Incidental Takes of Marine Mammals During Specified Activities; Black Abalone Research Surveys at San Nicolas Island, Ventura County, CA, 71136-71142 [E6-20950]
Download as PDF
71136
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf)
establishes minimum peer review
standards for influential scientific
information that Federal agencies intend
to disseminate. The Peer Review
Bulletin also directs Federal agencies to
adopt or adapt the National Academy of
Sciences (NAS) policy for evaluating
conflicts of interest when selecting peer
reviewers who are not Federal
government employees (federal
employees are subject to Federal ethics
requirements). For peer review
purposes, the term ‘‘conflicts of
interest’’ means any financial or other
interest which conflicts with the service
of the individual because it could: (1)
Significantly impair the individual’s
objectivity; or (2) create an unfair
competitive advantage for any person or
organization.
NOAA has adapted the NAS policy
and developed two confidential conflict
disclosure forms which the agency will
use to examine prospective reviewers’
potential financial conflicts and other
interests that could impair objectivity or
create an unfair advantage. One form is
for peer reviewers of studies related to
government regulation and the other
form is for all other influential scientific
information subject to the Peer Review
Bulletin. The forms include questions
about employment as well as
investment and property interests and
research funding. Both forms also
require the submission of curriculum
vitae.
NOAA is seeking to collect this
information from potential peer
reviewers who are not government
employees when conducting a peer
review pursuant to the PRB. The
number of peer reviews conducted
pursuant to the PRB each year will vary,
but for illustrative purposes, NOAA
currently has thirty-nine peer review
plans posted on the Department of
Commerce Peer Review Agenda,
indicating that for a six-month period in
FY 2006, thirty-nine agency reports had
recently been completed, were presently
undergoing, or were planning to begin
peer review. The information collected
in the conflict of interest disclosure is
essential to NOAA’s compliance with
the OMB PRB, and helps to ensure that
government studies are reviewed by
independent, impartial peer reviewers.
II. Method of Collection
Forms may be downloaded from the
Internet and are fillable and signable
electronically or manually. They may be
submitted, along with the Curriculum
Vitae, via e-mail or regular mail.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
300.
Estimated Time per Response: 30
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 150.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 5, 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–20882 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 101706E]
Incidental Takes of Marine Mammals
During Specified Activities; Black
Abalone Research Surveys at San
Nicolas Island, Ventura County, CA
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) regulations, notification is
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization
(IHA) to Dr. Glenn VanBlaricom (Dr.
VanBlaricom) for the take of marine
mammals, by Level B harassment only,
incidental to the assessment of black
abalone populations at San Nicolas
Island (SNI), CA.
DATES: Effective from December 1, 2006,
through November 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the IHA and the
application are available by writing to
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation, and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225, or by telephoning the
contact listed here. A copy of the
application containing a list of
references used in this document may
be obtained by writing to this address,
by telephoning the contact listed here
(FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or
online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental.htm. Documents
cited in this notice may be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business
hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie
Harrison, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext. 166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of marine mammals
by U.S. citizens who engage in a
specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization shall be granted if
NMFS finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of the
species or stock(s) for subsistence uses,
and that the permissible methods of
taking and requirements pertaining to
the mitigation, monitoring and reporting
of such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
which citizens of the United States can
apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of
marine mammals by harassment. Except
with respect to certain activities not
pertinent here, the MMPA defines
‘‘harassment’’ as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
[Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including,
but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45–
day time limit for NMFS review of an
application followed by a 30–day public
notice and comment period on any
proposed authorizations for the
incidental harassment of marine
mammals. Within 45 days of the close
of the comment period, NMFS must
either issue or deny issuance of the
authorization.
recent designation of California
populations of black abalones as a
species of concern in the context of
listing pursuant to the Endangered
Species Act (ESA). Research is done
under the auspices of the Washington
Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research
Unit, the University of Washington, and
the U.S. Navy (owner of SNI), with
additional logistical support from the
University of California, Santa Cruz.
Since the abalone are not handled or
removed in the course of the research,
neither a state nor federal permit is
needed.
Additional information on the
research is contained in the application
and is available upon request (see
ADDRESSES).
Project Description
Nine permanent abalone research
study areas are located in rocky
intertidal habitats on SNI in Ventura
County, CA. The applicant has made
106 separate field trips to SNI from
Summary of Request
September 1979 through March 2006,
participating in abalone survey work on
On August 10, 2006, NMFS received
564 different days at nine permanent
a letter from Dr. VanBlaricom, of the
study sites. Under the 2005/2006
Washington Cooperative Fish and
authorization, Dr. VanBlaricom made
Wildlife Research Unit, requesting
five different visits and conducted work
renewal of an IHA that was first issued
for 30 total days in the one year period.
to him on September 23, 2003 (68 FR
Quantitative abalone surveys on SNI
57427, October 3, 2003), and was last
began in 1981, at which point
reissued on November 30, 2005 (70 FR
permanent research sites were chosen
73732, December 13, 2005). The
based on the presence of dense patches
proposed 2006/2007 IHA was
of abalone in order to monitor changes
published, and comments solicited, on
over time in dense abalone aggregations.
October 23, 2006 (71 FR 62087). This
Research is conducted by counting
final IHA will authorize the take, by
black abalone in plots of 1 m2 (3.3 ft2)
harassment, of small numbers of
along permanent transect lines in rocky
California sea lions (Zalophus
intertidal habitats at each of the nine
californianus), Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina), and northern elephant study sites on the island. Permanent
transect lines are demarcated by
seals (Mirounga angustirostris)
stainless steel eyebolts embedded in the
incidental to research surveys
rock substrata and secured with marine
performed for the purpose of assessing
epoxy compound. Lines are placed
trends in black abalone (Haliotis
cracherodii) populations at SNI, Ventura temporarily between bolts during
surveys and are removed once surveys
County, California. The research
are completed. Survey work is done by
consists of 2 researchers, on foot,
two field biologists working on foot
counting abalone at nine permanent
(sites are accessed by hiking to water
sites (1 m2 each) on SNI twice a year,
from vehicle parked inland) and
with one brief additional visit to each
monitoring of black abalone populations
site for maintenance.
at SNI can be done only during periods
Population trend data for black
of extreme low tides. The exact date of
abalone populations have become
a visit to any given site is difficult to
important in a conservation context
predict because variation in surf height
because of: (a) the reintroduction of sea
and sea conditions can influence the
otters to SNI in 1987, raising the
safety of field biologists as well as the
possibility of conflict between otter
quality of data collected. In most years
conservation and abalone populations
survey work is done during the months
(abalones are often significant prey for
sea otters); (b) the appearance of a novel of January, February, March, July,
November, and December because of
exotic disease, abalone withering
optimal availability of low tides. All
syndrome, at SNI in 1992, resulting in
work is done during daylight hours due
dramatically increased rates of abalone
to of safety considerations.
mortality at the Island; and, (c) the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71137
During the year, each of the nine
permanent study sites at SNI will be
visited three times. Abalone surveys,
which take no more than 4 hours at each
site, are conducted during two of the
three visits to each of the nine sites. The
third, and final, visit is a maintenance
visit, which takes less than half of an
hour at each site and is used to take
measurements and make necessary
repairs to plots and is conducted in a
month when smaller numbers of
pinnipeds are present.
