Pesticides; Food Packaging Treated with a Pesticide, 70667-70670 [E6-20270]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
in place of an operating permit program
submission that otherwise satisfies the
provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus,
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct. The EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR
8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in
accordance with the ‘‘Attorney
General’s Supplemental Guidelines for
the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the
Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 5, 2007.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action fully
approving Delaware’s Title V operating
permit program may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
This action approves an amendment
to the Delaware Title V operating permit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 Dec 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
program to correct the definition of a
‘‘major source.’’
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 21, 2006.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
I
40 CFR part 70 is amended as follows:
PART 70—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Appendix A to part 70 is amended
by adding paragraph (c) in the entry for
Delaware to read as follows:
I
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval
Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
*
*
*
*
*
Delaware
(c) The Delaware Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental Control
submitted program amendment on May 18,
2004. This rule amendment contained in the
May 18, 2004 submittal is necessary to make
the current definition as stringent as the
corresponding provision of 40 CFR part 70,
which went into effect on November 27,
2001. The State is hereby granted approval
effective on February 5, 2007.
[FR Doc. E6–20645 Filed 12–5–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0175; FRL–8084–2]
Pesticides; Food Packaging Treated
with a Pesticide
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule excepts from the
definitions of ‘‘pesticide chemical’’ and
‘‘pesticide chemical residue’’ under
FFDCA section 201(q), food packaging
(e.g. paper and paperboard, coatings,
adhesives, and polymers) that is treated
with a pesticide as defined in the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) section 2(u).
As a result, such ingredients in food
packaging treated with a pesticide are
exempt from regulation under FFDCA
section 408 as pesticide chemical
residues. Further, a food that bears or
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70667
contains such ingredients are not
subject to enforcement by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) under
section 402(a)(2) (B) of the FFDCA since
the ingredients are not pesticide
chemical residues. Instead, such
ingredients are subject to regulation by
the FDA as food additives under FFDCA
section 409. FDA generally regulates
such food additives in food packaging as
food contact substances under FFDCA,
section 409(h). This rule expands the
scope of the provision in 40 CFR 180.4
which currently applies only to food
packaging impregnated with an insect
repellent - one type of pesticide. This
rule, as with the rule it amends, only
applies to the food packaging materials
themselves; it does not otherwise limit
EPA’s FFDCA jurisdiction over
pesticides or limit FDA’s jurisdiction
over substances subject to FDA
regulation as food additives. EPA, in
consultation with FDA, believes this
rule will eliminate the duplicative
FFDCA jurisdiction and economize
Federal government resources while
continuing to protect human health and
the environment. Under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA), EPA still regulates the food
packaging as an inert ingredient of the
pesticide product and still regulates the
pesticide active ingredient in the treated
food packaging under both FIFRA and
the FFDCA.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
February 5, 2007 without further notice
unless EPA receives adverse comments
in writing. Any comments must be
received on or before January 5, 2007. If
EPA receives adverse comments, EPA
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0175, by
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
70668
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–
0175. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the docket
without change and may be made
available on-line at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through regulations.gov or email. The Federal regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the docket
and made available on the Internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the docket index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the
electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400,
One Potomac Yard (South Building),
2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA.
The hours of operation of this Docket
Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mari
L. Duggard, Biopesticides and Pollution
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 Dec 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
Prevention Division (7511P), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (703) 308–
0028; fax number: (703) 308–7026; email address: duggard.mari@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are a manufacturer/
wholesaler of sanitary food packaging
products or are a pesticide
manufacturer. Potentially affected
entities may include, but are not limited
to:
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
32532)
• Food packaging manufacturers
(NAICS 32222)
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions in
40 CFR 180.4. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare
My Comments for EPA?
