Cancellation of Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement for Sacramento International Airport, Sacramento, Sacramento County, CA, 74572-74573 [06-9627]
Download as PDF
74572
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Notices
How To Obtain Copies
You may also obtain a copy of the AC
via the Internet, by logging onto the
FAA’s Regulatory and Guidance Library
(RGL) at: https://www.airweb.faa.gov/rgl.
On the RGL Web site, click on
‘‘Advisory Circular, then select Current
ACs by number.’’ Or, contact the person
listed in the section titled FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 1,
2006.
Susan J.M. Cabler,
Assistant Manager, Aircraft Engineering
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 06–9629 Filed 12–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Agency Information Collection Activity
Seeking OMB Approval
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: The FAA invites public
comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget’s
(OMB) revision of a current information
collection. The Federal Register Notice
with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the following collection of
information was published on August 8,
2006, vol. 71, no. 152, pages 45092–
45093. The Administrator has
determined based on evaluation of
previous accidents and other incidents
that certain events involving
malfunctions and defects may be
precursors to the recurrence of these
accidents. As a result, operators and
repair stations are required to report any
malfunctions and defects to the
Administrator.
DATES: Please submit comments by
January 11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carla Mauney at Carla.Mauney@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
Title: Service Difficulty Report.
Type of Request: Extension without
change of a currently approved
collection.
OMB Control Number: 2120–0663.
Forms(s): 8070–1.
Affected Public: An estimated 7,695
Respondents.
Frequency: This information is
collected on occasion.
Estimated Average Burden Per
Response: Approximately 48 minutes
per response.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Dec 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 6,107 hours annually.
Abstract: The Administrator has
determined based on evaluation of
previous accidents and other incidents
that certain events involving
malfunctions and defects may be
precursors to the recurrence of these
accidents. As a result, operators and
repair stations are required to report any
malfunctions and defects to the
Administrator.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer,
Department of Transportation/FAA, and
sent via electronic mail to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or faxed
to (202) 395–6974.
Comments are invited on: Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; the accuracy of
the Department’s estimates of the
burden of the proposed information
collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Issued in Washington, DC, on December 5,
2006.
Carl Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Strategy and Investment Analysis
Division, AIO–20.
[FR Doc. 06–9628 Filed 12–11–06; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Cancellation of Preparation of
Environmental Impact Statement for
Sacramento International Airport,
Sacramento, Sacramento County, CA
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation of
preparation of Environmental Impact
Statement.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces that it
has discontinued preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for a proposed runway extension project
and other associated development at
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Sacramento International Airport,
Sacramento, California. The FAA is
doing this because Sacramento County,
the owner and operator of the airport, is
deferring its proposed runway extension
project to a long-term planning horizon
(2020). As a result, FAA has determined
the runway extension proposal at
Sacramento International airport is not
ripe for decision at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Camille Garibaldi, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Federal Aviation
Administration, San Francisco Airports
District Office, 831 Mitten Road,
Burlingame, California 94010;
telephone: 650/876–2778 extension 613.
On August
9, 2005, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) issued a Notice of
Intent in the Federal Register (70 FR
46260–46261) to prepare an EIS for
future development at Sacramento
International Airport, Sacramento,
California. The FAA based its decision
to prepare the EIS on the procedures
described in FAA Order 1050.1E,
Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures. FAA also based its decision
to prepare a federal EIS primarily on
Sacramento County’s proposal to extend
Runway 16L/34R to a total length of
11,000 feet. Sacramento County, owner
and operator of Sacramento
International Airport, notified the FAA,
by letter dated September 5, 2006, of the
County’s decision to withdraw its
request for FAA consideration of the
proposed extension to Runway 16L/34R
at this time. The County will provide
FAA with a revised list of proposed
improvements to Sacramento
International Airport. When FAA
receives the County’s revised list of
proposed improvements and a suggested
implementation schedule, FAA will:
• Evaluate each of the proposed
improvements:
• Decide if Sacramento County has
completed sufficient planning to enable
FAA to meaningfully evaluate the
potential environmental effects of those
improvements;
• Determine the NEPA document
necessary to assess the environmental
effects of those improvements pursuant
to FAA Order 5050.4B, National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Implementing Instructions for Airport
Actions; and
• Suggest a schedule for completing
the necessary NEPA process.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 238 / Tuesday, December 12, 2006 / Notices
Issued in Hawthorne, California on
December 1, 2006.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, Western-Pacific
Region, AWP–600.