The affected marine mammal
populations at SNI, especially California
sea lions and northern elephant seals,
have grown substantially since the
beginning of abalone research in 1979
and have occupied an expanded
distribution on the island due to
population growth. Sites previously
accessible with no risk of marine
mammal harassment are now being
utilized by marine mammals at levels
such that approach without the
possibility of harassment is difficult. An
IHA is warranted for this study because
of the nine study sites used for the
abalone surveys, only two sites can be
occupied without the possibility of
disturbing at least one species of
pinniped.
Description of Habitat and Marine
Mammals in the Activity Area
San Nicolas is one of the eight
Channel Islands, located in the Santa
Barbara Channel off Southern
California. Nine miles long (14.5 km)
and about 3 1/2 miles (5.6 km) across at
its widest point, it is the farthest island
from the mainland, more than 60 miles
(96.6 km) offshore and about 85 miles
(136.8 km) southwest of Los Angeles,
California. SNI is owned and operated
by the U.S. Navy and is off-limits to
civilians without specific permission.
Many of the beaches in the Channel
Islands provide resting, molting or
breeding places for species of
pinnipeds. On SNI, three pinniped
species (northern elephant seal, Pacific
harbor seal, and California sea lion) can
be expected to occur on land in the
vicinity of abalone research sites either
regularly or in large numbers during
certain times of the year. In addition, a
single adult male Guadalupe fur seal
(Arctocephalus townsendi) (federally
listed as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act) was seen at
one abalone research site on two
occasions during the summer months in
the mid–1980’s. However, none have
been seen since those original sightings.
Further information on the biology and
distribution of these species and others
in the region can be found in Dr.
VanBlaricom’s application, which is
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
71138
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
available upon request (see ADDRESSES),
and the Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports, which are available
online at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
protlres/PR2/
StocklAssessmentlProgram/
individuallsars.html.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
California Sea Lions
The U.S. stock of California sea lions
extends from the U.S./Mexico border
north into Canada. Breeding areas of the
sea lion are on islands located in
southern California, western Baja
California, and the Gulf of California
and they primarily use the central
California area to feed during the nonbreeding season. Population estimates
for the U.S. stock of California sea lions,
which are based on counts conducted in
2001 and extrapolations from the
number of pups, range from a minimum
of 138,881 to an average of 244,000
animals, with a current growth rate of
5.4 to 6.1 percent per year (Carretta et
al., 2005). The California sea lion is not
listed under the ESA and the U.S. stock
is not considered depleted under the
MMPA.
California sea lions haul out at many
sites on SNI and are by far the most
common pinniped on the island. Over
the course of a year, up to 100,000 sea
lions may use SNI. Numbers of sea lions
at SNI increased by about 21 percent per
year between 1983 and 1995 (NMFS,
2003) and sea lions have recently started
occupying areas that were not formerly
used. Pupping occurs on the beaches of
SNI from mid-June to mid-July. Females
nurse their pups for about eight days
and then begin an alternating pattern of
foraging at sea vs. attending and nursing
the pup on land, which lasts for about
eight months, and sometimes up to a
year. California sea lions also haul out
at SNI during the molting period in
September, and smaller numbers of
females and juveniles haul out during
most of the year.
Pacific Harbor Seals
Harbor seals are widely distributed in
the North Atlantic and North Pacific. In
California, approximately 400–500
harbor seal haul-out sites are distributed
along the mainland and on offshore
islands, including intertidal sandbars,
rocky shores and beaches (Hanan, 1996).
A complete count of all harbor seals in
California is impossible because some
are always away from the haul-out sites.
A complete pup count (as is done for
other pinnipeds in California) is also not
possible because harbor seals are
precocious, with pups entering the
water almost immediately after birth.
Based on the most recent harbor seal
counts (2004 and 2005) and including a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
correction factor for the above, the
estimated population of harbor seals in
California is 34,233 (Caretta et al., 2005),
with an estimated minimum population
of 31,600 for the California stock of
harbor seals. Counts of harbor seals in
California showed a rapid increase from
1972 to 1990, but since 1990 there has
been no net population growth along the
mainland or the Channel Islands.
Though no formal determination of
Optimal Sustainable Population (OSP)
has been made, the decrease in the
growth rate may indicate that the
population has reached its carrying
capacity. The harbor seal is not listed
under the ESA and the California stock
is not considered depleted under the
MMPA.
Harbor seals haul out at various
sandy, cobble, and gravel beaches
around SNI and pupping occurs on the
beaches from late February to early
April, with nursing of pups extending
into May. Harbor seals may also haul
out during molting period in late
Spring, and smaller numbers haul out at
other times of year. Harbor seal
abundance increased at SNI from the
1960s until 1981, but since the average
counts have not changed significantly.
From 1982 to 1994, numbers of harbor
seals have fluctuated between 139 and
700 harbor seals based on both peak
ground counts and annual photographic
survey photos. The most recent aerial
count on SNI was of 457 harbor seals in
1994.
Northern Elephant Seals
Northern elephant seals breed and
give birth in California (U.S.) and Baja
California primarily on offshore islands,
from December to March (Stewart et al.,
1994). The California breeding stock,
which includes the animals on SNI, is
now demographically separated from
the Baja California population. Based on
trends in pup counts, northern elephant
seal colonies appeared to be increasing
in California through 2001. The
population size of northern elephant
seals in California is estimated to be
101,000 animals, with a minimum
population estimate of 60,547 (Carretta
et al., 2005). A continuous average
growth rate (though it has declined a bit
in recent years) of 8.3 percent has seen
numbers of this species increase from
100 in 1900 to the current population
size (Caretta et al., 2005). The northern
elephant seal is not listed under the
ESA and the California stock is not
considered depleted under the MMPA.
Increasing numbers of elephant seals
haul out at various sites around SNI.
Based on a pup count in 1995 that
found 6,575 pups, scientists estimated
that over 23,000 elephant seals may use
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SNI in a year (NMFS, 2003). From 1988
to 1995 the pup counts on SNI increased
at an average rate of 15.4 percent per
year, however, the growth rate of the
population as a whole seems to have
declined in recent years (NMFS, 2003).
Pupping occurs on the beaches of SNI
from January to early February, with
nursing of pups extending into March.
Northern elephant seals also haul out
during the molting periods in the spring
and summer, and smaller numbers haul
out at other times of the year.
Comments and Responses
On October 23, 2006, NMFS
published in the Federal Register a
notice of a proposed IHA for Dr.
VanBlaricom’s request to take marine
mammals incidental to conducting
black abalone research on SNI, and
requested comments regarding this
proposed IHA (See 71 FR 62087).
During the 30–day public comment
period, NMFS received one comment
from the Marine Mammal Commission
recommending NMFS issue the IHA as
proposed.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammals
Variable numbers of sea lions, harbor
seals, and elephant seals typically haul
out near seven of the nine study sites
used for abalone research, with breeding
activity occurring at four of these seven
sites. Pinnipeds likely to be affected by
abalone research activity are those that
are hauled out on land at or near study
sites.
