Long-Term Experimental Plan for the Operation of Glen Canyon Dam and Other Associated Management Activities, 74556-74558 [E6-20756]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
74556
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Notices
regulations as the Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) may prescribe,
including all necessary access and exit
rights.
3. A reversionary interest as further
defined in the above terms, covenants
and conditions.
When patented, title to the land will
be subject to:
1. Valid existing rights of record,
including, but not limited to those
documented on the BLM public land
records at the time of sale, and,
2. By accepting the patent, Clark
County, subject to the limitations of law
and to the extent allowed by law, shall
be responsible for the acts or omissions
of its officers, directors and employees
in connection with the use or
occupancy of the patented real property.
Successors-in-interests of the patented
real property, except Clark County, shall
indemnify, defend, and hold the United
States and Clark County harmless from
any costs, damages, claims, causes of
action, penalties, fines, liabilities, and
judgments of any kind or nature arising
from the past, present, and future acts
or omissions of the successors-ininterest, excluding Clark County, or its
employees, agents, contractors, or
lessees, or any third-party, arising out of
or in connection with the successor-ininterests, excluding Clark County, use,
occupancy, or operations on the
patented real property. This
indemnification and hold harmless
agreement includes, but is not limited
to, acts and omissions of the successorin-interests, excluding Clark County,
and its employees, agents, contractors,
or lessees, or any third party, arising out
of or in connection with the use and/or
occupancy of the patented real property
which has already resulted or does
hereafter result in: (1) Violations of
Federal, State, and local laws and
regulations that are now or may in the
future become, applicable to the real
property; (2) Judgments, claims or
demands of any kind assessed against
the United States or Clark County; (3)
Costs, expenses, or damages of any kind
incurred by the United States or Clark
County; (4) Other releases or threatened
releases of solid or hazardous waste(s)
and/or hazardous substances(s), as
defined by Federal or State
environmental laws, off, on, into or
under land, property and other interests
of the United States or Clark County; (5)
Other activities by which solids or
hazardous substances or wastes, as
defined by Federal and State
environmental laws are generated,
released, stored, used or otherwise
disposed of on the patented real
property, and any cleanup response,
remedial action or other actions related
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Dec 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
in any manner to said solid or
hazardous substances or wastes; or (6)
Natural resource damages as defined by
Federal and State law. This covenant
shall be construed as running with the
parcels of land patented or otherwise
conveyed by the United States, and may
be enforced against successors-ininterest, excluding Clark County, by the
United States or Clark County in a court
of competent jurisdiction.
No warranty of any kind, express or
implied is given or will be given by the
United States as to the title, physical
condition or potential uses of the land
proposed for sale. However, to the
extent required by law, such land is
subject to the requirements of Section
120(h) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response Compensation
and Liability Act (CERCLA), as
amended (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)).
Publication of this notice in the
Federal Register temporarily segregates
the above described land from
appropriation under the public land
laws, including the mining laws. The
segregation effect of this notice will
terminate in the future as specified in 43
CFR 2711.1–3(c)). The above described
land was previously segregated from
mineral entry under BLM case file
number N–66364, with record notation
as of October 19, 1998. This previous
segregation will terminate upon
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Detailed information concerning the
proposed sale, including an
environmental studies and documents,
approved appraisal report and
supporting documents, is available for
review at the BLM Las Vegas Field
Office at the address above. Interested
parties may submit written comments
regarding the sale, including the EA, to
the address above. No facsimiles, emails, or telephone calls will be
considered as validly submitted
comments. The Field Manager, BLM,
Las Vegas Field Office, will review the
comments of all interested parties
concerning the sale. To be considered,
comments must be received at the BLM
Las Vegas Field Office on or before the
date stated above in this notice for that
purpose. Comments received during this
process, including respondent’s name,
address, and other contact information
will be available for public review.
