Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Reporting Requirements and Conservation Measures, 70941-70943 [E6-20770]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
require any new information to be provided
by the applicant or impose any substantive
costs.
Replacement permits are issued by NMFS
to vessel owners to replace lost or mutilated
permits. Vessel owners with a lost or
mutilated permit primarily notify NMFS by
telephone when requesting a replacement
permit. NMFS has never established a formal
process to provide replacement permits, but
the number of requests for replacements over
the past year (approximately 50) make it clear
that such a process is required. NMFS
proposes that vessel owners requiring a
replacement permit submit a completed
application form to NMFS by mail or fax. The
estimated reporting burden to prepare the
single page, application averages 0.42 hours
per vessel, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection
of information NMFS recognizes that the
duration of time between the initial
application and completing a second one to
obtain a replacement permit dictates the
reporting burden and certainly the longer the
time span between the two, the closer the
applicant would come to the 0.42 hour
estimate. NMFS has also estimated that of the
1800 permits issued since April, 2005,
approximately 50 were replaced in 2006
creating an annualized burden of 21 hours.
The permits are currently free and the only
cost (other than time) would be that of
submitting the application (e.g., up to 39
cents postage).
The revised method for renewing permits
will not place any new or additional burdens
on HMS vessel owners. For replacing
permits, HMS vessel owners will need to take
the time to complete a second application
form and mail or fax it to NMFS. NMFS also
does not anticipate a drop in profitability
based on this rule, as it should not have an
affect on a vessel owner’s ability to harvest
HMS. Therefore, the proposed action, if
implemented, will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
A fishing vessel is considered a ‘‘small’’
business by the U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) if its annual receipts
not in excess of $3.5 million. Since all of the
vessels fishing for West Coast HMS have
annual receipts below $3.5 million they
would all be considered small businesses
under the SBA standards. Therefore this rule
will not create disproportionate costs
between small and large vessels/businesses.
Based on the analysis above, the
Department of Commerce has determined
that there will not be a significant economic
impact to a substantial number of these small
entities. Therefore, NMFS did not prepare an
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis.
As a result, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and none has
been prepared.
This proposed rule for permit
renewals references a collection-ofinformation requirement subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
was approved by OMB under control
number 0648–0204. Public reporting
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
burden for preparing a HMS Vessel
Permit Application is estimated to
average 0.42 hours per vessel, including
the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden
estimate, or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSEES) and by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
(202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and
procedure, Permits.
Dated: November 30, 2006.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 660 as follows:
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 660.707, paragraphs (b)(4) and
(b)(5)are revised to read as follows:
§ 660.707
Permits.
(b) * * *
(4) Permits issued under this subpart
will remain valid until the first date of
renewal, and permits may be
subsequently be renewed for 2–year
terms. The first date of renewal will be
the last day of the owner’s birth month
in the second calendar year after the
permit is issued (e.g., if the birth month
is March and the permit is issued on
October 3, 2007, the permit will remain
valid through March 31, 2009).
(5) Replacement permits may be
issued without charge to replace lost or
mutilated permits. Replacement permits
may be obtained by submitting to the
SFD c/o the Regional Administrator a
complete, signed vessel permit
application. An application for a
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70941
replacement permit is not considered a
new application.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–20721 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No 061127309–6309–01; I.D.
110706D]
RIN 0648–AU72
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries;
Reporting Requirements and
Conservation Measures
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes a regulation
to implement new reporting and
conservation measures under the
Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). These
reporting requirements and prohibitive
measures would require coastal pelagic
species (CPS) fishermen/vessel
operators to employ avoidance measures
when southern sea otters are present in
the area they are fishing and to report
any interactions that may occur between
their vessel and/or fishing gear and sea
otters. The purpose of this proposed
rule is to comply with the terms and
conditions of an incidental take
statement from a biological opinion
issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service regarding the implementation of
Amendment 11 to the CPS FMP.
DATES: Comments must be received by
January 8, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this proposed rule, identified by
[insert ID] by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: 0648–AU72.SWR@noaa.gov
Include the I.D. number in the subject
line of the message.
• Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional
Administrator, Southwest Region,
NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802–4213.
• Fax: (562) 980–4047.
• Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
of the collection-of-information
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
70942
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
requirements contained in this proposed
rule may be submitted to the Southwest
Regional Office and by e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to
(202) 395–7285
Copies of Amendment 11 and its
Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory
Impact Review may be obtained from
the Southwest Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua B. Lindsay, Southwest Region,
NMFS, (562) 980–4034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action proposes to implement new
reporting requirements and
conservation measures under the
Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The purpose
of the proposed rule is to comply with
the terms and conditions set forth in the
incidental take statement section of a
biological opinion issued by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS)
regarding the implementation of
Amendment 11 and to provide further
conservation efforts for the threatened
southern sea otter. These reporting
requirements and conservation
measures would require all coastal
pelagic species (CPS) fishermen and
vessel operators to employ avoidance
measures when sea otters are present in
the fishing area and to report any
interactions that may occur between
their vessel and/or fishing gear and the
otters.
In accordance with the regulations
implementing the Endangered Species
Act (ESA), the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) initiated an
ESA section 7 consultation with USFWS
regarding the possible effects of
implementing Amendment 11 to the
CPS FMP. The purpose of the
Amendment was to achieve optimal
utilization of the resource and equitable
allocation of Pacific sardine harvest
opportunity. On June 16, 2006, USFWS
completed a biological opinion on
Amendment 11 and concluded that it
was not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of the southern sea
otter. The final rule to implement
Amendment 11 was then published on
June 29, 2006 (71 FR 36999) and
changed the framework for annual
apportionment of the Pacific sardine
harvest guideline along the U.S. Pacific
coast.
These new measures and regulations
would include:
1. CPS fishing boat operators and
crew would be prohibited from
deploying their nets if a southern sea
otter is observed within the area that
would be encircled by the purse seine.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
2. If a southern sea otter is entangled
in a net, regardless of whether the
animal is injured or killed, such an
occurrence must be reported within 24
hours to the Regional Administrator,
NMFS Southwest Region.
3. While fishing for CPS, vessel
operators must record all observations
of otter interactions (defined as otters
within encircled nets or coming into
contact with nets or vessels, including
but not limited to entanglement) with
their purse seine net(s) or vessel(s).
With the exception of an entaglement,
which will be initially reported as
described in ι2 above, all other
observations must be reported within 20
days to the Regional Administrator.
When contacting NMFS after an
interaction, fishermen would be
required to provide information
regarding the location (latitude and
longitude) of the interaction and a
description of the interaction itself. If
available, location information should
also include: Water depth, distance from
shore, and relation to port or other
landmarks. Descriptive information of
the interaction should include: whether
or not the otters were seen inside or
outside the net, if inside the net, had the
net been completely encircled, did
contact occur with net or vessel, the
number of otters present, duration of
interaction, otter’s behavior during
interaction, and measures taken to avoid
interaction.
Classification
This proposed rule contains a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This requirement has been
submitted to OMB for approval. Public
reporting burden for this otter
interaction requirement is estimated to
average 10 minutes per individual per
response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection
of information.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether this proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
infromation technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
collection of information to NMFS
Southwest Region at the ADDRESSES
above, and e-mail to
DavidlRostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to
(202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
These proposed specifications are
issued under the authority of, and
NMFS has preliminarily determined
that it is in accordance with, the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
FMP, and the regulations implementing
the FMP.
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities as
follows:
A fishing vessel is considered a ‘‘small’’
business by the U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) if its annual receipts
are not in excess of $3.5 million. Since all of
the vessels fishing for CPS have annual
receipts below $3.5 million they would all be
considered small businesses under the SBA
standards. Therefore this rule will not create
disproportionate costs between small and
large vessels/businesses.
