Findings of Research Misconduct, 70966-70967 [E6-20754]
Download as PDF
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
70966
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) by R.O.
White & Company, Inc. and Ceres
Marine Terminals, Inc.
(‘‘Complainants’’), against the Port of
Miami Terminal Operating Company,
L.L.C. (‘‘POMTOC’’); Continental
Stevedoring & Terminals, Inc.; Florida
Stevedoring, Inc.; P&O Ports North
America, Inc.; P&O Ports Florida, Inc.;
Eller-Ito Stevedoring Company, L.L.C.;
and Dante B. Fascell Port of Miami–
Dade, aka Miami–Dade County Seaport
Department (‘‘Respondents’’).
Complainants assert that Ceres Marine
Terminals, Inc. performs stevedoring
and/or marine terminal services at
numerous ports in the United States and
Canada, and R.O. White & Company is
a wholly owned subsidiary of Ceres who
holds a permit issued by Respondent
Miami–Dade County Seaport
Department (‘‘The Port’’) to perform
stevedoring services at the Port.
Complainants assert that all of the
Respondents are marine terminal
operators as defined in Section 3(14) of
the Shipping Act of 1984 (‘‘The Act’’),
46 U.S.C. 40102(14).
Complainants contend that
Respondents have violated the Shipping
Act in several ways. First, they contend
that Respondents, who are parties to
FMC Agreement No. 224–200616, have
violated sections 5(a), 10(a)(2), and
10(a)(3) of the Act (46 U.S.C. 40302(a),
41102(b)(1) and (b)(2)) by: ‘‘failing to file
their actual agreements; operating
pursuant to agreements that were
required to be filed, but not filed;
operating outside and/or contrary to the
terms of their filed agreement; and
collectively agreeing to refuse R.O.
White permission to perform
stevedoring services at POMTOC
facilities.’’ (Complaint at 11–12).
Second, Complainants assert that
POMTOC and/or its members 1 have
violated sections 10(b)(10), 10(d)(1),
10(d)(3), and 10(d)(4) of the Act (46
U.S.C. 41104(10), 41102(c), 41106(3)
and 41106(2)) by: Using POMTOC as a
device to exclude competition for
stevedoring services; precluding ocean
common carriers from using R.O. White
as their stevedore; refusing to allow R.O.
White to use its Port-granted license to
perform stevedoring services at
POMTOC; requiring common carriers to
use only POMTOC members for
stevedoring services; and ‘‘denying R.O.
White access to POMTOC while
allowing access to other entities for the
same or similar purposes.’’ (Complaint
at 12). Third, Complainants assert that
the Port violated sections 10(b)(10),
10(d)(1), 10(d)(3), and 10(d)(4) of the
1 POMTOC is a marine terminal services provider
that was formed by four of the Respondents.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
Act (46 U.S.C. 41104(10), 41102(c),
41106(3) and 41106(2)) by: ‘‘failing to
prevent other Respondents from
engaging in the unlawful conduct
alleged in Counts I and II above; failing
to ensure access by qualified stevedores
to the only public, multi-user cargo
terminal at the Port’’; (Complaint at 13)
and failing to re-evaluate the current
process and competitive structure for
providing stevedore services at the Port.
Complainants pray that the Commission
require Respondents to answer to the
charges, order Respondents to cease and
desist the aforesaid violations, establish
and put in force such practices and
policies as the Commission determines
to be lawful and reasonable; require
Respondents to pay reparations to
Complainants for the unlawful conduct
including interest and attorney’s fees,
and to make any further order or orders
the Commission determines to be
proper.
This proceeding has been assigned to
the Office of Administrative Law Judges.
Hearing in this matter, if any is held,
shall commence within the time
limitations prescribed in 46 CFR 502.61,
and only after consideration has been
given by the parties and the presiding
officer to the use of alternative forms of
dispute resolution. The hearing shall
include oral testimony and crossexamination in the discretion of the
presiding officer only upon proper
showing that there are genuine issues of
material fact that cannot be resolved on
the basis of sworn statements, affidavits,
depositions, or other documents or that
the nature of the matter in issue is such
that an oral hearing and crossexamination are necessary for the
development of an adequate record.
Pursuant to the further terms of 46 CFR
502.61, the initial decision of the
presiding officer in this proceeding shall
be issued by November 30, 2007, and
the final decision of the Commission
shall be issued by March 10, 2008.
By the Commission.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6–20757 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Findings of Research Misconduct
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Office of Research Integrity (ORI)
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and the Assistant Secretary for Health
have taken final action in the following
case:
Jennifer Blaisdell, University of
Pennsylvania and Retinal Consultants
of Arizona, Ltd.: Based on the report of
an investigation conducted by the
University of Pennsylvania (UP) and
additional analysis conducted by ORI in
its oversight review, the U.S. Public
Health Service (PHS) found that Ms.
Jennifer Blaisdell, former Clinical
Coordinator for Retinal Consultants of
Arizona, Ltd. (RCA), committed
research misconduct in a study
sponsored by two cooperative
agreements funded by the National Eye
Institute (NEI), National Institutes of
Health (NIH): U10 EY012261, ‘‘Agerelated Macular Degeneration
Prevention Trial,’’ Dr. Stuart Fine,
Principal Investigator (P.I.), and U10
EY012279, ‘‘Coordinating Center for
AMD, Complications of Age-Related
Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial’’
(CAPT), Dr. Maureen McGuire, P.I.
