Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project, in the City of Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County, CA, 71142-71143 [06-9597]
Download as PDF
71142
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
incorporation of the mitigation
measures mentioned previously in this
document. NMFS has further
determined the anticipated takes will
have a negligible impact on the affected
species.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to Dr. Glenn
R. VanBlaricom for the harassment of
California sea lions, Pacific harbor seals,
and northern elephant seals incidental
to black abalone population trend
research, provided the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and
reporting requirements are incorporated.
Dated: December 1, 2006.
James H. Lecky,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E6–20950 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
COMMITTEE FOR THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF TEXTILE
AGREEMENTS
Adjustment of an Import Limit for
Certain Wool Textile Products
Produced or Manufactured in Ukraine
December 4, 2006.
Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements
(CITA).
ACTION: Issuing a directive to the
Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection adjusting a limit.
AGENCY:
December 8, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross
Arnold, International Trade Specialist,
Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S.
Department of Commerce, (202) 482–
4212. For information on the quota
status of these limits, refer to the Bureau
of Customs and Border Protection
website (https://www.cbp.gov), or call
(202) 344-2650. For information on
embargoes and quota re-openings, refer
to the Office of Textiles and Apparel
website at https://otexa.ita.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Authority: Section 204 of the Agricultural
Act of 1956, as amended (7 U.S.C. 1854);
Executive Order 11651 of March 3, 1972, as
amended.
The Bilateral Textile Agreement of
July 22, 1998, as amended and extended
by exchange of notes on November 19,
2004, December 31, 2004, and February
7, 2005, between the Governments of
the United States and Ukraine (the
‘‘Bilateral Agreement’’) establishes
limits for certain wool textile products,
produced or manufactured in Ukraine
and exported during the period
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
beginning on January 1, 2006 and
extending through December 31, 2006.
On December 2, 2005, the Chairman of
CITA directed the Commissioner,
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection to reduce the 2006 Category
435 limit for carryforward to be applied
to the 2005 limit. See Federal Register
Notice, 70 FR 72992 (December 8, 2005).
Because the carryforward was not fully
used in 2005, consistent with paragraph
5.D. of the Bilateral Agreement, the
current limit for Category 435 is being
increased for the recrediting of unused
2005 carryforward.
A description of the textile and
apparel categories in terms of HTS
numbers is available in the
CORRELATION: Textile and Apparel
Categories with the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (refer to
the Office of Textiles and Apparel
website at https://otexa.ita.doc.gov). Also
see Federal Register notice 70 FR
72992, published on December 8, 2005.
Philip J. Martello,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements.
Committee for the Implementation of Textile
Agreements
December 4, 2006.
Commissioner,
Commissioner, Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection, Washington, DC
20229
Dear Commissioner: This directive
amends, but does not cancel, the directive
issued to you on December 2, 2005, by the
Chairman, Committee for the Implementation
of Textile Agreements. That directive
concerns imports of certain wool textile
products, produced or manufactured in
Ukraine and exported during the twelvemonth period which began on January 1,
2006 and extends through December 31,
2006.
Effective on December 8, 2006, you are
directed to increase the current limit for
Category 435 to 110,160 dozen 1, as provided
for under the bilateral agreement between the
Governments of the United States and
Ukraine:
The Committee for the Implementation of
Textile Agreements has determined that this
action falls within the foreign affairs
exception to the rulemaking provisions of 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(1).
Sincerely,
Philip J. Martello,
Acting Chairman, Committee for the
Implementation of Textile Agreements.
[FR Doc. E6–20942 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS
1 The limit has not been adjusted to account for
any imports exported after December 31, 2005.
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Board of Visitors, United States
Military Academy (USMA)
Department of the Army, DoD.
Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: In accordance with Section
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463),
announcement is made of the following
committee meeting:
Name of Committee: Board of
Visitors, United States Military
Academy.
Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2007.
Place of Meeting: Veterans Affairs
Conference room, Room 418, Senate
Russell Building, Washington, DC.