1. Docket. EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0175.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket
at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the Office of
Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory
Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive Arlington, VA. The hours
of operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
2. Tips for preparing your comments.
When submitting comments, remember
to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID
number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal
Register date, and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may
ask you to respond to specific questions
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
or organize comments by referencing a
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;
suggest alternatives and substitute
language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and
provide any technical information and/
or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or
burdens, explain how you arrived at
your estimate in sufficient detail to
allow for it to be reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to
illustrate your concerns and suggest
alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as
possible, avoiding the use of profanity
or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your
comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA has received applications for the
registration of pesticides under FIFRA
that, as proposed, will be applied to
food packaging materials. These
pesticides are generally intended to
function as alternatives to more costly
and more toxic applications of
insecticides in food storage and retail
establishments. The regulatory
framework for this use of pesticides
raises a number of complex
jurisdictional issues for EPA and FDA.1
Because the treated packaging materials
will be sold to food distributors for the
purpose of controlling pest infestations,
as well as for packaging food, the
pesticide treated food packaging
materials will be subject to the pesticide
product registration requirements of
section 3 of FIFRA. Under FIFRA, the
components of pesticides are either
active ingredients or inert ingredients.
Active ingredients are those which,
among other things, will ‘‘prevent,
destroy, repel or mitigate any pest.’’
(FIFRA section 2(a)) Inert ingredients
are ingredients ‘‘which are not active.’’
(FIFRA section 2(m)). Thus, the
components of the food packaging
(paperboards, coatings, etc.) become
inert ingredients of a pesticide product
1This rule does not include within its scope
substances which may be regulated as pesticides
under FIFRA that are used to prevent, destroy, repel
or mitigate microorganisms when such substances
are included for such use in or are applied for such
use on food packaging (without regard to whether
the substances are intended to have an ongoing
effect on any portion of the packaging) (see FFDCA
section 201(q)(1)(B)(ii) which excludes such
substances from the definition of ‘‘pesticide
chemical’’). Because such substances are already
excluded from the definition of pesticide chemical
residue, it is unnecessary to address these
substances in this rule.
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
under FIFRA whenever the food
packaging is treated with a pesticide
active ingredient and is distributed or
sold with the purpose of controlling
pests.2 Such inert ingredients are not
used for a pesticidal purpose in the
production, storage, processing, or
transportation of food. However, as inert
ingredients, these components of food
packaging are also subject to regulation
as ‘‘pesticide chemical residues’’ under
FFDCA section 408.
Under section 408 of the FFDCA, any
pesticide chemical residue in or on food
is deemed unsafe, unless EPA has
established a tolerance or tolerance
exemption that covers the pesticide
chemical residue. This is true even
though FDA may have previously issued
regulations under section 409 of FFDCA
permitting the use of these materials in
food packaging that has not been treated
with a pesticide. As a result, the same
food packaging materials would be
subject to regulation under FFDCA by
both Agencies. EPA is taking today’s
action in order to give FDA jurisdiction
under the FFDCA over the inert
ingredients in food packaging treated
with a pesticide as food additives.
Consequently, EPA would no longer
have jurisdiction over such substances
as pesticide chemicals under the FFDCA
since a pesticide chemical and a
pesticide chemical residue are excluded
from the definition of food additive in
FFDCA section 201(s). Given FDA’s
expertise and experience in regulating
the components of food packaging, EPA,
in consultation with FDA, believes this
rule will eliminate the duplicative
FFDCA jurisdiction and economize
Federal government resources while
continuing to protect human health and
the environment without additional
regulatory oversight by EPA.
In 1998, EPA consciously limited the
exception at 40 CFR 180.4 to food
packaging materials impregnated with
an insect repellent, since at the time of
promulgation EPA had only received an
application for a pesticide product
containing an insect repellent. EPA has
2It is important to understand that this rule only
applies to a very small subset of food packaging
materials: pesticide-treated food packaging that is
distributed or sold with the purpose of controlling
pests. Food packaging that is not distributed or sold
to control pests is not a pesticide and is not subject
to this rule. For example, packaged products that
are simply treated with pesticides by food
distributors, retailers or homeowners solely to
control pests on site do not themselves become
pesticides simply as a result of such applications.
Rather, the product itself must be distributed with
the purpose of providing pest control to become a
pesticide. The treated packaging materials
addressed in this rule are those that are sold for the
express purpose of providing ongoing protection
from pests that may contaminate the products made
with the treated packaging.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 Dec 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
now received applications for other
treated food packaging products that
contain active ingredients that are not
insect repellents and will not be applied
through impregnation of the materials.