Otter interactions as described in this
proposed rule are extremely rare; therefore
the burden to small businesses as a result of
these new regulations is expected to be
minimal. The only expected cost to the
respondents will be the cost associated with
contacting NMFS, which may be made
through mail, phone, fax, or email. NMFS
also does not anticipate a drop in
profitability based on this rule, as the
proposed action should not have a
substantial effect on the methods fishermen
use or the areas in which they fish. The
overlap between the distribution of the
southern sea otter and CPS fishing grounds
is very limited. Where overlap does occur, a
small portion of Monterey Bay, otter
interactions with CPS fishermen have been
very rare. Due to the limited potential for
overlap the fishermen’s ability to harvest CPS
will not be effected.
NMFS has determined that there will not
be a significant economic impact to a
substantial number of these small entities.
Therefore, NMFS did not prepare an Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis.
As a result, a regulatory flexibility
analysis is not required and none has
been prepared.
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and
procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives,
Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 4, 2006.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES AND IN THE
WESTERN PACIFIC
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 660.505, add paragraph (n) to
read as follows:
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) When fishing for CPS, deploy a net
if a southern sea otter is observed within
the area that would be encircled by the
purse seine net.
3. Section 660.520 is added to read as
follows:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Reporting requirements.
(a) Otter interaction. (1) If a southern
sea otter is entangled in a net, regardless
of whether the animal is injured or
killed, the vessel operator must report
this interaction within 24 hours to the
Regional Administrator.
(2) While fishing for CPS, vessel
operators must record all observations
of otter interactions (defined as otters
within encircled nets or coming into
contact with nets or vessels, including
but not limited to entanglement) with
their purse seine net(s) or vessel(s).
With the exception of an entanglement,
which must be initially reported as
described in paragraph (a)(1)of this
section, all other observations must be
reported within 20 days to the Regional
Administrator.
(3) When contacting NMFS after an
interaction, vessel operators must
provide the location (latitude and
longitude) of the interaction and a
description of the interaction itself. If
available, location information should
also include water depth, distance from
shore, and relation to port or other
landmarks. Descriptive information of
the interaction should include: whether
or not the otters were seen inside or
outside the net; if inside the net, had the
net been completely encircled; whether
any otters came in contact with either
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:22 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[I.D. 112006I]
RIN 0648–AU48
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
§ 660.520
[FR Doc. E6–20770 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 660 as follows:
§ 660.505
the net or the vessel; the number of
otters present; duration of interaction;
otter’s behavior during interaction;
measures taken to avoid interaction.
(b) [Reserved]
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Pacific Cod
Allocations in the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) has
submitted Amendment 85 to the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
Management Area (FMP) to NMFS for
review. If approved, Amendment 85
would revise the current Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands management area
(BSAI) Pacific cod allocations of total
allowable catch (TAC) among various
harvest sectors, modify the management
of Pacific cod incidental catch in other
non-target fisheries, eliminate the
groundfish reserve for Pacific cod,
increase the percentage of the BSAI
Pacific cod TAC apportioned to the
Community Development Quota (CDQ)
Program, and add a new appendix to the
FMP that summarizes the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2005.
Amendment 85 is necessary to reduce
uncertainty about the availability of
yearly harvests within sectors caused by
reallocations, and to maintain stability
between sectors in the BSAI Pacific cod
fishery. This would be accomplished by
establishing allocations that more
closely reflect actual use by sector than
do current allocations while considering
socioeconomic and community factors,
thus reducing the need for reallocations
during the fishing year. This proposed
amendment also is necessary to
implement recent changes to the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) that require a
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70943
directed fishing allocation of 10 percent
to the CDQ Program upon the
establishment of a sector allocation.
This action is intended to promote the
goals and objectives of the MagnusonStevens Act, the FMP, and other
applicable laws. The amendment is
available for public review and
comment.
DATES: Comments on Amendment 85
must be received on or before February
5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Sue Salveson, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Walsh, Records Officer. Comments
may be submitted by:
• Hand delivery: 709 West 9th Street,
Room 420A, Juneau, AK;
• E-mail: 0648–AU48–BSA85–
NOA@noaa.gov. Include in the subject
line the following document identifier:
‘‘Pacific cod RIN 0648 AU48.’’ E-mail
comments, with or without attachments,
are limited to 5 megabytes;
• Fax: 907–586–7557;
• Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802–1668; or
• Webform at the Federal eRulemaking
Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions at that site for
submitting comments.