[FR Doc. 06–9627 Filed 12–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Cancellation of Preparation of
Environmental Impact Statement for
Ontario International Airport, Ontario,
San Bernardino County, CA
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation of
preparation of Environmental Impact
Statement.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:00 Dec 11, 2006
Jkt 211001
Issued in Hawthorne, California on
December 1, 2006.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, Western-Pacific
Region, AWP–600.
[FR Doc. 06–9626 Filed 12–11–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces that it
has decided to discontinue preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for master plan improvements to
Ontario International Airport, Ontario,
California. The FAA’s decision to
discontinue preparation of the EIS is
based upon the decision by Los Angeles
World Airports, the owner of the
airport, to discontinue pursuit of the
master plan for Ontario International
Airport at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Victor Globa, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Federal Aviation
Administration, Los Angeles Airports
District Office, P.O. Box 92007, Los
Angeles, California 90009–2007,
Telephone: (310) 725–3637.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 9,
2004, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) issued a Notice of
intent to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement for future
development at Ontario International
Airport, Ontario, California in the
Federal Register (69 FR 32394–32396).
The need to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) was based on the
procedures described in FAA Order
1050.1E, Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures. The need to
prepare a federal EIS was primarily
based on Los Angeles World Airports
Draft Master Plan for Ontario that
included the proposed relocation and
increased separation of the runways,
new taxiway, additional terminals,
aircraft gates, and expansion and/or
relocation of parking lots, access roads,
ground transportation center, airport
maintenance area, administrative
facility and aircraft rescue and
firefighting facility. Los Angeles World
SUMMARY:
Airports, as the owner and operator of
Ontario international Airport has
notified the FAA of their decision to
discontinue pursuit of the draft master
plan at this time. If and when Los
Angeles World Airports decides to
resume preparation of a Master Plan, the
FAA will evaluate the proposed
improvements to ensure compliance
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, as amended.
Agency Information Collection
Activities
Federal Railroad
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of OMB approvals.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and 5 CFR
1320.5(b), this notice announces that
new information collections
requirements (ICRs) listed below have
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). These
new ICRs pertain to 49 CFR parts 227
and 229. Additionally, FRA hereby
announces that other ICRs listed below
have been re-approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). These
ICRs pertain to parts 207, 209, 210, 214,
215, 217, 218, 223, 228, 232, 233, 234,
235, and 236. The OMB approval
numbers, titles, and expiration dates are
included herein under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Robert Brogan, Office of Planning and
Evaluation Division, RRS–21, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont
Ave., NW., Mail Stop 25, Washington,
DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6292),
or Gina Christodoulou, Office of
Support Systems, RAD–43, Federal
Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont
Ave., NW., Mail Stop 35, Washington,
DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6139).
(These telephone numbers are not tollfree.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law No. 104–13, § 2, 109
Stat. 163 (1995) (codified as revised at
44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), and its
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74573
1320, require Federal agencies to
display OMB control numbers and
inform respondents of their legal
significance once OMB approval is
obtained. The following new FRA
information collection was approved in
the last two months: OMB No. 2130–
0560, Use of Locomotive Horns at
Highway Grade Crossings (49 CFR parts
227 and 229) (Amendments to Final
Rule). The expiration date for this
collection of information is October 31,
2009.
