt from
subsections (c)(3) and (4), (d), (e)(1), (2),
and (3) and (4)(G) through (I), (e)(5), and
(8), and (f) of the Act, the provisions of
subsection (g) of the Act would be
inapplicable to the extent that this
system of records will be exempted from
those subsections of the Act.
(k) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the
system of records maintained by the
NLRB containing Agency Disciplinary
Case Files (Nonemployees) shall be
exempted from the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552a (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(H), and (I), and (f) insofar as the system
contains investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes
other than material within the scope of
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2).
(l) The Privacy Act exemption set
forth in paragraph (k) of this section is
claimed on the ground that the
requirements of subsections (c)(3), (d),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f) of
the Privacy Act, if applied to Agency
Disciplinary Case Files, would seriously
impair the ability of the NLRB to
conduct investigations of alleged or
suspected violations of the NLRB’s
misconduct rules, as set forth in
paragraphs (j) (1), (3), (4), (7), (8), and
(11) of this section.
(m) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2),
the following three proposed systems of
records shall be exempted in their
entirety from the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I), and (f), because the systems
contain investigatory material compiled
for law enforcement purposes, other
than material within the scope of nl;5
U.S.C. 552a(j)(2): Case Activity Tracking
System (CATS) and Associated Regional
Office Files (NLRB–25), Regional
Advice and Injunction Litigation System
(RAILS) and Associated Headquarters
Files (NLRB–28), and Appeals Case
Tracking System (ACTS) and Associated
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
74886
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 239 / Wednesday, December 13, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Headquarters Files (NLRB–30). Pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), limited categories
of information from the following four
proposed systems of records shall be
exempted from the provisions of nl;5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f), insofar as the
systems contain investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes,
other than material within the scope of
5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2):
(1) the Judicial Case Management
Systems—Pending Case List (JCMS–
PCL) and Associated Headquarters Files
(NLRB–21)—information relating to
requests to file injunctions under 29
U.S.C. 160(j), requests to initiate federal
court contempt proceedings, certain
requests that the Board initiate litigation
or intervene in non-Agency litigation,
and any other investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes;
(2) the Solicitor’s System (SOL) and
Associated Headquarters Files (NLRB–
23)—information relating to requests to
file injunctions under 29 U.S.C. 160(j),
requests to initiate federal court
contempt proceedings, certain requests
that the Board initiate litigation or
intervene in non-Agency litigation, and
any other investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes;
(3) The Special Litigation Case
Tracking System (SPLIT) and
Associated Headquarters Files (NLRB–
27)—information relating to
investigative subpoena enforcement
cases, injunction and mandamus actions
regarding Agency cases under
investigation, bankruptcy case
information in matters under
investigation, Freedom of Information
Act cases involving investigatory
records, certain requests that the Board
initiate litigation or intervene in nonAgency litigation, and any other
investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes; and
(4) The Freedom of Information Act
Tracking System (FTS) and Associated
Agency Files (NLRB–32)—information
requested under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, that
relates to the Agency’s investigation of
unfair labor practice and representation
cases or other proceedings described in
paragraphs (m)(1) through (3) of this
section.
(n) The reasons for exemption under
5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) are as follows:
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) requires an
agency to make the accounting of each
disclosure of records available to the
individual named in the record at such
individual’s request. These accountings
must state the date, nature, and purpose
of each disclosure of a record, and the
name and address of the recipient.
Providing such an accounting of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:44 Dec 12, 2006
Jkt 211001
investigatory information to a party in
an unfair labor practice or
representation matter under
investigation could inform that
individual of the precise scope of an
Agency investigation, or the existence or
scope of another law enforcement
investigation. Accordingly, this Privacy
Act requirement could seriously impede
or compromise either the Agency’s
investigation, or another law
enforcement investigation, by causing
the improper influencing of witnesses,
retaliation against witnesses,
destruction of evidence, or fabrication of
testimony.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d) requires an
agency to permit an individual to gain
access to records pertaining to such
individual, to request amendment to
such records, to request review of an
agency decision not to amend such
records, and, where the Agency refuses
to amend records, to submit a statement
of disagreement to be included with the
records. Such disclosure of investigatory
information could seriously impede or
compromise the Agency’s investigation
by revealing the identity of confidential
sources or confidential business
information, or causing the improper
influencing of witnesses, retaliation
against witnesses, destruction of
evidence, fabrication of testimony, or
unwarranted invasion of the privacy of
others. Amendment of the records could
interfere with ongoing law enforcement
proceedings and impose an undue
administrative burden by requiring
investigations to be continuously
reinvestigated.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) requires an
agency to maintain in its records only
such information about an individual as
is relevant and necessary to accomplish
a purpose of the agency required by
statute or by executive order of the
President. This requirement could
foreclose investigators from acquiring or
receiving information the relevance and
necessity of which is not readily
apparent and could only be ascertained
after a complete review and evaluation
of all the evidence.
