Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Model G-159 Airplanes, 70868-70870 [E6-20620]
Download as PDF
70868
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
of this AD: Perform the initial inspection
required by paragraph (i) of this AD within
1,000 landings after the effective date of this
AD.
Additional Inspections
(k) For airplanes on which the inspections
specified in paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(4), (h)(2),
and (h)(4) of this AD are accomplished after
the effective date of this AD: Where this AD
requires an eddy current inspection for
cracks, do a detailed inspection for corrosion
at the same time as the eddy current
inspection for cracks, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300–53–0218, Revision 03,
dated August 3, 2006.
(l) For airplanes on which the inspections
specified in paragraphs (f)(2) and (h)(2) of
this AD are accomplished after the effective
date of this AD: If any crack is found during
any inspection required by paragraph (f)(2) or
(h)(2), before further flight, do an X-ray
inspection for cracking of the rim area of the
rear pressure bulkhead in the area of STGR
21 LH and RH in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300–53–0218, Revision 03,
dated August 3, 2006.
New Repetitive Inspections
(m) For airplanes on which a repair has
been done in accordance with Airbus Service
Bulletin A300–53–218, Revision 1, dated July
28, 1989; Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–
0218, Revision 02, dated May 10, 2005; or
Revision 03, dated August 3, 2006; before the
effective date of this AD: At the later of the
times specified in paragraphs (m)(1) and
(m)(2) of this AD, do the inspections
specified in paragraphs (h), (k), and (l) of this
AD. Repeat the inspections specified in
paragraphs (h), (k), and (l) of this AD
thereafter at the applicable times specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD.
(1) Within the times specified in paragraph
(h) of this AD.
(2) Within 2,000 landings after the effective
date of this AD.
Corrective Actions for Cracking and
Corrosion and Repetitive Inspections
(n) If cracking or corrosion is found during
any inspection required by paragraph (f), (h),
(k), (l) or (m) of this AD, repair prior to
further flight, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300–53–218, Revision 1,
dated July 28, 1989; or Airbus Service
Bulletin A300–53–0218, Revision 03, dated
August 3, 2006. As of the effective date of
this AD, do the repair in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A300–53–0218, Revision 03,
dated August 3, 2006; except where the
service bulletin specifies to contact the
manufacturer to repair certain conditions,
this AD requires repairing those conditions
using a method approved by either the
Manager, International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) (or
its delegated agent). As of the effective date
of this AD, repeat the inspections specified
in paragraphs (h), (k), and (l) of this AD
thereafter at the applicable times specified in
paragraph (h) of this AD.
Actions Accomplished According to Previous
Issue of Service Bulletin
(o) Actions accomplished before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with
Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–0218,
Revision 02, dated May 10, 2005, are
considered acceptable for compliance with
the corresponding actions specified in this
AD.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(p)(1) The Manager, International Branch,
ANM–116, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
(3) AMOCs approved previously in
accordance with AD 90–03–08 are not
approved as AMOCs with this AD.
Related Information
(q) French airworthiness directive F–2005–
093 R1, dated August 3, 2005, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
Material Incorporated by Reference
(r) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin
A300–53–218, Revision 1, dated July 28,
1989; and Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–
0218, Revision 03, dated August 3, 2006; as
applicable; to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. Airbus Service Bulletin A300–53–
218, Revision 1, dated July 28, 1989, contains
the following effective pages:
Page Nos.
Revision level shown on page
Date shown on
page
1–4, 7, 8, 16, 19–25 ...............................................................
5, 6, 9–15, 17, 18 ...................................................................
Revision 1 ..............................................................................
Original ...................................................................................
July 28, 1989.
February 20, 1989.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
The Director of the Federal Register approved
the incorporation by reference of these
documents in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Airbus, 1
Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France, for a copy of this service
information. You may review copies at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Room PL–401, Nassif Building,
Washington, DC; on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this
material at the NARA, call (202) 741–6030,
or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 20, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–20616 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:43 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 96–NM–143–AD; Amendment
39–14843; AD 2006–25–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream
Model G–159 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a
new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to all Gulfstream Model
G–159 airplanes, that requires repetitive
non-destructive testing inspections to
detect corrosion of the skin of certain
structural assemblies, and corrective
action if necessary. This AD also
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requires x-ray and ultrasonic
inspections to detect corrosion and
cracking of the splicing of certain
structural assemblies, and repair if
necessary. The actions specified by this
AD are intended to detect and correct
corrosion and cracking of the lower
wing plank splices and spot-welded
skins of certain structural assemblies,
which could result in reduced
controllability of the airplane. This
action is intended to address the
identified unsafe condition.
