Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating Permits Program; State of Missouri, 70468-70471 [E6-20446]
Download as PDF
70468
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
0.5 (GIWW mile 6.2 East of Harvey
Lock), to remain closed to navigation
from 6:30 a.m. until 5:45 p.m. on
Tuesday, December 5, 2006.
The bascule bridge has a vertical
clearance of 1 foot above high water in
the closed-to-navigation position.
Navigation on the waterway consists
mainly of tugs with tows and some
ships. The bridge normally opens to
pass navigation an average of eight
times during the deviation period. In
accordance with 33 CFR 117.458(a), the
draw of the bridge shall open on signal;
except that, from 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
and from 3:30 p.m. to 5:45 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays, the draw need not open for the
passage of vessels. The draw shall open
at any time for a vessel in distress.
Normally, the draw is required to open
at any time for a vessel in distress.
However, the bridge will not be able to
open for emergencies during the closure
period. An alternate route is available to
mariners by proceeding down the
Mississippi River to Venice, Louisiana,
crossing the Breton Sound and
proceeding up the Mississippi River
Gulf Outlet.
The Coast Guard has coordinated the
closure with waterway users, industry,
and other Coast Guard units. It has been
determined that this closure will not
have a significant effect on vessel traffic.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c),
this work will be performed with all due
speed in order to return the bridge to
normal operation as soon as possible.
This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
Dated: November 13, 2006.
Marcus Redford,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–20485 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD08–06–041]
Drawbridge Operating Regulations;
Berwick Bay, (Atchafalaya River)
Morgan City, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Eighth
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:17 Dec 04, 2006
Jkt 211001
governing the operation of the BNSF
Railway Company Vertical Lift Span
Bridge across Berwick Bay, mile 0.4,
(Atchafalaya River, mile 17.5) at Morgan
City, St. Mary Parish, Louisiana. This
deviation provides for the bridge to
remain closed to navigation for 12
consecutive hours to conduct scheduled
maintenance to the drawbridge.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
8 a.m. until 8 p.m. on Wednesday,
December 13, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this
document are available for inspection or
copying at the office of the Eighth Coast
Guard District, Bridge Administration
Branch, Hale Boggs Federal Building,
Room 1313, 500 Poydras Street, New
Orleans, Louisiana 70130–3310 between
7 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The
telephone number is (504) 671–2128.
The Bridge Administration Branch
maintains the public docket for this
temporary deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Frank, Bridge Administration
Branch, telephone (504) 671–2128
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BNSF
Railway Company has requested a
temporary deviation in order to replace
the railroad signal circuits of the BNSF
Railway Railroad Vertical Lift Span
Bridge across Berwick Bay, mile 0.4
(Atchafalaya River, mile 17.5) at Morgan
City, St. Mary Parish, Louisiana.
Replacement of the signal circuits is
necessary to turn the lining of signals
across the bridge into a fully automatic
operation so that the bridge will be in
full compliance with requirements of
the Federal Railroad Administration.
This temporary deviation will allow the
bridge to remain in the closed-tonavigation position from 8 a.m. until 8
p.m. on Wednesday, December 13, 2006.
There may be times, during the closure
period, when the draw will not be able
to open for emergencies.
The bridge provides 4 feet of vertical
clearance in the closed-to-navigation
position. Thus, most vessels will not be
able to transit through the bridge site
when the bridge is closed. Navigation
on the waterway consists of tugs with
tows, fishing vessels and recreational
craft including sailboats and
powerboats. Due to prior experience, as
well as coordination with waterway
users, it has been determined that this
closure will not have a significant effect
on these vessels.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c),
this work will be performed with all due
speed in order to return the bridge to
normal operation as soon as possible.
This deviation from the operating
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
Dated: November 16, 2006.
Marcus Redford,
Bridge Administrator.