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(G) and (H)
require an agency to publish a Federal
Register notice concerning its
procedures for notifying an individual,
at the individual’s request, if the system
of records contains a record pertaining
to the individual, for gaining access to
such a record, and for contesting its
content. Because certain information
from these systems of records is exempt
from subsection (d) of the Act
concerning access to records, and
consequently, from subsection (f) of the
Act concerning Agency rules governing
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
access, these requirements are
inapplicable to that information.
(5) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I) requires an
agency to publish a Federal Register
notice concerning the categories of
sources of records in the system of
records. Exemption from this provision
is necessary to protect the
confidentiality of sources of
information, to protect against the
disclosure of investigative techniques
and procedures, to avoid threats or
reprisals against informers by subjects of
investigations, and to protect against
informers refusing to give full
information to investigators for fear of
having their identities as sources
revealed.
(6) 5 U.S.C. 552a(f) requires an agency
to promulgate rules for notifying
individuals of Privacy Act rights granted
by subsection (d) of the Act concerning
access and amendment of records.
Because certain information from these
systems is exempt from subsection (d) of
the Act, the requirements of subsection
(f) of the Act are inapplicable to that
information.
Dated: Washington, DC, November 15,
2006.
By direction of the Board.
Lester A. Heltzer,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06–9682 Filed 12–12–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7545–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 69
[Docket No. EPA–R02–OAR–2005–VI–0001,
FRL–8254–6]
Clean Air Act Section 325 Exemption
for Virgin Islands Water and Power
Authority
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed Grant of Petition
under section 325 of the Clean Air Act.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency is proposing to grant, with
conditions, a Petition, from the
Governor of the Virgin Islands,
submitted under section 325 of the
Clean Air Act (CAA). The Petition
requests that EPA exempt the Virgin
Islands Water and Power Authority
(VIWAPA) from its obligation to comply
with the continuous emission
monitoring system (CEMS) conditions
contained in Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) permits issued
pursuant to section 165 of the CAA to
VIWAPA for nine PSD permitted units
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 239 (Wednesday, December 13, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 74881-74886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9682]
[[Page 74881]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
29 CFR Part 102
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: National Labor Relations Board.
ACTION: Proposed rule exempting three systems of records and portions
of four other systems of records from certain provisions of the Privacy
Act, and amending Agency's existing Privacy Act regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) proposes to exempt
three systems of records and portions of four other systems of records
from certain provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a,
pursuant to Section (k)(2) of that Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), and to
amend existing Privacy Act regulations for clarity.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received on or before
January 22, 2007.
ADDRESSES: All persons who desire to submit written comments for
consideration by the Agency regarding the proposed rule shall mail them
to the Agency's Privacy Officer, National Labor Relations Board, Room
7608, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20570-0001, or submit them
electronically to PrivacyActComments@nlrb.gov. Comments may also be
submitted electronically through https://www.regulations.gov, which
contains a copy of this proposed rule.
Copies of all such communications will be available for examination
during normal business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through
Friday, excluding Federal holidays) in the Agency's Reading Room,
located in the Case Records Unit, National Labor Relations Board, Room
9201, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20570-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tommie Gregg, Sr., Privacy Act
Officer, National Labor Relations Board, Room 7608, 1099 14th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20570-0001, (202) 273-2833, Tommie.Gregg@nlrb.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Elsewhere in today's issue of the Federal
Register, the Agency is proposing twelve systems of records under the
Privacy Act of 1974, nine of which consist of an electronic case
tracking system and associated paper or electronic files, and the
remaining three systems consist of electronic case tracking systems
only.
The Agency intends to change the section number of its Privacy Act
regulations, currently designated as Section 102.117(f)-(q) of Part
102, 29 CFR Subpart K, immediately following the Agency's Freedom of
Information Act regulations, by creating a new section for the Privacy
Act regulations, in order to more clearly separate them from the
Freedom of Information Act regulations. Under this change, the Agency's
Privacy Act regulations will continue to immediately follow the Freedom
of Information Act regulations at Section 102.117(a)-(e), but will be
newly designated as Section 102.117a, paragraphs (a) through (n), of
Part 102, 29 CFR Subpart K.
The Agency also intends to amend its Privacy Act regulations
providing for notice, access, and amendment of Privacy Act records,
Section 102.117a(a), (b), and (d) (as newly designated), 29 CFR
102.117a(a), (b), and (d), in order to clarify that these provisions
apply only to the extent that requested information from the Privacy
Act system of records at issue has not been exempted from such Privacy
Act provisions.