Individual respondents may request
confidentiality. If you wish to request
that BLM consider withholding your
name, address, and other contact
information from public review or
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. The BLM will honor requests
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for confidentiality on a case-by-case
basis to the extent allowed by law. The
BLM will make available for public
review, in their entirety, all comments
submitted by businesses or
organizations, including comments by
individuals in their capacity as an
official or representative of a business or
organization. Any adverse comments
will be reviewed by the BLM, Nevada
State Director who may sustain, vacate,
or modify this realty action.
In the absence of any adverse
comments, the decision will become
effective on February 12, 2007. The
lands will not be offered for sale until
after the decision becomes effective.
(Authority: 43 CFR 2711.1–2(a)).
Dated: November 24, 2006.
Sharon DiPinto,
Assistant Field Manager, Division of Lands,
Las Vegas, NV.
[FR Doc. E6–21041 Filed 12–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Long-Term Experimental Plan for the
Operation of Glen Canyon Dam and
Other Associated Management
Activities
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
and notice to solicit comments and hold
additional public scoping meetings on
the adoption of a Long-Term
Experimental Plan for the operation of
Glen Canyon Dam and other associated
management activities under the
authority of the Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In a Federal Register notice
published on November 6, 2006 (71 FR
64982–64983), and pursuant to
§ 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as amended, and 40 CFR 1508.22,
the Department of the Interior
(Department), acting through the Bureau
of Reclamation (Reclamation), provided
notice that the Department intends to
prepare an EIS and conduct public
scoping meetings for the adoption of a
Long-Term Experimental Plan for the
operation of Glen Canyon Dam and
other associated management activities.
This Federal Register notice, prepared
pursuant to 40 CFR 1508.22, provides
information on additional public
scoping meetings, the purpose and need
for the proposed action, and additional
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Notices
background on the Long-Term
Experimental Plan.
The purpose of the Long-Term
Experimental Plan is to increase
understanding of the ecosystem
downstream from Glen Canyon Dam
and to improve and protect important
downstream resources. The NEPA
process would evaluate the implications
and impacts of each of the alternatives
on all of the purposes and benefits of
Glen Canyon Dam as well as on
downstream resources. The proposed
plan would implement a structured,
long-term program of experimentation
(including dam operations,
modifications to Glen Canyon Dam
intake structures, and other non-flow
management actions, such as removal of
non-native fish species) and monitoring
in the Colorado River below Glen
Canyon Dam.
The proposed Long-Term
Experimental Plan is intended to ensure
a continued, structured application of
adaptive management in such a manner
as to protect, mitigate adverse impacts
to, and improve the values for which
Grand Canyon National Park and Glen
Canyon National Recreation Area were
established, including, but not limited
to natural and cultural resources and
visitor use, consistent with applicable
Federal law.
The Long-Term Experimental Plan
will build on a decade of scientific
experimentation and monitoring that
has taken place as part of the Glen
Canyon Dam Adaptive Management
Program, and will build on the
knowledge gained by experiments,
operations, and management actions
taken under the program. Accordingly,
Reclamation intends to tier from earlier
NEPA compliance documents prepared
as part of the Department’s Glen Canyon
Adaptive Management Program efforts,
see 40 CFR 1500.4(i), 1502.20, and
1508.20(b), such as the 2002
Environmental Assessment prepared on
adaptive management experimental
actions at Glen Canyon Dam (Proposed
Experimental Releases from Glen
Canyon Dam and Removal of NonNative Fish).
Dates and Addresses: Two additional
public scoping meetings will be held to
solicit comments on the scope of the
Long-Term Experimental Plan and the
issues and alternatives that should be
analyzed. The meetings will serve to
expand upon the input received from
the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive
Management Program meetings and the
recommendations of the Adaptive
Management Work Group (AMWG), a
federal advisory committee. Oral and
written comments will be accepted at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Dec 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
the meetings to be held at the following
locations:
• Thursday, January 4, 2007—6 p.m.
to 8 p.m., Embassy Suites Phoenix
Airport at 44th Street, 1515 North 44th
Street, Cholla Room, Phoenix, Arizona.
• Friday, January 5, 2007—6 p.m. to
8 p.m., Hilton Salt Lake City Center, 255
South West Temple, Salon 1, Salt Lake
City, Utah.
