Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant Proposals:, 71016-71022 [E6-20785]
Download as PDF
71016
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
extension of the Memorandum of
Understanding between the Government
of the United States of America and the
Government of the Republic of Cyprus
Concerning the Imposition of Import
Restrictions on Pre-Classical and
Classical Archaeological Objects which
entered into force on July 19, 2002, and
was amended on September 4, 2006, to
include the aforementioned Byzantine
Period materials that had been restricted
from importation pursuant to prior
emergency action.
Pursuant to the authority vested in the
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to the
requirement under 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1),
an extension of this Memorandum of
Understanding is hereby proposed.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the
views and recommendations of the
Cultural Property Advisory Committee
regarding this proposal will be
requested.
A copy of this Memorandum of
Understanding, the designated list of
restricted categories of material, and
related information can be found at the
following Web site: https://
exchanges.state.gov/culprop.
Dated: November 28, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–20791 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5624]
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Notice of Proposal To Extend the
Memorandum of Understanding
Between the Government of the United
States of America and the Government
of the Republic of Peru Concerning the
Imposition of Import Restrictions on
Archaeological Material From the PreHispanic Cultures and Certain
Ethnological Material From the
Colonial Period of Peru
The Government of the Republic of
Peru has informed the Government of
the United States of its interest in an
extension of the Memorandum of
Understanding between the Government
of the United States of America and the
Government of the Republic of Peru
Concerning the Imposition of Import
Restrictions on Archaeological Material
from the Pre-Hispanic Cultures and
Certain Ethnological Material from the
Colonial Period of Peru, which entered
into force on June 9, 1997 and extended
on June 9, 2002.
Pursuant to the authority vested in the
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to the
requirement under 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1),
an extension of this Memorandum of
Understanding is hereby proposed.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the
views and recommendations of the
Cultural Property Advisory Committee
regarding this proposal will be
requested.
A copy of this Memorandum of
Understanding, the designated list of
restricted categories of material, and
related information can be found at the
following Web site: https://
exchanges.state.gov/culprop.
Dated: November 28, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–20792 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5634]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs (ECA) Request for Grant
Proposals:
Fusion Arts Exchange programs on:
Music Composition and Performance;
Digital Media and Computer-Assisted
Design; Screenwriting and Film
Production; Sports Management
Announcement Type: New
Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/
A/E/USS–07–FAX.
Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Application Deadline:
February 9, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Branch for
the Study of the United States, Office of
Academic Exchange Programs, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
invites proposal submissions for the
design and implementation of four
Fusion Arts Exchange programs. The
programs will take place over the course
of 37 days beginning the second week
of July 2007, focused on the themes of
Music Composition and Performance,
Digital Media and Computer-Assisted
Design, Screenwriting and Film
Production, and Sports Management,
respectively. These programs should
provide a multinational group of
outstanding undergraduate students a
deeper understanding of U.S. society,
culture, values and institutions, and
should develop their knowledge of and
abilities in the above-mentioned
professional fields. Each program will
host a total of 15 international
participants from five Bureaudesignated countries, as well as three to
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
five American undergraduate students
who will participate alongside their
international peers. Prospective
applicants may only apply to host one
of the four programs listed under this
competition; host institutions may not
implement more than one Fusion Arts
Exchange program concurrently.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making
authority for this program is contained
in the Mutual Educational and Cultural
Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87–
256, as amended, also known as the
Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the
Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the
United States to increase mutual
understanding between the people of
the United States and the people of
other countries * * *; to strengthen the
ties which unite us with other nations
by demonstrating the educational and
cultural interests, developments, and
achievements of the people of the
United States and other nations * * *
and thus to assist in the development of
friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and
the other countries of the world.’’ The
funding authority for the program above
is provided through legislation.
Purpose: The Fusion Arts Exchange
consists of four multinational exchange
programs, whose purpose is to provide
outstanding undergraduate students an
intensive, collaborative course on the
latest developments in their respective
fields (music composition and
performance; digital media and
computer-assisted design; screenwriting
and film production; and sports
management), and in the history and
culture of the U.S. as illuminated
through the lens of their fields.
Participants will also learn about careers
and economic development
opportunities for their communities
related to their field, and have the
chance to develop on-going
collaborations with their fellow
participants.
The Bureau is seeking detailed
proposals for four different Fusion Arts
Exchange programs from U.S. colleges,
universities, consortia of colleges and
universities, and other not-for-profit
academic organizations that have an
established reputation in a field or
discipline related to the specific
program themes.
Overview: Each program should be 37
days in length, and should include an
academic residency component and an
educational study tour component.
The academic residency component
should run for no less than 25 days and
occur in and around the host
institution’s facilities. It should include
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
professional seminars, workshops,
roundtable discussions, lectures and
local site visits. It should also devote
time to allow Fusion Arts Exchange
participants to shadow local
professionals in their field.
The educational study tour should
run for no less than nine days and
should directly complement the
academic residency component. It
should consist of travel to sites of
significance to the professional fields of
Fusion Arts Exchange participants, and
offer participants an immersive,
firsthand experience of professional
issues central to their specialization. It
should include visits to another
geographic region of the country, and
access to leading organizations and
individuals in the program’s field that
are not locally available. It should also
provide for two to three days in
Washington, DC, at the conclusion of
the program. If appropriate, the
educational study tour component may
be interspersed with the residency
portion of the program.
Upon completion of the program, the
host institution will also be expected to
provide participants with guidance and
resources for further investigation and
research on the topics and issues
examined during the program after they
return home.
The Fusion Arts Exchange Program
on Music Composition and Performance
should provide a multinational group of
18–20 experienced and highlymotivated undergraduates with an
intensive, collaborative course on music
composition and performance. The core
of the program should consist of
opportunities for individual and
collaborative music composition,
individual musical coaching,
instrument-specific instruction, group
lessons, and individual and group
performance opportunities. Participants
should have access to the highest
quality music study and performance
facilities at the host institution, and the
latest developments in music recording
and production should be addressed. A
key component of the program should
be an introductory course exploring
American history, values and culture
through the lens of American music,
which should be integrated into the
curriculum for its entirety and provide
a framework for the exchange
experience. Participants should learn
from leading music academics and
professionals about careers and current
and potential economic development
opportunities related to music in the
participants’ home countries. They
should be given ample opportunity to
develop on-going collaborations with
their fellow participants. Bureau-
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
designated participating countries for
this program may include: Brazil, India,
Ireland, Mali, South Africa, and the
United States. One award of up to
$280,000 (not to exceed $14,000 per
participant, including American
participants) will support this program.
This award will not include funds for
participant international travel to and
from the United States, which will be
the separate responsibility of the
Department.
The Fusion Arts Exchange Program
on Digital Media and ComputerAssisted Design should provide a
multinational group of 18–20
experienced and highly-motivated
undergraduates with an intensive,
collaborative course on digital media
and computer-assisted design. The
program should cover the major topics
and latest developments in interactive
digital media, including animation; Web
design; print layout and production;
multimedia-print interfacing; digital
photography production; game
development; digital media research;
and new forms of computer-related
expression. The program should be
designed to provide immersive, handson training. Participants should have
access to the highest quality digital
media facilities at the host institution,
and the latest developments in digital
media should be thoroughly addressed.
The program should also offer
opportunities to learn from leading
digital media academics and
professionals about careers and current
and potential economic development
opportunities related to digital media in
the participants’ home countries. A key
component of the program should be an
introductory course exploring American
history, values and culture through
American historical and contemporary
visual art and communications,
including fine art, visual advertising,
Web-based media, and political cartoons
or other art advocating a social
movement or cause, which should be
integrated into the curriculum for its
entirety and provide a framework for the
exchange experience. Participants
should be given ample opportunity to
develop on-going collaborations with
their fellow participants. Bureaudesignated participating countries for
this program may include: Argentina,
Japan, Jordan, South Korea, and the
United States. One award of up to
$280,000 (not to exceed $14,000 per
participant, including American
participants) will support this program.
This award will not include funds for
participant international travel to and
from the United States, which will be
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71017
the separate responsibility of the
Department.