Pursuant to subsection (k)(2) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(2)), and for the reasons set forth below, the Board proposes to
include within the new Section 102.117a, two additional paragraphs (m)
and (n) exempting three systems of records (the Case Activity Tracking
System (CATS) and Associated Regional Office Files (NLRB-25), the
Regional Advice and Injunction Litigation System (RAILS) and Associated
Headquarters Files (NLRB-28), and the Appeals Case Tracking System
(ACTS) and Associated Headquarters Files (NLRB-30)), and portions of
four other systems of records (the Judicial Case Management System--
Pending Case List (JCMS-PCL) and Associated Headquarters Files (NLRB-
21), the Solicitor's System (SOL) and Associated Headquarters Files
(NLRB-23), the Special Litigation Branch Case Tracking System (SPLIT)
and Associated Headquarters Files (NLRB-27), and the Freedom of
Information Act Tracking System (FTS) and Associated Agency Files
(NLRB-32)) from subsections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I), and (f) of the Privacy Act.
Subsection (k)(2) of the Privacy Act authorizes the head of an
agency to exempt a system of records from subsections (c)(3), (d),
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f) of the Privacy Act (5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (f))
if the system of records is investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes other than material within the scope of subsection
(j)(2) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2)). As indicated in the
Agency's notice proposing the systems of records, all or portions of
seven of the proposed systems contain information compiled by the
Agency in the course of carrying out its law enforcement
responsibilities in conducting unfair labor practice and representation
investigations. (All references in this proposed rule to the Agency's
``unfair labor practice cases'' include the portion of such cases known
as ``compliance,'' which is the effectuation of remedial provisions of
a settlement agreement, Board order, or court judgment enforcing a
Board order (see NLRB Casehandling Manual, Part Three--Compliance
Proceedings, Sec. 10500.1).) This information meets the criteria of
subsection (k)(2).
The requirements of subsections (c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f) of the Privacy Act, if applied to the
seven proposed systems of records, would seriously impair the ability
of the Agency to conduct investigations of alleged unfair labor
practice violations and representation issues. The disclosure
requirements as set forth in the provisions for notice, access,
amendment, review, and accountings, could enable subject individuals to
take action to avoid detection of improper activities, including but
not limited to concealing or destroying evidence, and intimidating
sources and witnesses, or otherwise to interfere with the
investigation. In addition, the requirement that information maintained
in the system be limited to that which is relevant and necessary could
foreclose investigators from acquiring or receiving information the
relevance and necessity of which is not readily apparent and could only
be ascertained after a complete review and evaluation of all the
evidence.
The requirements of these subsections are largely unnecessary given
the notice and procedural protections afforded by the Agency's
administrative proceedings. These protections (i.e., notice and, in
appropriate cases, opportunity for hearing), assure that subject
individuals will have the opportunity to learn of the existence of, and
to challenge, those records that the Agency uses in administrative
proceedings, and in any subsequent judicial proceeding.
This proposed rule relates to individuals rather than small
business entities. Accordingly, pursuant to the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, this rule will not have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small business entities.
[[Page 74882]]
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), the Agency has determined that this proposed rule would
not impose new recordkeeping, application, reporting, or other types of
information collection requirements on the public.
The proposed rule will not have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this proposed
rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
In accordance with Executive Order 12866, it has been determined
that this proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action,'' and
therefore does not require a Regulatory Impact Analysis.
List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 102
Privacy, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements.
For the reasons stated in the Supplementary Information section,
Part 102 of title 29, ch. I of the Code of Federal Regulations, is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 102--RULES AND REGULATIONS, SERIES 8
Subpart K--Records and Information
1. The authority citation for part 102 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Sections 1, 6, National Labor Relations Act (29
U.S.C. 151, 156). Section 102.117 also issued under section
552(a)(4)(A) of the Freedom of Information Act, as amended (5 U.S.C.
552(a)(4)(A)), and Section 102.117a also issued under section
552a(j) and (k) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a (j) and
(k)). Sections 102.143 through 102.155 also issued under section
504(c)(1) of the Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended (5 U.S.C.
504(c)(1)).
2. Section 102.117 of subpart K is amended by:
a. Removing paragraphs (f) through (q);
b. In part 102, revise all references to paragraphs 102.117(f)
through (q) to read paragraphs 102.117a (a) through (l).
c. The heading of Sec. 102.117 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 102.117 Freedom of Information Act Regulations: Board materials
and formal documents available for public inspection and copying;
requests for described records; time limit for response; appeal from
denial of request; fees for document search and duplication; files and
records not subject to inspection.
3. Section 102.117a is added to read as follows:
Sec. 102.117a Privacy Act Regulations: notification as to whether a
system of records contains records pertaining to requesting
individuals; requests for access to records, amendment of such records,
or accounting of disclosures; time limits for response; appeal from
denial of requests; fees for document duplication; files and records
exempted from certain Privacy Act requirements.