DATES: Effective January 11, 2007.
The incorporation by reference of a
certain publication listed in the
regulations is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of January 11,
2007.
ADDRESSES: The service information
referenced in this AD may be obtained
from Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation,
Technical Publications Dept., P.O. Box
2206, Savannah, Georgia 31402–2206.
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
This information may be examined at
the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate,
Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington; or at the FAA,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office,
One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix
Boulevard, Suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Cann, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE–117A, FAA,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office,
One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix
Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia
30349; telephone (770) 703–6038; fax
(770) 703–6097.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A
proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to
include an airworthiness directive (AD)
that is applicable to all Gulfstream
Model G–159 airplanes was published
as a second supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the
Federal Register on July 12, 2006 (71 FR
39242). That action proposed to require
repetitive non-destructive testing
inspections to detect corrosion of the
skin of certain structural assemblies,
and corrective action if necessary. That
action also proposed to require x-ray
and ultrasonic inspections to detect
corrosion and cracking of the splicing of
certain structural assemblies, and repair
if necessary.
Interested persons have been afforded
an opportunity to participate in the
making of this amendment. Due
consideration has been given to the
comments received.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Request To Incorporate by Reference
Service Information
One commenter, the Modification and
Replacement Parts Association
(MARPA), requests that service
documents deemed essential to the
accomplishment of the proposed action
be incorporated by reference into the
regulatory instrument. The commenter
states that once a service document is
incorporated by reference into a public
document such as an airworthiness
directive (AD), it loses its private,
protected status and becomes itself a
public document. The commenter also
states that there is concern that failure
to incorporate essential service
information could result in a court
decision invalidating the AD.
We do not agree that documents
should be incorporated by reference
during the NPRM phase of rulemaking.
The Office of the Federal Register
requires that documents that are
necessary to accomplish the
requirements of the AD be incorporated
by reference during the final rule phase
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:43 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
of rulemaking. This final rule
incorporates by reference the document
necessary for the accomplishment of the
requirements mandated by this AD.
Further, we point out that while
documents that are incorporated by
reference do become public information,
they do not lose their copyright
protection. For that reason, we advise
the public to contact the manufacturer
to obtain copies of the referenced
service information. No change is
necessary to the AD in this regard.
Request To Publish Appropriate
Service Information
The same commenter, MARPA, also
requests that service information
necessary to accomplish actions
specified in ADs be published in the
Docket Management System (DMS).
We are currently in the process of
reviewing issues surrounding the
posting of service bulletins on the
Department of Transportation’s DMS as
part of an AD docket. Once we have
thoroughly examined all aspects of this
issue and have made a final
determination, we will consider
whether our current practice needs to be
revised. No change is necessary to the
AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the
available data, including the comments
received, and determined that air safety
and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed in the second
supplemental NPRM.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 52 airplanes
of the affected design in the worldwide
fleet. The FAA estimates that 25
airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected
by this AD, that it will take
approximately between 300 and 450
work hours per airplane, depending
upon how many spot-welded skins have
been replaced with bonded skin panels,
to accomplish the required actions, and
that the average labor rate is $80 per
work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of this AD on U.S. operators
is estimated to be between $600,000 and
$900,000, or between $24,000 and
$36,000 per airplane, per inspection
cycle.
The cost impact figures discussed
above are based on assumptions that no
operator has yet accomplished any of
the proposed requirements of this AD
action, and that no operator would
accomplish those actions in the future if
this AD were not adopted. The cost
impact figures discussed in AD
rulemaking actions represent only the
time necessary to perform the specific
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70869
actions actually required by the AD.
These figures typically do not include
incidental costs, such as the time
required to gain access and close up,
planning time, or time necessitated by
other administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, it is
determined that this final rule does not
have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this action (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3)
will not have a significant economic
impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has
been prepared for this action and it is
contained in the Rules Docket. A copy
of it may be obtained from the Rules
Docket at the location provided under
the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
n
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
n
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
n
2006–25–02 Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation: Amendment 39–14843.
Docket 96–NM–143–AD.
Applicability: All Model G–159 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless
accomplished previously.
To detect and correct corrosion and
cracking of the lower wing plank splices and
spot-welded skins of certain structural
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
70870
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 235 / Thursday, December 7, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
assemblies, which could result in reduced
controllability of the airplane, accomplish
the following:
Note 1: A note in the Accomplishment
Instructions of the Gulfstream customer
bulletin instructs operators to contact
Gulfstream if any difficulty is encountered in
accomplishing the customer bulletin.
However, any deviation from the instructions
provided in the customer bulletin must be
approved as an alternative method of
compliance (AMOC) under paragraph (h) of
this AD.