Start Time of Meeting: Approximately
9 a.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lieutenant Colonel Shaun T. Wurzbach,
United States Military Academy, West
Point, NY 10996–5000, (845) 938–4200.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposed
Agenda: Organizational Meeting of the
Board of Visitors. Review of the
Academic, Military and Physical
Programs at the USMA. Elections for
Board of Visitor Leadership positions
will also be held. All proceedings are
open.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–9596 Filed 12–07–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–08–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Notice of Availability of Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Rio del Oro Specific Plan
Project, in the City of Rancho Cordova,
Sacramento County, CA
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
DoD. Sacramento District has prepared
a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) that analyzes the potential effects
of implementing each of five alternative
scenarios for a mixed-use development
in the approximately 3,828-acre Rio del
Oro Specific Plan area, in the City of
Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County,
CA. The EIS documents the existing
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
condition of environmental resources in
and around areas considered for
development, and potential impacts on
those resources as a result of
implementing the alternatives. The
alternatives considered in detail are: (1)
Proposed Project/Proposed Action (i.e.,
Proposed Project Alternative), the
Applicants’ Preferred Alternative; (2)
High Density (Increased Densities
Consistent with Sacramento Area
Council of Governments Blueprint); (3)
Impact Minimization; (4) No Federal
Action (No Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act Permit); and (5) No Project/
No Action (No development).
DATES: All written comments must be
postmarked on or before February 5,
2007. A public hearing will be held on
a date to be determined following the
close of the comment period; notice of
this hearing will be sent to all
appropriate parties at a later date.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted in writing to: Anna Sutton,
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Sacramento District, Regulatory Branch,
1325 J Street, Room 1480, Sacramento,
CA 95814–2922, or via e-mail to
Anna.M.Sutton@spk01.usace.army. mil.
Oral and written comments may also be
submitted at the public hearing
described in the DATES section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna Sutton at (916) 557–7759 or via email at
Anna.M.Sutton@spk01.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Elliott
Homes and GenCorp Realty Investments
(GenCorp), the project applicant(s), are
seeking adoption by the City of Rancho
Cordova of the proposed Rio del Oro
Specific Plan. Elliott Homes is seeking
specific development entitlements (e.g.,
tentative subdivision maps); GenCorp is
seeking overall development
entitlements, but has not proposed
specific development entitlements
necessary for immediate or short-term
development. Both Elliott Homes and
GenCorp are also seeking authorization
from USACE to place dredged or fill
material into waters of the United
States.
Five alternatives are evaluated in
detail in the DEIS. Under the Proposed
Project/Proposed Action (Proposed
Project Alternative), buildout of the
project would be split into five phases
and is anticipated to occur over a 25- to
30-year period. The project provides for
construction of approximately 11,601
residential dwelling units in three
residential land use classifications on
1,920 acres, along with commercial land
uses, neighborhood parks and other uses
such as a landscape corridor and
greenbelt, and several public schools.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
New utilities and communications
infrastructure would be installed and
new roadways and on- and off-site
infrastructure improvements would be
completed. The project designates a
507-acre wetland preserve area and two
elderberry preserve areas on the project
site. The four alternatives to the
Proposed Project/Proposed Action are
described briefly below.
(1) The High Density Alternative
embraces the concept of ‘‘Smart
Growth,’’ consistent with the
Sacramento Area Council of
Governments’ Regional Blueprint
Project. Under Smart Growth principles,
areas planned for development are
developed at higher densities. Although
these higher densities may result in
greater localized impacts on resources,
the overall area of disturbance is
reduced by concentrating development
in particular locations. The total acreage
of residential development would be the
same under this alternative as under the
Proposed Project/Proposed Action, but
approximately 3,800 additional
residential units would be constructed.
The acreage of commercial and
industrial development as well as the
wetland preserve would be the same.