(a) An individual will be informed whether a system of records
maintained by this Agency contains a record pertaining to such
individual. An inquiry should be made in writing or in person during
normal business hours to the official of this Agency designated for
that purpose and at the address set forth in a notice of a system of
records published by this Agency, in a Notice of Systems of
Governmentwide Personnel Records published by the Office of Personnel
Management, or in a Notice of Governmentwide Systems of Records
published by the Department of Labor. Copies of such notices, and
assistance in preparing an inquiry, may be obtained from any Regional
Office of the Board or at the Board offices at 1099 14th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20570. The inquiry should contain sufficient
information, as defined in the notice, to identify the record.
Reasonable verification of the identity of the inquirer, as described
in paragraph (e) of this section, will be required to assure that
information is disclosed to the proper person. The Agency shall
acknowledge the inquiry in writing within 10 days (excluding Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal public holidays) and, wherever practicable, the
acknowledgment shall supply the information requested. If, for good
cause shown, the Agency cannot supply the information within 10 days,
the inquirer shall within that time period be notified in writing of
the reasons therefor and when it is anticipated the information will be
supplied. An acknowledgment will not be provided when the information
is supplied within the 10-day period. If the Agency refuses to inform
an individual whether a system of records contains a record pertaining
to an individual, the inquirer shall be notified in writing of that
determination and the reasons therefor, and of the right to obtain
review of that determination under the provisions of paragraph (f) of
this section. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to the
extent that requested information from the relevant system of records
has been exempted from this Privacy Act requirement.
(b) An individual will be permitted access to records pertaining to
such individual contained in any system of records described in the
notice of system of records published by this Agency, or access to the
accounting of disclosures from such records. The request for access
must be made in writing or in person during normal business hours to
the person designated for that purpose and at the address set forth in
the published notice of system of records. The request for access must
be made in writing or in person during normal business hours to the
person designated for that purpose and at the address set forth in the
published notice of system of records. Copies of such notices, and
assistance in preparing a request for access, may be obtained from any
Regional Office of the Board or at the Board offices at 1099 14th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20570. Reasonable verification of the
identity of the requester, as described in paragraph (e) of this
section, shall be required to assure that records are disclosed to the
proper person. A request for access to records or the accounting of
disclosures from such records shall be acknowledged in writing by the
Agency within 10 days of receipt (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and
legal public holidays) and, wherever practicable, the acknowledgment
shall inform the requester whether access will be granted and, if so,
the time and location at which the records or accounting will be made
available. If access to the record or accounting is to be granted, the
record or accounting will normally be provided within 30 days
(excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) of the
request, unless for good cause shown the Agency is unable to do so, in
which case the individual will be informed in writing within that 30-
day period of the reasons therefor and when it is anticipated that
access will be granted. An acknowledgment of a request will not be
provided if the record is made available within the 10-day period. If
an individual's request for access to a record or an accounting of
disclosure from such a record under the provisions of this paragraph is
denied, the notice informing the individual of the denial shall set
forth the reasons therefor and advise the individual of the right to
obtain a review of that determination under the provisions of paragraph
(f) of this section. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to
the extent that requested information from the relevant system of
records has been exempted from this Privacy Act requirement.
(c) An individual granted access to records pertaining to such
individual contained in a system of records may review all such
records. For that
[[Page 74883]]
purpose the individual may be accompanied by a person of the
individual's choosing, or the record may be released to the
individual's representative who has written consent of the individual,
as described in paragraph (e) of this section. A first copy of any such
record or information will ordinarily be provided without charge to the
individual or representative in a form comprehensible to the
individual. Fees for any other copies of requested records shall be
assessed at the rate of 10 cents for each sheet of duplication.
(d) An individual may request amendment of a record pertaining to
such individual in a system of records maintained by this Agency. A
request for amendment of a record must be in writing and submitted
during normal business hours to the person designated for that purpose
and at the address set forth in the published notice for the system of
records containing the record of which amendment is sought. Copies of
such notices, and assistance in preparing a request for amendment, may
be obtained from any Regional Office of the Board or at the Board
offices at 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20570. The requester
must provide verification of identity as described in paragraph (e) of
this section, and the request should set forth the specific amendment
requested and the reason for the requested amendment. The Agency shall
acknowledge in writing receipt of the request within 10 days of receipt
(excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays) and, wherever
practicable, the acknowledgment shall advise the individual of the
determination of the request. If the review of the request for
amendment cannot be completed and a determination made within 10 days,
the review shall be completed as soon as possible, normally within 30
days (Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays excluded) of
receipt of the request unless unusual circumstances preclude completing
the review within that time, in which event the requester will be
notified in writing within that 30-day period of the reasons for the
delay and when the determination of the request may be expected. If the
determination is to amend the record, the requester shall be so
notified in writing and the record shall be amended in accordance with
that determination. If any disclosures accountable under the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c) have been made, all previous recipients of the
record which was amended shall be advised of the amendment and its
substance. If it is determined that the request should not be granted,
the requester shall be notified in writing of that determination and of
the reasons therefor, and advised of the right to obtain review of the
adverse determination under the provisions of paragraph (f) of this
section. The provisions of this paragraph do not apply to the extent
that requested information from the relevant system of records has been
exempted from this Privacy Act requirement.
