Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Limited PC-12 and PC-12/45 Airplanes, 71497-71499 [E6-20971]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
Related Information
(h) To get copies of the service information
referenced in this AD, contact Raytheon
Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 85, Wichita,
Kansas 67201–0085; telephone: (800) 429–
5372 or (316) 676–3140. To view the AD
docket, go to the Docket Management
Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC, or on the
Internet at https://dms.dot.gov. The docket
number is Docket No. FAA–2006–26075;
Directorate Identifier 2006–CE–55–AD.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
December 4, 2006.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–20970 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26371; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–70–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus
Aircraft Limited PC–12 and PC–12/45
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as executive seats equipped
with pedestal legs that were produced
using a material that deviates from the
approved design data. The proposed AD
would require actions that are intended
to address the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 10, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:58 Dec 08, 2006
Jkt 211001
71497
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, 901
Locust, Room 301; telephone (816) 329–
4059; fax (816) 329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
The Federal Office of Civil Aviation
(FOCA), which is the aviation authority
for Switzerland, has issued FOCA AD
HB–2006–444, dated November 7, 2006
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states
that executive seats equipped with
pedestal legs were produced using a
material that deviates from the approved
design data. As a consequence the
pedestal legs may not perform as
intended under emergency landing
conditions. In order to correct and
control the situation, this AD requires a
one time inspection to identify the
Vendor Part Number (VPN) of the
pedestal legs and the Serial Number
(S/N) of the executive seat and the
replacement of the pedestal legs if
necessary. You may obtain further
information by examining the MCAI in
the AD docket.
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new
process for streamlining the issuance of
ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined
process will allow us to adopt MCAI
safety requirements in a more efficient
manner and will reduce safety risks to
the public. This process continues to
follow all FAA AD issuance processes to
meet legal, economic, Administrative
Procedure Act, and Federal Register
requirements. We also continue to meet
our technical decision-making
responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated
products.
This proposed AD references the
MCAI and related service information
that we considered in forming the
engineering basis to correct the unsafe
condition. The proposed AD contains
text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain
language principles.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2006–26371; Directorate Identifier
2006–CE–70–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Relevant Service Information
Pilatus Aircraft Limited has issued
Service Bulletin No.: 25–032, dated
October 2, 2006, and DeCrane Aircraft
Seating Company, Inc. has issued
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB05147
Revision B, dated June 26, 2006. The
actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
71498
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the
proposed AD. These requirements, if
ultimately adopted, will take
precedence over the actions copied from
the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 394 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 0.5 work-hours per product
to comply with the inspection
requirement of the proposed AD. In
addition, we estimate this proposed AD
would affect about 59 seats and take
about 1 work-hour per seat to comply
with the parts replacement requirement
of the proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Where the
service information lists required parts
costs that are covered under warranty,
we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these costs. As we do not
control warranty coverage for affected
parties, some parties may incur costs
higher than estimated here. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$15,760, or $40 per product for
inspection and $4,720, or $80 per seat
for parts replacement.
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
14:58 Dec 08, 2006
Jkt 211001
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, Under the Authority
Delegated to Me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Authority for This Rulemaking
VerDate Aug<31>2005
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Pilatus Aircraft Limited: Docket No. FAA–
2006–26371; Directorate Identifier 2006–
CE–70–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January
10, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to PC–12 and PC–12/
45 airplanes, serial numbers 101 through 683,
that are:
(1) Certificated in any category; and
(2) Equipped with executive passenger
seats Model Number 4006 manufactured by
DeCrane Aircraft Seating Company, Inc.
Vendor Part Number (VPN) 403150–1 or
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
403150–2 with Serial Numbers (S/N)
identified in DeCrane Aircraft Mandatory
Service Bulletin SB05147 Revision B, dated
June 26, 2006.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states that
executive seats equipped with pedestal legs
were produced using a material that deviates
from the approved design data. As a
consequence the pedestal legs may not
perform as intended under emergency
landing conditions. In order to correct and
control the situation, this AD requires a one
time inspection to identify the VPN of the
pedestal legs and the S/N of the executive
seat and the replacement of the pedestal legs
if necessary.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
(1) Within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD:
(i) Perform an inspection to identify the
VPN of the pedestal legs and the S/N of the
executive seat following the accomplishment
instructions in Pilatus PC–12 Service
Bulletin No.: 25–032, dated October 2, 2006.