[FR Doc. E6–20486 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA–R07–OAR–2006–0900; FRL–8250–7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans and Operating
Permits Program; State of Missouri
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) and
operating permits program revision
submitted by the state of Missouri to
update the ambient air quality
standards, sampling methods,
definitions, and common reference
methods and tables. The update also
includes references to implement the 8hour ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient
Air Quality Standards that were
finalized on July 18, 1997.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective February 5, 2007, without
further notice, unless EPA receives
adverse comment by January 4, 2007. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register
informing the public that the rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2006–0900, by one of the
following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Amy Algoe-Eakin,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver
your comments to Amy Algoe-Eakin,
Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901
North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas
66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2006–
0900. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The https://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Environmental Protection Agency,
Air Planning and Development Branch,
901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays. The
interested persons wanting to examine
these documents should make an
appointment with the office at least 24
hours in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Algoe-Eakin at (913) 551–7942, or
by e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:17 Dec 04, 2006
Jkt 211001
EPA. This section provides additional
information by addressing the following
questions:
What is a SIP?
What is the Federal approval process for a
SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state
regulation mean to me?
What is the Part 70 operating permit program
and approval process?
What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP
revision and operating permit program
revision been met?
What action is EPA taking?
What is a SIP?
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA) requires states to develop air
pollution regulations and control
strategies to ensure that state air quality
meets the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) established by EPA.
These ambient standards are established
under section 109 of the CAA, and they
currently address six criteria pollutants.
These pollutants are: Carbon monoxide,
nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead,
particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
Each state must submit these
regulations and control strategies to us
for approval and incorporation into the
Federally-enforceable SIP.
Each Federally-approved SIP protects
air quality primarily by addressing air
pollution at its point of origin. These
SIPs can be extensive, containing state
regulations or other enforceable
documents and supporting information
such as emission inventories,
monitoring networks, and modeling
demonstrations.
What is the Federal approval process
for a SIP?
In order for state regulations to be
incorporated into the Federallyenforceable SIP, states must formally
adopt the regulations and control
strategies consistent with state and
Federal requirements. This process
generally includes a public notice,
public hearing, public comment period,
and a formal adoption by a stateauthorized rulemaking body.
Once a state rule, regulation, or
control strategy is adopted, the state
submits it to us for inclusion into the
SIP. We must provide public notice and
seek additional public comment
regarding the proposed Federal action
on the state submission. If adverse
comments are received, they must be
addressed prior to any final Federal
action by us.
All state regulations and supporting
information approved by EPA under
section 110 of the CAA are incorporated
into the Federally-approved SIP.
Records of such SIP actions are
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
70469
maintained in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) at title 40, part 52,
entitled ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans.’’ The actual state
regulations which are approved are not
reproduced in their entirety in the CFR
outright but are ‘‘incorporated by
reference,’’ which means that we have
approved a given state regulation with
a specific effective date.
What does Federal approval of a state
regulation mean to me?
Enforcement of the state regulation
before and after it is incorporated into
the Federally-approved SIP is primarily
a state responsibility. However, after the
regulation is Federally approved, we are
authorized to take enforcement action
against violators. Citizens are also
offered legal recourse to address
violations as described in section 304 of
the CAA.
What is the Part 70 operating permits
program and approval process?
The CAA requires all states to develop
operating permits programs that meet
certain Federal criteria. The purpose of
the program is to consolidate all
applicable CAA requirements into a
single permit document issued to a
source subject to the permit program.
The process for EPA approval of a Part
70 program or program revision is
similar to the process for approval of a
SIP. Permits issued under an EPAapproved permit program are
enforceable by EPA and the state.
What is being addressed in this
document?
EPA is approving a revision to the SIP
and Part 70 permits program for the
state of Missouri that was state effective
on February 28, 2006. The revisions
include the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5
NAAQS that were finalized by EPA on
July 18, 1997.