(e) Verification of the identification of individuals required
under paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section to assure that
records are disclosed to the proper person shall be required by the
Agency to an extent consistent with the nature, location, and
sensitivity of the records being disclosed. Disclosure of a record to
an individual in person will normally be made upon the presentation of
acceptable identification. Disclosure of records by mail may be made on
the basis of the identifying information set forth in the request.
Depending on the nature, location, and sensitivity of the requested
record, a signed notarized statement verifying identity may be required
by the Agency. Proof of authorization as representative to have access
to a record of an individual shall be in writing, and a signed
notarized statement of such authorization may be required by the Agency
if the record requested is of a sensitive nature.
(f)(1) Review may be obtained with respect to:
(i) A refusal, under paragraph (a) or (g) of this section, to
inform an individual if a system of records contains a record
concerning that individual,
(ii) A refusal, under paragraph (b) or (g) of this section, to
grant access to a record or an accounting of disclosure from such a
record, or
(iii) A refusal, under paragraph (d) of this section, to amend a
record.
(iv) The request for review should be made to the Chairman of the
Board if the system of records is maintained in the office of a Member
of the Board, the office of the Executive Secretary, the office of the
Solicitor, the Division of Information, or the Division of
Administrative Law Judges. Consonant with the provisions of section
3(d) of the National Labor Relations Act, and the delegation of
authority from the Board to the General Counsel, the request should be
made to the General Counsel if the system of records is maintained by
an office of the Agency other than those enumerated above. Either the
Chairman of the Board or the General Counsel may designate in writing
another officer of the Agency to review the refusal of the request.
Such review shall be completed within 30 days (excluding Saturdays,
Sundays, and legal public holidays) from the receipt of the request for
review unless the Chairman of the Board or the General Counsel, as the
case may be, for good cause shown, shall extend such 30-day period.
(2) If, upon review of a refusal under paragraph (a) or (g) of this
section, the reviewing officer determines that the individual should be
informed of whether a system of records contains a record pertaining to
that individual, such information shall be promptly provided. If the
reviewing officer determines that the information was properly denied,
the individual shall be so informed in writing with a brief statement
of the reasons therefor.
(3) If, upon review of a refusal under paragraph (b) or (g) of this
section, the reviewing officer determines that access to a record or to
an accounting of disclosures should be granted, the requester shall be
so notified and the record or accounting shall be promptly made
available to the requester. If the reviewing officer determines that
the request for access was properly denied, the individual shall be so
informed in writing with a brief statement of the reasons therefor, and
of the right to judicial review of that determination under the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1)(B).
(4) If, upon review of a refusal under paragraph (i) of this
section, the reviewing official grants a request to amend, the
requester shall be so notified, the record shall be amended in
accordance with the determination, and, if any disclosures accountable
under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c) have been made, all previous
recipients of the record which was amended shall be advised of the
amendment and its substance. If the reviewing officer determines that
the denial of a request for amendment should be sustained, the Agency
shall advise the requester of the determination and the reasons
therefor, and that the individual may file with the Agency a concise
statement of the reason for disagreeing with the determination, and may
seek judicial review of the Agency's denial of the request to amend the
record. In the event a statement of disagreement is filed, that
statement--
(i) will be made available to anyone to whom the record is
subsequently disclosed together with, at the discretion of the Agency,
a brief statement summarizing the Agency's reasons for declining to
amend the record, and
(ii) will be supplied, together with any Agency statements, to any
prior recipients of the disputed record to the
[[Page 74884]]
extent that an accounting of disclosure was made.
(g) To the extent that portions of system of records described in
notices of Governmentwide systems of records published by the Office of
Personnel Management are identified by those notices as being subject
to the management of an officer of this Agency, or an officer of this
Agency is designated as the official to contact for information,
access, or contents of those records, individual requests for access to
those records, requests for their amendment, and review of denials of
requests for amendment shall be in accordance with the provisions of 5
CFR part 297, subpart A, Sec. 297.101, et seq., as promulgated by the
Office of Personnel Management. To the extent that portions of system
of records described in notices of Governmentwide system of records
published by the Department of Labor are identified by those notices as
being subject to the management of an officer of this Agency, or an
officer of this Agency is designated as the official to contact for
information, access, or contents of those records, individual requests
for access to those records, requests for their amendment, and review
of denials of requests for amendment shall be in accordance with the
provisions of this rule. Review of a refusal to inform an individual
whether such a system of records contains a record pertaining to that
individual and review of a refusal to grant an individual's request for
access to a record in such a system may be obtained in accordance with
the provisions of paragraph (f) of this section.
