Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; Redesignation of the Portland, Maine and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine Ozone Nonattainment Areas to Attainment and Approval of These Areas' Maintenance Plans, 71489-71491 [E6-20901]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule.
PART 52—[AMENDED]
ACTION:
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a
redesignation request and a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maine. The
Maine Department of Environmental
Protection (ME DEP) is requesting that
the Portland, Maine and the Hancock,
Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties,
Maine (also known as the Midcoast
area) ozone nonattainment areas be
redesignated as attainment for the 8hour ozone national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS). In conjunction with
its redesignation request, the ME DEP
submitted a SIP revision consisting of
maintenance plans for the Portland,
Maine and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln
and Waldo Counties, Maine areas that
provide for continued attainment of the
8-hour ozone NAAQS for the next 10
years. EPA is approving the
redesignation requests and the
maintenance plan as revisions to the
Maine SIP in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act. EPA
is also approving the motor vehicle
emission budgets (MVEBs) that are
identified in the 8-hour maintenance
plan for these areas for purposes of
transportation conformity.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective on January 10, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR–
2006–OAR–0226. All documents in the
docket are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
New England Regional Office, One
Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston,
MA. EPA requests that if at all possible,
you contact the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding legal holidays. Copies of the
documents relevant to this action are
also available for public inspection
during normal business hours, by
appointment at the Bureau of Air
Quality Control, Department of
Environmental Protection, First Floor of
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart DD—Nevada
2. Section 52.1470 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(56)(i) (A)(5), (6),
and (7) to read as follows:
I
§ 52.1470
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(56) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(5) The following sections of the
Nevada Air Quality Regulations were
adopted on the dates listed below and
recodified as Chapter 445B of the
Nevada Administrative Code in
November 1994:
(i) September 16, 1976: 445B.134,
445B.257, 445B.258, 445B.259,
445B.260, 445B.261, and 445B.263.
(6) The following sections of Chapter
445 of the Nevada Administrative Code
were adopted on the dates listed below
and recodified as Chapter 445B of the
Nevada Administrative Code in
November 1994:
(i) April 26, 1984: 445B.265.
(ii) November 3, 1993: 445B.084.
(iii) March 3, 1994: 445B.202.
(7) The following sections of Chapter
445B of the Nevada Administrative
Code were adopted on the dates listed
below:
(i) October 3, 1995: 445B.015,
445B.062, and 445B.256.
(ii) August 22, 2000: 445B.264.
(iii) September 18, 2003: 445B.262
and 445B.267.
(iv) October 4, 2005: 445B.063,
445B.153, and 445B.22093.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–20895 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
[EPA–R01–OAR–2006–OAR–0226; FRL–
8253–4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Maine;
Redesignation of the Portland, Maine
and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and
Waldo Counties, Maine Ozone
Nonattainment Areas to Attainment
and Approval of These Areas’
Maintenance Plans
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Dec 08, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71489
the Tyson Building, Augusta Mental
Health Institute Complex, Augusta, ME
04333–0017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard P. Burkhart, Air Quality
Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street,
Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA 02114–
2023, telephone number (617) 918–
1664, fax number (617) 918–0664, email Burkhart.Richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 60937),
EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Maine.
The NPR proposed approval of Maine’s
request to redesignate the Portland,
Maine and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln
and Waldo Counties, Maine 8-hour
ozone nonattainment areas and a SIP
revision that establishes separate
maintenance plans for these areas. The
maintenance plans set forth how each
area will maintain attainment of the 8hour ozone NAAQS for the next 10
years in accordance with Section 175A
of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The NPR
also proposed approval of the motor
vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs)
associated with the maintenance plans.
The formal SIP revision was submitted
by the ME DEP on August 3, 2006. Other
specific requirements of Maine’s
redesignation requests, the 175A
maintenance plans, and the MVEBs, and
the rationale for EPA’s proposed action
are explained in the NPR and will not
be restated here. No adverse public
comments were received on the NPR,
however, two commenters did discover
minor typographical errors in the NPR.