Written comments on the proposed
development of the Long-Term
Experimental Plan may be sent by close
of business on Wednesday, February 28,
2007, to: Regional Director, Bureau of
Reclamation, Upper Colorado Region,
Attention: UC–402, 125 South State
Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84318–1147,
faxogram at (801) 524–3858, or e-mail at
GCDExpPlan@uc.usbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dennis Kubly, Bureau of Reclamation,
telephone (801) 524–3715; faxogram
(801) 524–3858; e-mail at
GCDExpPlan@uc.usbr.gov. If special
assistance is required regarding
accommodations for attendance at either
of the public meetings, please contact
Jayne Kelleher at (801) 524–3680,
faxogram at (801) 524–3858, or e-mail at
jkelleher@uc.usbr.gov no less than 5
working days prior to the applicable
meeting(s).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Glen
Canyon Dam was authorized by the
Colorado River Storage Project Act
(CRSPA) of 1956 and completed by
Reclamation in 1963. Below Glen
Canyon Dam, the Colorado River flows
for 15 miles through the Glen Canyon
National Recreation Area which is
managed by the National Park Service.
Fifteen miles below Glen Canyon Dam,
Lees Ferry, Arizona, marks the
beginning of Marble Canyon and the
northern boundary of Grand Canyon
National Park.
The primary purpose and major
function of Glen Canyon Dam is water
conservation and storage. The dam is
specifically managed to regulate releases
of water from the Upper Colorado River
Basin to the Lower Colorado River Basin
to satisfy provisions of the 1922
Colorado River Compact and subsequent
water delivery commitments, and
thereby allow states within the Upper
Basin to deplete water from the
watershed upstream of Glen Canyon
Dam and utilize their apportionments of
Colorado River water.
In addition to the primary purpose of
water delivery, another function of Glen
Canyon Dam is to generate hydroelectric
power. Between the dam’s completion
in 1963 and 1990, the dam’s daily
operations were primarily undertaken to
maximize generation of hydroelectric
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74557
power in accordance with Section 7 of
the CRSPA, which requires production
of the greatest practicable amount of
power.
Over time, concerns arose with
respect to the operation of Glen Canyon
Dam, including effects of operations on
species listed pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act. In 1992,
Congress passed and the President
signed into law, the Grand Canyon
Protection Act which addresses
potential impacts of dam operations on
downstream resources in Glen Canyon
National Recreation Area and Grand
Canyon National Park.
The Grand Canyon Protection Act of
1992 required the Secretary to complete
an environmental impact statement
evaluating alternative operating criteria,
consistent with existing law, that would
determine how Glen Canyon Dam
would be operated to both meet the
purposes for which the dam was
authorized and meet the goals for
protection of Glen Canyon National
Recreation Area and Grand Canyon
National Park. The final environmental
impact statement was completed in
March 1995. The Preferred Alternative
(Modified Low Fluctuating Flow
Alternative) was selected as the best
means to operate Glen Canyon Dam in
a Record of Decision (ROD) issued on
October 9, 1996. In 1997 the Secretary
adopted operating criteria for Glen
Canyon Dam (62 FR 9447–9448) as
required by Section 1804(c) of the Grand
Canyon Protection Act of 1992.
Additionally, the Grand Canyon
Protection Act of 1992 requires the
Secretary to undertake research and
monitoring to determine if revised dam
operations were achieving the resource
protection objectives of the final EIS and
ROD. These provisions of the Grand
Canyon Protection Act of 1992 were
incorporated into the 1996 ROD and led
to the establishment of the Glen Canyon
Dam Adaptive Management Program,
administered by Reclamation, and of the
Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research
Center within the U.S. Geological
Survey (USGS).
The Adaptive Management Program
includes a federal advisory committee
known as the AMWG, a Technical Work
Group, a monitoring and research center
administered by the USGS, and
independent review panels. The
Technical Work Group is a
subcommittee of the AMWG and
provides technical advice and
recommendations to the AMWG. The
AMWG makes recommendations to the
Secretary concerning Glen Canyon Dam
operations and other management
actions to protect resources downstream
from Glen Canyon Dam consistent with
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
74558
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
the Grand Canyon Protection Act and
other applicable provisions of Federal
law.
