Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Contract Pricing and Cost Accounting Standards, 69492-69495 [E6-20396]
Download as PDF
69492
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 231 / Friday, December 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
Parts 212, 232, and 252 continues to
read as follows:
252.232–7010
Payments.
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
Chapter 1.
LEVIES ON CONTRACT PAYMENTS
(DEC 2006)
PART 212—ACQUISITION OF
COMMERCIAL ITEMS
*
I
*
2. Section 212.301 is amended by
adding paragraph (f)(xi) to read as
follows:
I
212.301 Solicitation provisions and
contract clauses for the acquisition of
commercial items.
(f) * * *
(xi) Use the clause at 252.232–7010,
Levies on Contract Payments, as
prescribed in 232.7102.
PART 232—CONTRACT FINANCING
3. Sections 232.7101 and 232.7102 are
revised to read as follows:
I
232.7101
Policy and procedures.
(a) The contracting officer shall
require the contractor to—
(1) Promptly notify the contracting
officer when a levy may result in an
inability to perform the contract; and
(2) Advise the contracting officer
whether the inability to perform may
adversely affect national security.
(b) The contracting officer shall
promptly notify the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy
(DPAP), when the contractor’s inability
to perform will adversely affect national
security or will result in significant
additional costs to the Government.
Follow the procedures at PGI
232.7101(b) for reviewing the
contractor’s rationale and submitting the
required notification.
(c) The Director, DPAP, will promptly
evaluate the contractor’s rationale and
will notify the IRS, the contracting
officer, and the payment office, as
appropriate, in accordance with the
procedures at PGI 232.7101(c).
(d) The contracting officer shall then
notify the contractor in accordance with
paragraph (c) of the clause at 252.232–
7010 and in accordance with the
procedures at PGI 232.7101(d).
232.7102
Contract clause.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
Use the clause at 252.232–7010,
Levies on Contract Payments, in all
solicitations and contracts other than
those for micro-purchases.
13:12 Nov 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
*
*
(b) When a levy is imposed on a
payment under this contract and the
Contractor believes that the levy may
result in an inability to perform the
contract, the Contractor shall promptly
notify the Procuring Contracting Officer
in writing, with a copy to the
Administrative Contracting Officer, and
shall provide—
(1) The total dollar amount of the
levy;
(2) A statement that the Contractor
believes that the levy may result in an
inability to perform the contract,
including rationale and adequate
supporting documentation; and
(3) Advice as to whether the inability
to perform may adversely affect national
security, including rationale and
adequate supporting documentation.
(c) DoD shall promptly review the
Contractor’s assessment, and the
Procuring Contracting Officer shall
provide a written notification to the
Contractor including—
(1) A statement as to whether DoD
agrees that the levy may result in an
inability to perform the contract; and
(2)(i) If the levy may result in an
inability to perform the contract and the
lack of performance will adversely affect
national security, the total amount of
the monies collected that should be
returned to the Contractor; or
(ii) If the levy may result in an
inability to perform the contract but will
not impact national security, a
recommendation that the Contractor
promptly notify the IRS to attempt to
resolve the tax situation.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E6–20394 Filed 11–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
[DFARS Case 2003–D014]
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement; Contract
Pricing and Cost Accounting
Standards
4. Section 252.232–7010 is amended
by revising the clause date and
paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
I
*
Levies on Contract
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement
(DFARS) to update text addressing
contract pricing matters and cost
accounting standards administration.
The rule implements statutory
provisions regarding exceptions to cost
or pricing data requirements and waiver
of cost accounting standards, and
relocates internal DoD procedures
relating to pricing considerations and
cost accounting standards to the DFARS
companion resource, Procedures,
Guidance, and Information.
DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Bill Sain, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L)
DPAP (DARS), IMD 3C132, 3062
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0293;
facsimile (703) 602–0350. Please cite
DFARS Case 2003–D014.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
This final rule updates DFARS text
addressing contract pricing matters and
cost accounting standards
administration. The DFARS changes
include—
Æ Addition of text at 215.403–1 and
230.201–5 to implement Section 817 of
the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2003 (Pub. L. 107–314)
regarding exceptions to cost or pricing
data requirements and waiver of cost
accounting standards.
Æ Deletion of 215.404–1(d), Cost
realism analysis, because FAR 15.404–1
contains sufficient policy on this
subject.
Æ Deletion of unnecessary
introductory text at redesignated
215.404–71–4(f), Facilities capital
employed, Values: Normal and
designated ranges.
Æ Relocation of the definition of
‘‘Acceptable estimating system’’ from
215.407–5–70(a)(1) to the contract
clause at 252.215–7002, Cost Estimating
System Requirements; elimination of
215.407–5–70(b)(1)(iii) and (iv) and
relocation of the language to the new
definition at 252.215–7002(a); and
deletion of duplicative language at
252.215–7002(b).
