Chrome Fire Salvage Recovery Project, Malheur National Forest, Grant County, OR, 71121-71122 [06-9594]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such
confidentiality should be aware that
under the FOIA, confidentiality may be
granted in only very limited
circumstances such as to protect trade
secrets. The Forest Service will inform
the requester of the agency’s decisions
regarding the request for confidentiality,
and where the request is denied; the
agency will return the submission and
notify the requester that the comments
may be resubmitted with or without
name and address within a specified
number of days.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the draft
environmental impact statement will be
45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register. The Forest Service
believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of
several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental
review process. First, reviewers of draft
environmental impact statements must
structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so
that it is meaningful and alerts an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553
(1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:05 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
71121
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day, Oregon
97845. Send electronic comments to:
comments-pacificnorthwestmalheur@fs.fed.us.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: December 4, 2006.
Gay L. Benes,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06–9593 Filed 12–7–06; 8:45 am]
The purpose and need of the Chrome
Fire Salvage Recovery Project includes:
(1) Recovery of the economic value of a
portion of the dead and dying trees
consistent with protection of other
resource values; and (2) Improving
public safety within the fire area by
removing potential hazard trees for
public safety along open forest travel
routes.
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
Jerry
Hensley, Project Manager, Malheur
National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge
Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day, Oregon,
telephone 541–575–3167, e-mail
jhensley@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Proposed Action
Forest Service
This action includes salvage of dead
and dying trees from approximately
3,472 acres and removal of potential
hazard trees for public safety along open
forest travel routes. Salvage harvest
methods would include ground-based
and helicopter logging systems.
Approximately 70 percent of the harvest
area would be salvaged by helicopter.
No commercial harvest or road
construction is proposed within
Appendix C Inventoried Dry Cabin,
Cedar Grove and Shake Table Roadless
Areas. Road activities associated with
salvage and restoration will be limited
to reconstruction, opening and reclosing existing roads, and maintenance.
No new roads would be built. Following
site preparation, approximately 3,472
acres would be planted with conifer
seedlings. Forest Plan amendments,
related to old growth replacement, snag
levels, visuals, timber harvest within
Semi-Primitive Non-Motorized
Recreation Areas, etc. would be
included as needed.
Chrome Fire Salvage Recovery Project,
Malheur National Forest, Grant County,
OR
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will
prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to disclose
environmental effects on a proposed
action to recover the economic value of
dead and dying trees damaged in the
Shake Table Fire Complex, and remove
potential hazard trees from open forest
travel routes within the Todd, Duncan,
Fields Creek and Dry Creek
subwatersheds. The Shake Table Fire
Complex, located approximately 20
miles south west of John Day, Oregon,
burned approximately 14,527 acres
across mixed ownership in August
2006, of that approximately 13,536 acres
were on National Forest System Lands
administered by the Blue Mountain
Ranger District, Malheur National
Forest. The proposed action is the
Chrome Fire Salvage Recovery Project.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by
January 8, 2007. The Draft EIS is
expected to be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and be available to the public for review
by July 2007. The Final EIS is scheduled
to be completed by September 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
the Responsible Official, Gary L. ‘‘Stan’’
Benes, Forest Supervisor, Malheur
National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Possible Alternatives
Alternatives will include the
proposed action, no action, and
additional alternatives that respond to
issues generated during the scoping
process. The agency will give notice of
the full environmental analysis and
decision-making process to interested
and affected people may participate and
contribute to the final decision.
Responsible Official and Nature of
Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official is Gary L.
‘‘Stan’’ Benes, Forest Supervisor of the
Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
71122
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 236 / Friday, December 8, 2006 / Notices
Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day,
OR 97845. The Responsible Official will
decide if the proposed project will be
implemented and will document the
decision and reasons for the decision in
a Record of Decision. That decision will
be subject to Forest Service Appeal
Regulations. The responsibility for
preparing the DEIS and FEIS has been
delegated to Brooks Smith, Acting
District Ranger, Blue Mountain Ranger
District.
Scoping Process
Public participation will be especially
important at several points during the
analysis, beginning with the scoping
process (40 CFR 1501.7). Initial scoping
began with the project listed in the 2006
Fall Edition of the Malheur National
Forest’s Schedule of Proposed Actions.
A Public meeting has been planned for
January 2007 to discuss the project.