The Fusion Arts Exchange Program
on Screenwriting and Film Production
should provide a multinational group of
18–20 experienced and highlymotivated undergraduates with an
intensive, collaborative course on
screenwriting within the context of
current film production techniques and
standards. The core of the program
should consist of an immersive, handson, production-oriented screenwriting
workshop. Participants should have
access to the highest quality film
production facilities at the host
institution, and the latest developments
in film production as they relate to
screenwriting should be thoroughly
addressed. The program should also
cover the major topics in film and
television, including production,
direction, cinematography, sound
design, and editing, as they relate to
screenwriting. Participants should have
ample opportunity to learn from
academics and working professionals
about careers and current and potential
economic development opportunities
related to the film and television
industries in the participants’ home
countries. A key component of the
program should be an introductory
course exploring American history,
values and culture as seen through
American film, which should be
integrated into the curriculum for its
entirety and provide a framework for the
exchange experience. Participants
should be given ample opportunity to
develop on-going collaborations with
their fellow participants. Bureaudesignated participating countries for
this program may include countries in
Europe, Asia, Africa and the United
States. One award of up to $280,000 (not
to exceed $14,000 per participant,
including American participants) will
support this program. This award will
not include funds for participant
international travel to and from the
United States, which will be the
separate responsibility of the
Department.
The Fusion Arts Exchange Program
on Sports Management should provide
a multinational group of 18–20
experienced and highly-motivated
undergraduates with an intensive,
collaborative course on the business of
sports management. The program
should cover the major topics in sports
management, including marketing
sports properties; sponsorship alliances;
athlete, owner and fan relations;
contractual negotiations; media
licensing and other forms of licensing;
women’s sports development; and the
economic and legal aspects of sports
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
71018
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
management. Participants should have
ample opportunity to learn from
academics and working professionals
about careers and current and potential
economic development opportunities
related to the sports management
profession in the participants’ home
countries. A key component of the
program should be an introductory
course exploring American history,
values and culture through the lens of
American sports history and culture,
including films and literature about
sports, which should be integrated into
the curriculum for its entirety and
provide a framework for the exchange
experience. Participants should be given
ample opportunity to develop on-going
collaborations with their fellow
participants. Bureau-designated
participating countries for this program
may include: Indonesia, Nigeria, Russia,
Turkey, Venezuela, and the United
States. One award of up to $280,000 (not
to exceed $14,000 per participant,
including American participants) will
support this program. This award will
not include funds for participant
international travel to and from the
United States, which will be the
separate responsibility of the
Department.
Program Design: Each Fusion Arts
Exchange program should be designed
as an intensive, interactive,
academically rigorous seminar for an
experienced group of undergraduate
students from abroad and from the U.S.
Each program should be organized
through an integrated series of
individual and group training
workshops, lectures, readings, seminar
discussions, public presentation
opportunities, and regional travel and
site visits. Applicants are encouraged to
design creative, thematically coherent
programs that draw upon the particular
strengths, faculty and resources of their
institutions as well as upon the
nationally recognized expertise of
scholars, professionals, artists and other
experts throughout the United States.
Academic facilities devoted to the
program must be of the highest quality
and should feature state-of-the-art
technology. Applicants should clearly
outline the facilities they propose to
devote to the program and justify that
they meet the above criteria.
Program Administration: Each Fusion
Arts Exchange program should
designate an academic director who will
be present throughout the program to
ensure the continuity, coherence and
integration of all aspects of the
academic program, including the
educational study tour. In addition to
the academic director, an administrative
director or coordinator should be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
assigned to oversee all participant
support services, including close
oversight of the program participants,
and budgetary, logistical, and other
administrative arrangements. The
administrative director or coordinator
should be the Bureau’s primary point of
contact.
International Participants: Fifteen
international participants per program
will be nominated by U.S. Embassies
and Fulbright Commissions from the
five above-mentioned Bureaudesignated countries for each program.
Final selection will be made by the
Bureau’s Branch for the Study of the
United States. Every effort will be made
to select a balanced mix of male and
female participants. International
participants will be diverse in terms of
academic and professional background.
All international participants will have
a good knowledge of English.
Participants may or may not come from
educational institutions where the study
of their specialization is relatively welldeveloped. Preference will be given in
the selection process to participants
with no or limited experience with the
United States, although some may have
visited the United States previously. In
all cases, participants will be
accomplished undergraduate students,
who will be prepared to participate in
an intellectually, professionally and/or
artistically rigorous academic seminar
that offers a collegial atmosphere
conducive to collaborative work and
exchange of ideas.
American Participants: Three to five
American undergraduate students,
outstanding in their respective fields,
should be competitively selected by
each host institution as participants in
its program. No more than one
American participant per program may
be a current or past student of that
program’s host institution. These
American participants will participate
in all aspects of the Fusion Arts
Exchange program, living and working
collaboratively with their international
peers. Prospective host institutions will
be evaluated on their ability to recruit
appropriate American participants.
American participants should be both
exemplary cultural representatives of
the United States and experienced in
the discipline of the Fusion Arts
Exchange for which they have been
selected. In all cases, participants
should be accomplished undergraduate
students, who will be prepared to
participate in an intellectually,
professionally and/or artistically
rigorous academic seminar that offers a
collegial atmosphere conducive to
collaborative work and exchange of
ideas. Every effort should be made to
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
select a balanced mix of male and
female participants.
Program Dates: Proposed programs
should be a maximum of 37 days in
length (including participant arrival and
departure days) and should begin
during the second week of July 2007.
Program Guidelines: It is essential
that proposals provide a detailed and
comprehensive narrative describing the
objectives of the program; the title,
scope and content of each session;
planned site visits; and how each
session relates to the overall program
professional focus and themes. A
syllabus must be included that indicates
the subject matter for each lecture, panel
discussion, group presentation or other
activity. The syllabus should also
confirm or provisionally identify
proposed speakers, trainers, and session
leaders, and clearly show how assigned
readings will advance the goals of each
session. A calendar of all program
activities must be included in the
proposal, as well as a description of
plans for public and media outreach in
connection with the program. Overall,
proposals will be reviewed on the basis
of their responsiveness to RFGP criteria,
coherence, clarity, and attention to
detail.
Please note: In a cooperative agreement,
the Branch for the Study of the United States
is substantially involved in program
activities above and beyond routine grant
monitoring. The Branch will assume the
following responsibilities for each Fusion
Arts Exchange program: participate in the
selection of international participants;
oversee the program through regular contact
with the administrator(s) and one or more
site visits; debrief participants in
Washington, DC at the conclusion of the
program; and engage in follow-on
communication with the participants after
they return to their home countries. The
Branch may request that the host institution
make modifications to the academic
residency and/or educational travel
components of the program. The recipient
will be required to obtain approval of
significant program changes in advance of
their implementation.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative
Agreement. ECA’s level of involvement
in this program is listed under number
I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY–2007.
Approximate Total Funding:
$1,120,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 4.
Approximate Average Award:
$280,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $280,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending
availability of funds, March 1, 2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date:
August 18, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Additional Information: Pending
successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in
subsequent fiscal years, it is ECA’s
intent to renew this grant for two
additional fiscal years, before openly
competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications
may be submitted by public and private
non-profit organizations meeting the
provisions described in Internal
Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds:
There is no minimum or maximum
percentage required for this
competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide
maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is
understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of
cost sharing as stipulated in its proposal
and later included in an approved grant
agreement. Cost sharing may be in the
form of allowable direct or indirect
costs. For accountability, you must
maintain written records to support all
costs which are claimed as your
contribution, as well as costs to be paid
by the Federal government. Such
records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and
in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A–110,
(Revised), Subpart C.23—Cost Sharing
and Matching. In the event you do not
provide the minimum amount of cost
sharing as stipulated in the approved
budget, ECA’s contribution will be
reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
a. Grants awarded to eligible
organizations with less than four years
of experience in conducting
international exchange programs will be
limited to $60,000. ECA anticipates
awarding four grants, in amount over
$60,0000 to support program and
administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program.
Therefore, organizations with less than
four years experience in conducting
international exchanges are ineligible to
apply under this competition. The
Bureau encourages applicants to
provide maximum levels of cost sharing
and funding in support of its programs.
b. Technical Eligibility: It is the
Bureau’s intent to award four separate
cooperative agreements to four different
institutions under this competition.
Therefore prospective applicants may
only submit one proposal under this
competition. All applicants must
comply with this requirement. Should
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
an applicant submit multiple proposals
under this competition, all proposals
will be declared technically ineligible
and given no further consideration in
the review process.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
Note: Please read the complete
announcement before sending inquiries or
submitting proposals. Once the RFGP
deadline has passed, Bureau staff may not
discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been
completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request
an Application Package: Please contact
the Branch for the Study of the United
States, ECA/A/E/USS, Room 314, U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, 301 4th
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547; tel.