EPA, in consultation with FDA, believes
it is appropriate to extend the 1998 rule
to give FDA sole jurisdiction under the
FFDCA over the inert ingredients in
such food packaging products without
regard to the application technique and
mode of action of the active ingredients
in such products. Again, this action
does not affect EPA’s jurisdiction under
section 408 over ingredients other than
the packaging materials in such
products (including the pesticide active
ingredient), nor does it affect EPA’s
jurisdiction under FIFRA to regulate
such products.
B. What Is the Agency’s Authority for
Taking This Action?
Section 201(q)(3) of FFDCA, as
amended by the Food Quality Protection
Act (FQPA), allows the Administrator,
under specified conditions, to except
certain substances from the definition of
‘‘pesticide chemical’’ or ‘‘pesticide
chemical residue’’ if:
A. Its occurrence as a residue on or in
a raw agricultural commodity or
processed food is attributable primarily
to natural causes or human activities not
involving the use of any substance for
a pesticidal purpose in the production,
storage, processing, or transportation of
any raw agricultural commodity or
processed food, and:
B. The Administrator, after
consultation with the Secretary,
determines that the substance more
appropriately should be regulated under
one or more provisions of this Act other
than sections 402(a)(2)(B) and 408.
With today’s rule, EPA is excepting
from the definition of ‘‘pesticide
chemical’’ substances that are inert
ingredients in food packaging treated
with a pesticide, when such ingredients
are the components of the food
packaging (e.g. paper and paperboard,
coatings, adhesives and polymers).
It is important to note that this rule
does not affect EPA’s regulation of such
substances as inert ingredients under
FIFRA. EPA will continue to exercise
jurisdiction over these substances when
they are used as inert ingredients in
food packaging material that is intended
to produce a pesticidal effect. The
materials that make up food packaging
treated with a pesticide may serve one
of two purposes: 1. To control pests, or
2. to be one of the materials that make
up the container for food. As a result of
this rule, under FFDCA, EPA will
continue to regulate the materials which
control pests and FDA will regulate the
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70669
materials that make up the food
packaging material. Consistent with
EPA’s pesticide registration regulations,
EPA will not issue a registration under
FIFRA for pesticide products containing
food packaging inert ingredients if the
presence of these ingredients in or on
food is not authorized or permitted by
FFDCA and the implementing
regulations.
EPA, in consultation with FDA,
believes that section 201(q)(3) is
applicable to inert ingredients in
pesticide treated food packaging
materials that are the components of the
food packaging (paperboard, coatings,
etc). When such inert ingredients are the
components of the food packaging itself,
EPA believes the occurrence of these
substances as residues in or on food
would be appropriately excepted from
the definition of ‘‘pesticide chemical’’ or
‘‘pesticide chemical residue’’ because
such substances are not attributable
primarily to the use of the substances
for a pesticidal purpose in the
production, storage, processing or
transportation of food. Rather, the
presence of such substances as residues
in food is primarily attributable to their
use for purposes of packaging food. For
this reason, and because of FDA’s
considerable experience in regulating
such substances found in food
packaging, EPA, after consulting with
FDA, believes it is appropriate for FDA
to regulate these inert ingredients under
section 409 of FFDCA.
As noted, this regulation excepts from
the definition of ‘‘pesticide chemical’’
and ‘‘pesticide chemical residue’’ any
inert ingredient that is a component of
food packaging material treated with a
pesticide. EPA, in consultation with
FDA, believes the identity of the
pesticide in or on the packaging
material is not relevant to a
determination under section 201(q)(3)
regarding whether it is appropriate to
except an inert ingredient from the
definition of pesticide chemical or
pesticide chemical residue. As noted
above, that determination turns only on
whether: 1. the occurrence of the
residues of the substance in or on food
is attributable primarily to the use of
substances for a pesticidal purpose in
the production, storage, processing or
transportation of food; and 2. whether it
is more appropriate to regulate such
substances under another provision of
FFDCA other than sections 402(a)(2)(B)
and 408. Thus, EPA has determined that
inert ingredients that are the
components of the food packaging
material in pesticide treated food
packaging are more appropriately
regulated by FDA under FFDCA. This
rule therefore amends 40 CFR 180.4 to
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
70670
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 234 / Wednesday, December 6, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES
extend to any food packaging materials
treated with a pesticide.