Copies of the Amendment 85
Environmental Assessment/Regulatory
Impact Review/Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (EA/RIR/IRFA)
prepared for this action are available
from the NMFS Alaska Region website
at www.fakr.noaa.gov or from the
mailing and street addresses listed
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Becky Carls, 907–586–7228 or
becky.carls@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Magnuson-Stevens Act requires that
each regional fishery management
council submit any FMP or FMP
amendment it prepares to NMFS for
review and approval, disapproval, or
partial approval by the Secretary. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act also requires
that NMFS, upon receiving an FMP
amendment, immediately publish a
notice in the Federal Register that the
FMP or amendment is available for
public review and comment. This
requirement is satisfied by this notice of
availability for Amendment 85.
The BSAI Pacific cod TAC, after
subtraction of reserves, currently is
subdivided, or allocated, among eight
non-CDQ fishing industry sectors based
on the type of fishing gear used
pursuant to regulations at 50 CFR
679.20(a)(7). Basically, these gear
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 2006)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70941-70943]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20770]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No 061127309-6309-01; I.D. 110706D]
RIN 0648-AU72
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species
Fisheries; Reporting Requirements and Conservation Measures
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes a regulation to implement new reporting and
conservation measures under the Coastal Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). These reporting requirements and prohibitive
measures would require coastal pelagic species (CPS) fishermen/vessel
operators to employ avoidance measures when southern sea otters are
present in the area they are fishing and to report any interactions
that may occur between their vessel and/or fishing gear and sea otters.
The purpose of this proposed rule is to comply with the terms and
conditions of an incidental take statement from a biological opinion
issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the
implementation of Amendment 11 to the CPS FMP.
DATES: Comments must be received by January 8, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this proposed rule, identified by
[insert ID] by any of the following methods:
E-mail: 0648-AU72.SWR@noaa.gov Include the I.D. number in
the subject line of the message.
Federal e-Rulemaking portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Rodney R. McInnis, Regional Administrator, Southwest
Region, NMFS, 501 West Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802-
4213.
Fax: (562) 980-4047.
Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or
other aspects of the collection-of-information
[[Page 70942]]
requirements contained in this proposed rule may be submitted to the
Southwest Regional Office and by e-mail to David--Rostker@omb.eop.gov
or fax to (202) 395-7285
Copies of Amendment 11 and its Environmental Assessment/ Regulatory
Impact Review may be obtained from the Southwest Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua B. Lindsay, Southwest Region,
NMFS, (562) 980-4034.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action proposes to implement new
reporting requirements and conservation measures under the Coastal
Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP). The purpose of the
proposed rule is to comply with the terms and conditions set forth in
the incidental take statement section of a biological opinion issued by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) regarding the implementation
of Amendment 11 and to provide further conservation efforts for the
threatened southern sea otter. These reporting requirements and
conservation measures would require all coastal pelagic species (CPS)
fishermen and vessel operators to employ avoidance measures when sea
otters are present in the fishing area and to report any interactions
that may occur between their vessel and/or fishing gear and the otters.
In accordance with the regulations implementing the Endangered
Species Act (ESA), the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)
initiated an ESA section 7 consultation with USFWS regarding the
possible effects of implementing Amendment 11 to the CPS FMP. The
purpose of the Amendment was to achieve optimal utilization of the
resource and equitable allocation of Pacific sardine harvest
opportunity. On June 16, 2006, USFWS completed a biological opinion on
Amendment 11 and concluded that it was not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of the southern sea otter. The final rule to
implement Amendment 11 was then published on June 29, 2006 (71 FR
36999) and changed the framework for annual apportionment of the
Pacific sardine harvest guideline along the U.S. Pacific coast.
These new measures and regulations would include:
1. CPS fishing boat operators and crew would be prohibited from
deploying their nets if a southern sea otter is observed within the
area that would be encircled by the purse seine.
2. If a southern sea otter is entangled in a net, regardless of
whether the animal is injured or killed, such an occurrence must be
reported within 24 hours to the Regional Administrator, NMFS Southwest
Region.