Incidental harassment may result if
hauled animals move away from the
abalone researchers. For the purpose of
estimating numbers of pinnipeds taken
by these activities, NMFS conservatively
estimates that pinnipeds that move or
change the direction of their movement
in response to the presence of
researchers are taken by Level B
Harassment. Animals that raise their
head and look at the researcher are not
considered to have been taken.
Although marine mammals will not be
deliberately approached by abalone
survey personnel, approach may be
unavoidable if pinnipeds are hauled out
directly upon the permanent abalone
study plots. In almost all cases,
shoreline habitats near the abalone
study sites are gently sloping sandy
beaches or horizontal sandstone
platforms with unimpeded and nonhazardous access to the water. If
disturbed, hauled animals may move
toward the water without risk of
encountering significant hazards. In
these circumstances, the risk of serious
injury or death to hauled animals is very
low.
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
71139
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
The risk of marine mammal injury or
mortality associated with abalone
research increases somewhat if
disturbances occur during breeding
season, as it is possible that mothers and
dependent pups could become
separated. If separated pairs don’t
reunite fairly quickly, risks of mortality
to pups (through starvation) may
increase. Also, adult northern elephant
seals may trample elephant seal pups if
disturbed, which could potentially
result in the of injury or death of pups.
However, the IHA will include time of
year restrictions intended to limit the
presence of researchers to months that
California sea lion and harbor seal
dependent pups are not present at the
survey sites. Additionally, though
elephant seal pups are occasionally
present at abalone surveys, risk of pup
mortalities are very low because
elephant seals are far less reactive to
researcher presence than the other two
species (an estimated 30 total elephant
seals have been disturbed in the last
three years out of 1594 present around
the study site). Last, researchers use
great care approaching sites and pups
are on the sand while the permanent
study sites are on rocks, which leaves
the two always separated by at least 50
m (164 ft). Because of the circumstances
and the IHA requirements discussed
above, NMFS believes it highly unlikely
that the authorized activities would
result in the injury or mortality of
pinnipeds (and none have been
recorded in the 27 years that the
researcher has been conducting this
research).
The results of Dr. VanBlaricom’s
monitoring under the previous IHA are
summarized in Table 1, which shows
the numbers of each species present at
Dr. VanBlaricom’s survey sites as well
as the numbers disturbed during his
visits in the last year. As part of the
required monitoring, Dr. VanBlaricom
records the numbers of disturbed
animals that flush into the water, the
number that move more than 1 m, but
do not enter the water, and the number
that become alert and move, but not
move more than 1 m (see the
application for these numbers). Animals
that raised their head and looked at the
researcher without moving were not
California Sea Lions
considered disturbed (or harrassed
pursuant to the MMPA). For the
purposes of estimating take in the IHA,
NMFS conservatively estimates take as
the total of all three categories of
disturbed behavior recorded.
As indicated in Table 1,
approximately 25 percent of the total
animals harassed by this activity
responded by flushing into the water
(221 sea lions, 46 harbor seals, and 0
elephant seals) and the rest responded
to a lesser degree by moving some
distance on land when the researchers
approached. Though the researchers
have not stayed to find how soon
pinnipeds return after flushing (leaving
as soon as possible minimizes the
effects), increasing numbers at some of
the sites and pinniped presence at sites
where they were not present before
suggest that the research is not having
any long-term detrimental effects on the
population of any of these three species.
Older, weaned sea lion pups were
seen and disturbed at sites 6, 7, and 8,
however, none were flushed into the
water or injured in any way.
Pacific Harbor Seals
Northern Elephant Seals
Month
Date
Site #
Present at
site
Disturbed
Present at
site
Disturbed
Present at
site
Disturbed
2006
January
2
1
54
1
0
0
0
0
2006
January
12
1
50
3
0
0
1
0
2006
February
25
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
2006
February
26
1
32
28
0
0
0
0
2005
December
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2005
December
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
January
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
January
15
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
January
29
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
February
24
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2005
December
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
January
16
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
January
30
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
January
31
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
February
28
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2005
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Year
December
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
January
25
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
January
30
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006
March
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
71140
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
California Sea Lions
Pacific Harbor Seals
Northern Elephant Seals
Year
Month
Date
Site #
Present at
site
Disturbed
Present at
site
Disturbed
Present at
site
Disturbed
2006
January
26
5
27
5
27
25
88
4
2006
January
14
6
86
69
13
13
216
7
2006
January
26
6
97
90
17
12
203
2
2006
January
27
7
610
386
0
0
60
0
2005
December
30
8
226
195
0
0
3
0
2006
January
13
8
241
227
0
0
5
0
2006
January
28
8
140
40
0
0
14
0
2005
December
29
9
0
0
0
0
14
1
2005
December
31
9
0
0
0
0
19
0
1564
1045
57
50
623
14
Totals
# that flushed into water
221 (21%)
46 (92%)
0
# moved >1m, but not into water
680 (65%)
3 (6%)
11 (79%)
# came alert, but did not move >1 m
144 (14%)
1 (2%)
3 (21%)
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Table 1. Results from 2006 monitoring. Number of ‘‘disturbed’’ animals indicates total of the three categories of recorded reactions, which include: animals that flushed into the water; animals that moved more than 1 m, but did not enter the water; and, animals that moved or changed
direction, but did not move more than 1 m.
Mitigation
Several mitigation measures to reduce
the potential for harassment from
population assessment research surveys
will be implemented as part of the SNI
abalone research activities. Primarily,
mitigation of the risk of disturbance to
pinnipeds requires that researchers are
judicious in the route of approach to
abalone study sites, avoiding close
contact with pinnipeds hauled out on
shore. In no case will marine mammals
be deliberately approached by abalone
survey personnel, and in all cases every
possible measure will be taken to select
a pathway of approach to study sites
that minimizes the number of marine
mammals harassed. Each visit to a given
study site will last for a maximum of 4
hours, after which the site is vacated
and can be re-occupied by any hauled
marine mammals that may have been
disturbed by the presence of abalone
researchers.
The potential risk of injury or
mortality will be avoided with measures
required under the authorization.
Disturbances to females with dependent
pups (in the cases of California sea lions
and Pacific harbor seals) will be
mitigated to the greatest extent
practicable by avoiding visits to the four
black abalone study sites with resident
pinnipeds during periods of breeding
and lactation from mid-February
through the end of October. During this
period, abalone research would be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
confined to the other five sites where
pinniped breeding and post-partum
nursing does not occur. Limiting visits
to the four breeding and lactation sites
(5, 6, 7, and 8) to periods when these
activities do not occur (November,
December, January, and the first half of
February) will reduce the possibility of
incidental harassment and the potential
for serious injury or mortality of
dependent California sea lion pups and
Pacific harbor seal pups to near zero.
Northern elephant seal pups are
present at four sites during winter
months. Risks of injury or mortality of
elephant seal pups by mother/pup
separation or trampling are limited to
the period from January through March
when pups are born, nursed, and
weaned, ending about 30 days postweaning when pups depart land for
foraging areas at sea. However, elephant
seals have a much higher tolerance of
nearby human activity than sea lions or
harbor seals. Also, elephant seal
pupping typically occurs on the sandy
beaches at SNI, approximately 50 m
(164 ft) or more away from the abalone
study sites. Possible take of northern
elephant seal pups will be minimized
by using a very careful approach to the
study sites and avoiding the proximity
of hauled seals and any seal pups
during collection of abalone population
data.