Non-Destructive Testing Inspections of the
Fuselage, Empennage, and Flight Controls
(a) Within 9 months after the effective date
of this AD, perform a non-destructive test
(NDT) to detect corrosion of the skins of the
elevators, ailerons, rudder and rudder trim
tab, flaps, aft lower fuselage, and vertical and
horizontal stabilizers; in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Gulfstream
GI Customer Bulletin (CB) 337B, including
Appendix A, dated August 17, 2005. The
corrosion criteria must be determined by the
Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), FAA. Gulfstream Tool ST905–377 is
also an acceptable method of determining the
corrosion criteria.
(1) If no corrosion or cracking is detected,
repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 18 months.
(2) If any corrosion is detected that meets
the criteria of ‘‘light’’ or ‘‘mild’’ corrosion,
repeat the NDT inspections of that
component thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 12 months.
(3) If any corrosion is detected that meets
the criteria of ‘‘moderate’’ corrosion: Within
9 months after the initial inspection, repeat
the NDT inspection of that component, and
within 18 months since the initial inspection,
repair or replace the component with a
serviceable component in accordance with
the CB.
(4) If any corrosion is detected that meets
the criteria of ‘‘severe’’ corrosion, before
further flight, replace the component with a
serviceable component in accordance with
the CB.
Existing Repairs
(b) If any existing repairs are found during
the inspections required by paragraph (a) of
this AD, before further flight, ensure that the
repairs are in accordance with a method
approved by the Manager, Atlanta ACO.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
Inspections of the Lower Wing Plank
(c) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of
this AD: Within 9 months after the effective
date of this AD, perform NDT inspections to
detect corrosion and cracking of the lower
wing plank splices, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Gulfstream
GI CB 337B, including Appendix A, dated
August 17, 2005.
(1) If no corrosion or cracking is detected,
repeat the NDT inspection at intervals not to
exceed 18 months.
(2) If any corrosion or cracking is detected,
before further flight, perform all applicable
investigative actions and corrective actions in
accordance with the customer bulletin.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:43 Dec 06, 2006
Jkt 211001
Repair Removal Threshold
(d) For repairs specified in Appendix A of
Gulfstream GI CB 337B, dated August 17,
2005: Within 144 months after the date of the
repair installation, remove the repaired
component and replace it with a new or
serviceable component, in accordance with
Gulfstream GI CB 337B, including Appendix
A, dated August 17, 2005.
Prior Blending in the Riser Areas
(e) If, during the performance of the
inspections required by paragraph (c) or (f) of
this AD, the inspection reveals that prior
blending has been performed on the riser
areas: Before further flight, perform an eddy
current or fluorescent penetrant inspection,
as applicable, to evaluate the blending, and
accomplish appropriate corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Gulfstream GI CB 337B,
including Appendix A, dated August 17,
2005. If any blend-out is outside the limits
specified in the CB, before further flight,
repair in a manner approved by the Manager,
Atlanta ACO.
For Airplanes with New Lower Wing Planks
(f) For airplanes with new lower wing
planks: Within 144 months after replacement
of the lower wing planks with new lower
wing planks, or within 9 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, perform all of the actions, including all
related investigative actions and corrective
actions, specified in paragraph (c) of this AD.
Reporting Requirement
(g) Within 30 days of performing the
inspections required by this AD: Submit a
report of inspection findings (both positive
and negative) to Gulfstream Aerospace
Corporation; Attention: Technical
Operations—Structures Group, Dept. 893,
Mail Station D–25, 500 Gulfstream Road,
Savannah, Georgia 31408. Information
collection requirements contained in this
regulation have been approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 2120–0056.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(h)(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in
accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA
Flight Standards Certificate Holding District
Office.
Incorporation by Reference
(i) Unless otherwise specified in this AD,
the actions must be done in accordance with
Gulfstream GI Customer Bulletin 337B,
including Appendix A, dated August 17,
2005. This incorporation by reference was
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a)
and 1 CFR part 51. To get copies of this
service information, contact Gulfstream
Aerospace Corporation, Technical
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Publications Dept., P.O. Box 2206, Savannah,
Georgia 31402–2206. To inspect copies of
this service information, go to the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; to FAA,
Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, One
Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix Boulevard, suite
450, Atlanta, Georgia; or to the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741–
6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/
ibr_locations.html.