3. While fishing for CPS, vessel operators must record all
observations of otter interactions (defined as otters within encircled
nets or coming into contact with nets or vessels, including but not
limited to entanglement) with their purse seine net(s) or vessel(s).
With the exception of an entaglement, which will be initially reported
as described in 2 above, all other observations must be
reported within 20 days to the Regional Administrator.
When contacting NMFS after an interaction, fishermen would be
required to provide information regarding the location (latitude and
longitude) of the interaction and a description of the interaction
itself. If available, location information should also include: Water
depth, distance from shore, and relation to port or other landmarks.
Descriptive information of the interaction should include: whether or
not the otters were seen inside or outside the net, if inside the net,
had the net been completely encircled, did contact occur with net or
vessel, the number of otters present, duration of interaction, otter's
behavior during interaction, and measures taken to avoid interaction.
Classification
This proposed rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). This requirement has been submitted to OMB for approval. Public
reporting burden for this otter interaction requirement is estimated to
average 10 minutes per individual per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information.
Public comment is sought regarding: whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of infromation technology. Send comments on
these or any other aspects of the collection of information to NMFS
Southwest Region at the ADDRESSES above, and e-mail to David--
Rostker@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB Control Number.
These proposed specifications are issued under the authority of,
and NMFS has preliminarily determined that it is in accordance with,
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the FMP,
and the regulations implementing the FMP.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as follows:
A fishing vessel is considered a ``small'' business by the U.S.
Small Business Administration (SBA) if its annual receipts are not
in excess of $3.5 million. Since all of the vessels fishing for CPS
have annual receipts below $3.5 million they would all be considered
small businesses under the SBA standards. Therefore this rule will
not create disproportionate costs between small and large vessels/
businesses.
Otter interactions as described in this proposed rule are
extremely rare; therefore the burden to small businesses as a result
of these new regulations is expected to be minimal. The only
expected cost to the respondents will be the cost associated with
contacting NMFS, which may be made through mail, phone, fax, or
email. NMFS also does not anticipate a drop in profitability based
on this rule, as the proposed action should not have a substantial
effect on the methods fishermen use or the areas in which they fish.
The overlap between the distribution of the southern sea otter and
CPS fishing grounds is very limited. Where overlap does occur, a
small portion of Monterey Bay, otter interactions with CPS fishermen
have been very rare. Due to the limited potential for overlap the
fishermen's ability to harvest CPS will not be effected.
NMFS has determined that there will not be a significant
economic impact to a substantial number of these small entities.
Therefore, NMFS did not prepare an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis.
As a result, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
[[Page 70943]]
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries,
Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives, Indians, Northern Mariana Islands,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 4, 2006.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS proposes to amend 50
CFR part 660 as follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES AND IN THE WESTERN
PACIFIC
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 660.505, add paragraph (n) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.505 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(n) When fishing for CPS, deploy a net if a southern sea otter is
observed within the area that would be encircled by the purse seine
net.
3. Section 660.520 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 660.520 Reporting requirements.
(a) Otter interaction. (1) If a southern sea otter is entangled in
a net, regardless of whether the animal is injured or killed, the
vessel operator must report this interaction within 24 hours to the
Regional Administrator.
(2) While fishing for CPS, vessel operators must record all
observations of otter interactions (defined as otters within encircled
nets or coming into contact with nets or vessels, including but not
limited to entanglement) with their purse seine net(s) or vessel(s).
With the exception of an entanglement, which must be initially reported
as described in paragraph (a)(1)of this section, all other observations
must be reported within 20 days to the Regional Administrator.
(3) When contacting NMFS after an interaction, vessel operators
must provide the location (latitude and longitude) of the interaction
and a description of the interaction itself. If available, location
information should also include water depth, distance from shore, and
relation to port or other landmarks. Descriptive information of the
interaction should include: whether or not the otters were seen inside
or outside the net; if inside the net, had the net been completely
encircled; whether any otters came in contact with either the net or
the vessel; the number of otters present; duration of interaction;
otter's behavior during interaction; measures taken to avoid
interaction.
(b) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. E6-20770 Filed 12-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S