One individual Guadalupe fur seal
was seen at study site 8 on two separate
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
occasions during the summer months in
the mid–1980’s. Since the original
sightings, no individuals of this species
have been seen during abalone research.
However, to ensure that Gaudelupe fur
seals are not affected by these activities
and that authorization is not needed
pursuant to the MMPA or the ESA,
researchers will only visit site 8 from
November through January and work
will be immediately suspended and
researchers vacated if an individual is
seen. Guadalupe fur seals are distinctive
in appearance and behavior, and can be
readily identified at a distance without
any disturbance.
Sea otters, which are federally listed
as threatened under the ESA and
managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, are not expected ashore during
the time periods when the research
activities would be conducted.
However, if sea otters are sighted ashore
during the abalone research, Dr.
VanBlaricom would follow similar
procedures in place for fur seals to
avoid impacts, suspending research
activities in any areas California sea
otters are occupying.
Monitoring
Currently, all biological research
activities at SNI are subject to approval
and regulation by the Environmental
Planning and Management Department
(EPMD), U.S. Navy. The U.S. Navy owns
SNI and closely regulates all civilian
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
71141
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
research activities and contact NMFS
immediately to determine how best to
proceed to ensure that another injury or
death does not occur and to ensure that
the applicant remains in compliance
with the MMPA.
access to and activity on the island,
including biological research. Therefore,
monitoring activities will be closely
coordinated with Navy marine mammal
biologists located on SNI.
In addition, status and trends of
pinniped aggregations at SNI are
monitored by the NMFS Southwest
Fisheries Science Center. Also, longterm studies of pinniped population
dynamics, migratory and foraging
behavior, and foraging ecology at SNI
are conducted by staff at Hubbs-Sea
World Research Institute (HSWRI).
Monitoring requirements in relation
to Dr. VanBlaricom’s abalone research
surveys will include observations made
by the applicant and his associates.
Information recorded will include
species counts (with numbers of pups),
numbers of observed disturbances, and
descriptions of the disturbed behaviors
during the abalone surveys.
Observations of unusual behaviors,
numbers, or distributions of pinnipeds
on SNI will be reported to EPMD,
NMFS, and HSWRI so that any potential
follow-up observations can be
conducted by the appropriate personnel.
In addition, observations of tag-bearing
pinniped carcasses as well as any rare
or unusual species of marine mammals
will be reported to EPMD and NMFS.
If at any time injury or death of any
marine mammal occurs that may be a
result of the authorized abalone
research, Dr. VanBlaricom will suspend
Reporting
A draft final report must be submitted
to NMFS within 60 days after the
conclusion of the year-long field season.
The report will include a summary of
the information gathered pursuant to the
monitoring requirements set forth in the
IHA. A final report must be submitted
to the Regional Administrator within 30
days after receiving comments from
NMFS on the draft final report. If no
comments are received from NMFS, the
draft final report will be considered to
be the final report.
Dr. VanBlaricom has already
submitted the final report required by
the current IHA and it may be viewed
on the NMFS website (see ADDRESSES).
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected
to be Harassed
NMFS has determined that small
numbers, relative to population
estimates, of California sea lions, Pacific
harbor seals, and northern elephant
seals may be taken by harassment as a
result of this activity (1.3, 0.2, and .04
percent of the minimum population,
respectively).
The distribution of pinnipeds hauled
out on beaches is not even between sites
California Sea Lions
or at different times of the year. The
number of marine mammals disturbed
will vary by month and location, and,
compared to animals hauled out on the
beach farther away from survey activity,
only those animals hauled out closest to
the actual survey transect plots
contained within each research site are
likely to be disturbed by the presence of
researchers and alter their behavior or
attempt to move out of the way.
Table 2 depicts the total numbers of
animals encountered and disturbed by
Level B Harasssment in Dr.
VanBlaricom’s 2004, 2005, and 2006
abalone survey field seasons. As
discussed earlier, NMFS considers an
animal to have been harassed if it
moved any distance in response to the
researcher’s presence or if the animal
was already moving and changed
direction. Animals that raised their head
and looked at the researcher without
moving were not considered disturbed.
Based on past observations and
assuming a maximum level of incidental
harassment of marine mammals at each
site during periods of visitation, NMFS
estimates that the maximum total
possible numbers of individuals that
will be incidentally harassed during the
effective dates of the IHA would be 1770
California sea lions, 75 Pacific harbor
seals, and 25 northern elephant seals.
Three visits to each site are anticipated
during the year-long validity of the IHA.
Pacific Harbor Seals
Northern Elephant Seal
Year
Present around
Site
Est. Harassed
Present around
Site
Est. Harassed
Present around
Site
Est. Harassed
2004
2239
1472
108
99
562
7
2005
1383
983
99
88
409
9
2006
1564
1045
57
50
623
14
Table 2. Estimated number of each species harassed over the last three years of abalone research. Minimum population estimates for California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals, and Northern elephant seals are 138881, 31600, and 60547,respectively.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine
Mammal Habitat
Therefore, consultation under section 7
of the ESA was not required.
NMFS anticipates that the action will
result in no impacts to marine mammal
habitat beyond rendering the areas
immediately around each of the nine
study sites less desirable as haulout
sites for a total of 8.5 hours per year.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
ESA
For the reasons already described in
this Federal Register Notice, NMFS has
determined that the described abalone
research and the accompanying IHA
will have no effect on species or critical
habitat protected under the ESA
(specifically, the Guadelope fur seal).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:14 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
NMFS prepared an Environmental
Assessment (EA) of the Issuance of an
IHA to Take Marine Mammals, by
Harassment, During Black Abalone
Research at SNI, California, which
analyzed the issuance of multiple IHAs
over several years for these activities,
and subsequently issued a Finding of
No Significant Impact on November 21,
2005. A copy of the EA and FONSI are
available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Conclusions
Based on Dr. VanBlaricom’s
application and monitoring reports for
previous field seasons, as well as the
analysis contained herein, NMFS has
determined that the impact of the
described abalone research at SNI will
result, at most, in a temporary
modification in behavior by small
numbers of California sea lions, Pacific
harbor seals, and northern elephant
seals, in the form of head alerts,
movement away from the researchers
and/or flushing from the beach. In
addition, no take by injury or death is
anticipated, and take by harassment will
be at the lowest level practicable due to
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
71142
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
incorporation of the mitigation
measures mentioned previously in this
document. NMFS has further
determined the anticipated takes will
have a negligible impact on the affected
species.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to Dr. Glenn
R. VanBlaricom for the harassment of
California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals,
and northern elephant seals incidental
to black abalone population trend
research, provided the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements are incorporated.
Dated: December 1, 2006.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–20950 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
COMMITTEE FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE
AGREEMENTS
Adjustment of an Import Limit for
Certain Wool Textile Products
Produced or Manufactured in Ukraine
December 4, 2006.
Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements
(CITA).
ACTION: Issuing a directive to the
Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection adjusting a limit.
AGENCY:
December 8, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross
Arnold, International Trade Specialist,
Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S.