(202) 453–8540; fax (202) 453–8533 to
request a Solicitation Package. Please
refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/A/E/USS–07–FAX located
at the top of this announcement when
making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic
application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f.
for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the
Proposal Submission Instruction (PSI)
document which consists of required
application forms, and standard
guidelines for proposal preparation. It
also contains the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific
information, award criteria and budget
instructions tailored to this competition.
For specific questions on the Fusion
Arts Exchange programs, please specify
Adam Van Loon, VanLoonAE@state.gov
and refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/A/E/USS–07–FAX located
at the top of this announcement on all
other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation
Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be
downloaded from the Bureau’s Web site
at https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
rfgps/menu.htm, or from the Grants.gov
website at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before
downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of
Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package.
The application should be submitted
per the instructions under IV.3f.
‘‘Application Deadline and Methods of
Submission’’ section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun
and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to
apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71019
This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely
identifies business entities. Obtaining a
DUNS number is easy and there is no
charge. To obtain a DUNS number,
access https://
www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1–
866–705–5711. Please ensure that your
DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF–424 which is
part of the formal application package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an
executive summary, proposal narrative
and budget.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
document and the Project Objectives,
Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document for additional formatting and
technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status
with the IRS at the time of application.
If your organization is a private
nonprofit which has not received a grant
or cooperative agreement from ECA in
the past three years, or if your
organization received nonprofit status
from the IRS within the past four years,
you must submit the necessary
documentation to verify nonprofit status
as directed in the PSI document. Failure
to do so will cause your proposal to be
declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration
the following information when
preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations
Governing the J Visa. The Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs is
placing renewed emphasis on the secure
and proper administration of Exchange
Visitor (J visa) Programs and adherence
by grantees and sponsors to all
regulations governing the J visa.
Therefore, proposals should
demonstrate the applicant’s capacity to
meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor
Programs as set forth in 22 CFR 62,
including the oversight of Responsible
Officers and Alternate Responsible
Officers, screening and selection of
program participants, provision of prearrival information and orientation to
participants, monitoring of participants,
proper maintenance and security of
forms, record-keeping, reporting and
other requirements.
ECA will be responsible for issuing
DS–2019 forms to participants in this
program.
A copy of the complete regulations
governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is
available at https://exchanges.state.gov
or from: United States Department of
State, Office of Exchange Coordination
and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD—SA–44,
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
71020
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547, Telephone:
(202) 203–5029, FAX: (202) 453–8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for
further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and
Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to the
Bureau’s authorizing legislation,
programs must maintain a non-political
character and should be balanced and
representative of the diversity of
American political, social, and cultural
life. ‘‘Diversity’’ should be interpreted
in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to
ethnicity, race, gender, religion,
geographic location, socio-economic
status, and disabilities. Applicants are
strongly encouraged to adhere to the
advancement of this principle both in
program administration and in program
content. Please refer to the review
criteria under the ‘Support for Diversity’
section for specific suggestions on
incorporating diversity into your
proposal. Public Law 104–319 provides
that ‘‘in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in
countries whose people do not fully
enjoy freedom and democracy,’’ the
Bureau ‘‘shall take appropriate steps to
provide opportunities for participation
in such programs to human rights and
democracy leaders of such countries.’’
Public Law 106–113 requires that the
governments of the countries described
above do not have inappropriate
influence in the selection process.
Proposals should reflect advancement of
these goals in their program contents, to
the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and
Evaluation. Proposals must include a
plan to monitor and evaluate the
project’s success, both as the activities
unfold and at the end of the program.
The Bureau recommends that your
proposal include a draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus a
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original project
objectives. The Bureau expects that the
grantee will track participants or
partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including
satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in
behavior as a result of the program, and
effects of the program on institutions
(institutions in which participants work
or partner institutions). The evaluation
plan should include indicators that
measure gains in mutual understanding
as well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation
depend heavily on setting clear goals
and outcomes at the outset of a program.
Your evaluation plan should include a
description of your project’s objectives,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
your anticipated project outcomes, and
how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance
indicators). The more that outcomes are
‘‘smart’’ (specific, measurable,
attainable, results-oriented, and placed
in a reasonable time frame), the easier
it will be to conduct the evaluation. You
should also show how your project
objectives link to the goals of the
program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan
should clearly distinguish between
program outputs and outcomes. Outputs
are products and services delivered,
often stated as an amount. Output
information is important to show the
scope or size of project activities, but it
cannot substitute for information about
progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs
include the number of people trained or
the number of seminars conducted.
Outcomes, in contrast, represent
specific results a project is intended to
achieve and is usually measured as an
extent of change. Findings on outputs
and outcomes should both be reported,
but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the
following four levels of outcomes, as
they relate to the program goals set out
in the RFGP (listed here in increasing
order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the
program and exchange experience.
2. Participant learning, such as
increased knowledge, aptitude, skills,
and changed understanding and
attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning
and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete
actions to apply knowledge in work or
community; greater participation and
responsibility in civic organizations;
interpretation and explanation of
experiences and new knowledge gained;
continued contacts between
participants, community members, and
others.
4. Institutional changes, such as
increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new
programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given
to the appropriate timing of data collection
for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a shortterm outcome, whereas behavior and
institutional changes are normally
considered longer-term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your
monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) Specifies
intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will
be measured; (3) identifies when
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
particular outcomes will be measured;
and (4) provides a clear description of
the data collection strategies for each
outcome (i.e., surveys, interviews, or
focus groups). (Please note that
evaluation plans that deal only with the
first level of outcomes [satisfaction] will
be deemed less competitive under the
present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. All data collected,
including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a
minimum of three years and provided to
the Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for
overall program management, staffing,
and coordination with Branch for the
Study of the United States. The Branch
considers these to be essential elements
of your program; please be sure to give
sufficient attention to them in your
proposal. Please refer to the Technical
Eligibility Requirements and the POGI
in the Solicitation Package for specific
guidelines.
IV.3e. Please take the following
information into consideration when
preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a
comprehensive budget for the entire
program. Awards may not exceed
$280,000 in total and $14,000 per
participant. There must be a summary
budget as well as breakdowns reflecting
both administrative and program
budgets. Applicants may provide
separate sub-budgets for each program
component, phase, location, or activity
to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the
program include the following:
(1) Program staff salary and benefits;
(2) Participant housing and meals;
(3) Participant travel and per diem;
(4) Textbooks, educational materials
and admissions fees;
(5) Honoraria for guest speakers.
Please refer to the Solicitation
Package for complete budget guidelines
and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: February
9, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/USS–
07–FAX.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one
of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally
recognized overnight delivery service
(i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS,
Airborne Express, or U.S. Postal Service
Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://
www.grants.gov.
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
Along with the Project Title, all
applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF–
424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI)
of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed
Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above
deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place,
centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed
via the Internet and delivery people
who are identifiable by commonly
recognized uniforms and delivery
vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before
the above deadline but received at ECA
more than seven days after the deadline
will be ineligible for further
consideration under this competition.
Proposals shipped after the established
deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition.
ECA will not notify you upon receipt of
application. It is each applicant’s
responsibility to ensure that each
package is marked with a legible
tracking number and to monitor/confirm
delivery to ECA via the Internet.
Delivery of proposal packages may not
be made via local courier service or in
person for this competition. Faxed
documents will not be accepted at any
time. Only proposals submitted as
stated above will be considered.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Important note: When preparing your
submission please make sure to include one
extra copy of the completed SF–424 form and
place it in an envelope addressed to ‘‘ECA/
EX/PM’’.
The original and 10 copies of the
application should be sent to: U.S.
Department of State, SA–44, Bureau of
Educational and Cultural Affairs, Ref.:
ECA/xx–00–xx (each Program Office
assigns a unique number), Program
Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534,
301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC
20547.
(Include following language re: disk
submission only if proposals will be
forwarded to embassies. If post input is
not necessary, delete language.)
Applicants submitting hard-copy
applications must also submit the
‘‘Executive Summary’’ and ‘‘Proposal
Narrative’’ sections of the proposal in
text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk.