To improve scientific understanding
of the downstream ecosystem, periodic
experimental releases from Glen Canyon
Dam were conducted in water years
1996 through 2006. Non-flow actions
were also conducted, including removal
of non-native fish and translocation of
the endangered Kanab ambersnail and
humpback chub. Specific experimental
actions included:
• 1996 test of a Beach Habitat
Building Flow (BHBF) at 45,000 cubic
feet per second (cfs) and translocation of
endangered Kanab ambersnail.
• 2000 test of Low Steady Summer
Flows at 8,000 cfs.
• 2003—2005 block of experimental
actions which included:
Æ Translocation of endangered
humpback chub above Chute Falls.
Æ Winter fluctuating fish suppression
releases (5,000 to 20,000 cfs).
Æ Mechanical removal of non-native
fish near the confluence of the Little
Colorado River to benefit the humpback
chub.
Æ Fall constrained releases to test the
conservation of sediment (6,500 to 9,000
cfs).
Æ 2004 test of a BHBF at 42,000 cfs
immediately following Paria River
sediment inputs.
In addition, drought-induced
reductions in Lake Powell elevations
caused an increase in dam release
temperatures during 2003 to 2005.
Considerable monitoring and research
on endangered fish, sediment
conservation, and other resources in the
Grand Canyon were conducted in
concert with these actions. Among other
documents related to adaptive
management experimentation, two
Environmental Assessments and
Findings of No Significant Impacts were
prepared: Proposed Experimental
Releases from Glen Canyon Dam and
Removal of Non-Native Fish (2002) and
Proposed Experimental Actions for
Water Years 2005–2006—Colorado
River, Arizona, in Glen Canyon National
Recreation Area and Grand Canyon
National Park (2004). These two
documents can be found at the
following Internet location: https://
www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/gcdltep/
index.html.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to develop and
adopt a Long-Term Experimental Plan
that will implement a structured, longterm program of experimentation
(including dam operations,
modifications to Glen Canyon Dam
intake structures, and other non-flow
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Dec 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
management actions, such as removal of
non-native fish species) in the Colorado
River below Glen Canyon Dam.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the proposed action is
to increase scientific understanding of
the ecosystem downstream from Glen
Canyon Dam and to improve and protect
important downstream resources.
Specific hypotheses to be addressed
include the effect of dam release
temperatures; ramp rates; non-native
control; and the timing, duration, and
magnitude of BHBF releases. Adoption
of a Long-Term Experimental Plan is
needed to ensure a continued,
structured application of adaptive
management in such a manner as to
protect, mitigate adverse impacts to, and
improve the values for which Grand
Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon
National Recreation Area were
established, including, but not limited
to natural and cultural resources and
visitor use, consistent with applicable
Federal law. Adoption of a Long-Term
Experimental Plan will assist scientists,
policy makers, and resource managers to
better understand resource management
options, tradeoffs and consequences,
and assist in the long-term operations of
Glen Canyon Dam.
Scoping
The range of alternatives for the
proposed action will be developed
following recommendations provided
by the AMWG and through information
received from upcoming public scoping
meetings. In addition, Reclamation will
utilize information developed through
prior meetings of the AMWG, Technical
Work Group, and Science Planning
Group as relevant information for the
purposes of scoping the upcoming
NEPA process and to develop the
appropriate scope of analysis pursuant
to 40 CFR 1508.25.
Public Disclosure
It is our practice to make comments,
including names, home addresses, home
telephone numbers, and e-mail
addresses of respondents, available for
public review. Individual respondents
may request that we withhold their
names and/or home addresses, etc., but
if you wish us to consider withholding
this information you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comments. In addition, you must
present a rationale for withholding this
information. This rationale must
demonstrate that disclosure would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of privacy. Unsupported
assertions will not meet this burden. In
the absence of exceptional,
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
documentable circumstances, this
information will be released. We will
always make submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Dated: November 17, 2006.