Specifically, PHS found that Ms.
Blaisdell knowingly and intentionally
committed research misconduct by:
1. Fabricating a CAPT data form dated
5/29/02 reporting a 30-month telephone
follow-up visit with patient 01–026; this
patient died on 5/3/02;
2. Fabricating a CAPT data form dated
2/20/03 reporting a 43-month telephone
follow-up visit with patient 01–019; this
patient died on 2/10/03;
3. Falsifying a CAPT data form dated
2/13/01 reporting a visit to the clinic on
that date for patient 01–049; this
patient’s visit was 2/20/01;
4. Falsifying the CAPT form for
patient 01–055 dated 4/11/01, when no
clinic visit took place, by substituting
information purportedly obtained at a
non-study visit on 2/28/01.
Ms. Blaisdell has entered into a
Voluntary Exclusion Agreement in
which she has voluntarily agreed, for a
period of two (2) years, beginning on
November 14, 2006:
(1) To exclude herself from serving in
any advisory capacity to PHS, including
but not limited to service on any PHS
advisory committee, board, and/or peer
review committee, or as a consultant;
and
(2) That any institution that submits
an application for PHS support for a
research project on which Ms.
Blaisdell’s participation is proposed or
which uses her in any capacity on PHS
supported research, or that submits a
report of PHS-funded research in which
she is involved, must concurrently
submit a plan for supervision of Ms.
Blaisdell’s duties to the funding agency
for approval. The supervisory plan must
be designed to ensure the scientific
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Notices
integrity of her research contribution.
Ms. Blaisdell also agrees to ensure that
the institution submits a copy of the
supervisory plan to ORI. She further
agrees that she will not participate in
any PHS-supported research until such
a supervisory plan is submitted to ORI.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director, Division of Investigative
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity,
1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite 750,
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453–8800.
Chris B. Pascal,
Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. E6–20754 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–31–P
Dated: December 1, 2006.
Alvin Hall,
Director, Management Analysis and Services
Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
[FR Doc. E6–20755 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
National Center for Environmental
Health/Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
The Program Peer Review
Subcommittee of the Board of Scientific
Counselors (BSC), Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), National
Center for Environmental Health/
Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (NCEH/ATSDR):
Teleconference.
In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463), CDC, NCEH/ATSDR
announces the following subcommittee
meeting:
Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.–10:30 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time, December 19, 2006.
Place: The teleconference will originate at
NCEH/ATSDR in Atlanta, Georgia. To
participate, dial 877/315–6535 and enter
conference code 383520.
Purpose: Under the charge of the BSC,
NCEH/ATSDR, the PPRS will provide the
BSC, NCEH/ATSDR with advice and
recommendations on NCEH/ATSDR program
peer review. They will serve the function of
organizing, facilitating, and providing a longterm perspective to the conduct of NCEH/
ATSDR program peer review.
Matters to be Discussed: An overview of
PPRS activities; a review of the November
meeting; an update on the Site Specific
Activities Peer Review; re-visit approval of
the Peer Reviewer Conflict-of-interest Form;
and a discussion on Preparedness and
Emergency Response Peer Review scheduled
for February 2007: Breadth and approach of
the review, areas of expertise required for the
review, nominations for a PPRS panel
member, a chairperson, peer reviewers,
partners, and customers. Agenda items are
subject to change as priorities dictate.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public
comment period is scheduled for 9:35–
9:45 a.m. Due to programmatic matters,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:29 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
this Federal Register Notice is being
published on less than 15 calendar days
notice to the public (41 CFR 102–
3.150(b)).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sandra Malcom, Committee
Management Specialist, Office of
Science, NCEH/ATSDR, M/S E–28, 1600
Clifton Road, NE., Atlanta, Georgia
30333, telephone 404/498–0622.
The Director, Management Analysis
and Services Office, has been delegated
the authority to sign Federal Register
notices pertaining to announcements of
meetings and other committee
management activities for both CDC and
NCEH/ATSDR.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
Privacy Act of 1974; Report of a
Modified or Altered System of Records
AGENCY: Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS), Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
ACTION: Notice of a Modified or Altered
System of Records (SOR).
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
requirements of the Privacy Act of 1974,
CMS is proposing to modify or alter
existing system of records titled
‘‘Medicare Exclusion Database’’ (MED),
System No. 09–70–0534,’’ established at
67 Federal Register 8810 (February 26,
2002). We propose to modify existing
routine use number 1 that permits
disclosure to agency contractors and
consultants to include disclosure to
CMS grantees who perform a task for the
agency. CMS grantees, charged with
completing projects or activities that
require CMS data to carry out that
activity, are classified separate from
CMS contractors and/or consultants.
The modified routine use will remain as
routine use number 1.