The Bureau will provide these files
electronically to the appropriate Public
Affairs Section(s) at the U.S.
embassy(ies) for its (their) review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic
Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals
electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
solicitation packages are available at
Grants.gov in the ‘‘Find’’ portion of the
system. Please follow the instructions
available in the ‘Get Started’ portion of
the site (https://www.grants.gov/
GetStarted). Several of the steps in the
Grants.gov registration process could
take several weeks. Therefore,
applicants should check with
appropriate staff within their
organizations immediately after
reviewing this RFGP to confirm or
determine their registration status with
Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it
can take to upload an application will
vary depending on a variety of factors
including the size of the application and
the speed of your internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that
you not wait until the application
deadline to begin the submission
process through Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding
Grants.gov registration and submission
to: Grants.gov Customer Support.
Contact Center Phone: 800–518–4726.
Business Hours: Monday–Friday, 7
a.m.–9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12
a.m.), Washington, DC time of the
closing date to ensure that their entire
application has been uploaded to the
Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions
to the above deadline. Applications
uploaded to the site after midnight of
the application deadline date will be
automatically rejected by the grants.gov
system, and will be technically
ineligible.
Applicants will receive a
confirmation e-mail from grants.gov
upon the successful submission of an
application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all
applicants submitting proposals via the
Grants.gov web portal to ensure that
proposals have been received by
Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA
bears no responsibility for data errors
resulting from transmission or
conversion processes.
Optional—IV.3f.3 You may also state
here any limitations on the number of
applications that an applicant may
submit and make it clear whether the
limitation is on the submitting
organization, individual program
director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of
Applications: Executive Order 12372
does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals
for technical eligibility. Proposals will
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71021
be deemed ineligible if they do not fully
adhere to the guidelines stated herein
and in the Solicitation Package. All
eligible proposals will be reviewed by
the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where
appropriate. Eligible proposals will be
subject to compliance with Federal and
Bureau regulations and guidelines and
forwarded to Bureau grant panels for
advisory review. Proposals may also be
reviewed by the Office of the Legal
Adviser or by other Department
elements. Final funding decisions are at
the discretion of the Department of
State’s Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final
technical authority for assistance
awards cooperative agreements resides
with the Bureau’s Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will
be competitively reviewed according to
the criteria stated below. These criteria
are not rank ordered and all carry equal
weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of Program Idea/Plan:
Proposals should exhibit originality,
substance, precision, and relevance to
the Bureau’s mission. Detailed agenda
and relevant work plan should
demonstrate substantive undertakings
and logistical capacity.
2. Ability to Achieve Overall Program
Objectives: Objectives should be
reasonable, feasible, and flexible.
Proposals should clearly demonstrate
how the institution will meet the
program’s objectives and plan.
3. Support for Diversity: Proposals
should demonstrate substantive support
of the Bureau’s policy on diversity.
Achievable and relevant features should
be cited in both program administration
(program venue, study tour venue, and
program evaluation) and program
content (orientation and wrap-up
sessions, site visits, program meetings
and resource materials).
4. Evaluation and Follow-Up:
Proposals should include a plan to
evaluate the Program’s success, both as
the activities unfold and at the end of
the program. A draft survey
questionnaire or other technique plus
description of a methodology to use to
link outcomes to original program
objectives is strongly recommended.
Proposals should also discuss
provisions made for follow-up with
returned grantees as a means of
establishing longer-term individual and
institutional linkages.
5. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing:
The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including
salaries and honoraria, should be kept
as low as possible. All other items
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
71022
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
should be necessary and appropriate.
Proposals should maximize cost-sharing
through other private sector support as
well as institutional direct funding
contributions.
6. Institutional Track Record/Ability:
Proposals should demonstrate an
institutional record of successful
exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full
compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as
determined by Bureau Grants Staff. The
Bureau will consider the past
performance of prior recipients and the
demonstrated potential of new
applicants. Proposed personnel and
institutional resources should be fully
qualified to achieve the Program’s goals.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards
cannot be made until funds have been
appropriated by Congress, allocated and
committed through internal Bureau
procedures. Successful applicants will
receive an Assistance Award Document
(AAD) from the Bureau’s Grants Office.
The AAD and the original grant
proposal with subsequent modifications
(if applicable) shall be the only binding
authorizing document between the
recipient and the U.S. Government. The
AAD will be signed by an authorized
Grants Officer, and mailed to the
recipient’s responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive
notification of the results of the
application review from the ECA
program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National
Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of
ECA agreements include the following:
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–122, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Nonprofit Organizations.’’
Office of Management and Budget
Circular A–21, ‘‘Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions.’’
OMB Circular A–87, ‘‘Cost Principles
for State, Local and Indian
Governments’’.
OMB Circular No. A–110 (Revised),
Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Agreements with
Institutions of Higher Education,
Hospitals, and other Nonprofit
Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A–102, Uniform
Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local
Governments.
OMB Circular No. A–133, Audits of
States, Local Government, and Nonprofit Organizations
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
Please reference the following
websites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants.
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/
grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You
must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one (1) copy of the final
program and financial report no more
than 90 days after the expiration of the
award.
Grantees will be required to provide
reports analyzing their evaluation
findings to the Bureau in their regular
program reports. Please refer to
Application and Submission
Instructions (IV.3d.3) above for Program
Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey
responses and contact information, must
be maintained for a minimum of three
years and provided to the Bureau upon
request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA
Grants Officer and ECA Program Officer
listed in the final assistance award
document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this
announcement, contact: Branch for the
Study of the United States, ECA/A/E/
USS, Room 314, U.S. Department of
State, SA–44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547; tel. (202) 453–
8540; fax (202) 453–8533. For specific
questions on the Fusion Arts Exchange
program, contact Adam Van Loon at
VanLoonAE@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau
concerning this RFGP should reference
the title ‘‘Fusions Arts Exchange’’ and
number ECA/A/E/USS–07–FAX.
Please read the complete Federal
Register announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once
the RFGP deadline has passed, Bureau
staff may not discuss this competition
with applicants until the proposal
review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published
in this RFGP are binding and may not
be modified by any Bureau
representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts
published language will not be binding.
Issuance of the RFGP does not
constitute an award commitment on the
part of the Government. The Bureau
reserves the right to reduce, revise, or
increase proposal budgets in accordance
with the needs of the program and the
availability of funds. Awards made will
be subject to periodic reporting and
evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: November 28, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and
Cultural Affairs Department of State.
[FR Doc. E6–20785 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5623]
Notice of Meeting of the Cultural
Property Advisory Committee
There will be a meeting of the
Cultural Property Advisory Committee
on Thursday, January 25, 2007, from
approximately 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., and on
Friday, January 26, from approximately
9 a.m. to 5 p.m., at the Department of
State, Annex 44, Room 840, 301 4th St.,
SW., Washington, DC. During its
meeting the Committee will review a
proposal to extend the Memorandum of
Understanding between the Government
of the United States of America and the
Government of the Republic of Peru
Concerning the Imposition of Import
Restrictions on Archaeological Material
from the Pre-Hispanic Cultures and
Certain Ethnological Material from the
Colonial Period of Peru; and a proposal
to extend the Memorandum of
Understanding Between the
Government of the United States of
America and the Government of the
Republic of Cyprus Concerning the
Imposition of Import Restrictions on
Pre-Classical and Classical
Archaeological Objects and Byzantine
Period Ecclesiastical and Ritual
Ethnological Material. The concerned
Governments have each notified the
Government of the United States of
America of their interest in extending
the respective MOUs.
The Committee’s responsibilities are
carried out in accordance with
provisions of the Convention on
Cultural Property Implementation Act
(19 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.). The text of the
Act and subject Memoranda of
Understanding, as well as related
information may be found at https://
exchanges.state.gov/culprop. Portions of
the meeting on January 25 and 26 will
be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552b(c)(9)(B) and 19 U.S.C. 2605(h).
However, on January 25, the Committee
will hold an open session from
approximately 9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m., to
receive oral public comment on the
proposals to extend. Persons wishing to
attend this open session should notify
the Cultural Heritage Center of the
Department of State at (202) 453–8800
no later than Thursday, January 11,
2007, 3 p.m. (EST) to arrange for
admission. Seating is limited.
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71016-71022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20785]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5634]
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Request for
Grant Proposals:
Fusion Arts Exchange programs on: Music Composition and
Performance; Digital Media and Computer-Assisted Design; Screenwriting
and Film Production; Sports Management
Announcement Type: New Cooperative Agreement.
Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/A/E/USS-07-FAX.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 00.000.
Key Dates: Application Deadline: February 9, 2007.
Executive Summary: The Branch for the Study of the United States,
Office of Academic Exchange Programs, Bureau of Educational and
Cultural Affairs, invites proposal submissions for the design and
implementation of four Fusion Arts Exchange programs. The programs will
take place over the course of 37 days beginning the second week of July
2007, focused on the themes of Music Composition and Performance,
Digital Media and Computer-Assisted Design, Screenwriting and Film
Production, and Sports Management, respectively. These programs should
provide a multinational group of outstanding undergraduate students a
deeper understanding of U.S. society, culture, values and institutions,
and should develop their knowledge of and abilities in the above-
mentioned professional fields. Each program will host a total of 15
international participants from five Bureau-designated countries, as
well as three to five American undergraduate students who will
participate alongside their international peers. Prospective applicants
may only apply to host one of the four programs listed under this
competition; host institutions may not implement more than one Fusion
Arts Exchange program concurrently.
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Authority: Overall grant making authority for this program is
contained in the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961,
Public Law 87-256, as amended, also known as the Fulbright-Hays Act.
The purpose of the Act is ``to enable the Government of the United
States to increase mutual understanding between the people of the
United States and the people of other countries * * *; to strengthen
the ties which unite us with other nations by demonstrating the
educational and cultural interests, developments, and achievements of
the people of the United States and other nations * * * and thus to
assist in the development of friendly, sympathetic and peaceful
relations between the United States and the other countries of the
world.'' The funding authority for the program above is provided
through legislation.
Purpose: The Fusion Arts Exchange consists of four multinational
exchange programs, whose purpose is to provide outstanding
undergraduate students an intensive, collaborative course on the latest
developments in their respective fields (music composition and
performance; digital media and computer-assisted design; screenwriting
and film production; and sports management), and in the history and
culture of the U.S. as illuminated through the lens of their fields.
Participants will also learn about careers and economic development
opportunities for their communities related to their field, and have
the chance to develop on-going collaborations with their fellow
participants.
The Bureau is seeking detailed proposals for four different Fusion
Arts Exchange programs from U.S. colleges, universities, consortia of
colleges and universities, and other not-for-profit academic
organizations that have an established reputation in a field or
discipline related to the specific program themes.
Overview: Each program should be 37 days in length, and should
include an academic residency component and an educational study tour
component.
The academic residency component should run for no less than 25
days and occur in and around the host institution's facilities. It
should include
[[Page 71017]]
professional seminars, workshops, roundtable discussions, lectures and
local site visits. It should also devote time to allow Fusion Arts
Exchange participants to shadow local professionals in their field.
The educational study tour should run for no less than nine days
and should directly complement the academic residency component. It
should consist of travel to sites of significance to the professional
fields of Fusion Arts Exchange participants, and offer participants an
immersive, firsthand experience of professional issues central to their
specialization. It should include visits to another geographic region
of the country, and access to leading organizations and individuals in
the program's field that are not locally available. It should also
provide for two to three days in Washington, DC, at the conclusion of
the program. If appropriate, the educational study tour component may
be interspersed with the residency portion of the program.
Upon completion of the program, the host institution will also be
expected to provide participants with guidance and resources for
further investigation and research on the topics and issues examined
during the program after they return home.
The Fusion Arts Exchange Program on Music Composition and
Performance should provide a multinational group of 18-20 experienced
and highly-motivated undergraduates with an intensive, collaborative
course on music composition and performance. The core of the program
should consist of opportunities for individual and collaborative music
composition, individual musical coaching, instrument-specific
instruction, group lessons, and individual and group performance
opportunities. Participants should have access to the highest quality
music study and performance facilities at the host institution, and the
latest developments in music recording and production should be
addressed. A key component of the program should be an introductory
course exploring American history, values and culture through the lens
of American music, which should be integrated into the curriculum for
its entirety and provide a framework for the exchange experience.
Participants should learn from leading music academics and
professionals about careers and current and potential economic
development opportunities related to music in the participants' home
countries. They should be given ample opportunity to develop on-going
collaborations with their fellow participants. Bureau-designated
participating countries for this program may include: Brazil, India,
Ireland, Mali, South Africa, and the United States. One award of up to
$280,000 (not to exceed $14,000 per participant, including American
participants) will support this program. This award will not include
funds for participant international travel to and from the United
States, which will be the separate responsibility of the Department.
The Fusion Arts Exchange Program on Digital Media and Computer-
Assisted Design should provide a multinational group of 18-20
experienced and highly-motivated undergraduates with an intensive,
collaborative course on digital media and computer-assisted design. The
program should cover the major topics and latest developments in
interactive digital media, including animation; Web design; print
layout and production; multimedia-print interfacing; digital
photography production; game development; digital media research; and
new forms of computer-related expression. The program should be
designed to provide immersive, hands-on training. Participants should
have access to the highest quality digital media facilities at the host
institution, and the latest developments in digital media should be
thoroughly addressed. The program should also offer opportunities to
learn from leading digital media academics and professionals about
careers and current and potential economic development opportunities
related to digital media in the participants' home countries. A key
component of the program should be an introductory course exploring
American history, values and culture through American historical and
contemporary visual art and communications, including fine art, visual
advertising, Web-based media, and political cartoons or other art
advocating a social movement or cause, which should be integrated into
the curriculum for its entirety and provide a framework for the
exchange experience. Participants should be given ample opportunity to
develop on-going collaborations with their fellow participants. Bureau-
designated participating countries for this program may include:
Argentina, Japan, Jordan, South Korea, and the United States. One award
of up to $280,000 (not to exceed $14,000 per participant, including
American participants) will support this program. This award will not
include funds for participant international travel to and from the
United States, which will be the separate responsibility of the
Department.
The Fusion Arts Exchange Program on Screenwriting and Film
Production should provide a multinational group of 18-20 experienced
and highly-motivated undergraduates with an intensive, collaborative
course on screenwriting within the context of current film production
techniques and standards. The core of the program should consist of an
immersive, hands-on, production-oriented screenwriting workshop.
Participants should have access to the highest quality film production
facilities at the host institution, and the latest developments in film
production as they relate to screenwriting should be thoroughly
addressed. The program should also cover the major topics in film and
television, including production, direction, cinematography, sound
design, and editing, as they relate to screenwriting. Participants
should have ample opportunity to learn from academics and working
professionals about careers and current and potential economic
development opportunities related to the film and television industries
in the participants' home countries. A key component of the program
should be an introductory course exploring American history, values and
culture as seen through American film, which should be integrated into
the curriculum for its entirety and provide a framework for the
exchange experience. Participants should be given ample opportunity to
develop on-going collaborations with their fellow participants. Bureau-
designated participating countries for this program may include
countries in Europe, Asia, Africa and the United States. One award of
up to $280,000 (not to exceed $14,000 per participant, including
American participants) will support this program. This award will not
include funds for participant international travel to and from the
United States, which will be the separate responsibility of the
Department.
The Fusion Arts Exchange Program on Sports Management should
provide a multinational group of 18-20 experienced and highly-motivated
undergraduates with an intensive, collaborative course on the business
of sports management. The program should cover the major topics in
sports management, including marketing sports properties; sponsorship
alliances; athlete, owner and fan relations; contractual negotiations;
media licensing and other forms of licensing; women's sports
development; and the economic and legal aspects of sports
[[Page 71018]]
management. Participants should have ample opportunity to learn from
academics and working professionals about careers and current and
potential economic development opportunities related to the sports
management profession in the participants' home countries. A key
component of the program should be an introductory course exploring
American history, values and culture through the lens of American
sports history and culture, including films and literature about
sports, which should be integrated into the curriculum for its entirety
and provide a framework for the exchange experience. Participants
should be given ample opportunity to develop on-going collaborations
with their fellow participants. Bureau-designated participating
countries for this program may include: Indonesia, Nigeria, Russia,
Turkey, Venezuela, and the United States. One award of up to $280,000
(not to exceed $14,000 per participant, including American
participants) will support this program. This award will not include
funds for participant international travel to and from the United
States, which will be the separate responsibility of the Department.