The revision to 10 CSR 10–6.010
(Ambient Air Quality Standards)
updates the ambient air quality
standards table to include the Federal
revision to the NAAQS, and reformatted
the columns for clarity. It should be
noted that, unlike many other
requirements in the Missouri SIP, the
NAAQS are not requirements imposed
directly on sources under the CAA
(although states may impose such
requirements directly on sources under
state law). Sources must comply with
emissions limitations and standards
under the CAA and the SIP, but the
NAAQS are not emissions limitations
and standards under the CAA. However,
because the Missouri rules establish
other requirements, applicable to
sources, designed to protect the NAAQS
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
70470
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
(e.g., the requirement that a source may
not obtain certain permits if it would
cause or contribute to a violation of the
NAAQS), EPA has included Missouri’s
adoption of the NAAQS in the SIP to
assist in implementation of the NAAQS.
Chapter 10 CSR 10–6.020 (Definitions
and Common Reference Tables) revises
the definitions for insignificant activity,
particulate matter, and adds definitions
for PM2.5. Five compounds were added
to the volatile organic compounds
definition and minor changes were
made to the table listing hazardous air
pollutants (table 3), and the related
footnotes. In order to maintain
formatting consistent with other rules,
the state added sections (4) and (5) to
state that reporting and record keeping,
and test methods are not applicable to
10 CSR 10–6.020. It should be noted
that revisions made to 10 CSR 10–6.020,
and specifically the clarification of the
definition of ‘‘insignificant activity’’
also apply to Missouri’s operating
permits program.
The revisions to 10 CSR 10–6.030
(Sampling Methods for Air Pollution
sources) add EPA’s Conditional Test
Method 039 to determine the total PM10
and PM2.5 fraction of filterable
particulate matter including
condensibles. Two paragraphs that
discussed PM2.5 emissions in stack gases
were combined for clarity and
readability.
Revisions to 10 CSR 10–6.040
(Reference Methods) add references to
appendices included in the Federal
regulations that specify test methods for
PM2.5.
Minor revisions to each of the rules
were made to correct spelling, to
include the most recent date of the
Federal regulations, and to improve the
overall readability.
Have the requirements for approval of
a SIP revision and operating permit
program revision been met?
The state submittal has met the public
notice requirements for SIP submissions
in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The
submittal also satisfied the
completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51,
appendix V. In addition, as explained
above and in more detail in the
technical support document which is
part of this docket, the revision meets
the substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA. Finally, the submittal meets the
substantive requirements of Title V of
the 1990 CAA Amendments and 40 CFR
Part 70.
What action is EPA taking?
EPA is a approving a revision to the
SIP for the state of Missouri to update
the ambient air quality standards,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:17 Dec 04, 2006
Jkt 211001
sampling methods, definitions, and
common reference methods and tables
to include the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5
NAAQS that were finalized on July 18,
1997. EPA is also approving the
revisions to the state’s definitions rule
as a revision to the Part 70 operating
program. We are processing this action
as a direct final action because the
revisions make routine changes to the
existing SIP which are noncontroversial.
Therefore, we do not anticipate any
adverse comments. Please note that if
EPA receives adverse comment on part
of this rule and if that part can be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
EPA may adopt as final those parts of
the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
CAA. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
In reviewing state submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a state submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a state
submission, to use VCS in place of a
state submission that otherwise satisfies
the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by February 5, 2007.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
70471
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 233 / Tuesday, December 5, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
permits, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Subpart AA—Missouri
Dated: November 21, 2006.
John B. Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
2. In § 52.1320(c) the table is amended
under Chapter 6 by revising the entries
for ‘‘10–6.010, 10–6.020, 10–6.030 and
10–6.040’’ to read as follows:
I
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
§ 52.1320
PART 52—[AMENDED]
*
I
40 CFR Part 70
Administrative practice and
procedure, Air pollution control,
Intergovernmental relations, Operating
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Identification of Plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
Missouri citation
State
effective
date
Title
EPA
approval
date
Explanation
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri
*
*
*
*
10–6.010 ............................... Ambient Air Quality Standards .............................
*
2/28/06
10–6.020 ...............................
Definitions and Common Reference Tables ........
2/28/06
10–6.030 ...............................
Sampling Methods for Air Pollution Sources .......
2/28/06
10–6.040 ...............................
Reference Methods ..............................................