Æ Removal of 230.7000, Contract
facilities capital estimates; 230.7001,
Use of DD Form 1861; and 230.7002,
Preaward facilities capital applications;
and relocation of text on these subjects
to 215.404–71–4, Weighted guidelines
method—Facilities capital employed,
since these sections pertain to the
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 231 / Friday, December 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
calculation of weighted guidelines for
profit, rather than cost accounting
standards.
Æ Elimination of 230.7003, Postaward
facilities capital applications, and
230.7004–1, Forms CASB–CMF, since
these sections duplicate Cost
Accounting Standard (CAS) 414, Cost of
Money as an Element of the Cost of
Facilities Capital; FAR 31.205–10, Cost
of Money; and the implementing
contract clauses.
Æ Elimination of the definitions of
‘‘intangible capital asset’’ and ‘‘tangible
capital asset’’ at 230.7100(a) and (b),
since these definitions are provided in
the cost accounting standards;
elimination of the definition of ‘‘cost of
money rate’’ at 230.7100(c), because it
conflicts with cost accounting
standards; and elimination of the
definition of ‘‘representative
investment’’ at 230.7100(d), because it is
unnecessary.
Æ Elimination of 230.7101,
Calculations, and 230.7102,
Determining imputed cost of money,
because they are adequately covered in
CAS 417, Cost of Money as an Element
of the Cost of Capital Assets Under
Construction (48 CFR 9904.417).
Æ Removal of 230.7103, Preaward
capital employed application, and
relocation of text on this subject to
215.404–73(b)(2)(i), Offsets for facilities
capital cost of money, since it applies to
offsets in determining profit, rather than
cost accounting standards.
Æ Relocation of the following text to
the DFARS companion resource,
Procedures, Guidance, and Information
(PGI), at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/
dars/pgi.
Æ 215.403–5, Instructions for
submission of cost or pricing data or
information other than cost or pricing
data.
Æ 215.404–2, Information to support
proposal analysis.
Æ 215.404–3, Subcontract pricing
considerations.
Æ 215.404–70, DD Form 1547, Record
of Weighted Guidelines Method
Application.
Æ 215.404–76, Reporting profit and
fee statistics.
Æ 215.406–1, Prenegotiation
objectives.
Æ 215.406–3, Documenting the
negotiation.
Æ 215.407–4, Should-cost review.
Æ 215.407–5–70(e) and (f), Estimating
systems—Disclosure, maintenance, and
review requirements.
Æ 215.470(b) and (c), Estimated data
prices, except that the first sentence of
(b) remains in DFARS, and is revised for
clarity.
Æ 230.201–5(a)(1), Waiver (partial
relocation).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:12 Nov 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
Æ 230.7004–2, DD Form 1861
(relocated to PGI 215.404–71–4(c),
consistent with the relocation of
230.7000, 230.7001, and 230.7002 to
DFARS 215.404–71–4.
Æ 253.215–70, DD Form 1547, Record
of Weighted Guidelines Application.
DoD published a proposed rule at 70
FR 75440 on December 20, 2005. One
industry association submitted
comments on the proposed rule. The
industry association questioned the
proposed relocation of the weighted
guidelines profit analysis procedures
from DFARS Subpart 15.4 to PGI, since
considerations that DoD contracting
officers use to develop profit objectives
have a significant impact on industry.
DoD agrees with this comment and has
retained the weighted guidelines
procedures in DFARS Subpart 215.4,
with the exception of the text at
215.404–70, which merely provides a
general description of the DD Form 1547
and its use, and the text at 215.404–76,
which deals exclusively with internal
DoD reporting of profit and fee statistics.
Additional differences between the
proposed and final rules include—
215.403–1(c)(1)—This text, which
addresses standards for exceptions from
cost or pricing data requirements, is
retained in the DFARS, since these
standards affect industry.
215.403–1(c)(3)—This text is
amended to clarify that the
determination as to whether a
commercial item exception applies is
made by the contracting officer.
215.406–1—The reference to
corresponding PGI text is revised to
indicate that the PGI procedures are
mandatory.
This rule was not subject to Office of
Management and Budget review under
Executive Order 12866, dated
September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD certifies that this final rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule updates, clarifies, and
relocates DFARS text, but makes no
significant change to DoD contracting
policy.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does
not apply, because the rule does not
impose any information collection
requirements that require the approval
of the Office of Management and Budget
under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69493
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215,
230, 252, and 253
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252,
and 253 are amended as follows:
I 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253 continues
to read as follows:
I
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR
Chapter 1.
PART 215—CONTRACTING BY
NEGOTIATION
2. Section 215.403–1 is amended as
follows:
I a. By adding paragraph (c)(3);
I b. By redesignating paragraphs
(c)(4)(A) and (B) as paragraphs (c)(4)(C)
and (D) respectively; and
I c. By adding new paragraphs (c)(4)(A)
and (B) to read as follows:
I
215.403–1 Prohibition on obtaining cost or
pricing data.