Program Design: Each Fusion Arts Exchange program should be
designed as an intensive, interactive, academically rigorous seminar
for an experienced group of undergraduate students from abroad and from
the U.S. Each program should be organized through an integrated series
of individual and group training workshops, lectures, readings, seminar
discussions, public presentation opportunities, and regional travel and
site visits. Applicants are encouraged to design creative, thematically
coherent programs that draw upon the particular strengths, faculty and
resources of their institutions as well as upon the nationally
recognized expertise of scholars, professionals, artists and other
experts throughout the United States. Academic facilities devoted to
the program must be of the highest quality and should feature state-of-
the-art technology. Applicants should clearly outline the facilities
they propose to devote to the program and justify that they meet the
above criteria.
Program Administration: Each Fusion Arts Exchange program should
designate an academic director who will be present throughout the
program to ensure the continuity, coherence and integration of all
aspects of the academic program, including the educational study tour.
In addition to the academic director, an administrative director or
coordinator should be assigned to oversee all participant support
services, including close oversight of the program participants, and
budgetary, logistical, and other administrative arrangements. The
administrative director or coordinator should be the Bureau's primary
point of contact.
International Participants: Fifteen international participants per
program will be nominated by U.S. Embassies and Fulbright Commissions
from the five above-mentioned Bureau-designated countries for each
program. Final selection will be made by the Bureau's Branch for the
Study of the United States. Every effort will be made to select a
balanced mix of male and female participants. International
participants will be diverse in terms of academic and professional
background. All international participants will have a good knowledge
of English. Participants may or may not come from educational
institutions where the study of their specialization is relatively
well-developed. Preference will be given in the selection process to
participants with no or limited experience with the United States,
although some may have visited the United States previously. In all
cases, participants will be accomplished undergraduate students, who
will be prepared to participate in an intellectually, professionally
and/or artistically rigorous academic seminar that offers a collegial
atmosphere conducive to collaborative work and exchange of ideas.
American Participants: Three to five American undergraduate
students, outstanding in their respective fields, should be
competitively selected by each host institution as participants in its
program. No more than one American participant per program may be a
current or past student of that program's host institution. These
American participants will participate in all aspects of the Fusion
Arts Exchange program, living and working collaboratively with their
international peers. Prospective host institutions will be evaluated on
their ability to recruit appropriate American participants. American
participants should be both exemplary cultural representatives of the
United States and experienced in the discipline of the Fusion Arts
Exchange for which they have been selected. In all cases, participants
should be accomplished undergraduate students, who will be prepared to
participate in an intellectually, professionally and/or artistically
rigorous academic seminar that offers a collegial atmosphere conducive
to collaborative work and exchange of ideas. Every effort should be
made to select a balanced mix of male and female participants.
Program Dates: Proposed programs should be a maximum of 37 days in
length (including participant arrival and departure days) and should
begin during the second week of July 2007.
Program Guidelines: It is essential that proposals provide a
detailed and comprehensive narrative describing the objectives of the
program; the title, scope and content of each session; planned site
visits; and how each session relates to the overall program
professional focus and themes. A syllabus must be included that
indicates the subject matter for each lecture, panel discussion, group
presentation or other activity. The syllabus should also confirm or
provisionally identify proposed speakers, trainers, and session
leaders, and clearly show how assigned readings will advance the goals
of each session. A calendar of all program activities must be included
in the proposal, as well as a description of plans for public and media
outreach in connection with the program. Overall, proposals will be
reviewed on the basis of their responsiveness to RFGP criteria,
coherence, clarity, and attention to detail.
Please note: In a cooperative agreement, the Branch for the
Study of the United States is substantially involved in program
activities above and beyond routine grant monitoring. The Branch
will assume the following responsibilities for each Fusion Arts
Exchange program: participate in the selection of international
participants; oversee the program through regular contact with the
administrator(s) and one or more site visits; debrief participants
in Washington, DC at the conclusion of the program; and engage in
follow-on communication with the participants after they return to
their home countries. The Branch may request that the host
institution make modifications to the academic residency and/or
educational travel components of the program. The recipient will be
required to obtain approval of significant program changes in
advance of their implementation.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement. ECA's level of involvement in
this program is listed under number I above.
Fiscal Year Funds: FY-2007.
Approximate Total Funding: $1,120,000.
Approximate Number of Awards: 4.
Approximate Average Award: $280,000.
Ceiling of Award Range: $280,000.
Anticipated Award Date: Pending availability of funds, March 1,
2007.
Anticipated Project Completion Date: August 18, 2007.
[[Page 71019]]
Additional Information: Pending successful implementation of this
program and the availability of funds in subsequent fiscal years, it is
ECA's intent to renew this grant for two additional fiscal years,
before openly competing it again.
III. Eligibility Information
III.1. Eligible applicants: Applications may be submitted by public
and private non-profit organizations meeting the provisions described
in Internal Revenue Code section 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
III.2. Cost Sharing or Matching Funds: There is no minimum or
maximum percentage required for this competition. However, the Bureau
encourages applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and
funding in support of its programs.
When cost sharing is offered, it is understood and agreed that the
applicant must provide the amount of cost sharing as stipulated in its
proposal and later included in an approved grant agreement. Cost
sharing may be in the form of allowable direct or indirect costs. For
accountability, you must maintain written records to support all costs
which are claimed as your contribution, as well as costs to be paid by
the Federal government. Such records are subject to audit. The basis
for determining the value of cash and in-kind contributions must be in
accordance with OMB Circular A-110, (Revised), Subpart C.23--Cost
Sharing and Matching. In the event you do not provide the minimum
amount of cost sharing as stipulated in the approved budget, ECA's
contribution will be reduced in like proportion.
III.3. Other Eligibility Requirements:
a. Grants awarded to eligible organizations with less than four
years of experience in conducting international exchange programs will
be limited to $60,000. ECA anticipates awarding four grants, in amount
over $60,0000 to support program and administrative costs required to
implement this exchange program. Therefore, organizations with less
than four years experience in conducting international exchanges are
ineligible to apply under this competition. The Bureau encourages
applicants to provide maximum levels of cost sharing and funding in
support of its programs.
b. Technical Eligibility: It is the Bureau's intent to award four
separate cooperative agreements to four different institutions under
this competition. Therefore prospective applicants may only submit one
proposal under this competition. All applicants must comply with this
requirement. Should an applicant submit multiple proposals under this
competition, all proposals will be declared technically ineligible and
given no further consideration in the review process.
IV. Application and Submission Information
Note: Please read the complete announcement before sending
inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with
applicants until the proposal review process has been completed.
IV.1 Contact Information to Request an Application Package: Please
contact the Branch for the Study of the United States, ECA/A/E/USS,
Room 314, U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547; tel. (202) 453-8540; fax (202) 453-8533 to
request a Solicitation Package. Please refer to the Funding Opportunity
Number ECA/A/E/USS-07-FAX located at the top of this announcement when
making your request.
Alternatively, an electronic application package may be obtained
from grants.gov. Please see section IV.3f. for further information.
The Solicitation Package contains the Proposal Submission
Instruction (PSI) document which consists of required application
forms, and standard guidelines for proposal preparation. It also
contains the Project Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI)
document, which provides specific information, award criteria and
budget instructions tailored to this competition.
For specific questions on the Fusion Arts Exchange programs, please
specify Adam Van Loon, VanLoonAE@state.gov and refer to the Funding
Opportunity Number ECA/A/E/USS-07-FAX located at the top of this
announcement on all other inquiries and correspondence.
IV.2. To Download a Solicitation Package Via Internet: The entire
Solicitation Package may be downloaded from the Bureau's Web site at
https://exchanges.state.gov/education/rfgps/menu.htm, or from the
Grants.gov website at https://www.grants.gov.
Please read all information before downloading.
IV.3. Content and Form of Submission: Applicants must follow all
instructions in the Solicitation Package. The application should be
submitted per the instructions under IV.3f. ``Application Deadline and
Methods of Submission'' section below.
IV.3a. You are required to have a Dun and Bradstreet Data Universal
Numbering System (DUNS) number to apply for a grant or cooperative
agreement from the U.S. Government. This number is a nine-digit
identification number, which uniquely identifies business entities.
Obtaining a DUNS number is easy and there is no charge. To obtain a
DUNS number, access https://www.dunandbradstreet.com or call 1-866-705-
5711. Please ensure that your DUNS number is included in the
appropriate box of the SF-424 which is part of the formal application
package.