EPA is issuing this action as a direct
final rule without prior proposal
because the Agency believes that this
action is not controversial and will not
result in any adverse comments. EPA
previously received no adverse
comments when it issued the current
rule at 40 CFR 180.4 to except food
packaging materials impregnated with
insect repellents from EPA jurisdiction
under section 408. Because this
amendment to § 180.4 likewise only
applies to the food packaging materials,
and not to the pesticide active
ingredient used in such products, EPA
believes this action is similarly noncontroversial The Agency also believes
that it is important to make this action
effective as soon as possible, 1. in order
to address the current, unnecessary
overlap in jurisdiction between EPA and
FDA under FFDCA; and 2. to allow the
Agency to act expeditiously on pending
applications for registration by
eliminating the need for developing
numerous individual tolerance
exemptions for the components of the
packaging material. If no relevant
adverse comment is submitted within
30 days of publication, this action will
become effective 60 days after
publication without any further action
by the Agency. If, however, a relevant
adverse comment is received during the
comment period, this final rule will be
withdrawn and the public comments
received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule, or EPA may
request additional public comments.
For the reasons set forth above, EPA
believes that it is appropriate to issue
this rule as direct final rule. In addition,
this rule also conforms with the ‘‘good
cause’’ exemption under section
553(b)(B) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)),
which allows agencies to issue an action
without additional notice and comment
if further notice and comment would be
unnecessary.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
As an exception, this action does not
impose any regulatory obligations.
Under Executive Order 12866 entitled
Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), it has been
determined that this rule is not
‘‘significant’’ and is not subject to OMB
review. This rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et.
Seq., or impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:34 Dec 05, 2006
Jkt 211001
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Pub. L. 104–4). This rule has no
federalism or tribal implications,
because it will not have substantial
direct effects on States or Indian tribes,
on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States or Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various
levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified in Executive Orders 13132
(entitled Federalism, 64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and 13175 (entitled
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, 65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000. Nor does this
rule raise issues that require special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994), or require OMB review in
accordance with Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This rule is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect energy Supply,
Distribution or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because this action is not
expected to affect energy supply,
distribution, or use. In addition, this
action does not involve any standards
that would require Agency
consideration pursuant to section 12(d)
of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA) (Pub. L.
104–113).
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the Agency hereby
certifies that this regulatory action will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities, because this regulatory action is
an exemption and imposes no
regulatory obligations. EPA will provide
this information to the Small Business
Administration’s office of Advocacy
upon request.
IV. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
Agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and the Comptroller General of
the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This rule is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and record-keeping
requirements.
Dated: November 14, 2006.
Janet L. Andersen,
Division Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a), and
371
2. Section 180.4 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
I
§ 180.4
Exceptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) General. Inert ingredients in food
packaging treated with a pesticide,
when such inert ingredients are the
components of the food packaging
material (e.g. paper and paperboard,
coatings, adhesives, and polymers).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–20270 Filed 12–05–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0664; FRL–8100–3]
Paraquat Dichloride; Pesticide
Tolerance Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; Correction.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA issued a final rule in the
Federal Register of September 6, 2006,
concerning establishing tolerances for
residues of paraquat dichloride in or on
various food and feed commodities.
This document is being issued to correct
typographical errors.
DATES: This final rule is effective
December 6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0664. All documents in the
docket are listed on the regulations.gov
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 6, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70667-70670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20270]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0175; FRL-8084-2]
Pesticides; Food Packaging Treated with a Pesticide
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule excepts from the definitions of ``pesticide
chemical'' and ``pesticide chemical residue'' under FFDCA section
201(q), food packaging (e.g. paper and paperboard, coatings, adhesives,
and polymers) that is treated with a pesticide as defined in the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) section
2(u). As a result, such ingredients in food packaging treated with a
pesticide are exempt from regulation under FFDCA section 408 as
pesticide chemical residues. Further, a food that bears or contains
such ingredients are not subject to enforcement by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) under section 402(a)(2) (B) of the FFDCA since the
ingredients are not pesticide chemical residues. Instead, such
ingredients are subject to regulation by the FDA as food additives
under FFDCA section 409. FDA generally regulates such food additives in
food packaging as food contact substances under FFDCA, section 409(h).