(c) * * *
(3) Commercial items. By November
30th of each year, departments and
agencies shall provide a report to the
Director, Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy (DPAP), ATTN:
DPAP/CPF, of all contracting officer
determinations that commercial item
exceptions apply under FAR 15.403–
1(b)(3), during the previous fiscal year,
for any contract, subcontract, or
modification expected to have a value of
$15,000,000 or more. See PGI 215.403–
1(c)(3) for the format and guidance for
the report. The Director, DPAP, will
submit a consolidated report to the
congressional defense committees.
(4) * * *
(A) The head of the contracting
activity may, without power of
delegation, apply the exceptional
circumstances authority when a
determination is made that—
(1) The property or services cannot
reasonably be obtained under the
contract, subcontract, or modification,
without the granting of the waiver;
(2) The price can be determined to be
fair and reasonable without the
submission of certified cost or pricing
data; and
(3) There are demonstrated benefits to
granting the waiver. See PGI 215.403–
1(c)(4)(A) for guidance applicable to
waivers for part of a proposal and
unpriced options.
(B) By November 30th of each year,
departments and agencies shall provide
a report to the Director, DPAP, ATTN:
DPAP/CPF, of all waivers granted under
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
69494
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 231 / Friday, December 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
FAR 15.403–1(b)(4), during the previous
fiscal year, for any contract, subcontract,
or modification expected to have a value
of $15,000,000 or more. See PGI
215.403–1(c)(4)(B) for the format and
guidance for the report. The Director,
DPAP, will submit a consolidated report
to the congressional defense
committees.
*
*
*
*
*
I 3. Section 215.403–5 is revised to read
as follows:
215.403–5 Instructions for submission of
cost or pricing data or information other
than cost or pricing data.
When the solicitation requires
contractor compliance with the
Contractor Cost Data Reporting System,
follow the procedures at PGI 215.403–5.
215.404–1
[Amended]
4. Section 215.404–1 is amended by
removing paragraph (d).
I 5. Sections 215.404–2 and 215.404–3
are revised to read as follows:
I
215.404–2
analysis.
Information to support proposal
See PGI 215.404–2 for guidance on
obtaining field pricing or audit
assistance.
215.404–3 Subcontract pricing
considerations.
Follow the procedures at PGI
215.404–3 when reviewing a
subcontractor’s proposal.
I 6. Section 215.404–4 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(1) introductory
text to read as follows:
215.404–4
Profit.
(b) * * *
(1) Contracting officers shall use a
structured approach for developing a
prenegotiation profit or fee objective on
any negotiated contract action when
cost or pricing data is obtained, except
for cost-plus-award-fee contracts (see
215.404–74, 216.405–2, and FAR
16.405–2) or contracts with Federally
Funded Research and Development
Centers (FFRDCs) (see 215.404–75).
There are three structured approaches—
*
*
*
*
*
I 7. Section 215.404–70 is revised to
read as follows:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
215.404–70 DD Form 1547, Record of
Weighted Guidelines Method Application.
Follow the procedures at PGI
215.404–70 for use of DD Form 1547
whenever a structured approach to
profit analysis is required.
I 8. Section 215.404–71–4 is amended
as follows:
I a. By redesignating paragraphs (b)
through (d) as paragraphs (e) through (g)
respectively;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:15 Nov 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
b. By adding new paragraphs (b)
through (d); and c. In newly designated
paragraph (f), by removing ‘‘These are
the normal values and ranges. They
apply to all situations.’’. The added text
reads as follows:
I
215.404–71–4
Facilities capital employed.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Contract facilities capital
estimates. The contracting officer shall
estimate the facilities capital cost of
money and capital employed using—
(1) An analysis of the appropriate
Forms CASB–CMF and cost of money
factors (48 CFR 9904.414 and FAR
31.205–10); and
(2) DD Form 1861, Contract Facilities
Capital Cost of Money.
(c) Use of DD Form 1861. See PGI
215.404–71–4(c) for obtaining field
pricing support for preparing DD Form
1861.
(1) Purpose. The DD Form 1861
provides a means of linking the Form
CASB–CMF and DD Form 1547, Record
of Weighted Guidelines Application.
It—
(i) Enables the contracting officer to
differentiate profit objectives for various
types of assets (land, buildings,
equipment). The procedure is similar to
applying overhead rates to appropriate
overhead allocation bases to determine
contract overhead costs.
(ii) Is designed to record and compute
the contract facilities capital cost of
money and capital employed which is
carried forward to DD Form 1547.
(2) Completion instructions. Complete
a DD Form 1861 only after evaluating
the contractor’s cost proposal,
establishing cost of money factors, and
establishing a prenegotiation objective
on cost. Complete the form as follows:
(i) List overhead pools and directcharging service centers (if used) in the
same structure as they appear on the
contractor’s cost proposal and Form
CASB–CMF. The structure and
allocation base units-of-measure must
be compatible on all three displays.
(ii) Extract appropriate contract
overhead allocation base data, by year,
from the evaluated cost breakdown or
prenegotiation cost objective and list
against each overhead pool and directcharging service center.