Rick L. Gold,
Regional Director—UC Region, Bureau of
Reclamation.
[FR Doc. E6–20756 Filed 12–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–961 (Final)
(Remand)]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod From Trinidad and Tobago; Notice
and Scheduling of Remand Proceeding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The United States
International Trade Commission
(Commission) gives notice of the courtordered remand of its final antidumping
duty investigation, Investigation No.
731–TA–961 (Final) (Remand).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan J. Engler, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, telephone (202) 205–
3112, or Mary Messer, Office of
Investigations, telephone (202) 205–
3193, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810. General information
concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its Internet server
(https://www.usitc.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Reopening the Record
In October 2002, the Commission
made a final affirmative determination
in the referenced investigation. 67 FR
66662 (Nov. 1, 2002). Respondent
appealed the determination to the U.S.
Court of International Trade (CIT),
which affirmed the Commission’s
determination. Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v.
United States, Slip Op. 05–37 (March
22, 2005). Respondent appealed to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit, which vacated and remanded
the Commission’s determination.
Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. United States,
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74556-74558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20756]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Long-Term Experimental Plan for the Operation of Glen Canyon Dam
and Other Associated Management Activities
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement
(EIS) and notice to solicit comments and hold additional public scoping
meetings on the adoption of a Long-Term Experimental Plan for the
operation of Glen Canyon Dam and other associated management activities
under the authority of the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In a Federal Register notice published on November 6, 2006 (71
FR 64982-64983), and pursuant to Sec. 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, and 40 CFR
1508.22, the Department of the Interior (Department), acting through
the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), provided notice that the
Department intends to prepare an EIS and conduct public scoping
meetings for the adoption of a Long-Term Experimental Plan for the
operation of Glen Canyon Dam and other associated management
activities. This Federal Register notice, prepared pursuant to 40 CFR
1508.22, provides information on additional public scoping meetings,
the purpose and need for the proposed action, and additional
[[Page 74557]]
background on the Long-Term Experimental Plan.
The purpose of the Long-Term Experimental Plan is to increase
understanding of the ecosystem downstream from Glen Canyon Dam and to
improve and protect important downstream resources. The NEPA process
would evaluate the implications and impacts of each of the alternatives
on all of the purposes and benefits of Glen Canyon Dam as well as on
downstream resources. The proposed plan would implement a structured,
long-term program of experimentation (including dam operations,
modifications to Glen Canyon Dam intake structures, and other non-flow
management actions, such as removal of non-native fish species) and
monitoring in the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam.
The proposed Long-Term Experimental Plan is intended to ensure a
continued, structured application of adaptive management in such a
manner as to protect, mitigate adverse impacts to, and improve the
values for which Grand Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon National
Recreation Area were established, including, but not limited to natural
and cultural resources and visitor use, consistent with applicable
Federal law.
The Long-Term Experimental Plan will build on a decade of
scientific experimentation and monitoring that has taken place as part
of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program, and will build on
the knowledge gained by experiments, operations, and management actions
taken under the program. Accordingly, Reclamation intends to tier from
earlier NEPA compliance documents prepared as part of the Department's
Glen Canyon Adaptive Management Program efforts, see 40 CFR 1500.4(i),
1502.20, and 1508.20(b), such as the 2002 Environmental Assessment
prepared on adaptive management experimental actions at Glen Canyon Dam
(Proposed Experimental Releases from Glen Canyon Dam and Removal of
Non-Native Fish).
Dates and Addresses: Two additional public scoping meetings will be
held to solicit comments on the scope of the Long-Term Experimental
Plan and the issues and alternatives that should be analyzed. The
meetings will serve to expand upon the input received from the Glen
Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program meetings and the recommendations
of the Adaptive Management Work Group (AMWG), a federal advisory
committee. Oral and written comments will be accepted at the meetings
to be held at the following locations:
Thursday, January 4, 2007--6 p.m. to 8 p.m., Embassy
Suites Phoenix Airport at 44th Street, 1515 North 44th Street, Cholla
Room, Phoenix, Arizona.