EPA agrees with these commenters that
there were typographical errors in the
NPR. Some of the values for monitored
ozone levels were misstated in two
tables in the NPR. These misstatements
were minor, and did not affect EPA’s
conclusions on the redesignation
requests, that the design values for these
areas qualify for redesignation. A
response to comments document
correcting the record was placed into
the docket for this action.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the State of Maine’s
August 3, 2006 redesignation requests
and maintenance plans for the Portland,
Maine and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln
and Waldo Counties, Maine areas,
because the requirements for approval
have been satisfied for each area. EPA
has evaluated Maine’s redesignation
requests, and determined that they meet
the redesignation criteria set forth in
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
71490
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Clean Air
Act. EPA believes that the redesignation
requests and monitoring data
demonstrate that the Portland, Maine
and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and
Waldo Counties, Maine areas have
attained the 8-hour ozone standard. The
final approval of this redesignation
request will change the designation of
the Portland, Maine and the Hancock,
Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties,
Maine area from nonattainment to
attainment for the 8-hour ozone
standard. EPA is approving the
associated maintenance plans for these
areas, submitted on August 3, 2006, as
a revision to the Maine SIP. EPA is
approving the maintenance plans for the
Portland, Maine and the Hancock, Knox,
Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine
area because they meet the requirements
of section 175A of the CAA. EPA is also
approving the MVEBs associated with
these maintenance plans.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Dec 08, 2006
Jkt 211001
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
approves a state rule implementing a
federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 9, 2007.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: November 30, 2006.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended
as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart U—Maine
2. Section 52.1023 is amended by
adding paragraphs (g) and (h) to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.1023
Control strategy: Ozone.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Approval. EPA is approving a
redesignation request for the Portland,
Maine 8-hour ozone nonattainment area.
Maine submitted this request on August
3, 2006. The request contains the
required Clean Air Act Section 175A
maintenance plan. The plan establishes
motor vehicle emissions budgets for
2016 of 16.659 tons per summer day
(tpsd) of volatile organic compound and
32.837 tpsd of nitrogen oxide (NOX) to
be used in transportation conformity
determinations in the Portland area.
(h) Approval. EPA is approving a
redesignation request for the Hancock,
Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties,
Maine 8-hour ozone nonattainment area.
Maine submitted this request on August
3, 2006. The request contains the
required Clean Air Act Section 175A
maintenance plan. The plan establishes
motor vehicle emissions budgets for
2016 of 3.763 tons per summer day
(tpsd) of volatile organic compound and
6.245 tpsd of nitrogen oxide (NOX) to be
used in transportation conformity
determinations in the Hancock, Knox,
Lincoln and Waldo Counties area.
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
71491
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 237 / Monday, December 11, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
2. Section 81.320 is amended by
revising the entries for the Portland,
Maine and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln
and Waldo Counties, Maine area in the
I
PART 81—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
8-hour ozone standard table to read as
follows:
§ 81.320
*
*
Maine.
*
*
*
MAINE—OZONE (8-HOUR STANDARD)
Designation a
Category/classification
Designated area
Date 1
Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Cos., ME:
Hancock County (part) (includes only the following
cities and towns): Bar Harbor, Blue Hill, Brooklin,
Brooksville,
Cranberry
Isle,
Deer
Isle,
Frenchboro, Gouldsboro, Hancock, Lamoine,
Mount Desert, Sedgwick, Sorrento, Southwest
Harbor, Stonington, Sullivan, Surry, Swans Island, Tremont, Trenton, and Winter Harbor.
Knox County (part) (includes only the following cities and towns): Camden, Criehaven, Cushing,
Friendship, Isle au Haut, Matinicus Isle, Muscle
Ridge Shoals, North Haven, Owls Head, Rockland, Rockport, St. George, South Thomaston,
Thomaston, Vinalhaven, and Warren.
Lincoln County (part) (includes only the following
cities and towns): Alna, Boothbay, Boothbay
Harbor, Breman, Bristol, Damariscotta, Dresden,
Edgecomb, Monhegan, Newcastle, Nobleboro,
South Bristol, Southport, Waldoboro, Westport,
and Wiscasset.
Waldo County (part) (includes only the following
town): Islesboro.
Portland, ME:
Androscoggin County (part) (includes only the following town): Durham.
Cumberland County (part) (includes only the following cities and towns): Brunswick, Cape Elizabeth, Casco, Cumberland, Falmouth, Freeport,
Frye Island, Gorham, Gray, Harpswell, Long Island, New Gloucester, North Yarmouth, Portland, Pownal, Raymond, Scarborough, South
Portland, Standish, Westbrook, Windham, and
Yarmouth.
Sagadahoc County (includes all cities & towns) .....