(iii) Multiply each allocation base by
its corresponding cost of money factor
to get the facilities capital cost of money
estimated to be incurred each year. The
sum of these products represents the
estimated contract facilities capital cost
of money for the year’s effort.
(iv) Total contract facilities cost of
money is the sum of the yearly amounts.
(v) Since the facilities capital cost of
money factors reflect the applicable cost
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of money rate in Column 1 of Form
CASB–CMF, divide the contract cost of
money by that same rate to determine
the contract facilities capital employed.
(d) Preaward facilities capital
applications. To establish cost and price
objectives, apply the facilities capital
cost of money and capital employed as
follows:
(1) Cost of Money. (i) Cost Objective.
Use the imputed facilities capital cost of
money, with normal, booked costs, to
establish a cost objective or the target
cost when structuring an incentive type
contract. Do not adjust target costs
established at the outset even though
actual cost of money rates become
available during the period of contract
performance.
(ii) Profit Objective. When measuring
the contractor’s effort for the purpose of
establishing a prenegotiation profit
objective, restrict the cost base to
normal, booked costs. Do not include
cost of money as part of the cost base.
(2) Facilities Capital Employed.
Assess and weight the profit objective
for risk associated with facilities capital
employed in accordance with the profit
guidelines at 215.404–71–4.
*
*
*
*
*
9. Section 215.404–73 is amended by
revising paragraph (b)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
I
215.404–73 Alternate structured
approaches.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The contracting officer shall reduce
the overall prenegotiation profit
objective by the amount of facilities
capital cost of money under Cost
Accounting Standard (CAS) 414, Cost of
Money as an Element of the Cost of
Facilities Capital (48 CFR 9904.414).
Cost of money under CAS 417, Cost of
Money as an Element of the Cost of
Capital Assets Under Construction (48
CFR 9904.417), should not be used to
reduce the overall prenegotiation profit
objective. The profit amount in the
negotiation summary of the DD Form
1547 must be net of the offset.
*
*
*
*
*
10. Section 215.404–76 is revised to
read as follows:
I
215.404–76
statistics.
Reporting profit and fee
Follow the procedures at PGI
215.404–76 for reporting profit and fee
statistics.
11. Sections 215.406–1 and 215.406–
3 are revised to read as follows:
I
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 231 / Friday, December 1, 2006 / Rules and Regulations
215.406–1
Prenegotiation objectives.
230.201–5
Follow the procedures at PGI
215.406–1 for establishing
prenegotiation objectives.
215.406–3
Documenting the negotiation.
Follow the procedures at PGI
215.406–3 for documenting the
negotiation.
12. Section 215.407–4 is revised to
read as follows:
I
215.407–4
Should-cost review.
See PGI 215.407–4 for guidance on
determining whether to perform a
program or overhead should-cost
review.
I 13. Section 215.407–5–70 is amended
by revising paragraphs (a)(1), (b)(1), (e),
and (f) to read as follows:
215.407–5–70 Disclosure, maintenance,
and review requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) Acceptable estimating system is
defined in the clause at 252.215–7002,
Cost Estimating System Requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) DoD policy is that all contractors
have acceptable estimating systems that
consistently produce well-supported
proposals that are acceptable as a basis
for negotiation of fair and reasonable
prices.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Review procedures. Follow the
procedures at PGI 215.407–5–70(e) for
establishing and conducting estimating
system reviews.
(f) Disposition of survey team
findings. Follow the procedures at PGI
215.407–5–70(f) for disposition of the
survey team findings.
*
*
*
*
*
I 14. Section 215.470 is amended by
revising paragraph (b), removing
paragraph (c), and redesignating
paragraph (d) as paragraph (c). The
revised text reads as follows:
215.470
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES1
*
*
*
*
(b) When data are required to be
delivered under a contract, include DD
Form 1423, Contract Data Requirements
List, in the solicitation. See PGI
215.470(b) for guidance on the use of
DD Form 1423.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 230—COST ACCOUNTING
STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
15. Section 230.201–5 is revised to
read as follows:
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:15 Nov 30, 2006
Jkt 211001
252.215–7002 Cost Estimating System
Requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
COST ESTIMATING SYSTEM
REQUIREMENTS (DEC 2006)
(a) Definitions.
Acceptable estimating system means
an estimating system that—
(1) Is maintained, reliable, and
consistently applied;
(2) Produces verifiable, supportable,
and documented cost estimates that are
an acceptable basis for negotiation of
fair and reasonable prices;
(3) Is consistent with and integrated
with the Contractor’s related
management systems; and
(4) Is subject to applicable financial
control systems.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) General. The Contractor shall
establish, maintain, and comply with an
acceptable estimating system.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 253—FORMS
18. Section 253.215–70 is revised to
read as follows:
I
253.215–70 DD Form 1547, Record of
Weighted Guidelines Application.