Friday, January 5, 2007--6 p.m. to 8 p.m., Hilton Salt
Lake City Center, 255 South West Temple, Salon 1, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Written comments on the proposed development of the Long-Term
Experimental Plan may be sent by close of business on Wednesday,
February 28, 2007, to: Regional Director, Bureau of Reclamation, Upper
Colorado Region, Attention: UC-402, 125 South State Street, Salt Lake
City, Utah 84318-1147, faxogram at (801) 524-3858, or e-mail at
GCDExpPlan@uc.usbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dennis Kubly, Bureau of Reclamation,
telephone (801) 524-3715; faxogram (801) 524-3858; e-mail at
GCDExpPlan@uc.usbr.gov. If special assistance is required regarding
accommodations for attendance at either of the public meetings, please
contact Jayne Kelleher at (801) 524-3680, faxogram at (801) 524-3858,
or e-mail at jkelleher@uc.usbr.gov no less than 5 working days prior to
the applicable meeting(s).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Glen Canyon Dam was authorized by the
Colorado River Storage Project Act (CRSPA) of 1956 and completed by
Reclamation in 1963. Below Glen Canyon Dam, the Colorado River flows
for 15 miles through the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area which is
managed by the National Park Service. Fifteen miles below Glen Canyon
Dam, Lees Ferry, Arizona, marks the beginning of Marble Canyon and the
northern boundary of Grand Canyon National Park.
The primary purpose and major function of Glen Canyon Dam is water
conservation and storage. The dam is specifically managed to regulate
releases of water from the Upper Colorado River Basin to the Lower
Colorado River Basin to satisfy provisions of the 1922 Colorado River
Compact and subsequent water delivery commitments, and thereby allow
states within the Upper Basin to deplete water from the watershed
upstream of Glen Canyon Dam and utilize their apportionments of
Colorado River water.
In addition to the primary purpose of water delivery, another
function of Glen Canyon Dam is to generate hydroelectric power. Between
the dam's completion in 1963 and 1990, the dam's daily operations were
primarily undertaken to maximize generation of hydroelectric power in
accordance with Section 7 of the CRSPA, which requires production of
the greatest practicable amount of power.
Over time, concerns arose with respect to the operation of Glen
Canyon Dam, including effects of operations on species listed pursuant
to the Endangered Species Act. In 1992, Congress passed and the
President signed into law, the Grand Canyon Protection Act which
addresses potential impacts of dam operations on downstream resources
in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Grand Canyon National Park.
The Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992 required the Secretary to
complete an environmental impact statement evaluating alternative
operating criteria, consistent with existing law, that would determine
how Glen Canyon Dam would be operated to both meet the purposes for
which the dam was authorized and meet the goals for protection of Glen
Canyon National Recreation Area and Grand Canyon National Park. The
final environmental impact statement was completed in March 1995. The
Preferred Alternative (Modified Low Fluctuating Flow Alternative) was
selected as the best means to operate Glen Canyon Dam in a Record of
Decision (ROD) issued on October 9, 1996. In 1997 the Secretary adopted
operating criteria for Glen Canyon Dam (62 FR 9447-9448) as required by
Section 1804(c) of the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992.
Additionally, the Grand Canyon Protection Act of 1992 requires the
Secretary to undertake research and monitoring to determine if revised
dam operations were achieving the resource protection objectives of the
final EIS and ROD. These provisions of the Grand Canyon Protection Act
of 1992 were incorporated into the 1996 ROD and led to the
establishment of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program,
administered by Reclamation, and of the Grand Canyon Monitoring and
Research Center within the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
The Adaptive Management Program includes a federal advisory
committee known as the AMWG, a Technical Work Group, a monitoring and
research center administered by the USGS, and independent review
panels. The Technical Work Group is a subcommittee of the AMWG and
provides technical advice and recommendations to the AMWG. The AMWG
makes recommendations to the Secretary concerning Glen Canyon Dam
operations and other management actions to protect resources downstream
from Glen Canyon Dam consistent with
[[Page 74558]]
the Grand Canyon Protection Act and other applicable provisions of
Federal law.