Department of Commerce, (202) 482–
4212. For information on the quota
status of these limits, refer to the Bureau
of Customs and Border Protection
website (https://www.cbp.gov), or call
(202) 344-2650. For information on
embargoes and quota re-openings, refer
to the Office of Textiles and Apparel
website at https://otexa.ita.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Authority: Section 204 of the Agricultural
Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1854);
Executive Order 11651 of March 3, 1972, as
amended.
The Bilateral Textile Agreement of
July 22, 1998, as amended and extended
by exchange of notes on November 19,
2004, December 31, 2004, and February
7, 2005, between the Governments of
the United States and Ukraine (the
‘‘Bilateral Agreement’’) establishes
limits for certain wool textile products,
produced or manufactured in Ukraine
and exported during the period
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
beginning on January 1, 2006 and
extending through December 31, 2006.
On December 2, 2005, the Chairman of
CITA directed the Commissioner,
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection to reduce the 2006 Category
435 limit for carryforward to be applied
to the 2005 limit. See Federal Register
Notice, 70 FR 72992 (December 8, 2005).
Because the carryforward was not fully
used in 2005, consistent with paragraph
5.D. of the Bilateral Agreement, the
current limit for Category 435 is being
increased for the recrediting of unused
2005 carryforward.
A description of the textile and
apparel categories in terms of HTS
numbers is available in the
CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel
Categories with the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (refer to
the Office of Textiles and Apparel
website at https://otexa.ita.doc.gov). Also
see Federal Register notice 70 FR
72992, published on December 8, 2005.
Philip J. Martello,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements.
Committee for the Implementation of Textile
Agreements
December 4, 2006.
Commissioner,
Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection, Washington, DC
20229
Dear Commissioner: This directive
amends, but does not cancel, the directive
issued to you on December 2, 2005, by the
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation
of Textile Agreements. That directive
concerns imports of certain wool textile
products, produced or manufactured in
Ukraine and exported during the twelvemonth period which began on January 1,
2006 and extends through December 31,
2006.
Effective on December 8, 2006, you are
directed to increase the current limit for
Category 435 to 110,160 dozen 1, as provided
for under the bilateral agreement between the
Governments of the United States and
Ukraine:
The Committee for the Implementation of
Textile Agreements has determined that this
action falls within the foreign affairs
exception to the rulemaking provisions of 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(1).
Sincerely,
Philip J. Martello,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. E6–20942 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS
1 The limit has not been adjusted to account for
any imports exported after December 31, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Board of Visitors, United States
Military Academy (USMA)
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463),
announcement is made of the following
committee meeting:
Name of Committee: Board of
Visitors, United States Military
Academy.
Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2007.
Place of Meeting: Veterans Affairs
Conference room, Room 418, Senate
Russell Building, Washington, DC.
Start Time of Meeting: Approximately
9 a.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Colonel Shaun T. Wurzbach,
United States Military Academy, West
Point, NY 10996–5000, (845) 938–4200.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed
Agenda: Organizational Meeting of the
Board of Visitors. Review of the
Academic, Military and Physical
Programs at the USMA. Elections for
Board of Visitor Leadership positions
will also be held. All proceedings are
open.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–9596 Filed 12–07–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Notice of Availability of Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Project, in the City of Rancho Cordova,
Sacramento County, CA
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
DoD. Sacramento District has prepared
a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) that analyzes the potential effects
of implementing each of five alternative
scenarios for a mixed-use development
in the approximately 3,828-acre Rio del
Oro Specific Plan area, in the City of
Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County,
CA. The EIS documents the existing
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71136-71142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20950]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 101706E]
Incidental Takes of Marine Mammals During Specified Activities;
Black Abalone Research Surveys at San Nicolas Island, Ventura County,
CA
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental harassment authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA)
regulations, notification is hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization (IHA) to Dr. Glenn VanBlaricom (Dr.
VanBlaricom) for the take of marine mammals, by Level B harassment
only, incidental to the assessment of black abalone populations at San
Nicolas Island (SNI), CA.
DATES: Effective from December 1, 2006, through November 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the IHA and the application are available by
writing to Michael Payne, Chief, Permits, Conservation, and Education
Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3225, or by
telephoning the contact listed here. A copy of the application
containing a list of references used in this document may be obtained
by writing to this address, by telephoning the contact listed here (FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental.htm. Documents cited in this notice may be viewed,
by appointment, during regular business hours, at the aforementioned
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie Harrison, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 713-2289, ext. 166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of marine mammals by U.S.
citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial
fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are
made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is provided to the
public for review.
Authorization shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will
have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s), will not have an
unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses, and that the permissible methods of
taking and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and
reporting of such takings are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible
impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as ''...an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival.''
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA established an expedited process
by
[[Page 71137]]
which citizens of the United States can apply for an authorization to
incidentally take small numbers of marine mammals by harassment. Except
with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA defines
``harassment'' as:
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the
potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild [Level A harassment]; or (ii) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering
[Level B harassment].
Section 101(a)(5)(D) establishes a 45-day time limit for NMFS
review of an application followed by a 30-day public notice and comment
period on any proposed authorizations for the incidental harassment of
marine mammals. Within 45 days of the close of the comment period, NMFS
must either issue or deny issuance of the authorization.
Summary of Request
On August 10, 2006, NMFS received a letter from Dr. VanBlaricom, of
the Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, requesting
renewal of an IHA that was first issued to him on September 23, 2003
(68 FR 57427, October 3, 2003), and was last reissued on November 30,
2005 (70 FR 73732, December 13, 2005). The proposed 2006/2007 IHA was
published, and comments solicited, on October 23, 2006 (71 FR 62087).
This final IHA will authorize the take, by harassment, of small numbers
of California sea lions (Zalophus californianus), Pacific harbor seals
(Phoca vitulina), and northern elephant seals (Mirounga angustirostris)
incidental to research surveys performed for the purpose of assessing
trends in black abalone (Haliotis cracherodii) populations at SNI,
Ventura County, California. The research consists of 2 researchers, on
foot, counting abalone at nine permanent sites (1 m2 each) on SNI twice
a year, with one brief additional visit to each site for maintenance.
Population trend data for black abalone populations have become
important in a conservation context because of: (a) the reintroduction
of sea otters to SNI in 1987, raising the possibility of conflict
between otter conservation and abalone populations (abalones are often
significant prey for sea otters); (b) the appearance of a novel exotic
disease, abalone withering syndrome, at SNI in 1992, resulting in
dramatically increased rates of abalone mortality at the Island; and,
(c) the recent designation of California populations of black abalones
as a species of concern in the context of listing pursuant to the
Endangered Species Act (ESA). Research is done under the auspices of
the Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, the
University of Washington, and the U.S. Navy (owner of SNI), with
additional logistical support from the University of California, Santa
Cruz. Since the abalone are not handled or removed in the course of the
research, neither a state nor federal permit is needed.
Additional information on the research is contained in the
application and is available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
Project Description
Nine permanent abalone research study areas are located in rocky
intertidal habitats on SNI in Ventura County, CA. The applicant has
made 106 separate field trips to SNI from September 1979 through March
2006, participating in abalone survey work on 564 different days at
nine permanent study sites. Under the 2005/2006 authorization, Dr.