Follow the procedures at PGI
253.215–70 for completing DD Form
1547.
[FR Doc. E6–20396 Filed 11–30–06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 665
[Docket No. 060724200–6302–03; I.D.
052506A and 071106G]
RIN 0648–AT95 and 0648–AT94
I
Estimated data prices.
*
Waiver.
(a)(1)(A) The military departments
and the Director, Defense Procurement
and Acquisition Policy, Office of the
Under Secretary of Defense
(Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics)—
(1) May grant CAS waivers that meet
the conditions in FAR 30.201–5(b)(1);
and
(2) May grant CAS waivers that meet
the conditions in FAR 30.201–5(b)(2),
provided the cognizant Federal agency
official granting the waiver determines
that—
(i) The property or services cannot
reasonably be obtained under the
contract, subcontract, or modification,
as applicable, without granting the
waiver;
(ii) The price can be determined to be
fair and reasonable without the
application of the Cost Accounting
Standards; and
(iii) There are demonstrated benefits
to granting the waiver.
(B) Follow the procedures at PGI
230.201–5(a)(1) for submitting waiver
requests to the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy.
(2) The military departments shall not
delegate CAS waiver authority below
the individual responsible for issuing
contracting policy for the department.
(e) By November 30th of each year,
the military departments shall provide a
report to the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy,
ATTN: DPAP/CPF, of all waivers
granted under FAR 30.201–5(a), during
the previous fiscal year, for any
contract, subcontract, or modification
expected to have a value of $15,000,000
or more. See PGI 230.201–5(e) for format
and guidance for the report. The
Director, Defense Procurement and
Acquisition Policy, will submit a
consolidated report to the CAS Board
and the congressional defense
committees.
69495
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
Fisheries in the Western Pacific;
Bottomfish and Seamount Groundfish,
Crustacean, and Precious Corals
Fisheries; Permit and Reporting
Requirements
AGENCY:
Subparts 230.70 and 230.71 [Removed]
16. Subparts 230.70 and 230.71 are
removed.
17. Section 252.215–7002 is amended
as follows:
I a. By revising the clause date;
I b. In paragraph (a), by revising the
paragraph heading and adding a
definition of ‘‘Acceptable estimating
system’’; and
I c. By revising paragraph (b). The
revised and added text reads as follows:
I
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule; effectiveness of
collection-of-information requirements.
SUMMARY: NMFS announces approval by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) of collection-of-information
requirements contained in regulations
implementing the amendments to the
E:\FR\FM\01DER1.SGM
01DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 231 (Friday, December 1, 2006)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69492-69495]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-20396]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253
[DFARS Case 2003-D014]
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Contract
Pricing and Cost Accounting Standards
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD has issued a final rule amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update text addressing
contract pricing matters and cost accounting standards administration.
The rule implements statutory provisions regarding exceptions to cost
or pricing data requirements and waiver of cost accounting standards,
and relocates internal DoD procedures relating to pricing
considerations and cost accounting standards to the DFARS companion
resource, Procedures, Guidance, and Information.
DATES: Effective Date: December 1, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Bill Sain, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-3062. Telephone (703) 602-0293;
facsimile (703) 602-0350. Please cite DFARS Case 2003-D014.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
This final rule updates DFARS text addressing contract pricing
matters and cost accounting standards administration. The DFARS changes
include--
[cir] Addition of text at 215.403-1 and 230.201-5 to implement
Section 817 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year
2003 (Pub. L. 107-314) regarding exceptions to cost or pricing data
requirements and waiver of cost accounting standards.
[cir] Deletion of 215.404-1(d), Cost realism analysis, because FAR
15.404-1 contains sufficient policy on this subject.
[cir] Deletion of unnecessary introductory text at redesignated
215.404-71-4(f), Facilities capital employed, Values: Normal and
designated ranges.
[cir] Relocation of the definition of ``Acceptable estimating
system'' from 215.407-5-70(a)(1) to the contract clause at 252.215-
7002, Cost Estimating System Requirements; elimination of 215.407-5-
70(b)(1)(iii) and (iv) and relocation of the language to the new
definition at 252.215-7002(a); and deletion of duplicative language at
252.215-7002(b).
[cir] Removal of 230.7000, Contract facilities capital estimates;
230.7001, Use of DD Form 1861; and 230.7002, Preaward facilities
capital applications; and relocation of text on these subjects to
215.404-71-4, Weighted guidelines method--Facilities capital employed,
since these sections pertain to the
[[Page 69493]]
calculation of weighted guidelines for profit, rather than cost
accounting standards.
[cir] Elimination of 230.7003, Postaward facilities capital
applications, and 230.7004-1, Forms CASB-CMF, since these sections
duplicate Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) 414, Cost of Money as an
Element of the Cost of Facilities Capital; FAR 31.205-10, Cost of
Money; and the implementing contract clauses.
