Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Confidential Conflict of Interest Disclosure for Prospective Non-Federal Government Peer Reviewers of Government Science Documents, 71135-71136 [E6-20882]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
ton of all successful bids, (iii) the
average price per metric tons for all
successful bids, and (iv) the names of
the winning bidders.
Dated: December 4, 2006.
Jeffrey Anspacher,
Director, Export Trading Company Affairs.
[FR Doc. E6–20904 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Regional
Economic Data Collection Program for
Gulf Coast Alaska
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before February 6, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Chang Seung, (206) 526–
4250 or Chang.Seung@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
I. Abstract
The regional or community economic
analysis of proposed fishery
management policies is required by the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA), National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA), and Executive Order 12866,
among others. To satisfy these mandates
and inform policymakers and the public
of the likely regional economic impacts
associated with fishery management
policies, appropriate economic models
and the data to implement these models
are needed.
Much of the data required for regional
economic analysis associated with Gulf
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
Coast Alaska fisheries are either
unavailable or unreliable. The accurate
fishery-level data on employment, labor
income, and expenditures in the Gulf
Coast Alaska fishery and related
industries are not currently available
but are needed to estimate the effects of
fisheries on the economy of Gulf Coast
Alaska. In this survey effort, data on
these important regional economic
variables will be collected and used to
develop models that will provide more
reliable estimates and significantly
improve policy-makers’ ability to assess
policy effects on fishery-dependent
communities in Gulf Coast Alaska. The
survey will be a one-time survey.
Mail surveys will be used to collect
data on employment and labor income
from a random sample of 530 vessel
owners whose boats delivered fish to
Gulf Coast Alaska processors. In-person
interviews and telephone calls (130)
with businesses involved in the fishery
and related industries will be used to
obtain (a) Vessel expenditure/cost data;
(b) regional economic data for nonfishery industries; and (c) regional
economic data for the fish processing
sector.
II. Method of Collection
Mail surveys, in-person interviews,
and telephone surveys will be used as
described above.
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
660.
Estimated Time per Response: Mail
survey: 10 minutes; phone call or local
interview with fish processors: 30
minutes; phone calls with local small
businesses: 10 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 132 hours.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71135
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 4. 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–20802 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; Confidential
Conflict of Interest Disclosure for
Prospective Non-Federal Government
Peer Reviewers of Government
Science Documents
National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before February 6, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via e-mail at
dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument and instructions should be
directed to Tom Gleason, (301) 713–
2367 x 158, Tom.Gleason@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) issued government-wide
guidance to enhance the practice of peer
review of government science
documents. OMB’s Final Information
Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (‘‘Peer
Review Bulletin’’ or PRB) (available at
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
71136
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/
memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf)
establishes minimum peer review
standards for influential scientific
information that Federal agencies intend
to disseminate. The Peer Review
Bulletin also directs Federal agencies to
adopt or adapt the National Academy of
Sciences (NAS) policy for evaluating
conflicts of interest when selecting peer
reviewers who are not Federal
government employees (federal
employees are subject to Federal ethics
requirements). For peer review
purposes, the term ‘‘conflicts of
interest’’ means any financial or other
interest which conflicts with the service
of the individual because it could: (1)
Significantly impair the individual’s
objectivity; or (2) create an unfair
competitive advantage for any person or
organization.
NOAA has adapted the NAS policy
and developed two confidential conflict
disclosure forms which the agency will
use to examine prospective reviewers’
potential financial conflicts and other
interests that could impair objectivity or
create an unfair advantage. One form is
for peer reviewers of studies related to
government regulation and the other
form is for all other influential scientific
information subject to the Peer Review
Bulletin. The forms include questions
about employment as well as
investment and property interests and
research funding. Both forms also
require the submission of curriculum
vitae.
NOAA is seeking to collect this
information from potential peer
reviewers who are not government
employees when conducting a peer
review pursuant to the PRB. The
number of peer reviews conducted
pursuant to the PRB each year will vary,
but for illustrative purposes, NOAA
currently has thirty-nine peer review
plans posted on the Department of
Commerce Peer Review Agenda,
indicating that for a six-month period in
FY 2006, thirty-nine agency reports had
recently been completed, were presently
undergoing, or were planning to begin
peer review. The information collected
in the conflict of interest disclosure is
essential to NOAA’s compliance with
the OMB PRB, and helps to ensure that
government studies are reviewed by
independent, impartial peer reviewers.