(ii) If during the inspection required by
paragraph (e)(1)(i) of this AD any pedestal
legs with a VPN and executive seats with a
S/N which correspond with the data in
DeCrane Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin
SB05147 Revision B, dated June 26, 2006 are
found, prior to further flight, replace the
affected pedestal legs following the
accomplishment instructions in Pilatus PC–
12 Service Bulletin No.: 25–032, dated
October 2, 2006, with new pedestal legs with
VPN 431005–17 and 431005–18. The
removed parts must be returned to Pilatus.
(2) As of the effective date of this AD, no
person shall install any executive seats
model number 4006 produced by DeCrane
Aircraft Seating Company, Inc., VPN 403150–
1 or 403150–2 with S/Ns identified in
DeCrane Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin
SB05147 Revision B, dated June 26, 2006, on
any Pilatus Models PC–12 and PC–12/45
airplane, unless the mandatory actions of this
AD have been implemented.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/
or service information as follows: No
differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(f) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Staff,
FAA, ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816)
329–4090, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 2006 / Proposed Rules
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(g) Refer to Federal Office of Civil Aviation
(FOCA) AD HB–2006–444, dated November
7, 2006; Pilatus Aircraft Limited Service
Bulletin No.: 25–032, dated October 2, 2006;
and DeCrane Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB05147 Revision B, dated June 26,
2006, for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
December 4, 2006.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–20971 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2006–26285; Directorate
Identifier 2006–CE–69–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pacific
Aerospace Corporation Ltd Model
750XL Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as possible undersize rivets in
the fuselage roof at STN 180.85, BL
19.67, WL 86.2. The proposed AD
would require actions that are intended
to address the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 10, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• DOT Docket Web Site: Go to
https://dms.dot.gov and follow the
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:58 Dec 08, 2006
Jkt 211001
instructions for sending your comments
electronically.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://dms.dot.gov; or in
person at the Docket Management
Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647–
5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4146; fax: (816)
329–4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new
process for streamlining the issuance of
ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined
process will allow us to adopt MCAI
safety requirements in a more efficient
manner and will reduce safety risks to
the public. This process continues to
follow all FAA AD issuance processes to
meet legal, economic, Administrative
Procedure Act, and Federal Register
requirements. We also continue to meet
our technical decision-making
responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated
products.
This proposed AD references the
MCAI and related service information
that we considered in forming the
engineering basis to correct the unsafe
condition. The proposed AD contains
text copied from the MCAI and for this
reason might not follow our plain
language principles.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
71499
section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2006–26285; Directorate Identifier
2006–CE–69–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
ADDRESSES
Discussion
The Civil Aviation Authority (CAA),
which is the aviation authority for New
Zealand, has issued CAA AD DCA/
750XL/8, Drafted: May 9, 2006; Effective
Date: August 31, 2006 (referred to after
this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products.
The MCAI states the finding of the
possible installation of undersize rivets
in the fuselage roof at STN 180.85, BL
19.67, WL 86.2. The MCAI requires that
you inspect the rivets in the fuselage
roof at STN 180.85, BL 19.67, WL 86.2,
and replace undersize rivets. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Pacific Aerospace Corporation Ltd has
issued PAC Pacific Aerospace
Corporation Mandatory Service Bulletin
PACSB/XL/019, Date Issued: April 21,
2006. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71497-71499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20971]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2006-26371; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-70-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Limited PC-12 and PC-
12/45 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as executive seats equipped with pedestal legs that were
produced using a material that deviates from the approved design data.
The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 10,
2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
DOT Docket Web Site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, 901
Locust, Room 301; telephone (816) 329-4059; fax (816) 329-4090.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Streamlined Issuance of AD
The FAA is implementing a new process for streamlining the issuance
of ADs related to MCAI. The streamlined process will allow us to adopt
MCAI safety requirements in a more efficient manner and will reduce
safety risks to the public. This process continues to follow all FAA AD
issuance processes to meet legal, economic, Administrative Procedure
Act, and Federal Register requirements. We also continue to meet our
technical decision-making responsibilities to identify and correct
unsafe conditions on U.S.-certificated products.