[cir] Elimination of the definitions of ``intangible capital
asset'' and ``tangible capital asset'' at 230.7100(a) and (b), since
these definitions are provided in the cost accounting standards;
elimination of the definition of ``cost of money rate'' at 230.7100(c),
because it conflicts with cost accounting standards; and elimination of
the definition of ``representative investment'' at 230.7100(d), because
it is unnecessary.
[cir] Elimination of 230.7101, Calculations, and 230.7102,
Determining imputed cost of money, because they are adequately covered
in CAS 417, Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost of Capital Assets
Under Construction (48 CFR 9904.417).
[cir] Removal of 230.7103, Preaward capital employed application,
and relocation of text on this subject to 215.404-73(b)(2)(i), Offsets
for facilities capital cost of money, since it applies to offsets in
determining profit, rather than cost accounting standards.
[cir] Relocation of the following text to the DFARS companion
resource, Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI), at https://
www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi.
[cir] 215.403-5, Instructions for submission of cost or pricing
data or information other than cost or pricing data.
[cir] 215.404-2, Information to support proposal analysis.
[cir] 215.404-3, Subcontract pricing considerations.
[cir] 215.404-70, DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines
Method Application.
[cir] 215.404-76, Reporting profit and fee statistics.
[cir] 215.406-1, Prenegotiation objectives.
[cir] 215.406-3, Documenting the negotiation.
[cir] 215.407-4, Should-cost review.
[cir] 215.407-5-70(e) and (f), Estimating systems--Disclosure,
maintenance, and review requirements.
[cir] 215.470(b) and (c), Estimated data prices, except that the
first sentence of (b) remains in DFARS, and is revised for clarity.
[cir] 230.201-5(a)(1), Waiver (partial relocation).
[cir] 230.7004-2, DD Form 1861 (relocated to PGI 215.404-71-4(c),
consistent with the relocation of 230.7000, 230.7001, and 230.7002 to
DFARS 215.404-71-4.
[cir] 253.215-70, DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines
Application.
DoD published a proposed rule at 70 FR 75440 on December 20, 2005.
One industry association submitted comments on the proposed rule. The
industry association questioned the proposed relocation of the weighted
guidelines profit analysis procedures from DFARS Subpart 15.4 to PGI,
since considerations that DoD contracting officers use to develop
profit objectives have a significant impact on industry. DoD agrees
with this comment and has retained the weighted guidelines procedures
in DFARS Subpart 215.4, with the exception of the text at 215.404-70,
which merely provides a general description of the DD Form 1547 and its
use, and the text at 215.404-76, which deals exclusively with internal
DoD reporting of profit and fee statistics.
Additional differences between the proposed and final rules
include--
215.403-1(c)(1)--This text, which addresses standards for
exceptions from cost or pricing data requirements, is retained in the
DFARS, since these standards affect industry.
215.403-1(c)(3)--This text is amended to clarify that the
determination as to whether a commercial item exception applies is made
by the contracting officer.
215.406-1--The reference to corresponding PGI text is revised to
indicate that the PGI procedures are mandatory.
This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review
under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD certifies that this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because the rule updates, clarifies, and relocates DFARS text, but
makes no significant change to DoD contracting policy.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply, because the rule does
not impose any information collection requirements that require the
approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501,
et seq.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253
Government procurement.
Michele P. Peterson,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
0
Therefore, 48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253 are amended as follows:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Parts 215, 230, 252, and 253
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1.
PART 215--CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
0
2. Section 215.403-1 is amended as follows:
0
a. By adding paragraph (c)(3);
0
b. By redesignating paragraphs (c)(4)(A) and (B) as paragraphs
(c)(4)(C) and (D) respectively; and
0
c. By adding new paragraphs (c)(4)(A) and (B) to read as follows:
215.403-1 Prohibition on obtaining cost or pricing data.
(c) * * *
(3) Commercial items. By November 30th of each year, departments
and agencies shall provide a report to the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy (DPAP), ATTN: DPAP/CPF, of all
contracting officer determinations that commercial item exceptions
apply under FAR 15.403-1(b)(3), during the previous fiscal year, for
any contract, subcontract, or modification expected to have a value of
$15,000,000 or more. See PGI 215.403-1(c)(3) for the format and
guidance for the report. The Director, DPAP, will submit a consolidated
report to the congressional defense committees.
(4) * * *
(A) The head of the contracting activity may, without power of
delegation, apply the exceptional circumstances authority when a
determination is made that--
(1) The property or services cannot reasonably be obtained under
the contract, subcontract, or modification, without the granting of the
waiver;
(2) The price can be determined to be fair and reasonable without
the submission of certified cost or pricing data; and
(3) There are demonstrated benefits to granting the waiver. See PGI
215.403-1(c)(4)(A) for guidance applicable to waivers for part of a
proposal and unpriced options.