This rule expands the scope of the provision in 40 CFR 180.4 which
currently applies only to food packaging impregnated with an insect
repellent - one type of pesticide. This rule, as with the rule it
amends, only applies to the food packaging materials themselves; it
does not otherwise limit EPA's FFDCA jurisdiction over pesticides or
limit FDA's jurisdiction over substances subject to FDA regulation as
food additives. EPA, in consultation with FDA, believes this rule will
eliminate the duplicative FFDCA jurisdiction and economize Federal
government resources while continuing to protect human health and the
environment. Under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA), EPA still regulates the food packaging as an inert
ingredient of the pesticide product and still regulates the pesticide
active ingredient in the treated food packaging under both FIFRA and
the FFDCA.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective February 5, 2007 without
further notice unless EPA receives adverse comments in writing. Any
comments must be received on or before January 5, 2007. If EPA receives
adverse comments, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0175, by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
[[Page 70668]]
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2006-0175. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index.
Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. The hours of operation
of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number is (703)
305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mari L. Duggard, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (703) 308-0028; fax
number: (703) 308-7026; e-mail address: duggard.mari@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are a
manufacturer/wholesaler of sanitary food packaging products or are a
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but
are not limited to:
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532)
Food packaging manufacturers (NAICS 32222)
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions in 40 CFR 180.4. If you
have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0175. Publicly available docket
materials are available either in the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard copy, at the Office
of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date, and page number).
ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.
II. Background
A. What Action is the Agency Taking?
EPA has received applications for the registration of pesticides
under FIFRA that, as proposed, will be applied to food packaging
materials. These pesticides are generally intended to function as
alternatives to more costly and more toxic applications of insecticides
in food storage and retail establishments. The regulatory framework for
this use of pesticides raises a number of complex jurisdictional issues
for EPA and FDA.\1\ Because the treated packaging materials will be
sold to food distributors for the purpose of controlling pest
infestations, as well as for packaging food, the pesticide treated food
packaging materials will be subject to the pesticide product
registration requirements of section 3 of FIFRA. Under FIFRA, the
components of pesticides are either active ingredients or inert
ingredients. Active ingredients are those which, among other things,
will ``prevent, destroy, repel or mitigate any pest.'' (FIFRA section
2(a)) Inert ingredients are ingredients ``which are not active.''
(FIFRA section 2(m)). Thus, the components of the food packaging
(paperboards, coatings, etc.) become inert ingredients of a pesticide
product
[[Page 70669]]
under FIFRA whenever the food packaging is treated with a pesticide
active ingredient and is distributed or sold with the purpose of
controlling pests.\2\ Such inert ingredients are not used for a
pesticidal purpose in the production, storage, processing, or
transportation of food. However, as inert ingredients, these components
of food packaging are also subject to regulation as ``pesticide
chemical residues'' under FFDCA section 408.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\This rule does not include within its scope substances which
may be regulated as pesticides under FIFRA that are used to prevent,
destroy, repel or mitigate microorganisms when such substances are
included for such use in or are applied for such use on food
packaging (without regard to whether the substances are intended to
have an ongoing effect on any portion of the packaging) (see FFDCA
section 201(q)(1)(B)(ii) which excludes such substances from the
definition of ``pesticide chemical''). Because such substances are
already excluded from the definition of pesticide chemical residue,
it is unnecessary to address these substances in this rule.
\2\It is important to understand that this rule only applies to
a very small subset of food packaging materials: pesticide-treated
food packaging that is distributed or sold with the purpose of
controlling pests. Food packaging that is not distributed or sold to
control pests is not a pesticide and is not subject to this rule.