This proposed AD references the MCAI and related service
information that we considered in forming the engineering basis to
correct the unsafe condition. The proposed AD contains text copied from
the MCAI and for this reason might not follow our plain language
principles.
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2006-
26371; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-70-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://
dms.dot.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will
also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA), which is the aviation
authority for Switzerland, has issued FOCA AD HB-2006-444, dated
November 7, 2006 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct
an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states that
executive seats equipped with pedestal legs were produced using a
material that deviates from the approved design data. As a consequence
the pedestal legs may not perform as intended under emergency landing
conditions. In order to correct and control the situation, this AD
requires a one time inspection to identify the Vendor Part Number (VPN)
of the pedestal legs and the Serial Number (S/N) of the executive seat
and the replacement of the pedestal legs if necessary. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Pilatus Aircraft Limited has issued Service Bulletin No.: 25-032,
dated October 2, 2006, and DeCrane Aircraft Seating Company, Inc. has
issued Mandatory Service Bulletin SB05147 Revision B, dated June 26,
2006. The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI or Service
Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
[[Page 71498]]
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
described in a separate paragraph of the proposed AD. These
requirements, if ultimately adopted, will take precedence over the
actions copied from the MCAI.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 394 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 0.5 work-hours per product to comply with the
inspection requirement of the proposed AD. In addition, we estimate
this proposed AD would affect about 59 seats and take about 1 work-hour
per seat to comply with the parts replacement requirement of the
proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Where the
service information lists required parts costs that are covered under
warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these costs.
As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties, some
parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $15,760, or $40 per product for inspection and $4,720, or $80 per
seat for parts replacement.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, Under the Authority Delegated to Me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Pilatus Aircraft Limited: Docket No. FAA-2006-26371; Directorate
Identifier 2006-CE-70-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by January 10, 2007.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to PC-12 and PC-12/45 airplanes, serial
numbers 101 through 683, that are:
(1) Certificated in any category; and
(2) Equipped with executive passenger seats Model Number 4006
manufactured by DeCrane Aircraft Seating Company, Inc. Vendor Part
Number (VPN) 403150-1 or 403150-2 with Serial Numbers (S/N)
identified in DeCrane Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB05147
Revision B, dated June 26, 2006.
Reason
(d) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states that executive seats equipped with pedestal legs were
produced using a material that deviates from the approved design
data. As a consequence the pedestal legs may not perform as intended
under emergency landing conditions. In order to correct and control
the situation, this AD requires a one time inspection to identify
the VPN of the pedestal legs and the S/N of the executive seat and
the replacement of the pedestal legs if necessary.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following actions.
(1) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD:
(i) Perform an inspection to identify the VPN of the pedestal
legs and the S/N of the executive seat following the accomplishment
instructions in Pilatus PC-12 Service Bulletin No.: 25-032, dated
October 2, 2006.
(ii) If during the inspection required by paragraph (e)(1)(i) of
this AD any pedestal legs with a VPN and executive seats with a S/N
which correspond with the data in DeCrane Aircraft Mandatory Service
Bulletin SB05147 Revision B, dated June 26, 2006 are found, prior to
further flight, replace the affected pedestal legs following the
accomplishment instructions in Pilatus PC-12 Service Bulletin No.:
25-032, dated October 2, 2006, with new pedestal legs with VPN
431005-17 and 431005-18. The removed parts must be returned to
Pilatus.
(2) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install
any executive seats model number 4006 produced by DeCrane Aircraft
Seating Company, Inc., VPN 403150-1 or 403150-2 with S/Ns identified
in DeCrane Aircraft Mandatory Service Bulletin SB05147 Revision B,
dated June 26, 2006, on any Pilatus Models PC-12 and PC-12/45
airplane, unless the mandatory actions of this AD have been
implemented.
FAA AD Differences
Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(f) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Staff, FAA, ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they
[[Page 71499]]
are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before
it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
approved the information collection requirements and has assigned
OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Related Information
(g) Refer to Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) AD HB-2006-
444, dated November 7, 2006; Pilatus Aircraft Limited Service
Bulletin No.: 25-032, dated October 2, 2006; and DeCrane Aircraft
Mandatory Service Bulletin SB05147 Revision B, dated June 26, 2006,
for related information.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on December 4, 2006.
John R. Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-20971 Filed 12-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P