(h) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), the system of records
maintained by the Office of the Inspector General of the National Labor
Relations Board that contains Investigative Files shall be exempted
from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a, except subsections (b), (c)(1)
and (2), (e)(4)(A) through (F), (e)(6), (7), (9), (10), and (11), and
(i), from 29 CFR 102.117(c) and (d), and from 29 CFR 102.117a(a), (b),
(c), (d), (e), and (f), insofar as the system contains investigatory
material compiled for criminal law enforcement purposes.
(i) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the system of records
maintained by the Office of the Inspector General of the National Labor
Relations Board that contains the Investigative Files shall be exempted
from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and
(f), from 29 CFR 102.117 (c) and (d), and from 29 CFR 102.117a(a), (b),
(c), (d), (e), and (f), insofar as the system contains investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement purposes not within the scope of
the exemption at 29 CFR 102.117a(h).
(j) Privacy Act exemptions contained in paragraphs (h) and (i) of
this section are justified for the following reasons:
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) requires an agency to make the accounting
of each disclosure of records available to the individual named in the
record at his/her request. These accountings must state the date,
nature, and purpose of each disclosure of a record and the name and
address of the recipient. Accounting for each disclosure would alert
the subjects of an investigation to the existence of the investigation
and the fact that they are subjects of the investigation. The release
of such information to the subjects of an investigation would provide
them with significant information concerning the nature of the
investigation and could seriously impede or compromise the
investigation, endanger the physical safety of confidential sources,
witnesses, law enforcement personnel, and their families and lead to
the improper influencing of witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or
the fabrication of testimony.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(4) requires an agency to inform any person or
other agency about any correction or notation of dispute made by the
agency in accordance with subsection (d) of the Act. Since this system
of records is being exempted from subsection (d) of the Act, concerning
access to records, this section is inapplicable to the extent that this
system of records will be exempted from subsection (d) of the Act.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d) requires an agency to permit an individual to
gain access to records pertaining to him/her, to request amendment to
such records, to request a review of an agency decision not to amend
such records, and to contest the information contained in such records.
Granting access to records in this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal
violation, of the existence of that investigation, of the nature and
scope of the information and evidence obtained as to his/her
activities, or of the identity of confidential sources, witnesses, and
law enforcement personnel and could provide information to enable the
subject to avoid detection or apprehension. Granting access to such
information could seriously impede or compromise an investigation,
endanger the physical safety of confidential sources, witnesses, law
enforcement personnel, and their families, lead to the improper
influencing of witnesses, the destruction of evidence, or the
fabrication of testimony, and disclose investigative techniques and
procedures. In addition, granting access to such information could
disclose classified, security-sensitive, or confidential business
information and could constitute an unwarranted invasion of the
personal privacy of others.
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) requires each agency to maintain in its
records only such information about an individual as is relevant and
necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required by statute or
by executive order of the President. The application of this provision
could impair investigations and law enforcement because it is not
always possible to detect the relevance or necessity of specific
information in the early stages of an investigation. Relevance and
necessity are often questions of judgment and timing, and it is only
after the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of
such information can be established. In addition, during the course of
the investigation, the investigator may obtain information which is
incidental to the main purpose of the investigative jurisdiction of
another agency. Such information cannot readily be segregated.
Furthermore, during the course of the investigation, the investigator
may obtain information concerning the violation of laws other than
those which are within the scope of his/her jurisdiction. In the
interest of effective law enforcement, OIG investigators should retain
this information, since it can aid in establishing patterns of criminal
activity and can provide valuable leads for other law enforcement
agencies.
(5) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(2) requires an agency to collect information
to the greatest extent practicable directly from the subject individual
when the information may result in adverse determinations about an
individual's rights, benefits, and privileges under Federal programs.
The application of this provision could impair investigations and law
enforcement by alerting the subject of an investigation, thereby
enabling the subject to avoid detection or apprehension, to influence
witnesses improperly, to destroy evidence, or to fabricate testimony.
Moreover, in certain circumstances the subject of an investigation
cannot be required to provide information to investigators and
information must be collected from other sources. Furthermore, it is
often necessary to collect information from sources other than the
subject of the investigation to
[[Page 74885]]
verify the accuracy of the evidence collected.
(6) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(3) requires an agency to inform each person
whom it asks to supply information, on a form that can be retained by
the person, of the authority under which the information is sought and
whether disclosure is mandatory or voluntary; of the principal purposes
for which the information is intended to be used; of the routine uses
which may be made of the information; and of the effects on the person,
if any, of not providing all or any part of the requested information.
The application of this provision could provide the subject of an
investigation with substantial information about the nature of that
investigation that could interfere with the investigation. Moreover,
providing such a notice to the subject of an investigation could
seriously impede or compromise an undercover investigation by revealing
its existence and could endanger the physical safety of confidential
sources, witnesses, and investigators by revealing their identities.