For example, packaged products that are simply treated with
pesticides by food distributors, retailers or homeowners solely to
control pests on site do not themselves become pesticides simply as
a result of such applications. Rather, the product itself must be
distributed with the purpose of providing pest control to become a
pesticide. The treated packaging materials addressed in this rule
are those that are sold for the express purpose of providing ongoing
protection from pests that may contaminate the products made with
the treated packaging.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under section 408 of the FFDCA, any pesticide chemical residue in
or on food is deemed unsafe, unless EPA has established a tolerance or
tolerance exemption that covers the pesticide chemical residue. This is
true even though FDA may have previously issued regulations under
section 409 of FFDCA permitting the use of these materials in food
packaging that has not been treated with a pesticide. As a result, the
same food packaging materials would be subject to regulation under
FFDCA by both Agencies. EPA is taking today's action in order to give
FDA jurisdiction under the FFDCA over the inert ingredients in food
packaging treated with a pesticide as food additives. Consequently, EPA
would no longer have jurisdiction over such substances as pesticide
chemicals under the FFDCA since a pesticide chemical and a pesticide
chemical residue are excluded from the definition of food additive in
FFDCA section 201(s). Given FDA's expertise and experience in
regulating the components of food packaging, EPA, in consultation with
FDA, believes this rule will eliminate the duplicative FFDCA
jurisdiction and economize Federal government resources while
continuing to protect human health and the environment without
additional regulatory oversight by EPA.
In 1998, EPA consciously limited the exception at 40 CFR 180.4 to
food packaging materials impregnated with an insect repellent, since at
the time of promulgation EPA had only received an application for a
pesticide product containing an insect repellent. EPA has now received
applications for other treated food packaging products that contain
active ingredients that are not insect repellents and will not be
applied through impregnation of the materials. EPA, in consultation
with FDA, believes it is appropriate to extend the 1998 rule to give
FDA sole jurisdiction under the FFDCA over the inert ingredients in
such food packaging products without regard to the application
technique and mode of action of the active ingredients in such
products. Again, this action does not affect EPA's jurisdiction under
section 408 over ingredients other than the packaging materials in such
products (including the pesticide active ingredient), nor does it
affect EPA's jurisdiction under FIFRA to regulate such products.
B. What Is the Agency's Authority for Taking This Action?
Section 201(q)(3) of FFDCA, as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act (FQPA), allows the Administrator, under specified
conditions, to except certain substances from the definition of
``pesticide chemical'' or ``pesticide chemical residue'' if:
A. Its occurrence as a residue on or in a raw agricultural
commodity or processed food is attributable primarily to natural causes
or human activities not involving the use of any substance for a
pesticidal purpose in the production, storage, processing, or
transportation of any raw agricultural commodity or processed food,
and:
B. The Administrator, after consultation with the Secretary,
determines that the substance more appropriately should be regulated
under one or more provisions of this Act other than sections
402(a)(2)(B) and 408.
With today's rule, EPA is excepting from the definition of
``pesticide chemical'' substances that are inert ingredients in food
packaging treated with a pesticide, when such ingredients are the
components of the food packaging (e.g. paper and paperboard, coatings,
adhesives and polymers).
It is important to note that this rule does not affect EPA's
regulation of such substances as inert ingredients under FIFRA. EPA
will continue to exercise jurisdiction over these substances when they
are used as inert ingredients in food packaging material that is
intended to produce a pesticidal effect. The materials that make up
food packaging treated with a pesticide may serve one of two purposes:
1. To control pests, or 2. to be one of the materials that make up the
container for food. As a result of this rule, under FFDCA, EPA will
continue to regulate the materials which control pests and FDA will
regulate the materials that make up the food packaging material.
Consistent with EPA's pesticide registration regulations, EPA will not
issue a registration under FIFRA for pesticide products containing food
packaging inert ingredients if the presence of these ingredients in or
on food is not authorized or permitted by FFDCA and the implementing
regulations.
EPA, in consultation with FDA, believes that section 201(q)(3) is
applicable to inert ingredients in pesticide treated food packaging
materials that are the components of the food packaging (paperboard,
coatings, etc). When such inert ingredients are the components of the
food packaging itself, EPA believes the occurrence of these substances
as residues in or on food would be appropriately excepted from the
definition of ``pesticide chemical'' or ``pesticide chemical residue''
because such substances are not attributable primarily to the use of
the substances for a pesticidal purpose in the production, storage,
processing or transportation of food. Rather, the presence of such
substances as residues in food is primarily attributable to their use
for purposes of packaging food. For this reason, and because of FDA's
considerable experience in regulating such substances found in food
packaging, EPA, after consulting with FDA, believes it is appropriate
for FDA to regulate these inert ingredients under section 409 of FFDCA.