IV.3b. All proposals must contain an executive summary, proposal
narrative and budget.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package. It contains the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) document and the Project
Objectives, Goals and Implementation (POGI) document for additional
formatting and technical requirements.
IV.3c. You must have nonprofit status with the IRS at the time of
application. If your organization is a private nonprofit which has not
received a grant or cooperative agreement from ECA in the past three
years, or if your organization received nonprofit status from the IRS
within the past four years, you must submit the necessary documentation
to verify nonprofit status as directed in the PSI document. Failure to
do so will cause your proposal to be declared technically ineligible.
IV.3d. Please take into consideration the following information
when preparing your proposal narrative:
IV.3d.1 Adherence to All Regulations Governing the J Visa. The
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs is placing renewed emphasis
on the secure and proper administration of Exchange Visitor (J visa)
Programs and adherence by grantees and sponsors to all regulations
governing the J visa. Therefore, proposals should demonstrate the
applicant's capacity to meet all requirements governing the
administration of the Exchange Visitor Programs as set forth in 22 CFR
62, including the oversight of Responsible Officers and Alternate
Responsible Officers, screening and selection of program participants,
provision of pre-arrival information and orientation to participants,
monitoring of participants, proper maintenance and security of forms,
record-keeping, reporting and other requirements.
ECA will be responsible for issuing DS-2019 forms to participants
in this program.
A copy of the complete regulations governing the administration of
Exchange Visitor (J) programs is available at https://
exchanges.state.gov or from: United States Department of State, Office
of Exchange Coordination and Designation, ECA/EC/ECD--SA-44,
[[Page 71020]]
Room 734, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547, Telephone: (202)
203-5029, FAX: (202) 453-8640.
Please refer to Solicitation Package for further information.
IV.3d.2 Diversity, Freedom and Democracy Guidelines. Pursuant to
the Bureau's authorizing legislation, programs must maintain a non-
political character and should be balanced and representative of the
diversity of American political, social, and cultural life.
``Diversity'' should be interpreted in the broadest sense and encompass
differences including, but not limited to ethnicity, race, gender,
religion, geographic location, socio-economic status, and disabilities.
Applicants are strongly encouraged to adhere to the advancement of this
principle both in program administration and in program content. Please
refer to the review criteria under the `Support for Diversity' section
for specific suggestions on incorporating diversity into your proposal.
Public Law 104-319 provides that ``in carrying out programs of
educational and cultural exchange in countries whose people do not
fully enjoy freedom and democracy,'' the Bureau ``shall take
appropriate steps to provide opportunities for participation in such
programs to human rights and democracy leaders of such countries.''
Public Law 106-113 requires that the governments of the countries
described above do not have inappropriate influence in the selection
process. Proposals should reflect advancement of these goals in their
program contents, to the full extent deemed feasible.
IV.3d.3. Program Monitoring and Evaluation. Proposals must include
a plan to monitor and evaluate the project's success, both as the
activities unfold and at the end of the program. The Bureau recommends
that your proposal include a draft survey questionnaire or other
technique plus a description of a methodology to use to link outcomes
to original project objectives. The Bureau expects that the grantee
will track participants or partners and be able to respond to key
evaluation questions, including satisfaction with the program, learning
as a result of the program, changes in behavior as a result of the
program, and effects of the program on institutions (institutions in
which participants work or partner institutions). The evaluation plan
should include indicators that measure gains in mutual understanding as
well as substantive knowledge.
Successful monitoring and evaluation depend heavily on setting
clear goals and outcomes at the outset of a program. Your evaluation
plan should include a description of your project's objectives, your
anticipated project outcomes, and how and when you intend to measure
these outcomes (performance indicators). The more that outcomes are
``smart'' (specific, measurable, attainable, results-oriented, and
placed in a reasonable time frame), the easier it will be to conduct
the evaluation. You should also show how your project objectives link
to the goals of the program described in this RFGP.
Your monitoring and evaluation plan should clearly distinguish
between program outputs and outcomes. Outputs are products and services
delivered, often stated as an amount. Output information is important
to show the scope or size of project activities, but it cannot
substitute for information about progress towards outcomes or the
results achieved. Examples of outputs include the number of people
trained or the number of seminars conducted. Outcomes, in contrast,
represent specific results a project is intended to achieve and is
usually measured as an extent of change. Findings on outputs and
outcomes should both be reported, but the focus should be on outcomes.
We encourage you to assess the following four levels of outcomes,
as they relate to the program goals set out in the RFGP (listed here in
increasing order of importance):
1. Participant satisfaction with the program and exchange
experience.
2. Participant learning, such as increased knowledge, aptitude,
skills, and changed understanding and attitude. Learning includes both
substantive (subject-specific) learning and mutual understanding.
3. Participant behavior, concrete actions to apply knowledge in
work or community; greater participation and responsibility in civic
organizations; interpretation and explanation of experiences and new
knowledge gained; continued contacts between participants, community
members, and others.
4. Institutional changes, such as increased collaboration and
partnerships, policy reforms, new programming, and organizational
improvements.
Please note: Consideration should be given to the appropriate
timing of data collection for each level of outcome. For example,
satisfaction is usually captured as a short-term outcome, whereas
behavior and institutional changes are normally considered longer-
term outcomes.
Overall, the quality of your monitoring and evaluation plan will be
judged on how well it (1) Specifies intended outcomes; (2) gives clear
descriptions of how each outcome will be measured; (3) identifies when
particular outcomes will be measured; and (4) provides a clear
description of the data collection strategies for each outcome (i.e.,
surveys, interviews, or focus groups). (Please note that evaluation
plans that deal only with the first level of outcomes [satisfaction]
will be deemed less competitive under the present evaluation criteria.)
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports. All
data collected, including survey responses and contact information,
must be maintained for a minimum of three years and provided to the
Bureau upon request.
IV.3d.4. Describe your plans for overall program management,
staffing, and coordination with Branch for the Study of the United
States. The Branch considers these to be essential elements of your
program; please be sure to give sufficient attention to them in your
proposal. Please refer to the Technical Eligibility Requirements and
the POGI in the Solicitation Package for specific guidelines.
IV.3e. Please take the following information into consideration
when preparing your budget:
IV.3e.1. Applicants must submit a comprehensive budget for the
entire program. Awards may not exceed $280,000 in total and $14,000 per
participant. There must be a summary budget as well as breakdowns
reflecting both administrative and program budgets. Applicants may
provide separate sub-budgets for each program component, phase,
location, or activity to provide clarification.
IV.3e.2. Allowable costs for the program include the following:
(1) Program staff salary and benefits;
(2) Participant housing and meals;
(3) Participant travel and per diem;
(4) Textbooks, educational materials and admissions fees;
(5) Honoraria for guest speakers.
Please refer to the Solicitation Package for complete budget
guidelines and formatting instructions.
IV.3f. Application Deadline and Methods of Submission:
Application Deadline Date: February 9, 2007.
Reference Number: ECA/A/E/USS-07-FAX.
Methods of Submission:
Applications may be submitted in one of two ways:
1. In hard-copy, via a nationally recognized overnight delivery
service (i.e., DHL, Federal Express, UPS, Airborne Express, or U.S.
Postal Service Express Overnight Mail, etc.), or
2. Electronically through https://www.grants.gov.
[[Page 71021]]
Along with the Project Title, all applicants must enter the above
Reference Number in Box 11 on the SF-424 contained in the mandatory
Proposal Submission Instructions (PSI) of the solicitation document.
IV.3f.1. Submitting Printed Applications. Applications must be
shipped no later than the above deadline. Delivery services used by
applicants must have in-place, centralized shipping identification and
tracking systems that may be accessed via the Internet and delivery
people who are identifiable by commonly recognized uniforms and
delivery vehicles. Proposals shipped on or before the above deadline
but received at ECA more than seven days after the deadline will be
ineligible for further consideration under this competition. Proposals
shipped after the established deadlines are ineligible for
consideration under this competition. ECA will not notify you upon
receipt of application. It is each applicant's responsibility to ensure
that each package is marked with a legible tracking number and to
monitor/confirm delivery to ECA via the Internet. Delivery of proposal
packages may not be made via local courier service or in person for
this competition. Faxed documents will not be accepted at any time.
Only proposals submitted as stated above will be considered.
Important note: When preparing your submission please make sure
to include one extra copy of the completed SF-424 form and place it
in an envelope addressed to ``ECA/EX/PM''.