(B) By November 30th of each year, departments and agencies shall
provide a report to the Director, DPAP, ATTN: DPAP/CPF, of all waivers
granted under
[[Page 69494]]
FAR 15.403-1(b)(4), during the previous fiscal year, for any contract,
subcontract, or modification expected to have a value of $15,000,000 or
more. See PGI 215.403-1(c)(4)(B) for the format and guidance for the
report. The Director, DPAP, will submit a consolidated report to the
congressional defense committees.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 215.403-5 is revised to read as follows:
215.403-5 Instructions for submission of cost or pricing data or
information other than cost or pricing data.
When the solicitation requires contractor compliance with the
Contractor Cost Data Reporting System, follow the procedures at PGI
215.403-5.
215.404-1 [Amended]
0
4. Section 215.404-1 is amended by removing paragraph (d).
0
5. Sections 215.404-2 and 215.404-3 are revised to read as follows:
215.404-2 Information to support proposal analysis.
See PGI 215.404-2 for guidance on obtaining field pricing or audit
assistance.
215.404-3 Subcontract pricing considerations.
Follow the procedures at PGI 215.404-3 when reviewing a
subcontractor's proposal.
0
6. Section 215.404-4 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(1)
introductory text to read as follows:
215.404-4 Profit.
(b) * * *
(1) Contracting officers shall use a structured approach for
developing a prenegotiation profit or fee objective on any negotiated
contract action when cost or pricing data is obtained, except for cost-
plus-award-fee contracts (see 215.404-74, 216.405-2, and FAR 16.405-2)
or contracts with Federally Funded Research and Development Centers
(FFRDCs) (see 215.404-75). There are three structured approaches--
* * * * *
0
7. Section 215.404-70 is revised to read as follows:
215.404-70 DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines Method
Application.
Follow the procedures at PGI 215.404-70 for use of DD Form 1547
whenever a structured approach to profit analysis is required.
0
8. Section 215.404-71-4 is amended as follows:
0
a. By redesignating paragraphs (b) through (d) as paragraphs (e)
through (g) respectively;
0
b. By adding new paragraphs (b) through (d); and c. In newly designated
paragraph (f), by removing ``These are the normal values and ranges.
They apply to all situations.''. The added text reads as follows:
215.404-71-4 Facilities capital employed.
* * * * *
(b) Contract facilities capital estimates. The contracting officer
shall estimate the facilities capital cost of money and capital
employed using--
(1) An analysis of the appropriate Forms CASB-CMF and cost of money
factors (48 CFR 9904.414 and FAR 31.205-10); and
(2) DD Form 1861, Contract Facilities Capital Cost of Money.
(c) Use of DD Form 1861. See PGI 215.404-71-4(c) for obtaining
field pricing support for preparing DD Form 1861.
(1) Purpose. The DD Form 1861 provides a means of linking the Form
CASB-CMF and DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines Application.
It--
(i) Enables the contracting officer to differentiate profit
objectives for various types of assets (land, buildings, equipment).
The procedure is similar to applying overhead rates to appropriate
overhead allocation bases to determine contract overhead costs.
(ii) Is designed to record and compute the contract facilities
capital cost of money and capital employed which is carried forward to
DD Form 1547.
(2) Completion instructions. Complete a DD Form 1861 only after
evaluating the contractor's cost proposal, establishing cost of money
factors, and establishing a prenegotiation objective on cost. Complete
the form as follows:
(i) List overhead pools and direct-charging service centers (if
used) in the same structure as they appear on the contractor's cost
proposal and Form CASB-CMF. The structure and allocation base units-of-
measure must be compatible on all three displays.
(ii) Extract appropriate contract overhead allocation base data, by
year, from the evaluated cost breakdown or prenegotiation cost
objective and list against each overhead pool and direct-charging
service center.
(iii) Multiply each allocation base by its corresponding cost of
money factor to get the facilities capital cost of money estimated to
be incurred each year. The sum of these products represents the
estimated contract facilities capital cost of money for the year's
effort.
(iv) Total contract facilities cost of money is the sum of the
yearly amounts.
(v) Since the facilities capital cost of money factors reflect the
applicable cost of money rate in Column 1 of Form CASB-CMF, divide the
contract cost of money by that same rate to determine the contract
facilities capital employed.
(d) Preaward facilities capital applications. To establish cost and
price objectives, apply the facilities capital cost of money and
capital employed as follows:
(1) Cost of Money. (i) Cost Objective. Use the imputed facilities
capital cost of money, with normal, booked costs, to establish a cost
objective or the target cost when structuring an incentive type
contract. Do not adjust target costs established at the outset even
though actual cost of money rates become available during the period of
contract performance.
(ii) Profit Objective. When measuring the contractor's effort for
the purpose of establishing a prenegotiation profit objective, restrict
the cost base to normal, booked costs. Do not include cost of money as
part of the cost base.
(2) Facilities Capital Employed. Assess and weight the profit
objective for risk associated with facilities capital employed in
accordance with the profit guidelines at 215.404-71-4.
