Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-Open Systemic Initiative, 74559 [06-9645]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Notices
450 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2006). On
October 13, 2006, the CIT issued an
order remanding the case to the
Commission to comply with the Federal
Circuit’s decision in Caribbean Ispat
and giving the Commission until
January 12, 2007, to issue its remand
determination. The Commission is
seeking an extension of that deadline in
order to allow the Commission to send
out additional questionnaires to obtain
further data relevant to the remand
instructions. In the meantime, the
Commission is proceeding based on the
existing deadline, in accordance with
the schedule set out below.
In order to assist it in making its
determination on remand, the
Commission is reopening the record on
remand in this investigation to include
additional information on the role of
non-subject imports of carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod in the U.S.
market during the original period of
investigation. The record in this
proceeding will encompass the material
from the record of the original
investigation and additional information
placed by Commission staff on the
record during this remand proceeding.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Participation in the Proceeding
Only those persons who were
interested parties in the original
administrative proceeding and are
parties to the ongoing litigation (i.e.,
persons listed on the Commission
Secretary’s service list and parties to
Caribbean Ispat Ltd. v. U.S., Court No.
05–1400) may participate as interested
parties in this remand proceeding.
Nature of the Remand Proceeding
On December 15, 2006, the
Commission will make available to
parties who participate in the remand
proceeding information that has been
gathered by the Commission as part of
this remand proceeding. Parties that are
participating in the remand proceeding
may file comments on or before
December 22, 2006, addressing the
record facts as they relate to the
question raised in the CIT’s remand
instructions. Such comments shall not
exceed 25 double-spaced pages.
In addition, all written submissions
must conform with the provisions of
section 201.8 of the Commission’s rules;
any submissions that contain business
proprietary information (BPI) must also
conform with the requirements of
sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the
Commission’s rules. The Commission’s
rules do not authorize filing
submissions with the Secretary by
facsimile or electronic means, except to
the extent permitted by section 201.8 of
the Commission’s rules, as amended, 67
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Dec 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
FR 68036 (November 8, 2002). Even
where electronic filing of a document is
permitted, certain documents must also
be filed in paper form, as specified in II
(C) of the Commission’s Handbook on
Electronic Filing Procedures, 67 FR
68168, 68173 (November 8, 2002). Each
document filed by a party participating
in the remand investigation must be
served on all other parties who may
participate in the remand investigation
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service. Parties are also
advised to consult the Commission’s
Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR
part 207), for provisions of general
applicability concerning written
submissions to the Commission.
At this time, the Commission’s
remand determination is due to be
submitted to the CIT on January 12,
2007. On December 4, 2006, the
Commission filed a motion with that
Court to extend the time to file its
remand determination until March 12,
2006. In the event the CIT grants the
motion, or otherwise modifies the date
on which the Commission’s remand
determination is due to the Court, the
Commission intends to issue an
amended notice and schedule.
Limited Disclosure of Business
Proprietary Information (BPI) Under an
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
and BPI Service List
Information obtained during the
remand investigation will be released to
the referenced parties, as appropriate,
under the administrative protective
order (APO) in effect in the original
investigation. A separate service list will
be maintained by the Secretary for those
parties authorized to receive BPI under
the APO in this remand investigation.
Authority: This action is taken under the
authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, title VII.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 7, 2006.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E6–21119 Filed 12–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
PO 00000
74559
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Open Systemic Initiative
Notice is hereby given that, on
November 13, 2006, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), Open
SystemC Initiative (‘‘OSCI’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
Actis Design, LLC, Portland, OR;
Broadcom Corporation, Bristol, United
Kingdom; Denali Software, Inc., Palo
Alto, CA; Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.,
Herzelia, Israel; NEC Corporation,
Kawasaki, Japan; SpringSoft, Inc.,
Hsinchu, Taiwan; and Vast Systems,
Inc., Sunnyvale, CA have been added as
parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and OSCI intends
to file additional written notifications
disclosing all changes in membership.
On October 9, 2001, OSCI filed its
original notification pursuant to Section
6(a) of the Act. The Department of
Justice published a notice in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on January 3, 2002 (67 FR 350).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on February 27, 2006. A
notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on March 27, 2006 (71 FR 15218).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust
Division.
[FR Doc. 06–9645 Filed 12–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—Power Tool Institute
Table Saw Guarding Joint Venture
Project
Notice is hereby given that, on
november 2, 2006, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the national Cooperative
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Page 74559]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9645]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--Open Systemic Initiative
Notice is hereby given that, on November 13, 2006, pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open SystemC Initiative
(``OSCI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
Specifically, Actis Design, LLC, Portland, OR; Broadcom Corporation,
Bristol, United Kingdom; Denali Software, Inc., Palo Alto, CA;
Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., Herzelia, Israel; NEC Corporation,
Kawasaki, Japan; SpringSoft, Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan; and Vast Systems,
Inc., Sunnyvale, CA have been added as parties to this venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and OSCI intends to file additional
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
On October 9, 2001, OSCI filed its original notification pursuant
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on
January 3, 2002 (67 FR 350).
The last notification was filed with the Department on February 27,
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2006 (71 FR 15218).
Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 06-9645 Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