Effective Date
(j) This amendment becomes effective on
January 11, 2007.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 20, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E6–20620 Filed 12–6–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 2
[Docket No. 2006N–0416]
RIN 0910–AF93
Use of Ozone-Depleting Substances;
Removal of Essential Use
Designations
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending its
regulation on the use of ozone-depleting
substances (ODSs) in pressurized
containers to remove the essential use
designations for beclomethasone,
dexamethasone, fluticasone, bitolterol,
salmeterol, ergotamine tartrate, and
ipratropium bromide used in oral
pressurized metered-dose inhalers
(MDIs). Under the Clean Air Act, FDA,
in consultation with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), is required to
determine whether an FDA-regulated
product that releases an ODS is
essential. None of these products is
currently being marketed, which
provides grounds for removing their
essential use designation. We are using
direct final rulemaking for this action
because the agency expects that there
will be no significant adverse comment
on the rule. In the proposed rule section
in this issue of the Federal Register, we
are concurrently proposing and
soliciting comments on this rule. If
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 235 (Thursday, December 7, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70868-70870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20620]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 96-NM-143-AD; Amendment 39-14843; AD 2006-25-02]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Gulfstream Model G-159 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD),
applicable to all Gulfstream Model G-159 airplanes, that requires
repetitive non-destructive testing inspections to detect corrosion of
the skin of certain structural assemblies, and corrective action if
necessary. This AD also requires x-ray and ultrasonic inspections to
detect corrosion and cracking of the splicing of certain structural
assemblies, and repair if necessary. The actions specified by this AD
are intended to detect and correct corrosion and cracking of the lower
wing plank splices and spot-welded skins of certain structural
assemblies, which could result in reduced controllability of the
airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe
condition.
DATES: Effective January 11, 2007.
The incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of January 11, 2007.
ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be
obtained from Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Technical Publications
Dept., P.O. Box 2206, Savannah, Georgia 31402-2206.
[[Page 70869]]
This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue,
SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification
Office, One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix Boulevard, Suite 450, Atlanta,
Georgia.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Cann, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office,
One Crown Center, 1895 Phoenix Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia
30349; telephone (770) 703-6038; fax (770) 703-6097.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to all Gulfstream Model G-159
airplanes was published as a second supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register on July 12, 2006 (71 FR
39242). That action proposed to require repetitive non-destructive
testing inspections to detect corrosion of the skin of certain
structural assemblies, and corrective action if necessary. That action
also proposed to require x-ray and ultrasonic inspections to detect
corrosion and cracking of the splicing of certain structural
assemblies, and repair if necessary.
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate
in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to
the comments received.
Request To Incorporate by Reference Service Information
One commenter, the Modification and Replacement Parts Association
(MARPA), requests that service documents deemed essential to the
accomplishment of the proposed action be incorporated by reference into
the regulatory instrument. The commenter states that once a service
document is incorporated by reference into a public document such as an
airworthiness directive (AD), it loses its private, protected status
and becomes itself a public document. The commenter also states that
there is concern that failure to incorporate essential service
information could result in a court decision invalidating the AD.
We do not agree that documents should be incorporated by reference
during the NPRM phase of rulemaking. The Office of the Federal Register
requires that documents that are necessary to accomplish the
requirements of the AD be incorporated by reference during the final
rule phase of rulemaking. This final rule incorporates by reference the
document necessary for the accomplishment of the requirements mandated
by this AD. Further, we point out that while documents that are
incorporated by reference do become public information, they do not
lose their copyright protection. For that reason, we advise the public
to contact the manufacturer to obtain copies of the referenced service
information. No change is necessary to the AD in this regard.
Request To Publish Appropriate Service Information
The same commenter, MARPA, also requests that service information
necessary to accomplish actions specified in ADs be published in the
Docket Management System (DMS).
We are currently in the process of reviewing issues surrounding the
posting of service bulletins on the Department of Transportation's DMS
as part of an AD docket. Once we have thoroughly examined all aspects
of this issue and have made a final determination, we will consider
whether our current practice needs to be revised. No change is
necessary to the AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD as proposed in the second supplemental
NPRM.
Cost Impact
There are approximately 52 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 25 airplanes of U.S. registry
will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately between
300 and 450 work hours per airplane, depending upon how many spot-
welded skins have been replaced with bonded skin panels, to accomplish
the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $80 per work
hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD on U.S.
operators is estimated to be between $600,000 and $900,000, or between
$24,000 and $36,000 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions
that no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements
of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions
in the future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures
discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to
perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures
typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to
gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other
administrative actions.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it
is determined that this final rule does not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) Is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
(2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a
significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action
and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained
from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2006-25-02 Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation: Amendment 39-14843.
Docket 96-NM-143-AD.