VanBlaricom made five different visits and conducted work for 30 total
days in the one year period.
Quantitative abalone surveys on SNI began in 1981, at which point
permanent research sites were chosen based on the presence of dense
patches of abalone in order to monitor changes over time in dense
abalone aggregations. Research is conducted by counting black abalone
in plots of 1 m2 (3.3 ft2) along permanent transect lines in rocky
intertidal habitats at each of the nine study sites on the island.
Permanent transect lines are demarcated by stainless steel eyebolts
embedded in the rock substrata and secured with marine epoxy compound.
Lines are placed temporarily between bolts during surveys and are
removed once surveys are completed. Survey work is done by two field
biologists working on foot (sites are accessed by hiking to water from
vehicle parked inland) and monitoring of black abalone populations at
SNI can be done only during periods of extreme low tides. The exact
date of a visit to any given site is difficult to predict because
variation in surf height and sea conditions can influence the safety of
field biologists as well as the quality of data collected. In most
years survey work is done during the months of January, February,
March, July, November, and December because of optimal availability of
low tides. All work is done during daylight hours due to of safety
considerations.
During the year, each of the nine permanent study sites at SNI will
be visited three times. Abalone surveys, which take no more than 4
hours at each site, are conducted during two of the three visits to
each of the nine sites. The third, and final, visit is a maintenance
visit, which takes less than half of an hour at each site and is used
to take measurements and make necessary repairs to plots and is
conducted in a month when smaller numbers of pinnipeds are present.
The affected marine mammal populations at SNI, especially
California sea lions and northern elephant seals, have grown
substantially since the beginning of abalone research in 1979 and have
occupied an expanded distribution on the island due to population
growth. Sites previously accessible with no risk of marine mammal
harassment are now being utilized by marine mammals at levels such that
approach without the possibility of harassment is difficult. An IHA is
warranted for this study because of the nine study sites used for the
abalone surveys, only two sites can be occupied without the possibility
of disturbing at least one species of pinniped.
Description of Habitat and Marine Mammals in the Activity Area
San Nicolas is one of the eight Channel Islands, located in the
Santa Barbara Channel off Southern California. Nine miles long (14.5
km) and about 3 1/2 miles (5.6 km) across at its widest point, it is
the farthest island from the mainland, more than 60 miles (96.6 km)
offshore and about 85 miles (136.8 km) southwest of Los Angeles,
California. SNI is owned and operated by the U.S. Navy and is off-
limits to civilians without specific permission.
Many of the beaches in the Channel Islands provide resting, molting
or breeding places for species of pinnipeds. On SNI, three pinniped
species (northern elephant seal, Pacific harbor seal, and California
sea lion) can be expected to occur on land in the vicinity of abalone
research sites either regularly or in large numbers during certain
times of the year. In addition, a single adult male Guadalupe fur seal
(Arctocephalus townsendi) (federally listed as threatened under the
Endangered Species Act) was seen at one abalone research site on two
occasions during the summer months in the mid-1980's. However, none
have been seen since those original sightings. Further information on
the biology and distribution of these species and others in the region
can be found in Dr. VanBlaricom's application, which is
[[Page 71138]]
available upon request (see ADDRESSES), and the Marine Mammal Stock
Assessment Reports, which are available online at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/prot_res/PR2/Stock_Assessment_Program/individual_
sars.html.
California Sea Lions
The U.S. stock of California sea lions extends from the U.S./Mexico
border north into Canada. Breeding areas of the sea lion are on islands
located in southern California, western Baja California, and the Gulf
of California and they primarily use the central California area to
feed during the non-breeding season. Population estimates for the U.S.
stock of California sea lions, which are based on counts conducted in
2001 and extrapolations from the number of pups, range from a minimum
of 138,881 to an average of 244,000 animals, with a current growth rate
of 5.4 to 6.1 percent per year (Carretta et al., 2005). The California
sea lion is not listed under the ESA and the U.S. stock is not
considered depleted under the MMPA.
California sea lions haul out at many sites on SNI and are by far
the most common pinniped on the island. Over the course of a year, up
to 100,000 sea lions may use SNI. Numbers of sea lions at SNI increased
by about 21 percent per year between 1983 and 1995 (NMFS, 2003) and sea
lions have recently started occupying areas that were not formerly
used. Pupping occurs on the beaches of SNI from mid-June to mid-July.
Females nurse their pups for about eight days and then begin an
alternating pattern of foraging at sea vs. attending and nursing the
pup on land, which lasts for about eight months, and sometimes up to a
year. California sea lions also haul out at SNI during the molting
period in September, and smaller numbers of females and juveniles haul
out during most of the year.
Pacific Harbor Seals
Harbor seals are widely distributed in the North Atlantic and North
Pacific. In California, approximately 400-500 harbor seal haul-out
sites are distributed along the mainland and on offshore islands,
including intertidal sandbars, rocky shores and beaches (Hanan, 1996).
A complete count of all harbor seals in California is impossible
because some are always away from the haul-out sites. A complete pup
count (as is done for other pinnipeds in California) is also not
possible because harbor seals are precocious, with pups entering the
water almost immediately after birth. Based on the most recent harbor
seal counts (2004 and 2005) and including a correction factor for the
above, the estimated population of harbor seals in California is 34,233
(Caretta et al., 2005), with an estimated minimum population of 31,600
for the California stock of harbor seals. Counts of harbor seals in
California showed a rapid increase from 1972 to 1990, but since 1990
there has been no net population growth along the mainland or the
Channel Islands. Though no formal determination of Optimal Sustainable
Population (OSP) has been made, the decrease in the growth rate may
indicate that the population has reached its carrying capacity. The
harbor seal is not listed under the ESA and the California stock is not
considered depleted under the MMPA.
Harbor seals haul out at various sandy, cobble, and gravel beaches
around SNI and pupping occurs on the beaches from late February to
early April, with nursing of pups extending into May. Harbor seals may
also haul out during molting period in late Spring, and smaller numbers
haul out at other times of year. Harbor seal abundance increased at SNI
from the 1960s until 1981, but since the average counts have not
changed significantly. From 1982 to 1994, numbers of harbor seals have
fluctuated between 139 and 700 harbor seals based on both peak ground
counts and annual photographic survey photos. The most recent aerial
count on SNI was of 457 harbor seals in 1994.
Northern Elephant Seals
Northern elephant seals breed and give birth in California (U.S.)
and Baja California primarily on offshore islands, from December to
March (Stewart et al., 1994). The California breeding stock, which
includes the animals on SNI, is now demographically separated from the
Baja California population. Based on trends in pup counts, northern
elephant seal colonies appeared to be increasing in California through
2001. The population size of northern elephant seals in California is
estimated to be 101,000 animals, with a minimum population estimate of
60,547 (Carretta et al., 2005). A continuous average growth rate
(though it has declined a bit in recent years) of 8.3 percent has seen
numbers of this species increase from 100 in 1900 to the current
population size (Caretta et al., 2005). The northern elephant seal is
not listed under the ESA and the California stock is not considered
depleted under the MMPA.