(2) The Impact Minimization
Alternative would reconfigure project
components to reduce impacts on
waters of the United States, including
wetlands and high-quality biological
habitat. An additional 485 acres of the
project site would be designated as part
of the protected wetland preserve; as a
result, approximately 25% of the project
site would become a part of the wetland
preserve. The total acreage of residential
development would be reduced by
approximately 470 acres and
approximately 1,040 fewer residential
units would be constructed, although
overall density would increase because
a greater proportion of residential
acreage would be developed with
medium and high density. Commercial
and industrial development sites would
be slightly reduced.
(3) The No Federal Action Alternative
was designed to allow some
development of the project site while
avoiding the placement of dredged or
fill material into waters of the United
States. Under this alternative, 872 acres
of the project site would be designated
‘‘Natural Resources’’ under the City of
Rancho Cordova General Plan. Land
with this use designation is set aside as
natural habitat with no urban
development; public access into this
area would be prohibited. The types of
land uses would remain the same as
under the Proposed Project/Proposed
Action.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71143
(4) The No Project/No Action
Alternative would preclude
development of the project; under this
alternative the majority of the project
site would remain under the jurisdiction
of the City of Rancho Cordova. This
alternative assumes that aggregate
mining operations to remove portions of
existing dredge tailings at the project
site would continue under existing
Conditional Use Permits. Aggregate
mining operations are not part of the Rio
del Oro project.
USACE invites full public
participation to promote open
communication and better decisionmaking. All persons and organizations
that have an interest in the Rio del Oro
Specific Plan Project are urged to
participate in the NEPA process. A
public hearing will be held as described
in the DATES section. This hearing will
be announced in advance through
notices, media news releases, and/or
mailings.
Copies of the DEIS may be reviewed
at the following locations:
1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
Sacramento District Web site: https://
www.spk.usace.army.mil/organizations/
cespk-co/regulatory/.
2. City of Rancho Cordova City Hall,
2729 Prospect Park Drive, Rancho
Cordova, CA 95670.
3. City of Rancho Cordova Planning
Department Web site: https://
www.cityofranchocordova.org/
city_departments/planning_main.html.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06–9597 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–EZ–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Navy
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement/
Overseas Environmental Impact
Statement for the Virginia Capes
Range Complex and Notice of Public
Scoping Meetings
Department of the Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section
(102)(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of
1969, as implemented by the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40
CFR Parts 1500–1508), and Executive
Order 12114, the Department of the
Navy (DON) announces its intent to
prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS)/Overseas EIS (OEIS) to
evaluate the potential environmental
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71142-71143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9597]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Impact Statement
for the Proposed Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project, in the City of
Rancho Cordova, Sacramento County, CA
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), DoD. Sacramento District has
prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that analyzes
the potential effects of implementing each of five alternative
scenarios for a mixed-use development in the approximately 3,828-acre
Rio del Oro Specific Plan area, in the City of Rancho Cordova,
Sacramento County, CA. The EIS documents the existing
[[Page 71143]]
condition of environmental resources in and around areas considered for
development, and potential impacts on those resources as a result of
implementing the alternatives. The alternatives considered in detail
are: (1) Proposed Project/Proposed Action (i.e., Proposed Project
Alternative), the Applicants' Preferred Alternative; (2) High Density
(Increased Densities Consistent with Sacramento Area Council of
Governments Blueprint); (3) Impact Minimization; (4) No Federal Action
(No Section 404 of the Clean Water Act Permit); and (5) No Project/No
Action (No development).