York County (part) (includes only the following cities and towns): Alfred, Arundel, Berwick, Biddeford, Buxton, Dayton, Elliot, Hollis, Kennebunk,
Kennebunkport, Kittery, Limington, Lyman, North
Berwick, Ogunquit, Old Orchard Beach, Saco,
Sanford, South Berwick, Wells, and York.
*
*
Date 1
Type
January 10, 2007 ...
Attainment.
January 10, 2007 ...
Attainment.
January 10, 2007 ...
Attainment.
January 10, 2007 ...
Attainment.
January 10, 2007 ...
Attainment.
January 10, 2007 ...
Attainment.
January 10, 2007 ...
January 10, 2007 ...
Attainment.
Attainment.
*
*
*
*
a Includes
1 This
*
*
Indian country located in each county or area, except otherwise specified.
date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–20901 Filed 12–8–06; 8:45 am]
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:32 Dec 08, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Type
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\11DER1.SGM
11DER1
*
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 237 (Monday, December 11, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71489-71491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20901]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R01-OAR-2006-OAR-0226; FRL-8253-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maine; Redesignation of the Portland, Maine and the Hancock, Knox,
Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine Ozone Nonattainment Areas to
Attainment and Approval of These Areas' Maintenance Plans
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a redesignation request and a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maine. The
Maine Department of Environmental Protection (ME DEP) is requesting
that the Portland, Maine and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo
Counties, Maine (also known as the Midcoast area) ozone nonattainment
areas be redesignated as attainment for the 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). In conjunction with its
redesignation request, the ME DEP submitted a SIP revision consisting
of maintenance plans for the Portland, Maine and the Hancock, Knox,
Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine areas that provide for continued
attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the next 10 years. EPA is
approving the redesignation requests and the maintenance plan as
revisions to the Maine SIP in accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act. EPA is also approving the motor vehicle emission budgets
(MVEBs) that are identified in the 8-hour maintenance plan for these
areas for purposes of transportation conformity.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on January 10, 2007.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R01-OAR-2006-OAR-0226. All documents in the
docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Office of
Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New
England Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100, Boston, MA.
EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding legal holidays. Copies of the
documents relevant to this action are also available for public
inspection during normal business hours, by appointment at the Bureau
of Air Quality Control, Department of Environmental Protection, First
Floor of the Tyson Building, Augusta Mental Health Institute Complex,
Augusta, ME 04333-0017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard P. Burkhart, Air Quality
Planning Unit, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, One Congress Street, Suite 1100 (CAQ), Boston, MA
02114-2023, telephone number (617) 918-1664, fax number (617) 918-0664,
e-mail Burkhart.Richard@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 17, 2006 (71 FR 60937), EPA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPR) for the State of Maine. The NPR proposed
approval of Maine's request to redesignate the Portland, Maine and the
Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine 8-hour ozone
nonattainment areas and a SIP revision that establishes separate
maintenance plans for these areas. The maintenance plans set forth how
each area will maintain attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the
next 10 years in accordance with Section 175A of the Clean Air Act
(CAA). The NPR also proposed approval of the motor vehicle emission
budgets (MVEBs) associated with the maintenance plans. The formal SIP
revision was submitted by the ME DEP on August 3, 2006. Other specific
requirements of Maine's redesignation requests, the 175A maintenance
plans, and the MVEBs, and the rationale for EPA's proposed action are
explained in the NPR and will not be restated here. No adverse public
comments were received on the NPR, however, two commenters did discover
minor typographical errors in the NPR. EPA agrees with these commenters
that there were typographical errors in the NPR. Some of the values for
monitored ozone levels were misstated in two tables in the NPR. These
misstatements were minor, and did not affect EPA's conclusions on the
redesignation requests, that the design values for these areas qualify
for redesignation. A response to comments document correcting the
record was placed into the docket for this action.
II. Final Action
EPA is approving the State of Maine's August 3, 2006 redesignation
requests and maintenance plans for the Portland, Maine and the Hancock,
Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine areas, because the requirements
for approval have been satisfied for each area. EPA has evaluated
Maine's redesignation requests, and determined that they meet the
redesignation criteria set forth in
[[Page 71490]]
section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Clean Air Act. EPA believes that the
redesignation requests and monitoring data demonstrate that the
Portland, Maine and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties,
Maine areas have attained the 8-hour ozone standard. The final approval
of this redesignation request will change the designation of the
Portland, Maine and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties,
Maine area from nonattainment to attainment for the 8-hour ozone
standard. EPA is approving the associated maintenance plans for these
areas, submitted on August 3, 2006, as a revision to the Maine SIP. EPA
is approving the maintenance plans for the Portland, Maine and the
Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine area because they meet
the requirements of section 175A of the CAA. EPA is also approving the
MVEBs associated with these maintenance plans.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it merely approves a state rule
implementing a federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 9, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: November 30, 2006.