Increasing numbers of elephant seals haul out at various sites
around SNI. Based on a pup count in 1995 that found 6,575 pups,
scientists estimated that over 23,000 elephant seals may use SNI in a
year (NMFS, 2003). From 1988 to 1995 the pup counts on SNI increased at
an average rate of 15.4 percent per year, however, the growth rate of
the population as a whole seems to have declined in recent years (NMFS,
2003). Pupping occurs on the beaches of SNI from January to early
February, with nursing of pups extending into March. Northern elephant
seals also haul out during the molting periods in the spring and
summer, and smaller numbers haul out at other times of the year.
Comments and Responses
On October 23, 2006, NMFS published in the Federal Register a
notice of a proposed IHA for Dr. VanBlaricom's request to take marine
mammals incidental to conducting black abalone research on SNI, and
requested comments regarding this proposed IHA (See 71 FR 62087).
During the 30-day public comment period, NMFS received one comment from
the Marine Mammal Commission recommending NMFS issue the IHA as
proposed.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine Mammals
Variable numbers of sea lions, harbor seals, and elephant seals
typically haul out near seven of the nine study sites used for abalone
research, with breeding activity occurring at four of these seven
sites. Pinnipeds likely to be affected by abalone research activity are
those that are hauled out on land at or near study sites.
Incidental harassment may result if hauled animals move away from
the abalone researchers. For the purpose of estimating numbers of
pinnipeds taken by these activities, NMFS conservatively estimates that
pinnipeds that move or change the direction of their movement in
response to the presence of researchers are taken by Level B
Harassment. Animals that raise their head and look at the researcher
are not considered to have been taken. Although marine mammals will not
be deliberately approached by abalone survey personnel, approach may be
unavoidable if pinnipeds are hauled out directly upon the permanent
abalone study plots. In almost all cases, shoreline habitats near the
abalone study sites are gently sloping sandy beaches or horizontal
sandstone platforms with unimpeded and non-hazardous access to the
water. If disturbed, hauled animals may move toward the water without
risk of encountering significant hazards. In these circumstances, the
risk of serious injury or death to hauled animals is very low.
[[Page 71139]]
The risk of marine mammal injury or mortality associated with
abalone research increases somewhat if disturbances occur during
breeding season, as it is possible that mothers and dependent pups
could become separated. If separated pairs don't reunite fairly
quickly, risks of mortality to pups (through starvation) may increase.
Also, adult northern elephant seals may trample elephant seal pups if
disturbed, which could potentially result in the of injury or death of
pups. However, the IHA will include time of year restrictions intended
to limit the presence of researchers to months that California sea lion
and harbor seal dependent pups are not present at the survey sites.
Additionally, though elephant seal pups are occasionally present at
abalone surveys, risk of pup mortalities are very low because elephant
seals are far less reactive to researcher presence than the other two
species (an estimated 30 total elephant seals have been disturbed in
the last three years out of 1594 present around the study site). Last,
researchers use great care approaching sites and pups are on the sand
while the permanent study sites are on rocks, which leaves the two
always separated by at least 50 m (164 ft). Because of the
circumstances and the IHA requirements discussed above, NMFS believes
it highly unlikely that the authorized activities would result in the
injury or mortality of pinnipeds (and none have been recorded in the 27
years that the researcher has been conducting this research).
The results of Dr. VanBlaricom's monitoring under the previous IHA
are summarized in Table 1, which shows the numbers of each species
present at Dr. VanBlaricom's survey sites as well as the numbers
disturbed during his visits in the last year. As part of the required
monitoring, Dr. VanBlaricom records the numbers of disturbed animals
that flush into the water, the number that move more than 1 m, but do
not enter the water, and the number that become alert and move, but not
move more than 1 m (see the application for these numbers). Animals
that raised their head and looked at the researcher without moving were
not considered disturbed (or harrassed pursuant to the MMPA). For the
purposes of estimating take in the IHA, NMFS conservatively estimates
take as the total of all three categories of disturbed behavior
recorded.
As indicated in Table 1, approximately 25 percent of the total
animals harassed by this activity responded by flushing into the water
(221 sea lions, 46 harbor seals, and 0 elephant seals) and the rest
responded to a lesser degree by moving some distance on land when the
researchers approached. Though the researchers have not stayed to find
how soon pinnipeds return after flushing (leaving as soon as possible
minimizes the effects), increasing numbers at some of the sites and
pinniped presence at sites where they were not present before suggest
that the research is not having any long-term detrimental effects on
the population of any of these three species.
Older, weaned sea lion pups were seen and disturbed at sites 6, 7,
and 8, however, none were flushed into the water or injured in any way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Sea Lions Pacific Harbor Seals Northern Elephant Seals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site site Disturbed site Disturbed site Disturbed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 2 1 54 1 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 12 1 50 3 0 0 1 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 February 25 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 February 26 1 32 28 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 December 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 December 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 15 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 29 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 February 24 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 December 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 30 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 31 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 February 28 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 December 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 25 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 30 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 March 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 71140]]
2006 January 26 5 27 5 27 25 88 4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 14 6 86 69 13 13 216 7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 26 6 97 90 17 12 203 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 27 7 610 386 0 0 60 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 December 30 8 226 195 0 0 3 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 13 8 241 227 0 0 5 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 January 28 8 140 40 0 0 14 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 December 29 9 0 0 0 0 14 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 December 31 9 0 0 0 0 19 0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals 1564 1045 57 50 623 14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
that flushed into water ........... 221 (21%) ........... 46 (92%) ........... 0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
moved >1m, but not into water ........... 680 (65%) ........... 3 (6%) ........... 11 (79%)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
came alert, but did not move >1 m ........... 144 (14%) ........... 1 (2%) ........... 3 (21%)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 1. Results from 2006 monitoring. Number of ``disturbed'' animals indicates total of the three categories of recorded reactions, which include:
animals that flushed into the water; animals that moved more than 1 m, but did not enter the water; and, animals that moved or changed direction, but
did not move more than 1 m.
Mitigation
Several mitigation measures to reduce the potential for harassment
from population assessment research surveys will be implemented as part
of the SNI abalone research activities. Primarily, mitigation of the
risk of disturbance to pinnipeds requires that researchers are
judicious in the route of approach to abalone study sites, avoiding
close contact with pinnipeds hauled out on shore. In no case will
marine mammals be deliberately approached by abalone survey personnel,
and in all cases every possible measure will be taken to select a
pathway of approach to study sites that minimizes the number of marine
mammals harassed. Each visit to a given study site will last for a
maximum of 4 hours, after which the site is vacated and can be re-
occupied by any hauled marine mammals that may have been disturbed by
the presence of abalone researchers.
The potential risk of injury or mortality will be avoided with
measures required under the authorization. Disturbances to females with
dependent pups (in the cases of California sea lions and Pacific harbor
seals) will be mitigated to the greatest extent practicable by avoiding
visits to the four black abalone study sites with resident pinnipeds
during periods of breeding and lactation from mid-February through the
end of October. During this period, abalone research would be confined
to the other five sites where pinniped breeding and post-partum nursing
does not occur. Limiting visits to the four breeding and lactation
sites (5, 6, 7, and 8) to periods when these activities do not occur
(November, December, January, and the first half of February) will
reduce the possibility of incidental harassment and the potential for
serious injury or mortality of dependent California sea lion pups and
Pacific harbor seal pups to near zero.