Published routine use number 2 and
3 will be combined as one because both
are written to complete the same or
similar purpose. Disclosures allowed by
published routine uses numbers 2, and
3 will be covered by a new routine use
numbered 2 to permit release of
information to ‘‘another Federal and/or
State agency, agency of a State
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70967
government, an agency established by
State law, or its fiscal agent.’’ The scope
of this routine use has been broadened
to include State Medicaid agencies
when disclosure of the information
proved compatible with the purpose for
which CMS collects the information. We
will delete routine use number 5
authorizing disclosure to support
constituent requests made to a
congressional representative. If an
authorization for the disclosure has
been obtained from the data subject,
then no routine use is needed. The
Privacy Act allows for disclosures with
the ‘‘prior written consent’’ of the data
subject.
Finally, we will delete the section
titled ‘‘Additional Circumstances
Affecting Routine Use Disclosures,’’ that
addresses ‘‘Protected Health Information
(PHI)’’ and ‘‘small cell size.’’ The
requirement for compliance with HHS
regulation ‘‘Standards for Privacy of
Individually Identifiable Health
Information’’ does not apply because
this system does not collect or maintain
PHI. In addition, our policy to prohibit
release if there is a possibility that an
individual can be identified through
‘‘small cell size’’ is not applicable to the
data maintained in this system.
We are modifying the language in the
remaining routine uses to provide a
proper explanation as to the need for the
routine use and to provide clarity to
CMS’s intention to disclose individualspecific information contained in this
system. The routine uses will then be
prioritized and reordered according to
their usage. We will also take the
opportunity to update any sections of
the system that were affected by the
recent reorganization or because of the
impact of the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement, and Modernization
Act of 2003 (MMA) (Public Law 108–
173) provisions and to update language
in the administrative sections to
correspond with language used in other
CMS SORs.
The primary purpose of this system of
records is to collect and maintain
information on individuals that have
been excluded from receiving Medicare
payments for any item or service
furnished during the period when
excluded from participation in the
Medicare program. Information
maintained in this system will also be
disclosed to: (1) Support regulatory,
reimbursement, and policy functions
performed within the Agency or by a
contractor, consultant or CMS grantee;
(2) assist another Federal or State
agency, agency of a State government,
an agency established by State law, or
its fiscal agent; (3) facilitate research on
the quality and effectiveness of care
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70966-70967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20754]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the Secretary
Findings of Research Misconduct
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity
(ORI) and the Assistant Secretary for Health have taken final action in
the following case:
Jennifer Blaisdell, University of Pennsylvania and Retinal
Consultants of Arizona, Ltd.: Based on the report of an investigation
conducted by the University of Pennsylvania (UP) and additional
analysis conducted by ORI in its oversight review, the U.S. Public
Health Service (PHS) found that Ms. Jennifer Blaisdell, former Clinical
Coordinator for Retinal Consultants of Arizona, Ltd. (RCA), committed
research misconduct in a study sponsored by two cooperative agreements
funded by the National Eye Institute (NEI), National Institutes of
Health (NIH): U10 EY012261, ``Age-related Macular Degeneration
Prevention Trial,'' Dr. Stuart Fine, Principal Investigator (P.I.), and
U10 EY012279, ``Coordinating Center for AMD, Complications of Age-
Related Macular Degeneration Prevention Trial'' (CAPT), Dr. Maureen
McGuire, P.I.
Specifically, PHS found that Ms. Blaisdell knowingly and
intentionally committed research misconduct by:
1. Fabricating a CAPT data form dated 5/29/02 reporting a 30-month
telephone follow-up visit with patient 01-026; this patient died on 5/
3/02;
2. Fabricating a CAPT data form dated 2/20/03 reporting a 43-month
telephone follow-up visit with patient 01-019; this patient died on 2/
10/03;
3. Falsifying a CAPT data form dated 2/13/01 reporting a visit to
the clinic on that date for patient 01-049; this patient's visit was 2/
20/01;
4. Falsifying the CAPT form for patient 01-055 dated 4/11/01, when
no clinic visit took place, by substituting information purportedly
obtained at a non-study visit on 2/28/01.
Ms. Blaisdell has entered into a Voluntary Exclusion Agreement in
which she has voluntarily agreed, for a period of two (2) years,
beginning on November 14, 2006:
(1) To exclude herself from serving in any advisory capacity to
PHS, including but not limited to service on any PHS advisory
committee, board, and/or peer review committee, or as a consultant; and
(2) That any institution that submits an application for PHS
support for a research project on which Ms. Blaisdell's participation
is proposed or which uses her in any capacity on PHS supported
research, or that submits a report of PHS-funded research in which she
is involved, must concurrently submit a plan for supervision of Ms.
Blaisdell's duties to the funding agency for approval. The supervisory
plan must be designed to ensure the scientific
[[Page 70967]]
integrity of her research contribution. Ms. Blaisdell also agrees to
ensure that the institution submits a copy of the supervisory plan to
ORI. She further agrees that she will not participate in any PHS-
supported research until such a supervisory plan is submitted to ORI.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Division of Investigative
Oversight, Office of Research Integrity, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Suite
750, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 453-8800.
Chris B. Pascal,
Director, Office of Research Integrity.
[FR Doc. E6-20754 Filed 12-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-31-P