The original and 10 copies of the application should be sent to:
U.S. Department of State, SA-44, Bureau of Educational and Cultural
Affairs, Ref.: ECA/xx-00-xx (each Program Office assigns a unique
number), Program Management, ECA/EX/PM, Room 534, 301 4th Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20547.
(Include following language re: disk submission only if proposals
will be forwarded to embassies. If post input is not necessary, delete
language.)
Applicants submitting hard-copy applications must also submit the
``Executive Summary'' and ``Proposal Narrative'' sections of the
proposal in text (.txt) format on a PC-formatted disk. The Bureau will
provide these files electronically to the appropriate Public Affairs
Section(s) at the U.S. embassy(ies) for its (their) review.
IV.3f.2. Submitting Electronic Applications. Applicants have the
option of submitting proposals electronically through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Complete solicitation packages are available
at Grants.gov in the ``Find'' portion of the system. Please follow the
instructions available in the `Get Started' portion of the site (http:/
/www.grants.gov/GetStarted). Several of the steps in the Grants.gov
registration process could take several weeks. Therefore, applicants
should check with appropriate staff within their organizations
immediately after reviewing this RFGP to confirm or determine their
registration status with Grants.gov.
Once registered, the amount of time it can take to upload an
application will vary depending on a variety of factors including the
size of the application and the speed of your internet connection.
Therefore, we strongly recommend that you not wait until the
application deadline to begin the submission process through
Grants.gov.
Direct all questions regarding Grants.gov registration and
submission to: Grants.gov Customer Support. Contact Center Phone: 800-
518-4726. Business Hours: Monday-Friday, 7 a.m.-9 p.m. Eastern Time.
E-mail: support@grants.gov.
Applicants have until midnight (12 a.m.), Washington, DC time of
the closing date to ensure that their entire application has been
uploaded to the Grants.gov site. There are no exceptions to the above
deadline. Applications uploaded to the site after midnight of the
application deadline date will be automatically rejected by the
grants.gov system, and will be technically ineligible.
Applicants will receive a confirmation e-mail from grants.gov upon
the successful submission of an application. ECA will not notify you
upon receipt of electronic applications.
It is the responsibility of all applicants submitting proposals via
the Grants.gov web portal to ensure that proposals have been received
by Grants.gov in their entirety, and ECA bears no responsibility for
data errors resulting from transmission or conversion processes.
Optional--IV.3f.3 You may also state here any limitations on the
number of applications that an applicant may submit and make it clear
whether the limitation is on the submitting organization, individual
program director or both.
IV.3g. Intergovernmental Review of Applications: Executive Order
12372 does not apply to this program.
V. Application Review Information
V.1. Review Process
The Bureau will review all proposals for technical eligibility.
Proposals will be deemed ineligible if they do not fully adhere to the
guidelines stated herein and in the Solicitation Package. All eligible
proposals will be reviewed by the program office, as well as the Public
Diplomacy section overseas, where appropriate. Eligible proposals will
be subject to compliance with Federal and Bureau regulations and
guidelines and forwarded to Bureau grant panels for advisory review.
Proposals may also be reviewed by the Office of the Legal Adviser or by
other Department elements. Final funding decisions are at the
discretion of the Department of State's Assistant Secretary for
Educational and Cultural Affairs. Final technical authority for
assistance awards cooperative agreements resides with the Bureau's
Grants Officer.
Review Criteria
Technically eligible applications will be competitively reviewed
according to the criteria stated below. These criteria are not rank
ordered and all carry equal weight in the proposal evaluation:
1. Quality of Program Idea/Plan: Proposals should exhibit
originality, substance, precision, and relevance to the Bureau's
mission. Detailed agenda and relevant work plan should demonstrate
substantive undertakings and logistical capacity.
2. Ability to Achieve Overall Program Objectives: Objectives should
be reasonable, feasible, and flexible. Proposals should clearly
demonstrate how the institution will meet the program's objectives and
plan.
3. Support for Diversity: Proposals should demonstrate substantive
support of the Bureau's policy on diversity. Achievable and relevant
features should be cited in both program administration (program venue,
study tour venue, and program evaluation) and program content
(orientation and wrap-up sessions, site visits, program meetings and
resource materials).
4. Evaluation and Follow-Up: Proposals should include a plan to
evaluate the Program's success, both as the activities unfold and at
the end of the program. A draft survey questionnaire or other technique
plus description of a methodology to use to link outcomes to original
program objectives is strongly recommended. Proposals should also
discuss provisions made for follow-up with returned grantees as a means
of establishing longer-term individual and institutional linkages.
5. Cost-effectiveness/Cost-sharing: The overhead and administrative
components of the proposal, including salaries and honoraria, should be
kept as low as possible. All other items
[[Page 71022]]
should be necessary and appropriate. Proposals should maximize cost-
sharing through other private sector support as well as institutional
direct funding contributions.
6. Institutional Track Record/Ability: Proposals should demonstrate
an institutional record of successful exchange programs, including
responsible fiscal management and full compliance with all reporting
requirements for past Bureau grants as determined by Bureau Grants
Staff. The Bureau will consider the past performance of prior
recipients and the demonstrated potential of new applicants. Proposed
personnel and institutional resources should be fully qualified to
achieve the Program's goals.
VI. Award Administration Information
VI.1a. Award Notices: Final awards cannot be made until funds have
been appropriated by Congress, allocated and committed through internal
Bureau procedures. Successful applicants will receive an Assistance
Award Document (AAD) from the Bureau's Grants Office. The AAD and the
original grant proposal with subsequent modifications (if applicable)
shall be the only binding authorizing document between the recipient
and the U.S. Government. The AAD will be signed by an authorized Grants
Officer, and mailed to the recipient's responsible officer identified
in the application.
Unsuccessful applicants will receive notification of the results of
the application review from the ECA program office coordinating this
competition.
VI.2 Administrative and National Policy Requirements: Terms and
Conditions for the Administration of ECA agreements include the
following:
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-122, ``Cost Principles
for Nonprofit Organizations.''
Office of Management and Budget Circular A-21, ``Cost Principles
for Educational Institutions.''
OMB Circular A-87, ``Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian
Governments''.
OMB Circular No. A-110 (Revised), Uniform Administrative
Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, and other Nonprofit Organizations.
OMB Circular No. A-102, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments.
OMB Circular No. A-133, Audits of States, Local Government, and
Non-profit Organizations
Please reference the following websites for additional information:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants. https://exchanges.state.gov/
education/grantsdiv/terms.htm#articleI.
VI.3. Reporting Requirements: You must provide ECA with a hard copy
original plus one (1) copy of the final program and financial report no
more than 90 days after the expiration of the award.
Grantees will be required to provide reports analyzing their
evaluation findings to the Bureau in their regular program reports.
Please refer to Application and Submission Instructions (IV.3d.3) above
for Program Monitoring and Evaluation information.
All data collected, including survey responses and contact
information, must be maintained for a minimum of three years and
provided to the Bureau upon request.
All reports must be sent to the ECA Grants Officer and ECA Program
Officer listed in the final assistance award document.
VII. Agency Contacts
For questions about this announcement, contact: Branch for the
Study of the United States, ECA/A/E/USS, Room 314, U.S. Department of
State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547; tel. (202)
453-8540; fax (202) 453-8533. For specific questions on the Fusion Arts
Exchange program, contact Adam Van Loon at VanLoonAE@state.gov.
All correspondence with the Bureau concerning this RFGP should
reference the title ``Fusions Arts Exchange'' and number ECA/A/E/USS-
07-FAX.
Please read the complete Federal Register announcement before
sending inquiries or submitting proposals. Once the RFGP deadline has
passed, Bureau staff may not discuss this competition with applicants
until the proposal review process has been completed.
VIII. Other Information
Notice
The terms and conditions published in this RFGP are binding and may
not be modified by any Bureau representative. Explanatory information
provided by the Bureau that contradicts published language will not be
binding. Issuance of the RFGP does not constitute an award commitment
on the part of the Government. The Bureau reserves the right to reduce,
revise, or increase proposal budgets in accordance with the needs of
the program and the availability of funds. Awards made will be subject
to periodic reporting and evaluation requirements per section VI.3
above.
Dated: November 28, 2006.
Dina Habib Powell,
Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs Department of
State.
[FR Doc. E6-20785 Filed 12-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P