Robert W. Varney,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
0
40 CFR parts 52 and 81 are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart U--Maine
0
2. Section 52.1023 is amended by adding paragraphs (g) and (h) to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1023 Control strategy: Ozone.
* * * * *
(g) Approval. EPA is approving a redesignation request for the
Portland, Maine 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. Maine submitted this
request on August 3, 2006. The request contains the required Clean Air
Act Section 175A maintenance plan. The plan establishes motor vehicle
emissions budgets for 2016 of 16.659 tons per summer day (tpsd) of
volatile organic compound and 32.837 tpsd of nitrogen oxide
(NOX) to be used in transportation conformity determinations
in the Portland area.
(h) Approval. EPA is approving a redesignation request for the
Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area. Maine submitted this request on August 3, 2006. The
request contains the required Clean Air Act Section 175A maintenance
plan. The plan establishes motor vehicle emissions budgets for 2016 of
3.763 tons per summer day (tpsd) of volatile organic compound and 6.245
tpsd of nitrogen oxide (NOX) to be used in transportation
conformity determinations in the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo
Counties area.
[[Page 71491]]
PART 81--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. Section 81.320 is amended by revising the entries for the Portland,
Maine and the Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo Counties, Maine area in
the 8-hour ozone standard table to read as follows:
Sec. 81.320 Maine.
* * * * *
Maine--Ozone (8-Hour Standard)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation \a\ Category/classification
Designated area -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date \1\ Type Date \1\ Type
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hancock, Knox, Lincoln and Waldo
Cos., ME:
Hancock County (part) January 10, 2007............ Attainment..................
(includes only the
following cities and
towns): Bar Harbor, Blue
Hill, Brooklin,
Brooksville, Cranberry
Isle, Deer Isle,
Frenchboro, Gouldsboro,
Hancock, Lamoine, Mount
Desert, Sedgwick, Sorrento,
Southwest Harbor,
Stonington, Sullivan,
Surry, Swans Island,
Tremont, Trenton, and
Winter Harbor.
Knox County (part) (includes January 10, 2007............ Attainment..................
only the following cities
and towns): Camden,
Criehaven, Cushing,
Friendship, Isle au Haut,
Matinicus Isle, Muscle
Ridge Shoals, North Haven,
Owls Head, Rockland,
Rockport, St. George, South
Thomaston, Thomaston,
Vinalhaven, and Warren.
Lincoln County (part) January 10, 2007............ Attainment..................
(includes only the
following cities and
towns): Alna, Boothbay,
Boothbay Harbor, Breman,
Bristol, Damariscotta,
Dresden, Edgecomb,
Monhegan, Newcastle,
Nobleboro, South Bristol,
Southport, Waldoboro,
Westport, and Wiscasset.
Waldo County (part) January 10, 2007............ Attainment..................
(includes only the
following town): Islesboro.
Portland, ME:
Androscoggin County (part) January 10, 2007............ Attainment..................
(includes only the
following town): Durham.
Cumberland County (part) January 10, 2007............ Attainment..................
(includes only the
following cities and
towns): Brunswick, Cape
Elizabeth, Casco,
Cumberland, Falmouth,
Freeport, Frye Island,
Gorham, Gray, Harpswell,
Long Island, New
Gloucester, North Yarmouth,
Portland, Pownal, Raymond,
Scarborough, South
Portland, Standish,
Westbrook, Windham, and
Yarmouth.
Sagadahoc County (includes January 10, 2007............ Attainment..................
all cities & towns).
York County (part) (includes January 10, 2007............ Attainment..................
only the following cities
and towns): Alfred,
Arundel, Berwick,
Biddeford, Buxton, Dayton,
Elliot, Hollis, Kennebunk,
Kennebunkport, Kittery,
Limington, Lyman, North
Berwick, Ogunquit, Old
Orchard Beach, Saco,
Sanford, South Berwick,
Wells, and York.
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Includes Indian country located in each county or area, except otherwise specified.
\1\ This date is June 15, 2004, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-20901 Filed 12-8-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P