* * * * *
0
9. Section 215.404-73 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(2)(i) to
read as follows:
215.404-73 Alternate structured approaches.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The contracting officer shall reduce the overall prenegotiation
profit objective by the amount of facilities capital cost of money
under Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) 414, Cost of Money as an Element
of the Cost of Facilities Capital (48 CFR 9904.414). Cost of money
under CAS 417, Cost of Money as an Element of the Cost of Capital
Assets Under Construction (48 CFR 9904.417), should not be used to
reduce the overall prenegotiation profit objective. The profit amount
in the negotiation summary of the DD Form 1547 must be net of the
offset.
* * * * *
0
10. Section 215.404-76 is revised to read as follows:
215.404-76 Reporting profit and fee statistics.
Follow the procedures at PGI 215.404-76 for reporting profit and
fee statistics.
0
11. Sections 215.406-1 and 215.406-3 are revised to read as follows:
[[Page 69495]]
215.406-1 Prenegotiation objectives.
Follow the procedures at PGI 215.406-1 for establishing
prenegotiation objectives.
215.406-3 Documenting the negotiation.
Follow the procedures at PGI 215.406-3 for documenting the
negotiation.
0
12. Section 215.407-4 is revised to read as follows:
215.407-4 Should-cost review.
See PGI 215.407-4 for guidance on determining whether to perform a
program or overhead should-cost review.
0
13. Section 215.407-5-70 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1),
(b)(1), (e), and (f) to read as follows:
215.407-5-70 Disclosure, maintenance, and review requirements.
(a) * * *
(1) Acceptable estimating system is defined in the clause at
252.215-7002, Cost Estimating System Requirements.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) DoD policy is that all contractors have acceptable estimating
systems that consistently produce well-supported proposals that are
acceptable as a basis for negotiation of fair and reasonable prices.
* * * * *
(e) Review procedures. Follow the procedures at PGI 215.407-5-70(e)
for establishing and conducting estimating system reviews.
(f) Disposition of survey team findings. Follow the procedures at
PGI 215.407-5-70(f) for disposition of the survey team findings.
* * * * *
0
14. Section 215.470 is amended by revising paragraph (b), removing
paragraph (c), and redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (c). The
revised text reads as follows:
215.470 Estimated data prices.
* * * * *
(b) When data are required to be delivered under a contract,
include DD Form 1423, Contract Data Requirements List, in the
solicitation. See PGI 215.470(b) for guidance on the use of DD Form
1423.
* * * * *
PART 230--COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION
0
15. Section 230.201-5 is revised to read as follows:
230.201-5 Waiver.
(a)(1)(A) The military departments and the Director, Defense
Procurement and Acquisition Policy, Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense (Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics)--
(1) May grant CAS waivers that meet the conditions in FAR 30.201-
5(b)(1); and
(2) May grant CAS waivers that meet the conditions in FAR 30.201-
5(b)(2), provided the cognizant Federal agency official granting the
waiver determines that--
(i) The property or services cannot reasonably be obtained under
the contract, subcontract, or modification, as applicable, without
granting the waiver;
(ii) The price can be determined to be fair and reasonable without
the application of the Cost Accounting Standards; and
(iii) There are demonstrated benefits to granting the waiver.
(B) Follow the procedures at PGI 230.201-5(a)(1) for submitting
waiver requests to the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition
Policy.
(2) The military departments shall not delegate CAS waiver
authority below the individual responsible for issuing contracting
policy for the department.
(e) By November 30th of each year, the military departments shall
provide a report to the Director, Defense Procurement and Acquisition
Policy, ATTN: DPAP/CPF, of all waivers granted under FAR 30.201-5(a),
during the previous fiscal year, for any contract, subcontract, or
modification expected to have a value of $15,000,000 or more. See PGI
230.201-5(e) for format and guidance for the report. The Director,
Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, will submit a consolidated
report to the CAS Board and the congressional defense committees.
Subparts 230.70 and 230.71 [Removed]
0
16. Subparts 230.70 and 230.71 are removed.
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
17. Section 252.215-7002 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising the clause date;
0
b. In paragraph (a), by revising the paragraph heading and adding a
definition of ``Acceptable estimating system''; and
0
c. By revising paragraph (b). The revised and added text reads as
follows:
252.215-7002 Cost Estimating System Requirements.
* * * * *
COST ESTIMATING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS (DEC 2006)
(a) Definitions.
Acceptable estimating system means an estimating system that--
(1) Is maintained, reliable, and consistently applied;
(2) Produces verifiable, supportable, and documented cost estimates
that are an acceptable basis for negotiation of fair and reasonable
prices;
(3) Is consistent with and integrated with the Contractor's related
management systems; and
(4) Is subject to applicable financial control systems.
* * * * *
(b) General. The Contractor shall establish, maintain, and comply
with an acceptable estimating system.
* * * * *
PART 253--FORMS
0
18. Section 253.215-70 is revised to read as follows:
253.215-70 DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines Application.
Follow the procedures at PGI 253.215-70 for completing DD Form
1547.
[FR Doc. E6-20396 Filed 11-30-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-08-P