DATES: All written comments must be postmarked on or before February 5,
2007. A public hearing will be held on a date to be determined
following the close of the comment period; notice of this hearing will
be sent to all appropriate parties at a later date.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted in writing to: Anna Sutton, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, Regulatory Branch, 1325 J
Street, Room 1480, Sacramento, CA 95814-2922, or via e-mail to
Anna.M.Sutton@spk01.usace.army.mil. Oral and written comments may also
be submitted at the public hearing described in the DATES section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna Sutton at (916) 557-7759 or via
e-mail at Anna.M.Sutton@spk01.usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Elliott Homes and GenCorp Realty Investments
(GenCorp), the project applicant(s), are seeking adoption by the City
of Rancho Cordova of the proposed Rio del Oro Specific Plan. Elliott
Homes is seeking specific development entitlements (e.g., tentative
subdivision maps); GenCorp is seeking overall development entitlements,
but has not proposed specific development entitlements necessary for
immediate or short-term development. Both Elliott Homes and GenCorp are
also seeking authorization from USACE to place dredged or fill material
into waters of the United States.
Five alternatives are evaluated in detail in the DEIS. Under the
Proposed Project/Proposed Action (Proposed Project Alternative),
buildout of the project would be split into five phases and is
anticipated to occur over a 25- to 30-year period. The project provides
for construction of approximately 11,601 residential dwelling units in
three residential land use classifications on 1,920 acres, along with
commercial land uses, neighborhood parks and other uses such as a
landscape corridor and greenbelt, and several public schools. New
utilities and communications infrastructure would be installed and new
roadways and on- and off-site infrastructure improvements would be
completed. The project designates a 507-acre wetland preserve area and
two elderberry preserve areas on the project site. The four
alternatives to the Proposed Project/Proposed Action are described
briefly below.
(1) The High Density Alternative embraces the concept of ``Smart
Growth,'' consistent with the Sacramento Area Council of Governments'
Regional Blueprint Project. Under Smart Growth principles, areas
planned for development are developed at higher densities. Although
these higher densities may result in greater localized impacts on
resources, the overall area of disturbance is reduced by concentrating
development in particular locations. The total acreage of residential
development would be the same under this alternative as under the
Proposed Project/Proposed Action, but approximately 3,800 additional
residential units would be constructed. The acreage of commercial and
industrial development as well as the wetland preserve would be the
same.
(2) The Impact Minimization Alternative would reconfigure project
components to reduce impacts on waters of the United States, including
wetlands and high-quality biological habitat. An additional 485 acres
of the project site would be designated as part of the protected
wetland preserve; as a result, approximately 25% of the project site
would become a part of the wetland preserve. The total acreage of
residential development would be reduced by approximately 470 acres and
approximately 1,040 fewer residential units would be constructed,
although overall density would increase because a greater proportion of
residential acreage would be developed with medium and high density.
Commercial and industrial development sites would be slightly reduced.
(3) The No Federal Action Alternative was designed to allow some
development of the project site while avoiding the placement of dredged
or fill material into waters of the United States. Under this
alternative, 872 acres of the project site would be designated
``Natural Resources'' under the City of Rancho Cordova General Plan.
Land with this use designation is set aside as natural habitat with no
urban development; public access into this area would be prohibited.
The types of land uses would remain the same as under the Proposed
Project/Proposed Action.
(4) The No Project/No Action Alternative would preclude development
of the project; under this alternative the majority of the project site
would remain under the jurisdiction of the City of Rancho Cordova. This
alternative assumes that aggregate mining operations to remove portions
of existing dredge tailings at the project site would continue under
existing Conditional Use Permits. Aggregate mining operations are not
part of the Rio del Oro project.
USACE invites full public participation to promote open
communication and better decision-making. All persons and organizations
that have an interest in the Rio del Oro Specific Plan Project are
urged to participate in the NEPA process. A public hearing will be held
as described in the DATES section. This hearing will be announced in
advance through notices, media news releases, and/or mailings.
Copies of the DEIS may be reviewed at the following locations:
1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District Web site:
https://www.spk.usace.army.mil/organizations/cespk-co/regulatory/
index.html.
2. City of Rancho Cordova City Hall, 2729 Prospect Park Drive,
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670.
3. City of Rancho Cordova Planning Department Web site: https://
www.cityofranchocordova.org/city_departments/planning_main.html.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 06-9597 Filed 12-7-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-EZ-M