2/28/06
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. Appendix A to part 70 is amended
by adding paragraph (s) to read as
follows:
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval
Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
*
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00015
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
Missouri
I
I
14:17 Dec 04, 2006
*
Appendix A—[Amended]
PART 70—[AMENDED]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
12/5/06 [insert FR
page number where
the document begins]
12/5/06 [insert FR
page number where
the document begins]
12/5/06 [insert FR
page number where
the document begins]
12/5/06 [insert FR
page number where
the document begins]
*
*
*
*
*
(s) The Missouri Department of Natural
Resources submitted revisions to Missouri
rule 10 CSR 10–6.020, ‘‘Definitions and
Common Reference Tables,’’ on March 13,
2006, approval effective January 4, 2007.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–20446 Filed 12–4–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\05DER1.SGM
05DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 233 (Tuesday, December 5, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 70468-70471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20446]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70
[EPA-R07-OAR-2006-0900; FRL-8250-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating
Permits Program; State of Missouri
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) and operating permits program revision
submitted by the state of Missouri to update the ambient air quality
standards, sampling methods, definitions, and common reference methods
and tables. The update also includes references to implement the 8-hour
ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards that
were finalized on July 18, 1997.
DATES: This direct final rule will be effective February 5, 2007,
without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by January
4, 2007. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing
the public that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2006-0900, by one of the following methods:
1. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
3. Mail: Amy Algoe-Eakin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air
Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City,
Kansas 66101.
4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to Amy Algoe-
Eakin, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development
Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2006-0900. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public
[[Page 70469]]
docket without change and may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through https://www.regulations.gov
or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street,
Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these
documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours
in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Algoe-Eakin at (913) 551-7942, or
by e-mail at algoe-eakin.amy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This section provides
additional information by addressing the following questions:
What is a SIP?
What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?
What is the Part 70 operating permit program and approval process?
What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision and operating
permit program revision been met?
What action is EPA taking?
What is a SIP?
Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop
air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state
air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS)
established by EPA. These ambient standards are established under
section 109 of the CAA, and they currently address six criteria
pollutants. These pollutants are: Carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to
us for approval and incorporation into the Federally-enforceable SIP.
Each Federally-approved SIP protects air quality primarily by
addressing air pollution at its point of origin. These SIPs can be
extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents
and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring
networks, and modeling demonstrations.
What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?
In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the
Federally-enforceable SIP, states must formally adopt the regulations
and control strategies consistent with state and Federal requirements.
This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public
comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking
body.
Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the
state submits it to us for inclusion into the SIP. We must provide
public notice and seek additional public comment regarding the proposed
Federal action on the state submission. If adverse comments are
received, they must be addressed prior to any final Federal action by
us.
All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA
under section 110 of the CAA are incorporated into the Federally-
approved SIP. Records of such SIP actions are maintained in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) at title 40, part 52, entitled ``Approval and
Promulgation of Implementation Plans.'' The actual state regulations
which are approved are not reproduced in their entirety in the CFR
outright but are ``incorporated by reference,'' which means that we
have approved a given state regulation with a specific effective date.
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?
Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is
incorporated into the Federally-approved SIP is primarily a state
responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, we
are authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens
are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in
section 304 of the CAA.
What is the Part 70 operating permits program and approval process?
The CAA requires all states to develop operating permits programs
that meet certain Federal criteria. The purpose of the program is to
consolidate all applicable CAA requirements into a single permit
document issued to a source subject to the permit program. The process
for EPA approval of a Part 70 program or program revision is similar to
the process for approval of a SIP. Permits issued under an EPA-approved
permit program are enforceable by EPA and the state.
What is being addressed in this document?
EPA is approving a revision to the SIP and Part 70 permits program
for the state of Missouri that was state effective on February 28,
2006. The revisions include the 8-hour ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS
that were finalized by EPA on July 18, 1997.