As noted, this regulation excepts from the definition of
``pesticide chemical'' and ``pesticide chemical residue'' any inert
ingredient that is a component of food packaging material treated with
a pesticide. EPA, in consultation with FDA, believes the identity of
the pesticide in or on the packaging material is not relevant to a
determination under section 201(q)(3) regarding whether it is
appropriate to except an inert ingredient from the definition of
pesticide chemical or pesticide chemical residue. As noted above, that
determination turns only on whether: 1. the occurrence of the residues
of the substance in or on food is attributable primarily to the use of
substances for a pesticidal purpose in the production, storage,
processing or transportation of food; and 2. whether it is more
appropriate to regulate such substances under another provision of
FFDCA other than sections 402(a)(2)(B) and 408. Thus, EPA has
determined that inert ingredients that are the components of the food
packaging material in pesticide treated food packaging are more
appropriately regulated by FDA under FFDCA. This rule therefore amends
40 CFR 180.4 to
[[Page 70670]]
extend to any food packaging materials treated with a pesticide.
EPA is issuing this action as a direct final rule without prior
proposal because the Agency believes that this action is not
controversial and will not result in any adverse comments. EPA
previously received no adverse comments when it issued the current rule
at 40 CFR 180.4 to except food packaging materials impregnated with
insect repellents from EPA jurisdiction under section 408. Because this
amendment to Sec. 180.4 likewise only applies to the food packaging
materials, and not to the pesticide active ingredient used in such
products, EPA believes this action is similarly non-controversial The
Agency also believes that it is important to make this action effective
as soon as possible, 1. in order to address the current, unnecessary
overlap in jurisdiction between EPA and FDA under FFDCA; and 2. to
allow the Agency to act expeditiously on pending applications for
registration by eliminating the need for developing numerous individual
tolerance exemptions for the components of the packaging material. If
no relevant adverse comment is submitted within 30 days of publication,
this action will become effective 60 days after publication without any
further action by the Agency. If, however, a relevant adverse comment
is received during the comment period, this final rule will be
withdrawn and the public comments received will be addressed in a
subsequent final rule, or EPA may request additional public comments.
For the reasons set forth above, EPA believes that it is
appropriate to issue this rule as direct final rule. In addition, this
rule also conforms with the ``good cause'' exemption under section
553(b)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)),
which allows agencies to issue an action without additional notice and
comment if further notice and comment would be unnecessary.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
As an exception, this action does not impose any regulatory
obligations. Under Executive Order 12866 entitled Regulatory Planning
and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), it has been determined that
this rule is not ``significant'' and is not subject to OMB review. This
rule does not contain any information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et.
Seq., or impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule has no federalism or tribal
implications, because it will not have substantial direct effects on
States or Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the States or Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in
Executive Orders 13132 (entitled Federalism, 64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and 13175 (entitled Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments, 65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000. Nor does this rule
raise issues that require special considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994), or require OMB review in accordance with Executive Order
13045, entitled Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks
and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This rule is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect energy Supply, Distribution or
Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because this action is not expected to
affect energy supply, distribution, or use. In addition, this action
does not involve any standards that would require Agency consideration
pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA) (Pub. L. 104-113).
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the
Agency hereby certifies that this regulatory action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
because this regulatory action is an exemption and imposes no
regulatory obligations. EPA will provide this information to the Small
Business Administration's office of Advocacy upon request.
IV. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the Agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and the Comptroller General of the United
States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and record-
keeping requirements.
Dated: November 14, 2006.
Janet L. Andersen,
Division Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346(a), and 371
0
2. Section 180.4 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 180.4 Exceptions.
* * * * *
(a) General. Inert ingredients in food packaging treated with a
pesticide, when such inert ingredients are the components of the food
packaging material (e.g. paper and paperboard, coatings, adhesives, and
polymers).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-20270 Filed 12-05-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S