Other meetings will be scheduled as
needed. Also, correspondence with
tribes, government agencies,
organizations, and individuals who
have indicated their interest will be
conducted.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues identified include
the potential effect of the proposed
action on: soils, water quality and fish
habitat, snags and down wood,
disturbance to cultural resources,
potential for noxious weed expansion,
threatened, endangered and sensitive
aquatic, terrestrial and plant species,
potential loss of economic value of trees
damaged by wildfire, and the safety and
use of the area by public and land
managers.
Comment
Public comments about this proposal
are requested to identify issues and
alternatives to the proposed action and
to focus the scope of the analysis.
Comments received in response to this
solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be considered part of the public record
on this proposed action, and will be
available for public inspection.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
those who submit anonymous
comments will not have standing to
appeal the subsequent decisions under
36 CFR Parts 215 or 217. Additionally,
pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person
may request the agency to withhold a
submission from the public record by
showing how the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such
confidentiality should be aware that
under the FOIA, confidentiality may be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:22 Dec 07, 2006
Jkt 211001
granted in only very limited
circumstances such as to protect trade
secrets. The Forest Service will
information the requester of the
agency’s decision regarding the request
for confidentiality, and where the
request is denied; the agency will return
the submission and notify the requester
that the comments may be resubmitted
with or without name and address
within a specified number of days.
Early Notice of Importance of Public
Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact
statement will be prepared for comment.
The comment period on the draft
environmental impact statement will be
45 days from the date the
Environmental Protection agency
publishes the notice of availability in
the Federal Register. The Forest Service
believes, at this early stage, it is
important to give reviewers notice of
several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental
review process. First, reviewers of draft
environmental impact statements must
structure their participation in the
environmental review of the proposal so
that it is meaningful and alerts an
agency to the reviewer’s position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear
Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 553
(1978). Also, environmental objections
that could be raised at the draft
environmental impact statement stage
but that are not raised until after
completion of the final environmental
impact statement may be waived or
dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon
v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir.
1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v.
Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D.
Wis. 1980). Because of these court
rulings, it is very important that those
interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day
comment period so that substantive
comments and objections are made
available to the Forest Service at a time
when it can meaningfully consider them
and respond to them in the final
environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in
identifying and considering issues and
concerns on the proposed action,
comments on the draft environmental
impact statement should be as specific
as possible. It is also helpful if
comments refer to specific pages or
chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the
adequacy of the draft environmental
impact statement or the merits of the
alternatives formulated and discussed in
the statement. Reviewers may wish to
refer to the council on Environmental
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the
National environmental Policy Act at 40
CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the
public record on this proposal and will
be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22;
Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section
21)
Dated: December 4, 2006.
Gary L. Benes,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06–9594 Filed 12–07–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
Opportunity for Designation in the
Muncie (IN), Fremont (NE), Savage
(MN), and West Lafayette (IN) Areas,
and Request for Comments on the
Official Agencies Serving These Areas
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The designations of the
official agencies listed below will end
on June 30, 2007. We are asking persons
interested in providing official services
in the areas served by these agencies to
submit an application for designation.
We are also asking for comments on the
quality of services provided by these
currently designated agencies: East
Indiana Grain Inspection, Inc. (East
Indiana); Fremont Grain Inspection
Department, Inc. (Fremont); State Grain
Inspection, Inc. (State Grain); and Titus
Grain Inspection, Inc. (Titus).
DATES: Applications and comments
must be received on or before January 8,
2007.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit
applications and comments on this
notice. You may submit applications
and comments by any of the following
methods:
* Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
to Karen Guagliardo, Review Branch
Chief, Compliance Division, GIPSA,
USDA, Room 1647–S, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250.
* Fax: Send by facsimile
transmission to (202) 690–2755,
attention: Karen Guagliardo.
* E-mail: Send via electronic mail to
Karen.W.Guagliardo@usda.gov.
* Mail: Send hardcopy to Karen
Guagliardo, Review Branch Chief,
E:\FR\FM\08DEN1.SGM
08DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 236 (Friday, December 8, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71121-71122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-9594]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Chrome Fire Salvage Recovery Project, Malheur National Forest,
Grant County, OR
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact
statement (EIS) to disclose environmental effects on a proposed action
to recover the economic value of dead and dying trees damaged in the
Shake Table Fire Complex, and remove potential hazard trees from open
forest travel routes within the Todd, Duncan, Fields Creek and Dry
Creek subwatersheds. The Shake Table Fire Complex, located
approximately 20 miles south west of John Day, Oregon, burned
approximately 14,527 acres across mixed ownership in August 2006, of
that approximately 13,536 acres were on National Forest System Lands
administered by the Blue Mountain Ranger District, Malheur National
Forest. The proposed action is the Chrome Fire Salvage Recovery
Project.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by January 8, 2007. The Draft EIS is expected to be filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and be available to the public
for review by July 2007. The Final EIS is scheduled to be completed by
September 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to the Responsible Official, Gary L.