To improve scientific understanding of the downstream ecosystem,
periodic experimental releases from Glen Canyon Dam were conducted in
water years 1996 through 2006. Non-flow actions were also conducted,
including removal of non-native fish and translocation of the
endangered Kanab ambersnail and humpback chub. Specific experimental
actions included:
1996 test of a Beach Habitat Building Flow (BHBF) at
45,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) and translocation of endangered
Kanab ambersnail.
2000 test of Low Steady Summer Flows at 8,000 cfs.
2003--2005 block of experimental actions which included:
[cir] Translocation of endangered humpback chub above Chute Falls.
[cir] Winter fluctuating fish suppression releases (5,000 to 20,000
cfs).
[cir] Mechanical removal of non-native fish near the confluence of
the Little Colorado River to benefit the humpback chub.
[cir] Fall constrained releases to test the conservation of
sediment (6,500 to 9,000 cfs).
[cir] 2004 test of a BHBF at 42,000 cfs immediately following Paria
River sediment inputs.
In addition, drought-induced reductions in Lake Powell elevations
caused an increase in dam release temperatures during 2003 to 2005.
Considerable monitoring and research on endangered fish, sediment
conservation, and other resources in the Grand Canyon were conducted in
concert with these actions. Among other documents related to adaptive
management experimentation, two Environmental Assessments and Findings
of No Significant Impacts were prepared: Proposed Experimental Releases
from Glen Canyon Dam and Removal of Non-Native Fish (2002) and Proposed
Experimental Actions for Water Years 2005-2006--Colorado River,
Arizona, in Glen Canyon National Recreation Area and Grand Canyon
National Park (2004). These two documents can be found at the following
Internet location: https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/gcdltep/.
Proposed Action
The proposed action is to develop and adopt a Long-Term
Experimental Plan that will implement a structured, long-term program
of experimentation (including dam operations, modifications to Glen
Canyon Dam intake structures, and other non-flow management actions,
such as removal of non-native fish species) in the Colorado River below
Glen Canyon Dam.
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose of the proposed action is to increase scientific
understanding of the ecosystem downstream from Glen Canyon Dam and to
improve and protect important downstream resources. Specific hypotheses
to be addressed include the effect of dam release temperatures; ramp
rates; non-native control; and the timing, duration, and magnitude of
BHBF releases. Adoption of a Long-Term Experimental Plan is needed to
ensure a continued, structured application of adaptive management in
such a manner as to protect, mitigate adverse impacts to, and improve
the values for which Grand Canyon National Park and Glen Canyon
National Recreation Area were established, including, but not limited
to natural and cultural resources and visitor use, consistent with
applicable Federal law. Adoption of a Long-Term Experimental Plan will
assist scientists, policy makers, and resource managers to better
understand resource management options, tradeoffs and consequences, and
assist in the long-term operations of Glen Canyon Dam.
Scoping
The range of alternatives for the proposed action will be developed
following recommendations provided by the AMWG and through information
received from upcoming public scoping meetings. In addition,
Reclamation will utilize information developed through prior meetings
of the AMWG, Technical Work Group, and Science Planning Group as
relevant information for the purposes of scoping the upcoming NEPA
process and to develop the appropriate scope of analysis pursuant to 40
CFR 1508.25.
Public Disclosure
It is our practice to make comments, including names, home
addresses, home telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses of respondents,
available for public review. Individual respondents may request that we
withhold their names and/or home addresses, etc., but if you wish us to
consider withholding this information you must state this prominently
at the beginning of your comments. In addition, you must present a
rationale for withholding this information. This rationale must
demonstrate that disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of privacy. Unsupported assertions will not meet this burden.
In the absence of exceptional, documentable circumstances, this
information will be released. We will always make submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying
themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or
businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
Dated: November 17, 2006.
Rick L. Gold,
Regional Director--UC Region, Bureau of Reclamation.
[FR Doc. E6-20756 Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P