Applicability: All Model G-159 airplanes, certificated in any
category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To detect and correct corrosion and cracking of the lower wing
plank splices and spot-welded skins of certain structural
[[Page 70870]]
assemblies, which could result in reduced controllability of the
airplane, accomplish the following:
Note 1: A note in the Accomplishment Instructions of the
Gulfstream customer bulletin instructs operators to contact
Gulfstream if any difficulty is encountered in accomplishing the
customer bulletin. However, any deviation from the instructions
provided in the customer bulletin must be approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) under paragraph (h) of this AD.
Non-Destructive Testing Inspections of the Fuselage, Empennage, and
Flight Controls
(a) Within 9 months after the effective date of this AD, perform
a non-destructive test (NDT) to detect corrosion of the skins of the
elevators, ailerons, rudder and rudder trim tab, flaps, aft lower
fuselage, and vertical and horizontal stabilizers; in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Gulfstream GI Customer
Bulletin (CB) 337B, including Appendix A, dated August 17, 2005. The
corrosion criteria must be determined by the Manager, Atlanta
Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. Gulfstream Tool ST905-377
is also an acceptable method of determining the corrosion criteria.
(1) If no corrosion or cracking is detected, repeat the
inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 18 months.
(2) If any corrosion is detected that meets the criteria of
``light'' or ``mild'' corrosion, repeat the NDT inspections of that
component thereafter at intervals not to exceed 12 months.
(3) If any corrosion is detected that meets the criteria of
``moderate'' corrosion: Within 9 months after the initial
inspection, repeat the NDT inspection of that component, and within
18 months since the initial inspection, repair or replace the
component with a serviceable component in accordance with the CB.
(4) If any corrosion is detected that meets the criteria of
``severe'' corrosion, before further flight, replace the component
with a serviceable component in accordance with the CB.
Existing Repairs
(b) If any existing repairs are found during the inspections
required by paragraph (a) of this AD, before further flight, ensure
that the repairs are in accordance with a method approved by the
Manager, Atlanta ACO.
Inspections of the Lower Wing Plank
(c) Except as provided in paragraph (f) of this AD: Within 9
months after the effective date of this AD, perform NDT inspections
to detect corrosion and cracking of the lower wing plank splices, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Gulfstream GI CB
337B, including Appendix A, dated August 17, 2005.
(1) If no corrosion or cracking is detected, repeat the NDT
inspection at intervals not to exceed 18 months.
(2) If any corrosion or cracking is detected, before further
flight, perform all applicable investigative actions and corrective
actions in accordance with the customer bulletin.
Repair Removal Threshold
(d) For repairs specified in Appendix A of Gulfstream GI CB
337B, dated August 17, 2005: Within 144 months after the date of the
repair installation, remove the repaired component and replace it
with a new or serviceable component, in accordance with Gulfstream
GI CB 337B, including Appendix A, dated August 17, 2005.
Prior Blending in the Riser Areas
(e) If, during the performance of the inspections required by
paragraph (c) or (f) of this AD, the inspection reveals that prior
blending has been performed on the riser areas: Before further
flight, perform an eddy current or fluorescent penetrant inspection,
as applicable, to evaluate the blending, and accomplish appropriate
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Gulfstream GI CB 337B, including Appendix A, dated
August 17, 2005. If any blend-out is outside the limits specified in
the CB, before further flight, repair in a manner approved by the
Manager, Atlanta ACO.
For Airplanes with New Lower Wing Planks
(f) For airplanes with new lower wing planks: Within 144 months
after replacement of the lower wing planks with new lower wing
planks, or within 9 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs later, perform all of the actions, including all
related investigative actions and corrective actions, specified in
paragraph (c) of this AD.
Reporting Requirement
(g) Within 30 days of performing the inspections required by
this AD: Submit a report of inspection findings (both positive and
negative) to Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation; Attention: Technical
Operations--Structures Group, Dept. 893, Mail Station D-25, 500
Gulfstream Road, Savannah, Georgia 31408. Information collection
requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been
assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(h)(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec.
39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the
appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards
Certificate Holding District Office.
Incorporation by Reference
(i) Unless otherwise specified in this AD, the actions must be
done in accordance with Gulfstream GI Customer Bulletin 337B,
including Appendix A, dated August 17, 2005. This incorporation by
reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To get copies of
this service information, contact Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation,
Technical Publications Dept., P.O. Box 2206, Savannah, Georgia
31402-2206. To inspect copies of this service information, go to the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; to FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office, One Crown
Center, 1895 Phoenix Boulevard, suite 450, Atlanta, Georgia; or to
the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at the NARA, call
(202) 741-6030, or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/
code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
Effective Date
(j) This amendment becomes effective on January 11, 2007.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 20, 2006.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E6-20620 Filed 12-6-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P