The revision to 10 CSR 10-6.010 (Ambient Air Quality Standards)
updates the ambient air quality standards table to include the Federal
revision to the NAAQS, and reformatted the columns for clarity. It
should be noted that, unlike many other requirements in the Missouri
SIP, the NAAQS are not requirements imposed directly on sources under
the CAA (although states may impose such requirements directly on
sources under state law). Sources must comply with emissions
limitations and standards under the CAA and the SIP, but the NAAQS are
not emissions limitations and standards under the CAA. However, because
the Missouri rules establish other requirements, applicable to sources,
designed to protect the NAAQS
[[Page 70470]]
(e.g., the requirement that a source may not obtain certain permits if
it would cause or contribute to a violation of the NAAQS), EPA has
included Missouri's adoption of the NAAQS in the SIP to assist in
implementation of the NAAQS.
Chapter 10 CSR 10-6.020 (Definitions and Common Reference Tables)
revises the definitions for insignificant activity, particulate matter,
and adds definitions for PM2.5. Five compounds were added to
the volatile organic compounds definition and minor changes were made
to the table listing hazardous air pollutants (table 3), and the
related footnotes. In order to maintain formatting consistent with
other rules, the state added sections (4) and (5) to state that
reporting and record keeping, and test methods are not applicable to 10
CSR 10-6.020. It should be noted that revisions made to 10 CSR 10-
6.020, and specifically the clarification of the definition of
``insignificant activity'' also apply to Missouri's operating permits
program.
The revisions to 10 CSR 10-6.030 (Sampling Methods for Air
Pollution sources) add EPA's Conditional Test Method 039 to determine
the total PM10 and PM2.5 fraction of filterable
particulate matter including condensibles. Two paragraphs that
discussed PM2.5 emissions in stack gases were combined for
clarity and readability.
Revisions to 10 CSR 10-6.040 (Reference Methods) add references to
appendices included in the Federal regulations that specify test
methods for PM2.5.
Minor revisions to each of the rules were made to correct spelling,
to include the most recent date of the Federal regulations, and to
improve the overall readability.
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision and operating
permit program revision been met?
The state submittal has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submittal also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In
addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical
support document which is part of this docket, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA. Finally, the submittal meets
the substantive requirements of Title V of the 1990 CAA Amendments and
40 CFR Part 70.
What action is EPA taking?
EPA is a approving a revision to the SIP for the state of Missouri
to update the ambient air quality standards, sampling methods,
definitions, and common reference methods and tables to include the 8-
hour ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS that were finalized on July 18,
1997. EPA is also approving the revisions to the state's definitions
rule as a revision to the Part 70 operating program. We are processing
this action as a direct final action because the revisions make routine
changes to the existing SIP which are noncontroversial. Therefore, we
do not anticipate any adverse comments. Please note that if EPA
receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be
severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those
parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing state submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a state submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a state
submission, to use VCS in place of a state submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 5, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
[[Page 70471]]
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Part 70
Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control,
Intergovernmental relations, Operating permits, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 21, 2006.
John B. Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
0
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart AA--Missouri
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320(c) the table is amended under Chapter 6 by revising
the entries for ``10-6.010, 10-6.020, 10-6.030 and 10-6.040'' to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.1320 Identification of Plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Missouri citation Title effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of Missouri
* * * * * * *
10-6.010............................. Ambient Air Quality 2/28/06 12/5/06 [insert FR page number
Standards. where the document begins]
10-6.020............................. Definitions and Common 2/28/06 12/5/06 [insert FR page number
Reference Tables. where the document begins]
10-6.030............................. Sampling Methods for Air 2/28/06 12/5/06 [insert FR page number
Pollution Sources. where the document begins]
10-6.040............................. Reference Methods........... 2/28/06 12/5/06 [insert FR page number
where the document begins]
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 70--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Appendix A--[Amended]
0
2. Appendix A to part 70 is amended by adding paragraph (s) to read as
follows:
Appendix A to Part 70--Approval Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
* * * * *
Missouri
* * * * *
(s) The Missouri Department of Natural Resources submitted
revisions to Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.020, ``Definitions and Common
Reference Tables,'' on March 13, 2006, approval effective January 4,
2007.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E6-20446 Filed 12-4-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P