(7) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(G) and (H) require an agency to publish a
Federal Register notice concerning its procedures for notifying an
individual, at his/her request, if the system of records contains a
record pertaining to him/her, how to gain access to such a record and
how to contest its content. Since this system of records is being
exempted from subsection (f) of the Act, concerning agency rules, and
subsection (d) of the Act, concerning access to records, these
requirements are inapplicable to the extent that this system of records
will be exempt from subsections (f) and (d) of the Act. Although the
system would be exempt from these requirements, OIG has published
information concerning its notification, access, and contest procedures
because, under certain circumstances, OIG could decide it is
appropriate for an individual to have access to all or a portion of
his/her records in this system of records.
(8) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I) requires an agency to publish a Federal
Register notice concerning the categories of sources of records in the
system of records. Exemption from this provision is necessary to
protect the confidentiality of the sources of information, to protect
the privacy and physical safety of confidential sources and witnesses,
and to avoid the disclosure of investigative techniques and procedures.
Although the system will be exempt from this requirement, OIG has
published such a notice in broad generic terms.
(9) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(5) requires an agency to maintain its records
with such accuracy, relevance, timeliness, and completeness as is
reasonably necessary to assure fairness to the individual in making any
determination about the individual. Since the Act defines ``maintain''
to include the collection of information, complying with this provision
could prevent the collection of any data not shown to be accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete at the moment it is collected. In
collecting information for criminal law enforcement purposes, it is not
possible to determine in advance what information is accurate,
relevant, timely, and complete. Facts are first gathered and then
placed into a logical order to prove or disprove objectively the
criminal behavior of an individual. Material which seems unrelated,
irrelevant, or incomplete when collected can take on added meaning or
significance as the investigation progresses. The restrictions of this
provision could interfere with the preparation of a complete
investigative report, thereby impeding effective law enforcement.
(10) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(8) requires an agency to make reasonable
efforts to serve notice on an individual when any record on such
individual is made available to any person under compulsory legal
process when such process becomes a matter of public record. Complying
with this provision could prematurely reveal an ongoing criminal
investigation to the subject of the investigation.
(11) 5 U.S.C. 552a(f)(1) requires an agency to promulgate rules
which shall establish procedures whereby an individual can be notified
in response to his/her request if any system of records named by the
individual contains a record pertaining to him/her. The application of
this provision could impede or compromise an investigation or
prosecution if the subject of an investigation were able to use such
rules to learn of the existence of an investigation before it could be
completed. In addition, mere notice of the fact of an investigation
could inform the subject and others that their activities are under or
may become the subject of an investigation and could enable the
subjects to avoid detection or apprehension, to influence witnesses
improperly, to destroy evidence, or to fabricate testimony. Since this
system would be exempt from subsection (d) of the Act, concerning
access to records, the requirements of subsection (f)(2) through (5) of
the Act, concerning agency rules for obtaining access to such records,
are inapplicable to the extent that this system of records will be
exempted from subsection (d) of the Act. Although this system would be
exempt from the requirements of subsection (f) of the Act, OIG has
promulgated rules which establish agency procedures because, under
certain circumstances, it could be appropriate for an individual to
have access to all or a portion of his/her records in this system of
records.
(12) 5 U.S.C. 552a(g) provides for civil remedies if an agency
fails to comply with the requirements concerning access to records
under subsections (d)(1) and (3) of the Act; maintenance of records
under subsection (e)(5) of the Act; and any other provision of the Act,
or any rule promulgated thereunder, in such a way as to have an adverse
effect on an individual. Since this system of records would be exempt
from subsections (c)(3) and (4), (d), (e)(1), (2), and (3) and (4)(G)
through (I), (e)(5), and (8), and (f) of the Act, the provisions of
subsection (g) of the Act would be inapplicable to the extent that this
system of records will be exempted from those subsections of the Act.
(k) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the system of records
maintained by the NLRB containing Agency Disciplinary Case Files
(Nonemployees) shall be exempted from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a
(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f) insofar as the
system contains investigatory material compiled for law enforcement
purposes other than material within the scope of 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2).
(l) The Privacy Act exemption set forth in paragraph (k) of this
section is claimed on the ground that the requirements of subsections
(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I), and (f) of the Privacy
Act, if applied to Agency Disciplinary Case Files, would seriously
impair the ability of the NLRB to conduct investigations of alleged or
suspected violations of the NLRB's misconduct rules, as set forth in
paragraphs (j) (1), (3), (4), (7), (8), and (11) of this section.