``Stan'' Benes, Forest Supervisor, Malheur National Forest, 431
Patterson Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day, Oregon 97845. Send
electronic comments to: comments-pacificnorthwest-malheur@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Hensley, Project Manager,
Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John
Day, Oregon, telephone 541-575-3167, e-mail jhensley@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The purpose and need of the Chrome Fire Salvage Recovery Project
includes: (1) Recovery of the economic value of a portion of the dead
and dying trees consistent with protection of other resource values;
and (2) Improving public safety within the fire area by removing
potential hazard trees for public safety along open forest travel
routes.
Proposed Action
This action includes salvage of dead and dying trees from
approximately 3,472 acres and removal of potential hazard trees for
public safety along open forest travel routes. Salvage harvest methods
would include ground-based and helicopter logging systems.
Approximately 70 percent of the harvest area would be salvaged by
helicopter. No commercial harvest or road construction is proposed
within Appendix C Inventoried Dry Cabin, Cedar Grove and Shake Table
Roadless Areas. Road activities associated with salvage and restoration
will be limited to reconstruction, opening and re-closing existing
roads, and maintenance. No new roads would be built. Following site
preparation, approximately 3,472 acres would be planted with conifer
seedlings. Forest Plan amendments, related to old growth replacement,
snag levels, visuals, timber harvest within Semi-Primitive Non-
Motorized Recreation Areas, etc. would be included as needed.
Possible Alternatives
Alternatives will include the proposed action, no action, and
additional alternatives that respond to issues generated during the
scoping process. The agency will give notice of the full environmental
analysis and decision-making process to interested and affected people
may participate and contribute to the final decision.
Responsible Official and Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Responsible Official is Gary L. ``Stan'' Benes, Forest
Supervisor of the Malheur National Forest, 431 Patterson
[[Page 71122]]
Bridge Road, P.O. Box 909, John Day, OR 97845. The Responsible Official
will decide if the proposed project will be implemented and will
document the decision and reasons for the decision in a Record of
Decision. That decision will be subject to Forest Service Appeal
Regulations. The responsibility for preparing the DEIS and FEIS has
been delegated to Brooks Smith, Acting District Ranger, Blue Mountain
Ranger District.
Scoping Process
Public participation will be especially important at several points
during the analysis, beginning with the scoping process (40 CFR
1501.7). Initial scoping began with the project listed in the 2006 Fall
Edition of the Malheur National Forest's Schedule of Proposed Actions.
A Public meeting has been planned for January 2007 to discuss the
project. Other meetings will be scheduled as needed. Also,
correspondence with tribes, government agencies, organizations, and
individuals who have indicated their interest will be conducted.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues identified include the potential effect of the
proposed action on: soils, water quality and fish habitat, snags and
down wood, disturbance to cultural resources, potential for noxious
weed expansion, threatened, endangered and sensitive aquatic,
terrestrial and plant species, potential loss of economic value of
trees damaged by wildfire, and the safety and use of the area by public
and land managers.
Comment
Public comments about this proposal are requested to identify
issues and alternatives to the proposed action and to focus the scope
of the analysis. Comments received in response to this solicitation,
including names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered
part of the public record on this proposed action, and will be
available for public inspection. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered; however, those who submit anonymous comments
will not have standing to appeal the subsequent decisions under 36 CFR
Parts 215 or 217. Additionally, pursuant to 7 CFR 1.27(d), any person
may request the agency to withhold a submission from the public record
by showing how the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) permits such
confidentiality. Persons requesting such confidentiality should be
aware that under the FOIA, confidentiality may be granted in only very
limited circumstances such as to protect trade secrets. The Forest
Service will information the requester of the agency's decision
regarding the request for confidentiality, and where the request is
denied; the agency will return the submission and notify the requester
that the comments may be resubmitted with or without name and address
within a specified number of days.
Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent
Environmental Review
A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for
comment. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement
will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection agency
publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The
Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give
reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings,
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action
participate by the close of the 45-day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to
them in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
and concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft
environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is
also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the
draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft
environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives
formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer
to the council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing
the procedural provisions of the National environmental Policy Act at
40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook
1909.15, Section 21)
Dated: December 4, 2006.
Gary L. Benes,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 06-9594 Filed 12-07-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M