Northern elephant seal pups are present at four sites during winter
months. Risks of injury or mortality of elephant seal pups by mother/
pup separation or trampling are limited to the period from January
through March when pups are born, nursed, and weaned, ending about 30
days post-weaning when pups depart land for foraging areas at sea.
However, elephant seals have a much higher tolerance of nearby human
activity than sea lions or harbor seals. Also, elephant seal pupping
typically occurs on the sandy beaches at SNI, approximately 50 m (164
ft) or more away from the abalone study sites. Possible take of
northern elephant seal pups will be minimized by using a very careful
approach to the study sites and avoiding the proximity of hauled seals
and any seal pups during collection of abalone population data.
One individual Guadalupe fur seal was seen at study site 8 on two
separate occasions during the summer months in the mid-1980's. Since
the original sightings, no individuals of this species have been seen
during abalone research. However, to ensure that Gaudelupe fur seals
are not affected by these activities and that authorization is not
needed pursuant to the MMPA or the ESA, researchers will only visit
site 8 from November through January and work will be immediately
suspended and researchers vacated if an individual is seen. Guadalupe
fur seals are distinctive in appearance and behavior, and can be
readily identified at a distance without any disturbance.
Sea otters, which are federally listed as threatened under the ESA
and managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, are not expected
ashore during the time periods when the research activities would be
conducted. However, if sea otters are sighted ashore during the abalone
research, Dr. VanBlaricom would follow similar procedures in place for
fur seals to avoid impacts, suspending research activities in any areas
California sea otters are occupying.
Monitoring
Currently, all biological research activities at SNI are subject to
approval and regulation by the Environmental Planning and Management
Department (EPMD), U.S. Navy. The U.S. Navy owns SNI and closely
regulates all civilian
[[Page 71141]]
access to and activity on the island, including biological research.
Therefore, monitoring activities will be closely coordinated with Navy
marine mammal biologists located on SNI.
In addition, status and trends of pinniped aggregations at SNI are
monitored by the NMFS Southwest Fisheries Science Center. Also, long-
term studies of pinniped population dynamics, migratory and foraging
behavior, and foraging ecology at SNI are conducted by staff at Hubbs-
Sea World Research Institute (HSWRI).
Monitoring requirements in relation to Dr. VanBlaricom's abalone
research surveys will include observations made by the applicant and
his associates. Information recorded will include species counts (with
numbers of pups), numbers of observed disturbances, and descriptions of
the disturbed behaviors during the abalone surveys. Observations of
unusual behaviors, numbers, or distributions of pinnipeds on SNI will
be reported to EPMD, NMFS, and HSWRI so that any potential follow-up
observations can be conducted by the appropriate personnel. In
addition, observations of tag-bearing pinniped carcasses as well as any
rare or unusual species of marine mammals will be reported to EPMD and
NMFS.
If at any time injury or death of any marine mammal occurs that may
be a result of the authorized abalone research, Dr. VanBlaricom will
suspend research activities and contact NMFS immediately to determine
how best to proceed to ensure that another injury or death does not
occur and to ensure that the applicant remains in compliance with the
MMPA.
Reporting
A draft final report must be submitted to NMFS within 60 days after
the conclusion of the year-long field season. The report will include a
summary of the information gathered pursuant to the monitoring
requirements set forth in the IHA. A final report must be submitted to
the Regional Administrator within 30 days after receiving comments from
NMFS on the draft final report. If no comments are received from NMFS,
the draft final report will be considered to be the final report.
Dr. VanBlaricom has already submitted the final report required by
the current IHA and it may be viewed on the NMFS website (see
ADDRESSES).
Numbers of Marine Mammals Expected to be Harassed
NMFS has determined that small numbers, relative to population
estimates, of California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals, and northern
elephant seals may be taken by harassment as a result of this activity
(1.3, 0.2, and .04 percent of the minimum population, respectively).
The distribution of pinnipeds hauled out on beaches is not even
between sites or at different times of the year. The number of marine
mammals disturbed will vary by month and location, and, compared to
animals hauled out on the beach farther away from survey activity, only
those animals hauled out closest to the actual survey transect plots
contained within each research site are likely to be disturbed by the
presence of researchers and alter their behavior or attempt to move out
of the way.
Table 2 depicts the total numbers of animals encountered and
disturbed by Level B Harasssment in Dr. VanBlaricom's 2004, 2005, and
2006 abalone survey field seasons. As discussed earlier, NMFS considers
an animal to have been harassed if it moved any distance in response to
the researcher's presence or if the animal was already moving and
changed direction. Animals that raised their head and looked at the
researcher without moving were not considered disturbed. Based on past
observations and assuming a maximum level of incidental harassment of
marine mammals at each site during periods of visitation, NMFS
estimates that the maximum total possible numbers of individuals that
will be incidentally harassed during the effective dates of the IHA
would be 1770 California sea lions, 75 Pacific harbor seals, and 25
northern elephant seals. Three visits to each site are anticipated
during the year-long validity of the IHA.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California Sea Lions Pacific Harbor Seals Northern Elephant Seal
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Present Est. Present Est. Present Est.
Year around Site Harassed around Site Harassed around Site Harassed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2004 2239 1472 108 99 562 7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2005 1383 983 99 88 409 9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 1564 1045 57 50 623 14
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2. Estimated number of each species harassed over the last three years of abalone research. Minimum
population estimates for California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals, and Northern elephant seals are 138881,
31600, and 60547,respectively.
Potential Effects of Activities on Marine Mammal Habitat
NMFS anticipates that the action will result in no impacts to
marine mammal habitat beyond rendering the areas immediately around
each of the nine study sites less desirable as haulout sites for a
total of 8.5 hours per year.
ESA
For the reasons already described in this Federal Register Notice,
NMFS has determined that the described abalone research and the
accompanying IHA will have no effect on species or critical habitat
protected under the ESA (specifically, the Guadelope fur seal).
Therefore, consultation under section 7 of the ESA was not required.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
NMFS prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) of the Issuance of
an IHA to Take Marine Mammals, by Harassment, During Black Abalone
Research at SNI, California, which analyzed the issuance of multiple
IHAs over several years for these activities, and subsequently issued a
Finding of No Significant Impact on November 21, 2005. A copy of the EA
and FONSI are available upon request (see ADDRESSES).
Conclusions
Based on Dr. VanBlaricom's application and monitoring reports for
previous field seasons, as well as the analysis contained herein, NMFS
has determined that the impact of the described abalone research at SNI
will result, at most, in a temporary modification in behavior by small
numbers of California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals, and northern
elephant seals, in the form of head alerts, movement away from the
researchers and/or flushing from the beach. In addition, no take by
injury or death is anticipated, and take by harassment will be at the
lowest level practicable due to
[[Page 71142]]
incorporation of the mitigation measures mentioned previously in this
document. NMFS has further determined the anticipated takes will have a
negligible impact on the affected species.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to Dr. Glenn R. VanBlaricom for the
harassment of California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals, and northern
elephant seals incidental to black abalone population trend research,
provided the previously mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements are incorporated.
Dated: December 1, 2006.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-20950 Filed 12-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S