(m) Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), the following three proposed
systems of records shall be exempted in their entirety from the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H),
(e)(4)(I), and (f), because the systems contain investigatory material
compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than material within the
scope of nl;5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2): Case Activity Tracking System (CATS)
and Associated Regional Office Files (NLRB-25), Regional Advice and
Injunction Litigation System (RAILS) and Associated Headquarters Files
(NLRB-28), and Appeals Case Tracking System (ACTS) and Associated
[[Page 74886]]
Headquarters Files (NLRB-30). Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2), limited
categories of information from the following four proposed systems of
records shall be exempted from the provisions of nl;5 U.S.C.
552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f),
insofar as the systems contain investigatory material compiled for law
enforcement purposes, other than material within the scope of 5 U.S.C.
552a(j)(2):
(1) the Judicial Case Management Systems--Pending Case List (JCMS-
PCL) and Associated Headquarters Files (NLRB-21)--information relating
to requests to file injunctions under 29 U.S.C. 160(j), requests to
initiate federal court contempt proceedings, certain requests that the
Board initiate litigation or intervene in non-Agency litigation, and
any other investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes;
(2) the Solicitor's System (SOL) and Associated Headquarters Files
(NLRB-23)--information relating to requests to file injunctions under
29 U.S.C. 160(j), requests to initiate federal court contempt
proceedings, certain requests that the Board initiate litigation or
intervene in non-Agency litigation, and any other investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement purposes;
(3) The Special Litigation Case Tracking System (SPLIT) and
Associated Headquarters Files (NLRB-27)--information relating to
investigative subpoena enforcement cases, injunction and mandamus
actions regarding Agency cases under investigation, bankruptcy case
information in matters under investigation, Freedom of Information Act
cases involving investigatory records, certain requests that the Board
initiate litigation or intervene in non-Agency litigation, and any
other investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes; and
(4) The Freedom of Information Act Tracking System (FTS) and
Associated Agency Files (NLRB-32)--information requested under the
Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, that relates to the Agency's
investigation of unfair labor practice and representation cases or
other proceedings described in paragraphs (m)(1) through (3) of this
section.
(n) The reasons for exemption under 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) are as
follows:
(1) 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3) requires an agency to make the accounting
of each disclosure of records available to the individual named in the
record at such individual's request. These accountings must state the
date, nature, and purpose of each disclosure of a record, and the name
and address of the recipient. Providing such an accounting of
investigatory information to a party in an unfair labor practice or
representation matter under investigation could inform that individual
of the precise scope of an Agency investigation, or the existence or
scope of another law enforcement investigation. Accordingly, this
Privacy Act requirement could seriously impede or compromise either the
Agency's investigation, or another law enforcement investigation, by
causing the improper influencing of witnesses, retaliation against
witnesses, destruction of evidence, or fabrication of testimony.
(2) 5 U.S.C. 552a(d) requires an agency to permit an individual to
gain access to records pertaining to such individual, to request
amendment to such records, to request review of an agency decision not
to amend such records, and, where the Agency refuses to amend records,
to submit a statement of disagreement to be included with the records.
Such disclosure of investigatory information could seriously impede or
compromise the Agency's investigation by revealing the identity of
confidential sources or confidential business information, or causing
the improper influencing of witnesses, retaliation against witnesses,
destruction of evidence, fabrication of testimony, or unwarranted
invasion of the privacy of others. Amendment of the records could
interfere with ongoing law enforcement proceedings and impose an undue
administrative burden by requiring investigations to be continuously
reinvestigated.
(3) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) requires an agency to maintain in its
records only such information about an individual as is relevant and
necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required by statute or
by executive order of the President. This requirement could foreclose
investigators from acquiring or receiving information the relevance and
necessity of which is not readily apparent and could only be
ascertained after a complete review and evaluation of all the evidence.
(4) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(G) and (H) require an agency to publish a
Federal Register notice concerning its procedures for notifying an
individual, at the individual's request, if the system of records
contains a record pertaining to the individual, for gaining access to
such a record, and for contesting its content. Because certain
information from these systems of records is exempt from subsection (d)
of the Act concerning access to records, and consequently, from
subsection (f) of the Act concerning Agency rules governing access,
these requirements are inapplicable to that information.
(5) 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(4)(I) requires an agency to publish a Federal
Register notice concerning the categories of sources of records in the
system of records. Exemption from this provision is necessary to
protect the confidentiality of sources of information, to protect
against the disclosure of investigative techniques and procedures, to
avoid threats or reprisals against informers by subjects of
investigations, and to protect against informers refusing to give full
information to investigators for fear of having their identities as
sources revealed.
(6) 5 U.S.C. 552a(f) requires an agency to promulgate rules for
notifying individuals of Privacy Act rights granted by subsection (d)
of the Act concerning access and amendment of records. Because certain
information from these systems is exempt from subsection (d) of the
Act, the requirements of subsection (f) of the Act are inapplicable to
that information.
Dated: Washington, DC, November 15, 2006.
By direction of the Board.
Lester A. Heltzer,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9682 Filed 12-12-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7545-01-P