The following information collections
were re-approved: (1) OMB No. 2130–
0017, U.S. DOT Crossing Inventory
Form (Form FRA F 6180.71). The new
expiration date for this information
collection is August 31, 2009. (2) OMB
No. 2130–0506, Identification of Cars
Moved in Accordance with Order 13528
(49 CFR part 232). The new expiration
date for this information collection is
March 31, 2009. (3) OMB No. 2130–
0035, Railroad Operating Rules (49 CFR
part 217). The new expiration date for
this information collection is September
30, 2009. (4) OMB No. 2130–0502,
Filing of Dedicated Cars (49 CFR 215).
The new expiration date for this
information collection is September 30,
2009. (5) OMB No. 2130–0519, Bad
Order and Home Shop Card (49 CFR
part 215). The new expiration date for
this information collection is September
30, 2009. (6) OMB No. 2130–0520,
Stenciling Reporting Mark on Freight
Cars (49 CFR part 215). The new
expiration date for this information
collection is September 30, 2009. (7)
OMB No. 2130–0523, Rear End Marking
Devices (49 CFR part 223). The new
expiration date for this information
collection is September 30, 2009. (8)
OMB No. 2130–0527, Locomotive
Certification (Noise Compliance
Regulations) (49 CFR part 210). The new
expiration date for this information
collection is September 30, 2009. (9)
OMB No. 2130–0534, Grade Crossing
Signal System Safety (49 CFR part 234)
(Form FRA F 6180.83). The new
expiration date for this information
collection is September 30, 2009. (10)
OMB No. 2130–0535, Bridge Worker
Safety Rules (49 CFR 214). The new
expiration date for this information
collection is September 30, 2009. (11)
OMB No. 2130–0537, Railroad Police
Officers (49 CFR part 207). The new
expiration date for this information
collection is September 30, 2009. (12)
OMB No. 2130–0568, FRA Emergency
Order No. 24. The new expiration date
for this information collection is August
31, 2009. (13) OMB No. 2130–0006,
Railroad Signal System Requirements
(49 CFR 233/235/236) (Forms FRA F
E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM
12DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 238 (Tuesday, December 12, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74572-74573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9627]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Cancellation of Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement for
Sacramento International Airport, Sacramento, Sacramento County, CA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of cancellation of preparation of Environmental Impact
Statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces that it
has discontinued preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for a proposed runway extension project and other associated
development at Sacramento International Airport, Sacramento,
California. The FAA is doing this because Sacramento County, the owner
and operator of the airport, is deferring its proposed runway extension
project to a long-term planning horizon (2020). As a result, FAA has
determined the runway extension proposal at Sacramento International
airport is not ripe for decision at this time.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Camille Garibaldi, Environmental
Protection Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, San Francisco
Airports District Office, 831 Mitten Road, Burlingame, California
94010; telephone: 650/876-2778 extension 613.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 9, 2005, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) issued a Notice of Intent in the Federal Register
(70 FR 46260-46261) to prepare an EIS for future development at
Sacramento International Airport, Sacramento, California. The FAA based
its decision to prepare the EIS on the procedures described in FAA
Order 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures. FAA also
based its decision to prepare a federal EIS primarily on Sacramento
County's proposal to extend Runway 16L/34R to a total length of 11,000
feet. Sacramento County, owner and operator of Sacramento International
Airport, notified the FAA, by letter dated September 5, 2006, of the
County's decision to withdraw its request for FAA consideration of the
proposed extension to Runway 16L/34R at this time. The County will
provide FAA with a revised list of proposed improvements to Sacramento
International Airport. When FAA receives the County's revised list of
proposed improvements and a suggested implementation schedule, FAA
will:
Evaluate each of the proposed improvements:
Decide if Sacramento County has completed sufficient
planning to enable FAA to meaningfully evaluate the potential
environmental effects of those improvements;
Determine the NEPA document necessary to assess the
environmental effects of those improvements pursuant to FAA Order
5050.4B, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Implementing
Instructions for Airport Actions; and
Suggest a schedule for completing the necessary NEPA
process.
[[Page 74573]]
Issued in Hawthorne, California on December 1, 2006.
Mark A. McClardy,
Manager, Airports Division, Western-Pacific Region, AWP-600.
[FR Doc. 06-9627 Filed 12-11-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M