II. Method of Collection
Forms may be downloaded from the
Internet and are fillable and signable
electronically or manually. They may be
submitted, along with the Curriculum
Vitae, via e-mail or regular mail.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
300.
Estimated Time per Response: 30
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 150.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: December 5, 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6–20882 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 101706E]
Incidental Takes of Marine Mammals
During Specified Activities; Black
Abalone Research Surveys at San
Nicolas Island, Ventura County, CA
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) regulations, notification is
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
hereby given that NMFS has issued an
Incidental Harassment Authorization
(IHA) to Dr. Glenn VanBlaricom (Dr.
VanBlaricom) for the take of marine
mammals, by Level B harassment only,
incidental to the assessment of black
abalone populations at San Nicolas
Island (SNI), CA.
DATES: Effective from December 1, 2006,
through November 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: A copy of the IHA and the
application are available by writing to
Michael Payne, Chief, Permits,
Conservation, and Education Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service, 1315 EastWest Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910–3225, or by telephoning the
contact listed here. A copy of the
application containing a list of
references used in this document may
be obtained by writing to this address,
by telephoning the contact listed here
(FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) or
online at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
permits/incidental.htm. Documents
cited in this notice may be viewed, by
appointment, during regular business
hours, at the aforementioned address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolie
Harrison, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS, (301) 713–2289, ext. 166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce to allow,
upon request, the incidental, but not
intentional, taking of marine mammals
by U.S. citizens who engage in a
specified activity (other than
commercial fishing) within a specified
geographical region if certain findings
are made and either regulations are
issued or, if the taking is limited to
harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public
for review.
Authorization shall be granted if
NMFS finds that the taking will have a
negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of the
species or stock(s) for subsistence uses,
and that the permissible methods of
taking and requirements pertaining to
the mitigation, monitoring and reporting
of such takings are set forth. NMFS has
defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR
216.103 as ’’...an impact resulting from
the specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.’’
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
established an expedited process by
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71135-71136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20882]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Confidential
Conflict of Interest Disclosure for Prospective Non-Federal Government
Peer Reviewers of Government Science Documents
AGENCY: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before February 6,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 6625, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via e-mail at
dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument and instructions should
be directed to Tom Gleason, (301) 713-2367 x 158, Tom.Gleason@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued government-wide
guidance to enhance the practice of peer review of government science
documents. OMB's Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review
(``Peer Review Bulletin'' or PRB) (available at
[[Page 71136]]
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/memoranda/fy2005/m05-03.pdf) establishes
minimum peer review standards for influential scientific information
that Federal agencies intend to disseminate. The Peer Review Bulletin
also directs Federal agencies to adopt or adapt the National Academy of
Sciences (NAS) policy for evaluating conflicts of interest when
selecting peer reviewers who are not Federal government employees
(federal employees are subject to Federal ethics requirements). For
peer review purposes, the term ``conflicts of interest'' means any
financial or other interest which conflicts with the service of the
individual because it could: (1) Significantly impair the individual's
objectivity; or (2) create an unfair competitive advantage for any
person or organization.
NOAA has adapted the NAS policy and developed two confidential
conflict disclosure forms which the agency will use to examine
prospective reviewers' potential financial conflicts and other
interests that could impair objectivity or create an unfair advantage.
One form is for peer reviewers of studies related to government
regulation and the other form is for all other influential scientific
information subject to the Peer Review Bulletin. The forms include
questions about employment as well as investment and property interests
and research funding. Both forms also require the submission of
curriculum vitae.
NOAA is seeking to collect this information from potential peer
reviewers who are not government employees when conducting a peer
review pursuant to the PRB. The number of peer reviews conducted
pursuant to the PRB each year will vary, but for illustrative purposes,
NOAA currently has thirty-nine peer review plans posted on the
Department of Commerce Peer Review Agenda, indicating that for a six-
month period in FY 2006, thirty-nine agency reports had recently been
completed, were presently undergoing, or were planning to begin peer
review. The information collected in the conflict of interest
disclosure is essential to NOAA's compliance with the OMB PRB, and
helps to ensure that government studies are reviewed by independent,
impartial peer reviewers.
II. Method of Collection
Forms may be downloaded from the Internet and are fillable and
signable electronically or manually. They may be submitted, along with
the Curriculum Vitae, via e-mail or regular mail.
III. Data
OMB Number: None.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals or households.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 300.
Estimated Time per Response: 30 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 150.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: December 5, 2006.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E6-20882 Filed 12-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-12-P